To compare surgical and refractive outcomes between phacotrabeculectomy (P-Trab) and phaco with Ex-PRESS (P-Ex-PRESS) for glaucoma at 6-month follow-up. This prospective randomized controlled trial included 81 eyes; 43 (53%) and 38 (47%) were assigned to the P-Ex-PRESS and P-Trab groups, respectively. Refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), and best-corrected visual acuity were measured. Refractive change was described by analyzing the magnitude of the cylinder, and polar analysis assessed the change in trend of astigmatism [with-the-rule, against-the-rule (ATR), oblique] evaluating mean astigmatism in centroid form. All patients showed statistically significant postsurgical decrease in IOP (P<0.05). There were no differences neither between the groups for postoperative IOP or visual outcomes, nor in astigmatism before or after surgery (P=0.61, P=0.74). In both groups, the mean pre- and postoperative astigmatism was ATR and OBL, respectively. Pre- and postoperative centroids in the P-Ex-PRESS group were 0.44±1.32 D at 177˚ and 0.35±1 D at 8˚, respectively, (P=0.5) and in the P-Trab group, 0.16±1.5 D at 141˚ and 0.39±1.38 D at 29˚, respectively (P=0.38). Both P-Ex-PRESS and P-Trab showed comparable antihypertensive efficacy in treating open-angle glaucoma in a 6-month period. Pre- and postoperative astigmatism did not differ between groups. The groups showed comparable results for final visual acuity.

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. Surgical and pharmacological treatment of glaucoma aims to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP) and preserve visual function. The severe acute res-piratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has placed a strain on the healthcare system. We aimed to compare the quantity, type of anti-glaucoma surgeries, and the disease stage before and during the coronavirus disease pandemic. We analyzed 362 eyes of 306 patients and 172 eyes of 149 patients from the pre-pandemic and pandemic groups, respectively. The number of an-ti-glaucoma surgeries was halved during the pandemic compared to a similar pre-pandemic pe-riod, with a significant difference in the procedural structures between the two groups (p<0.001). The most common procedures in the pre-pandemic group were Ex-Press implantation (33.7%) and trabeculectomy (31.5%). Within the pandemic group, half of the eyes underwent tra-beculectomy (50.0%), followed by Preserflo microshunt (11.6%). A significant difference in the average IOPs was revealed among patients who qualified for surgery 22.21 ± 7.83 mmHg in the pre-pandemic group and 25.16 ± 9.48 mmHg in the pandemic group; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the best corrected visual acuity between the groups (p=0.263). Glaucoma treatment remained relatively accessible during the pandemic.