Submitted:
28 July 2026
Posted:
29 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Ethical Considerations
2.3. Educational Setting
2.4. Active Learning Strategy
Education Tools
2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results

4. Discussion
6. Limitations
5. Conclusions
References
- Meek, J.Y.; Noble, L. Section on Breastfeeding. Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk. Pediatrics 2022, 150(1), e2022057988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Breastfeeding. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/breastfeeding (accessed on 1 June 2026).
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 756: Optimizing Support for Breastfeeding as Part of Obstetric Practice. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 132(4), e187–e196. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Breastfeeding, Family Physicians Supporting (Position Paper). AAFP. Available online: https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/breastfeeding-position-paper (accessed on 1 June 2026).
- CDC. Breastfeeding Recommendations and Guidance. Breastfeeding. 27 April 2026. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/php/guidelines-recommendations/index.html (accessed on 1 June 2026).
- Scott, I.A.; Hubbard, R.E.; Crock, C.; Campbell, T.; Perera, M. Developing critical thinking skills for delivering optimal care. Intern Med. J. 2021, 51(4), 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sigman-Grant, M.; Kim, Y. Breastfeeding Knowledge and Attitudes of Nevada Health Care Professionals Remain Virtually Unchanged over 10 Years. J. Hum. Lact Off. J. Int. Lact Consult Assoc. 2016, 32(2), 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McGuinness, D.; Ni Mhurchu, S.; Frazer, K.; et al. A co-designed evaluation study to identify Breastfeeding Knowledge of General Practitioners’ and Practice Nurses’. Health Promot Int. 2024, 39(2), daae021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radoff, K.; Forman, R. Lactation Education for Resident Obstetricians: Promoting Breastfeeding Advocates for the Future. J. Midwifery Womens Health 2019, 64(6), 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shen, Y.; Rudesill, R. Impact of an Educational Intervention on Breastfeeding Counseling Behavior of OB/GYN Residents. Breastfeed. Med. Off. J. Acad. Breastfeed. Med. 2016, 11(6), 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ogburn, T.; Espey, E.; Leeman, L.; Alvarez, K. A Breastfeeding Curriculum for Residents and Medical Students: A Multidisciplinary Approach. J. Hum. Lact Off. J. Int. Lact Consult Assoc. 2005, 21, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feldman-Winter, L.; Barone, L.; Milcarek, B.; et al. Residency curriculum improves breastfeeding care. Pediatrics 2010, 126(2), 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- López-Bassols I, Cameron J, Biazus-Dalcin C, McFadden A. In-Depth Breastfeeding Training for Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. J Hum Lact Off J Int Lact Consult Assoc. Published online June 23, 2026:8903344261446138. doi:10.1177/08903344261446138. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chuisano, S.A.; Anderson, O.S. Assessing Application-Based Breastfeeding Education for Physicians and Nurses: A Scoping Review. J. Hum. Lact Off. J. Int. Lact Consult Assoc. 2020, 36(4), 699–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gary, A.J.; Birmingham, E.E.; Jones, L.B. Improving breastfeeding medicine in undergraduate medical education: A student survey and extensive curriculum review with suggestions for improvement. Educ. Health 2017, 30(2), 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dosedel, E. Compensation and Benefits Survey 2021. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2021, 121(11), 2314–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theurich, M.A.; McCool, M.E. Moving National Breastfeeding Policies into Practice: A Plea to Integrate Lactation Education and Training into Nutrition and Dietetics Programs in the United States. J. Hum. Lact Off. J. Int. Lact Consult Assoc. 2016, 32(3), 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Douglas, C.; Camel, S. Integrated Advanced Education Supports Future Registered Dietitian Nutritionists’ Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy in Practice. J. Diet. Educ. 2025, 3(2). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonwell, C.C.; Eison, J.A. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183 ($17. 1991. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED336049 (accessed on 23 April 2025).
- Brame, C.J. Chapter 4 - Active Learning: The Student Work That Builds Understanding. In Science Teaching Essentials; Brame, C.J., Ed.; Academic Press, 2019; pp. 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Styers, M.L.; Van Zandt, P.A.; Hayden, K.L. Active Learning in Flipped Life Science Courses Promotes Development of Critical Thinking Skills. CBE—Life Sci. Educ. 2018, 17(3), ar39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walker, S.E. Active Learning Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking. J. Athl. Train. 2003, 38(3), 263–267. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Charney, P.; Peterson, S.J. Practice Paper of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Abstract: Critical Thinking Skills in Nutrition Assessment and Diagnosis. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2013, 113(11), 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancin, S.; Reggiani, F.; Calatroni, M.; Morenghi, E.; Andreoli, D.; Mazzoleni, B. Enhancing clinical nutrition education for healthcare professionals: Engagement through active learning methodologies. Clin. Nutr. Open Sci. 2023, 52, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coakley, K.E.; Pribis, P. Dietetics students’ perceptions of classroom-based learning activities. Educ. Health Abingdon Engl. 2021, 34(2), 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sadovnikova, A.; Chuisano, S.A.; Ma, K.; et al. Development and evaluation of a high-fidelity lactation simulation model for health professional breastfeeding education. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2020, 15, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wood, N.I.; Gleit, R.D.; Levine, D.L. Culinary nutrition course equips future physicians to educate patients on a healthy diet: an interventional pilot study. BMC Med. Educ. 2021, 21(1), 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szeto, A.; Haines, J.; Buchholz, A.C. Impact of an Optional Experiential Learning Opportunity on Student Engagement and Performance in Undergraduate Nutrition Courses. Can J Diet Pract Res Publ Dietit Can Rev Can Prat Rech En Diet Une Publ Diet Can. 2016, 77(2), 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burkhart, S.J.; Taylor, J.A.; Kynn, M.; Craven, D.L.; Swanepoel, L.C. Undergraduate Students Experience of Nutrition Education Using the Flipped Classroom Approach: A Descriptive Cohort Study. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2020, 52(4), 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cárdenas, V. From the Blackboard to the Museum: Experiences with a Mixed Methodology in the Teaching of Anatomy for Nutrition Students. J. Health Care Educ. Pract. (Journal of Health Care Education in Practice VOL. 7/2). 2025, 7, 169–179. [Google Scholar]
- Texas Ten Step | TexasTenStep.org. Available online: https://texastenstep.org/ (accessed on 29 April 2025).
- Ten steps to successful breastfeeding. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/nutrition-and-food-safety/food-and-nutrition-actions-in-health-systems/ten-steps-to-successful-breastfeeding (accessed on 4 December 2023).
- Camel, S.P.; Heathman, L.; Douglas, C.C. A Comparison of Breastfeeding Exposure, Attitude, and Knowledge Between Collegiate African American and White Males with no Biological Children. Matern Child Health J. 2020, 24(7), 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychol. Health 2011, 26(9), 1113–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brockway, M.; Benzies, K.; Hayden, K.A. Interventions to Improve Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Resultant Breastfeeding Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Hum. Lact Off. J. Int. Lact Consult Assoc. 2017, 33(3), 486–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grano, C.; Fernandes, M.; Conner, M. Predicting intention and maintenance of breastfeeding up to 2-years after birth in primiparous and multiparous women. Psychol. Health 2023, 38(11), 1536–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dinour, L.M.; Shefchik, M.; Uguna, A. Correlates of Professional Breastfeeding Perceived Role, Perceived Influence, and Confidence in Providing Lactation Support Among Registered Dietitians and Registered Nurses. Dietetics 2024, 3(4), 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contento, I.R. Nutrition Education: Linking Research, Theory, and Practice; Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, S.K.; Mohammed, R.A.; Nashwan, A.J.; et al. Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. J. Med. Surg. Public Health 2025, 6, 100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heathman, L.; Douglas, C.C.; Camel, S.P. Relationship among Breastfeeding Exposure, Knowledge, and Attitudes in Collegiate Males Residing in East Texas. J. Hum. Lact Off. J. Int. Lact Consult Assoc. 2019, 35(4), 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rich, A.; Medisauskaite, A.; Potts, H.W.W.; Griffin, A. A theory-based study of doctors’ intentions to engage in professional behaviours. BMC Med. Educ. 2020, 20(1), 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Lesson # | Learning Objectives | Education Materials | Education Process and Hands-on Activity |
| 1 | Describe and present different feeding positions for breastfed infants. | MOM breast feeding trainer Breastfeeding dolls Dirty Details diapers |
Discuss breastfeeding positions. Discuss LATCH Demonstrate the MOM breastfeeding trainer with breastfeeding dolls. Allow participants to practice positions with the trainer and breastfeeding dolls. |
| 2 | Develop strategies to trouble shoot conditions that could decrease length of breastfeeding. | Common breast conditions models |
Discuss the four types of models (inverted nipple, flat nipple, mastitis, and lactating breast) and provide demonstration to achieve latch. Allow participants to repeat demonstrations with models. |
| 3 | Identify and describe stomach volume by days and weeks following the birth of an infant. |
Newborn belly beads Baby stomach flip chart |
Discuss the size difference of babies’ stomach during the first few weeks of growth. Allow participants to touch and see belly beads and stomach flip chart. |
| 4 | Identify a good flange fit. |
Flanges Breast models |
Discuss the purpose of the flange and need for correct fitting. Show video for proper flange sizing. Allow participants to measure flange sizes for breast models. |
| Counseling Skill | No gain (1) |
A little gain (2) |
Moderate gain (3) |
Good Gain (4) |
Great gain (5) |
||
| n | M (SD) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
| Remaining professional when seeing an individual’s breast | 81 | 3.98 (1.19) | 4 (4.6) | (8.0) | 13 (14.9) | 20 (23.0) | 37 (42.5) |
| Ability to hold an infant | 81 | 3.85 (1.30) | 7 (8.0) | 7 (8.0) | 11(12.6) | 22 (25.3) | 34 (39.1) |
| Ability to size proper nipple shield size for nipple sizes | 81 | 3.69 (1.27) | 4 (4.6) | 14 (16.1) | 15 (17.2) | 18 (20.7) | 30 (34.5) |
| Ability to work an electric pump | 81 | 3.69 (1.34) | 8 (9.2) | 11(12.6) | 7 (8.0) | 27(31.0) | 28 (32.2) |
| Ability to work a breast pump (manual) | 80 | 3.73 (1.32) | 6 (6.9) | 13 (14.9) | 8 (9.2) | 23 (26.4) | 30(34.5) |
| Ability to hold or show an infant in different nursing positions | 80 | 4.00 (1.02) | 2 (2.3) | 5 (5.7) | 14 (16.1) | 29 (33.3) | 30 (34.5) |
| Ability to acknowledge a good latch versus a bad latch | 81 | 3.64 (1.21) | 3 (3.4) | 15 (17.2) | 15 (17.2) | 23 (26.43) | 25 (24.49) |
| Understanding of types of infant stool | 81 | 4.01 (1.04) | 2 (2.3) | 6 (6.9) | 13 (14.9) | 28 (32.2) | 32 (36.8) |
| Ability to pour and store breastmilk correctly | 81 | 3.93 (1.08) | 3 (3.4) | 7 (8.0) | 11 (12.6) | 32 (36.8) | 28 (32.2) |
| Correct positioning of the bottle when bottle feeding an infant with breastmilk | 80 | 4.03 (1.04) | 3 (3.4) | 3 (3.4) | 15 (17.2) | 27 (31.0) | 32 (36.8) |
| Ability to demonstrate infant stomach size | 81 | 4.21 (0.90) | 2 (2.3) | 1 (1.1) | 11 (12.6) | 31 (35.6) | 36 (41.4) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).