Submitted:
13 July 2026
Posted:
15 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Sustainable Event Management
2.2. Visitor Satisfaction
2.3. Visitor Satisfaction as an Indicator of Sustainability
2.4. Formulation of hypotheses
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Background of the Study
3.2. Research Design
3.3. Population and Sample
3.4. Data Collection Tool
3.5. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Sociodemographic Profile of the Sample
4.2. Descriptive Statistics
3.3. Exploratory Factor Analysis
3.3. Confirmatory factor analysis
3.4. Hypothesis Testing
5. Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chiya, A. The Role of Rural Music Festivals in Community Resilience, Resourcefulness, and Well-Being. Int. J. Sustain. Econ. Soc. Cult. Context 2024, 21, 25–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maguire, K.; McLoughlin, E. An Evidence Informed Approach to Planning for Event Management in Ireland: An Examination of the European Tourism Indicator System. J. Place Manag. Dev. 2020, 13, 47–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.; Kim, M.J.; Chung, N.; Olya, H. Promoting Sustainable Events Engagement: A Cross-Country Analysis. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2025, 1–18. [CrossRef]
- Janeczko, Ben.; Mules, T.J.; Ritchie, Brent. Estimating the Economic Impacts of Festivals and Events : A Research Guide; Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd.; CRC for Sustainable Tourism, 2002; ISSN 1876685352. [Google Scholar]
- Menezes, A.; Lima, R.M.; Aquere, A.L.; Amorim, M. An Adaptation of Servqual for Events Evaluation: An Environmental Sustainability Addon. Sustainability 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higgins-Desbiolles, F.; Monga, M. Transformative Change through Events Business: A Feminist Ethic of Care Analysis of Building the Purpose Economy. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 1989–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feirud, L. Introducing a Holistic Four-Stage Model of Sustainable Festival Management. In Services, Experiences, and Sustainability; Routledge, 2026; pp. 127–141. [Google Scholar]
- Collins, A.; Potoglou, D. Factors Influencing Visitor Travel to Festivals: Challenges in Encouraging Sustainable Travel. J. Sustain. Tour. 2019, 27, 668–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkington, J. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business; Capstone: Oxford, 1997; ISBN 1-900961-27-X. [Google Scholar]
- Mair, J.; Jago, L. The Development of a Conceptual Model of Greening in the Business Events Tourism Sector. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Routledge (Ed.) Getz & Page Event Studies; Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events, Fourth edition.; New York, 2020; ISBN 9780367085629. [Google Scholar]
- Suvittawat, A.; Janchai, N.; Seepho, S.; Nonthachai, J.; Nonthachai, I. Sustainable Food Festival Tourism: Integrating the Bio-Circular-Green (BCG) Model for Cultural and Environmental Resilience in Thailand. Sustainability 2025, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laing, J.; Frost, W. How Green Was My Festival: Exploring Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Staging Green Events. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 29, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, J. Rethinking Event Sustainability. A Research Agenda for Event Management; Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019; ISBN 9781788114356. [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, R.L. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1980, 17, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, Y.S.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, C.K. Measuring Festival Quality and Value Affecting Visitors’ Satisfaction and Loyalty Using a Structural Approach. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 29, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A.; Berry, L.L.; Parasuraman, A. The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. J. Mark. 1996, 60, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, S.T.; Illum, S.F. Examining the Mediating Role of Festival Visitors’ Satisfaction in the Relationship between Service Quality and Behavioral Intentions. J. Vacat. Mark. 2006, 12, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.K.; Lee, C.K.; Lee, S.K.; Babin, B.J. Festivalscapes and Patrons’ Emotions, Satisfaction, and Loyalty. J. Bus. Res. 2008, 61, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, C.G.Q.; Qu, H. Examining the Structural Relationships of Destination Image, Tourist Satisfaction and Destination Loyalty: An Integrated Approach. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 624–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, S.T.; Chancellor, H.C. Examining the Festival Attributes That Impact Visitor Experience, Satisfaction and Re-Visit Intention. J. Vacat. Mark. 2009, 15, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theodorakis, N.D.; Alexandris, K.; Tsigilis, N.; Karvounis, S. Predicting Spectators’ Behavioural Intentions in Professional Football: The Role of Satisfaction and Service Quality. Sport Manag. Rev. 2013, 16, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armbrecht, J. Event Quality, Perceived Value, Satisfaction and Behavioural Intentions in an Event Context. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2021, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altschwager, T.; Conduit, J.; Karpen, I.O.; Goodman, S. Event Engagement: Using Event Experiences to Build Brands. Australas. Mark. J. 2024, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parasuraman, A.; Z.V.A., B.L.L. SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. J. Retail. 1988, 64, 12–40. [Google Scholar]
- Pine, B.; Gilmore, J. The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre and Every Business a Stage; Harvard Business School Press, 1999; pp. 45–67. [Google Scholar]
- Walls, A.; Okumus, F.; Wang, Y.; Kwun, D.J.W. Understanding the Consumer Experience: An Exploratory Study of Luxury Hotels. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2011, 20, 166–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crompton, J.L.; McKay John Howard Society, S.L. Motives of Visitors Attending Festival Events; 1997; Vol. 24, pp. 425–435. [Google Scholar]
- Mason, M.C.; Paggiaro, A. Investigating the Role of Festivalscape in Culinary Tourism: The Case of Food and Wine Events. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 1329–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pai, C.K.; Lee, T.; Kang, S. Examining the Role of Service Quality, Perceived Values, and Trust in Macau Food Festival. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacinto, M.; Margarido, C.; Sousa, M.; Marques, J.; Varela, J.; Amaro, N.; Morquecho Sánchez, R.; Couto, N.; Matos, R.; Monteiro, D.; et al. Perceived Quality, Overall Service Quality, Overall Service Satisfaction, Perceived Service Value and Future Intentions of a Sport Event: Portuguese Triathlete Perceptions 2025, Vol. 25, 14–29.
- Buhalis, D. Marketing the Competitive Destination of the Future. Tour. Manag. 2000, 21, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibbeson, C.; Westwood, C. Agricultural Shows: Connecting People, Place and Emotions. J. Rural Stud. 2025, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, D.A.; Crompton, J.L. Quality, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions. Ann. Tour. Res. 2000, 27, 785–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westwood, C.; Schofield, P.; Berridge, G. Agricultural Shows: Visitor Motivation, Experience and Behavioural Intention. Int. J. Event Festiv. Manag. 2018, 9, 147–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busick, B.; Leggette, H.; Briers, G.E.; Whitaker, H.; Parrella, J.A. Great Yorkshire Livestock Show Attendees’ Attitudes about Agriculture. J. Appl. Commun. 2023, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosworth, G.; Price, L.; Ardley, B.; Westwood, C. Examining the Need for Organizational Learning and Entrepreneurialism to Meet the Changing Roles and Expectations of Rural and Agricultural Shows in the UK. J. Rural Stud. 2024, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosworth, G.; Ardley, B.; Gerlach, S. Innovation in Agricultural and County Shows: Conceptualising the e-Eventscape. Int. J. Event Festiv. Manag. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, J.; Smith, A. Events and Sustainability: Why Making Events More Sustainable Is Not Enough. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gobierno Provincial de Manabí Portoviejo June 20, 2026. Available online: https://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/ecuador/chone-espera-recibir-a-200000-visitantes-y-mover-10-millones-en-el-expocebu-nota/.
- Redacción El Universo. Chone June 20 2026, El Universo Programa EbA LAC en Ecuador participa con stand en feria ExpoCebú Chone 2024.
- Programa Escalando Medidas de Adaptación basada en Ecosistemas en América Latina (EbA LAC). Available online: https://ebalac.com/es/noticias/56-noticias/434-programa-eba-lac-en-ecuador-participa-con-stand-en-feria-expocebu-chone-2024 (accessed on 20 June 2026).
- Zambrano, L. Expreso. Chone October 24 2024. Available online: https://www.expreso.ec/actualidad/economia/manabi-encuentro-internacional-jueces-razas-cebu-expocebu-218018.
- da Silva Filho, J.A.; Santos, F.R.N. The Practice of the Auction as an Efficient Market Proposal for the Cattle Fair: The Case of Alagoas. Rev. De Econ. E Sociol. Rural 2020, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genovese, D.; Culasso, F.; Giacosa, E.; Battaglini, L.M. Can Livestock Farming and Tourism Coexist in Mountain Regions? A New Business Model for Sustainability. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.T.; Bentler, P.M. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling; Guilford Press., 2016; ISBN 978-1-4625-2335-1. [Google Scholar]
- Byrne, B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS : Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming; Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2016; ISBN 9781138797031. [Google Scholar]
- Gaskin, J.; Lim, J. “Model Fit Measures”, AMOS Plugin. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doral Fábregas, F.; R.A.I., A.M.A. Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales En Investigaciones de Ciencias Sociales: Experiencia de Uso En Facebook. Rev. Cienc. Soc. 2018, XXIV, 22–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Municipal del cantón Chone Chone. 2026.
- Barbosa, F.S.; Scavarda, A.J. Value Chain of Mega Events: A Case Study of an Agricultural Trade Fair. Gest. E Prod. 2018, 25, 626–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vodanović Lukić, I. I Feel at Home: Visitors’ Perspective of Arts Festivals in Croatia. Eur. Countrys. 2025, 17, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, S.; Batista, P.; Sánchez-Sáez, J.A.; Sánchez-Sánchez, J.; Carvalho, M.J. Road Racing Event Management Satisfaction: A Scoping Review of the Literature in Different Populations. Sustainability 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva Barbosa, F.; Scavarda, A.J. Value Chain of Mega Events: A Case Study of an Agricultural Trade Fair. Gest. E Prod. 2018, 25, 626–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, T.H.; Abreu Novais, M.; Arcodia, C.; Berchtenbreiter, R.; Humpe, A.; Nguyen, N. How Authenticity in Events Fosters Social Sustainability: Towards an Authenticity Ecosystem and Implications for Destination Management. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2024, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raspor Janković, S.; Marković, S.; Drpić, D. What Enhances Event Experience Satisfaction? Examining the Role of Event Experience Quality Dimensions. Zb. Veleučilišta U Rijeci 2025, 13, 149–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Kennedy, H.; James, J.D.; Funk, D.C. Leveraging Event Participation Benefits beyond the Running Course: Deciphering the Motivational Basis of Event Satisfaction. J. Sport Manag. 2020, 34, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsiehemy, A. Events-Based Service Quality and Tourism Sustainability: The Mediating and Moderating Role of Value-Based Tourist Behavior. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mair, J.; Wood, E.; Quinn, B. Social Sustainability in Event Management: A Critical Commentary. Event Manag. 2024, 28, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Features | Frequency | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 449 | 46,7 |
| Female | 493 | 51,2 | |
| Other | 20 | 2,1 | |
| Age group | 18-24 | 21 | 2,2 |
| 25–34 | 201 | 20,9 | |
| 35–44 | 289 | 30 | |
| 45–54 | 229 | 23 | |
| 55–64 +65 |
127 103 |
13,2 10,7 |
|
| Education | None | 5 | 0,5 |
| Primary | 30 | 3.1 | |
| Secondary or Baccalaureate | 284 | 29,5 | |
| University | 643 | 66,8 | |
| Place of residence | Foreign | 20 | 2,1 |
| Sierra | 47 | 4,9 | |
| Galapagos | 2 | 0,2 | |
| Amazon | 5 | 0,5 | |
| Costa No Manabí | 101 | 10,5 | |
| Manabí | 342 | 35,6 | |
| Chone | 445 | 46,3 | |
| Breakdown of Factors |
Commonalities |
Factor Loading | Mean | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Factor 1. Main activities RLE – a. Rodeo and livestock exhibition |
0,662 | 0,509 | 4,71 | 0,484 |
| LA – b. Livestock auction | 0,632 | 0,564 | 4,65 | 0,528 |
| CA – c. Cebu Avenue | 0,850 | 0,910 | 4,58 | 0,643 |
| CS – d. Concerts and shows | 0,531 | 0,563 | 4,56 | 0,595 |
| AC – g. Activities for children | 0,749 | 0,717 | 4,60 | 0,539 |
| Factor 2. Complementary Services | ||||
| FB – e. Foods and beverages | 0,694 | 0,850 | 4,61 | 0,621 |
| TP – f. Trade of various products | 0,747 | 0,761 | 4,57 | 0,603 |
| ARP – h. Areas for rest and personal hygiene | 0,648 | 0,726 | 4,58 | 0,598 |
| Extraction method: principal component analysis. Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization. | ||||
| Type of fit | Fit index | Abbreviation | Criterion | Value | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute fit |
Chi-Square divided by Degrees of Freedom | χ²/gl (CMIN/DF) | < 3 | 2.660 | Meets criterion |
| Standardized Root Mean Square Residual | SRMR | < 0.08 | 0.030 | ||
| Root Mean Square Residual | RMR | < 0.05 | 0.0268 | ||
| Goodness-of-Fit Index | GFI | > 0.90 | 0.971 | ||
| Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index | AGFI | > 0.90 | 0.935 | ||
| Root Mean Square Error of Approximation | RMSEA | < 0.08 | 0.068 | ||
| Probability of Close Fit | PCLOSE | > 0.05 | 0.102 | Close fit not rejected | |
| Incremental fit |
Normed Fit Index | NFI | > 0.90 | 0.973 | Meets criterion |
| Relative Fit Index | RFI | > 0.90 | 0.952 | ||
| Incremental Fit Index | IFI | > 0.90 | 0.983 | ||
| Tucker-Lewis Index | TLI | > 0.90 | 0.970 | ||
| Comparative Fit Index | CFI | > 0.95 | 0.983 | ||
| Parsimonious fit | Parsimony Ratio | PRATIO | > 0.50 | 0.571 | Meets criterion |
| Parsimony Normed Fit Index | PNFI | > 0.50 | 0.556 | ||
| Parsimony Comparative Fit Index | PCFI | > 0.50 | 0.562 |
| Construct | AVE ≥ 0.50 | CR ≥ 0.70 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1. Main Activities | 0.552 | 0.859 | Meets requirements |
| Factor 2. Complementary Services | 0.584 | 0.808 | Meets requirements |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).