Submitted:
04 August 2026
Posted:
05 August 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Overview of Electrical Machines and Common Fault Mechanisms
2.1. Classification of Electrical Machines
2.2. Common Fault Mechanisms in Electrical Machines
2.3. Common Fault Mechanisms in Electrical Machines
2.4. Condition Monitoring Data Sources and Fault Indicators
2.5. Maintenance Strategies for Electrical Machines
3. Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Electrical Machine Health Management
3.1. Machine Learning Techniques
| Algorithm | Application | Strength |
| Support Vector Machine (SVM) |
Fault classification and diagnosis | High accuracy with small datasets |
| Artificial Neural Network (ANN) |
Condition monitoring and RUL prediction | Captures nonlinear relationships |
| Decision Tree (DT) | Fault identification | Easy to interpret and implement |
| Random Forest (RF) | Fault diagnosis and anomaly detection |
Robust and accurate |
| k-Nearest Neighbour (kNN) |
Bearing and rotor fault classification |
Simple and effective |
| Naïve Bayes (NB) | Transformer fault diagnosis | Fast and computationally efficient |
| Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) | Predictive maintenance and fault classification | High predictive performance |
3.2. Deep Learning Techniques
3.3. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approaches

4. Applications for Artificial Intelligence in Electrical Machine Health Management
5. Challenges and Future Research Directions
6. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
| Abbreviation | Definition |
| ACO | Ant Colony Optimization |
| AE | Autoencoder |
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| ANN | Artificial Neural Network |
| BLDC | Brushless Direct-Current |
| CBM | Condition-Based Maintenance |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
| DBN | Deep Belief Network |
| DGA | Dissolved Gas Analysis |
| DL | Deep Learning |
| DNN | Deep Neural Network |
| DQN | Deep Q-Network |
| DRL | Deep Reinforcement Learning |
| DT | Decision Tree |
| EMD | Empirical Mode Decomposition |
| FFT | Fast Fourier Transform |
| GA | Genetic Algorithm |
| GMM | Gaussian Mixture Model |
| GRU | Gated Recurrent Unit |
| GWO | Grey Wolf Optimizer |
| HHT | Hilbert–Huang Transform |
| IIoT | Industrial Internet of Things |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| k-NN | k-Nearest Neighbour |
| LIME | Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations |
| LSTM | Long Short-Term Memory |
| MCSA | Motor Current Signature Analysis |
| ML | Machine Learning |
| NB | Naïve Bayes |
| PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
| PdM | Predictive Maintenance |
| PMSM | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| PSO | Particle Swarm Optimization |
| RF | Random Forest |
| RL | Reinforcement Learning |
| RNN | Recurrent Neural Network |
| ROC | Receiver Operating Characteristic |
| RUL | Remaining Useful Life |
| SARSA | State–Action–Reward–State–Action |
| SHAP | Shapley Additive Explanations |
| SSL | Semi-Supervised Learning |
| SRM | Switched Reluctance Motor |
| STFT | Short-Time Fourier Transform |
| SVM | Support Vector Machine |
| VAE | Variational Autoencoder |
| VMD | Variational Mode Decomposition |
| WOA | Whale Optimization Algorithm |
| WT | Wavelet Transform |
| XAI | Explainable Artificial Intelligence |
| XGBoost | Extreme Gradient Boosting |
References
- Akbar, S.; Vaimann, T.; Asad, B.; Kallaste, A.; Sardar, M. U.; Kudelina, K. State-of-the-art techniques for fault diagnosis in electrical machines: Advancements and future directions. Energies 2023, vol. 16(no. 18), 6345. [Google Scholar]
- Abid, S. M. A.; Khan, M. T.; Iqbal, J. A review on fault detection and diagnosis techniques: Basics and beyond. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2021, vol. 54, 3639–3664. [Google Scholar]
- Bazan, G. H.; Goedtel, A.; Duque-Perez, O.; Morinigo-Sotelo, D. Multi-fault diagnosis in three-phase induction motors using data optimization and machine learning techniques. Electronics 2021, vol. 10(no. 12), 1462. [Google Scholar]
- Gawde, S.; Patil, S.; Kumar, S.; Kamat, P.; Kotecha, K.; Abraham, A. Multi-fault diagnosis of industrial rotating machines using data-driven approach: A review of two decades of research. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, vol. 123, 106139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tama, B. A.; Vania, M.; Lee, S.; Lim, S. Recent advances in the application of deep learning for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery using vibration signals. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023, vol. 56, 4667–4709. [Google Scholar]
- Drakaki, M.; Karnavas, Y. L.; Tziafettas, I. A.; Linardos, V.; Tzionas, P. Machine learning and deep learning based methods toward Industry 4.0 predictive maintenance in induction motors: State of the art survey. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2022, vol. 15(no. 1), 31–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanam, R.; Hussain, M.; Hill, R.; Allen, P. A comprehensive review of convolutional neural networks for defect detection in industrial applications. IEEE Access 2024, vol. 12, 94250–94295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Huang, R.; Wang, F.; Li, W. Enhancing reliability through interpretability: A comprehensive survey of interpretable intelligent fault diagnosis in rotating machinery. IEEE Access 2024, vol. 12, 103348–103379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toma, R. N.; Prosvirin, A. E.; Kim, J.-M. Bearing fault diagnosis of induction motors using a genetic algorithm and machine learning classifiers. Sensors 2020, vol. 20(no. 7), 1884. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, J.; Bao, S.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, P.; Steyskal, F.; Dustdar, S. Rotating machinery fault diagnosis based on feature extraction via an unsupervised graph neural network. Appl. Intell. 2023, vol. 53, 21211–21226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrera-Llanga, K.; Burriel-Valencia, J.; Sapena-Bañó, Á.; Martínez-Román, J. A comparative analysis of deep learning convolutional neural network architectures for fault diagnosis of broken rotor bars in induction motors. Sensors 2023, vol. 23(no. 18), 8196. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.; Liang, K.; Peng, T.; Wang, Y. Multi-condition PMSM fault diagnosis based on convolutional neural network phase tracker. Symmetry 2022, vol. 14(no. 2), 295. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, B.; Xia, H.; Lv, X.; Annor-Nyarko, M.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J. An intelligent fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery based on data fusion and deep residual neural network. Appl. Intell. 2022, vol. 52, 3051–3065. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, S.; Yang, T.; Hua, H.; Cao, J. Coupling fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox based on multitask parallel convolutional neural networks with overall information. Renew. Energy 2021, vol. 178, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, G.; Wei, Q.; Yang, Y. Bearing fault diagnosis with parallel CNN and LSTM. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2024, vol. 21(no. 2), 2385–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, L.; Teoh, S. S.; Ibrahim, H. A deep learning approach for electric motor fault diagnosis based on modified InceptionV3. Sci. Rep. 2024, vol. 14, 12344. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Q.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Lang, G.; Zeng, L. Bearing fault diagnosis based on efficient cross space multiscale CNN transformer parallelism. Sci. Rep. vol. 15, 12344, 2025.
- Sabir, R.; Rosato, D.; Hartmann, S.; Guehmann, C. LSTM based bearing fault diagnosis of electrical machines using motor current signal. Proc. IEEE ICMLA, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 613–618. [Google Scholar]
- Tavares, T. M.; Santos, L. D.; Quiles, M. G.; Giesbrecht, M. A hybrid CNN-LSTM based network for rolling bearing fault detection. Proc. IECON, Chicago, IL, USA, 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Tang, X.; Zhao, S.; Lu, X. A novel fault diagnosis method based on CNN and LSTM and its application in fault diagnosis for complex systems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2022, vol. 55, 1289–1315. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, G.; Shu, L. Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on transfer learning and convolutional autoencoder with small-scale data. Renew. Energy 2021, vol. 171, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brito, L. C.; Susto, G. A.; Brito, J. N.; Duarte, M. A. V. Fault diagnosis using eXplainable AI: A transfer learning-based approach for rotating machinery exploiting augmented synthetic data. Expert Syst. With Appl. 2023, vol. 232, 120860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Z.; Xie, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Domain adversarial transfer learning bearing fault diagnosis model incorporating structural adjustment modules. Sensors vol. 25(no. 6), 1851, 2025.
- Zhou, K.; Yang, C.; Liu, J.; Xu, Q. Deep graph feature learning-based diagnosis approach for rotating machinery using multi-sensor data. J. Intell. Manuf. 2023, vol. 34, 1965–1974. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Meng, D.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, K. Fault diagnosis of PMSMs based on image features of multi-sensor fusion. Sensors 2023, vol. 23(no. 21), 8592. [Google Scholar]
- Attallah; Ibrahim, R. A.; Zakzouk, N. E. Fault diagnosis for induction generator-based wind turbine using ensemble deep learning techniques. Energy Rep. 2022, vol. 8, 12787–12798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, M. A.; Hassan, M. A. M.; Albalawi, F.; Ghoneim, S. S. M.; Ali, Z. M.; Dardeer, M. Diagnostic modelling for induction motor faults via ANFIS algorithm and DWT-based feature extraction. Appl. Sci. 2021, vol. 11(no. 19), 9115. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, J.; Huang, L.; Xiao, D.; Li, X. GMPSO-VMD algorithm and its application to rolling bearing fault feature extraction. Sensors 2020, vol. 20(no. 7), 1946. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, C.-Y.; Maceren, E. D. C. Induction motor bearing fault classification using deep neural network with particle swarm optimization-extreme gradient boosting. IET Electr. Power Appl. 2024, vol. 18(no. 4), 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djaballah, S.; Saidi, L.; Meftah, K.; Hechifa, A.; Bajaj, M.; Zaitsev, I. A hybrid LSTM random forest model with grey wolf optimization for enhanced detection of multiple bearing faults. Sci. Rep. 2024, vol. 14, 23997. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, M.-C.; Lee, J.-H.; Wang, D.-H.; Lee, I.-S. Induction motor fault diagnosis using support vector machine, neural networks, and boosting methods. Sensors 2023, vol. 23(no. 5), 2585. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Z.; Shi, X.; Zou, H.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, J. Fault diagnosis of wind turbine generators based on stacking integration algorithm and adaptive threshold. Sensors 2023, vol. 23(no. 14), 6198. [Google Scholar]
- Inyang, U. I.; Petrunin, I.; Jennions, I. Diagnosis of multiple faults in rotating machinery using ensemble learning. Sensors 2023, vol. 23(no. 3), 1005. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, U.; Ramzan, U.; Ali, W.; Al-Jaafari, K. A. An improved fault diagnosis strategy for induction motors using weighted probability ensemble deep learning. IEEE Access 2025, vol. 13, 106958–106973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Wang, H.; Zhang, F. Self-supervised learning for machinery fault diagnosis under strong background noise and limited epochs. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2025, vol. 36(no. 2), 026135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Xiao, H.; Ye, Z.; Luo, N.; Zhou, M. Research and prospects of digital twin-based fault diagnosis of electric machines. Sensors vol. 25(no. 9), 2625, 2025.
- Yang, R.; Zhong, M. Machine Learning-Based Fault Diagnosis for Industrial Engineering Systems, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Wilhelm, Y.; Reimann, P.; Gauchel, W.; Mitschang, B. Overview on hybrid approaches to fault detection and diagnosis: Combining data-driven, physics-based and knowledge-based models. Procedia CIRP 2021, vol. 99, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barai, V.; Ramteke, S. M.; Dhanalkotwar, V.; Nagmote, Y.; Shende, S.; Deshmukh, D. Bearing fault diagnosis using signal processing and machine learning techniques: A review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, vol. 1259, 012034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Z.; Wang, H.; Wu, Q.; Li, Y.; Diao, L. Demagnetization characteristics diagnosis of permanent magnet synchronous motors. Proc. EITRT, Singapore, 2023; pp. 331–338. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, C.; Peng, L.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, T. Analytical modeling and analysis of permanent-magnet motor with demagnetization fault. Sensors 2022, vol. 22(no. 23), 9440. [Google Scholar]
- AlShorman; Alkahatni, F.; Masadeh, M.; Irfan, M.; Glowacz, A.; Althobiani, F.; Kozik, J.; Glowacz, W. Sounds and acoustic emission-based early fault diagnosis of induction motor: A review study. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2021, vol. 13(no. 2). [Google Scholar]
- Shi, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xia, Z.; Li, B.; Gu, G.; Shi, T. Application of Teager–Kaiser energy operator in the early fault diagnosis of rolling bearings. Sensors 2022, vol. 22(no. 17), 6673. [Google Scholar]
- Jaros, R.; Byrtus, R.; Dohnal, J.; Danys, L.; Baros, J.; Koziorek, J.; Zmij, P.; Martinek, R. Advanced signal processing methods for condition monitoring. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2023, vol. 30, 1553–1577. [Google Scholar]
- Badihi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, B.; Pillay, P.; Rakheja, S. A comprehensive review on signal-based and model-based condition monitoring of wind turbines: Fault diagnosis and lifetime prognosis. Proc. IEEE 2022, vol. 110(no. 6), 754–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, U.; Jiao, W.; Sun, J.; Sohaib, M.; Jiang, Y.; Shahzadi, M.; Khan, M. I. Efficient fault detection of rotor minor inter-turn short circuit in induction machines using wavelet transform and empirical mode decomposition. Sensors 2023, vol. 23(no. 16), 7109. [Google Scholar]
- Aguayo-Tapia, S.; Ávalos-Almazán, G.; Rangel-Magdaleno, J.; Paternina, M. R. A. Broken rotor bar detection in induction motors using digital Taylor-Fourier transform. Proc. IEEE ROPEC, Ixtapa, Mexico, 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Ramu, S. K.; Irudayaraj, G. C. R.; Devarajan, G.; Indragandhi, V.; Subramaniyaswamy, V.; Alaric, J. Sam. Diagnosis of broken bars in V/F control induction motor drive using wavelets and EEV estimation for electric vehicle applications. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2022, vol. 2022, 9474640. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y.; Wang, X.; Han, S.; Lin, J.; Han, Q. Fault diagnosis for abnormal wear of rolling element bearing fusing oil debris monitoring. Sensors 2023, vol. 23(no. 7), 3402. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Z.; Wang, M.; Ouyang, T.; Che, F. A wind turbine bearing fault diagnosis method based on fused depth features in time–frequency domain. Energy Rep. 2022, vol. 8, 12727–12739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaqub, R.; Ali, H.; Wahab, M. H. B. A. Electrical motor fault detection system using AI’s random forest classifier technique. Proc. IEEE IC_ASET, Hammamet, Tunisia, 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, B.; Mao, Y.; Chen, X.; Chai, Y.; Yang, Z. Self-supervised learning advance fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. In Neural Computing for Advanced Applications; Guangzhou, China, 2021; pp. 319–332. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, R.; Zhang, L. A review of failure modes, condition monitoring and fault diagnosis methods for large-scale wind turbine bearings. Measurement 2020, vol. 149, 107002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaerke, T. R.; Hernandez, D. C. Root cause analysis of motor stator failures. Proc. IEEE PPIC, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2013; pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- Trnka, P.; Trnkova, M. Asset management of large electric machines through monitoring of electric insulation. Acta Polytech. Hung. 2022, vol. 19(no. 8), 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leffler, J.; Trnka, P. Failures of electrical machines—Review. Proc. IYCE, Eger, Hungary, 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Gracheva, E. I.; Petrova, R. M.; Sinyukova, T.; Valtchev, S.; Miceli, R.; Caruso, M. Reliability and overload capacity of power transformers. Proc. ICCEP, Terrasini, Italy, 2023; pp. 684–689. [Google Scholar]
- Yasid, N.; Alawady, A.; Yousof, M.; Talib, M.; Kamarudin, M. The effect of short circuit fault in three-phase core-typed transformer. Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst. 2020, vol. 11(no. 1), 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- M. H. A. Soliman, Industrial Power Transformers: Selection, Installation, Advanced Maintenance and Reliability; Mohammed Hamed Ahmed Soliman: Cairo, Egypt, 2024.
- Babak, V.; Babak, S.; Zaporozhets, A. “Tasks and main methods of statistical diagnostics of electric power equipment,” in Statistical Diagnostics of Electric Power Equipment; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2024; pp. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
- Bagri; Tahiry, K.; Hraiba, A.; Touil, A.; Mousrij, A. Vibration signal analysis for intelligent rotating machinery diagnosis and prognosis: A comprehensive systematic literature review. Vibration 2024, vol. 7(no. 4), 1013–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Xuan, J.; Shi, T. Domain reinforcement feature adaptation methodology with correlation alignment for compound fault diagnosis of rolling bearing. Expert Syst. With Appl. 2025, vol. 262, 125594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Xuan, J.; Shi, T. An autonomous recognition framework based on reinforced adversarial open set algorithm for compound fault of mechanical equipment. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2024, vol. 219, 111596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Xuan, J.; Shi, T.; Li, Y. F. Multi-label domain adversarial reinforcement learning for unsupervised compound fault recognition. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2025, vol. 254, 110638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazibuko, N.; Akindeji, K.; Moloi, K. Performance comparison of machine learning based fault detection scheme for a compensated transmission line. Proc. IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2024; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Wang, M.; Zhang, H. Machine learning-based fault prediction and diagnosis of brushless motors. Eng. Adv. 2024, vol. 4, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arabaci, H.; Mohamed, M. A. A knowledge-based diagnosis algorithm for broken rotor bar fault classification using FFT, principal component analysis and support vector machines. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Inform. 2020, vol. 8(no. 1), 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Haddad, L. A.; Jaber, A. A.; Hamzah, M. N.; Fayad, M. A. Vibration-current data fusion and gradient boosting classifier for enhanced stator fault diagnosis in three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors. Electr. Eng. 2024, vol. 106, 3253–3268. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, L.; Rong, X.; Wang, H.; Yu, S.; Zhang, Y. Method for identifying stator and rotor faults of induction motors based on machine vision. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, vol. 2021, 6658648. [Google Scholar]
- Giacotto, A. C. P.; Mesquita; Marques, H. C.; Martinetti, A. Holistic and scalable smart optimization framework for prescriptive maintenance. Proc. ICAS, Florence, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Dweiri, F. A.; Aydin, R.; Alnaqbi, A.; Almazrouei, S. M. A review on the advancements and challenges of artificial intelligence based models for predictive maintenance of water injection pumps in the oil and gas industry. SN Appl. Sci. 2023, vol. 5, 391. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Q.; Zhao, N.; Li, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Sui, K.; Pei, D. A survey on intelligent management of alerts and incidents in IT services. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2024, vol. 224, 103842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taye, M. Understanding of machine learning with deep learning: Architectures, workflow, applications and future directions. Computers 2023, vol. 12(no. 5), 91. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.; Liu, F.; Yang, W.; Peng, S.; Zhou, J. A survey of convolutional neural networks: Analysis, applications, and prospects. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2021, vol. 33(no. 12), 6999–7019. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.; Zhang, T.; Cui, G.; Pan, Y. Intelligent machine fault diagnosis using convolutional neural networks and transfer learning. IEEE Access 2022, vol. 10, 50959–50973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan; Sohail, A.; Zahoora, U.; Qureshi, A. S. A survey of the recent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2020, vol. 53, 5455–5516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patil, D.; Rane, N.; Desai, P.; Rane, J. “Machine learning and deep learning: Methods, techniques, applications, challenges, and future research opportunities,” in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Industry and Society; Deep Science Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 28–81. [Google Scholar]
- Tirthyani, D.; Kumar, S.; Vats, S. “Clustering and unsupervised learning,” in Recent Trends and Future Direction for Data Analytics; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 119–139. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, J.; Ma, G.; Zhang, G. Fuzzy machine learning: A comprehensive framework and systematic review. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2024, vol. 32(no. 7), 3861–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulesnane. “Evolutionary dynamic optimization and machine learning,” in Advanced Machine Learning with Evolutionary and Metaheuristic Techniques; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2024; pp. 67–85. [Google Scholar]
- Kiasari, R.; Ghaffari, M.; Aly, H. H. A comprehensive review of the current status of smart grid technologies for renewable energies integration and future trends: The role of machine learning and energy storage systems. Energies 2024, vol. 17(no. 16), 4128. [Google Scholar]
- Fida, K.; Abbasi, U.; Adnan, M.; Iqbal, S.; Mohamed, S. E. G. A comprehensive survey on load forecasting hybrid models: Navigating the futuristic demand response patterns through experts and intelligent systems. Results Eng. 2024, vol. 23, 102773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regulwar, G. B.; Mahalle, A.; Pawar, R.; Shamkuwar, S. K.; Kakde, P. R.; Tiwari, S. “Big data collection, filtering, and extraction of features,” in Big Data Analytics Techniques for Market Intelligence; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2024; pp. 136–158. [Google Scholar]
- Watson, S. J.; Xiang, B. J.; Yang, W.; Tavner, P. J.; Crabtree, C. J. Condition monitoring of the power output of wind turbine generators using wavelets. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2010, vol. 25(no. 3), 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Pan, J.; Li, Z.; Zi, Y.; Chen, X. Generator bearing fault diagnosis for wind turbine via empirical wavelet transform using measured vibration signals. Renew. Energy 2016, vol. 89, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talhaoui, H.; Menacer, A.; Kessal, A.; Tarek, A. Experimental diagnosis of broken rotor bars fault in induction machine based on Hilbert and discrete wavelet transforms. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, vol. 95, 1399–1408. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, S.; Han, T.; Tan, A. C. C.; Lin, T. R. Fault diagnosis system of induction motors based on multiscale entropy and support vector machine with mutual information algorithm. Shock Vib. 2016, vol. 2016, 5836717. [Google Scholar]
- Huo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Shu, L.; Gallimore, M. A new bearing fault diagnosis method based on fine-to-coarse multiscale permutation entropy, Laplacian score and SVM. IEEE Access 2019, vol. 7, 17050–17066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, N.; Irfan, M.; Ibrahim, R. Condition Monitoring and Faults Diagnosis of Induction Motors: Electrical Signature Analysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Thomson, W. T.; Culbert, I. Current Signature Analysis for Condition Monitoring of Cage Induction Motors: Industrial Application and Case Histories; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Merizalde, Y.; Hernández-Callejo, L.; Duque-Perez, O. State of the art and trends in the monitoring, detection and diagnosis of failures in electric induction motors. Energies 2017, vol. 10(no. 7), 1056. [Google Scholar]
- Miljković, D. Brief review of motor current signature analysis. HDKBR Info-CrSNDT J. 2015, vol. 15(no. 1), 15–26. [Google Scholar]
- Syahputra, R.; Purwanto, H.; Wiyagi, R. O.; Mustar, M. Y.; Soesanti, I. Analysis of induction motor performance using motor current signature analysis technique. J. Electr. Technol. UMY 2021, vol. 5(no. 1), 7–16. [Google Scholar]
- Fofana; Hadjadj, Y. Electrical-based diagnostic techniques for assessing insulation condition in aged transformers. Energies 2016, vol. 9(no. 9), 679. [Google Scholar]
- Metwally. Failures, monitoring and new trends of power transformers. IEEE Potentials 2011, vol. 30(no. 3), 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, T. K.; Purkait, P. Transformer Ageing: Monitoring and Estimation Techniques; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Haddad, G.; Sandborn, P. A.; Pecht, M. G. An options approach for decision support of systems with prognostic capabilities. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2012, vol. 61(no. 4), 872–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Dong, M.; Zuo, M. J. Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: A review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, vol. 50, 297–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arunraj, N.; Maiti, J. Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. Saf. Sci. 2010, vol. 48(no. 2), 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomson, W. T.; Fenger, M. Current signature analysis to detect induction motor faults. IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag. 2001, vol. 7(no. 4), 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schoen, R. R.; Habetler, T. G.; Kamran, F.; Bartfield, R. Motor bearing damage detection using stator current monitoring. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1995, vol. 31(no. 6), 1274–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tallam, R. M.; Lee, S. B.; Stone, G. C.; Kliman, G. B.; Yoo, J.; Habetler, T. G.; Harley, R. G. A survey of methods for detection of stator-related faults in induction machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2007, vol. 43(no. 4), 920–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrew, M. Fault diagnosis: Models, artificial intelligence, applications. Kybernetes 2005, vol. 34(no. 5), 742–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collacott, R. Mechanical Fault Diagnosis and Condition Monitoring; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Scheffer, C.; Girdhar, P. Practical Machinery Vibration Analysis and Predictive Maintenance; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Miljković, D. Review of machine condition monitoring based on vibration data. Proc. MIPRO, Opatija, Croatia, 2008; pp. 70–75. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.; Tu, L.; Liu, H.; et al. Fault analysis of wind turbines in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, vol. 55, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenin, N. C.; Padmanaban, S.; Bhaskar, M. S.; et al. Ceiling fan drives—past, present and future. IEEE Access 2021, vol. 9, 44888–44904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, D. A review of multiphase energy conversion in wind power generation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, vol. 147, 111172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scalcon, F. P.; Fang, G.; Volpato Filho, C. J.; et al. A review on switched reluctance generators in wind power applications: Fundamentals, control and future trends. IEEE Access, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Irgat, E.; Çinar, E.; Ünsal, A.; et al. An IoT-based monitoring system for induction motor faults utilizing deep learning models. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2022, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C. S.; Kao, I. H.; Perng, J. W. Fault diagnosis and fault frequency determination of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on deep learning. Sensors 2021, vol. 21(no. 11), 3608. [Google Scholar]
- You, Y. Multi-objective optimal design of permanent magnet synchronous motor for electric vehicle based on deep learning. Appl. Sci. 2020, vol. 10(no. 2), 482. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, X.; Wang, S.; Niu, S.; et al. A novel high-order-harmonic winding design method for vernier reluctance machine with DC coils across two stator teeth. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2021, vol. 69(no. 8), 7696–7707. [Google Scholar]
- Niu, S.; Sheng, T.; Zhao, X.; et al. Operation principle and torque component quantification of short-pitched flux-bidirectional-modulation machine. IEEE Access 2019, vol. 7, 136676–136685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang; Fu, W.; Niu, S.; et al. Comparative analysis of different permanent magnet arrangements in a novel flux modulated electric machine. IEEE Access 2021, vol. 9, 14437–14445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Niu, S. Flux-modulated permanent magnet machines: Challenges and opportunities. World Electr. Veh. J. 2021, vol. 12(no. 1), 13. [Google Scholar]
- Niu, S.; Wang, S.; Zhao, X. Overview of stator slot-opening permanent magnet machines. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, vol. 9(no. 1), 782–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlShorman; Irfan, M.; Saad, N.; et al. A review of artificial intelligence methods for condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings for induction motor. Shock Vib. 2020, vol. 2020, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, T. The review of electromagnetic field modeling methods for permanent-magnet linear motors. Energies 2022, vol. 15(no. 10), 3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omar, M.; Sayed, E.; Abdalmagid, M.; et al. Review of machine learning applications to the modeling and design optimization of switched reluctance motors. IEEE Access 2022, vol. 10, 130444–130468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; et al. Review of design and control optimization of axial flux PMSM in renewable-energy applications. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2023, vol. 36(no. 1), 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Lei, G.; Bramerdorfer, G.; et al. Machine learning for design optimization of electromagnetic devices: Recent developments and future directions. Appl. Sci. 2021, vol. 11(no. 4), 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, A. E. H.; Karci; Tavernini, D.; et al. Design approaches and control strategies for energy-efficient electric machines for electric vehicles—A review. IEEE Access 2020, vol. 8, 116900–116913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Klerk, L.; Saha, A. K. A comprehensive review of advanced traction motor control techniques suitable for electric vehicle applications. IEEE Access 2021, vol. 9, 125080–125108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gangsar, P.; Tiwari, R. Signal based condition monitoring techniques for fault detection and diagnosis of induction motors: A state-of-the-art review. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2020, vol. 144, 106908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H. S. H.; Chung; Lo, W. L.; Hui, S. Y.; Wu, A. K. M. Implementation of a decoupled optimization technique for design of switching regulators using genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2001, vol. 16(no. 6), 752–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Tan, D.; Liu, L. Particle swarm optimization algorithm: An overview. Soft Comput. 2018, vol. 22, 387–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Ding, Q.; Sun, J.-Q. Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2018, vol. 172, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, H.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Z.; et al. Real-time diagnosis of an in-wheel motor of an electric vehicle based on dynamic Bayesian networks. IEEE Access 2019, vol. 7, 114685–114699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.-Z.; Wang, H.-K.; Li, Y.-F.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z. Support vector machine based estimation of remaining useful life: Current research status and future trends. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2015, vol. 29(no. 1), 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan; Ghorbanian, V.; Lowther, D. Deep learning for magnetic field estimation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2019, vol. 55(no. 6), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, H.; Guo, L.; Tan, S.; Bai, X. Rolling bearing initial fault detection using long short-term memory recurrent network. IEEE Access 2019, vol. 7, 171559–171569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; Shen, H.; Zhao, J.; et al. Degradation state recognition of rolling bearing based on K-means and CNN algorithm. Shock Vib. 2019, vol. 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T. Z.; Xu, H.; Han, J. G.; Elbouchikhi, E.; Benbouzid, M. E. H. Cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter system fault diagnosis using a PCA and multiclass relevance vector machine approach. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, vol. 30(no. 12), 7006–7018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong; He, M.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Machine learning fault detection algorithm based on resampling. Proc. Chinese Automation Congress, 2019; pp. 3158–3163. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Xue, M.; et al. Application of deep learning in motor vibration and noise suppression based on negative magnetostrictive effect. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2023, vol. 18(no. 3), 1931–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Traue; Book, G.; Kirchgässner, W.; et al. Toward a reinforcement learning environment toolbox for intelligent electric motor control. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2020, vol. 33(no. 3), 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahmoudi; Kahourzade, S.; Abd Rahim, N.; Hew, W. P. Design, analysis, and prototyping of an axial-flux permanent magnet motor based on genetic algorithm and finite-element analysis. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2012, vol. 49(no. 4), 1479–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-H.; Kim, J.-W.; Song, J.-Y.; Kim, Y.-J.; Jung, S.-Y. A novel memetic algorithm using modified particle swarm optimization and mesh adaptive direct search for PMSM design. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2015, vol. 52(no. 3), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, G.; Wei, T.; Ding, X. Multi-objective optimal design of permanent magnet synchronous motor for high efficiency and high dynamic performance. IEEE Access 2018, vol. 6, 23568–23581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan; Mohammadi, M. H.; Ghorbanian, V.; et al. Efficiency map prediction of motor drives using deep learning. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2020, vol. 56(no. 3), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barmada, S.; Fontana, N.; Sani, L.; et al. Deep learning and reduced models for fast optimization in electromagnetics. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2020, vol. 56(no. 3), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asanuma; Doi, S.; Igarashi, H. Transfer learning through deep learning: Application to topology optimization of electric motor. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2020, vol. 56(no. 3), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parekh, V.; Flore, D.; Schöps, S. Deep learning-based prediction of key performance indicators for electrical machines. IEEE Access 2021, vol. 9, 21786–21797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S. H.; Chin, J. W.; Cha, K. S.; et al. Deep transfer learning-based sizing method of permanent magnet synchronous motors considering axial leakage flux. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2022, vol. 58(no. 9), 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, C. Midha; Lowther, D. Reinforcement learning for topology optimization of a synchronous reluctance motor. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2022, vol. 58(no. 9), 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Niu, S.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Physics-informed generative adversarial network-based modeling and simulation of linear electric machines. Appl. Sci. 2022, vol. 12(no. 20), 10426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almatheel, Y. A.; Abdelrahman, A. Speed control of DC motor using fuzzy logic controller. Proc. ICCCCEE 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, L.; Wang, S. Y.; Chien, S. C.; et al. Development of a self-tuning TSK-fuzzy speed control strategy for switched reluctance motor. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2011, vol. 27(no. 4), 2141–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, K.; Chhabra, A.; Chhillar, A.; et al. Fuzzy logic based controllers for speed control of BLDC motor. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2017, vol. 5(no. 6), 985–1001. [Google Scholar]
- Jayetileke, H. R.; De Mel, W. R.; Ratnayake, H. U. W. Modelling and simulation analysis of the genetic-fuzzy controller for speed regulation of a sensored BLDC motor using MATLAB/Simulink. Proc. IEEE ICIIS, 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Bača, J.; Kouřil, D.; Palacký, P.; Strossa, J. Induction motor drive with field-oriented control and speed estimation using feedforward neural network. Proc. Electric Power Engineering Conf., 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, M. Artificial neural network based speed estimator for sensorless FOC of three phase IM. Proc. ICECTE 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham Van, T.; Vo Tien, D.; Leonowicz, Z.; Jasinski, M.; Sikorski, T.; Chakrabarti, P. Online rotor and stator resistance estimation based on artificial neural network applied in sensorless induction motor drive. Energies 2020, vol. 13, 4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, J.; Sadighi, A.; Yazdi, M. R. H. Non-intrusive induction motor parameter estimation using MRAS algorithm and neural network rotor flux observer. Proc. ICRoM 2022, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Yang, K.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Improved active disturbance rejection control of permanent-magnet synchronous motor based on BP neural network. Proc. ICEMS 2020, 2137–2141. [Google Scholar]
- Jie, H.; Zheng, G.; Zou, J.; et al. Speed regulation based on adaptive control and RBFNN for PMSM considering parametric uncertainty and load fluctuation. IEEE Access 2020, vol. 8, 190147–190159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, X.; Quan, S.; Chen, J.; et al. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell-powered bidirectional DC motor control based on adaptive sliding-mode technique with neural network estimation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, vol. 45(no. 39), 20282–20292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, H. M.; Jlassi, I.; Cardoso, A. J. M.; et al. Model-free predictive current control of synchronous reluctance motors based on a recurrent neural network. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2021, vol. 69(no. 11), 10984–10992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.; Yang, J.; Mei, X.; et al. Deep reinforcement learning for permanent magnet synchronous motor speed control systems. Neural Comput. Appl. 2021, vol. 33, 5409–5418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pajchrowski, T.; Siwek, P.; Wójcik, A. Adaptive controller design for electric drive with variable parameters by reinforcement learning method. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 2020, vol. 68(no. 5), 1019–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poudel; Watson, T.; Li, W. Learning to control DC motor for micromobility in real time with reinforcement learning. Proc. IEEE ITSC, 2022; pp. 1248–1254. [Google Scholar]
- Malla; Panigrahi, I. Review of condition monitoring of rolling element bearing using vibration analysis and other techniques. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2019, vol. 7, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staton; Boglietti, A.; Cavagnino, A. Solving the more difficult aspects of electric motor thermal analysis in small and medium size industrial induction motors. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2005, vol. 20(no. 3), 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirchgässner, W.; Wallscheid, O.; Böcker, J. Estimating electric motor temperatures with deep residual machine learning. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, vol. 36(no. 7), 7480–7488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, K.; et al. Flux linkage tracking based permanent magnet temperature hybrid modeling and estimation for PMSMs with data-driven based core loss compensation. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Salah; Bacha, K.; Chaari, A. An improved spectral analysis of the stray flux component for the detection of air-gap irregularities in squirrel cage motors. ISA Trans. 2014, vol. 53(no. 3), 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sikder; Bhakta, K.; Al Nahid, A.; et al. Fault diagnosis of motor bearing using ensemble learning algorithm with FFT-based preprocessing. Proc. ICREST 2019, 564–569. [Google Scholar]
- Ciabattoni, L.; Cimini, G.; Ferracuti, F.; et al. A novel LDA-based approach for motor bearing fault detection. Proc. IEEE INDIN, 2015; pp. 771–776. [Google Scholar]
- Zanardelli, W. G.; Strangas, E. G.; Khalil, H. K.; et al. Wavelet-based methods for the prognosis of mechanical and electrical failures in electric motors. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2005, vol. 19(no. 2), 411–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuhaib, M.; Shaikh, F. A.; Tanweer, W.; et al. Faults feature extraction using discrete wavelet transform and artificial neural network for induction motor availability monitoring—Internet of Things enabled environment. Energies 2022, vol. 15(no. 21), 7888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konar; Chattopadhyay, P. Multi-class fault diagnosis of induction motor using Hilbert and wavelet transform. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, vol. 30, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro Junior, F.; dos Santos Areias, I. A.; Campos, M. M.; et al. Fault detection and diagnosis in electric motors using convolution neural network and short-time Fourier transform. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2022, vol. 10(no. 7), 2531–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B. S.; Han, T.; Yin, Z. J. Fault diagnosis system of induction motors using feature extraction, feature selection and classification algorithm. JSME Int. J. Ser. C 2006, vol. 49(no. 3), 734–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gangsar; Tiwari, R. Diagnostics of mechanical and electrical faults in induction motors using wavelet-based features of vibration and current through support vector machine algorithms for various operating conditions. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, vol. 41, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphey, Y. L.; Masrur, M. A.; Chen, Z. H.; et al. Model-based fault diagnosis in electric drives using machine learning. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2006, vol. 11(no. 3), 290–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L. Application of machine learning to a medium Gaussian support vector machine in the diagnosis of motor bearing faults. Electronics 2021, vol. 10(no. 18), 2266. [Google Scholar]
- Konar; Chattopadhyay, P. Bearing fault detection of induction motor using wavelet and support vector machines. Appl. Soft Comput. 2011, vol. 11(no. 6), 4203–4211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, D. H.; Youn, Y. W.; Sun, J. H.; et al. Support vector machine based bearing fault diagnosis for induction motors using vibration signals. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2015, vol. 10(no. 4), 1558–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Francos, D.; Martínez-Rego, D.; Fontenla-Romero, O.; et al. Automatic bearing fault diagnosis based on one-class ν-SVM. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2013, vol. 64(no. 1), 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senanayaka, J. S. L.; Kandukuri, S. T.; Van Khang, H.; et al. Early detection and classification of bearing faults using support vector machine algorithm. Proc. IEEE WEMDCD, 2017; pp. 250–255. [Google Scholar]
- Roy, S.; Dey, S.; Chatterjee, S. Autocorrelation aided random forest classifier-based bearing fault detection framework. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, vol. 20(no. 18), 10792–10800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozcan, H.; Devecioglu, O. C.; Ince, T.; et al. Enhanced bearing fault detection using multichannel, multilevel 1D CNN classifier. Electr. Eng. 2022, vol. 104(no. 2), 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eren, L.; Ince, T.; Kiranyaz, S. A generic intelligent bearing fault diagnosis system using compact adaptive 1D CNN classifier. J. Signal Process. Syst. 2019, vol. 91, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou; Hou, B.; Lei, J.; et al. Bearing fault diagnosis method based on EEMD and LSTM. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 2020, vol. 15(no. 1). [Google Scholar]
- Principi; Rossetti, D.; Squartini, S.; et al. Unsupervised electric motor fault detection by using deep autoencoders. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2019, vol. 6(no. 2), 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, M. T.; Kim, J. M.; Kim, C. H. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on improved GAN and 2-D representation of acoustic emission signals. IEEE Access 2022, vol. 10, 78056–78069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Data augmentation for intelligent mechanical fault diagnosis based on local shared multiple-generator GAN. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, vol. 22(no. 10), 9598–9609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Incremental single-class fault detection and diagnosis method for rolling bearings based on OS-ELM. Electronics 2023, vol. 12(no. 19), 4099. [Google Scholar]
- Coşkun; Kumralbaş, Z.; Çavuş, H.; et al. A syntactic pattern recognition based approach to online anomaly detection and identification on electric motors. Proc. DAGM German Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2022; pp. 116–132. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.; Liu, B.; Zhang, J.; et al. Fault mode detection of a hybrid electric vehicle by using support vector machine. Energy Rep. 2023, vol. 9, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gongora, W. S.; Goedtel, A.; da Silva, S. A. O.; et al. Neural approach to fault detection in three-phase induction motors. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 2016, vol. 14(no. 3), 1279–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quiroz, C.; Mariun, N.; Mehrjou, M. R.; et al. Fault detection of broken rotor bar in LS-PMSM using random forests. Measurement 2018, vol. 116, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Wei, L.; Gao, W. Application of CNN-based machine learning in the study of motor fault diagnosis. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, vol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim; Jung, J. H.; Ko, J. U.; et al. Direct connection-based convolutional neural network for fault diagnosis of rotor systems. IEEE Access 2020, vol. 8, 172043–172056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsueh, Y. M.; Ittangihal, V. R.; Wu, W. B.; et al. Fault diagnosis system for induction motors by CNN using empirical wavelet transform. Symmetry 2019, vol. 11(no. 10), 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skowron; Orlowska-Kowalska, T.; Wolkiewicz, M.; et al. Convolutional neural network-based stator current data-driven incipient stator fault diagnosis of inverter-fed induction motor. Energies 2020, vol. 13(no. 6), 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.-J.; Zhou, Z.-L.; Li, M.-H.; et al. Fault diagnosis of interturn short circuit of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on deep learning. Electr. Mach. Control 2020, vol. 24(no. 9). [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, D.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, L.; et al. Domain adaptive motor fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning. IEEE Access 2019, vol. 7, 80937–80949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bensaoucha; Brik, Y.; Moreau, S.; et al. Induction machine stator short-circuit fault detection using support vector machine. COMPEL 2021, vol. 40(no. 3), 373–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dos Santos, F. J. T. E.; Ferreira; Pires, J. M.; et al. Stator winding short-circuit fault diagnosis in induction motors using random forest. Proc. IEEE IEMDC, 2017; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, R.; Chen, F.; Dong, S. Compound fault diagnosis of stator interturn short circuit and air gap eccentricity based on random forest and XGBoost. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, vol. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Husari, F.; Seshadrinath, J. Early stator fault detection and condition identification in induction motor using novel deep network. IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell. 2021, vol. 3(no. 5), 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain; Soother, D. K.; Kalwar, I. H.; et al. Stator winding fault detection and classification in three-phase induction motor. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2021, vol. 29(no. 3), 869–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, L.; Luo, H.; Xu, S.; et al. Inverter fault diagnosis for a three-phase permanent-magnet synchronous motor drive system based on SDAE-GAN-LSTM. Electronics 2023, vol. 12(no. 19), 4172. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, D.; Ning, Z. Q.; Yang, B.; et al. Fault diagnosis of permanent magnet motor based on DCGAN-RCCNN. Energy Rep. 2022, vol. 8, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huangfu; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; et al. Research on inter-turn short circuit fault diagnosis of electromechanical actuator based on transfer learning and VGG16. Electronics 2022, vol. 11(no. 8), 1232. [Google Scholar]
- Reyes-Malanche; Villalobos-Pina, F. J.; Ramírez-Velasco, E.; et al. Short-circuit fault diagnosis on induction motors through electric current phasor analysis and fuzzy logic. Energies 2023, vol. 16(no. 1), 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahouee, R. A.; Mola, M. Inter-turn fault detection in PM synchronous motor by neuro-fuzzy technique. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2020, vol. 11(no. 5), 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Z. An artificial neural network method for remaining useful life prediction of equipment subject to condition monitoring. J. Intell. Manuf. 2012, vol. 23(no. 2), 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satishkumar, R.; Sugumaran, V. Estimation of remaining useful life of bearings based on support vector regression. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2016, vol. 9(no. 10), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Elasha, F.; Shanbr, S.; Mba, D. Remaining useful life prediction of rolling element bearings using supervised machine learning. Energies 2019, vol. 12(no. 14), 2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsrogy, W. M.; Fkirin, M. A.; Hassan, M. A. M. Speed control of DC motor using PID controller based on artificial intelligence techniques. Proc. CoDIT 2013, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sasaki, H.; Igarashi, H. Topology optimization of IPM motor with aid of deep learning. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 2019, vol. 59(no. 1), 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham; Cord, M.; Delany, S. J. “Supervised learning,” in Machine Learning Techniques for Multimedia; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008; pp. 21–49. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao; Bose, B. K. Neural-network-based waveform processing and delayless filtering in power electronics and AC drives. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2004, vol. 51(no. 5), 981–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, Z.; Yang, C.; Song, Z. Improved kernel PCA-based monitoring approach for nonlinear processes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, vol. 64(no. 9), 2245–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaelbling, P.; Littman, M. L.; Moore, A. W. Reinforcement learning: A survey. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 1996, vol. 4, 237–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Machine Type | Input Energy | Output Energy | Main Purpose | Examples |
| Motor | Electrical Energy | Mechanical Energy | Drive mechanical loads | Induction Motor, PMSM, BLDC Motor, DC Motor |
| Generator | Mechanical Energy | Electrical Energy | Produce electrical power | Synchronous Generator, Induction Generator, Permanent Magnet Generator |
| Transformer | Electrical Energy | Electrical Energy (Different Voltage Level) | Voltage transformation and power transfer | Power Transformer, Distribution Transformer, Instrument Transformer |
| Fault Category | Typical Faults | Key Indicators | Impact | Reference |
| Mechanical | Bearing defects, misalignment, rotor imbalance | Vibration, acoustic emissions, noise | Reduced efficiency and mechanical failure | [91] |
| Electrical | Winding faults, broken rotor bars, insulation breakdown, partial discharge | Current harmonics, voltage imbalance, temperature rise | Power losses and overheating | [92] |
| Thermal | Overheating, hot spots, insulation aging | Temperature profiles, thermal imaging | Accelerated aging and reduced lifespan | [93,94] |
| Transformer | Winding deformation, oil contamination, core faults | Dissolved gas analysis, oil quality, temperature | Reduced reliability and service interruption | [95] |
| Environmental | Corrosion, moisture ingress, dust contamination | Insulation degradation, leakage currents | Premature component degradation | [96] |
| Data Source | Measured Parameters |
Key Fault Indicators |
Typical Faults Detected |
Monitoring Technique |
Reference |
| Electrical | Current, voltage, power, harmonics, flux | Current imbalance, harmonic distortion, sideband frequencies | Stator winding faults, broken rotor bars, insulation degradation, phase imbalance | Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA), power quality analysis | [112] |
| Mechanical | Vibration, displacement, speed, torque | Vibration amplitude, characteristic frequencies, kurtosis | Bearing defects, misalignment, rotor imbalance, eccentricity | Vibration analysis, FFT, envelope analysis | [113] |
| Thermal | Temperature, infrared images | Temperature rise, hot spots, thermal gradients | Overheating, poor cooling, insulation aging | Temperature sensing, infrared thermography | [114] |
| Acoustic | Acoustic signals, acoustic emissions | Peak amplitude, high-frequency components, acoustic energy | Bearing wear, lubrication issues, partial discharge | Acoustic emission monitoring, spectrogram analysis | [115] |
| Chemical | Dissolved gases, oil quality, moisture content | Gas concentration ratios, moisture levels, oil degradation | Internal arcing, thermal faults, insulation degradation | Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA), oil analysis | [116] |
| Operational and Environmental | Load, ambient temperature, humidity, operating profile | Load variation, overload events, environmental stresses | Overloading, frequent start-stop cycles, environmental degradation | SCADA systems, IoT sensors, environmental monitoring | [117] |
| Strategy | Approach | Data Requirement |
Decision Basis | Key Objective | Limitations |
| Corrective Maintenance (Reactive) | Maintenance is performed after failure occurs | None or minimal | Failure occurrence | Restore operation after failure |
Unplanned downtime; high repair cost; safety risks |
| Preventive Maintenance (Time-Based) | Maintenance is scheduled at fixed intervals | Historical maintenance records | Time or usage intervals | Preventing unexpected failures |
Over-maintenance; unnecessary component replacement |
| Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) | Maintenance is triggered by machine condition | Real-time or periodic sensor data | Actual equipment health | Detect degradation early | Requires monitoring infrastructure and expert interpretation |
| Predictive Maintenance (PdM) | Maintenance is based on prognostic models | Historical and real-time operational data | Predicted future condition | Predict failures and estimate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) | Requires large datasets and advanced analytics |
| Prescriptive Maintenance (AI-Driven) | Maintenance actions are automatically recommended |
Real-time, historical, and contextual data | Optimized AI-based decisions | Recommend optimal maintenance actions | High implementation complexity; cybersecurity and data privacy concerns |
| Deep Learning Model | Input Data | Typical Applications | Key Advantage |
| Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) | Vibration signals, thermal images, spectrograms, current signals | Bearing fault diagnosis, stator winding fault detection, transformer condition assessment | Automatic feature extraction from spatial and time-frequency data |
| Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) |
Sequential sensor data and time-series signals | Machine degradation modelling and fault prediction | Captures temporal dependencies |
| Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) | Vibration, current, temperature, and historical operational data | Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction and predictive maintenance | Learns long-term temporal relationships |
| Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) | Time-series sensor data | Fault diagnosis and prognostics | Lower computational complexity than LSTM |
| Autoencoder (AE) | Unlabelled sensor data | Anomaly detection and feature extraction | Learns compact data representations without labels |
| Variational Autoencoder (VAE) | Multimodal sensor data | Fault detection and data generation | Handles uncertainty and complex data distributions |
| Deep Belief Network (DBN) | Vibration and current signals | Fault classification and condition monitoring | Effective hierarchical feature learning |
| Transformer | Long sequential data and multimodal datasets | Fault diagnosis, prognostics, and RUL estimation | Captures long-range dependencies using attention mechanisms |
| Hybrid Models (CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU) | Time-frequency representations and sequential data | Fault diagnosis and predictive maintenance | Combines spatial and temporal features learning |
| Hybrid AI Approach |
Components | Typical Applications | Key Advantage | Reference |
| FFT + SVM | Fast Fourier Transform + Support Vector Machine | Bearing fault diagnosis, rotor fault detection | Improved frequency-domain feature extraction | [185] |
| WT + ANN | Wavelet Transform + Artificial Neural Network | Stator winding fault diagnosis, transformer monitoring | Effective analysis of non-stationary signals | [186] |
| EMD + RF | Empirical Mode Decomposition + Random Forest | Vibration-based fault classification | Enhanced feature quality and robustness | [187] |
| VMD + XGBoost | Variational Mode Decomposition + Extreme Gradient Boosting | Predictive maintenance and anomaly detection | Improved classification accuracy | [188] |
| GA + ANN | Genetic Algorithm + Artificial Neural Network | Feature selection and model optimization | Reduced computational complexity | [189] |
| PSO + SVM | Particle Swarm Optimization + Support Vector Machine | Fault diagnosis and condition monitoring | Optimized hyperparameter tuning | [190] |
| CNN + LSTM | Convolutional Neural Network + Long Short-Term Memory | Fault diagnosis and Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction | Combined spatial and temporal feature learning | [191] |
| CNN + GRU | Convolutional Neural Network + Gated Recurrent Unit | Time-series fault classification | Lower computational complexity than CNN-LSTM | [192] |
| Ensemble Learning | Multiple classifiers (bagging, boosting, stacking) | Fault classification and prognostics | Improved robustness and generalization | [193] |
| Digital Twin + AI | Physics-based model + Machine Learning/Deep Learning | Predictive maintenance and maintenance optimization | Enhanced interpretability and real-time decision-making | [194] |
| Machine Type | Common Faults |
Monitoring Data |
AI Techniques |
Primary Objective |
Reference |
| Electric Motors |
Bearing faults, broken rotor bars, stator winding faults, eccentricity | Vibration, current, temperature, acoustic signals | SVM, RF, CNN, LSTM | Fault diagnosis and predictive maintenance | [207] |
| Generators | Rotor faults, stator faults, bearing defects, partial discharge | Vibration, current, temperature, partial discharge data | CNN, LSTM, Hybrid AI | Fault detection and degradation assessment | [208] |
| Transformers | Insulation aging, winding deformation, oil contamination, core faults | DGA, thermal data, oil quality, partial discharge | ANN, SVM, XGBoost, CNN | Fault classification and asset management | [209] |
| AI Technique | Fault Diagnosis |
Anomaly Detection |
RUL Estimation |
Predictive Maintenance |
Digital Twin Integration |
| Machine Learning | High | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
| Deep Learning | Very High | High | Very High | Very High | High |
| Reinforcement Learning | Low | Medium | High | Very High | High |
| Hybrid AI | Very High | Very High | Very High | Very High | Very High |
| Explainable AI (XAI) |
Medium | Medium | Medium | High | High |
| Challenge Area | Key Issues | Future Research Directions |
| Data Availability and Quality | Limited labelled fault data, class imbalance, noisy and missing data | Open-access datasets, data augmentation, synthetic data generation, transfer learning |
| Model Generalization |
Performance degradation under varying operating conditions | Domain adaptation, continual learning, self-supervised learning |
| Interpretability and Trustworthiness | Black-box models, limited transparency, lack of user trust | Explainable AI (XAI), human-in-the-loop frameworks, trustworthy AI |
| Computational Complexity | High computational and memory requirements | Model compression, lightweight networks, edge AI, hardware acceleration |
| Data Privacy and Cybersecurity | Data leakage, adversarial attacks, insecure communications | Federated learning, blockchain, privacy-preserving AI, secure protocols |
| Standardization and Benchmarking | Lack of common datasets, metrics, and validation procedures | Standardized datasets, interoperability frameworks, benchmarking protocols |
| Integration with Emerging Technologies | Challenges in integrating AI with IIoT, Digital Twins, and cloud platforms | Unified architecture for Digital Twins, edge computing, and 5G/6G networks |
| Human–AI Collaboration | Limited user acceptance and dependence on expert knowledge | Human-in-the-loop systems, explainable decision support tools |
| Sustainability and Energy Efficiency | High energy consumption of large AI models | Green AI, energy-efficient algorithms, sustainable computing frameworks |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).