Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (P-NET) is a rare neoplasm originating in the neuroendocrine system. Carcinoid syndrome occurs in approximately 19% of patients with functional P-NETs, typically when liver metastases occur. NETs diagnosis is frequently late, along with symptoms related to hormone hypersecretion. We described the case of a patient with a low-grade non-functional P-NET, but with a typical clinical presentation of a carcinoid syndrome; moreover, we reviewed the literature regarding this topic. An 81-year-old male was admitted to our Department of Internal Medicine at Cannizzaro Hospital (Catania, Italy) because of the onset of abdominal pain with nausea, loose stools and episodic flushing. Firstly, an abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan showed a small pancreatic hypervascular mass; then a gallium-68 DOTATOC integrated PET/CT revealed an elevated expression of SSTR receptors. Serum Chromogranin A and urinary 5-HIAA measurements resulted negative. Given the small size of the lesion (8 mm), we preferred to perform an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), allowing the diagnosis of low-grade (G1) non-functional P-NET (NF-P-NET). Surgery was waived, while a follow-up strategy was chosen. Early recognition of P-NETs, although rare, is necessary to improve patient’s survival. EUS-FNB should be the protocol of choice for an early characterization of these tumors.

Early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) requires further examination after selecting cases with risk factors for the condition, such as family history, hereditary pancreatic carcinoma syndrome, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, or chronic pancreatitis. The Japan Study Group on the Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer has investigated and clarified the clinicopathological features for the early diagnosis of PDAC. Further approaches for the early diagnosis of PDAC are warranted.

1) Background: Ultrasound-based strain imaging is now available in several ultrasound (US) scanners. Strain ratio (SR) can be used to quantify strain recorded simultaneously in two different user-selected areas, ideally exposed to the same amount of stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate SR variability when assessed in an in-vitro setup with a tissue-mimicking phantom, on resected tissue samples and in live tissue scanning with endoscopic applications. 2) Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of SR for quantification of elastic contrasts in a tissue-mimicking phantom containing four homogenous inclusions, in 38 resected bowel wall lesions and in 48 focal pancreatic lesions examined in vivo. Median SR and the inter-quartile range (IQR) was calculated on all external and endoscopic US-applications. The IQR/median provides a measure of the SR variability focusing on the two percentiles of the data closest to the median value. 3) Results: The overall variability of SR was lowest in a tissue-mimicking phantom (mean QR/median SR: 0.07). In resected bowel wall lesions representing adenomas, adenocarcinomas or Crohn lesions, the variability increased (mean IQR/Median: 0.62). During an endoscopic examination of focal pancreatic lesions in vivo, the variability increased further (mean IQR/Median: 2.04). 4) Conclusion: SR variability increased when assessed on different targets with growing heterogeneity and biological variability as one moved from homogeneous media to live tissues and endoscopic application. This may indicate a limitation for the accuracy SR evaluation in clinical applications.

Background. Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a key test in advanced rectal cancer and in the preoperative staging of a lesion suitable for transanal endoscopic surgery (TES). MRI is not operator-dependent, but its results when determining anatomical landmarks are variable. Method. Observational study of inter-observer concordance regarding four diagnostic tests used to establish the anatomical characteristics of rectal lesions: colonoscopy, rectal ultrasound (EUS), rectal MRI, and intraoperative rigid rectoscopy (IRR) in patients scheduled for transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) with curative intent. This inter-observational study assessed the concordance between four expert radiologists regarding the topographic evaluation by means of rectal MRI of lesions under consideration for TES. Results. Fifty-five consecutive rectal tumors were studied. For most of the items, the correlation between IRR and colonoscopy or EUS was generally very good (intraclass correlation coefficient -ICC-)>0.75), although the correlation between MRI and IRR in relation to size by quadrants (ICC=0.092) and location by quadrants (ICC=0.292) was weak. The ICC for the other items obtained excellent correlations: Kappa index >0.80 for all items except for the distance from the peritoneal reflection to the anal verge, where it was merely good (IK=0.606). Conclusions. The anatomical description of rectal lesions that are candidates for TES provided by means of IRR, EUS, colonoscopy and MRI is reliable. The MRI is less reliable, but in the hands of expert radiologists, the anatomical study of rectal lesions is accurate and reproducible.