Submitted:
20 August 2026
Posted:
21 August 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This is a stand-alone theoretical article. It is not a protocol, a research proposal, or supplementary material to another manuscript. Conventional psychotherapeutic treatments often face limitations in cases of chronic suffering that persists despite the client's verbal understanding and reflective insight. In this article, I present Implicit Reintegration Therapy (TRI) as a brief, focal approach grounded in affective neuroscience, predictive processing, and nondeclarative memory. The central thesis holds that psychological suffering that does not stem from direct material deprivation is organized as affective shear between adaptive processes oriented toward individual survival and the preservation of social bonds. By conceiving of the body as the primary stage of this tension and of representational systems as matrices of automated response patterns, the model intervenes directly on somatosensory responses active in the present, dispensing with the retrospective reconstruction of childhood. The intervention uses mediated interoceptive confrontation and relational triangulation to promote desensitization of the aversive response and enable reeducation in everyday life. The model is formalized in three clinical hypotheses with explicit criteria for empirical refutation, which establishes the basis for controlled, independent investigation. The article closes with a prospective research agenda, which describes designs that other groups could adopt and does not constitute a study protocol.
Keywords:
implicit reintegration therapy
; affective shear
; psychotherapy theory
; interoception
; nondeclarative memory
; falsifiability
Introduction
In direct clinical experience, I encounter a recurrent pattern that is independent of the condition the client presents, in which well-articulated rational understanding of one’s own suffering does not produce sustained change. Verbal insight coexists, without apparent contradiction, with the repetition of the very behavior it should dissolve. Cognitive-behavioral approaches, acceptance and commitment therapy, and psychodynamic interventions respond well to suffering that stems from distorted beliefs or unprocessed psychic conflict (Hofmann et al., 2012; A-Tjak et al., 2015; Shedler, 2010).
Implicit Reintegration Therapy (TRI, an acronym retained from the original Portuguese name, Terapia de Reintegração Implícita) arises from this specific clinical gap, which the established approaches leave open in such cases. I formulated TRI on the basis of systematic clinical observation and continuous dialogue with affective neuroscience, starting from the premise that part of persistent suffering results from the maintenance of automatic adaptive processes operating below the threshold of verbal narrative, in line with the role of interoception in the re-representation of subjective experience (Craig, 2009). When two of these processes are mobilized in incompatible ways by the same relational demand, a tension is established that sustains avoidant behavior and the discomfort associated with it, which I call affective shear. Reducing this tension is the central target of the intervention, taking precedence over reorganizing the discourse about the problem.
This reduction does not follow from explanation or from prescribing new behaviors. In TRI, the client is guided to sustain attention on the somatosensory sensation they had been avoiding, confronting in session, with the therapist’s mediation, the discomfort that organizes the pattern. The process is oriented by the function of the suffering in maintaining the current conditioning, not by causal investigation of its origin. The dissolution of this tension opens space for the learning that constitutes the therapy proper, organized in three dimensions: revelation of the pattern’s function, reelaboration of the meaning attributed to it, and reeducation, understood as the making of new decisions in practical life. The previous learning remains, integrated into more functional action schemas through understanding of the motivations that had kept it implicit.
TRI has been in clinical use and has trained therapists since 2019, but to date it has no theoretical proposition published in an independent form open to review by the scientific community, nor controlled studies in indexed journals. This gap is the responsibility of the person who developed the method. I correct it here, opening the conceptual foundations of the approach to the scrutiny of peers, therapists, and researchers, publicly and free of access charges.
I argue that TRI is a clinical model with a declared ontology, theoretically articulated constructs, and hypotheses formulated so as to be testable through observable behavioral and symptomatic outcomes, situated in the dialogue between contemporary affective neuroscience and brief psychotherapeutic practice.
The Tri Decalogue: Organization and Orientation
The reeducation described in the previous section depends on structured clinical reasoning: the therapist needs to identify which adaptive processes are in conflict, in which layer of the client’s experience this conflict is organized, and at what moment the intervention should occur. The TRI Decalogue consists of a structured epistemological organization designed to guide the therapist’s observation, hypothesis formulation, and clinical decision making. Its formulation results from the systematization of more than twenty years of direct clinical practice, supervision, and investigation in the field of affective and behavioral neuroscience. The ten principles operate as organizing axes of structural clinical reasoning, not as a rigid technical protocol, moral rules, or mechanically applicable prescriptions.
The central function of the Decalogue is to articulate the biological and social foundation of human behavior with practical operation in the consulting room. TRI organizes the Decalogue into five interdependent functional layers, which describe the progression of the model:
- Adaptive Base (First Principle): the foundation of the model, defining the biological mechanisms by which the nervous system organizes responses to contextual demands on the basis of energy conservation and functional efficiency.
- Organization of Experience (Second, Third, and Fourth Principles): the structuring of subjective experience from the adaptive base, describing how the person constructs narrative meaning, processes affective regulation under an amoral logic, and manifests their states in the body.
- Relational Axis (Fifth Principle): the center of the Decalogue, establishing social belonging as the primordial organizer of human adaptations and the source of shear tensions.
- Dynamics of Schema Maintenance (Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Principles): the temporal perpetuation of these adaptations through internal representations, automated patterns of interaction, and affective demands.
- Therapeutic Process (Ninth and Tenth Principles): the clinical intervention proper, in which therapist and client identify and modulate states of active shear in the present.
This layered arrangement allows the clinician to understand how suffering is structured from biological circuits to the interpersonal relation, orienting the intervention toward the functional dynamic that sustains the complaint.
First Principle: Adaptive Processes
The Adaptive Processes describe how the nervous system, in interaction with the body and the environment, organizes responses to maintain stability and viability throughout life (Maturana & Varela, 1980). In TRI, this principle starts from a biological constraint: the brain is metabolically costly, and the organism therefore tends to favor efficient, predictable, low-cost strategies when possible (Attwell & Laughlin, 2001).
Over the course of development, the nervous system registers regularities of the environment and the social context, transforming these regularities into response patterns. These patterns involve physiological, affective, cognitive, and behavioral components. They arise because they worked, in previous episodes, to reduce threat, maintain belonging, preserve energy, or sustain internal organization, not by moral criteria or deliberate reflection.
For this reason, in TRI the focus lies in identifying which adaptive function the reaction fulfilled and which constraints keep it active today. A pattern may have been useful in one context and become costly in another. The principle of the Adaptive Processes provides the map for understanding this transition: how responses become consolidated, why they become automated, and how they can be updated when they cease to be functional.
To organize this principle operationally, TRI describes five interlinked components of the Adaptive Processes: Economic Theory, Inhibition, Affective Charges, Affective Tensions, and Adaptation Movements.
Components of the Adaptive Processes
- Economic Theory: the brain’s capacity to manage energy resources so as to avoid waste and ensure the preservation of available energy. The brain, which consumes a significant share of the body’s energy, seeks ways to economize this resource, adapting its responses to operate efficiently and with the lowest possible energy expenditure (Attwell & Laughlin, 2001).
- Inhibition: the mechanism by which the brain regulates and controls its own reactions, containing certain impulses that, if expressed in inappropriate situations, could compromise the individual’s adaptation to the environment. This inhibitory control allows the nervous system to modulate its responses, adjusting to circumstances and avoiding unnecessary or harmful reactions.
- Affective Charges: the emotional experiences accumulated over the course of life, which influence and shape the individual’s response patterns. The Affective Charges represent the affective record of prior experiences, manifesting implicitly and automatically in the face of new contextual situations and directly affecting the reactions of the nervous system.
- Affective Tensions: the interaction between the Affective Charges and everyday demands, generating an internal state of tension in which the individual must constantly balance emotional needs against environmental requirements. The Affective Tensions are forces arising from conflicts between adaptive tendencies, determining responses to new and challenging events.
- Adaptation Movements: the actions and behaviors the nervous system generates in response to the Affective Tensions and to inhibited impulses. The Adaptation Movements are the organism’s responses aimed at reestablishing internal balance and adjusting the individual to the context in which they are embedded.
These five components organize the dynamics of the Adaptive Processes in TRI, describing the functioning of the brain as an adaptive organ directed at the conservation of resources and the psychosocial survival of the individual.
Affective Charges: Emotional Contrast, Social Learning, and Autopoiesis
In TRI, the Affective Charges refer to the accumulation of emotionally weighted experiences that influence the organization of response patterns throughout life. They participate in the consolidation of affective, cognitive, and behavioral habits, contributing to the way the individual interprets and reacts to contextual situations. The three main types of Affective Charges are Emotional Contrast, Social Learning, and Autopoiesis.
Emotional contrast refers to the diversity and variation of affective experiences over the course of life, contributing to the formation of a situated emotional repertoire. Emotions differ in intensity, duration, and frequency, and these variations influence the consolidation of response patterns. The four main dimensions of emotional contrast include:
- Necessity: the adaptive relevance of the emotion in a given context, such as fear in the face of imminent threat. Emotions associated with survival tend to mobilize faster, higher-priority responses.
- Intensity: the magnitude of the physiological and affective activation associated with the emotional experience. More intense states tend to increase the probability of consolidation of related patterns.
- Duration: the length of time the emotional state is maintained. Prolonged experiences favor greater stabilization of the circuits involved.
- Repetition: the recurrence of certain emotional experiences increases the probability of automation of the corresponding responses, making them more predictable and less dependent on deliberate processing (Wood & Neal, 2007).
These dimensions of emotional contrast organize momentary responses and consolidate adaptive tendencies over time. Intense, repeated experiences increase the probability of future activation of certain patterns, favoring faster, energetically economical responses in similar contexts.
Social learning organizes behavior in accordance with cultural norms, values, and expectations over the course of development, participating in the formation of patterns that regulate belonging, reputation, and relational predictability. This learning occurs in two forms:
- Explicit: involves the deliberate assimilation of rules, norms, and laws transmitted directly.
- Implicit: refers to the gradual incorporation of social patterns through repeated interaction, without the need for conscious reflection at each occurrence.
Already at birth, the melodic contour of crying reflects the prosody of the language heard during gestation (Mampe et al., 2009), and in the first months of life selective cortical responses to faces and bodies are already present in the ventral visual pathway (Kosakowski et al., 2022), which indicates a biological predisposition toward relational engagement. Over the course of development, the repetition of social experiences increases the probability of consolidating response patterns aligned with group expectations. This process favors the functional stabilization of circuits involved in social perception, emotional regulation, and decision making. Over time, socially adaptive responses become automated, reducing energy cost and increasing behavioral efficiency.
The concept of autopoiesis, formulated by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela, describes the capacity of living systems to maintain their internal organization through processes of self-regulation (Maturana & Varela, 1980). In the original biological formulation, it refers to the organization of living systems as units that produce and renew their own components, preserving structural identity over time in permanent coupling with the environment. In TRI, the concept is used to understand the functioning of the nervous system as an organization that preserves its adaptive patterns, in which the individual actively participates in maintaining their functional identity through their emotional and behavioral responses.
Autopoiesis in TRI emphasizes two central aspects:
- Self-regulation: the nervous system adjusts activation and response patterns in the face of new experiences, maintaining stability and functional continuity.
- Structural coupling: the individual reacts to the environment and simultaneously modifies it through their actions, influencing the context in which their own responses will be activated.
Autopoiesis describes the system’s tendency to conserve its organization even in the face of environmental perturbations. Emotional conflicts and persistent patterns express the system’s attempts to maintain coherence under conditions of adaptive tension. In TRI clinical practice, this reading shifts the focus from external linear causality to the analysis of how the system organizes and maintains its own patterns, understanding change as the updating of the functional organization that sustains the responses active in the present.
Affective Tensions
The Affective Tensions are the fourth dimension of the Adaptive Processes in TRI. They describe the states of functional incompatibility that arise when different response tendencies, consolidated over the life history, come into conflict in the face of new demands.
The concept draws analogically on the notion of tension from physics: when forces act in opposite directions, a state of structural stress is generated. In TRI, affective tension represents the discomfort that emerges when already stabilized patterns no longer fully fit the current context, requiring reorganization.
These tensions manifest at the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral levels, especially when components such as emotional contrast, social learning, and autopoiesis point in divergent directions. The result is a subjective experience of internal pressure that demands adaptation.
Because the nervous system operates under a logic of economy and preservation of organization, it tends to maintain previously consolidated patterns. When the context requires updating these patterns, the tension increases, reflecting the adaptive cost of functional reorganization.
Affective Shear
Affective shear is a concept derived from the Affective Tensions and used in TRI to describe the collision between Affective Charges organized in incompatible adaptive directions. The metaphor comes from physics: in shear, forces applied in opposite directions generate internal instability. In TRI, this image illustrates the functional conflict that arises when consolidated patterns come to point toward divergent responses in the face of the same situation.
Affective shear manifests when different Affective Charges, such as emotional contrast, social learning, and autopoiesis, activate response tendencies that cannot be executed simultaneously. On one side there may be the need to maintain belonging or safety. On the other, the demand for change or individual assertion may emerge. This collision increases the internal cost of the system, intensifies discomfort, and sustains avoidant behavior and suffering as long as the incompatibility remains active.
Shear is a dynamic state of functional incompatibility between Affective Charges, not a fixed structural entity. It exists as long as the conflict between these charges remains organized in opposition. When adaptive reorganization occurs, that is, when the charges cease to operate in conflicting directions, the collision ends and the state of shear ceases to exist. The identification of shear does not follow from the persistence or remission of reported suffering. It is established in the initial assessment, through independent coding of the two incompatible motivations named by the client, before any outcome monitoring.
In TRI clinical practice, the therapist identifies which Affective Charges are in conflict and how this collision sustains the current suffering. The goal of the therapeutic process is to reorganize these Adaptive Processes in tension. With the reorganization of the charges, the shear is reduced and the system recovers functional coherence.
Second Principle: Coherent Narrative
The coherent narrative organizes both the experience of suffering and the individual’s identity through three functional components:
- The identity of the self: the individual constructs narratives that sustain a relatively stable self-image. These stories select and organize past experiences so as to maintain internal coherence. Not all facts receive the same weight: those that reinforce the already established identity tend to be prioritized, preserving continuity and predictability.
- The social validation of experience: the narrative fulfills a relational function. By structuring what one feels into a comprehensible explanation, the individual facilitates recognition and belonging. Socially intelligible narratives increase the probability of external validation, reinforcing identity and bonds with the group.
- The maintenance of functional organization: the coherent narrative preserves already consolidated patterns of interpretation and response. Even when it limits new possibilities of understanding, it sustains the stability of the system, avoiding abrupt reorganizations of identity. The narrative is part of the very mechanism that maintains the prevailing adaptive organization, going beyond an explanation of subjectivity.
Euísmo
Euísmo (from the Portuguese eu, “I”) refers to the process of identity construction organized in linear-cause narratives, in which the individual explains their current functioning on the basis of past events. This formulation connects present traits, behaviors, or difficulties to earlier experiences, structuring a coherent explanation for one’s own identity. It is an interpretive organization that confers continuity and meaning on subjective experience.
For example, the person may report: “I am anxious because my parents were controlling” or “I take my anger out on food because I grew up in a tense environment.” These narratives establish direct causal relations between past and present, offering a stable, socially comprehensible justification for certain patterns of functioning.
Euísmo is influenced by cultural values, social expectations, and family interpretations that shape the reading of one’s own history. This established narrative simplifies complex experiences, privileging certain biographical elements and leaving others in the background. By associating a trait exclusively with a past event, the individual reduces the multiplicity of factors involved in current suffering, such as biological dispositions, contextual contingencies, and accumulated learning processes.
For example, the client may state: “I am distrustful because I was betrayed in the past.” This formulation fixes a present trait to a single historical cause, reinforcing a stable identity around that explanation. The narrative operates as a stabilizer of identity, reducing the dynamics of the problem to a reading centered on a single causal chain.
Third Principle: Amoral Brain
In TRI, the concept of the Amoral Brain rests on the recognition that the nervous system operates according to strictly adaptive criteria. Its responses are organized on the basis of energy conservation and the maintenance of the organism’s viability in the face of environmental demands (Damasio, 2018).
Anger, fear, and avoidance rest on defensive and survival circuits that constitute biological patterns of activation, without moral category, and that increased the probability of protection, defense, or relational regulation in the face of threat or loss (LeDoux, 2019).
The human brain integrates multiple circuits for relevance detection and autonomic regulation. This integration can generate states of tension when automatic response tendencies collide with internalized social norms or with the subject’s deliberate goals. This conflict results from functional incompatibilities between different levels of adaptive processing, with no relation to intrinsic immorality.
In TRI clinical practice, understanding the brain as amoral implies suspending moral judgments about primary affective states. Anger, fear, or defensive impulses are expressions of adaptive organization, not character flaws. The therapeutic focus concentrates on the function of these states within the individual’s present dynamic, analyzing behavior under a functional, contextual logic.
In the TRI paradigm, the concept of love departs from romantic notions or moral idealizations and corresponds to the adaptive force that establishes and maintains the bond, sustained by the neurohormonal systems of attachment, in particular the oxytocinergic system associated with biobehavioral synchrony between partners (Feldman, 2012). For a social mammal, preserving inclusion in the reference group is a primary biological need as vital as physical homeostasis. The amoral brain adapts its physiological and behavioral functioning to secure this belonging, even when maintaining the bond requires functional sacrifices or generates individual suffering.
This dynamic is directly articulated with the affective charges of social learning and autopoiesis. Through social learning (Bandura, 1977), the individual assimilates, predominantly in implicit form, the rules of coexistence, expectations, and roles required by their relational network, transforming these contingencies into automated schemas of conduct. Through autopoiesis (Maturana & Varela, 1980), the nervous system seeks to preserve the coherence of its identity organization within the shared context. Love thus manifests in patterns that may favor mutual safety and development (functional belonging) or in bonds in which acceptance depends on self-suppression and avoidance of discomfort (costly belonging).
TRI clinical intervention seeks to understand which belonging-preservation function these bonding patterns performed in the subject’s history, without disqualifying them. By identifying how these roles were consolidated through social learning, the therapeutic process makes it possible to reorganize these dynamics, allowing the transition to more flexible, functional forms of bonding.
Fourth Principle: The Body Is the Stage
The fourth principle of TRI holds that body and mind form an inseparable functional unit, in which “mind” is simply the name for the functioning of the brain and its subjectivity. The approach adopts a monist position, in which emotional, cognitive, and physiological processes are understood as integrated expressions of a single biopsychosocial system (Carvalho & Damasio, 2021).
Affective states do not occur in an isolated mental space, and somatic responses do not represent symbolic translations of hidden conflicts. Emotions involve measurable physiological changes, such as variations in heart rate, breathing pattern, muscle tone, and neuroendocrine release. These bodily responses are part of the emotional phenomenon itself as it unfolds.
Contemporary research confirms the continuous integration between neural circuits and peripheral systems. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis participates in the stress response, while structures such as the anterior insula and the anterior cingulate cortex participate in monitoring and integrating visceral states in the mapping of interoceptive salience (Craig, 2009; Critchley & Harrison, 2013). What the subject experiences affectively is inseparable from what occurs in their bodily physiology.
In TRI, stating that the body is the stage means recognizing that suffering manifests bodily because visceral and muscular responses express adaptive states organized by the organism. Chronic muscle tension, altered breathing, fatigue, or visceral discomfort are situated physiological responses, associated with biological vulnerabilities, conditioning, and contextual contingencies.
In clinical practice, this understanding orients the therapist to take bodily manifestations as direct indicators of the present adaptive state. Emotions are understood as transient physiological patterns, while feelings correspond to the subjective perception and interpretation of these states (Damasio, 2018). Body-centered clinical work consists of modulating the system’s integrated responses through interoceptive attention, without seeking symbolic decodings of physical pathologies.
The principle of the Body Is the Stage departs from the classical notion of somatic conversion and from psychosomatic readings that attribute mechanical, linear causality between specific emotions and physical diseases. Historically derived from humoral theory and consolidated in the Freudian proposition of symbolic transposition of repressed conflict onto the somatic organ (Laplanche & Pontalis, 2001), this interpretation simplifies multifactorial phenomena and promotes undue blaming of subjects for their illness. TRI does not assume that affective states such as anger or resentment directly cause specific organic pathologies.
The model rests on monism and the biopsychosocial perspective (Engel, 1977; Slavich, 2020), understanding subjective experience, thoughts, emotions, and physiological states as integrated levels of a single living system. The visceral, muscular, and autonomic manifestations observed in session are situated biological responses of adaptation and stress regulation, not embodied symbols of hidden contents.
Suffering is organized in the active bodily experience that sustains avoidant behavior in the present. The uncomfortable somatic sensation precedes and directs the construction of the client’s explanatory narrative. TRI intervention focuses on identifying and interoceptively modulating this ongoing physiological state, understanding that all psychological experience is embodied and that reorganizing the present functional pattern modifies the subject’s own narrative, with no promise of medical cure for structural pathological conditions.
Fifth Principle: Sacrifice for Love of One’s Peers
The fifth principle occupies the central position in the TRI Decalogue (the relational junction), establishing social belonging as the primordial organizer of human adaptations (Dunbar, 1998). The nervous system developed under the pressure of group living: being accepted meant protection and access to resources, while exclusion amounted to extreme vulnerability. As Humberto Maturana’s biology of cognition demonstrates, the social phenomenon is grounded in the dynamics of mutual acceptance and everyday coexistence, in which the affective bond operates as a structuring condition of the organism’s very survival (Maturana & Varela, 1984).
This need for connection has a documented neurobiological basis. The perception of social isolation and the experience of rejection mobilize autonomic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses, as well as regions partially coinciding with those recruited by physical pain, such as the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula (Cacioppo & Patrick, 2008; Eisenberger & Lieberman, 2004), and endogenous opioid systems participate in the regulation of bonding and the response to separation, above all in animal models (Panksepp, 1998). The interpretation of this coincidence as a shared circuit is disputed: multivariate pattern analyses indicate distinguishable neural representations for physical pain and social rejection within these same regions (Woo et al., 2014). For the purposes of this model, the relevant point does not depend on the identity of the substrates: relational disconnection is processed by the organism as a threat to its integrity.
In childhood, the bond with caregiving figures is a condition of biological viability, not an option. To preserve belonging, the nervous system develops early adaptations, such as inhibition of emotional responses, hypervigilance, or submission. Over the course of development, these patterns become consolidated as relational schemas that persist into adult life.
For TRI, suffering results from the adaptive tension between the need to preserve the bond with the group, whether objective or subjective, and the demand to move away from the discomfort generated by that same relation. Because the organism does not discard belonging, affective shear sets in: incompatible motivations in continuous functional conflict. Therapeutic intervention favors the reorganization of the adaptive schemas that sustain the dysfunctional sacrifice, allowing the reduction of the shear active in the present, without seeking to break the bonds.
Sixth Principle: Representational Systems
The sixth principle establishes that psychological functioning results from multiple modes of functional activation organized over the course of development, not from a single, immutable psychic center. These arrangements operate as internal working models (Bowlby, 1982; Craik, 1943) that represent relational patterns, threat appraisal, and strategies for preserving belonging.
Faced with environmental demands, the brain activates the representational system most compatible with the subject’s prior experience, prioritizing internal stability and economy of resources. Observable behavior and immediate emotional responses constitute expressions of these previously consolidated matrices. Clinical intervention focuses on identifying and rendering flexible these organizing matrices active in the present, not on the merely superficial correction of isolated conduct.
In TRI, identity is a semiotic, autopoietic organization in continuous updating, not a fixed substance (Maturana & Varela, 1980). The nervous system processes patterns of signification constructed at the interface between neurophysiological predispositions, bonding history, and immediate contextual demands. Neural networks associated with social cognition and affective regulation modulate identity according to the perception of acceptance or exclusion in the group.
This dynamic is grounded in the biopsychosocial model (Engel, 1977), in which the neurobiological, psychological, and relational dimensions coexist interdependently. Suffering reflects the functional rigidity with which these matrices of meaning operate in the face of present contingencies. Therapeutic work seeks to map the active narratives and relational schemas, expanding the subject’s functional repertoire without disorganizing their adaptive coherence.
Seventh Principle: Performance Scripts
The seventh principle defines performance scripts as automated patterns of behavior, cognition, and affect consolidated over the course of development (Schank & Abelson, 1977; Tomkins, 1979). They constitute the direct convergence between the conditioning and functional-economy mechanisms of the adaptive base (First Principle) and the biological imperative of preserving group belonging (Fifth Principle).
These schemas do not represent mere memories of isolated episodes. They result from contingencies reinforced in bonding dynamics, in which the nervous system learned which responses guaranteed relational stability and protection in the face of threat. Modes of acting such as compulsive pleasing, silence in the face of conflict, or hypervigilant reaction operate as implicit functional sequences triggered automatically by similar contextual cues.
Performance scripts constitute efficient adaptive solutions for the context in which they were formed. The clinical difficulty arises when these patterns persist rigidly in adult life, being executed even when the current environment no longer requires that survival strategy. The nervous system maintains the pattern because it prioritizes the stability and predictability that guaranteed the bond in the past.
TRI therapeutic work shifts the causal investigation from the past to the organizational function in the present. The intervention investigates the adaptive purpose the script fulfills in maintaining current relationships, without focusing on reconstituting the original event. Change results from expanding the client’s response repertoire and rendering these performance matrices flexible, reducing behavioral rigidity without compromising internal coherence.
Eighth Principle: Affective Demand
The eighth principle describes the organism’s tendency to conserve its functional organization in the face of perturbation (Maturana & Varela, 1980), which is expressed, at the affective level, in the preservation of consolidated states as a reference of stability. Affective demand is not to be confused with cognitive schemas, core beliefs, or the deliberate pursuit of episodic emotions such as anger, fear, or sadness. Emotions are transient psychophysiological responses. Affective demand operates as a functional attractor that organizes the system’s internal homeostasis.
The nervous system prioritizes the coherence of what is known over the instability generated by novel arrangements. For this reason, the individual tends to engage in relational contexts and to adopt stances that confirm this baseline affective configuration (such as roles of hyper-responsibility, rejection, or defensive self-sufficiency), maintaining the system’s stability in already known configurations, even though the physiological cost of this prolonged maintenance corresponds to what McEwen (1998) describes as allostatic load. Affective demand is a mechanism for preserving the subject’s integrity, developed in specific adaptation scenarios, not a pathological failure or a self-destructive compulsion. Suffering sets in when this consolidated internal organization comes into conflict with the contingencies and requirements of the current context.
From this collision between the need to preserve known affective coherence and the demand to adapt to new contingencies follows affective shear. In TRI, clinical work does not seek to suppress affective demand or block emotional expression. The intervention concentrates on mapping the original adaptive function of this configuration and promoting its progressive flexibilization, enabling new modes of regulation without disorganizing the system’s stability.
Ninth Principle: Mediative Process
The ninth principle belongs to the operational field of TRI, describing the clinical intervention structured on the affective shear active in the present. The process does not investigate past biographical events or seek retrospective causal reconstruction. The therapist acts as a mediator between simultaneous adaptive motivations and strategies in functional conflict within the client’s own system, without the directive imposition of solutions or external interpretations.
The mediative process is articulated in three integrated, simultaneous axes, differentiated only for didactic purposes: imagery, triangulation, and reintegrative catharsis.
- Imagery: consists of directing attention to the immediate interoceptive experience, reducing the predominance of rationalized narrative discourse. By focusing on present bodily sensations, the client’s system projects sets of implicit learnings and automated scripts into perceptible representations, making conditioned affective responses accessible.
- Triangulation: establishes a functional arrangement between the therapist, the client, and the emergent representation. The representation is treated strictly as a bundle of consolidated adaptive strategies, not as an autonomous entity or a mythical character. This arrangement allows clarification of the motivations in tension, the demands being preserved, and the costs of maintaining this pattern in the present.
- Reintegrative Catharsis: departs from the hydraulic model of discharge or disorganized catharsis, being defined by the verbal, logical, structured explicitation of the strategies and intentions that had been operating implicitly.
The integration of these axes provides mediated exposure with technical support, promoting the reduction of the conditioned aversive response and of affective shear, in an arrangement analogous in form, but not in theoretical grounding, to the imagery work of schema therapy (Young et al., 2003). The clinical gain results from the reorganization of functional strategies in the present, without depending on suggestion, dramatization, or symbolic interpretation.
Tenth Principle: The Problem Is Not the Problem
The tenth principle acts as the epistemological lens of clinical practice, establishing that the complaint reported by the client (the perceived problem) does not necessarily correspond to the adaptive dynamic that sustains the suffering. Manifestations such as anxiety, depressed mood, procrastination, or relational conflicts constitute elaborations of the coherent narrative (Second Principle) to justify the felt discomfort. The clinical focus lies on the functional dynamic that keeps the shear active in the present, articulated with the system’s affective demand.
The intervention seeks the reduction of the shear between conflicting motivations, not the direct suppression of the symptom or the medical cure of pathologies. Attempts to intervene only on the visible symptom tend to generate temporary relief without altering the stability of the system, which may reorganize the functional tension into another expressive route. When the shear is worked through and reduced, the symptomatic response loses its regulatory function and tends toward functional remission.
The tenth principle establishes ethical boundaries for the intervention, avoiding the undue psychologization of objective reality. Not all discomfort results from internal affective shear. TRI understands the human being under the biopsychosocial model (Engel, 1977), recognizing concrete structural, economic, biological, and environmental determinants.
In scenarios of material deprivation, interpersonal violence, social oppression, or physical vulnerability, suffering reflects biological, adaptive responses proportional to the hostility of the environment. In these conditions, physical protection, medical assistance, and social intervention on the context precede any psychotherapeutic work. TRI clinical mediation is restricted to situations in which internal tensions and incompatible motivations amplify the functional impact of contingencies, preserving epistemic honesty about the limits of psychotherapy.
Testable Hypotheses and Falsifiability Criteria
Hypothesis 1.
General efficacy on the clinical complaint
In adults whose eligibility is determined at initial screening, before the intervention, the brief, focal TRI protocol produces a clinically significant reduction in the intensity of the principal complaint, greater than that obtained in an active control condition matched for contact time, assessed by psychometric instrument before and after treatment. The hypothesis will be refuted if the between-group difference does not reach a clinically relevant magnitude, defined before data collection.
Hypothesis 2.
Mechanism of change through interoceptive confrontation
The reduction of avoidant behavior associated with the complaint results from mediated somatosensory confrontation in session, combined with understanding of the pattern’s function, and not from mere rational explanation about the origin of the suffering. Affective shear functions here as the proposed explanatory mechanism for this change, not as a directly measured outcome. This reduction does not presuppose the disappearance of emotions proportional to the client’s real context, such as grief or fear in the face of serious illness. The target is the functional conflict superimposed on these emotions, not the legitimate emotion itself. The hypothesis will be refuted if clients who receive only rational explanation, without mediated interoceptive confrontation, show an equivalent reduction in avoidant behavior, measured by a standardized psychometric scale or by a behavioral record of avoidance.
Hypothesis 3.
Reeducation and autonomy at follow-up
The resolution of the functional conflict in session enables the client’s reeducation, translating into an expanded behavioral repertoire and more autonomous decisions within the real limits imposed by the client’s context, such as age, economic or family dependence, and structural conditions, maintained at follow-up assessments at 3 and 6 months. The hypothesis will be falsified if the client shows immediate symptomatic relief at the end of the session but relapses into avoidant behavior and the original suffering within this period, without this relapse being explained by an adverse change in the external context.
Current State of Evidence, Epistemological Limits, and Methodological Constraints
TRI is at an early stage of development according to the criteria established by Rounsaville et al. (2001) for the development of behavioral therapies, corresponding to the interval between theoretical formulation and the production of controlled pilot evidence. It therefore does not meet the criteria for empirically supported treatment defined by Chambless and Hollon (1998), which require randomized trials replicated by independent teams. This position is the model’s actual stage, not a provisional condition by omission, and communicating it precisely is part of the epistemological commitment assumed in the Paradigm.
Two levels of evidence must be distinguished when analyzing the model. The first is the evidence supporting the mechanisms imported from other areas of neuroscience and psychology: the processing of social rejection as biological threat (Cacioppo & Patrick, 2008; Eisenberger & Lieberman, 2004), the role of interoception in subjective experience (Craig, 2009), and the efficacy of brief psychodynamic psychotherapies for common conditions (Abbass et al., 2014).
The second is the evidence on TRI as an integrated model, articulating these mechanisms into a specific clinical protocol. That evidence does not exist. None of the cited components has been tested within the TRI design, and the plausibility of each piece in isolation does not substitute for testing the whole.
To date, TRI has no controlled or randomized clinical studies and no independent meta-analyses. The available data are observational in nature and derive from systematized clinical practice, without a comparison group, without standardized psychometric instruments in all cases, and without verification by a team external to the author. This limitation directly affects the interpretation of the three hypotheses formulated in the previous section: any improvement observed in the current application of the protocol can be explained by confounders common to clinical practice, the therapeutic alliance, expectation of improvement, regression to the mean, and concurrent changes in the client’s life context, and cannot be attributed to the proposed mechanism without a design that isolates these variables.
There is also a limit of another nature, which follows from the very structure of what is being tested, not from methodological failure. The functional reorganization obtained in session does not occur in isolation from the client’s real conditions of life: personal possibilities, family context, economic conditions, work environment, and cultural aspects. An adolescent who is financially dependent on their parents may reduce internal shear without this translating, in the short term, into observable behavioral autonomy, because the margin of action remains limited by the context, not by the persistence of the pattern. For this reason, the outcomes of an intervention cannot be predicted in a linear or precise manner over the medium and long term, and the absence of visible change in a given domain of the client’s life does not by itself invalidate the hypothesis of functional reorganization obtained in session.
TRI does not qualify as consolidated institutional science in the terms of the classical hierarchy of evidence in medicine and experimental psychology. Nor does it qualify as pseudoscience according to Hansson’s (2013) demarcation criteria, already discussed in the Paradigm: it does not resort to untestable entities, does not protect central hypotheses through ad hoc explanation, and does not present itself as definitive or immune to criticism. The correct position is that of a practice undergoing theoretical consolidation, with explicit hypotheses and declared refutation criteria, still without the body of evidence that would allow claims of proven efficacy.
This condition delimits what this article can and cannot assert. It does not demonstrate that TRI works. It declares, with sufficient clarity to be tested and eventually refuted, what TRI asserts about itself. The distinction between these two things is what differentiates a theoretical proposition from the promotion of one’s own method, and its explicit maintenance throughout the text is a condition for the article to be read with the seriousness the proposal intends to deserve.
Agenda of Experimental Designs
The formalization of TRI as a theoretical model aims to support empirical investigations conducted by independent research groups, academic centers, and health services (Rounsaville et al., 2001). Because they involve human participants for research purposes, the three designs proposed below require prior submission to Plataforma Brasil and approval by a research ethics committee (CEP/Conep), under the Brazilian research ethics review system, regardless of the stage at which they come to be conducted. The agenda presents potential methodological designs for putting the three formulated hypotheses to the test:
- Investigation of clinical efficacy and effect size (linked to Hypothesis 1): the conduct of pilot clinical trials with comparison groups (such as waiting list or treatment as usual) is suggested, in community samples presenting circumscribed clinical complaints (performance anxiety, social phobia, or behavioral avoidance). The design should ensure strict exclusion criteria for populations under active violence or acute material deprivation, using validated psychometric inventories before and after treatment to estimate the effect size of the focal intervention.
- Component dismantling studies (linked to Hypothesis 2): to determine whether the active factor of change lies in interoceptive confrontation or in psychoeducational guidance, the application of dismantling designs is recommended. Comparison between a full TRI protocol and a purely rational control condition (focused on cognitive explanation of the pattern, without the somatic mediative process) will make it possible to isolate the causal impact of the somatosensory route on the reduction of the conditioned aversive response.
- Longitudinal cohort follow-up and contextual monitoring (linked to Hypothesis 3): the sustainability of therapeutic gains can be assessed through prospective follow-up studies at 3 and 6 months. The use of behavioral autonomy scales and the recording of stressful life events throughout the follow-up period are recommended, allowing discrimination of the maintenance of the adaptive repertoire in the face of possible contextual and environmental shocks.
Final Considerations: Tri as a Testable Theoretical Proposition
This article has presented Implicit Reintegration Therapy (TRI) as a clinical model with a declared ontology, constructs systematically articulated throughout the Decalogue, and hypotheses formulated in refutable terms. The approach starts from the premise that psychological suffering that does not stem from direct material deprivation is organized as affective shear between adaptive processes oriented toward individual survival and the preservation of social bonds. By conceiving of the body as the primary stage of this affective tension, the model shifts the focus from the retrospective reconstruction of biography to the regulation of the somatosensory pattern active in the present.
The brief intervention proposed by TRI uses mediated interoceptive confrontation and imagery as a route of access to implicit memories and automatic conditioning. Desensitization of the aversive response enables the logical explicitation of the pattern and opens space for the client’s reeducation, translated into a more flexible behavioral repertoire and into decision making compatible with their real conditions of life.
By formalizing its constructs in three clinical hypotheses accompanied by explicit refutation criteria, TRI departs from hermetic conceptual systems and places itself at the disposal of scientific scrutiny. This article organizes, systematically and publicly, the foundations of a practice in clinical use since 2019, but it does not constitute proof of efficacy. The absence of controlled studies, discussed in the section on the current state of evidence, remains the most relevant limit of the model’s present stage, and the efficacy of the approach, the specificity of its active mechanism, and the sustainability of its results remain open empirical questions, subject to refutation by future investigation. The value of this formulation lies in offering a coherent, theoretically delimited, methodologically testable model for the field of contemporary psychotherapies.
Authorship Declaration: Author 1—Conceptualization, theoretical development, formulation of the clinical hypotheses and falsifiability criteria, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing of the original draft, review and editing of the manuscript. The author is the sole author of this manuscript and assumes full responsibility for its content.
Funding Declaration: This research received no specific grant or funding from public funding agencies, private entities, or third-sector organizations, and was conducted entirely with the author’s own resources.
Declaration on Data Availability: This is a theoretical article. It reports no primary empirical data, and no dataset was generated or analyzed. All content underlying the arguments presented is described in the manuscript itself and in the cited references.
Declaration of Conflict of Interest: The author declares a potential conflict of interest of an institutional and financial nature. The author is the original developer of Implicit Reintegration Therapy (TRI) and the founder of Instituto Kraisch, a private entity responsible for the education, training, and certification of therapists in the approach. The conceptual foundations, ontological structure, and falsifiability criteria described in this manuscript are intended to allow independent evaluation and replication of the model by researchers with no ties to that institution.
Declaration of Use of Artificial Intelligence: The author declares that generative artificial intelligence tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript. The language model Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) was used as a research and writing assistant across all sections of the article, including cross-checking of bibliographic references, detection of conceptual or methodological inconsistencies, and assistance in the syntactic structuring of running text from materials provided by the author. The Perplexity Sonar 2 model was employed in complementary stages of exploratory search and preliminary drafting of passages subsequently revised. The Consensus tool (Consensus.app) supported the initial survey of evidence in the literature, and bibliographic reference management was performed in Zotero, integrated with Notion. All conceptual content, the formulation of the clinical hypotheses, the theoretical decisions, and the final version of the text were conceived, revised, and approved entirely by the author, who assumes full responsibility for the manuscript.
References
- Abbass, A. A.; Kisely, S. R.; Town, J. M.; Leichsenring, F.; Driessen, E.; De Maat, S.; Gerber, A.; Dekker, J.; Rabung, S.; Rusalovska, S.; Crowe, E. Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014(7), Article CD004687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Archer, M. S. Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach; Cambridge University Press, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tjak, J. G. L.; Davis, M. L.; Morina, N.; Powers, M. B.; Smits, J. A. J.; Emmelkamp, P. M. G. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychother. Psychosom. 2015, 84(1), 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Attwell, D.; Laughlin, S. B. An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2001, 21(10), 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bandura, A. Social learning theory; Prentice Hall, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Barrett, L. F. The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2017, 12(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beck, A. T.; Rush, A. J.; Shaw, B. F.; Emery, G. Cognitive therapy of depression; Guilford Press, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Bhaskar, R. A realist theory of science; Routledge, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouton, M. E. Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learn. Mem. 2004, 11(5), 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bowlby, J. Attachment and loss. In Attachment, 2nd ed.; Basic Books, 1982; Vol. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Cacioppo, J. T.; Patrick, W. Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection; W. W. Norton & Company, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Carvalho, G. B.; Damasio, A. Interoception and the origin of feelings: A new synthesis. BioEssays 2021, 43(6), 2000261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chambless, D. L.; Hollon, S. D. Defining empirically supported therapies. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1998, 66(1), 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Craig, A. D. How do you feel, now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10(1), 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Craik, K. J. W. The nature of explanation; Cambridge University Press, 1943. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J. W.; Creswell, J. D. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th ed.; SAGE Publications, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Critchley, H. D.; Harrison, N. A. Visceral influences on brain and behavior. Neuron 2013, 77(4), 624–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crotty, M. The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process; SAGE Publications, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Damasio, A. R. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain; G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Damasio, A. The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of cultures; Pantheon Books, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Dunbar, R. I. M. The social brain hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. 1998, 6(5), 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenberger, N. I.; Lieberman, M. D. Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8(7), 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Engel, G. L. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977, 196(4286), 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feldman, R. Oxytocin and social affiliation in humans. Horm. Behav. 2012, 61(3), 380–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Freud, S. O inconsciente [The unconscious]. In S. Freud, Obras completas. In Introdução ao narcisismo, ensaios de metapsicologia e outros textos (1914–1916) [Complete works, volume 12: Introduction to narcissism, essays on metapsychology, and other texts (1914–1916)]; (Original work published 1915); Companhia das Letras., 2010; volume 12, pp. 99–150. [Google Scholar]
- Hansson, S. O. Defining pseudoscience and science. In Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem; Pigliucci, M., Boudry, M., Eds.; University of Chicago Press, 2013; pp. 61–77. [Google Scholar]
- Hofmann, S. G.; Asnaani, A.; Vonk, I. J. J.; Sawyer, A. T.; Fang, A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cogn. Ther. Res. 2012, 36(5), 427–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knobel, M. Psicoterapia breve [Brief psychotherapy], 2nd ed.; EPU, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Kosakowski, H. L.; Cohen, M. A.; Takahashi, A.; Keil, B.; Kanwisher, N.; Saxe, R. Selective responses to faces, scenes, and bodies in the ventral visual pathway of infants. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32(2), 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions; University of Chicago Press, 1962. [Google Scholar]
- Laplanche, J.; Pontalis, J.-B. Vocabulário da psicanálise [The language of psychoanalysis], 4th ed.; Martins Fontes, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- LeDoux, J. E. The deep history of ourselves: The four-billion-year story of how we got conscious brains; Viking, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Mampe, B.; Friederici, A. D.; Christophe, A.; Wermke, K. Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19(23), 1994–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maturana, H. R.; Varela, F. J. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living; D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maturana, H. R.; Varela, F. J. A árvore do conhecimento: As bases biológicas da compreensão humana [The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding]; Palas Athena, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- McEwen, B. S. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338(3), 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panksepp, J. Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions; Oxford University Press, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Pigliucci, M.; Boudry, M. (Eds.) Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem; University of Chicago Press, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Pike, K. L. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior, 2nd ed.; Mouton, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Rounsaville, B. J.; Carroll, K. M.; Onken, L. S. A stage model of behavioral therapies research: Getting started and moving on from stage I. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2001, 8(2), 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schank, R. C.; Abelson, R. P. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Seth, A. K.; Friston, K. J. Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371(1708), 20160007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shedler, J. The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Am. Psychol. 2010, 65(2), 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skinner, B. F. Science and human behavior; Macmillan, 1953. [Google Scholar]
- Slavich, G. M. Social safety theory: A biologically based evolutionary perspective on life stress, health, and behavior. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2020, 16, 265–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Squire, L. R.; Dede, A. J. O. Conscious and unconscious memory systems. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7(3), a021667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tomkins, S. S. Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation; Howe, H. E., Dienstbier, R. A., Eds.; University of Nebraska Press, 1979; Vol. 26, pp. 201–236. [Google Scholar]
- Vygotsky, L. S. A formação social da mente: O desenvolvimento dos processos psicológicos superiores [Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes]; Martins Fontes, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Woo, C.-W.; Koban, L.; Kross, E.; Lindquist, M. A.; Banich, M. T.; Ruzic, L.; Andrews-Hanna, J. R.; Wager, T. D. Separate neural representations for physical pain and social rejection. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wood, W.; Neal, D. T. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 114(4), 843–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Young, J. E.; Klosko, J. S.; Weishaar, M. E. Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide; Guilford Press, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.