Background: Cardiovascular risk in prediabetic patients is substantial yet it is often underestimated in everyday clinical practice. Objectives: This study examines the future cardiovascular risk in prediabetic patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 725 STEMI patients at a tertiary center in Austria between 2018 and 2020, categorized into groups of non-diabetic, prediabetic, and diabetic patients. Baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, and long-term survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis along with other statistical tests. Results: Of the 725 patients, 407 (56.1%) were non-diabetic, 184 (25.4%) prediabetic, and 134 (18.5%) diabetic. Prediabetic patients exhibited significant additional cardiovascular risk factors, such as arterial hypertension (67.4%) and dyslipidemia (78.3%), with prevalence rates between those of non-diabetic and diabetic patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that at three-year follow-up, prediabetic patients faced a survival disadvantage with a significant decrease in survival rates compared to non-diabetic patients (log-rank p = 0.016); their survival outcomes approached those of diabetic patients (p = 0.125). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the critical need for early identification and aggressive management of prediabetes in cardiovascular care of patients after acute STEMI. In current clinical practice, prediabetic patients are often underdiagnosed and undertreated, putting them at disproportionate risk. Integrating rigorous cardiovascular risk management strategies for prediabetic individuals, including lifestyle interventions and potentially pharmacological treatments, could prevent the progression to diabetes and mitigate associated cardiovascular risks. This paradigm shift in treating prediabetes as seriously as diabetes may significantly improve long-term survival outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a challenging healthcare issue, necessitating innovative therapies like cardiac resynchronization-defibrillation therapy (CRT-D). However, defining CRT-D responders lacks uniformity, impeding effective clinical evaluation. This study explores diverse CRT-D responder definitions, encompassing functional, echocardiographic, and laboratory criteria. Materials & Methods: A single-center study involving 132 CRT-D patients scrutinized responder criteria, including NYHA stage, LVEF increase, and proBNP decrease. Statistical analyses, such as Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox hazard regression, were employed to evaluate responder characteristics and survival outcomes. Results: Responder rates varied across criteria, revealing nuanced patient profiles. CRT-D responders, defined by NYHA decrease, LVEF increase, or proBNP decrease, exhibit improved survival rates after 2 and 3 years (p < 0.050). Young age, absence of recent myocardial infarction, and normal right ventricular, echocardiographic parameters emerge as predictors for positive response. In part, drug-based HF therapy correlates with increased responder rates. Cox regression identified LVEF ≥ 5% and proBNP decrease ≥ 25% as independent predictors of extended survival. Conclusions: CRT-D responder definitions exhibit considerable variability, emphasizing the need for a nuanced, patient-centered approach. Factors like right ventricular function, drug therapy, atrial fibrillation, and renal function influence responses. The study enriches our understanding of CRT-D response, contributing to the foundation for personalized HF management.