Submitted:
30 July 2026
Posted:
30 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Reactive Molecular Dynamics with ReaxFF
2.2. The Cutoff Radius for Dilute Gases
2.3. Reconstruction of the Reaction Network by Co-Occurrence Signatures
2.4. Energy Costs and Thermochemical Validation
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. The Cutoff Radius Is Critical for Dilute-Gas RMD
3.2. Temperature Threshold and Global Kinetics
3.3. Energy Costs Rise with Temperature and Approach the Kirchhoff Limit
3.4. The Elementary Reaction Network Is Temperature-Invariant
3.5. Hydrogen Originates from Abstraction, Not from Recombination
3.6. The Rate-Limiting Step: Sulfur Condensation
3.7. Limitations
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- De Crisci, A.G.; Moniri, A.; Xu, Y. Hydrogen from Hydrogen Sulfide: Towards a More Sustainable Hydrogen Economy. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44, 1299–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spatolisano, E.; Restelli, F.; Pellegrini, L.A.; de Angelis, A.R. Waste to H2 Sustainable Processes: A Review on H2S Valorization Technologies. Energies 2024, 17, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Imperio, S.; Lehr, C.R.; Oduro, H.; Druschel, G.; Kühl, M.; McDermott, T.R. Relative Importance of H2 and H2 S as Energy Sources for Primary Production in Geothermal Springs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5802–5808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elsner, M.P.; Menge, M.; Müller, C.; Agar, D.W. The Claus Process: Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks. Catal. Today 2003, 79–80, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaloidas, V.E.; Papayannakos, N.G. Hydrogen Production from the Decomposition of Hydrogen Sulphide. Equilibrium Studies on the System H2S/ H2/Si, (i = 1,…,8) in the Gas Phase. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 1987, 12, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowman, C.T.; Dodge, L.G. Kinetics of the Thermal Decomposition of Hydrogen Sulfide behind Shock Waves. Symp. Int. Combust. 1977, 16, 971–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karan, K.; Mehrotra, A.K.; Behie, L.A. On reaction kinetics for the thermal decomposition of hydrogen sulfide. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaloidas, V.; Papayannakos, N. Kinetics of Thermal, Non-Catalytic Decomposition of Hydrogen Sulphide. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1989, 44, 2493–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.-Z.; Wang, W.; Thille, C.; Bogaerts, A. H2S Decomposition into H2 and S2 by Plasma Technology: Comparison of Gliding Arc and Microwave Plasma. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2020, 40, 1163–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sassi, M.; Amira, N. Chemical Reactor Network Modeling of a Microwave Plasma Thermal Decomposition of H2S into Hydrogen and Sulfur. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 10010–10019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woiki, D.; Roth, P. Kinetics of the High-Temperature H2S Decomposition. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 12958–12963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olschewski, H.A.; Troe, J.; Wagner, H.Gg. UV Absorption Study of the Thermal Decomposition Reaction H2S.Fwdarw. H2 + S(3P). J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 12964–12967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiina, H.; Oya, M.; Yamashita, K.; Miyoshi, A.; Matsui, H. Kinetic Studies on the Pyrolysis of H2S. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 2136–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senftle, T.P.; Hong, S.; Islam, M.M.; Kylasa, S.B.; Zheng, Y.; Shin, Y.K.; Junkermeier, C.; Engel-Herbert, R.; Janik, M.J.; Aktulga, H.M.; et al. The ReaxFF Reactive Force-Field: Development, Applications and Future Directions. npj Comput. Mater. 2016, 2, 15011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chenoweth, K.; van Duin, A.C.T.; Goddard, W.A. ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 1040–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.-H.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Chen, J.-G.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.-T.; Wang, B.; Liu, Z.-W. ReaxFF MD Simulations of Thermolysis Mechanism of 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2026, 1260, 115788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; van Duin, A.C.T. Improvement of the ReaxFF Description for Functionalized Hydrocarbon/Water Weak Interactions in the Condensed Phase. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 4083–4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rappe, A.K.; Goddard, W.A.I. Charge Equilibration for Molecular Dynamics Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3358–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, A.P.; Aktulga, H.M.; Berger, R.; Bolintineanu, D.S.; Brown, W.M.; Crozier, P.S.; in ’t Veld, P.J.; Kohlmeyer, A.; Moore, S.G.; Nguyen, T.D.; et al. LAMMPS - a Flexible Simulation Tool for Particle-Based Materials Modeling at the Atomic, Meso, and Continuum Scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022, 271, 108171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shinoda, W.; Shiga, M.; Mikami, M. Rapid Estimation of Elastic Constants by Molecular Dynamics Simulation under Constant Stress. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 134103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peña-Obeso, P.J.; Huirache-Acuña, R.; Ramirez-Zavaleta, F.I.; Rivera, J.L. Stability of Non-Concentric, Multilayer, and Fully Aligned Porous MoS2 Nanotubes. Membranes 2022, 12, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voyiatzis, E.; Stepanyan, R. Sensitivity Analysis of ReaxFF Potential: The Case of Si/O System. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126, 7027–7036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nwankwo, U.; Lam, C.-H.; Onofrio, N. Reactive Force Field Potential with Shielded Long-Range Coulomb Interaction: Application to Graphene–Water Capacitors. J. Appl. Phys. 2023, 134, 184502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera, J.L.; Molina-Rodríguez, L.; Ramos-Estrada, M.; Navarro-Santos, P.; Lima, E. Interfacial Properties of the Ionic Liquid [Bmim][Triflate] over a Wide Range of Temperatures. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 10115–10123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rivera, J.L.; Douglas, J.F. Influence of Film Thickness on the Stability of Free-Standing Lennard-Jones Fluid Films. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 144705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lemmon, E.W.; Span, R. Short Fundamental Equations of State for 20 Industrial Fluids. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2006, 51, 785–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galler, B.A.; Fisher, M.J. An Improved Equivalence Algorithm. Commun. ACM 1964, 7, 301–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoshen, J.; Kopelman, R. Percolation and Cluster Distribution. I. Cluster Multiple Labeling Technique and Critical Concentration Algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 14, 3438–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoddard, S.D. Identifying Clusters in Computer Experiments on Systems of Particles. J. Comput. Phys. 1978, 27, 291–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flyvbjerg, H.; Petersen, H.G. Error Estimates on Averages of Correlated Data. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 91, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Efron, B. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. In Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution; Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, 1992; pp. 569–593. ISBN 978-1-4612-4380-9. [Google Scholar]
- Shiell, R.C.; Hu, X.K.; Hu, Q.J.; Hepburn, J.W. A Determination of the Bond Dissociation Energy (D0(H−SH)): Threshold Ion-Pair Production Spectroscopy (TIPPS) of a Triatomic Molecule. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 4339–4342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peebles, L.R.; Marshall, P. High-Accuracy Coupled-Cluster Computations of Bond Dissociation Energies in SH, H2S, and H2O. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 3132–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McBride, B.; Zehe, M.; Gordon, S. NASA Glenn Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Species. 2002. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Nezbeda, I. Role of the Range of Intermolecular Interactions in Fluids. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 9, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sendt, K.; Jazbec, M.; Haynes, B.S. Chemical Kinetic Modeling of the H/S System: H2S Thermolysis and H2 Sulfidation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2002, 29, 2439–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshimura, M.; Koshi, M.; Matsui, H.; Kamiya, K.; Umeyama, H. Non-Arrhenius Temperature Dependence of the Rate Constant for the H + H2S Reaction. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 189, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamberts, T.; Kästner, J. Tunneling Reaction Kinetics for the Hydrogen Abstraction Reaction H + H2S → H2 + HS in the Interstellar Medium. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 9736–9741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, J.; Hu, X.; Marshall, P. Experimental and Ab Initio Investigations of the Kinetics of the Reaction of H Atoms with H2S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 5307–5311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Reaction | 2500 K | 3000 K | 3500 K |
|---|---|---|---|
| H₂S ⇌ HS• + H• (homolysis) | 3618 / 3588 | 8073 / 7930 | 10789 / 10734 |
| H• + H₂S ⇌ H₂ + HS• (abstraction) | 279 / 249 | 2440 / 2402 | 3604 / 3562 |
| H₂S ⇌ H₂ + S (elimination) | 18 / 11 | 170 / 150 | 530 / 471 |
| 2 HS• ⇌ HSSH (bound ≥10 ps) | 120 / 120 | 810 / 797 | 1373 / 1271 |
| HSSH ⇌ H₂S + S (disproportionation) | 43 / 43 | 495 / 486 | 924 / 826 |
| H• + H• → H₂ (persistent ≥10 ps) | 1 | 13 | 17 |
| T (K) | t (ns) | H₂S (conv.) | HS• | H• | H₂ | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2500 | 130 | 913 (8.7%) | 87 | 5 | 41 | 0 |
| 3000 | 167 | 733 (26.7%) | 257 | 75 | 101 | 10 |
| 3500 | 157 | 537 (46.3%) | 406 | 226 | 147 | 57 |
| Species | 2500 K | 3000 K | 3500 K |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSSH (2 S) | 27.9 | 11.7 | 2.4 |
| S₂ / HS₂• | 49.0 | 16.9 | 18.7 |
| S₃ species | n/f | 73.6 | 35.8 |
| S₄ species | n/f | n/f | transient (~87) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).