Since the calculation of the reflection coefficient is based on frequency-domain acoustic pressure signals, the spectral characteristics of the pressure directly affect the stability and reliability of the results. When the pressure amplitude at a certain frequency is too low, the signal-to-noise ratio becomes poor, which may lead to phase distortion and consequently introduce significant errors in the calculated reflection coefficient.
Therefore, prior to the reflection coefficient analysis, the spectral characteristics of the acoustic pressure signals under different operating conditions are first examined in order to identify the dominant frequency bands and principal spectral components of the system.
3.1. Frequency-Domain Analysis
During the data processing procedure, the raw acoustic pressure signals were affected by background noise from the experimental system. In particular, the frequency components around 50 Hz were significantly contaminated by electromagnetic interference originating from upstream electrical equipment operating at the power-line frequency, leading to an abnormal increase in local spectral amplitudes. Therefore, this frequency band was excluded from subsequent analysis.
Since this experiment employs a self-excited acoustic source, in which acoustic waves generated by the combustor are used to determine the reflection coefficients of the inlet and outlet perforated plates, frequency-domain analysis of the acoustic signals is essential. As shown in
Figure 5, each operating condition exhibits one or several dominant frequency components with relatively high acoustic pressure amplitudes. These frequency regions are considered to have a higher signal-to-noise ratio, and the corresponding reflection coefficient results are therefore expected to be more reliable and are selected for detailed analysis.
Figure 6(a) presents the variation of dominant frequencies under different operating conditions. It can be observed that the dominant frequency does not increase monotonically with inlet pressure, but is instead influenced by multiple factors, including inlet pressure, temperature, air mass flow rate, and combustion conditions. Among them, the medium-pressure cases exhibit relatively higher dominant frequencies, while a decrease is observed under high-pressure conditions, indicating that the dominant acoustic modes of the combustor are adjusted with changing operating parameters.
Overall, the dominant frequencies change to some extent before and after the installation of the perforated plates, suggesting that modifications to the inlet and outlet acoustic boundary conditions have a measurable impact on the overall acoustic field of the combustor.
Figure 6(b) compares the peak acoustic pressure amplitudes corresponding to the dominant frequencies with and without perforated plates for all operating conditions. In general, the peak amplitudes decrease after the installation of the perforated plates, indicating that the modified inlet and outlet acoustic boundary conditions introduce additional acoustic energy dissipation during wave propagation, thereby attenuating the combustor acoustic response. This demonstrates that the perforated plates not only reproduce the impedance characteristics of blade-row boundaries but also provide a certain degree of acoustic damping, laying the foundation for subsequent reflection coefficient analysis.
3.2. Reflection Coefficients under Different Operating Conditions
After preprocessing to eliminate the 50 Hz power-line interference and low signal-to-noise-ratio frequency components, the acoustic reflection coefficients at the combustor inlet and outlet were determined over the frequency range of 0–1000 Hz using the two-microphone method and compared with the corresponding numerical results. The numerical reflection coefficients were obtained from three-dimensional acoustic simulations of the perforated plates with the corresponding geometries, in which the experimentally measured operating parameters under each test condition were prescribed as boundary conditions. Particular attention was paid to the reflection coefficients around the dominant frequencies associated with high sound pressure amplitudes. As shown, the reflection coefficients of the perforated plates increase with frequency under all operating conditions. This behavior is mainly attributed to the increase in acoustic inertial impedance with frequency. Moreover, low-frequency acoustic waves possess longer wavelengths and therefore exhibit stronger transmission through the perforated plates. As the frequency increases, the acoustic transmission capability gradually weakens, resulting in enhanced sound reflection and consequently higher reflection coefficients.
Figure 7 compares the experimental and numerical acoustic reflection coefficients at the combustor inlet and outlet under low-pressure operating conditions (281–309 kPa). Under condition B1, relatively high reflection coefficients are observed over the entire frequency range at both the inlet and outlet, and are consistently higher than those under condition B2, indicating that the acoustic response is more sensitive to variations in boundary impedance under low-pressure conditions. With a slight increase in inlet pressure, temperature, and excess air ratio, the overall reflection coefficients under condition B2 decrease while maintaining a frequency-dependent trend similar to that of B1, suggesting a reduction in the degree of boundary impedance mismatch.
A comparison between the two operating conditions further reveals that condition B1, with a lower excess air ratio of 3.74, exhibits stronger combustion heat-release fluctuations, resulting in noticeable discrepancies between the experimental and numerical reflection coefficients below 200 Hz. These deviations are mainly attributed to local acoustic disturbances induced by the coupling between unsteady vortex shedding and combustion oscillations under low-pressure and low-flow-velocity conditions. In contrast, condition B2, with a higher excess air ratio of 4.34, exhibits improved combustion stability and weaker heat-release fluctuations, leading to significantly better agreement between the experimental and numerical results. This indicates that, under low-pressure conditions, the acoustic boundary is highly sensitive to the excess air ratio, and even slight variations in the combustion state can be reflected in the experimentally measured reflection coefficients.
Furthermore, under low-flow-velocity conditions, the inertial effect of the jet flow inside the perforations remains relatively weak, resulting in a less pronounced acoustic added-mass effect of the perforated plate. Consequently, low-frequency acoustic waves can be transmitted more readily through the perforations, leading to experimentally measured reflection coefficients that are lower than the numerical predictions in the low-frequency range. In addition, the relatively small acoustic impedance discontinuity across the perforated plate under low-pressure conditions limits the reflection of mid- and high-frequency acoustic waves. As a result, the reflection coefficient increases only gradually with frequency, while the proportion of acoustic energy contained in the mid- and high-frequency range remains comparatively low.
As the operating condition enters the intermediate pressure range (546–596 kPa), the comparison between the experimental and numerical reflection coefficients is presented in
Figure 8. Under condition B3 (546 kPa), the acoustic reflection coefficients at both the combustor inlet and outlet increase progressively with frequency, while the outlet reflection coefficients remain slightly higher than those at the inlet over the entire frequency range. This indicates that the acoustic boundary impedance represented by the outlet perforated plate is still greater than that of the inlet plate. Overall, good agreement is achieved between the experimental measurements and numerical predictions, with only minor discrepancies observed at a few discrete frequencies. Owing to the relatively high excess air ratio of 4.52, combustion remains stable under condition B3, resulting in smooth reflection-coefficient curves. This suggests that the acoustic field is still primarily governed by the boundary impedance, whereas the influence of unsteady combustion on the acoustic response remains limited.
Under condition B4 (596 kPa), the inlet pressure increases by approximately 9% relative to B3, while the inlet temperature rises from 455 K to 554 K. The combined effects of elevated pressure and temperature increase the acoustic impedance difference across the perforated plate, thereby enhancing the boundary impedance mismatch and leading to higher reflection coefficients, particularly in the mid- and high-frequency ranges. Compared with B3, the higher outlet reflection coefficients become more pronounced, indicating that the acoustic impedance discontinuity across the perforated plate is further strengthened under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions. Although the excess air ratio decreases to 3.65 under condition B4, the experimental results remain in good agreement with the numerical predictions, demonstrating that the perforated-plate boundary model can accurately represent the actual acoustic boundary characteristics within this pressure range.
A comparison of conditions B3 and B4 indicates that, within the intermediate pressure range, the variation in reflection coefficient is primarily governed by changes in the characteristic acoustic impedance of the working medium. As the pressure and temperature increase, the reflective capability of the perforated-plate boundary is gradually enhanced, as evidenced by the overall increase in reflection coefficient and the more rapid growth in the mid- and high-frequency regions. Furthermore, the close agreement between the experimental and numerical results throughout this pressure range indicates that the system response remains predominantly linear, allowing the equivalent perforated-plate boundary to accurately reproduce the acoustic characteristics at the combustor inlet and outlet. As the operating pressure increases further, the predictive accuracy of the numerical model exhibits a continuing improvement.
Figure 9 demonstrates that under high-pressure operating conditions (707–856 kPa), the acoustic reflection coefficients at both the combustor inlet and outlet remain elevated, with the outlet consistently exhibiting stronger boundary impedance than the inlet. While the reflection-coefficient curves exhibit an upward shift compared to low- and intermediate-pressure regimes, the variation among conditions B5–B7 is non-monotonic. This observation confirms that reflection characteristics are governed by the coupled effects of pressure, temperature, mass flow rate, and combustion state, rather than pressure alone.
The physical mechanisms underlying this behavior are evident in the comparison of conditions. Under condition B5, The system exhibits smooth, frequency-dependent reflection characteristics, with numerical predictions showing excellent agreement with experimental data, validating the perforated-plate model under stable combustion conditions (excess air ratio: 5.12; inlet temperature: 554 K). Under condition B6 (the local minimum), Despite higher nominal pressure than B5, the reflection coefficient decreases. This is attributed to more intense combustion (excess air ratio: 3.95), which significantly reduces local gas density and increases the through-flow velocity (Mach number). Consequently, enhanced flow separation, vortex shedding, and shear-layer dissipation at the perforations increase acoustic resistance, effectively weakening the acoustic impedance mismatch and offsetting the reflection increase typically associated with higher pressure. Under condition B7, As pressure reaches the study’s maximum, increased gas density re-establishes the dominance of the acoustic impedance mismatch, causing the reflection coefficient to rise again.
Overall, these findings reveal that while higher pressure generally enhances acoustic reflection by increasing characteristic acoustic impedance, high-flow-velocity effects and unsteady combustion interactions introduce significant flow–acoustic coupling. Despite localized fluctuations observed in high-pressure regimes, the sustained consistency between experimental measurements and numerical predictions confirms the robustness and continued engineering applicability of the equivalent perforated-plate boundary model.