Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Colletotrichum Species Associated with Citrus: Disease Biology, Global Diversity, Pathogenicity, and Biosecurity Implications

Submitted:

20 August 2026

Posted:

21 August 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Citrus is an important fruit crop worldwide and Colletotrichum species are important pathogens of this crop. Colletotrichum species infect a wide range of citrus tissue such as leaves, twigs, flower petals, immature and mature fruit, causing substantial losses in yield, fruit quality, and marketability. This review is a critical assessment of the major Colletotrichum species associated with citrus diseases, their global diversity, distribution, and biosecurity implications. This review also identifies areas in need of further research. Thirty-nine Colletotrichum species have been reported in association with citrus globally. Most Colletotrichum species are plant pathogens, while several are saprobes or exhibit endophytic or latent lifestyles. They also vary in host range, aggressiveness, and environmental adaptation. Several species can infect citrus hosts or tissues beyond those from which they were originally isolated, while some also infect plants from other genera. The nature of infection by Colletotrichum species highlights the need to include non-wound inoculation in bioassays designed to assess the ability of Colletotrichum isolates to penetrate the cuticle and epidermis and cause infection. Accurate identification, pathogenicity testing, and rapid molecular detection are therefore important for disease management, quarantine inspection, and plant biosecurity risk assessment.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The genus Colletotrichum represents important fungal plant pathogens globally and is also capable of causing disease in animals [1]. Currently, the classification system of Colletotrichum comprises 20 species complexes with more than 340 Colletotrichum species. While a few species can be host-specific, the majority infect a wide range of host species [1,2,3,4,5]. Until recently, the host range of Colletotrichum species encompassed over 760 plant species belonging to more than 30 plant genera in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions [1,6,7]. Among the host species, dicotyledonous plants were the most frequently recorded, accounting for more than 77%, followed by monocotyledonous hosts (20%), gymnosperms (1.4%), and ferns and mosses, which were seldom recorded [1].
Colletotrichum species infect Citrus leaves, twigs, flower petals, and cause disease on immature crops and fruit before harvest, as well as on mature crop and fruit products post-harvest, negatively affecting yield quantity, fruit quality and marketability [2,8,9]. An epidemic of Colletotrichum in the field can easily lead to large losses in agricultural production and therefore cause significant economic losses for farmers [10]. Colletotrichum species are also isolated from healthy plant tissues and recognized as being in endophytic or latent life stages, or from dead plant tissues and recognized as saprobes [2,3]. Latent infection occurs when the pathogen enters the host tissue and remains inactive, then causes disease as the host’s physiology changes due to tissue maturation or exposure to abiotic stresses [2,3,11]. Latent infection is more frequently found in fruits, where the pathogen infects the fruit when it is immature and causes disease when the fruit starts to ripen, especially during the post-harvest period [12].
Citrus plants are perennial trees in the family Rutaceae that prefer to grow in areas with consistent sunlight and sufficient water [13]. Mandarin (C. reticulata), pomelo (C. maxima) and citron (C. medica) are the three ancestral species of the genus Citrus, and all commercially cultivated Citrus species are hybrids or introgressions between these three species [14,15]. As an important fruit crop worldwide, citrus is now mainly produced in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, Chile, Costa Rica, Egypt, the European Union, Guatemala, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, South Africa, Turkey, the United States, and Vietnam [16]. Grapefruit (Citrus × paradisi), lemon (Citrus limon), lime (Citrus aurantiifolia), tangerine/mandarin (Citrus reticulata) and orange (Citrus × sinensis) are the most popular species produced commercially [17]. Global citrus production for 2023/24 was estimated to be 102.6 million tons [16].
The high adaptability and wide host range of Colletotrichum species contribute to their persistence in citrus production regions. Accurate taxonomy of Colletotrichum species and knowledge of the pathogen’s pathogenic capacity on different hosts have important implications for plant biosecurity risk management and the development of integrated control strategies. Hence, this review aims to provide a critical assessment of the major Colletotrichum species associated with citrus diseases, their global diversity, distribution, and biosecurity implications, as well as to identify areas in need of further research.

2. Disease Cycle and Infection Strategies of Colletotrichum Species

Colletotrichum species have endophytic, latent or quiescent, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic lifestyles [2]. These fungi employ specialised infection strategies to infect host plants. Knowledge of the disease cycle and infection strategies of Colletotrichum species is essential for managing potential plant biosecurity risk and developing integrated control strategies.
Colletotrichum species favour warm temperatures between 25°C and 28°C with high air humidity, and become inactive under extremely low or high temperatures, low air humidity, or direct sunlight [2,18]. The pathogen survives unfavourable conditions, such as winter, by colonising plant seeds, twigs, leaf litter or alternative hosts. When environmental conditions become suitable, asexual fruiting structures (acervuli) are formed which release conidiospores however, in some species sexual fruiting structures (perithecia) also develop and release ascospores. Released spores spread to nearby plant organs through rain splash, wind, or irrigation, germinate, and form infection structures (appressoria). Penetration pegs are formed from the appressoria, where high mechanical pressure is applied to enable penetration of the host cuticle and epidermal cell walls [19,20,21,22]. Some species in the acutatum complex have also been reported to enter leaves through stomata or wounds [23,24].
After successful penetration, most Colletotrichum species infect host plants through a hemibiotrophic strategy, which begins with a biotrophic phase and then transitions to a necrotrophic phase [2,20]. During the biotrophic phase, infection vesicles and primary hyphae develop inside the infected cells without causing necrosis. Eventually, the pathogen transitions to the necrotrophic phase, during which secondary hyphae develop and spread to adjacent cells, leading to host tissue necrosis [25].
Colletotrichum species employ a diverse range of infection strategies to restrain host defence mechanisms and facilitate colonisation [26]. The cuticle is an important physical barrier of plants that prevents initial infection [27,28]. Appressorium formation is an important strategy for most Colletotrichum species. Glycerol and other osmolytes accumulate in the appressorium, generating substantial turgor pressure of up to 8 MPa, which forces a narrow penetration peg to mechanically penetrate the host cuticle. Mutant Colletotrichum species that form fewer appressoria have been shown to have decreased pathogenicity [29]. The production of cutinase is also a critical strategy during the early stages of infection. Auyong et al. (2015) found that Colletotrichum truncatum produced cutinase to assist the infection of chilli fruit and soybean leaves, and that the pathogenicity of the pathogen decreased when the cutinase gene was silenced [30]. After successful penetration, Colletotrichum species produce pathogen-encoded small secreted proteins (SSPs) to manipulate host metabolism or suppress defence signalling, thereby evading host immune responses during the initial biotrophic phase [31].
Another major defence mechanism of host plants is to enhance structural defence by reinforcing the cell wall, mainly through the accumulation of polysaccharides such as cellulose, hemicelluloses, and pectins [32]. In the citrus cell walls, lignin may accumulate after pathogen penetration to enhance resistance [27,33]. Gan et al. (2013) found that Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. orbiculare produce a large number of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), including cellulose-degrading and pectin-degrading enzymes, to degrade these polysaccharides and assist hyphal expansion [34].
Some Colletotrichum species remain dormant after entering plant tissue and cause disease once the host is under stress or environmental conditions become suitable for the pathogen to complete its life cycle [11]. The physiological maturity of the host can play an important role in disease development, as physiological and biochemical changes reduce defence activity and increase sugar content, thereby facilitating infection by Colletotrichum species [35,36,37].
Quiescence is frequently observed in Colletotrichum infections of fruit, in which fungal development is temporarily arrested until the host tissue ripens or reaches maturity. Although active growth is limited during this phase, the pathogen produces fungal effectors to modify the host environment and maintain its survival, which is similar to an endophytic lifestyle. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. acutatum, C. higginsianum, C. graminicola, and C. coccodes actively release ammonium to increase the environmental pH, alter plant gene expression, modulate host responses, and induce confined cell death, after which the pathogen transitions to the necrotrophic phase [37,38]. The transcription factor PacC regulates genes encoding transporters, antioxidants, and cell-wall degrading enzymes and is crucial for successful colonisation. Alkan et al. (2013) reported that PacC of C. gloeosporioides activates degradative enzymes under alkaline conditions [39]. O'Connell et al. (2012) found that C. higginsianum and C. graminicola contain more genes encoding key enzymes involved in secondary metabolism than Pyricularia (Magnaporthe) oryzae and Fusarium graminearum. Some of these genes are essential for maintaining primary and secondary metabolism and encode mycotoxins that are important for pathogenicity [40].
The nature of infection by Colletotrichum species through the formation of appressoria and penetration of the cuticle and epidermal cells is important in the design of bioassays to determine pathogenicity. As discussed later a bioassay to assess the ability of Colletotrichum isolates to cause infection must not be based solely on wounding the cuticle and epidermis before placing the inoculum over the wound site.

3. Citrus Diseases Associated with Colletotrichum Species

Globally, citrus diseases caused by Colletotrichum species have been reported from every continent. Anthracnose, twig and shoot dieback or withertip, post-bloom fruit drop (PFD), and Key lime anthracnose are important citrus diseases associated with Colletotrichum species [41,42,43,44,45].

3.1. Anthracnose

Anthracnose is the most typical citrus disease associated with Colletotrichum species and affects citrus both pre- and post-harvest. To date, anthracnose has been reported globally from Citrus × aurantium, Citrus × latifolia, Citrus × sinensis, Citrus aurantiifolia, Citrus aurantium, Citrus australasica, Citrus bergamia, Citrus digitata, Citrus flamea, Citrus floridana, Citrus grandis, Citrus hystrix, Citrus japonica, Citrus latifolia, Citrus limon, Citrus maxima, Citrus medica, Citrus nobilis, Citrus paradisi, Citrus reticulata, Citrus nobilis × Citrus deliciosa, and the mandarin-like hybrid ‘Mandared’ (Table 1).
As a pre-harvest disease of citrus, anthracnose infects leaves, stems, flower petals, and unharvested fruit, with notable symptoms including sunken necrotic lesions and concentric rings of conidial masses [46,47]. Symptoms on leaves include necrotic lesions, greasy spots, mesophyll collapse, or blight, leading to wilting, yellowing, and leaf drop [42,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Necrotic spots, canker, or splitting are common symptoms on stems, branches, and petioles [45,49]. Fruits infected by anthracnose often develop sunken, brown or black tear stains, spots, or lesions on the rind. Yellowing of immature fruit, rind russeting and microcracking, and fruit dryness have also been reported as anthracnose symptoms on citrus fruit [42,48,49,52,53,54,55,56,57]. Stem end rot, in which the disease progresses downwards from infected twigs to the stem end of the fruit, is a severe pre-harvest citrus anthracnose disease. It causes circular, brown, soft to semi-pliable lesions at the stem end of the fruit, leading to fruit rot, fruit drop, and fruit mummification. Infection has also been detected at both the stem and stylar ends of the fruit [44,45].
Post-harvest anthracnose refers to anthracnose that develops during post-harvest storage, transport, or marketing. Colletotrichum species remain quiescent after entering immature citrus fruit and cause anthracnose when the fruit starts to ripen, especially during the post-harvest period [2,12]. The fruit becomes more suitable for disease development during physiological maturation and post-harvest storage due to a favourable environmental pH range of 5.8 to 6.5, softening of the rind, and increased soluble carbohydrate content. Sunken, black spots and tear stains are common early-stage symptoms, and the lesions continue to expand and eventually become firm and dry as the fruit becomes overmature or is exposed to stress. Severely infected fruit becomes soft, and orange conidial masses appear at the centre of the lesions [36].
The economic impact caused by anthracnose is profound. Citrus fruit losses can be as high as 90-100% when environmental conditions are suitable for infection [58]. Severe pre-harvest anthracnose symptoms on orange fruit were observed from 2010 to 2013 in Italy [59]. Cheng et al. (2013) reported that leaf drop and fruit spots caused an average yield loss of 15% in C. reticulata cv. Shiyue Ju in China in 2008 [60]. Fruit drop caused by stem end rot led to significant economic losses in Kinnow mandarin production by negatively affecting fruit yield and quality [44]. For post-harvest anthracnose, an estimated infection incidence of 15% was observed in grapefruit in Mexico during June 2019 [61]; approximately 10% of orange fruit were infected in China in July 2017 and 2018 [62]; and about 15% of Key lime fruit were infected in China in 2016 [63].

3.2. Twig and Shoot Dieback or Withertip

Twig and shoot dieback, which is also known as citrus withertip, has attracted increasing attention in recent years [51,64]. Twig dieback has been frequently reported from multiple commercial citrus species and varieties, including Citrus × aurantium, Citrus × latifolia, Citrus margarita (syn. Fortunella margarita), Citrus × sinensis, Citrus × tangelo, Citrus trifoliata (syn. Poncirus trifoliata), Citrus aurantiifolia, Citrus limon, Citrus maxima, Citrus medica, Citrus paradisi, Citrus reticulata and the mandarin-like hybrid ‘Mandared’ (Table 1).
Typical symptoms of twig dieback include gumming on twigs, twig blight, twig and branch dieback, crown thinning, leaf chlorosis, leaf necrosis, and defoliation [42,46,51,64,65]. The disease starts from the tips of the twigs, spreads towards the main stem, and eventually infects the whole plant, negatively affecting normal plant growth, structure, and function, and potentially leading to plant death [46,66,67]. An outbreak of severe twig dieback resulted in a 40% yield loss in Citrus reticulata cv. Kinnow in Pakistan in 2014 [65]. Moreover, twig dieback caused by Colletotrichum spp. is likely to be a source of inoculum that spreads to flower petals and then to young fruit, leading to post-harvest anthracnose [46,53]. The pathogen can survive in leaves and twigs for a long period before flowers are present [68]. Camiletti et al. (2022) reported latent infection of Colletotrichum dieback on citrus leaves and twigs in California [64].

3.3. Post-Bloom Fruit Drop

Post-bloom fruit drop (PFD), or blossom blight, is another important citrus disease caused by Colletotrichum species. It was initially reported in Belize and is now widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas [69,70,71,72,73,74,75]. Colletotrichum species cause PFD in all commercial citrus varieties, while sweet orange is the most common host species [69,73,75,76].
Post-bloom fruit drop develops quickly under highly humid conditions during the bloom period, and disease symptoms appear within 48 to 72 hours after initial infection [75]. Peach-to-brown, water soaked, elongated lesions first appear on the petals and filaments of diseased flowers. The lesions continuously expand, causing blight of the whole flower and eventually infecting the entire flower cluster. As the disease develops, the pathogen enters the fruit, resulting in yellowing and abscission of the developing fruit [74,75]. Persistent calyces remaining attached to the peduncle are an important and specific symptom for diagnosing PFD [42,75,76]. The observation of petal lesions alone on citrus plants is considered pre-harvest anthracnose [48,52].
Severe outbreaks of PFD cause extensive losses of immature citrus fruit. Fruit losses of sweet orange, grapefruit, lemon and Tahiti lime ranged from 25–35% in Bermuda [75]. In Brazil, PFD may cause severe yield losses of up to 93% when the bloom period coincides with rainy conditions [76].

3.4. Key Lime Anthracnose

Key lime anthracnose is a specific disease complex affecting only the leaves, twigs, flowers and fruit of Key lime [42,70,77]. Common symptoms include necrotic lesions on leaves, twigs, flowers, and fruit, ranging from small lesions to necrotic blight of entire shoots and inflorescences [71,78]. The disease has been observed in citrus orchards in Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, Mexico, Panama, the Dominican Republic, and the USA, and has been suggested to be limited to the Americas [48,71,78].

4. Global Diversity and Distribution of Citrus-Associated Colletotrichum Species

Thirty-nine Colletotrichum species have been isolated from a range of Citrus species globally. Most Colletotrichum species have been reported as plant pathogens, while several species have been found to exhibit endophytic or latent lifestyles, or have been observed as saprobes (Table 1). In Colletotrichum, a monophyletic clade formed by a group of species exhibiting similar morphological characteristics is defined as a species complex, or aggregate [5,79].

4.1. Gloeosporioides Complex

The gloeosporioides complex is the most commonly reported species complex associated with citrus. Sixteen species belonging to the gloeosporioides complex have been reported as pathogens, endophytes, or saprobes on citrus (Table 1).
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is the most common Colletotrichum species associated with citrus globally [42,43,46]. The species was originally isolated from orange (Citrus × sinensis) in southern Italy and has been found to be the most prevalent pathogen causing pre- and post-harvest anthracnose of multiple Citrus species and varieties in Australia, China, and Europe [5,42,49,54]. Previously, C. gloeosporioides was reported to cause leaf anthracnose in Australia, China, Greece, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Spain, Thailand, Tunisia, and Turkey [42,45,48,49,50,51,52,53,57,59,80,81,82]; flower anthracnose in Portugal, Spain, and Tunisia [42,48,52]; branch anthracnose in Portugal [48]; stem spot in Australia [49]; and pre- and post-harvest fruit anthracnose in Australia, Brazil, China, Ghana, Greece, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, Morocco, Portugal, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe [42,45,48,49,52,53,54,55,56,57,59,61,63,80,81,82,83]. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides has also been reported as the most prevalent species causing citrus twig dieback in Australia and Italy and has been associated with citrus twig dieback or withertip in Algeria, China, Greece, Malta, Morocco, Pakistan, Portugal, Spain, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, and the USA [42,45,46,51,52,53,54,56,58,67,80,81,84,85,86]. In Brazil, Bermuda, and Mexico, C. gloeosporioides was found to cause post-bloom fruit drop of Citrus limon and Citrus × sinensis [57,69,73,75,76]. Moreover, C. gloeosporioides has also been found to exhibit an endophytic lifestyle in asymptomatic branches and leaves in China and latent infection in asymptomatic tissues in the USA [43,64,87]. Saprobic C. gloeosporioides has been found on dead fallen leaves in Australia, Malta and China [42,43,49].
Colletotrichum siamense is the second most important species in the gloeosporioides complex. The species has been reported to cause citrus fruit anthracnose in Australia, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, India, Thailand, and Vietnam [44,45,49,54,60,80,88]; leaf anthracnose in China and Thailand [45,60,80,85]; branch canker in Thailand [45]; and twig dieback or withertip in Pakistan and Thailand [45,65,67,80]. Colletotrichum siamense has also been reported as an endophyte isolated from asymptomatic leaves in China [87,89].
Colletotrichum fructicola is the third most common species in the gloeosporioides complex. Globally, C. fructicola has been found to infect citrus leaves in China and Thailand [45,50,80], branches in Australia [49], twigs in Tunisia [53], and fruit in Australia and China [49,62]. Endophytic C. fructicola has also been isolated from asymptomatic leaves in China [43,87].
In addition, C. australianum was associated with fruit anthracnose in Australia [49]. Colletotrichum endophyticum was found to cause leaf spot in Thailand, as well as fruit and leaf anthracnose in Indonesia [45,82]. Colletotrichum helleniense was found to infect twigs and fruit in Greece [42]. Colletotrichum hystricis and C. kahawae subsp. ciggaro (C. cigarro) were reported to cause leaf disease in Italy [42,90]. Colletotrichum queenslandicum was associated with fruit anthracnose in Indonesia and leaf anthracnose in Indonesia and the USA [82,91]. Colletotrichum syzygicola was reported to cause fruit anthracnose in Thailand [92]. Colletotrichum theobromicola was associated with fruit anthracnose in Australia [49]. Colletotrichum aenigma was isolated from Citrus × sinensis in Italy [93]. An unidentified Colletotrichum species was found to infect citrus leaves and fruit in Australia [49]. Colletotrichum tainanense and C. tomentosae were found as endophytes in asymptomatic leaves in China, while C. asianum was found as an endophyte in asymptomatic twigs in China [89].

4.2. Boninense Complex

The boninense complex is the second most commonly reported species complex associated with citrus globally. Seven species belonging to the boninense complex have been reported as pathogens, endophytes, or saprobes on citrus (Table 1).
Colletotrichum karstii is the most important species in the boninense complex and the second most prevalent Colletotrichum pathogen associated with citrus globally. Colletotrichum karstii has frequently been found to cause pre- and post-harvest anthracnose on multiple Citrus species and varieties across a wide geographical distribution, including leaf anthracnose in Australia, China, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey [42,43,48,49,50,59,81]; branch anthracnose in Portugal [48]; and pre- and post-harvest fruit anthracnose in Italy, Portugal, South Africa, Tunisia, and Turkey [42,48,52,54,59,81,94]. Colletotrichum karstii has also been associated with citrus twig dieback or withertip in Australia, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and the USA [42,51,81,85,86,94]. Moreover, C. karstii has been reported to exhibit an endophytic lifestyle in asymptomatic branches, leaves and shoots in China, as well as latent infection in asymptomatic tissues in the USA [43,64,87].
Colletotrichum novae zelandiae is the second most important species in the boninense complex. The species has been reported to cause citrus twig dieback or withertip in Australia and Malta [42,86], leaf lesions in Greece and Malta [42], and fruit infection in New Zealand [95].
Colletotrichum catinaense is the third most common species in the boninense complex and has been found to cause twig withertip and leaf lesions in Italy, as well as fruit tear stain in Portugal [42].
In addition, C. boninense has been reported to cause leaf anthracnose in China [50], C. constrictum has been associated with fruit rot in New Zealand [95], and C. limonicola has been found to cause leaf lesions in Malta [42]. Colletotrichum citricola has been reported to exhibit an endophytic lifestyle in asymptomatic leaves and have been reported as saprobes on leaves in China [43,87].

4.3. Acutatum Complex

The acutatum complex is the third most commonly reported species complex associated with citrus. Seven species belonging to the acutatum complex have been reported as pathogens on citrus (Table 1).
Colletotrichum abscissum has been reported as the causal agent of post-bloom fruit drop in Brazil and the USA [69,72,73,74,75,76]. This species was previously identified as C. acutatum and was therefore recorded as being associated with post-bloom fruit drop under that name [75,76]. It was later reclassified as C. abscissum [72].
Colletotrichum limetticola has been found to cause Key lime anthracnose in the USA [70]. This species was initially identified as C. acutatum and was therefore recorded as being associated with Key lime anthracnose under that name [75,78]. It was later reclassified as C. limetticola [70].
In addition, C. johnstonii has been associated with citrus fruit rot in Australia and New Zealand [70,96], C. acutatum has been reported to cause leaf lesions in Italy [42], C. godetiae has been found to infect the fruit of Citrus aurantium [70], C. citri has been reported to cause shoot anthracnose in China [43], and C. simmondsii has been associated with fruit anthracnose in China [9].

4.4. Magnum Complex

Three species belonging to the magnum complex have been reported as pathogens or endophytes on citrus (Table 1). Colletotrichum brevisporum has been found to cause leaf anthracnose and to exhibit an endophytic lifestyle in China [5,50]. Colletotrichum guangdongense has been found as an endophyte in asymptomatic twigs in China [89]. Colletotrichum kokhaense has been associated with leaf lesions in Thailand [80]

4.5. Gigasporum Complex

Two species belonging to the gigasporum complex have been reported as pathogens or endophytes on citrus (Table 1). Colletotrichum gigasporum has been reported to cause twig dieback and leaf lesions in Thailand [80]. The species has also been found as an endophyte in asymptomatic leaves in China [87]. Colletotrichum citri-maximae has been found to exhibit an endophytic lifestyle in asymptomatic fruit in China [54].

4.6. Dracaenophilum, Orchidearum and Truncatum Complexes

Colletotrichum tropicicola, belonging to the dracaenophilum complex, has been reported to cause leaf lesions and twig dieback in Thailand [80,97]. Endophytic C. tropicicola has also been isolated from asymptomatic leaves in China [87]. Colletotrichum tropicicola has also been isolated from Citrus sp. in Mexico [98].
Colletotrichum plurivorum, belonging to the orchidearum complex, has been reported to infect citrus leaves in Thailand [45,80]. The species has also been found as an endophyte in asymptomatic leaves in China [87,89]. Colletotrichum truncatum, belonging to the truncatum complex, has been found to cause shoot and leaf anthracnose and to exhibit an endophytic lifestyle in asymptomatic leaves in China [43,87].

4.7. Singleton Species

The singleton species C. citrus-medicae has been reported to cause leaf spot of Citrus medica in China [99].
These identified citrus-associated Colletotrichum species have important implications for plant biosecurity risk management and the development of integrated control strategies. However, some of these Colletotrichum species may have been misidentified by analysing only morphological characters [56], only ITS sequences [52,53,59,84], or species-specific primers designed before the adoption of multi-locus phylogeny [75,76]. Phylogenetic analyses based on the combination of ITS and gapdh sequences [55] or ITS and tub2 sequences [93] are also unable to clearly distinguish a Colletotrichum species from closely related species [5]. Further identification of Colletotrichum species should utilise the polyphasic approach, which consists of multi-gene phylogenetic analysis, traditional morphological character descriptions, and other information such as geographical and ecological data.

5. Pathogenicity and Host- or Tissue-Specificity of Citrus-Associated Colletotrichum Species

Pathogenicity, which indicates the ability of a pathogen to cause disease on a host, consists of variations in aggressiveness and pathotype differences. Different Colletotrichum species may contain isolates with various levels of aggressiveness and different pathotypes on the same host species [42,45]. Different pathotypes within the same Colletotrichum species can be identified on the same host species according to qualitative differences in disease expression [100,101].
Controlled environment bioassays using detached or in planta leaves, twigs, flower petals, and fruit are widely used to test the pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species. Many pathogenicity tests have been performed on Citrus by inoculating Colletotrichum isolates onto the same tissues of the same host species to reproduce similar disease symptoms and then re-isolating the pathogens from the inoculated tissues [88,96]. Studies have reported that Colletotrichum isolates obtained from one host or tissue may also cause symptoms on other hosts or tissues, suggesting that these species are not strictly host- or tissue-specific. However, these findings are often dependent on the type of bioassay. Cross-host inoculation bioassays have been conducted to test the pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with citrus disease on multiple hosts and tissues, and several species have demonstrated the ability to infect citrus hosts or tissues beyond the original host tissue using wound or non-wound inoculation (Table 2).
Similarly, Colletotrichum species have been shown to infect and cause disease across plant genera. Colletotrichum acutatum isolated from diseased fruit of Olea europaea and C. karstii isolated from diseased leaves of Camellia sp. caused disease symptoms on wounded in planta twigs of sweet orange ‘Tarocco Scirè’, lemon ‘Femminello 2Kr’, and bergamot ‘Fantastico’; wounded detached leaves of sweet orange ‘Moro’ and ‘Navelina’; and wounded fruit of apple (Malus domestica) ‘Fuji’ and ‘Cripps Pink’. The C. acutatum and C. karstii isolates caused significantly larger lesion areas on wounded leaves of sweet orange ‘Navelina’ than those caused by Colletotrichum isolates associated with citrus disease [51]. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolated from diseased mandarin and sweet orange twigs, diseased sweet orange leaves, and diseased lemon fruit, as well as C. karstii isolated from diseased sweet orange twigs, infected wounded fruit of apple ‘Fuji’ and ‘Cripps Pink’ [51]. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides associated with lemon twig withertip caused lesions on wounded fruit of apple ‘Gala’, avocado ‘Fuerte’, pear ‘Santa Maria’, pepper ‘Capia’, and banana ‘Cavendish’ [81]. Colletotrichum karstii causing kumquat twig and branch dieback infected wounded fruit of apple ‘Golden Delicious’ [102]. These results may however overstate the seriousness of cross-host pathogenicity because the bioassays involved wounding the cuticle and epidermis of the plant tissue with a sterile needle or scalpel before placing the inoculum over the wound.
The cuticle and epidermis are important physical barriers that defend the host against pathogen infection. Artificial damage to these physical barriers bypasses the need for Colletotrichum species to penetrate the cuticle and epidermis and may therefore provide a biased measure of pathogenicity [27,28,100,103]. In contrast, during non-wound inoculation, the inoculum is placed directly on the surface of the host tissue, requiring the Colletotrichum species to penetrate the physical barriers to initiate infection. This method is closer to infection occurring in the natural environment [2,101,103]. Hence, the non-wound inoculation method tends to provide a more realistic evaluation of the pathogenicity of weakly aggressive species or species with latent or endophytic lifestyles [100,101]. Colletotrichum gigasporum, C. kokhaense, C. gloeosporioides, C. plurivorum, and C. siamense showed various degrees of aggressiveness on non-wounded lime and orange fruit but showed similarly high levels of aggressiveness when the citrus fruit was wounded before inoculation [80]. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. karstii, and C. novae-zelandiae, which developed a latent lifestyle after infecting non-wounded orange and lemon twigs, became pathogenic when the citrus twigs were inoculated using the wound inoculation method [86].

6. Biosecurity Implications of Citrus-Associated Colletotrichum Species

Thirty-nine Colletotrichum species have been found to be associated with Citrus species, with additional novel species continuing to be described [1,5]. Most Colletotrichum species have been collected from a range of Citrus species and host tissues, except for species represented by only one isolate. Host- or tissue-specific pathogens typically have a more restricted distribution, whereas those with a broad host range are more likely to cause disease worldwide. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, which is the most important Colletotrichum species associated with citrus globally, has also been reported from the greatest diversity of Citrus species and can infect all citrus tissues [42,43,46,73]. Isolates of many citrus-associated Colletotrichum species, such as C. fructicola, C. gigasporum, C. gloeosporioides, C. karstii, C. plurivorum, C. siamense, C. theobromicola, and C. tropicicola, have been reported from hosts belonging to different genera [1,104,105,106,107]. Cross-plant genus infection by Colletotrichum species has also been demonstrated on wounded fruits [9]. Both in planta and detached tissue bioassays demonstrated that C. acutatum and C. karstii isolates obtained from hosts belonging to different genera were able to infect citrus using wound inoculation [51]. The isolation of the same Colletotrichum species from different hosts, together with the first reports of Colletotrichum species on citrus in different geographical locations, demonstrates the potential for cross infection and poses a threat to the biosecurity of the citrus industry.
In addition, all species in the genus Citrus are hybrids or introgressions between mandarin (Citrus reticulata), pomelo (Citrus maxima) and citron (Citrus medica) [14,15]. The genetic similarity among commercially cultivated Citrus species may be conducive to the transmission of Colletotrichum species between different citrus hosts. Meanwhile, the demonstrated cross-host infection by C. gloeosporioides isolated from citrus on wounded fruit of apple, avocado, pear, pepper, and banana, and by C. karstii isolated from citrus on wounded apple fruit, makes these two species potential high-risk pathogens for different fruit and vegetable industries, especially where susceptible plants are grown near citrus [51,81,102].
An exotic pathogen may rapidly colonise a new environment and pose a biosecurity risk to local plants when environmental conditions are suitable for the species [108]. The temperature tolerance of Colletotrichum species is an important factor when considering their distribution and the damage they may cause to the local ecosystem. Although the optimum temperature for mycelial growth, conidial germination, and appressoria formation and melanisation of C. gloeosporioides was estimated to be around 24°C, its growth rate remained relatively high at 30°C and was only moderately reduced at 35°C compared with its growth at 25°C [51,64,76]. The broad temperature tolerance of C. gloeosporioides is consistent with its reported occurrence across a wide range of climates, including tropical, subtropical, Mediterranean, temperate, and semi-arid regions (Table 1).
Colletotrichum siamense was originally described from Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) in Thailand and has been reported to grow optimally at 30°C. Consistent with this relatively high optimal growth temperature, previous reports of C. siamense from diseased citrus tissues have mainly occurred in tropical climate zones, and C. siamense has been identified as the most prevalent Colletotrichum species associated with citrus in Thailand [1,80,109]. Furthermore, C. acutatum and C. karstii have optimum growth temperatures of around 24°C, and their growth rates were dramatically reduced at 30 and 35°C, suggesting that these pathogens may be more likely to cause disease on plants in temperate regions [51,64,76]. In contrast, C. endophyticum, C. fructicola, C. gigasporum, C. plurivorum, and C. tropicicola may cause severe damage to agricultural industries in tropical climate zones [43,45,49,50,80,82,89,97]. Therefore, Colletotrichum species may need to be listed as quarantine pathogens by national biosecurity regulatory authorities in countries or states where they have not previously been detected, to reduce potential biosecurity risks to local plants, especially in areas with environmental conditions suitable for these species.
Colletotrichum species have multiple lifestyles and can transition to different lifestyle stages during the disease cycle to complete infection [2,11]. Several Colletotrichum species associated with citrus diseases, including C. fructicola, C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, C. karstii, C. brevisporum, C. gigasporum, C. tropicicola, C. plurivorum, and C. truncatum, have been reported as either causing citrus disease or exhibiting endophytic or quiescent lifestyles (Table 1). Although several Colletotrichum species have only been observed as endophytes in citrus, their pathogenic potential cannot be excluded. Colletotrichum gigasporum and C. plurivorum were first identified as endophytes and were later reported to cause citrus disease [45,80,87,89]. Camiletti et al. (2022) demonstrated that C. gloeosporioides and C. karstii isolated from asymptomatic leaves and twigs were able to cause twig dieback [65] . Therefore, the potential dispersal of Colletotrichum species in asymptomatic citrus tissues is of major importance when considering biosecurity. Endophytic or quiescent Colletotrichum species may remain undetected and be overlooked during quarantine inspection when citrus fruit or plant material is imported. In addition, C. citricola and C. gloeosporioides have been observed as saprobes on dead fallen leaves, which may serve as potential sources of inoculum for citrus and other hosts and pose biosecurity risks both locally and during transportation to other regions [42,43,49].
Rapid and accurate identification of Colletotrichum species is particularly important in quarantine inspection [10]. Real-time quantitative PCR, which enables the rapid, sensitive, and accurate quantification of target fungal DNA in a wide range of environmental samples, has been developed for several Colletotrichum species. De Silva (2019) developed a qPCR assay to differentiate C. scovillei from 14 closely related Colletotrichum species, especially C. acutatum and C. nymphaeae that cause anthracnose in chili [110]. Debode et al. (2009) quantitatively detected C. acutatum in naturally infected and symptomless strawberry leaves using real-time PCR [111]. A real-time PCR assay has also been developed for the rapid and accurate identification of C. coccodes in symptomatic tomato leaves and external asymptomatic potato tubers [112]. Azevedo-Nogueira et al. (2021) designed a species-specific qPCR assay to enable the rapid detection and quantification of C. acutatum sensu stricto in pulverised asymptomatic olive fruit at 16 hours post inoculation [113]. Additionally, knowledge of the resistance levels of multiple host varieties to the same pathogen species is essential for breeding resistant varieties for integrated disease management and minimizing both economic losses and environmental impacts [24]. Real-time quantitative PCR could also be used to screen resistant host varieties [114,115]. Therefore, real-time quantitative PCR assays could be developed for highly aggressive citrus-associated Colletotrichum species and applied in screening procedures for imported produce and in breeding programs to strengthen plant biosecurity. The problem with developing a PCR diagnostic technique is selecting species-specific primers due to the ever-increasing number of new species especially closely related pathogenic species.
Globally, records of new Colletotrichum species associated with citrus continue to increase, placing greater pressure on plant biosecurity risk management. Accurate identification of species is the initial step, as many species have been isolated solely from one host species in one geographic location. Further studies are urgently needed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the host ranges and suitable environmental conditions of Colletotrichum species. Colletotrichum species have shown various levels of aggressiveness and pathotype differences when infecting the same host plant tissue under the same environmental conditions [42,43,45,48,52,53,80,81,86,101]. The pathogenicity of each Colletotrichum species indicates its potential to reduce productivity in citrus orchards. Detached organ assays are useful for rapid screening, require less space than in planta assays conducted in greenhouses or fields, and can produce disease symptoms similar to those observed following in planta inoculations [48,116]. Therefore, comprehensive pathogenicity bioassays that include common hosts of Colletotrichum species and a range of temperature and humidity conditions can be used to determine host range, estimate the potential distribution of newly reported species, and assess their potential to pose biosecurity risks to citrus trees, native plants, and crops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: W.W., N.V., P.K.A., J.E., P.W.C. and P.W.J.T.; data curation: W.W.; project administration: P.W.J.T.; supervision: W.W., N.V., P.K.A., J.E., P.W.C. and P.W.J.T.; writing—original draft: W.W.; writing—review and editing: W.W., N.V., J.E., P.W.C. and P.W.J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The first author gratefully acknowledges the Melbourne Research Scholarship awarded by the University of Melbourne.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Talhinhas, P.; Baroncelli, R. Hosts of Colletotrichum. Mycosphere 2023, 14, 158–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Silva, D.D.; Crous, P.W.; Ades, P.K.; Hyde, K.D.; Taylor, P.W.J. Life styles of Colletotrichum species and implications for plant biosecurity. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jayawardena, R.S.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Hyde, K.D.; Gentekaki, E.; Itthayakorn, P. Colletotrichum: Lifestyles, biology, morpho-species, species complexes and accepted species. Mycosphere 2021, 12, 519–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, S.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Tian, C. New species of Colletotrichum from forest trees in China: Colletotrichum archidendri, Colletotrichum brunnis, and Colletotrichum litseae. Mycologia 2026, 118, 524–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, F.; Ma, Z.Y.; Hou, L.W.; Diao, Y.Z.; Wu, W.P.; Damm, U.; Song, S.; Cai, L. Updating species diversity of Colletotrichum, with a phylogenomic overview. Stud. Mycol. 2022, 101, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, S.; Lee, H.-K.; Kim, D.-R.; Han, Y.-K. Identification, distribution, and fungicide sensitivity of Colletotrichum spp. causing peach anthracnose in South Korea. Plant Dis. 2026, 110, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yin, X.; Yuan, L.; Wang, C.; Ji, T.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Han, X.; Wei, Y. Identification, characterization, and population structure of Colletotrichum spp. causing grape ripe rot in China. Plant Dis. 2026, 110, 944–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dean, R.; Van Kan, J.A.L.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Di Pietro, A.; Spanu, P.D.; Rudd, J.J.; Dickman, M.; Kahmann, R.; Ellis, J.; et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Phoulivong, S.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Hyde, K.D. Cross infection of Colletotrichum species; a case study with tropical fruits. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 2012, 2, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J. Global food and fibre security threatened by current inefficiencies in fungal identification. Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hyde, K.D.; Prihastuti, H.; Cai, L.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Yang, Y.L.; Zhang, J.Z. Colletotrichum: A catalogue of confusion. Fungal Divers. 2009, 39, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pitt, J.I. Fungi and food spoilage, 4th ed.; Springer, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  13. Inglese, P.; Sortino, G. Citrus history, taxonomy, breeding, and fruit quality; Oxford University Press, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Velasco, R.; Licciardello, C. A genealogy of the citrus family: Clarification of the genetic relationships among species opens new possibilities for enhancing citrus diversity and disease resistance. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 640–642. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu, G.A.; Terol, J.; Ibanez, V.; López-García, A.; Pérez-Román, E.; Borredá, C.; Domingo, C.; Tadeo, F.R.; Carbonell-Caballero, J.; Alonso, R.; et al. Genomics of the origin and evolution of citrus. Nature 2018, 554, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. USDA. Citrus: World markets and trade. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/citrus.pdf (07/02/2025).
  17. Albrigo, L.G.; Stelinski, L.L.; Timmer, L.W. Citrus, 2nd ed.; CABI Publishing, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chakraborty, S.; Datta, S. How will plant pathogens adapt to host plant resistance at elevated CO2 under a changing climate? New Phytol. 2003, 159, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Howard, R.J.; Ferrari, M.A.; Roach, D.H.; Money, N.P. Penetration of hard substrates by a fungus employing enormous turgor pressures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 11281–11284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kleemann, J.; Rincon-Rivera, L.J.; Takahara, H.; Neumann, U.; van Themaat, E.V.L.; van der Does, H.C.; Hacquard, S.; Stüber, K.; Will, I.; Schmalenbach, W.; et al. Sequential delivery of host-induced virulence effectors by appressoria and intracellular hyphae of the phytopathogen Colletotrichum higginsianum. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nesher, I.; Barhoom, S.; Sharon, A. Cell cycle and cell death are not necessary for appressorium formation and plant infection in the fungal plant pathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. BMC Biol. 2008, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sharma, M.; Kulshrestha, S. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides: An anthracnose causing pathogen of fruits and vegetables. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2015, 12, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sreenivasaprasad, S.; Talhinhas, P. Genotypic and phenotypic diversity in Colletotrichum acutatum, a cosmopolitan pathogen causing anthracnose on a wide range of hosts. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005, 6, 361–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wharton, P.S.; Diéguez-Uribeondo, J. The biology of Colletotrichum acutatum. An. Del Jardín Botánico De Madr. 2004, 61, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Münch, S.; Lingner, U.; Floss, D.S.; Ludwig, N.; Sauer, N.; Deising, H.B. The hemibiotrophic lifestyle of Colletotrichum species. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alkan, N.; Friedlander, G.; Ment, D.; Prusky, D.; Fluhr, R. Simultaneous transcriptome analysis of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and tomato fruit pathosystem reveals novel fungal pathogenicity and fruit defense strategies. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 801–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guest, D.; Brown, J. Plant defences against pathogens. In Plant pathogens and plant diseases, 1997; pp 263-286.
  28. Hammond-Kosack, K.E. Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1773–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Law, C.X.; Hashim, N.; Ismail, S.I.; Jahari, M.; Al Riza, D.F. A review on anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum spp. in fruits and advances in control strategies. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2025, 442, 111397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Auyong, A.; Ford, R.; Taylor, P. The role of cutinase and its impact on pathogenicity of Colletotrichum truncatum. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 259–269. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bhagya, N.; Sheik, S.; Sharma, M.S.; Chandrashekar, K.J.J.o.P. Isolation of endophytic Colletotrichum gloeosporioides penz. from Salacia chinensis and its antifungal sensitivity. J. Phytol. 2011, 3. [Google Scholar]
  32. Caffall, K.H.; Mohnen, D. The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1879–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jing, Z.; Ting, L.; Mengting, L.; Xiaoyan, D.; Jiechun, P.; Zhiwei, L.; Guoxiang, J.; Yueming, J.; Xuewu, D. Epigenetic activation of lignin biosynthesis by csjmj16 confers enhanced resistance to Penicillium digitatum in citrus. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2026, 236, 114247–114247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gan, P.; Ikeda, K.; Irieda, H.; Narusaka, M.; O'Connell, R.J.; Narusaka, Y.; Takano, Y.; Kubo, Y.; Shirasu, K. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the hemibiotrophic stage shift of Colletotrichum fungi. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 1236–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alkan, N.; Fortes, A.M. Insights into molecular and metabolic events associated with fruit response to post-harvest fungal pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cooke, T. Diseases of fruit crops in australia; CSIRO Publishing, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  37. Prusky, D.; Alkan, N.; Mengiste, T.; Fluhr, R. Quiescent and necrotrophic lifestyle choice during postharvest disease development. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kramer-Haimovich, H.; Servi, E.; Katan, T.; Rollins, J.; Okon, Y.; Prusky, D. Effect of ammonia production by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on pelb activation, pectate lyase secretion, and fruit pathogenicity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alkan, N.; Xiangchun, M.; Friedlander, G.; Reuveni, E.; Sukno, S.; Sherman, A.; Thon, M.; Fluhr, R.; Prusky, D. Global aspects of pacc regulation of pathogenicity genes in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides as revealed by transcriptome analysis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 1345–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. O'Connell, R.J.; Thon, M.R.; Hacquard, S.; Amyotte, S.G.; Kleemann, J.; Torres, M.F.; Damm, U.; Buiate, E.A.; Epstein, L.; Alkan, N.; et al. Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bahri, B.A.; Saadani, M.; Mechichi, G.; Rouissi, W. Genetic diversity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex associated with citrus wither-tip of twigs in Tunisia using microsatellite markers. J. Phytopathol. 2019, 167, 351–362. [Google Scholar]
  42. Guarnaccia, V.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W.; Polizzi, G. High species diversity in Colletotrichum associated with citrus diseases in Europe. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2017, 39, 32–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huang, F.; Chen, G.Q.; Hou, X.; Fu, Y.S.; Cai, L.; Hyde, K.D.; Li, H.Y. Colletotrichum species associated with cultivated citrus in China. Fungal Divers. 2013, 61, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kaur, D.; Kaur, A.; Harpreet, S.; Arora, A. First report of Colletotrichum siamense causing fruit drop in kinnow mandarin (Citrus nobilis x Citrus deliciosa) in Punjab, India. Crop Prot. 2024, 175, 106464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Najafiniya, M.; de Farias, A.R.G.; Armand, A.; Jungkhun, N.; Jayawardena, R. Characterization of Colletotrichum species obtained from citrus in northern Thailand and introducing a new host record for C. plurivorum. Plant Pathol. 2024, 73, 1349–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rhaiem, A.; Taylor, P.W.J. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides associated with anthracnose symptoms on citrus, a new report for Tunisia. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 146, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Timmer, L.W.; Garnsey, S.M.; Graham, J.H. Compendium of citrus diseases, 2nd ed.; APS Press, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ramos, A.P.; Talhinhas, P.; Sreenivasaprasad, S.; Oliveira, H. Characterization of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, as the main causal agent of citrus anthracnose, and C. karstii as species preferentially associated with lemon twig dieback in Portugal. Phytoparasitica 2016, 44, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, W.; de Silva, D.D.; Moslemi, A.; Edwards, J.; Ades, P.K.; Crous, P.W.; Taylor, P.W.J. Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose of citrus in Australia. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peng, L.; Yang, Y.; Hyde, K.D.; Bahkali, A.H.; Liu, Z. Colletotrichum species on citrus leaves in Guizhou and Yunnan provinces, China. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2012, 33, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Riolo, M.; Aloi, F.; Pane, A.; Cacciola, S.O.; Cara, M. Twig and shoot dieback of citrus, a new disease caused by Colletotrichum species. Cells 2021, 10, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Daoud, H.B.E.N.H.; Baraldi, E.; Iotti, M.; Leonardi, P.; Boughalleb-M'Hamdi, N. Characterization and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum spp. causing citrus anthracnose in Tunisia. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2019, 58, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Daoud, H.B.H.; Ben Salem, I.; Sánchez, J.; Gallego, E.; Boughalleb-M’Hamdi, N. Occurrence of Colletotrichum fruticola along with C. gloeosporioides in causing anthracnose disease on Citrus sinensis in Tunisia. Indian Phytopathol. 2019, 72, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Douanla-Meli, C.; Unger, J.-G. Phylogenetic study of the Colletotrichum species on imported citrus fruits uncovers a low diversity and a new species in the Colletotrichum gigasporum complex. Fungal Biol. 2017, 121, 858–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Honger, J.O.; Offei, S.K.; Oduro, K.A.; Nyaku, S.T.; Odamtten, G.T. Identification and molecular characterisation of Colletotrichum species from avocado, citrus and pawpaw in Ghana. South Afr. J. Plant Soil 2016, 33, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Benyahia, H.; Jrifi, A.; Afellah, M.; Smaili, C.; Lamsetef, Y.; Timmer, L.W. First report of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing withertip on twigs and tear stain on fruit of citrus in Morocco. Plant Pathol. 2003, 52, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Patricia, L.-C.C.; María del Socorro, R.-G.; Iván, R.-H.; Erika, D.l.C.-A.; Carolina, D.S.; Keiko, S.; José Alberto, N.-Z. Occurrence and infective potential of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates associated to Citrus limon var eureka. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 31, e00651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yin, L.; Du, S.; Cai, M.; Luo, C. Identification of anthracnose of wild citrus. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 30, 590–594. [Google Scholar]
  59. Aiello, D.; Carrieri, R.; Guarnaccia, V.; Vitale, A.; Lahoz, E.; Polizzi, G. Characterization and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. karstii causing preharvest disease on citrus sinensis in Italy. J. Phytopathol. 2015, 163, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cheng, B.P.; Huang, Y.H.; Song, X.B.; Peng, A.T.; Ling, J.F.; Chen, X. First report of Colletotrichum siamense causing leaf drop and fruit spot of Citrus reticulata blanco cv. Shiyue ju in China. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cruz-Lagunas, B.; Ortega-Acosta, S.Á.; Reyes-García, G.; Toribio-Jiménez, J.; Juárez-López, P.; Guillén-Sánchez, D.; Damián-Nava, A.; Romero-Ramírez, Y.; Palemón-Alberto, F. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causes anthracnose on grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) in Mexico. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 2020, 15, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hu, W.L.; Ma, Y.Z.; Chen, J.Z. First report of Citrus sinensis anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum fructicola in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, T.; Xiang, S.; Ren, D.D.; Zhu, P.K.; Xu, L. First report of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing postharvest fruit rot on Citrus aurantifolia in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Camiletti, B.X.; Lichtemberg, P.S.F.; Paredes, J.A.; Carraro, T.A.; Velascos, J.; Michailides, T.J. Characterization of Colletotrichum isolates causing Colletotrichum dieback of citrus in California. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 1454–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fayyaz, A.; Bonello, P.; Tufail, M.R.; Amrao, L.; Habib, A.; Gai, Y.; Sahi, S.T. First report of citrus withertip (tip dieback), a disease complex caused by Colletotrichum siamense and Lasiodiplodia iraniensis, on Citrus reticulata cv. Kinnow in Punjab, Pakistan. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Strange, R.N. Introduction to plant pathology; John Wiley & Sons, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  67. Fayyaz, A.; Sahi, S.T.; Amrao, L.; Nawaz-ul-Rehman, M.S. Molecular characterization of fungal pathogens associated with citrus withertip/dieback from major citrus growing areas of Punjab, Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2020, 23, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zulfiqar, M.; Brlansky, R.H.; Timmer, L.W. Infection of flower and vegetative tissues of citrus by Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides. Mycologia 1996, 88, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ferreira, A.F.T.A.F.; Ribeiro, M.D.; da Silva, J.F.; da S. Bentes, J.L. Citrus postbloom fruit drop in commercial orchards in the Brazilian Amazonas State. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2023, 48, 614–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Damm, U.; Cannon, P.F.; Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Crous, P.W. The Colletotrichum acutatum species complex. Stud. Mycol. 2012, 73, 37–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Aguilera-Cogley, V.; Vicent, A. Etiology and distribution of foliar fungal diseases of citrus in Panama. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2019, 44, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Crous, P.W.; Hernández-Restrepo, M.; Boekhout, T.; Groenewald, M.; Lombard, L.; Th Smith, M.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Wingfield, M.J.; Guarro, J.; Gené, J.; et al. Fungal planet description sheets: 320–370. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2015, 34, 167–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Silva, A.O.; Savi, D.C.; Gomes, F.B.; Gos, F.M.W.R.; Silva, J.G.J.; Glienke, C. Identification of Colletotrichum species associated with postbloom fruit drop in Brazil through gapdh sequencing analysis and multiplex PCR. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 147, 731–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. de Gasparoto, M.C.d.G.; Gama, A.B.; Wang, N.Y.; Rebello, Carolina S.; Dewdney, M.M.; Peres, N.A. Colletotrichum abscissum: Detection on symptomless citrus leaves and symptomatic citrus flowers using high-resolution melting analysis. Plant Pathol. 2023, 72, 708–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. McGovern, R.J.; Seijo, T.E.; Hendricks, K.; Roberts, P.D. New report of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing postbloom fruit drop on citrus in Bermuda. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 34, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lima, W.G.; Spósito, M.B.; Amorim, L.; Gonçalves, F.P.; de Filho, P.A.M. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, a new causal agent of citrus post-bloom fruit drop. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 131, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Brown, A.; Sreenivasaprasad, S.; Timmer, L. Molecular characterization of slow-growing orange and key lime anthracnose strains of Colletotrichum from citrus as C. acutatum. Phytopathology 1996, 86, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Peres, N.A.; MacKenzie, S.J.; Peever, T.L.; Timmer, L.W. Postbloom fruit drop of citrus and key lime anthracnose are caused by distinct phylogenetic lineages of Colletotrichum acutatum. Phytopathology 2008, 98, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cannon, P.F.; Damm, U.; Johnston, P.R.; Weir, B.S. Colletotrichum – current status and future directions. Stud. Mycol. 2012, 73, 181–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, W.; Taylor, P.W.J.; Chomram, S.; Vaghefi, N.; Ades, P.K.; Edwards, J.; Crous, P.W.; Bussaban, B. Colletotrichum causing anthracnose of citrus in Thailand including C. kokhaense sp. nov. and a new host record for C. gigasporum. Plant Dis. 2026, 110, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Uysal, A.; Kurt, Ş.; Guarnaccia, V. Distribution and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with citrus anthracnose in eastern mediterranean region of Turkey. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 163, 125–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Shidiq, M.A.A.; Widyaningsih, S.; Wibowo, A.; Widiastuti, A. First report of Colletotrichum queenslandicum and Colletotrichum endophyticum causing citrus anthracnose in Indonesia. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2024, 23, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Huong, B.T.C.; Linh, H.L.K.; Van, T.T.B.; Tien, D.T.K.; Nga, N.T.T.; Que, P.T.T.; Tuyen, K.C.; Ay, N.V.; Khang, D.T. Identification of pathogens causing anthracnose on king oranges (Citrus nobilis var. Typica hassk). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 25, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mahiout, D.; Bendahmane, B.S.; Benkada, M.Y.; Mekouar, H.; Berrahal, N.; Rickauer, M. First report of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on citrus in Algeria. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2018, 57, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mayorquin, J.S.; Nouri, M.T.; Peacock, B.B.; Trouillas, F.P.; Douhan, G.W.; Kallsen, C.; Eskalen, A. Identification, pathogenicity, and spore trapping of Colletotrichum karstii associated with twig and shoot dieback in California. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 1464–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, W.; Taylor, A.S.; Tongson, E.; Edwards, J.; Vaghefi, N.; Ades, P.K.; Crous, P.W.; Taylor, P.W.J. Identification and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with twig dieback of citrus in Western Australia. Plant Pathol. 2024, 73, 1194–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhou, T.; Luo, M.; Huang, Q.; Tan, Q.; Hyde, K.D.; You, C.; Liu, G.; Fatimah, A.-O.; Xiong, Y.; Manawasinghe, I.S. Colletotrichum (sordariomycetes, glomerellaceae) species associated with citrus in Guangdong Province, China. N. Z. J. Bot. 2025, 63, 278–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kharbadkar, V.P.; Kolase, S.; Latake, S.; Shete, M.; Shinde, V.; Kale, A. First report of Colletotrichum siamense causing fruit rot of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) in India. Plant Dis. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Liu, J.W.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Liao, X.N.; Mao, J.; Dong, Z.Y.; Shu, Y.X.; Luo, M.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Wanasinghe, D.N. Endophytic Colletotrichum (sordariomycetes, glomerellaceae) species associated with Citrus grandis cv. “Tomentosa” in China. MycoKeys 2023, 95, 163–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Perrone, G.; Magistà, D.; Ismail, A.M. First report of Colletotrichum kahawae subsp. ciggaro on mandarin in Italy. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 98, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kunta, M.; Park, J.W.; Vedasharan, P.; da Graça, J.V.; Terry, M.D. First report of Colletotrichum queenslandicum on persian lime causing leaf anthracnose in the United States. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Udayanga, D.; Manamgoda, D.S.; Liu, X.; Chukeatirote, E.; Hyde, K.D. What are the common anthracnose pathogens of tropical fruits? Fungal Divers. 2013, 61, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Schena, L.; Mosca, S.; Cacciola, S.O.; Faedda, R.; Sanzani, S.M.; Agosteo, G.E.; Sergeeva, V.; Magnano di San Lio, G. Species of the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. boninense complexes associated with olive anthracnose. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Uysal, A.; Kurt, Ş. First report of Colletotrichum karstii causing anthracnose on citrus in the mediterranean region of Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 101, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Damm, U.; Cannon, P.F.; Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Johnston, P.R.; Weir, B.S.; Tan, Y.P.; Shivas, R.G.; Crous, P.W. The Colletotrichum boninense species complex. Stud. Mycol. 2012, 73, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, W.; Vaghefi, N.; Tan, Y.P.; Ades, P.K.; Edwards, J.; Crous, P.W.; Taylor, P.W.J. First report of Colletotrichum johnstonii causing fruit rot of Citrus australasica in Australia. Plant Dis. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Noireung, P.; Phoulivong, S.; Liu, F.; Cai, L.; Mckenzie, E.H.; Chukeatirote, E.; Jones, E.; Bahkali, A.H.; Hyde, K.D. Novel species of Colletotrichum revealed by morphology and molecular analysis. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2012, 33, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Damm, U.; Satō, T.; Alizadeh, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. The Colletotrichum dracaenophilum, C. magnum and C. orchidearum species complexes. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 92, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Chen, Y.-J.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Jiang, H.-B.; Lin, C.-G.; Norphanphoun, C.; Sysouphanthong, P.; Pem, D.; et al. The numbers of fungi: Is the descriptive curve flattening? Fungal Divers. 2020, 103, 219–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. De Silva, D.D.; Ades, P.K.; Taylor, P.W.J. Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose of capsicum in Asia. Plant Pathol. 2021, 70, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, W.; Vaghefi, N.; Ades, P.K.; Edwards, J.; Crous, P.W.; Taylor, P.W.J. Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with citrus diseases in Australia using a leaf-based bioassay. Plant Pathol. 2025, 74, 2763–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Leonardi, G.R.; Aiello, D.; Camilleri, G.; Piattino, V.; Polizzi, G.; Guarnaccia, V. A new disease of kumquat (fortunella margarita) caused by Colletotrichum karsti: Twig and branch dieback. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2023, 62, 333–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mongkolporn, O.; Taylor, P.W.J. Chili anthracnose: Colletotrichum taxonomy and pathogenicity. Plant Pathol. 2018, 67, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shivas, R.G.; Tan, Y.P.; Edwards, J.; Dinh, Q.; Maxwell, A.; Andjic, V.; Liberato, J.R.; Anderson, C.; Beasley, D.R.; Bransgrove, K.; et al. Colletotrichum species in Australia. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2016, 45, 447–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rattanakreetakul, C.; Keawmanee, P.; Bincader, S.; Mongkolporn, O.; Phuntumart, V.; Chiba, S.; Pongpisutta, R. Two newly identified Colletotrichum species associated with mango anthracnose in central Thailand. Plants 2023, 12, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Armand, A.; Hyde, K.D.; Huanraluek, N.; Wang, Y.; Jayawardena, R.S. Identification and characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with durian fruit in northern Thailand. Mycosphere 2023, 14, 107–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Seifollahi, E.; de Farias, A.R.G.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Hyde, K.D. Taxonomic advances from fungal flora associated with ferns and fern-like hosts in northern Thailand. Plants 2023, 12, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Francl, L. The disease triangle: A plant pathological paradigm revisited. The plant health instructor. Doi: 10.1094; PHI: 2001.
  109. Li, H.; Pang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, C.; Sun, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, M.; Chen, Y.; Bian, Q. The identification, environmental factors, and fungicide sensitivity of Colletotrichum siamense causing leaf disease of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) in China. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. De Silva, D.D. Protecting the Australian capsicum industry from incursions of Colletotrichum pathogens. Ph. D. thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AUS, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  111. Debode, J.; Van Hemelrijck, W.; Baeyen, S.; Creemers, P.; Heungens, K.; Maes, M. Quantitative detection and monitoring of Colletotrichum acutatum in strawberry leaves using real-time PCR. Plant Pathol. 2009, 58, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ryazantsev, D.Y.; Chudinova, E.; Kokaeva, L.Y.; Elansky, S.; Balabko, P.; Belov, G.; Zavriev, S. Detection of Colletotrichum coccodes by real-time PCR. Biol. Bull. Rev. 2023, 13, S108–S113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Azevedo-Nogueira, F.; Gomes, S.; Lino, A.; Carvalho, T.; Martins-Lopes, P. Real-time PCR assay for Colletotrichum acutatum sensu stricto quantification in olive fruit samples. Food Chem. 2021, 339, 127858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. He, S.; Chen, H.; Wei, Y.; An, T.; Liu, S. Development of a DNA-based real-time PCR assay for the quantification of Colletotrichum camelliae growth in tea (Camellia sinensis). Plant Methods 2020, 16, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yang, J.; Duan, K.; Liu, Y.; Song, L.; Gao, Q.H. Method to detect and quantify colonization of anthracnose causal agent Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex in strawberry by real-time PCR. J. Phytopathol. 2022, 170, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Goulin, E.H.; dos Santos, P.J.C.; Dalio, R.D.; Machado, M.A. In vitro symptom induction of Colletotrichum abscissum infection in detached sweet orange flowers. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 101, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Weir, B.S.; Johnston, P.R.; Damm, U. The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Stud. Mycol. 2012, 73, 115–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Colletotrichum species associated with Citrus, with detailed information on Citrus species, host organ, disease symptom, country and references.
Table 1. Colletotrichum species associated with Citrus, with detailed information on Citrus species, host organ, disease symptom, country and references.
Colletotrichum species Host species Host organ Disease symptom Country Reference
Gloeosporioides complex
C. aenigma Citrus × sinensis NA NA Italy [93]
C. asianum Citrus grandis Asymptomatic twig Endophyte China [89]
C. australianum Citrus reticulata Fruit Anthracnose Australia [49]
Citrus × sinensis Fruit Anthracnose Australia [49]
C. endophyticum Citrus aurantiifolia Leaf Leaf spot Thailand [45]
Citrus reticulata Fruit or leaf Anthracnose Indonesia [82]
C. fructicola Citrus aurantiifolia Leaf Leaf spot Thailand [45,80]
Citrus bergamia Leaf Anthracnose China [50]
Citrus grandis Leaf Anthracnose China [50]
Citrus latifolia Branch Splitting Australia [49]
Citrus maxima Leaf Leaf spot Thailand [45,80]
Citrus maxima Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus nobilis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus reticulata Fruit Anthracnose Australia [49]
Citrus reticulata Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [43,87]
Citrus × sinensis Fruit Anthracnose China [62]
Citrus × sinensis Twig Anthracnose Tunisia [53]
Citrus tachibana Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
C. gloeosporioides Citrus aurantiifolia Fruit Anthracnose, Dryness, Fruit Rot Australia, China [49,63]
Leaf Leaf spot, Leaf lesion Thailand [45,80]
Twig Twig dieback Thailand [80]
Fruit or leaf Anthracnose Indonesia [82]
Citrus × aurantium Leaf Anthracnose Portugal [48]
Twig Twig dieback Thailand [80]
Citrus bergamia Fruit Fruit lesion Greece [42]
Citrus digitata Leaf Leaf lesion Italy [42]
Citrus floridana Fruit Fruit lesion Italy [42]
Citrus grandis Leaf Anthracnose China [50]
Asymptomatic branch Endophyte China [43]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [43]
Citrus japonica Fruit Anthracnose Australia [49]
Citrus limon Branch Anthracnose Portugal [48]
Flower Anthracnose Portugal [48]
Calyx Persistent calyx Mexico [57]
Immature fruit Yellowish immature fruits Mexico [57]
Fruit Fruit lesion, Anthracnose Mexico, Portugal, Turkey, Vietnam [48,54,81]
Leaf Leaf lesion, Anthracnose Australia, China, Mexico, Portugal, Spain [42,48,49,50,57]
Stem Stem spot Australia [49]
Twig Twigs withertip Algeria, Italy, Malta, Turkey [42,81,84]
Fruit or leaf Anthracnose Indonesia [82]
Dead fallen leaf Saprobe Australia [49]
Citrus maxima Leaf Leaf lesion Thailand [80]
Twigs Twigs withertip Greece [42]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus medica Leaf Leaf lesion Italy [42]
Citrus nobilis Fruit Anthracnose Vietnam [83]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus paradisi Fruit Anthracnose  Mexico [61]
Leaf Leaf lesion Portugal, Spain [42]
Twig Twigs withertip Italy, Spain [42]
Citrus reticulata Flower Anthracnose  Portugal [48]
Fruit Russeting, microcracking, Fruit spot, Fruit lesion, Anthracnose Australia, Portugal, Thailand, Turkey [45,48,49,80,81]
Leaf Leaf lesion, Leaf spot Australia, China, Greece, Italy, Thailand, Turkey [42,49,50,80,81]
Twig, shoot Twig dieback, Twigs withertip, Twig blight Australia, Italy, Spain, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, USA [42,45,46,51,80,81,85,86]
Fruit or leaf Anthracnose Indonesia [82]
Asymptomatic branch Endophyte China [43]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [43,87]
Asymptomatic tissue Latent infection USA [64]
Citrus × sinensis Branch Anthracnose  Portugal [48]
Flower Post-bloom fruit drop Brazil, Bermuda [69,73,75,76]
Flower Petal lesions Spain, Tunisia [42,52]
Flower Anthracnose Portugal [48]
Fruit Fruit lesion, Fruit tear stain, Anthracnose Australia, Brazil, Ghana, Italy, Morocco, Portugal, South Africa, Tunisia, Zimbabwe [42,48,49,52,53,54,55,56]
Leaf Leaf lesion, Leaf greasy spot, necrotic patches and mesophyll collapse, Anthracnose Australia, China, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Tunisia [42,48,49,50,51,52,53]
Stem Stem spot Australia [49]
Twig, shoot Twig dieback, Twigs withertip Australia, Algeria, Italy, Morocco, Portugal, Tunisia, Turkey, USA [42,51,52,53,56,81,84,85,86]
Preharvest fruits or leaves Anthracnose Italy [59]
NA NA  New Zealand [117]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [43]
Leaf litter Saprobe Malta [42]
Asymptomatic tissue Latent infection USA [64]
Citrus tachibana Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus × tangelo Twig Twig dieback, Twigs withertip Tunisia [46]
Citrus unchiu Asymptomatic branch Endophyte China [43]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [43]
Leaf Saprobe China [43]
Citrus sp. Twig Twigs withertip China, Pakistan [58,67]
Mandarin-like hybrid ‘Mandared’ Twig Twig dieback Italy [51]
Leaf Necrotic patches and mesophyll collapse Italy [51]
C. helleniense Citrus reticulata Fruit Fruit lesion Greece [42]
Citrus trifoliata (syn. Poncirus trifoliata) Twig Twigs withertip Greece [42]
C. hystricis Citrus hystrix Leaf Leaf lesion Italy [42]
C. kahawae subsp. ciggaro(C. cigarro) Citrus reticulata Leaf Light brown necrotic lesions Italy [90]
C. queenslandicum Citrus aurantiifolia Fruit or leaf Anthracnose Indonesia [82]
Citrus × latifolia Leaf Anthracnose  USA [91]
C. siamense Citrus australasica Fruit Anthracnose Australia [49]
Citrus aurantiifolia Fruit Anthracnose Thailand [80]
Leaf Leaf spot Thailand [45,80]
Twig Twig dieback Thailand [80]
Citrus × aurantium Twig Twig dieback Thailand [80]
Leaf Leaf lesion Thailand [80]
Citrus grandis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [89]
Citrus hystrix Fruit Fruit stem end rot Thailand [45]
Citrus × latifolia Twig Twig dieback Thailand [80]
Citrus limon Fruit Anthracnose Australia [49]
Fruit NA Vietnam [54]
Citrus maxima Branch Branch canker Thailand [45]
Leaf Leaf spot Thailand [80,85]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus nobilis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus nobilis × Citrus deliciosa Fruit Fruit stem end rot, fruit drop India [44]
Twig Twig drying India [44]
Citrus pennivesiculata Fruit NA Bangladesh, Egypt [54]
Citrus reticulata
Fruit Fruit spot Thailand, China [45,60]
Leaf Leaf spot China, Thailand [45,60]
Twig Twig dieback, Twigs withertip Pakistan, Thailand [45,65]
Citrus × sinensis Fruit Fruit Rot India [88]
Citrus sp. Twig Twigs withertip Pakistan [67]
C. syzygicola Citrus aurantiifolia Fruit Anthracnose Thailand [92]
C. tainanense Citrus grandis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [89]
C. theobromicola Citrus aurantiifolia Fruit Anthracnose Australia [49]
C. tomentosae Citrus grandis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [89]
Colletotrichumsp. Citrus australasica Leaf/fruit spot Australia [49]
Boninense complex
C. boninense Citrus medica Leaf Anthracnose China [50]
C. catinaense Citrus aurantiifolia Twigs Twigs withertip Italy [42]
Citrus reticulata Leaf Leaf lesion Italy [42]
Citrus × sinensis Fruit Fruit tear stain Portugal [42]
C. citricola Citrus maxima Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus unchiu Leaf Saprobe China [43]
C. constrictum Citrus limon Fruit Fruit rot New Zealand [95]
C. karstii Citrus grandis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [43]
Asymptomatic shoot Endophyte China [43]
Asymptomatic branch Endophyte China [43]
Citrus limon Branch Anthracnose  Portugal [48]
Fruit Fruit lesion, Anthracnose Italy, Portugal, South Africa, Turkey [42,48,54,81,94]
Leaf Leaf lesion, Anthracnose Australia, China, Portugal, Spain, Turkey [42,43,48,49,81]
Twigs Twigs withertip Portugal, Turkey [42,94]
Asymptomatic branch Endophyte China [43]
Citrus margarita (syn. Fortunella margarita) Leaf Leaf lesion Italy [42]
Fruit Fruit tear stain Italy [42]
Twig Twig dieback Italy [102]
Branch Branch dieback Italy [102]
Citrus maxima Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus nobilis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus paradisi Leaf Leaf lesion Spain [42]
Twigs Twigs withertip Italy [42]
Citrus reticulata Leaf Leaf lesion China, Italy [42,50]
Twig, shoot Twig dieback, Twigs withertip Australia, Spain, Turkey, USA [42,81,85,86]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Asymptomatic tissue Latent infection USA [64]
Citrus × sinensis Fruit Fruit lesion Italy, South Africa, Tunisia [42,52,54]
Leaf Leaf lesion, Leaf greasy spot Australia, China, Italy, Spain [42,49,50]
Twig, shoot Twig dieback, Twigs withertip Australia, Italy, Malta, Portugal, USA [42,51,85,86]
Asymptomatic tissue Latent infection USA [64]
Preharvest fruits or leaves Anthracnose Italy [59]
Citrus tachibana Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus sp. NA NA  New Zealand [95]
C. limonicola Citrus limon Leaf Leaf lesion Malta [42]
C. novae -zelandiae Citrus limon Twigs Twigs withertip Malta [42]
Leaf Leaf lesion Malta [42]
Citrus paradisi Fruit NA  New Zealand [95]
Leaf Leaf lesion Greece [42]
Citrus reticulata Twig Twig dieback Australia [86]
Citrus × sinensis Twig Twig dieback, Twigs withertip Australia, Malta [42,86]
Acutatum complex
C. abscissum Citrus × sinensis Flowers Post-bloom fruit drop Brazil, USA [69,72,73,74,75,76]
C. acutatum Citrus limon Leaf Leaf lesion Italy [42]
Citrus × sinensis Leaf Leaf lesion Italy [42]
C. citri Citrus aurantiifolia Shoot Anthracnose China [43]
C. godetiae Citrus aurantium Fruit Fruit rot  Unknown [70]
C. johnstonii Citrus australasica Fruit Fruit rot Australia [96]
Citrus sp. Fruit Fruit rot New Zealand [70]
C. limetticola Key lime (Citrus aurantiifolia) Twig Key lime anthracnose  USA [70]
C. simmondsii Citrus reticulata Fruit Anthracnose  China [9]
Magnum complex
C. brevisporum Citrus grandis NA Endophyte  China [5]
Citrus medica Leaf Anthracnose China [50]
C. guangdongense Citrus grandis Asymptomatic twig Endophyte China [89]
C. kokhaense Citrus aurantiifolia Leaf Leaf lesion Thailand [80]
Gigasporum complex 
C. citri-maximae Citrus maximum Asymptomatic fruit Endophyte China [54]
C. gigasporum Citrus aurantiifolia Twig Twig dieback Thailand [80]
Citrus maxima Leaf Leaf lesion Thailand [80]
Citrus nobilis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Dracaenophilum complex
C. tropicicola Citrus maxima Leaf Leaf lesion Thailand [80,97]
Twig Twig dieback Thailand [80]
Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus × latifolia Leaf Leaf lesion Thailand [80]
Citrus sp. NA NA  Mexico [98]
Orchidearum complex
C. plurivorum Citrus aurantiifolia Leaf Leaf spot Thailand [45,80]
Citrus grandis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [89]
Citrus maxima Leaf Leaf lesion Thailand [80]
Citrus nobilis Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Citrus tachibana Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Truncatum complex
C. truncatum Citrus flamea Shoot Anthracnose China [43]
Citrus limon Leaf Anthracnose China [43]
Citrus tachibana Asymptomatic leaf Endophyte China [87]
Singleton species
C. citrus-medicae Citrus medica Leaf Leaf spot  China [99]
Table 2. Controlled environment bioassays testing the pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with Citrus.
Table 2. Controlled environment bioassays testing the pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species associated with Citrus.
Colletotrichum species Tested host species Tested organ Inoculation method (W, NW or NA)a Inoculum Analysis based on Results shown as Reference
Colletotrichum acutatum, C. gloeosporioides and C. karstii Sweet orange (Citrus × sinensis) ‘Tarocco Scirè’, lemon (C. limon) ‘Femminello 2Kr’ and bergamot (C. bergamia) ‘Fantastico’ In planta twig (around 0.5 cm diameter) W Mycelium plug (3 mm side) Lesion length (mm)
(14 days post inoculation)
Mean value of each species [51]
Lemon ‘Femminello 2Kr’ Green fruitlet W Mycelium plug (3 mm side) Symptom description
(3 and 6 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
Sweet orange
‘Tarocco Meli’ and lemon ‘Femminello 2Kr’
Mature fruit W and NW Mycelium plug (3 mm side) Lesion area (mm2)
(12 days post inoculation)
Mean value of each species
Sweet orange ‘Moro’ and ‘Navelina’ Expanded young and mature leaves W and NW Mycelium plug (3 mm side) Lesion area (mm2)
(5 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
Apple (Malus domestica) ‘Fuji’ and ‘Cripps Pink’ Mature fruit W Mycelium plug (3 mm side) Lesion area (mm2)
(7 days post inoculation)
Mean value of each species
C. australianum, C. fructicola, C. karstii, C. novae-zelandiae, C. siamense, C. theobromicola, and C. gloeosporioides Lemon (Citrus × limon ‘Eureka’), Meyer lemon (Citrus × meyeri) and orange (Citrus × sinensis ‘Washington Navel’) Leaf (3 weeks after bud appearance, 4 cm in length lemon and Meyer lemon leaves, 5 cm in length orange leaves) NW Spore suspension (6 μl)
(106 conidia per ml)
Infection incidence (%) and lesions diameter (mm)
(lemon and Meyer lemon leaves were measured 3 and 5 days post inoculation; orange leaves were measured only at 3 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate [101]
C. gigasporum, C. kokhaense, C. gloeosporioides, C. plurivorum, and C. siamense Lime (Citrus aurantiifolia cultivar ‘Pan Pichit’), and tangerine (C. reticulata cultivar Sai Nam Phueng) Mature fruit W and NW Mycelial disc (5 mm in diameter) Disease rating and disease index
(2 weeks post inoculation for the orange fruits and 3 weeks post inoculation for the lime fruits)
Value of each isolate [80]
Lime cultivars ‘Pan Pichit’ and ‘Nam Phueng’, and tangerine cultivar Sai Nam Phueng Seedling (6 weeks old) NW Mycelial disc (5 mm in diameter) Disease rating and disease index
(4 weeks post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
Lime cultivar ‘Pan Pichit’, and tangerine cultivar Sai Nam Phueng In planta shoot (1 or 2 weeks old) W Mycelial disc (5 mm in diameter) Disease rating
(2 months after inoculation for lime and 2.5 months
after inoculation for orange)
Value of each isolate
C. gloeosporioides, C. karstii, and C. novae-zelandiae Lemon (Citrus × limon ‘Eureka’) In planta twig (20 days since bud appearance) W Mycelial plug (4 mm2) Symptom description
(7 weeks after inoculation)
Value of each isolate [86]
Lemon ‘Eureka’ and orange (Citrus × sinensis ‘Washington Navel’) Twig (20 days since bud appearance) NW Spore suspension (6 μl)
(106 conidia per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(lemon twigs recorded at days 4 and 7; orange twigs recorded at day 4)
Value of each isolate
W Spore suspension (6 μl)
(106 conidia per ml)
Lesion size (mm)
(lemon twigs recorded at days 4 and 7; orange twigs recorded at day 4)
Value of each isolate
C. siamense, C. gloeosporioides, C. fructicola, C. endophyticum, and C. plurivorum Acid lime (C. aurantifolia) Mid-ripened fruit W Fungal discs (5 mm) Lesion diameter (mm)
(5 to 6 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate [45]
Mandarin (Citrus reticulata) Ripe fruit W Fungal discs (5 mm) Pathogenic or not pathogenic
(5 to 6 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
Acid lime and pomelo (C. maxima) Leaf W Fungal discs (5 mm) Pathogenic or not pathogenic
(5 to 6 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
Acid lime Young branch (around 20 cm in length and 0.5 cm in diameter) W Fungal discs (5 mm) Pathogenic or not pathogenic
(14 to 16 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
C. gloeosporioides and C. karstii Lemon (Citrus limon) cv. Interdonato Twig, leaf, and fruit NW Mycelial plug (5mm) Lesion length (mm)
(10 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate [81]
C. gloeosporioides Apple cv. Gala, pear cv. Santa Maria, banana cv. Cavendish, pepper cv. Capia and avocado cv. Fuerte Fruit W Spore suspension (20 μl)
(106 spores per ml)
Lesion length (mm)
(10 days post inoculation)
Value of the isolate
C. australianum, C. fructicola, C. gloeosporioides, C. karstii, C. theobromicola, Colletotrichum sp. Orange (Citrus × sinensis ‘Washington Navel’ Mature fruit W and NW Spore suspension (6 μl)
(106 conidia per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(10 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate [49]
Orange ‘Washington Navel’ and Meyer lemon (Citrus × meyeri) Fully expanded leaf NW Spore suspension (6 μl)
(106 conidia per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(10 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
Orange ‘Washington Navel’ Flower petal NW Spore suspension (6 μl)
(103 conidia per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(3 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
C. gloeosporioides, C. karstii, and acutatum Sweet orange ‘Valencia Late’, mandarin ‘Encore’, lemon ‘Lisbon’ and Key lime Potted plants (Leaf, flower, branch) NA Spore suspension (sprayed to runoff)
(106 spores per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(10 days post inoculation in leaves, 5 days in flowers and 45 days in branches)
Value of each isolate [48]
Flower (closed blossoms) NW Spore suspension (20 μl)
(106 spores per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(5 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
Leaf (5 to 7 days old) W Spore suspension (20 μl)
(106 spores per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(10 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
Mature fruits W Spore suspension (20 μl)
(106 spores per ml)
Symptom description
(10 days post inoculation)
Only isolates of C. gloeosporioides
C. gloeosporioides, C. fructicola, C. citri, and C. truncatum Citrus reticulata Blanco Fruit W Spore suspension (2.5 μl)
(104 conidia per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(12 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate [43]
C. gloeosporioides and C. karstii Orange (Citrus
sinensis (L.) Osbeck) ‘Valencia’ and lemon (C. limon L.) ‘Eureka’
Fruit W Spore suspension (10 µl)
(105 conidia per ml)
Lesion diameter (mm)
(7 days after inoculation)
Value of each isolate [52]
C. gloeosporioides and C. karstii Citrus sinensis ‘Tarocco Scirè’ and ‘Tarocco Nucellare’ Fruit W Spore suspension (10 μl)
(105 conidia per ml)
Disease incidence (%) and symptom severity (cm)
(15 days after inoculation)
Mean value of each species [59]
C. acutatum, C. catinaense, C. gloeosporioides, C. helleniense, C. hystricis, C. karstii, C. limonicola, C. novae-zelandiae Sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) clones (‘Tarocco
Scirè’ and ‘Tarocco Nucellare’)
Fruit W Spore suspension (10 μl)
(105 conidia per ml)
Infection incidence (%)
(10 days after inoculation)
Value of each isolate [42]
C. endophyticum, C. queenslandicum and C. gloeosporioides Mandarin (Citrus reticulata) ‘Keprok Batu 55’ and lemon (Citrus limon) ‘California’ Fruit W Mycelium disc (±5 mm) Lesion diameter (cm) and lesion depth (cm)
(9 days after inoculation)
Value of each isolate [82]
C. karstii Apple (Malus domestica (Suckow) Borkh.) cultivar ‘Golden Delicious’ Fruit W Spore suspension (20 μl)
(105 conidia per ml)
Disease incidence (%) and lesion diameter (cm)
(7 days after inoculation)
Value of each isolate [102]
Kumquat (Citrus margarita) plants grafted to volkamerian lemon (C. volkameriana Ten. & Pasq.) rootstock Twig W Mycelium plug
(4 mm diameter)
Disease incidence (%) (20 days after inoculation) Value of each isolate
C. gloeosporioides like and C. fructicola like Orange varieties ‘Thomson’, ‘Meski’ and ‘Malti’, lemon variety ‘Lunari’ and sweet lime variety ‘Bergamot’ Fruit W Mycelial plug (0.5 cm diameter), and filter paper (0.5 × 0.5 cm) soaked in spore suspension (105 conidia per ml) Lesion area (cm2)
(2 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate [53]
Leaf NA Filter paper soaked in spore suspension (105 conidia per ml) Lesion area (cm2)
(7 to 10 days post inoculation)
Value of each isolate
a Abbreviations: W, wound inoculated; NW, non-wound inoculated; NA, wound or non-wound inoculation was not mentioned.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.