Submitted:
18 August 2026
Posted:
19 August 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
The 1970 Bhola Cyclone is usually narrated through catastrophic mortality, political rupture, and the subsequent expansion of cyclone preparedness in Bangladesh. Its long-term psychosocial, disability, caregiving, and intergenerational consequences remain far less visible. This critical narrative review distinguishes direct Bhola-specific evidence from contextual evidence derived from later cyclones and related disasters in Bangladesh. Direct evidence is strongest for mortality, political and institutional change, and life-course losses in adult health, education, and consumption among people exposed early in life. Bhola-specific evidence is limited or absent for prolonged grief, post-traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, disability trajectories, functional decline, gendered caregiving, migration histories, and intergenerational memory. Contextual studies nevertheless show that cyclone resilience is shaped by psychological distress, livelihood and food insecurity, inaccessible shelters and sanitation, age-related evacuation barriers, warning credibility, institutional trust, and community volunteerism. The review reframes resilience as more than survival: sustainable disaster risk reduction requires dignity, functioning, equitable access, social participation, trusted institutions, and long-term well-being. It concludes with measurable policy indicators and a research agenda linking mental health, disability inclusion, age-sensitive preparedness, social protection, accessible infrastructure, and community governance to the Sendai Framework and the Sustainable Development Goals.
Keywords:
Bhola Cyclone
; Bangladesh
; disaster risk reduction
; social sustainability
; psychosocial well-being
; disability inclusion
; community resilience
; cyclone preparedness
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.