Submitted:
15 July 2026
Posted:
17 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Protein Sequence Retrieval
2.2. Epitope Prediction Using Immunoinformatic Tools
2.2.1. Linear B-Cell Epitopes
2.2.2. Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte (CTL)
2.2.3. Helper T Lymphocyte (HTL)
2.2.4. Epitope Screening and Conservancy Analysis
2.3. Multi-Epitope Vaccine Construct Design
2.4. Physicochemical Properties Analysis
2.5. Secondary Structure Prediction
2.6. Three-Dimensional Structure Prediction, Refinement and Validation
2.7. Molecular Docking with TLRs
2.8. Molecular Dynamics Simulation
2.9. In-Silico Codon Optimization and Cloning
2.10. Host-Immune System Simulation
3. Results
3.1. Proteins Sequence Retrieval
3.2. B-Cell Epitope Prediction
3.3. Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte (CTL) Epitope Prediction
3.4. Helper T-Lymphocyte (HTL) Epitope Prediction
3.5. Selection of Epitopes for Vaccine Construction
| NCBI Accession no. | Nature | Origin/ Country |
Genome Size (bp) |
Host Organism | NCBI Accession Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KU746335 | Least Pathogenic | Mexico | 44,326 | Chicken | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KU746335 |
| KU310942 | Pathogenic | Canada | 44,377 | Avian | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KU310942 |
| MN428137 | Pathogenic | Pakistan | 43,840 | Chicken | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN428137 |
3.6. Construction of the Multi Epitope Vaccine Candidate
3.7. Physicochemical Properties of the Vaccine Construct
3.8. Secondary Structure Prediction
3.9. Tertiary Structure Prediction, Refinement, and Validation
3.10. Molecular Docking Analysis
3.11. Molecular Dynamics Simulation
3.12. Immune Simulation
3.13. Codon Optimization and In-Silico Cloning
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- FS, N. Strategic role of poultry production sciences in shaping the future of global food security and strengthen sustainability. Poult. Sci. 2026, 106617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FS, A.A.N.; AM, A.A. Challenges of ensuring sustainable poultry meat production and economic resilience under climate change for achieving sustainable food security. 2025, 6(1), 159–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MB, S.; BR, M. The economic impact of some important viral diseases affecting the poultry industry in Abuja, Nigeria. Sokoto J. Vet. Sci. 2017, 15(2), 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- M M, B. G.; D L, M. H. The outcome of experimentally induced inclusion body hepatitis (IBH) by fowl aviadenoviruses (FAdVs) is crucially influenced by the genetic background of the host. Vet. Res. 2016, 47(1), 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arabbaghi, F.; Allymehr, M.; Ghalyanchi Langeroudi, A.; Talebi, A. Comparison of Penton and Hexon genes of fowl adenovirus serotype 11 in molecular detection of IBH in broilers. Arch. Razi Inst. 2023, 78(3), 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NA E-S, HS E-H, MF E, HF E, AR E, AR G, et al. Epidemiology, pathology, prevention, and control strategies of inclusion body hepatitis and hepatitis-hydropericardium syndrome in poultry: A comprehensive review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 963199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qiao, Q.; Xu, M.; Wang, X.; Tian, J.; Zhang, Y.; Song, C.; et al. Genomic characterization and pathogenicity of a novel fowl adenovirus serotype 11 isolated from chickens with inclusion body hepatitis in China. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103(5), 103642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chitradevi, S.; Sukumar, K.; Suresh, P.; Balasubramaniam, G.; Kannan, D. Molecular typing and pathogenicity assessment of fowl adenovirus associated with inclusion body hepatitis in chicken from India. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53(4), 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schachner, A.; Matos, M.; Grafl, B.; Hess, M. Fowl adenovirus-induced diseases and strategies for their control–a review on the current global situation. Avian Pathol. 2018, 47(2), 111–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EB, B.; HC, K.F.; AL dOC, J.A. W.; RA, A. F.C. Fowl aviadenovirus (FAdV-11) as the causative agent of a vertical outbreak of inclusion body hepatitis in commercial broiler breeders in Brazil. The Microbe 2024, 3, 100102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AE, et al. Complete genome sequence of a non-pathogenic strain of Fowl Adenovirus serotype 11: Minimal genomic differences between pathogenic and non-pathogenic viruses. Virology 2017, 501, 63–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EA S, I E, SE A-R, A H, HM EN, MA G, et al. Pathogenicity and genotyping of fowl Adenovirus-D serotype 2/11 circulating in commercial broilers in Egypt. Viruses 2026, 18(2), 252. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- VG, C.; SP, A.; MB, K.; SG, C.; RC, K.; AA, A. Molecular phylodynamics of fowl adenovirus serotype 11 and 8b from inclusion body hepatitis outbreaks. Virus Genes. 2023, 59(1), 148–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- H, H.; AG, L.; MH, F.; ZZ, K.; RE, D.; SA, G.; et al. The fowl adenovirus (Fadv-11) outbreak in Iranian broiler chicken farms: The first full genome characterization and phylogenetic analysis. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 101365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Q Q, P Y, J L, Y L, X L, L Q, et al. Research Note: Rapid generation of a novel fowl adenovirus serotype 11 reverse genetic platform. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103(6), 103745. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NM, S.; M, H.-B. A recent perspective on fiber and hexon genes proteins analyses of fowl adenovirus toward virus infectivity—a review. Open Vet. J. 2021, 11(4), 569–80-–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- F, A.; A, M. A.; A T., G.L. Comparison of Penton and Hexon genes of fowl adenovirus serotype 11 in molecular detection of IBH in broilers. Arch. Razi Inst. 2023, 78(3), 873. Available online: https://archrazi.areeo.ac.ir/.
- SP M, D V, C G, D S, MC H. Systems approach to design multi-epitopic peptide vaccine candidate against fowl adenovirus structural proteins for Gallus gallus domesticus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1351303. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- S A, M M, S D, J B, K Z, F K. Pathogenicity of field strain of fowl aviadenovirus serotype 11 isolated from chickens with inclusion body hepatitis in Morocco. PLoS ONE 2021, 16(12), e0261284. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D Y, M X, K Y, X X, S G, J T, et al.Molecular characterization and pathogenicity of highly pathogenic fowl adenovirus serotype 4 isolated from laying flock with hydropericardium-hepatitis syndrome. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 147, 104381. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MM I, MM N, MR I, MS I, SA S, M I, et al. Fowl Adenovirus Infections: A Comprehensive Review of Prevalence, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Control, and Economic Impact. Poult. Sci. 2026, 106565. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- B G, P M, E W, J Z, I B, C H, et al. Inclusion body hepatitis (IBH) outbreaks following vertical transmission of fowl adenovirus serotype 11 (FAdV-11), species D: a strain with regional persistence and global presence. Poultry 2026, 5(2), 25. [CrossRef]
- C DL, M H. Vaccination strategies to protect chickens from fowl adenovirus (FAdV)-induced diseases: A comprehensive review. Vaccines 2025, 43, 126496. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, A.; Popowich, S.; Ojkic, D.; Kurukulasuriya, S.; Chow-Lockerbie, B.; Gunawardana, T.; et al. Inactivated and live bivalent fowl adenovirus (FAdV8b+ FAdV11) breeder vaccines provide broad-spectrum protection in chicks against inclusion body hepatitis (IBH). Vaccines 2018, 36(5), 744–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- S T, MA S, TA A, R U, A S, F I, et al. Highly soluble and stable ‘insertion domain’of the capsid penton base protein provides complete protection against infections caused by fowl adenoviruses. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 173, 105835. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- X W, Q T, Z C, P W, C L, Y Z, et al. Immune protection efficacy of FAdV-4 surface proteins fiber-1, fiber-2, hexon and penton base. Virus Res. 2018, 245, 1–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- P, Y.; M, X.; M, X.; Y, Z.; L, Q.; M, X.; et al. Fiber-2, not Fiber-1, is the principal protective immunogen of fowl adenovirus serotype 4: insights from a comparative efficacy study of chimeric virus-based inactivated vaccines. Poult. Sci. 2026, 106634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- A S, C DL, S H, M H. Recombinantly expressed chimeric fibers demonstrate discrete type-specific neutralizing epitopes in the Fowl aviadenovirus E (FAdV-E) fiber, promoting the optimization of FAdV fiber subunit vaccines towards cross-protection in vivo. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10(1), e02123-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- C Z, P Y, J Z, X L, Y H, C W. Advances and Prospects of Fowl Adenoviruses Vaccine Technologies in the Past Decade. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6434. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, C.; Yang, P.; Zhou, J.; Liu, X.; Huang, Y.; Wan, C. Advances and Prospects of Fowl Adenoviruses Vaccine Technologies in the Past Decade. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- FE. I, MN S, H M, M I, YA E-S, SA A, et al. Preparation and Serological Evaluation of an Inactivated Trivalent Oil Emulsion Vaccine for Avian Fowl Adenovirus (FAdV) Containing− 8a, 8b, and 11 Serotypes. Curr. Microbiol. 2026, 83(3), 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- B, M.; NA F., A. M. Multi-epitope vaccines, from design to expression; an in silico approach. Hum. Immunol. 2024, 85(3), 110804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AC, B.; SdS, A.; B, P.S.; MF, D.; LdS, M. Computational Methods in Immunoinformatics: Epitope discovery and diagnostic applications. ACS Omega 2025, 10(39), 44816–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MM S, AR S, SK H, TA A, MN S, SR S, et al. Advances in computational and bioinformatics tools and databases for designing and developing a multi-epitope-based peptide vaccine. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2023, 29(4), 60. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- J W, I Z, MK S, X Q, Y G, H C, et al. The first complete genome sequence and pathogenicity characterization of fowl adenovirus 11 from chickens with inclusion body hepatitis in Pakistan. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 244, 108670. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- PD S, JG A, AM K, RA K, PJ K, É N. Molecular characterization of pathogenic and nonpathogenic fowl aviadenovirus serotype 11 isolates. Can. J. Microbiol. 2016, 62(12), 993–1002. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- F S, DG H. Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences. Protein Sci. 2018, 27(1), 135–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Q Q, M X, X W, J T, Y Z, C S, et al. Genomic characterization and pathogenicity of a novel fowl adenovirus serotype 11 isolated from chickens with inclusion body hepatitis in China. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103(5), 103642. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- L P, M B, LB P. An introduction to B-cell epitope mapping and in silico epitope prediction. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 2016(1), 6760830. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- S S, GP R. Prediction of continuous B-cell epitopes in an antigen using recurrent neural network. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2006, 65(1), 40–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- JN C, MH H, S D, B P, M N, P M. BepiPred-3.0: Improved B-cell epitope prediction using protein language models. Protein Sci. 2022, 31(12), e4497. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Y H, D. K. Deep convolutional neural networks for pan-specific peptide-MHC class I binding prediction. BMC Bioinform. 2017, 18(1), 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- V J, S P, M A, P M, B P, M N. NetMHCpan-4.0: improved peptide–MHC class I interaction predictions integrating eluted ligand and peptide binding affinity data. J. Immunol. 2017, 199(9), 3360–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- S T, R G, J K, A H, C F, R B, et al. Discovery of immunodominant T-cell epitopes reveals penton protein as a second immunodominant target in human adenovirus infection. J. Transl. Med. 2016, 14(1), 286. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- M A, T T, Z Y, JA G, B P, M N. An automated benchmarking platform for MHC class II binding prediction methods. Bioinformatics 2018, 34(9), 1522–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- A K, YF M, L C-S, DH B, KM D. Measuring antiviral capacity of T cell responses to adenovirus. J. Immunol. 2019, 202(2), 618–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- N Z, I. D.; D F, I. D. Immunogenicity prediction by VaxiJen: a ten year overview. J. Proteom. Bioinform. 2017, 10(11), 10–4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R H, T Y, MI H, AN N. In silico identification of potential epitopes present in human adenovirus proteins for vaccine design and of putative drugs for treatment against viral infection. J. Immunol. Methods 2018, 455, 55–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- I D, I. B.; F, I. D. AllerTOP v. 2—a server for in silico prediction of allergens. J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20(6), 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AS R, S C, A A, P T, GP R. ToxinPred 3.0: An improved method for predicting the toxicity of peptides. Comput. Biol. Med. 2024, 179, 108926. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SO E, NA M, YA A. Immunoinformatics, molecular docking and dynamics simulation approaches unveil a multi epitope-based potent peptide vaccine candidate against avian leukosis virus. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14(1), 2870. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Q L, M. W.; Y W, F. P. Design of a multi-epitope vaccine against goatpox virus using an immunoinformatics approach. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 13, 1309096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SP, M.; H, M.C. A computational reverse vaccinology approach for the design and development of multi-epitopic vaccine against avian pathogen mycoplasma gallisepticum. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 721061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- H T, S R, J Z, E J, S A. Designing a multi-epitope vaccine to provoke the robust immune response against influenza A H7N9. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11(1), 24485. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- P P, K S, A R, S S, P S, K R, et al. Design of a Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate Against Infectious Laryngotracheitis Virus Affecting Poultry by Computational Approaches. Biology 2025, 14(7), 765. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- K A, S. P. Evaluation of in silico protein secondary structure prediction methods by employing statistical techniques. Biomed. Biotechnol. Res. J. 2017, 1(1), 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DW B, L M, A L, SM K, DT J. Deep learning for the PSIPRED protein analysis workbench. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52(W1), W287–W93. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- X Z, W Z, Y L, R P, C Z, EW B, et al. I-TASSER-MTD: a deep-learning-based platform for multi-domain protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 2022, 17(10), 2326–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- L H, H P, C S. GalaxyRefine: Protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41(W1), W384–W8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- K O, B M, A K, Č V. Comparative analysis of methods for evaluation of protein models against native structures. Bioinformatics 2019, 35(6), 937–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SK B, R B, C B, C B, A B, P B, et al. Updated resources for exploring experimentally-determined PDB structures and Computed Structure Models at the RCSB Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53(D1), D564–D74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EF P, TD G, CC H, GS C, DM G, EC M, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25(13), 1605–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D, K.; DR, H.; B, X.; KA, P.; D, P.; C, Y.; et al. The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12(2), 255–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SR C, DW G, S V, CJ C. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(1), 45–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- RA L, J J, L P, RS V, JM T. PDBsum: Structural summaries of PDB entries. Protein Sci. 2018, 27(1), 129–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- A G, K H, M S, R M, B N, DC H, et al. JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (suppl_2), W526–W31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- A M, G. R.; GA PP, F. P. In silico design of recombinant multi-epitope vaccine against influenza A virus. BMC Bioinform. 2021, 22 (Suppl 14), 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- SJ vB, AJ B, A K-K, D S, G C, HC P, et al. A reverse genetics system for avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus based on targeted RNA recombination. Virol. J. 2017, 14(1), 109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- CC G, MC S, SH C, LR S, RM K. Integrating bioinformatics tools into inquiry-based molecular biology laboratory education modules. Front. Educ. 2021, 6, 711403. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- N R, O L, F C. Immune system simulation online. Bioinformatics 2011, 27(14), 2013–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Protein type | Sequence | Score | VaxiJen | AllerTop | ToxinPred |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber | SGGGGGGSGGNPSLNP | 0.95 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin |
| NGSIGSSSNGIAVVTD | 0.9 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| QSTFVNMTCYNFRCQN | 0.79 | Immunogen (100%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| DGLDIAVDPSTLEVDD | 0.7 | Immunogen (100%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| NSSNYKFNCAYFLQSW | 0.56 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| DDLNLVYPFWLQNSTS | 0.53 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| Penton | RSWLIAYNQSGSPANE | 0.89 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin |
| PDTFVAPTGFKEDNTT | 0.88 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| EILKQAPPINVSAVCD | 0.87 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| EGRQNNVQRSDIGVKF | 0.82 | Immunogen (100%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| GVVQIYLKEGRQNNVQ | 0.78 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| YNVIYDSNNRPVTAYR | 0.74 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| YEDLEGGNVPALLDVE | 0.68 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| DSAADDTSELFVPVQR | 0.67 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| GYHPDVVLLPGCAVDF | 0.67 | Immunogen (66%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin | |
| TVIHNQDLDPATAATE | 0.63 | Immunogen (100%) | Non-allergen | Non-toxin |
| Protein type | Epitope Sequence | Allele | Score | Percentile Rank | Aller-TOP | VaxiJen | Toxin-Pred |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber | AVDPSTLEV | HLA-A*02:01 | 0.87496 | 0.05 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) |
Non-toxin |
| TPTITPSSV | HLA-B*07:02 | 0.706462 | 0.12 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin | |
| EVENKSLAL | HLA-B*08:01 | 0.462583 | 0.18 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) |
Non-toxin | |
| VPTYESMNL | HLA-B*07:02 | 0.546975 | 0.21 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) |
Non-toxin | |
| SSLYLKINR | HLA-A*11:01 | 0.40446 | 0.42 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) |
Non-toxin | |
| Penton |
GVYFASTEK | HLA-A*11:01 | 0.920846 | 0.01 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) | Non-toxin |
| SPRRARSVA | HLA-B*07:02 | 0.918799 | 0.04 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin | |
| INITRFQTL | HLA-B*08:01 | 0.740901 | 0.05 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin | |
| HLMSFPQSA | HLA-A*02:01 | 0.798454 | 0.08 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin | |
| VVFLHVTYV | HLA-A*02:01 | 0.74167 | 0.11 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) | Non-toxin | |
| YQPYRVVVL | HLA-B*08:01 | 0.570928 | 0.11 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin | |
| FIAGLIAIV | HLA-A*02:01 | 0.641405 | 0.17 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) | Non -toxin | |
| TLADAGFIK | HLA-A*11:01 | 0.639216 | 0.18 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin | |
| GLTVLPPLL | HLA-A*02:01 | 0.622173 | 0.18 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) | Non-toxin |
| Protein type | Epitope Sequence | Allele | Score | Percentile Rank | Aller-TOP | VaxiJen | Toxin-Pred |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber | GLDIAVDPSTLEVDD | HLA-DRB1*04:01 | 0.804244 | 0.68 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) |
Non-toxic |
| ELGVHLNPNGPITAD | HLA-DRB1*15:01 | 0.354772 | 3.9 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) |
Non-toxic | |
| ELGVHLNPNGPITAD | HLA-DRB1*07:01 | 0.252852 | 6.9 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) |
Non-toxic | |
| NGSIGSSSNGIAVVT | HLA-DRB1*04:01 | 0.273118 | 7 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) |
Non-toxic | |
| Penton | VDQDVIELADAKPLLK | HLA-DRB1*09:01 | 0.810958 | 0.2 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) | Non-toxin |
| AYRSWLIAYNQSGSPA | HLA-DRB1*04:01 | 0.875289 | 0.3 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin | |
| VDQDVIELADAKPLLK | HLA-DRB1*07:01 | 0.724949 | 0.88 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) | Non-toxin |
|
| VDQDVIELADAKPLLK | HLA-DRB1*01:01 | 0.795971 | 1.1 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (100%) | Non-toxin |
|
| IITYEDLEGGNVPALL | HLA-DRB1*01:01 | 0.738836 | 1.3 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin |
|
| DIDTFNPEANHSNFRT | HLA-DRB1*04:01 | 0.660108 | 1.6 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin |
|
| HPDVVLLPGCAVDFTY | HLA-DRB1*01:01 | 0.668346 | 1.9 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin |
|
| AYRSWLIAYNQSGSPA | HLA-DRB1*01:01 | 0.514877 | 3.1 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin |
|
| GVVQIYLKEGRQNNVQ | HLA-DRB1*11:01 | 0.521617 | 3.5 | Non-allergen | Immunogen (66%) | Non-toxin |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).