Submitted:
17 June 2026
Posted:
03 August 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Context
1.2. Motivation
1.3. Research Gap
1.4. Scope and Contribution of the Present Work
- A structured interpretation of Digital Twin concepts applied to material-level design rather than system-level monitoring
- A physics-informed parametric framework for evaluating thermal behaviour in functionally graded structures
- A quantitative assessment of thermal performance, demonstrating a significant reduction in heat flux relative to homogeneous configurations under identical boundary conditions

2. Background and State of the Art
2.1. Digital Twin in Aerospace
2.2. Functionally Graded Materials (FGMs)
2.3. Additive Manufacturing (AM) for Space Applications
3. Digital Twin–Driven Design Framework
3.1. Framework Architecture

3.2. Definition of Functionally Graded Material

3.3. Governing Physics
3.3.1. Heat Conduction in Graded Media
3.3.2. Radiation Attenuation
3.4. Digital Twin–Based Iterative Design Loop
- heat flux at the hot surface,
- spatial distribution of temperature gradients, and
- reduction in transmitted radiation intensity.
4. Methodology
4.1. Numerical Model
4.2. Boundary Conditions
4.3. Model Parameters
4.4. Parametric Cases
- : homogeneous material (constant thermal conductivity)
- : weak grading
- : linear grading
- : moderate nonlinear grading
- : strong nonlinear grading
- : extreme nonlinear grading
4.5. Two-Dimensional Extension
5. Results
5.1. Temperature Distribution
5.2. Radiation Attenuation
5.3. Heat Flux Analysis
5.4. Temperature Gradient Analysis

5.5. Coupled Thermal–Radiation Performance

5.6. Implications for Additive Manufacturing Constraints
5.7. Literature Consistency and Model Validation
6. Discussion
6.1. Mechanism of Thermal Performance Enhancement in FGMs
6.2. Role of the Digital Twin Framework in Material-Level Design
6.3. Engineering Implications for Deep Space Structures
6.4. Limitations and Future Directions
7. Future Work
8. Conclusion
Acknowledgments
Consent to Publish
Consent to Participate
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Competing Interests
Availability of Data and Materials
Author Contributions
AI Disclosure
Appendix A. Computational Framework
Appendix A.1. Governing Formulation
Appendix A.2. Radiation Attenuation Model
Appendix A.3. Numerical Implementation
Appendix A.4. Parametric and Extended Analysis
Appendix A.5. Remarks on Computational Scope
References
- Tuegel, Eric J., et al. “Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin.” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2011 (2011): 154798.
- Tuegel, Eric. “The airframe digital twin: some challenges to realization.” 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Conference. 2012.
- Seshadri, Banavara R., and Thiagarajan Krishnamurthy. “Structural health management of damaged aircraft structures using digital twin concept.” AIAA Adaptive Structures Conference. 2017.
- Bachelor, Gray, et al. “Model-based design of complex aeronautical systems through digital twin and thread concepts.” IEEE Systems Journal 14.2 (2019): 1568–1579.
- Ye, Yumei, et al. “Digital twin for the structural health management of reusable spacecraft: A case study.” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 234 (2020): 107076. [CrossRef]
- Li, L., Aslam, S., Wileman, A., & Perinpanayagam, S. “Digital twin in aerospace industry: A gentle introduction.” IEEE Access 10 (2021): 9543–9562.
- Xiong, Minglan, and Huawei Wang. “Digital twin applications in aviation industry: A review.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 121.9 (2022): 5677–5692. [CrossRef]
- Brás, Isabel Malheiros. Framework for Digital Twin Concept Application in Aerospace Structures. MS thesis, Universidade do Minho, 2024.
- Tavares, S. M., Ribeiro, J. A., Ribeiro, B. A., & de Castro, P. M. “Aircraft structural design and life-cycle assessment through digital twins.” Designs 8.2 (2024): 29.
- Shiota, Ichiro, and Yoshinari Miyamoto, eds. Functionally Graded Materials 1996. Elsevier, 1997.
- Mueller, Eckhard, et al. “Functionally graded materials for sensor and energy applications.” Materials Science and Engineering: A 362.1–2 (2003): 17–39. [CrossRef]
- Na, Kyung-Su, and Ji-Hwan Kim. “Three-dimensional thermal buckling analysis of functionally graded materials.” Composites Part B: Engineering 35.5 (2004): 429–437. [CrossRef]
- Yildirim, Bora. “An equivalent domain integral method for fracture analysis of functionally graded materials under thermal stresses.” Journal of Thermal Stresses 29.4 (2006): 371–397. [CrossRef]
- Birman, Victor, and Larry W. Byrd. “Modeling and analysis of functionally graded materials and structures.” (2007): 195–216. [CrossRef]
- Bohidar, Shailendra Kumar, Ritesh Sharma, and Prabhat Ranjan Mishra. “Functionally graded materials: A critical review.” International Journal of Research 1.7 (2014): 289–301.
- Udupa, Gururaja, S. Shrikantha Rao, and K. V. Gangadharan. “Functionally graded composite materials: an overview.” Procedia Materials Science 5 (2014): 1291–1299. [CrossRef]
- Niendorf, Thomas, et al. “Functionally graded alloys obtained by additive manufacturing.” Advanced Engineering Materials 16.7 (2014).
- Sharma, Rajesh, V. Kumar Jadon, and B. Singh. “A review on the finite element methods for heat conduction in functionally graded materials.” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India) 96.1 (2015): 73–81.
- Yang, Kai, et al. “A new analytical approach of functionally graded material structures for thermal stress BEM analysis.” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 62 (2015): 26–32. [CrossRef]
- Burlayenko, V. N., et al. “Modelling functionally graded materials in heat transfer and thermal stress analysis.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 45 (2017): 422–438. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Binbin, et al. “Additive manufacturing of functionally graded material objects: a review.” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 18.4 (2018): 041002.
- Trudel, Eric P., et al. “Multiscale design optimization of additively manufactured aerospace structures employing functionally graded lattice materials.” AIAA SciTech Forum. 2019.
- Li, Yan, et al. “A review on functionally graded materials and structures via additive manufacturing.” Advanced Materials Technologies 5.6 (2020): 1900981.
- Reichardt, Ashley, et al. “Advances in additive manufacturing of metal-based functionally graded materials.” International Materials Reviews 66.1 (2021): 1–29.
- Miteva, Adelina, and Anna Bouzekova-Penkova. “Some aerospace applications of functionally graded materials.” Aerospace Research in Bulgaria 33 (2021): 195–209.
- Van Doan, Dao, et al. “An overview of functionally graded materials: from civil applications to defense and aerospace industries.” Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies 13.1 (2025): 68. [CrossRef]
- Li, Kun, et al. “High performance realization of functionally graded materials based on integrated optimal design and additive manufacturing: A review.” International Materials Reviews 70.6 (2025): 497–547. [CrossRef]
- Amiri Delouei, Amin, et al. “A review on analytical heat transfer in functionally graded materials.” Journal of Thermal Science 34.4 (2025): 1358–1386. [CrossRef]
- Olatunji-Ojo, A. O., Boetcher, S. K., & Cundari, T. R. “Thermal conduction analysis of layered functionally graded materials.” Computational Materials Science 54 (2012): 329–335. [CrossRef]
- Townsend, Lawrence W., John W. Wilson, and John E. Nealy. “Space radiation shielding strategies and requirements for deep space missions.” SAE Technical Paper (1989).
- Wilson, J. W., et al. “Deep space environment and shielding.” AIP Conference Proceedings 654.1 (2003).
- Singleterry, R. C. “Radiation engineering analysis of shielding materials.” Acta Astronautica 91 (2013): 49–54. [CrossRef]
- Sihver, Lembit, et al. “Radiation environment onboard spacecraft at LEO and in deep space.” IEEE Aerospace Conference. 2016.
- Barthel, Joseph, and Nesrin Sarigul-Klijn. “Radiation production and absorption in spacecraft shielding systems.” Acta Astronautica 144 (2018): 254–262. [CrossRef]
- Sihver, Lembit, and S. M. J. Mortazavi. “Radiation risks and countermeasures for humans on deep space missions.” IEEE Aerospace Conference. 2019.
- Chowdhury, Rajarshi Pal, et al. “Hybrid methods of radiation shielding against deep-space radiation.” Life Sciences in Space Research 38 (2023): 67–78. [CrossRef]
- Bannova, Olga, and Eszter Gulacsi. “Architectural approach for evaluation of radiation shielding integration in space habitats.” Acta Astronautica 220 (2024): 27–36. [CrossRef]
- Atwell, William. “Radiation environments for deep-space missions and exposure estimates.” AIAA SPACE Conference. 2007.
- Crusan, Jason C., et al. “Deep space gateway concept: Extending human presence into cislunar space.” IEEE Aerospace Conference. 2018.
- Bobskill, Marianne R., and Mark L. Lupisella. “The role of cislunar space in future global space exploration.” Global Space Exploration Conference. 2012.
- Simón, Xavier, et al. “A crewed lunar lander concept utilizing the cislunar gateway.” AIAA SPACE Forum. 2018.
- Duggan, Matthew, Xavier Simon, and Travis Moseman. “Lander and cislunar gateway architecture concepts for lunar exploration.” IEEE Aerospace Conference. 2019.
- Mammarella, Martina, et al. “A sustainable bridge between low Earth orbit and cislunar infrastructures.” International Astronautical Congress. 2016.
- Casanova, Sophia, et al. “Enabling deep space exploration with in-space propellant depots.” AIAA SPACE Forum. 2017.
- Klonowski, Michael, et al. “Cislunar space domain awareness architecture design.” Journal of the Astronautical Sciences 71.5 (2024): 47. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, Saroj, L. Dale Thomas, and Jason T. Cassibry. “Application of nuclear thermal propulsion for sustainable cislunar exploration.” Acta Astronautica 228 (2025): 435–441. [CrossRef]
- Karkadakattil, Aswin. “Laser-Based Thorium Processing for In-Situ Nuclear Power Generation in Space Exploration.” Acceleron Aerospace Journal 5.1 (2025): 1258–1273. [CrossRef]
- Karkadakattil, A. AI-tuned hybrid thermal control of CubeSats using phase change material: a MATLAB-based simulation study. AS (2025). [CrossRef]
- Karkadakattil, Aswin. “Analytical Modelling and Parametric Optimization of Hybrid Hydrogen-Electric Propulsion for Long-Endurance UAVs.” Transactions on Aerospace Research, vol. 2026, no. 1, ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION, 2026, pp. 1-37. [CrossRef]
- Aswin KARKADAKATTIL, Orbit-Coupled Multiphysics Degradation Modelling of CubeSat Lithium-Ion Batteries, pp. 37-64. [CrossRef]
- Karkadakattil, A. (2026). Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Deep-Space Missions: Technologies, Challenges, and Future Outlook. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1–25. [CrossRef]




| Domain | Representative Studies | Focus | Methodology | Key Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Twin in Aerospace | [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] | Structural health monitoring, system-level simulation | Physics-based modelling + data integration | Limited incorporation of material-level design variables |
| Functionally Graded Materials | [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,28,29] | Thermal and mechanical behaviour of graded materials | Analytical and finite element modelling | Typically studied in isolation without iterative design frameworks |
| Additive Manufacturing for FGMs | [21,22,23,24,25,26,27] | Fabrication of graded and multi-material structures | Experimental and process-based studies | Weak integration with predictive modelling and optimization frameworks |
| Parameter | Value | Description / Material System |
|---|---|---|
| Thickness (L) | 5 mm | Representative thickness for structural shielding elements in spacecraft panels |
| Thermal conductivity (k1, k2) | 25 → 5 W/m·K | Corresponds to grading from metal-rich Ti-6Al-4V (high conductivity) to ceramic-rich Al2O3 / YSZ (low conductivity), achievable via additive manufacturing |
| Radiation attenuation coefficient (μ) | 150 m−1 | Effective attenuation parameter for simplified shielding model; represents average behaviour across graded composition |
| Hot-side temperature | 400 K | Representative solar-exposed surface condition in deep space |
| Cold-side temperature | 250 K | Representative deep space-facing radiative cooling condition |
| Grading Exponent (n) | Heat Flux (W/m2) | Radiation Transmission (I/I0) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 750,000 | 0.2231 |
| 0.5 | 439,386 | 0.3385 |
| 1.0 | 369,095 | 0.4169 |
| 2.0 | 270,957 | 0.5134 |
| 3.0 | 231,631 | 0.5698 |
| 5.0 | 199,043 | 0.6323 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.