Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Degradable Acrylate-Telechelic Copolymers with Disulfide and β-Thioester Linkages by Simultaneous Thiol Oxidation and Thiol-Ene Michael Addition Click Reactions with the Same Base Catalyst

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

05 August 2026

Posted:

07 August 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This study reports on a new one-pot copolymerization process by simultaneous oxidative disulfide and β-thioester formation by reacting bifunctional monomers, 3,6-dioxa-1,8-octane-dithiol (DODT) with diacrylates, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDODA), in the presence of N,N,N’,N’’,N’’-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA), as the same base catalyst for both reactions, in air at room temperature with short reaction times. The resulting random copolymers consist off disulfide linkages between DODTs and β-thioester units formed by thiol-ene Michael addition click reaction. With stoichiometric DODT/diacrylate feed ratio, diacrylate-telechelic copolymers are obtained. The Tgs of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers are nearly constant at around -53 °C, while it decreases with increasing HDODA content in the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymers. Reductive degradation with thiols, such as 2-mercaptoethanol and dithiothreitol, led to chain scission via the disulfide-thiol exchange reaction. Treatment with NaOH solution resulted in further degradation by hydrolysis of the β-thioester units. These results indicate that these novel copolymers are fully degradable under mild conditions. This new process, applying simultaneous thiol oxidation and thiol-ene reactions, enables to prepare a large variety of sulfur-containing endfunctional degradable copolymers useful for a broad range of advanced application possibilities.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Sulfur containing polymers have gained significant interest in recent years due to the versatile properties and advanced application possibilities of such materials, ranging from recyclability to energy storage devices, e.g., Li-sulfur batteries, biomaterials, drug delivery matrices, self-healing constructs, metal-ion adsorbents, etc. (see e.g., Refs. [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] and references therein). Undoubtedly, among such materials, macromolecules with in-chain or pendant disulfide linkages belong to one of the most widely investigated classes of polymers nowadays [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. This is related to the unique dynamic redox property of the disulfides, that is, cleavage by reduction and disulfide formation by oxidation of the resulting thiols, which can be purposefully utilized in various fields. Polymers by disulfide units can be obtained, for instance, by ring-opening polymerization of dithiolanes [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], polymerization of disulfide containing monomers [19,20,21,22,23,24,25], thiol disulfide exchange [26] or oxidative coupling of bifunctional or multifunctional thiols [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. An interesting oxidative coupling process of dithiols, such as 3,6-dioxa-1,8-octane-dithiol (DODT), thiol-telechelic polyisobutylene and alkane-dithiols, by hydrogen peroxide in air via catalysis with a base for the formation of disulfide containing polymers with unique properties was reported by Puskas et al. [32,33,34,35,36,37]. These authors called this reaction as radical ring-opening redox polymerization (R3P), which is claimed to result in macrocycles and to fulfill the green chemistry criteria as well [32,33,34].
Polymers formed by thiol-ene click reactions belong to another widely investigated class of sulfur containing macromolecules. Although the addition of a thiol to an olefinic double bond was discovered in the early years of the 20th century [39], this reaction has been in the focus of scientific interest in polymer research and development only in the last two decades [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. There are two major processes to obtain polymers by thiol-ene reactions, i.e., radical addition of thiyl radicals, formed by thermal initiation or photoinitiation, to double bond containing molecules [40,41,42,43] or by thiol-ene Michael addition [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. The thiol-ene Michael addition reaction can be catalyzed by a nucleophile, usually by a base, such as amines, leading to a protonated base and thiolate anion, which react with the olefin, and the formed carbanion is neutralized by capturing the proton from the protonated base [62]. By using bifunctional or multifunctional thiols and acrylates, a variety of poly(β-thioester)s or polymers with β-thioester moieties have been prepared by the thiol-ene Michael addition click reaction [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. Junkers et al. [44,45,46,47] reported on the synthesis of poly(β-thioester)s with this click polymerization process and demonstrated the degradability of these polymers via hydrolysis with strong bases and also under biologically relevant conditions [45,46]. Others accomplished the synthesis of various β-thioester containing polymers with a broad range of application possibilities, such as solid polymer electrolytes, polymer-peptide conjugates, herbicide delivery polymers, hyperbranched polymers, noble metal recovery materials, thermoresponsive polymers, hydrogels, reprocessable elastomers, polymers with high encapsulation stability, etc. [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. Koshaka and coworkers [61] carried out step-growth tandem polymerization of dithiols and α-(halomethyl)acrylates with the involvement of the thiol-ene Michael addition reaction in this process. These examples indicate well the versatility of the thiol-ene Michael addition click reaction for obtaining various novel macromolecular assemblies with unique structure, properties and application possibilities.
In this study, inspired by the common feature of the oxidative coupling of thiols with hydrogen peroxide as oxidant and the thiol-ene Michael addition click reactions, that is, by using the same catalyst, i.e., a base, we report on a new process and the resulting novel copolymers containing both disulfide and β-thioester units, formed simultaneously in one reaction medium. We attempted the syntheses of such a new class of copolymers by the competitive oxidative coupling of a dithiol and the thiol-ene reaction by adding diacrylate comonomers, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDODA), to the oxidative polymerization of DODT with H2O2 in the presence of a base in open air and under energy saving room temperature conditions. Surprisingly, this easy-to-use process led to copolymers containing not only degradable disulfide and β-thioester units, but to acrylate-terminated polymers as well under proper conditions without the need of any additional end-functionalization process. This robust new synthetic route, which combines two simultaneous reactions with the involvement of a dithiol and a diacrylate, and the resulting functional degradable copolymers are expected to open new ways for the preparation of a variety of novel macromolecular assemblies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

3,6-Dioxa-octane-1,8-dithiol (DODT) and N,N,N’,N’’,N’’-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) were purchased from TCI (Zwijndrecht, Belgium), 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDODA) from Polysciences (Hirschberg, Germany), tetrahydrofuran (THF) and methanol from VWR International (Debrecen, Hungary), whereas poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (Mn = 250 g/mol) (PEGDA), 30 wt% aqueous solution of H2O2, 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) and dithiothreitol (DTT) from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). PEGDA and HDODA were purified by passing through a column filled with basic Al2O3. Other reagents were used as received.

2.2. Synthesis Procedures

2.2.1. Preparation of P(DODT-co-PEGDA) and P(DODT-co-HDODA) Copolymers

A representative copolymerization of DODT and PEGDA in 1:1 molar ratio was carried out in a round bottom flask open to air by adding first 0.25 ml (1.54 mmol) of DODT dissolved in 3.0 ml THF. Subsequently, 0.21 ml (1.01 mmol) PMDETA (1 equivalent amine to the thiol groups) and 0.35 ml (1.55 mmol) PEGDA were added to the reaction mixture followed by the immediate addition of 0.75 ml 6.5 wt% diluted aqueous solution of H2O2 (1.47 mmol, withdrawn from the mixture of 1.0 ml 30 wt% H2O2 solution and 4.0 ml distilled water). After 15 minutes rection time, methanol was added to the opaque solution in which the obtained polymer was precipitated, followed by decanting the solvent and drying the resulting polymer to constant weight under vacuum at room temperature.
For the scaled-up synthesis of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer, DODT (16.6 ml, 0.1 mol), PEGDA (23.3 ml, 0.1 mol), and PMDETA (14.0 ml, 0.067 mol) were dissolved in distilled THF (200 ml), followed by the immediate addition of hydrogen peroxide (10 ml, 6.5 wt%). The reaction mixture was stirred without external heating or cooling at ambient temperature for 10 mins. After completion of the reaction, the copolymer was precipitated by addition of large excess of methanol. The resulting milky suspension was left to sediment, followed by decanting the solvent and drying the resulting polymer to constant weight under vacuum at room temperature.

2.2.2. Experiments with Sequential Addition of the Reactants

Experiments with sequential addition of the reactants were performed by charging the components in open reactors at room temperature at predetermined time intervals. First, to the solution of 0.5 ml (3.07 mmol) DODT, 0.43 ml (2.06 mmol) PMDETA, 6.0 ml THF and 0.69 ml (3.06 mmol) PEGDA, 1.57 ml 6.5 wt% diluted aqueous solution of H2O2 (3.07 mmol) were added. After 15 minutes reaction time, the half volume of the reaction mixture was withdrawn and precipitated in methanol (sample s1-1). Subsequently, the solution of 0.25 ml (1.54 mmol) DODT, 0.22 ml (1.05 mmol) PMDETA, 3.0 ml THF and 0.35 ml (1.55 mmol) PEGDA were added, followed by charging 0.78 ml 6.5 wt% aqueous solution of H2O2 (1.53 mmol). After another 15 minutes reaction time, half of the reaction mixture was also withdrawn and precipitated in methanol (sample s1-2) followed by the addition of the same monomer and oxidant solution in the remaining reaction mixture as mentioned above. After subsequent 15 minutes reaction time the experiment was stopped by the precipitation of the formed polymer in methanol (sample s1-3).
The experiment with sequential DODT and oxidant addition was performed by first carrying out the reaction with charging 1.57 ml of 6.5 wt% aqueous solution of H2O2 (3.07 mmol) to the solution of 0.5 ml (3.07 mmol) DODT, 0.43 ml (2.06 mmol) PMDETA, 6.0 ml THF and 0.69 ml (3.06 mmol) PEGDA. After 15 minutes reaction time, half of the volume of the reaction mixture was withdrawn and precipitated in methanol (sample s2-1). Subsequently, the solution of 0.25 ml (1.54 mmol) DODT, 0.22 ml (1.05 mmol) PMDETA and 3.0 ml THF were added, followed by charging 0.78 ml of 6.5 wt% diluted aqueous solution of H2O2 (1.53 mmol). After another 15 minutes reaction time, half of the reaction mixture was also withdrawn and precipitated in methanol (sample s2-2) followed by the addition of the same monomer and oxidant solution as mentioned above. After subsequent 15 minutes reaction time, the experiment was stopped by precipitation of the formed polymer in methanol (sample s2-3).

2.2.3. Reduction of the Disulfide Units in P(DODT-co-PEGDA) and P(DODT-co-HDODA) Copolymers

For the reduction, that is, scission of the disulfide linkages, 60 mg of the given copolymer was dissolved in 3.0 ml THF and 0.053 ml (0.76 mmol) 2-mercaptoethanol was added to the reaction mixture. After stirring for 17 hours at room temperature, methanol was added to the solution in which the product was precipitated, and then dried under vacuum at room temperature.
Further reductive degradation studies of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer were performed using dithiothreitol (DTT) followed by the addition of NaOH solution for hydrolysis of the β-thioester linkages. For these experiments, P(DODT-co-PEGDA) (0.40 g, Mₙ= 4500 g/mol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (5 ml), followed by the addition of 0.40 g DTT (2.60 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. Subsequently, the resulting solution was divided into two equal portions. The first portion was concentrated under reduced pressure, dried overnight under vacuum at room temperature, washed with diethyl ether, and dried again under vacuum for subsequent characterization. The second portion was subjected to alkaline hydrolysis by adding 2 ml of aqueous NaOH solution (1 M) under continuous nitrogen bubbling. After stirring overnight at room temperature, chloroform was added to extract the degradation products. The organic phase was separated, dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, concentrated under reduced pressure, and dried under vacuum.

2.3. Characterization Methods

The 1H NMR spectra of the polymers were recorded on a Varian 500 MHz spectrometer (Varian Inova, CA, USA) in CDCl3 at room temperature.
Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) of the synthesized polymers was carried out with an instruments equipped with two Styragel HR columns (HR1 and HR4), Waters 515 HPLC pump, Waters 717 Autosampler, Jetstream Column Thermostat (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and Agilent 1260 Infinity refractive index detector (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) applying tetrahydrofuran as eluent with 0.3 ml/min flow rate at 35 °C. The molecular weight data were obtained by evaluation of the chromatograms on the basis of calibration made with polystyrene standards of narrow molecular weight distribution.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed on a Mettler TG50 equipment (Mettler Toledo, Leicester, UK) in the -100 °C to +200 °C temperature range with 10 °C/min heating rate. The second heating curves were evaluated, and the inflection points of the DSC thermograms were recorded as glass transition temperatures.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Synthesis of P(DODT-co-PEGDA) Copolymers with Disulfide and β-Thioester Linkages via Two Simultaneous Click Reactions

A thiol is known to form thiolate by reacting with amine bases even under mild conditions [62]. In the simultaneous presence of an oxidant, like H2O2, and an acrylate, two processes can take place. The oxidation of the thiolate with H2O2 leads to thiyl radicals, the combination of which results in a disulfide, as proposed for the oxidative polymerization of DODT [32,33,34,35,36,37], while the Michael addition of the thiolate to the double bond of the acrylate yields a β-thioester [62] as displayed in Scheme 1a. To investigate whether the thiolate can take part simultaneously in both the thiol-ene Michael addition and the disulfide formation by the oxidation reaction, the polymerization of a dithiol, DODT, was performed in the presence of a bifunctional acrylate comonomer, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) (Table 1). As shown in Table 1, polymers with yields ranging from 40-70% were formed in this process.
Figure 1 shows the 1H NMR spectrum of the polymeric product obtained with 50:50 molar ratio of DODT and PEGDA in the feed (c1-50). The absence of the thiol (–SH) triplet peak at 1.58 ppm indicates that there are no –SH chain endgroups in the formed macromolecules [32]. However, it can be concluded that unreacted terminal acrylate groups, the signals of whose olefinic protons can be found at 6.40, 6.15 and 5.84 ppm, are present in these polymer chains. Additional to the triplet peak of the methylene protons adjacent to the disulfide bonds at 2.88 ppm, three different signals can be found at 2.82, 2.72 and 2.64 ppm. Since all of these three peaks are triplets with the same integrated area, they can be assigned to the methylene protons of the ~-CH2-S-CH2-CH2-CO-O-~ β-thioester sequences in the chains, formed by thiol-ene Michael addition between DODT and PEGDA. This is in accordance with presence of the two triplets at 4.24 and 4.31 ppm, the former of which has the same integrated area as the methylenes adjacent to the C-S-C sulfur, while the latter has an integrated area value twice of the peaks of the olefinic protons. Therefore, these two triplets at 4.24 and 4.31 ppm can be assigned as the methylene groups adjacent to the ester groups in the saturated and unsaturated acrylate groups, respectively. The multiplets at 3.62 and 3.70 ppm belong to the ethylene glycol groups both in the PEGDA and DODT units, and their total integrated area are in good accordance with the calculated amount of the incorporated PEGDA and DODT units determined on the basis of the aforementioned assignations. All these indicate that the reaction shown in Scheme 1b can be proposed for the formation of P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers, that is, thiol-ene coupling reaction occurs between the DODT and PEGDA simultaneously with the oxidative coupling of DODT yielding random copolymers with both disulfide and β-thioester units in the chain. Thus, this structural analysis clearly indicates that a copolymer with terminal acrylate groups is formed with 50:50 molar ratio of DODT/PEGDA in the feed. The structure of this copolymer is displayed in Scheme 1c. From the 1H NMR spectra, the DODT and PEGDA contents in the copolymers can also be estimated (Table 1). Although somewhat higher DODT content is found in the copolymers than in the feed, which is due to the consumption of DODT also in the disulfide formation in addition to the thiol-ene reaction, the composition of these novel copolymers can be well controlled in a broad composition range by the proper variation of the DODT/PEGDA feed ratio.
As presented in Figure 2, gel permeation chromatography analysis also proves the formation of uniform polymer products, because monomodal peaks can be observed in all cases. As the data clearly shows in Table 1, copolymers with relatively narrow molecular weight distributions, with dispersity values in the range of 1.3-2.3 range, are obtained, and increasing the DODT content in the feed results in molecular weight increase (Table 1) in line with the shift of the GPC chromatograms toward lower elution volumes as displayed in Figure 2.
The number average molecular weights (Mn) can also be determined on the basis of the integral values of the signals of the 1H NMR spectra of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers when the signals of the terminal acrylate groups are visible in the spectra, such as in the case of the c1-50 sample, that is, when stoichiometric amounts of DODT and PEGDA are reacted. This led to Mn of 4.5 kg/mol, which is relatively close to the Mn value estimated by the evaluation of the GPC curve. However, when the DODT is in excess to PEGDA, like in the case of the c1-60 sample, the Mn determination on the basis of integration of the acrylate double bond signals leads to higher than expected Mn value. The presence of acrylate double bonds cannot be detected in the 1H NMR spectra of samples prepared with higher DODT/PEGDA ratios (samples c1-70, c1-80 and c1-90). These findings are in agreement with the reported macrocycle formation between oxidized DODT by combination of the thiyl radicals [32,33,34], and the macrocyclic copolymer chains do not have acrylate terminal groups as shown in Scheme 2. These findings allow to conclude that, while macrocycles are obtained with higher than one DODT/PEGDA ratios, acrylate-telechelic P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers are formed with stoichiometric DODT-PEGDA feed ratio in the course of simultaneous oxidative disulfide formation and thiol-ene Michael addition catalyzed by PMDETA as a base catalyst.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were also performed on the obtained copolymer samples. The DSC curves indicate the presence of only one glass transition in the -100–+200 °C temperature range (Figure 3). The glass transition temperatures of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers, however, do not change with the increasing DODT content in the copolymers (Figure 4), which can be explained by the presence of ethylene oxide units in both the PEGDA and DODT monomer units.
The solubility of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers was tested in a series of solvents from highly polar water to low polarity compounds, like n-hexane and diethyl ether. As shown in Table 2, unexpectedly, the copolymers are not soluble in polar solvents, such as water, methanol and ethanol, although both pure comonomers, having ethylene glycol units, are soluble in such solvents, like low molecular weight alcohols. This finding can be explained by the formation of the β-thioester and the nonpolar disulfide linkages in these copolymers. As expected, nonpolar solvents, such as n-hexane, diethyl ether, are also non-solvents for the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers. Polar organic solvents, which are known to good solvents for polyesters, like acetone, THF, methyl ethyl ketone, acetonitrile, DMF etc., proved to be good solvents for these novel copolymers.

3.2. P(DODT-co-HDODA) Copolymers by Simultaneous Disulfide and β-Thioester Formation

The copolymerization of DODT was also carried out with another acrylate comonomer, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDODA) in the presence of H2O2 oxidant and the PMDETA amine base. Figure 5 shows the 1H NMR spectrum of copolymer obtained by using 1:1 molar ratio of DODT and HDODA under conditions identical to that of the preparation of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers. This spectrum clearly indicates the formation of P(DODT-co-PEGDA) with acrylate termini and a structure similar to that displayed for the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers with disulfide and β-thioester linkages as shown in Scheme 1c, with the difference that HDODA units replace the PEGDA segments. As the data in Table 3 indicate, the molar ratio of DODT incorporated in the obtained copolymers, determined on the basis of the 1H NMR spectra, is higher than in the feed or nearly equal (as in samples c2-80 and c2-90). It is also noteworthy to mention that the incorporation of DODT in relative excess decreases systematically with its increasing feed ratio, that is, from 11 mol% for the c2-50 sample (61 mol% in the sample compared to 50 mol% in the feed) to practically zero in the c2-80 and c2-90 samples.
The GPC chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymers are displayed in Figure 6. Similar to the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers, the GPC curves clearly indicate that copolymers with monomodal distributions are formed in the reaction of DODT with HDODA as well, on the one hand. On the other hand, as these chromatograms and the molecular weight data in Table 3 show, increasing the DODT/HDODA ratio in the feed leads to an increase of the molecular weights of the formed copolymers. The Mn determined on the basis of the integration values of the 1H NMR signals in comparison to the integration value of the acrylate double bond signals indicate the same trend, that is, the molecular weight of the copolymers increase with increasing the DODT content in the feed. This is due to the higher probability of the chain-chain coupling via disulfide formation, which is reflected by the fact that the molecular weight distributions broaden with increasing DODT content. Because thiol endgroups cannot be detected in the NMR spectra, it can be concluded that the chains with higher DODT contents may form macrocycles, like in the case of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers.
The DSC curves of the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymers show only one glass transition in the -100–+200 °C temperature range (Figure 7). However, in contrast to the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers, the glass transition temperatures (Tg) of the HDODA containing copolymers increase with the increasing DODT content, that is, decreases with the increasing HDODA content (Figure 8). This is due to the hexamethylene segments of the HDODA monomeric units, which soften the macromolecules. This finding can be utilized to design such copolymers with predetermined Tg in a 15 °C range.

3.3. P(DODT-co-PEGDA) Copolymers by Sequential Monomer Addition

The effect of sequential monomer and oxidant addition on the formation of P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers were also tested. In the first experiment, after the preparation of a copolymer with 50:50 (mol%) DODT/PEGDA content in the feed, a sample was withdrawn, and a second addition of a monomer mixture containing also the same DODT/PEGDA ratio, followed by the addition of equal molar amount of H2O2 solution was performed. Both the 1H NMR spectra and the GPC chromatograms clearly show that neither the DODT content in the copolymers, nor the Mn and dispersity change considerably in such a sequential addition of DODT-PEGDA mixtures with stoichiometric ratio (Figure 9, Table 4). In addition, the yield of the second addition of the monomers is practically the same as in the first reaction sequence as shown in Table 4. These findings prove that the DODT and PEGDA, added in the second step, form mainly new copolymer chains, and only minor extension and/or coupling of the acrylate-telechelic copolymers, obtained in the first step, take place. After the third addition of the same monomer mixture, the occurrence of these phenomena is indicated as well.
However, when the sequentially added monomer is only DODT, a considerable shift occurs in the gel permeation chromatograms (Figure 10) indicating polymer chain extension, i.e., coupling of the previously formed acrylate-telechelic copolymers by the thiolates, formed by the thiol-base reaction, occurs due to the absence of monomeric acrylate groups. This is also confirmed by the PEGDA content in the copolymer, which is lower than before the sequential DODT addition (Table 3), on the one hand. On the other hand, neither the acrylic peaks nor the signals for free -SH groups appear in the 1H NMR spectrum of the copolymer formed after the subsequent charge of DODT and the oxidant. This indicates the formation of macrocyclic polymers as reported for PDODT homopolymers [32,33,34,35,36,37]. After the second charge of DODT and oxidant, the GPC chromatograph does not shift considerably to the higher molecular weights indicating that the acrylate endgroups are consumed in chain coupling during the previous DODT addition (sample s2-3). However, the DODT content is higher than before the second reagent addition, which is due to the polymerization of DODT also in this part of the experiment. The GPC curve and the somewhat decreased Mn of the copolymer formed after the second DODT and oxidant addition indicate the formation of some lower molecular weight polymers (Figure 10, Table 4), which should be PDODT homooligomers.

3.4. Targeted Degradation of Copolymers by Reductive Scission and Hydrolysis with a Strong Base

As well-known, the disulfides (-S-S-) can undergo reductive scission in the presence of thiols. Therefore, reductive chain breaking experiments were performed to investigate the redox sensitivity of the obtained copolymers. The PEGDA and HDODA-containing copolymers with 90 mol% DODT content in feed (c1-90 and c2-90 samples, respectively) were reduced by 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME). Figure 11 and Figure 12 show that the GPC curves are shifted to the lower molecular weight in the case of both copolymers, proving the presence of the disulfide linkages in these copolymers, on the one hand. On the other hand, these results indicate the ability of these DODT-diacrylate copolymers for reductive decomposition.
By treating the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer, obtained in the scale-up process, with dithiothreitol (DTT), a biochemically relevant thiol, the GPC curve of the copolymer is shifted to lower molecular weight indicating the presence and thus the reductive scission of the disulfide linkages in this copolymer. Additional treatment of the reductively degraded copolymer by sodium hydroxide solution on the basis of results by Junkers et al. [45] for degrading poly(β-thioester)s leads to further degradation as shown by the additional shift of the GPC chromatogram to the lower molecular weight region. This indicates that targeted treatment of the DODT-diacrylate copolymers, formed by simultaneous oxidative disulfide formation and thiol-ene Michael addition, by thiols and strong basis enables highly efficient predetermined degradation of these novel polymers.
Figure 13. The GPC chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer obtained with 1:1 DODT/PEGDA ratio before (black), and after reduction with dithiothreitol (DTT) (red) followed by treatment with NaOH solution (blue).
Figure 13. The GPC chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer obtained with 1:1 DODT/PEGDA ratio before (black), and after reduction with dithiothreitol (DTT) (red) followed by treatment with NaOH solution (blue).
Preprints 227059 g013

4. Conclusions

Simultaneous oxidative disulfide formation by thiol-thiol coupling, using H2O2 as oxidant, and thiol-ene Michael addition click reaction between a dithiol (DODT) and two diacrylates (PEGDA and HDODA) in the presence of a base (PMDETA), as common catalyst for both processes, was successfully achieved to obtain copolymers consisting of disulfide and β-thioester linkages, for the first time to the best of our knowledge. This way, redox-sensible P(DODT-co-PEGDA) and P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymers were synthesized with tunable copolymer contents under mild conditions, that is, in open air at room temperature and quite short reaction times of 10-15 mins. By using stoichiometric DODT/PEGDA ratios, acrylate-telechelic copolymers are obtained directly without the need of any additional chain end-functionalization process. These novel bifunctional, acrylate-ended copolymers can be utilized as novel macromolecular building elements for obtaining a broad range of sulfur-containing polymer architectures, such as polymers with other functionalities, block copolymers, networks and gels, etc. DSC experiments showed that both types of copolymers have low Tgs in the range of -53 °C and below, indicating elastomer-like behavior of the formed copolymers at room temperature. Treating the copolymers with thiols, such as 2-mercaptoethanol and dithiothreitol, led to scission of the disulfide units via thiol-disulfide exchange redox reaction. This indicates that these kinds of copolymers can be utilized in dynamic thiol-disulfide processes for various purposes, on the one hand. On the other hand, successful hydrolysis of the β-thioester linkages was carried out with NaOH solution, leading to low molecular weight product. These findings indicate that by combining these two degradation processes, that is, disulfide breaking by reduction and hydrolysis of the ester groups in these copolymers, enable to fully degrade these novel P(DODT-co-diacrylate) copolymers. In sum, the novel robust, rapid and mild process, reported in this study, by utilizing the same base as catalyst for the simultaneous oxidative disulfide formation and thiol-ene Michael addition click reaction results in new degradable acrylate-telechelic sulfur-containing copolymers, which can be utilized in a large variety of advanced applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Á.Sz. and B.I.; methodology, Á.Sz, A.A., Gy.Sz., D.F., A.P. and B.I.; investigation, Á.Sz, A.A., Gy.Sz., D.F., A.P. and B.I.; data curation, Á.Sz, A.A., Gy.Sz., D.F., A.P. and B.I.; writing—original draft preparation, Á.Sz., A.A. and B.I.; writing—review and editing, Á.Sz, A.A., Gy.Sz., D.F., A.P. and B.I.; visualization, Á.Sz, A.A., Gy.Sz., D.F., A.P. and B.I.; supervision, Á.Sz. and B.I; funding acquisition, B.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary (grant number K135946).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Additional data inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary (K135946). A.A. gratefully acknowledges the support by the Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship Program. Á.Sz. is grateful for the Bolyai János Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (BO/175/25/7).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Song, H.; Meng, J.; Jiang, X. Sulfur-containing sustainable polymers: synthetic pathways, degradation mechanisms, and multifunctional applications. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2025, 12, nwaf475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mutlu, H.; Ceper, E. B.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Dong, W.; Ozmen, M. M.; Théato, P. Sulfur chemistry in polymer and materials science. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, 1800650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yue, T. J.; Wang, L. Y.; Ren, W. M. The synthesis of degradable sulfur-containing polymers: precise control of structure and stereochemistry. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12, 6650–6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shi, X.; Zhuang, D. Thermosets Based on Covalent Bond Exchange: Mechanisms, Properties, and Reprocessing. Polymers 2026, 18, 1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Szabó, Á.; Szarka, Gy.; Trif, L.; Gyarmati, B.; Bereczki, L.; Iván, B.; Kovács, E. Poly(dithiophosphate)s, A New Class of Phosphorus- and Sulfur-Containing Functional Polymers by a Catalyst-Free Facile Reaction between Diols and Phosphorus Pentasulfide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, C. X.; Shi, M. Q.; Yan, X.; Wang, Q. W. Sustainable inverse vulcanized polymers: Design rules linking comonomer structure, network architecture, and functional performance. Sust. Mater. Technol. 2026, 48, e02044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grimm, A. P.; Plank, M.; Stihl, A.; Schmitt, C. W.; Voll, D.; Schacher, F. H.; Lahann, J.; Théato, P. Inverse Vulcanization of Activated Norbornenyl Esters—A Versatile Platform for Functional Sulfur Polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202411010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, R.; Nie, T.; Fang, Y.; Huang, H.; Wu, J. Poly(disulfide)s: from synthesis to drug delivery. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jin, S.; Oh, D. X.; Park, J. Dynamic Disulfide Chemistry for Functional Polymers: Self-Healing, Vitrimer Behavior, and Biochemical/Electronic Applications. ChemSusChem 2026, 19, e202501023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, X.; Zhai, Y.; Yang, K.; Bai, J.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, Y. Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Self-Healing Transparent Polyimide Film Based on Dynamic Disulfide Bonds. Polymers 2024, 16, 3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, Q.; Feringa, B. L.; Qu, D. H.; Tian, H. Sustainable Design of Dynamic Poly(disulfide)s. Acc. Chem. Res. 2026, 59, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Keyser, S. P.; Fairbanks, B. D.; Bahns, T.; Bowman, C. N. Dithiolane-Ene Copolymerization: Enabling Tunable, Dynamic Dual-Cure Networks via Real Time UV-VIS/FTIR Kinetics and Compositional Analysis. Macromolecules 2025, 58, 8468–8478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dawson, F.; Irvine, G.; Kopec, M. Lipoic acid/ethyl lipoate as cleavable comonomers for synthesis of degradable polymer networks. Polym. Chem. 2025, 16, 2659–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Albanese, K. R.; Morris, P. T.; Read de Alaniz, J.; Bates, C. M.; Hawker, C. J. Controlled-radical polymerization of α-lipoic acid: a general route to degradable vinyl copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 22728–22734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Koelbl, C. B.; Obunadike, C.; Ham, W.; Mahmud, N.; Garcia, M.; Lizundia, E.; Worch, J. C. A Greener and More Scalable Synthesis of Biogenic Polydisulfides from Lipoic Acid. ChemSusChem 2025, 18, e202500194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Levkovsky, I. O.; Trachsel, L.; Murata, H.; Matyjaszewski, K. Versatile and controlled synthesis of degradable, water-soluble bottlebrush polymers with poly(disulfide) backbones derived from α-lipoic acid. ACS Macro Lett. 2025, 14, 207−213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Czuczola, M.; Hossain, M. S.; Shannon, D. P.; Morris, P. T.; Getty, P. T.; Bates, C. M.; Read de Alaniz, J.; Hawker, C. J. Telechelic Dithiol Copolymers as Tunable Building Blocks for Synthesizing Multiblock Materials. J. Polym. Sci. 2025, 63, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kristensen, M. M.; Lovschall, K. B.; Zelikin, A. N. Mechanisms of Degradation for Polydisulfides: Main Chain Scission, Self-Immolation, or Chain Transfer Depolymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2023, 12, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pieta, M.; Purohit, V. B.; Pietrasik, J.; Plummer, C. M. Disulfide-containing monomers in chain-growth polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2023, 14, 7–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bera, S.; Ghosh, S. Alternating vs. random amphiphilic polydisulfides: aggregation, enzyme activity inhibition and redox-responsive guest release. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 17886–17892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Guggari, S.; Magliozzi, F.; Malburet, S.; Graillot, A.; Destarac, M.; Guerre, M. Closed-loop recycling of bio-based disulfide vitrimer via a solvent- and waste-free strategy. Green Chem. 2025, 27, 6392–6398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Behrendt, F. N.; Schlaad, H. Entropy-Driven Ring-Opening Disulfide Metathesis Polymerization for the Synthesis of Functional Poly(disulfide)s. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 39, 1700735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gharakhloo, M.; Khodami, S.; Zhang, K.; Jagleniec, D.; Dagdelen, S.; Nosrati, H.; Romanqski, J.; Hoogenboom, R.; Karbarz, M. Multifunctional dynamic hydrogels crosslinked with boronic ester and disulfide bonds reinforced with oxidized cellulose nanofibers for self-healing, motion sensing, and controlled drug release. Eur. Polym. J. 2026, 246, 114574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X. Disulfide-Crosslinked Polyurethane-Modified Asphalt: Balancing Fatigue Resistance and Healing Through Dynamic Covalent Networks. Polymers 2026, 18, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, S.; Chen, H.; Kong, J. Disulfide bonds-containing amphiphilic conetworks with tunable reductive-cleavage. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 36568–36575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Basak, D.; Kumar, R.; Ghosh, S. Telechelic Poly(disulfide)s and Related Block Copolymer. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2014, 35, 1340–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Witt, D. Recent developments in disulfide bond formation. Synthesis 2008, 2491–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nguyen, N. K. H.; Thi, M. L. N.; Song, D. A. N.; Dang, H. H.; Nguyen, L. T.; Truong, T. T.; Nguyen, L. T. T. Synthesis of a novel polysulfide via the reaction of a thiol compound and oxidant towards polymer self-healing application. Sci. Tech. Dev. J. 2022, 25, 2515–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goethals, E. J.; Sillis, C. Oxidation of dithiols to polydisulfides by means of dimethylsulfoxide. Makromol. Chem. 1968, 119, 249−251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Szilágyi, B. A.; Gyarmati, B.; L. Kiss, E.; Budai-Szűcs, M.; Misra, A.; Csányi, E.; László, K.; Szilágyi, A. In situ gelation of thiolated poly(aspartic acid) derivatives through oxidant-free disulfide formation for ophthalmic drug delivery. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2023, 225, 113254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Nagy, P.; Dóka, É.; Domán, A.; Paul, B. D.; Balla, J.; Murphy, M. P.; Winterbourn, C.; Radi, R.; Snyder, S. H.; Ignarro, L. J.; Sies, H. Multifaceted roles for persulfide species in redox chemical biology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2026, 22, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rosenthal-Kim, E. Q.; Puskas, J. E. Green Polymer Chemistry: Living oxidative polymerization of dithiols. Pure Appl. Chem. 2012, 84, 2121–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rosenthal, E. Q.; Puskas, J. E.; Wesdemiotis, C. Green polymer chemistry: living dithiol polymerization via cyclic intermediates. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rosenthal-Kim, E. Q.; Puskas, J. E. Green polymer chemistry: investigating the mechanism of radical ring-opening redox polymerization (R3P) of 3,6-Dioxa-1,8- octanedithiol (DODT). Molecules 2015, 20, 6504–6519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Molnar, K.; Kim, H.; Chen, D.; Helfer, C. A.; Kaszas, G.; McKenna, G. B.; Kornfield, J. A.; Yuan, C.; Puskas, J. E. PolyDODT: a macrocyclic elastomer with unusual properties. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Puskas, J. E.; Sen, S. Synthesis of Biodegradable Polyisobutylene Disulfides by Living Reversible Recombination Radical Polymerization (R3P): Macrocycles? Macromolecules 2017, 50, 2615–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Polyak, P.; Pillai, A. S.; Molnar, K.; Mijowska, E.; El Fray, M.; Puskas, J. E. Synthesis of biodegradable polydisulfides from renewable resources. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 411, 125677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ovc-Okene, D.; Gnanavel, A.; Szabó, Á.; Szarka, Gy.; Iván, B.; Kun, R. Investigation of Poly(3,6-dioxa-1,8-octane-dithiol)-Based Organosulfur Polymer as the Positive Electrode Material in Rechargeable Li-S Battery. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2023, 929, 117113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Posner, T. Beitraege zur Kenntniss der ungesaettigten Verbindungen. II. Ueber die Addition von Mercaptanen an ungesaettigte Kohlenwasserstoffen. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1905, 38, 646–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hoyle, C. E.; Bowman, C. N. Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1540–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Thiago O. Machado, T. O.; Sayer, C.; Araujo, P. H. H. Thiol-ene polymerisation: a promising technique to obtain novel biomaterials. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 86, 200–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, X.; Ren, N.; Xiao, Y.; Li, X.; Lang, M.; Zhu, X. Construction and Regulation on Thiol-Acrylate Networks through Binary Polymerization of Thiol-Ene Polymerization and Free Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 2024, 57, 9867–9876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schmidleitner, C.; Kriehuber, M. U.; Korotkov, R.; Schlögl, S.; Rossegger, E. Frontal polymerization of thiol–acrylate covalent adaptable networks. Polym. Chem. 2025, 16, 963–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vandenbergh, J.; Ramakers, G.; van Lokeren, L.; van Assche, G.; Junkers, T. Synthesis of degradable multi-segmented polymers via Michael-addition thiol–ene step-growth polymerization. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 81920–81932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vandenbergh, J.; Peeters, M.; Kretschmer, T.; Wagner, P.; Junkers, T. Cross-linked degradable poly(β-thioester) networks via amine-catalyzed thiol-ene click polymerization. Polymer 2014, 55, 3525–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zaquen, N.; Wenn, B.; Ranieri, K.; Vandenbergh, J.; Junkers, T. Facile design of degradable poly(β-thioester)s with tunable structure and functionality. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2014, 52, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vandenbergh, J.; Ranieri, K.; Junkers, T. Synthesis of (Bio)-Degradable Poly(β-thioester)s via Amine Catalyzed Thiol−Ene Click Polymerization. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2012, 213, 2611–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xuan, C.; Gao, S.; Wang, Y.; You, Q.; Liu, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, R.; Yang, K.; Cheng, S.; Liu, Z.; Guo, Q. In-situ generation of high performance thiol-conjugated solid polymer electrolytes via reliable thiol-acrylate click chemistry. J. Power Sources 2020, 456, 228024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, S. L.; Yu, F. C.; Guan, Y. H.; Liu, J. A.; Wu, X. H.; Yang, Z. X.; Qiao, Z. Y.; Wang, H. In Vivo Programmed Assembly of Polymer–Peptide Conjugates to Overcome Multistage Drug Delivery Barriers. ACS Nano 2026, 20, 6176–6185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. P. Shan, P.; Li, D.; Lu, W.; Yin., X.; Lian, X.; Lu, Y.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, M.; Du, K.; Ma, G.; Wen, X.; Xin, G.; Jiang, J.; Li, Z.; Li, Z. Photo-Degradable Functional Polyesters from an o-Nitrobenzyl Dithiol: Synthesis and Applications in Herbicide Delivery. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 5334–5341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dan, K.; Uvais, M.; Koner, S.; Ghosh, S. Synthesis of pH-Responsive Hyperbranched Polyesters by Thiol-Acrylate Michael Addition Reaction and Versatile Post-Polymerization Functionalization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2025, 46, 2500269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sanaa, R.; Portinha, D.; Medimagh, R.; Fleury, E. Synthesis of linear and crosslinked isosorbide-containing poly(β-thioether ester) via amine-catalyzed thiol-Michael addition. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 220, 113498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, S. S.; Pan, J. L.; Chen, X. L.; Xu, J.; Li, Z. L.; Cheng, C. Z. Synthesis of long-chain aliphatic poly(β-thioester)s via thiol-Michael polyaddition and their applications in noble metal recovery and information encryption. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 216, 113290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aerts, A.; Vovchenko, M.; Elahi, S.A.; Vinuelas, R.C.; De Maeseneer, T.; Purino, M.; Hoogenboom, R.; Van Oosterwyck, H.; Jonkers, I.; Cardinaels, R.; Smet, M. A Spontaneous In Situ Thiol-Ene Crosslinking Hydrogel with Thermo-Responsive Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2024, 16, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dey, S.; Mondal, A.; Aash, A.; Mukherjee, R.; Kolay, S.; Murmu, N.; Murmu, N.; Giri, B.; Molla, M. R. Poly-β-thioester-Based Cross-Linked Nanocarrier for Cancer Cell Selectivity over Normal Cells and Cellular Apoptosis by Triggered Release of Parthenolide, an Anticancer Drug. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024, 7, 1214–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sojdeh, S.; Panjipour, A.; Yaghmour, A.; Arabpour, Z.; Djalilian, A. R. Click chemistry-based hydrogels for tissue engineering. Gels 2025, 11, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Imamura, R.; Takasu, A. Biodegradability of poly(ester-thioether)s containing chiral biomass via a Michael-type thiol-ene click reaction. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 12001–12008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gao, H.; Sun, Y.; Wang, M.; Wu, B.; Han, G.; Jin, L.; Zhang, K.; Xia, Y. Self-healable and reprocessable acrylate-based elastomers with exchangeable disulfide crosslinks by thiol-ene click chemistry. Polymer 2021, 212, 123132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sun, Y.; Cao, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X. Synthesis of poly(ester disulfide)s from S8-involved step-growth addition polymerization at ambient temperature. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mondal, A.; Sarkar, S.; Molla, M. R. Thiol–Acrylate Michael Addition Strategy for the Templated Synthesis of Water-Soluble Poly(β-Thioester) Nanogel: Superior Encapsulation Stability and UV-Induced Photolysis Mediated On-Demand Guest Release. Nanoscale 2026, 18, 12018–12027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kohsaka, Y.; Hagiwara, K.; Ito, K. Polymerization of α-(halomethyl)acrylates through sequential nucleophilic attack of dithiols using a combination of addition–elimination and click reactions. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 976–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chan, J. W.; Hoyle, C. E.; Lowe, A. B.; Bowman, M. The Nucleophile-Initiated Thiol-Michael Click Reaction: The Effect of Organocatalyst, Thiol, and Ene. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 6381–6388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. The formation of P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers: (a) the two simultaneous reactions by thiol-ene addition and oxidative coupling of thiols, (b) the scheme of the copolymerization of DODT and PEGDA, and (c) the structure of the formed copolymer.
Scheme 1. The formation of P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers: (a) the two simultaneous reactions by thiol-ene addition and oxidative coupling of thiols, (b) the scheme of the copolymerization of DODT and PEGDA, and (c) the structure of the formed copolymer.
Preprints 227059 sch001
Figure 1. The 1H NMR spectrum of the polymer obtained in the experiment c1-50 (50 mol% DODT and 50 mol% of PEGDA in the feed).
Figure 1. The 1H NMR spectrum of the polymer obtained in the experiment c1-50 (50 mol% DODT and 50 mol% of PEGDA in the feed).
Preprints 227059 g001
Figure 2. The GPC chromatograms of the copolymers obtained in the c1 experimental series (see Table 1 for sample identification).
Figure 2. The GPC chromatograms of the copolymers obtained in the c1 experimental series (see Table 1 for sample identification).
Preprints 227059 g002
Scheme 2. The structure of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer macrocycles.
Scheme 2. The structure of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer macrocycles.
Preprints 227059 sch002
Figure 3. The differential scanning calorimetry curves of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers and the PDODT homopolymer (h-100) obtained in the c1 experimental series (see Table 1).
Figure 3. The differential scanning calorimetry curves of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers and the PDODT homopolymer (h-100) obtained in the c1 experimental series (see Table 1).
Preprints 227059 g003
Figure 4. The glass transition temperatures as a function of the DODT content of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers obtained in the c1 experimental series and the PDODT homopolymer (h-100) (see Table 1).
Figure 4. The glass transition temperatures as a function of the DODT content of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers obtained in the c1 experimental series and the PDODT homopolymer (h-100) (see Table 1).
Preprints 227059 g004
Figure 5. The 1H NMR spectrum of the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymer obtained in the experiment c2-50 (50 mol% of DODT and 50 mol% of HDODA in the feed).
Figure 5. The 1H NMR spectrum of the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymer obtained in the experiment c2-50 (50 mol% of DODT and 50 mol% of HDODA in the feed).
Preprints 227059 g005
Figure 6. The gel permeation chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymers obtained in the experimental series of c2 (see Table 3 for sample identification).
Figure 6. The gel permeation chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymers obtained in the experimental series of c2 (see Table 3 for sample identification).
Preprints 227059 g006
Figure 7. The differential scanning calorimetry curves of the copolymers obtained in the experimental series of c2 (HDODA comonomer) and PDODT homopolymer (h-100).
Figure 7. The differential scanning calorimetry curves of the copolymers obtained in the experimental series of c2 (HDODA comonomer) and PDODT homopolymer (h-100).
Preprints 227059 g007
Figure 8. The glass transition temperatures as the function of the DODT content of the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymers obtained in the experimental series of c2 (HDODA comonomer) and the PDODT homopolymer (h-100).
Figure 8. The glass transition temperatures as the function of the DODT content of the P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymers obtained in the experimental series of c2 (HDODA comonomer) and the PDODT homopolymer (h-100).
Preprints 227059 g008
Figure 9. The GPC chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers obtained in the s1 experimental series (simultaneous sequential addition of both DODT and PEGDA in stoichiometric ratio; the second number in the sample code stands for the number of the addition sequence).
Figure 9. The GPC chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers obtained in the s1 experimental series (simultaneous sequential addition of both DODT and PEGDA in stoichiometric ratio; the second number in the sample code stands for the number of the addition sequence).
Preprints 227059 g009
Figure 10. The GPC chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers obtained in the s2 experimental series (sequential addition of only DODT and H2O2 oxidant; the second number in the sample code stands for the number of the addition sequence).
Figure 10. The GPC chromatograms of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers obtained in the s2 experimental series (sequential addition of only DODT and H2O2 oxidant; the second number in the sample code stands for the number of the addition sequence).
Preprints 227059 g010
Figure 11. The GPC chromatograms of the c1-90 P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer sample before and after reduction with 2-mercaptoethanol.
Figure 11. The GPC chromatograms of the c1-90 P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer sample before and after reduction with 2-mercaptoethanol.
Preprints 227059 g011
Figure 12. The GPC chromatograms of the c2-90 P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymer before and after reduction with 2-mercaptoethanol.
Figure 12. The GPC chromatograms of the c2-90 P(DODT-co-HDODA) copolymer before and after reduction with 2-mercaptoethanol.
Preprints 227059 g012
Table 1. The DODT content in the feed and the resulting P(DODT-co-PEGDA)s obtained by copolymerization of DODT with PEGDA, the yield, the number average molecular weights (Mn), the peak molecular weights at the maxima of the GPC curves (Mpeak) and dispersity (Đ) of the polymers (in the sample codes “1” means the experimental series number, while the second number stands for the DODT content in the feed).
Table 1. The DODT content in the feed and the resulting P(DODT-co-PEGDA)s obtained by copolymerization of DODT with PEGDA, the yield, the number average molecular weights (Mn), the peak molecular weights at the maxima of the GPC curves (Mpeak) and dispersity (Đ) of the polymers (in the sample codes “1” means the experimental series number, while the second number stands for the DODT content in the feed).
Sample DODT
in the feed
(mol%)
DODT
in the copolymera
(mol%)
yield
(%)
Mna
by 1H NMR
(kg/mol)
Mnb (kg/mol) Mpeakb
(kg/mol)
Đb
c1-50 50 58 40 4.5 6.0 7.0 1.3
c1-60 60 65 63 10.9 9.3 12.0 1.6
c1-70 70 74 67 n.d.c 17.9 31.0 2.0
c1-80 80 82 72 n.d.c 27.8 44.9 2.0
c1-90 90 91 72 n.d.c 49.2 78.5 2.3
h-100 100 100 59 n.d.c 23.9 39.1 2.0
a on the basis of the 1H NMR spectra. b on the basis of the GPC measurements. c not determined due to the absence of the olefinic proton’s signals.
Table 2. The solubility of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers in various solvents.
Table 2. The solubility of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers in various solvents.
Solvent Solubility of P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymer
Water insoluble
Methanol insoluble
Ethanol insoluble
Toluene soluble
Tetrahydrofuran soluble
Methyl ethyl ketone soluble
Acetonitrile soluble
Chloroform soluble
Dichloromethane soluble
Dimethylformamide soluble
n-Hexane insoluble
Diethyl ether insoluble
Table 3. The DODT content in the feed and the resulting P(DODT-co-HDODA)s obtained by copolymerization of DODT with HDODA, the yield, the number average molecular weights (Mn), the peak molecular weights at the maxima of the GPC curves (Mpeak) and dispersity (Đ) of the polymers (in the sample codes “2” means the experimental series number, while the second number stands for the DODT content in the feed).
Table 3. The DODT content in the feed and the resulting P(DODT-co-HDODA)s obtained by copolymerization of DODT with HDODA, the yield, the number average molecular weights (Mn), the peak molecular weights at the maxima of the GPC curves (Mpeak) and dispersity (Đ) of the polymers (in the sample codes “2” means the experimental series number, while the second number stands for the DODT content in the feed).
Sample DODT
in the feed
(mol%)
DODT
in the copolymera (mol%)
yield
(%)
Mna
by 1H NMR (kg/mol)
Mnb (kg/mol) Mpeakb
(kg/mol)
Đb
c2-50 50 61 31 2.4 3.4 4.5 1.4
c2-60 60 66 54 3.8 4.7 6.1 1.5
c2-70 70 73 60 5.7 6.2 8.5 1.6
c2-80 80 80 69 14.6 13.2 25.1 1.8
c2-90 90 88 67 n.d.c 38.4 57.0 2.0
h-100 100 100 59 n.d.c 23.9 39.1 2.0
a on the basis of the 1H NMR spectra. b on the basis of the GPC measurements. c not determined due to the absence of the olefinic proton’s signals.
Table 4. The compositions, the yield, the number average molecular weights (Mn) and the dispersity (Đ) of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers formed in the sequential monomer addition experiments (s1 series: simultaneous sequential addition of both DODT and PEGDA in stoichiometric ratio; s2 series: sequential addition of only DODT and H2O2 oxidant; the second number in the sample code stands for the number of the addition sequence).
Table 4. The compositions, the yield, the number average molecular weights (Mn) and the dispersity (Đ) of the P(DODT-co-PEGDA) copolymers formed in the sequential monomer addition experiments (s1 series: simultaneous sequential addition of both DODT and PEGDA in stoichiometric ratio; s2 series: sequential addition of only DODT and H2O2 oxidant; the second number in the sample code stands for the number of the addition sequence).
Sample DODT
in the feed
(mol%)
DODT
in the copolymera
(mol%)
yield
(%)
Mna
by 1H NMR
(kg/mol)
Mnb
(kg/mol)
Đb
s1-1 50 57 48 5.2 6.9 1.3
s1-2 50 58 45 6.0 7.6 1.4
s1-3 50 58 45 5.9 7.9 1.4
s2-1 50 58 42 5.1 6.6 1.3
s2-2 75 67 57 n.d.c 36.5 2.1
s2-3 87.5 78 26 n.d.c 30.4 1.9
a on the basis of the 1H NMR spectra. b on the basis of the GPC measurements. c not determined due to the absence of the olefinic proton’s signals.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.