4.1. Dataset
The experiments are conducted on the Composite SAR Aircraft Dataset (CSAD), which is constructed by fusing airport scenes with SAR aircraft target patches. Specifically, the airport scenes are derived from the Geocoded Ellipsoid Corrected (GEO) imagery products released by Capella Space, featuring a resolution of 0.2 m and encompassing typical airport facilities such as terminal buildings, control towers, hangars, and surrounding greenbelts. The SAR aircraft target patches are sourced from the available SAR-AIRcraft-1.0 dataset, which is primarily acquired by the Gaofen-3 satellite operating in the C-band with a resolution of 1 m.
To encompass the seven typical aircraft categories from the SAR-AIRcraft-1.0 dataset while ensuring realistic effects of the fusion results and overcoming the inherent class imbalance of the original data, the generation process of the CSAD is designed as follows: First, stratified brightness matching is introduced. The entire set of background images and target patches is divided into four brightness levels for intra-level matching, thereby avoiding brightness mismatches between the aircraft patches and the background scenes. Moreover, based on the distance transform, target anchor points are generated within potential aircraft maneuvering areas, ensuring that aircraft instances are restricted to valid regions while maintaining reasonable spacing to prevent overlapping. During the target implantation stage, after completing spatial resolution alignment, a lower absolute intensity threshold is utilized to isolate the aircraft pixels. A slight contrast stretching is then applied to these pixels to enhance the anisotropic reflection characteristics of the metallic targets. Furthermore, a dynamic class-balanced sampling strategy is embedded in the simulation pipeline. By dynamically reducing the sampling weights of high-frequency categories in real time, it effectively mitigates the class imbalance issue in the original data. Eventually, the generated images are sized at 1024×1024 pixels, comprising a total of 2268 images and 6801 aircraft instances. Detailed target information and quantity distributions are presented in
Table 1.
4.2. Implementation Details
All model training and testing were conducted under a unified hardware and software environment. Specifically, the experiments were performed on a workstation running the Ubuntu 20.04x64 operating system, equipped with a single 16 GB memory Quadro RTX 5000 GPU. The algorithms were implemented in Python 3.9, utilizing the PyTorch deep learning framework for model construction and optimization. For the CSAD, 70% of the images were allocated for training, while the remaining 30% were reserved for testing.
To validate the generalizability of the proposed PACE-Det architecture, two representative backbone networks in the field of object detection were selected for comparative experiments: ResNet-50 and CSPNeXt, coupled with a DETR-style head and an anchor-free detection head, respectively. During the training phase, all input images were processed at original resolution without any resizing or scaling adjustments. The training batch size was uniformly set to 2, and the maximum number of epochs was set to 100 for all models.
Specifically, for the ResNet-50 backbone, the AdamW optimizer was employed with an initial learning rate of 0.0001 and a weight decay of 0.0001. A learning rate multiplier of 0.1 was applied to the backbone network to preserve the stability of the pre-trained weights. The learning rate scheduling adopted a two-stage strategy: a linear warm-up was applied for the first 2000 iterations with a starting factor of 0.001, followed by a multi-step learning rate decay that reduced the learning rate by a factor of 0.1 at the 80th and 95th epochs to accelerate loss convergence. For the CSPNeXt backbone, the AdamW optimizer was similarly adopted, with an initial learning rate of 0.004 and a weight decay of 0.05. To enhance the generalization capability of the model, the Exponential Moving Average mechanism was employed with a momentum of 0.0002. Regarding the learning rate scheduling, a linear warm-up with an initial factor of was utilized for the first 1000 iterations, and a Cosine Annealing strategy was implemented during the latter half of the training to smoothly decay the learning rate.
Regarding the internal hyperparameters of the proposed modules presented in
Section 3, the specific configurations are as follows. In the POCE module, to generate an effective Log-Gabor filter bank, the radial bandwidth
and the angular bandwidth
defined in Eq.
1 are 0.55 and 1.2, respectively, constructing a filter array of 4 scales and 6 orientations. When computing the structure tensor to extract local orientations, the scale
of the Gaussian kernel for spatial integration in Eq.
7 is 3.0. Furthermore, during the phase congruency-guided directional colorization process described in Algorithm 1, the exponential decay constant
is 0.08. In the post-processing MSCC module, considering the actual pixel dimensions occupied by aircraft targets in the high-resolution images, the local neighborhood window radius
for spatial scale suppression in Eq.
12 is 4.5. Furthermore, since the POCE module encodes anisotropic target structures into specific directional color channels and suppresses isotropic background clutter into low-intensity regions, the number of color-space topological clusters
K for the K-means algorithm is 5. Additionally, regarding the spatial topology filtering criterion, the filtering threshold for the area ratio of the non-target background region within a predicted bounding box is 0.9.
4.3. Parameter Sensitivity Analysis
In the proposed PACE-Det, the hyperparameter is utilized to balance the conventional detection loss and the phase-aware alignment loss . To investigate the sensitivity of the model to this hyperparameter and determine a local optimal value, a systematic parameter tuning experiment was designed. To evaluate the effectiveness of employing the PC map to constrain the loss function, this evaluation was conducted across both ResNet-50 and CSPNeXt.
Table 2 records the detection performance of the ResNet-50 and CSPNeXt backbone networks under different values of
. The experimental data demonstrate that after introducing the phase-aware alignment loss, the
detection accuracy of both architectures generally improves compared to the configuration where PC is not incorporated as a constraint in the loss function.
Specifically, comparing the performance across different parameter points, the optimal parameter intervals for the two backbones exhibit certain divergence. For ResNet-50, the model achieves the highest accuracy of 0.842 when is set to 1.0 and 2.0. For CSPNeXt, the accuracy reaches a peak of 0.823 when is 0.5. It is worth noting that when is 1.0, the accuracy of CSPNeXt experiences a slight drop to 0.819, but this value still significantly outperforms the unconstrained performance.
The results above indicate that although different network architectures exhibit slightly different peak sensitivities to loss weight, provides a robust balance point capable of delivering locally optimal performance improvements across architectures. Therefore, to avoid overfitting to a specific network architecture, is fixed at 1.0 as a locally optimal reference value for subsequent evaluations.
4.4. Ablation Study
The results of the ablation study for the proposed modules, evaluated on two backbone networks, are presented in
Table 3. First, both baseline models demonstrate high performance under relatively loose threshold conditions, such as mAP
50. This indicates that the detection capabilities of the baseline architectures approach saturation for coarse localization. However, as the requirement for localization precision increases, the baseline models experience performance degradation under higher IoU thresholds. Specifically, the baseline CSPNeXt yields an mAP
90 of 0.305. This demonstrates that although conventional detection networks can roughly locate SAR targets, the generated bounding boxes lack geometric tightness.
4.4.1. Effect of POCE
The independent introduction of the POCE module yields performance improvements in high-localization-precision metrics. Specifically, in the CSPNeXt network, incorporating POCE increases the from 0.305 to 0.541; similarly, in the ResNet-50 network, the achieves an increase of 6.1% . The performance improvement achieved under high IoU thresholds is primarily attributed to the effective extraction of the geometric contours of the targets by POCE. Due to the presence of discrete strong scattering noise in single-channel grayscale SAR images, conventional networks tend to focus their attention on localized isolated scattering points, resulting in relatively loose bounding boxes. POCE utilizes PC to extract physical boundaries and maps them into directional color features. This front-end feature guidance mechanism compels the backbone network to shift its focus from local strong scattering points to the overall geometric structure of the targets during the feature extraction stage, thereby generating tighter predicted bounding boxes.
To analyze the mechanism of the POCE module from the perspective of network learning dynamics,
Figure 6 plots the training convergence curves of the two backbone networks before and after the introduction of this module, using
as the reference metric. It can be observed that the impact of the POCE module on the network convergence process exhibits distinct staged characteristics. Specifically, for ResNet-50, the ascent trajectory of the network equipped with POCE highly overlaps with that of the baseline network during the early training stage; as training progresses into the middle and later stages, the network equipped with POCE gradually overcomes the performance bottleneck of the baseline and ultimately converges stably at a higher precision level. In contrast, CSPNeXt experiences a temporary performance lag during the initial training stage after the introduction of POCE; however, after passing the initial feature adaptation phase, the model achieves a rapid precision increase between the 25th and 35th epochs, surpasses the baseline network, and maintains its lead thereafter. The aforementioned dynamic differences indicate that although the spatial topological priors extracted by POCE exhibit distinct adaptation processes during the early feature fitting stages across different architectures, their core value lies in providing reliable geometric constraints for feature refinement in the middle and later stages of the network. Such physical constraints enable the model to avoid prematurely falling into local optima, thereby elevating the final performance upper bound of the detection task.
4.4.2. Effect of MSCC
When applying the MSCC post-processing filter to the baseline detectors independently of the core optimization process, detection performance is notably improved, particularly in suppressing false alarms induced by airport backgrounds. Since MSCC requires color-space representations for topological clustering, deploying only MSCC means that the pseudo-color images generated by the POCE module need to be exported for color space conversion and clustering, but the images participating in the inference phase are the original grayscale SAR images unprocessed by the POCE module. By applying the spatial masks generated by MSCC to the predicted bounding boxes generated by the baseline detector trained on grayscale SAR images, stable improvements in localization precision are observed across both baseline models. Specifically, within the CSPNeXt network, the sole addition of the MSCC elevates the metric from 0.305 to 0.460. Concurrently, in the ResNet-50 network, the is boosted from 0.916 to 0.938. Based on the experimental data, it can be concluded that by introducing spatial constraints and performing overlap ratio verification on the initial bounding boxes generated by the core detection network, the MSCC module effectively filters out false positives emerging on anisotropic, high-intensity scatterers. Consequently, it successfully enhances precision without compromising the recall rate, thereby realizing accuracy improvements across various threshold conditions.
However, it should be pointed out that the empirical effectiveness demonstrated by the MSCC module in suppressing airport clutter is currently primarily based on heuristic modeling. The establishment and effective operation of this module fundamentally rely on the preceding feature mapping of the POCE module; namely, MSCC can only execute topological clustering in the color space after POCE successfully encodes anisotropic objects in grayscale SAR images into pseudo-colors and suppresses isotropic backgrounds into dark tones. Consequently, the applicability boundary of the MSCC module is directly constrained by the geometric and scattering feature contrast between targets and the background.
Finally, when integrating both the POCE and MSCC modules simultaneously, the model achieves the highest detection performance among the tested configurations. Since POCE provides tight contour guidance at the structural feature level, while MSCC enforces strict clutter filtering at the spatial topological level, the two modules form effective complementary advantages. The final PACE-Det architecture achieves metrics of 0.851 and 0.836 on ResNet-50 and CSPNeXt, respectively. This demonstrates that the combined configuration can simultaneously maintain high localization precision and effective false alarm suppression capabilities when dealing with complex SAR airport scenarios.
4.5. Efficiency Analysis
After validating the performance improvements yielded by the POCE and MSCC modules, it is essential to evaluate the computational overhead introduced by these physical priors and spatial constraints.
Table 4 presents the end-to-end efficiency comparison of the models based on two backbone architectures.
Fundamentally, for both backbone architectures, the additional parameters and computational cost introduced by PACE-Det originate entirely from the same components. Specifically, the computational increment of approximately 3.7 GFLOPs stems from the POCE frequency-domain transformations executed prior to the core network, alongside the MSCC clustering operations applied as post-processing. Meanwhile, the parameter increment of 0.147 M is attributed to the physical alignment projector, which is activated exclusively during the training phase. Within the detection framework, regardless of whether ResNet-50 or CSPNeXt is adopted, the extracted multi-scale features are uniformly mapped to a fixed 256 channels by the neck network. Since the feature map dimensions received by the projector are strictly fixed, its own convolutional layer structure and parameter count naturally remain consistent.
4.6. Comparison with State-of-the-Art Methods
To further validate the detection efficacy of PACE-Det in complex SAR scenarios, this subsection presents a comprehensive performance comparison with several SOTA object detection frameworks. The selection of baseline models encompasses diverse architectural paradigms, including classical two-stage detection frameworks, representative single-stage models, Transformer-based architectures, and specialized SAR aircraft detectors. For a rigorous evaluation, the CSAD is partitioned into training and testing sets with a 7:3 ratio, consisting of the first 70% and the remaining 30% of the images, respectively. While all experiments are conducted under identical hardware and software environments to ensure fairness, the hyperparameters for each baseline model are adaptively fine-tuned according to their inherent architectural characteristics to facilitate stable convergence and optimal performance.
Based on the conclusions of the ablation study, the PACE-Det configuration with the ResNet-50 backbone is selected as the default implementation for comparison, as it yields the optimal overall performance. As presented in
Table 5, PACE-Det achieves a comprehensive
of 0.851, outperforming all other baseline models.
Regarding the performance distribution across different IoU thresholds, YOLOv8m achieves the highest accuracy of 0.992 under the relaxed metric. This indicates that purely data-driven single-stage models can effectively learn coarse semantic information through deep network architectures to provide initial localization. However, under more stringent localization requirements such as and , the performance of general frameworks degrades significantly. In contrast, PACE-Det demonstrates superior adaptability, achieving peak values of 0.948 and 0.561 for and , respectively.
The performance limitations of general frameworks at high IoU thresholds primarily stem from the inability of purely data-driven visual mechanisms to fully adapt to the specific physical phenomena of SAR imagery. Traditional convolutional neural networks, such as Faster R-CNN and Cascade R-CNN, are prone to local feature confusion when encountering discrete scattering and high-intensity background clutter. Meanwhile, the attention mechanism in Transformer architectures, represented by Deformable DETR, is affected by speckle noise, making it difficult to focus precisely on the complete geometric topology of targets without spatial constraints.
As validated in the previous ablation study, the capability of PACE-Det to overcome these bottlenecks fundamentally relies on the synergy between the POCE and MSCC modules. While conventional frameworks suffer from localization drift or false alarms in complex SAR airport scenarios due to the lack of physical modeling and spatial constraints, PACE-Det maintains robustness through physical contour guidance in the early stages and spatial topological filtering in the late stages. Consequently, it comprehensively surpasses existing advanced architectures in terms of extreme detection precision.
Building upon the aforementioned quantitative evaluation that underscores extreme detection precision, the testing scope is extended from standard image slices to large-scale simulated monitoring scenarios to further verify the practical applicability of PACE-Det in complex scenarios. In accordance with the construction strategy of the CSAD, aircraft detection and recognition tasks characteristic of practical airport scenes are reconstructed by implanting aircraft targets into large-scale empty airport backgrounds. Sliding window detection is performed on two simulated large-scale airport scenes, using the specialized SAR aircraft detector PGD as a benchmark. The detection results are illustrated in
Figure 7.
Notably, to demonstrate the cross-framework applicability of the proposed spatial constraints, the topological masks generated by PACE-Det were exported offline and subsequently integrated into the inference phase of PGD for joint spatial verification. As shown in
Figure 7, clutter from airport peripheral facilities is effectively suppressed, with neither PGD nor PACE-Det producing false positive predictions outside the target areas. Furthermore, while PGD demonstrates proficient classification of specific aircraft models due to its extensive training on the SAR-AIRcraft-1.0 dataset, it struggles to generate bounding boxes that tightly fit the targets. Consequently, a portion of the predicted boxes generated by PGD fail to achieve the strict IoU threshold of 0.8 and are excluded from the final visualization. The ground truth boxes of these targets are highlighted in red to clarify that such misses are caused by localization deficiency rather than classification failure. We verified that these targets are actually correctly classified when the IoU requirement is relaxed. In
Figure 7, even for a PGD prediction that meets the 0.8 IoU threshold, the box still encapsulates significant clutter from adjacent boarding bridges.
In contrast, these localization and fitting issues are effectively resolved in PACE-Det. The superiority of PACE-Det stems from the POCE module, which introduces spatial topological priors to guide the feature alignment process. Unlike purely data-driven bounding box regression, the phase-aware guidance ensures that the model remains sensitive to the inherent spatial geometric structures of the aircraft, rather than being biased by high-intensity noise or overlapping background echoes.
In summary, the experimental evaluations presented substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The results indicate that the performance advantages of PACE-Det, particularly at high IoU thresholds, are primarily attributed to the synergy between the physical contour guidance provided by the POCE module and the spatial topological constraints of the MSCC module. Both the quantitative analysis on standardized datasets and the qualitative results in large-scale simulated scenes demonstrate the model’s capability to mitigate scattering discreteness and background interference, confirming that PACE-Det provides a reliable technical solution for high-precision SAR aircraft detection in complex environments.