Consistent increment of road traffic in cities is remained a threat to traffic performance and causes confliction. The researcher repeatedly emphasized the connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) as stronger solution to deal with traffic related issues. While having autonomous system in the dedicated lanes is found to be safe by many investigators because of predictable surrounding maneuvers, in contrast, the mixed lane states remain questionable. Different methodologies are being used to study the effects of autonomous vehicles (AVs) in the mixed traffic. Microscopic simulation tools are popular in such cases as it offers scope to experiment in cheap, robust, and optimistic way. One interesting methodology to deal with CAVs is considering it as conventional human driven vehicles and predict its possible characteristics based on the simulation inputs. One big challenge is, as there is no regular real-world data to calibrate and to validate the simulated model for CAVs. This is where conventional human driven vehicles from real world, come to aid as benchmark to offer the measure of effectiveness (MoE) for the calibration and validation. For the three most common driving modules, a sensitivity analysis of the driving behaviors of autonomous vehicles (AVs) and an effect assessment of CAVs in a mixed traffic environment were done to explore the human alike autonomous technology. The findings show that, up to a point, which is directly related to the quantity of interacting vehicles, the impact of CAVs is typically favorable. This study supports earlier research by demonstrating that CAVs outperform AVs in traffic. In addition, the sensitivity analysis has shown that technical and infrastructural advances are necessary to achieve the greatest benefits.

Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) is useful in the most dangerous maneuvers such as braking and acceleration. This study assesses how ACC modifies traffic flows by analysing the differences be-tween manual and autonomous driving in connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs). Using a platoon of 80 vehicles, tested in pairs on the road, it was possible to define the speed trends during braking and acceleration and the reaction times to the driving maneuvers (PRT, TH, TCC) with a kinematic data detector. The interactions between the CAV and the driver, have been studied in-novatively, i.e through gaze analysis. Situations of potential danger, characterized by the braking of the vehicle that precedes the car with the driver equipped with the eye tracker tool, have been recreated, considering the influence of the driver’s ACC experience. Results statistically confirmed that with the ACC switched on the reaction times are greater than manual driving (2.4/3.8 sec); this can lead to a reduction in road safety, further motivated by the rapid decrease in speed. The interpolation between automated and human data, finally, has allowed the detection of some criticalities of the system that are fundamental in order to reach the second level of automation.