Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Recycling Fully Bio-Based Poly(Butylene Succinate)/Brewer’s Spent Grain Pot Prototypes

Submitted:

05 July 2026

Posted:

06 July 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The recyclability of entirely bio-based pots made from brewer's grains (BSG) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) in a weight ratio of 70:30, hereinafter referred to as MIXr, was evaluated. The resulting pots exhibited performance comparable to that of fos-sil-based plastics. The study aimed to determine the maximum percentage of recycled ma-terial that could be incorporated into virgin PBS (PBSv) while maintaining acceptable properties, thereby extending the material's life cycle through mechanical recycling before disposal via biodegradation or composting. For comparison, reference blends of virgin and recycled PBS (PBSv–PBSr) were prepared with identical compositions. The materials were characterized in terms of processability, tensile properties, thermal stability (TGA), chemi-cal group analysis (FTIR), and surface properties. The results showed that the presence of BSG significantly influences the recyclability of the biocomposite. While PBSv can contain up to 10 wt.% recycled PBS without significant losses in ductility or thermal stability, PBSv–MIXr blends exhibit reduced deformability (~20–30%) at MIXr contents between 2 and 20 wt.% and a reduction in thermal stability ranging between 16-22% at levels of in-corporation ranging between 10wt.% and 40 wt.%.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

This study aims to provide new insights into the recyclability of produced fully bio-based prototypes (pots) made from a blend of biodegradable/bioderived bioplastics and industrial agri-food waste, while also evaluating the role of the agri-food waste in the recycling process.
The growing environmental concerns associated with conventional fossil-based plastics have stimulated the development of more sustainable polymeric materials, particularly bio-based, biodegradable, and compostable bioplastics [1,2,3].
Despite their promising potential to reduce plastic waste accumulation, further research is still needed to assess their overall suitability as alternatives to conventional plastics in terms of performance, functionality, and long-term environmental impact [4,5,6]. Moreover, many biodegradable polymers degrade efficiently only under controlled industrial composting conditions, whereas their persistence in natural environments may still raise environmental concerns [6]. Although industrial composting is currently one of the most widely adopted end-of-life strategies for these materials, it results in complete material degradation; therefore, alternative approaches aimed at extending material utility through recovery and reutilization should be further explored [4,5]. Although they still account for a relatively small share of the polymer market, bio-based and biodegradable plastics are gaining increasing commercial importance. This group includes several widely studied materials, such as polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), polycaprolactone (PCL), and thermoplastic starch (TPS). Their widespread use in food packaging and disposable products has made industrial composting, performed under controlled temperature and humidity, one of the most commonly adopted end-of-life (EoL) strategies [7].
The principal EoL routes for PBS-based products after their first use (namely landfilling, biodegradation/composting, and incineration) ultimately lead to the complete degradation or destruction of the material [4,8]. Therefore, before pursuing these terminal options, it is important to consider strategies to extend the functional value of bioplastics beyond their initial use phase [5].
Mechanical recycling represents a valuable strategy for extending the service life of post-consumer bioplastics [9]. According to Garofalo et al., the mechanical recycling of materials such as PLA and PBS may provide greater environmental benefits than landfilling or industrial composting, primarily because it results in lower net CO₂ emissions [10]. Unlike terminal end-of-life (EoL) options, recycling enables the regeneration and reuse of polymers for the same or secondary applications, thereby avoiding the environmental impacts associated with the production of virgin materials. The same authors also highlighted the industrial relevance of this approach, as it can both reduce production costs and improve the sustainability of polymer-processing value chains. This is especially important in high-throughput manufacturing technologies for single-use products (including extrusion, blow molding, thermoforming, and injection molding), which inherently generate substantial amounts of recyclable process scrap. As this practice is already well-established in fossil-based polymer systems, it could also be applied to bioplastics, provided that material properties are adequately retained [11,12,13,14]. Overall, the use of bioplastics for extended life cycles requires understanding and controlling chemical, structural, and morphological changes during recycling, linking material properties to potential secondary applications [15].
In this context, pellets of PBS can generally withstand up to approximately four to five reprocessing cycles before the reduction in molar mass compromises their performance [16]. These results confirm previous studies on PBS recycling, which highlight good mechanical properties, supporting its use in closed-loop or cascade recycling processes [17,18]. However, the mechanical recycling of PBS is primarily limited by the reduction in molecular mass due to hydrolysis during thermal treatment in the presence of moisture. Furthermore, PBS is subject to physical aging, with rearrangements in the amorphous domains that can reduce chain mobility and alter its mechanical and rheological properties over time [17]. Among strategies for limiting molecular mass loss, vitrimerization is an upcycling approach that transforms the polymer into a dynamic network that is stable yet capable of reorganizing upon heating, thereby enabling multiple reprocessing cycles and greater degradation resistance [18].
In the present study, we reused commercial fully biobased pot prototypes produced by injection molding. The use of natural agri-food waste in both bio-derived and biodegradable bioplastics such as PBS makes the resulting bio-composites a fully green material. Two types of pot were investigated: white color pot, made of pure PBS, and brown color pot (made of 70/30 wt.% PBS/BSG bio-composite in which PBS is mixed with 30 wt.% industrial agri-food waste from the brewery called Brewer’s Spent Grain (BSG), see Figure 1). The use of agri-food waste in bio-composites represents a strategy for the valorization of agro-industrial residues produced in Sicily, as already highlighted in our previous studies [19,20]. Both pot types were ground and remixed with virgin PBS granules to produce blends of virgin material (v) mixed with recycled material (r) at concentrations ranging from 2to 40 wt.%. All the starting materials (i.e., PBS, BSG, and 70/30% PBS/BSG) have been previously studied by our group to evaluate chemical, physical, and mechanical biodegradability and processing aspects [16,20,21].
In this study, we demonstrated that bio-composite pots also have acceptable mechanical performance compared to traditional pots suitable for horticultural applications, made with fossil-based polymers (polyolefins), and we paid particular attention to the role that BSG plays in pot recycling. To the best of our knowledge, there are no further comparative data or systematic studies to assess the maximum amount of this recycled biocomposite to be added to PBSv without compromising its physical-mechanical performance. The findings of this study are particularly relevant to scenarios in which commercial containers are recovered for recycling after a long period of use and/or warehouse storage, as is often the case in industrial practice. This aspect is of particular significance given that the European market for plant pots is estimated to exceed 3 billion units per year, with Italy being one of the leading horticultural markets in Southern Europe [22].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The starting raw materials used in this study were:
a) Virgin PBS (code: PBSv): bioplastic supplied by Xinjiang Blue Ridge Tunhe Sci.&Tech. Co., Ltd. (No. 316 Beijing Nan Lu, Changji city, Xinjiang, China). PBS lot number: 202205272506A2, MFI= 25-30 g/10 min.
b) Recycled PBS (code: PBSr) obtained from the crushing of prototypes of pots made from virgin PBS and prepared for injection molding by Mavi S.a.s. of Magistro Francesco, Via Ferrara 98061 Brolo (ME).
c) Recycled blend (code: MIXr), obtained from the crushing of pots made from pellets consisting of virgin PBS blended with brewer’s spent grain (BSG) as agrifood waste (bio-composite PBS/BSG 70/30, wt./wt.).
d) In detail, BSG was re-used as agrifood waste in a mesh < 100 μm and at 30 wt.% according to Visco et al. [20] to produce pellets of PBS/BSG 70/30 wt./wt by EcoBuddy™ bioplastics (Contrada Internicola, Zona Campo Sportivo SNC 98040 Roccavaldina (ME) Italy). Pellets were then used to produce the pots by using an injection molding machine operated by Mavi S.a.s. di Magistro Francesco, Via Ferrara 98061 Brolo (ME).
All materials were dried in an oven at 60°C for 4 h to reach a humidity level of 0.08 wt.%. The raw materials used are summarized in Table 1 and shown illustrated in Figure 1. The melt flow rate (MFR) of virgin PBS (37.36 g/10 min) is higher than that reported in the PBS datasheet (25-30 g/10 min) [24]. This indicates the beginning of degradation of the virgin PBS, since the production date was May 2022, while the tests were performed in November 2025 on pellets taken from a still-sealed package as part of this experimental campaign.
The MFR values of the recycled materials (PBSr and MIXr) were both extremely high (159 g/10 min and 153 g/10 min, respectively), in accordance with literature data [16]. In fact, plant pots, produced in 2024 and kept on shelves (warehouse storage) up to the testing date (November 2025, about one year and nine months after production), were evidently subject to environmental degradation, leading to higher flowability. The increase in melt flow index (MFI) is widely considered an indicator of polymer degradation, since chain scission reduces molecular weight and melt viscosity, thereby increasing the material's flowability [25,26].
To perform the characterization tests, biocomposite sheets were prepared by melt compounding the raw materials listed in Table 2 in a Brabender Plasticorder PL2100 at 140 °C for 10 min and 40 rpm. Table 2 reports the composition of all the blends and the actual BSG content in the PBSv–MIXr formulations, which decreases from the initial 30 wt.% in MIXr due to dilution to lower values, ranging from 0.6 wt.% (in PBSv–MIXr2) to 12 wt.% (in PBSv–MIXr40). In the same Table 2, the amount of PBS in each PBSv–MIXr blend is detailed. The resulting blends were then compression-molded into 12 × 12 cm sheets with a thickness of 1 mm using a hydraulic press and a three-stage cycle: 7 min at 0 bar, 5 min at 50 bar, and 3 min at 100 bar.
The produced sheets are shown in Figure 2a,b; they appear generally uniform. The sheets were superimposed to better highlight the color variation. The color of virgin PBS is typically white, while the color of MIX is dark brown. The color of PBSv-PBSr remains white regardless of the PBSr amount (Figure 2a). The color of the PBSv-MIXr blends is intermediate between white and dark brown, assuming a progressive darkening with increasing MIXr content (different shades of light brown/beige, Figure 2b).

2.2. Characterization Analyses

Virgin PBS was pre-dried at 60°C for 4 h to reach a humidity level (HL) of 0.08%, PBSr was pre-dried at 60°C for 4 h to reach an HL value of 0.06%, and MIXr was also pre-dried at 60°C /overnight to reach an HL of 0.12%. To keep HL as low as possible, we consider the following threshold values that should not be exceeded: 0.08 wt.% HL for PBS and 2 wt.% HL regarding BSG in the MIXr bio-composite. The humidity level of all the materials has been checked by an AXIS moisture analyzer, mod. AST120, by heating the samples at 60°C.
The melt flow rate (MFR) of the bio composites was measured using an Instron melt flow indexer (model C-MFI5, system ID MFI5-B31599) supplied by ITW Test Measurement Italia S.r.l., Pianezza (TO), Italy. Measurements were performed in accordance with ISO 1133 under a load of 2.16 kg at 190 °C, following the B/C test procedure. Each sample was tested in triplicate, and the mean value was used for analysis.
During the melt-compounding process, processability was evaluated using mixing torque measurements. Torque values were continuously recorded during the mixing using WINMIX software on a Brabender Plasticorder PL2100 system, to assess the mixing behavior of all raw materials and blends listed in Table 2. The reported torque–time curves represent the average of three independent experimental runs.
To evaluate tensile behavior, all sheets were cut using Ray-Ran Test Equipment Ltd. (Model: RR/HCP/124) to obtain dog-bone specimens. The specimen geometry was in accordance with ASTM D638, with a width of 2.5 mm, a thickness of 1 mm, and a gauge length of 15 mm. Tensile properties were evaluated using a Lloyd LR10K universal testing machine (Elis – Electronic Instruments & Systems S.r.l., Rome, Italy). The tests were performed under quasi-static conditions with a 0.5 kN load cell, applying an initial preload of 1.00 N and a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. All measurements were carried out under laboratory conditions (approximately 20 °C and 65% relative humidity) in accordance with ASTM D638 standard. The mechanical parameters derived from the stress–strain curves and discussed in this study include Young’s modulus (E), tensile strength (σr), elongation at break (εr), and work at break (W). Eight specimens were tested for each formulation to minimize the impact of individual inconsistencies or measurement errors.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using TA Instruments SDT Q600 under an argon flow of 100 mL/min to determine the thermal decomposition temperatures of each sample. Approximately 10 mg of each selected sample was analyzed. Samples were initially heated from room temperature to 105 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, followed by an isothermal hold at 105 °C for 10 min to eliminate residual moisture. Subsequently, the samples were heated at 10 °C/min up to 700 °C, then were cooled to room temperature under laboratory ambient atmosphere. TGA profiles were evaluated in accordance with ASTM E2550 [27]. The primary parameters considered included: Tonset, defined as the point on the thermogravimetric curve where the first deviation from the baseline occurs before the thermal degradation event; Tmax, the temperature corresponding to the maximum rate of mass change; and Δw, representing the change in sample mass as a function of temperature or time. Experimentally, Δw was determined from the integration of the corresponding mass loss across the baseline boundary of the derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) peak, expressed as a percentage.
FTIR Analysis: IR spectra were recorded using a “Spectrum Two” Perkin Elmer FT-IR spectrometer across a wavenumber range of 4000–500 cm⁻¹, at a spectral resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ and 32 scans per sample. Background correction was performed before each acquisition. Spectra were processed using TA Spectrum software and Origin. Samples were dried for 4 h at 60 °C before testing.
The formation of oxidate species (carbonyl and hydroxyl) indices were calculated using equations (1) and (2), where A denotes the area of the corresponding peak:
C a r b o n y l   I n d e x   ( C . I ) = A 1710 A 2920
H y d r o x y l   I n d e x   ( H . I ) = A 3600 3200 A 2920
Based on previous studies [16], the band at 2920 cm⁻¹ was selected as the reference, as it shows minimal variation during the degradation process.
Statistical Analysis: Mechanical (tensile) test data were analyzed statistically using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. The normality and lognormality of the datasets were assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was evaluated using the Brown–Forsythe test. All datasets met the assumptions of these tests. Accordingly, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was performed to determine statistically significant differences among the experimental groups (α = 0.05).
The surface roughness measurements were performed using a portable and compact Surftest SJ-210 Series 178 Roughness tester (Mitutoyo S.r.l., Milan, Italy), according to Equation (3).
R a = 1 N i = 1 n | Y i ˙ |
In this equation, Ra represents the arithmetic mean of the absolute deviations of the evaluation profile (Yi) from the mean line. The experimental values (listed in detail in Table S3 of the Supplementary Information) correspond to the average of ten independent measurements obtained for each sample formulation.
Surface Shore-D hardness was measured for PBSv–PBSr and PBSv–MIXr samples in accordance with the ASTM D2240 standard, using a Shore D durometer (model PCE TH210FJ, PCE Italia s.r.l., Capannori, Italy; resolution 0.1 Shore D units, accuracy ±1 within a scale range of 0–100) [28]. A 5 kg static mass was applied to the top of the durometer to ensure consistent indenter penetration. For each formulation, measurements were repeated ten times on the same specimen at different surface locations. The reported hardness values correspond to the average of these measurements
The colorimetric properties of the samples were determined using a PCE-CSM 1 colorimeter (PCE Instruments UK Ltd.). The measurements were performed in the CIELAB color space, where L* denotes lightness (0 = black, 100 = white), while a* and b* describe the green (−) to red (+) and blue (−) to yellow (+) chromatic axes, respectively [29]. For each sample, ten measurements were collected at different locations to ensure reproducibility and reduce the influence of local surface heterogeneity, and the reported values correspond to their average. The total color difference (ΔE*) was calculated from the obtained L*, a*, and b* values according to Equation (4):
E * = [ ( L * ) 2 + ( a * ) 2 + ( b * ) 2 ] 1 / 2
where L*, a*, and b* represent the color coordinates of the reference sample. The values of lightness (L*) and of E, listed in Table S3 in the Supplementary information, represent the average of these measurements. To reproduce the actual appearance of the samples, the CIELAB coordinates were converted into the CIEXYZ color space and subsequently into linear RGB values proportional to light intensity. A gamma correction was then applied to obtain the final display RGB values. Additional color data are provided in Table S3 of the Supplementary Information.
SEM analysis: fractographic characterization of the tensile-tested dog-bone specimens was performed by SEM using a ZEISS Crossbeam 540 instrument (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Images were collected at 1000X and 2000X magnification with an operating voltage of 5 kV. Before examination, the fracture surfaces were metallized with a chromium coating using a Quorum Q150T ES sputtering system (Quorum Technologies, West Sussex, UK) to enhance the electrical conductivity of the specimens. The optical microscopy (OM) images were collected using a Hirox KH8700 digital microscope (Hirox, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with a MX(G)-5040Z lens.

3. Results

3.1. Assessment of Prototype Suitability for the Intended Application

At the time of production (February 2024), the mechanical tensile properties of the injection-molded PBS-BSG30 bio composite pots were compared with those of commercially available fossil-based plastic pots (used in horticultural applications), which were made from recycled high-density polyethylene (r-HDPE) and polypropylene (PP), as well as with neat polybutylene succinate (PBS). Dog-bone specimens were machined directly from the pots (shown in Figure 3a) and subjected to tensile testing; the results are reported in Figure 3b.
The analysis of the main mechanical parameters indicates that the PBS-BSG30 prototype exhibits satisfactory tensile performance. It shows a tensile strength at break of 37.15 MPa, exceeding the values measured for both PP and r-LDPE, and a stiffness of 264.10 MPa, which is also higher than that of commercial fossil-based materials. These properties, combined with the biodegradability of the PBS-BSG30 bio composite, provide a significant advantage by enabling a more sustainable product life cycle. The only limitation is its lower elongation at break (21.76%), which is more than one order of magnitude lower than that of PP and r-LDPE (1125% and 909%, respectively). However, such a high degree of deformability is not required for the intended application as a plant pot and therefore does not represent a practical drawback. For this specific application, it will also be necessary to validate the biological interaction of the bio-composite within the soil, investigating its potential effects on the biota and verifying any impact on plant germination and growth processes.

3.2. Processability: Torque Analysis

Torque–time curves over the ten-minute mixing period are presented in Figure 3a and Figure 3b. An initial peak in torque is observed upon the addition of the materials to the mixing chamber. Subsequently, the torque for all mixtures decreases and stabilizes after approximately 5–6 minutes, indicating that the components have fully blended.
As the maximum torque peak consists of multiple sub-peaks due to the progressive melting of the material upon addition to the chamber, torque values after 6 minutes of mixing were selected for analysis. The torque values at 6 minutes are detailed in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 4a, where the reference materials (PBSv, PBSr, and MIXr) are indicated with colored arrows in all graphs. The torque of virgin PBS (3940 Nm) increases with the addition of small amounts of recycled PBSr and MIXr materials (< 10 wt.%).
The incorporation of recycled PBS into a virgin matrix generally reduces processing torque and melt viscosity [30]. Torque values for PBSv–MIXr blends are generally higher than those for PBSv–PBSr blends at the same recycled content, in line with previous studies reporting that the addition of agri-food waste from brewer's grains increases the viscosity of the molten polymer [20] due to its lignin–cellulosic nature.
From a chemical point of view, PBS is a polyester, like polyethylene terephthalate (PET), with ester groups along the main chain. However, unlike PET, which contains rigid aromatic units, PBS has an aliphatic backbone that imparts greater flexibility and significantly lower glass-transition and melting temperatures. In the case of PET, the addition of recycled material to virgin matrices generally results in a reduction or maintenance of processing torque, attributable to polymer chain scission induced during recycling and the consequent decrease in melt viscosity. Under certain conditions, however, torque increases may be observed, related to molecular reconditioning processes or chain extension reactions that promote the formation of branched structures and an increase in molecular weight [31].
Like PET, when PBS is subjected to thermomechanical stress, it can generate radical species that evolve either towards chain scission (at high stress) or towards recombination reactions (at lower stress), leading to the formation of branched structures [11,15]. Consequently, the rheological response of melt torque is governed by the competition between degradation via chain scission and branching phenomena arising from non-selective radical recombination [14,32]. In our specific system consisting of blends of virgin PBS with PBSr and MIXr (containing BSG), the variation in melt torque is governed by the balance between phenomena in the recycled PBS fraction and effects arising from the presence of BSG in MIXr.
However, the torque trend appears similar across the two blend types: at low recycled content of PBSr and of MIXr (< 10 wt.%), the torque increases from 3940 Nm in PBSv to 4829 NM in PBSv-PBSr2 and to 4853 Nm in PBSv-MIXr5, suggesting that chain branching predominates. At contents above 20 wt.%, a decrease in torque is observed in both blends (up to 1993 Nm in PBSv-PBSr40 and up to 2580 Nm in PBSv-MIXr40), indicating that chain scission becomes the dominant mechanism. The two linear trends checked up to 40 wt.% converge towards the limiting torque values of the neat materials, namely 1.161 Nm for MIXr and 0.46 Nm for PBSr (see light-dotted lines in Figure4a). These latter very low torque value of PBSr and MIXr compared to all other materials, agrees with the MFR data discussed previously (listed in table1) and confirms that these materials have undergone some degradation during the quite two years post-production warehouse storage (reasonably due to photodegradation and/or exposure to moisture) [33].

3.3. Mechanical Performance: Tensile Test and Morphological Observations

Table S1 (Supplementary Information) reports the detailed values of the mechanical parameters derived from the stress–strain curves of the PBSv/PBSr blends (Figure5a) and PBSv/MIXr blends (Figure 5b). The stress-strain curves clearly show that adding PBSr to virgin PBS at 2-10 wt.% preserves the material's ductile character, despite PBSr's intrinsic brittleness, as suggested by the MFR and torque results discussed before. The yield strength of PBSv remains essentially unchanged (~39 MPa) with the inclusion of 10 wt.% PBSr (p>0,9999), whereas the yield strain decreases from approximately 31% to ~24% (p<0,0001). Other mechanical parameters, including stiffness, break tensile strength, break strain, and work at break, show progressive reductions: stiffness decreases from ~394 MPa to ~380 MPa (reducing of ~3.5%, p=0,6009),), break strength from ~43 MPa to ~38 MPa (reducing of ~11% p=0,0004), break strain from ~399% to ~271% (reducing of ~32%, p<0,0001),), and work at break from ~5.9 J to ~4.6 J (reducing of ~22%, p<0,0001). When higher amounts of recycled PBSr are added to virgin PBS (20–40 wt.%), no yielding occurs, and the ultimate strain decreases by approximately an order of magnitude, reaching around 24%. The tensile strength decreases from ~43 MPa for PBSv to ~36 MPa for PBSv–PBSr40.
The trends of Young’s modulus, tensile strength, elongation at break, and work at break as a function of recycled content are presented in Figure 5c-f. The data indicate that the material stiffens with increasing recycled content (Figure 5c), while tensile strength, elongation, and work at break progressively decrease (Figure 5e–f). Across all mechanical parameters, the PBSv–PBSr blends consistently show higher values than the PBSv–MIXr blends. This suggests that the addition of MIXr destabilizes the virgin polymer matrix more than recycled PBSr.
PBSv–MIXr blends exhibit low ductility even at minimal MIXr content (2 wt.%), with a stiffness of 360 MPa, tensile strength of 28.61 MPa, elongation at break of 33%, and work at failure of 0.35 J. In the blend with the highest MIXr content (PBSv–MIXr40), stiffness increases by ~7% to 385 MPa, tensile strength decreases by ~12% to 25 MPa, elongation at break decreases by ~51% to 16%, and work at failure decreases by ~34% to 0.23 J, compared with PBSv–MIXr2.
Brewer’s spent grain (BSG) particles can contribute to the oxidative stability of the composite due to the presence of lignin, which acts as a natural antioxidant. However, the BSG filler exhibits limited interfacial adhesion with the polymer matrix, since no specific compatibilizing agent was incorporated into the bio composite formulation.
Consequently, the mechanical reprocessing involved in recycling promotes the formation of microcracks and voids, as clearly evidenced by SEM morphological analysis (Figure 6). These defects act as preferential pathways for the penetration of moisture and other environmental agents, thereby accelerating material deterioration and contributing to the observed decline in both mechanical and physical performance. In particular, the highly hydrophilic nature of BSG promotes moisture absorption, further promoting the degradation process of the biocomposite.
Figure 6a shows the surfaces of PBSv, PBSr, and MIXr. Both PBS surfaces (virgin and recycled) are rough, as is typical for a ductile and deformable continuous-phase material. However, the morphology of MIXr is different due to the presence of elongated BSG rods protruding from the matrix and the presence of voids between the reinforcement and the matrix, due to the absence of a compatibilizing agent in the mixture.
Figure 7 shows the surfaces of the PBSv-PBSr and PBSv-MIXr blends at different percentages of recycled material (from 2wt.% to 40wt.%). The morphology of virgin PBS/recycled PBS blends is always characterized by a rough fracture surface, regardless of the percentage of recycled material. Only in the blend containing 40% recycled PBS by weight are some limited void areas observed.
In contrast, PBSv-MIXr blends consistently show the presence of BSG particles and an overall smoother fracture surface than PBSv-PBSr blends. Localized voids at the interface between the BSG particles and the polymer matrix are clearly visible, indicating poor interfacial adhesion. Furthermore, numerous indentations are observed left by the detachment of the BSG particles during the brittle fracture induced by the mechanical tensile test. The presence of voids, cracks, and particle pull-out phenomena confirms the brittle behavior of these blends.
To overcome these limitations, ongoing research involves the development of composites compatibilized with natural compatibilizing agents. This approach is expected to improve interfacial adhesion between the filler and the matrix, reduce interfacial tensions, and ultimately improve the durability and recyclability of the material. The only formulation developed by our research group that included a compatibilizing additive employed α-tocopherol (vitamin E), whose action is primarily based on physical interactions and is therefore relatively weak [34]. Future studies should focus on the development and evaluation of other bio-based and environmentally friendly compatibilizers capable of providing a more effective compatibilizing action.
Based on these results, we can conclude that virgin polybutylene succinate can be blended as follows:
a) with PBSr in an amount up to 10 wt.%, to maintain good ductility, with a yield stress of ~35–39 MPa, yield strain around 25%, and elongation at break near 270%. Such blends are suitable for second-life materials used in applications requiring good deformability and toughness. Higher recycled content in PBSr eliminates the ductility of virgin PBS, resulting in an impressive reduction in strain to 22–24%.
b) with MIXr in an amount up to 30–40 wt.%, producing blends that are brittle but suitable for second-life materials that can find applications demanding high stiffness, low deformability, and low toughness. MIXr is intrinsically stiff and brittle, with an elongation at break of ~4%. Adding MIXr to PBSv reduces deformability by roughly 17–25 times, with elongation at break decreasing from nearly 400% to 23–16% as MIXr content increases from 2 wt.% to 40 wt.%, respectively. This is due to the presence of BSG, which disturbs the structural order within the polymer matrix and acts as a filler rather than a reinforcing agent [20]. This results in a higher stress concentration at the filler–matrix interface, where voids and discontinuities form [16].

3.4. Thermal Stability

To evaluate the thermal stability of the blends, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed. The TGA and DTG curves are shown in Figure 8a,b, and the main quantitative parameters are summarized in Table S2 (in supplementary Information). For clarity of curve visualization, only the PBSv-PBSr and PBSv-MIXr blends containing either a low (10 wt.%) or a high (40 wt.%) recycled fraction are discussed in detail.
The TGA curves show that the PBSv/MIXr blends exhibit different thermal stability compared to the PBSv/PBSr systems. In particular, the onset temperature (Tonset) of virgin PBS is approximately 326 °C. The addition of recycled PBS results in a slight decrease in this parameter, which stands at around 318 °C for the PBSv-PBSr40 blend, a decrease of only 2.5%. Conversely, the introduction of MIXr results in a much more significant reduction in thermal stability: for the PBSv-MIXr40 blend, the Tonset of PBSv decreases from 326 °C to approximately 255 °C, a decrease of about 22%. Accordingly, the thermal stability order of the PBSv/MIXr blends can be summarized as follows:
PBSv > PBSv–MIXr10 > PBSv–MIXr40 > MIXr.
MIXr exhibits the lowest thermal stability, with a Tonset of approximately 238.95 °C. The DTGA curves show two main degradation peaks in the MIXr-containing samples. The first peak (Peak I), highlighted in Figure 8d, is attributed to the decomposition of brewer’s spent grains (BSG), while the second peak (Peak II) corresponds to the thermal degradation of PBS.
As expected, peak I is absent in PBSv–PBSr10 and PBSv–PBSr40 because these formulations do not contain BSG. In the PBSv-MIXr10 and PBSv-MIXr40 samples, the first peak appears in the 296- 307 °C range, whereas the second peak, associated with PBS degradation, occurs between approximately 398 and 401 °C, in line with the behavior of neat PBSv (Table 3).
These results indicate that the lower Tonset values observed for the PBSv–MIXr blends are mainly due to early degradation of the BSG-containing phase, while the principal PBS degradation event remains close to that of virgin PBS. Overall, these results confirm that PBSv-MIXr blends are thermally less stable than PBSv-PBSr blends.

3.5. FTIR Analysis

The FTIR transmittance spectra of PBSv, PBSr, MIXr, BSG, and blends of PBS with low (10wt.%) and high (40wt.%) BSG amounts (PBSv-PBSr10-40 and PBSv-MIXr10-40) were collected in the 4000–500 cm⁻¹ range (Figure S2- supporting information). Peak assignments are reported in Table 3, with the main absorption bands identified by alphabetical labels. We considered the stretching (symmetric and asymmetric) and the bending of hydroperoxide, hydroxyl, and carbonyl signals. As is known, PBS is an aliphatic polyester containing carboxylic groups in its chemical structure that is obtained by the polymerization of succinic acid and 1,4-butanediol. BSG is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and proteins [35]. Hence, the chemical structure is made up of several glucose molecules characterized by the content of numerous hydroxyl groups. The overlapping of the main peaks of the FTIR spectrum occurs in general in all the samples investigated. In detail, we compared the FTIR spectra of virgin and recycled PBS, of MIXr, PBSv and BSG (Figure S1), and of PBSv, PBSr, PBSv-PBSr10/40, and PBSv-MIXr10/40. These results indicate that the recycling process does not significantly affect the chemical qualitative structure of PBS, as no new functional groups are observed beyond those present in the virgin material.
The unchanged chemical composition revealed by FTIR analysis suggests that the differences observed in physical properties might be mainly attributable to the structural arrangements of the blends, rather than to chemical modifications induced by the recycling process. These findings are consistent with the literature, which reports that PBS retains its chemical structure during processing and recycling, with no formation of new functional groups [14]. The same authors emphasize that variations in mechanical properties are primarily driven by changes in chain mobility, molecular weight, and the physical structure of the material, rather than by chemical transformations [36]. In this context, it could be of interest to investigate potential variations in molecular weight and its distribution induced by degradation during recycling. These aspects, not addressed in the present work, will be the subject of future investigations.
FTIR analysis can highlight the effect of recycling on PBS by evaluating the change in the amount of the oxidized species as a function of the recycled amount. With this aim, we estimated the quantitative changes occurring in the chemical species amount during the recycling process by considering the Carbonyl Index (CI) and Hydroxyl Index (HI) of the investigated blends, according to Equations (1) and (2) reported in Section 2.2 (plotted in Figure 9). The trend of the graph shows an increase in carboxylic groups in both blends (PBSv–PBSr and PBSv–MIXr) as the recycled content rises. However, this increase is less pronounced in the PBSv–MIXr system compared to PBSv–PBSr. This behavior can be attributed to the presence of agro-food waste, namely BSG, in the MIXr. BSG exhibits a heterogeneous lignocellulosic structure consisting of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, mainly originating from the barley husk fraction [37]. The lignin is a phenolic macromolecule known for its antioxidant activity. Indeed, lignin extracted from brewer’s spent grain has been reported to exhibit radical scavenging capacity, contributing to the overall oxidative stability of the material [38]. In our case, the presence of BSG helps limit the formation of carboxylic species in the recycled material, according to the findings of other authors [16,37].
The situation is instead reversed with respect to hydroxyl groups. In this case, a higher formation is observed in the PBSv–MIXr blends compared to PBSv–PBSr. This behavior can be attributed again to the presence of brewer’s spent grain (BSG). The high content of polysaccharides bearing hydroxyl groups, together with the porous morphology of the fibrous matrix, results in a significant presence of polar functionalities and, consequently, an overall affinity for water [40]. Therefore, the presence of BSG appears to promote a greater formation of hydroxyl species compared to PBSv–PBSr blends, where BSG is absent, in agreement with literature data [16].

3.6. Surface Features

Finally, an investigation of the surface features of all materials and blends has been done by means of colorimetric, roughness, Shore D hardness, and SEM morphological analyses.
Lightness (L*) and chromatic variation (∆E value) as a function of the recycled amount are plotted in Figure 10a,b, respectively. The evaluation has been done on the square-shaped sheets of the different blends plotted in Figure 2a,b. The evaluation procedure for color measurements is described in detail in the paper of Hejna et. al. [26].
The L* and ΔE* values of the white PBSv reference sheet were 72.55 and 0, respectively. The PBSv/PBSr blends exhibit only minor changes in lightness (from 72.55 to approximately 80) and color difference (ΔE*, from 0 to ~8) relative to the reference sheet of Figure 2a,b. In contrast, the PBSv/MIXr blends display a more pronounced variation in both parameters. The photographs reveal progressive darkening, from light brown tones to increasingly darker brown shades, as the proportion of MIXr in the blend increases, approaching the darkness observed in neat MIXr. Lightness (L*) decreases from 72.55 to 41.85 in PBSv/MIXr40 compared to PBSv (Figure 2a).
As previously discussed, the chromatic variation (ΔE*) of the PBSv/PBSr blends changes only slightly with the addition of recycled material. Conversely, the ΔE* of PBSv/MIXr blends increases substantially, reaching approximately 30 points relative to the initial color (Figure 2c). Similarly to the color results, surface roughness also changes in the blends compared to PBSv (Figure 2e). Detailed data are reported in Table S4 of the Supplementary Information. For the PBSv/PBSr blends, surface roughness increased by ~4% in PBSv-PBSr2 (0.73 μm) and ~25% in PBSv-PBSr40 (0.88 μm), relative to PBSv (0.70 μm). Greater variations were observed in the PBSv/MIXr blends: roughness increased by ~9% in PBSv-MIXr2 (0.77 μm) and ~32% in PBSv-MIXr40 (0.93 μm), relative to PBSv (0.70 μm). These differences are attributed to the presence of agro-food waste in MIXr, ranging from 0.6 wt.% to 12 wt.%, and to the higher degradation of the PBSv-MIXr compared to PBSv-PBSr blends. Hardness (Figure 10c,d) grows with the recycled amount, according to the Young modulus before discusses, from 55.29 HD in PBSv-PBSr2 to 60.15 HD in PBSv-PBSr40 (+8.8%) and from 56.92 HD in PBSv-MIXr2 to 63.98 HD in PBSv-MIXr40 (+12.4%).

4. Conclusions

Fully biobased PBS pots offer several attractive features for horticultural applications and can serve as a sustainable alternative to conventional fossil-based polyolefin pots. Their recyclability has been investigated by reintroducing recycled material into a virgin PBS matrix after approximately two years of warehouse storage.
Two recycled fractions were considered: PBSr, obtained from neat PBS injection-molded pots, and MIXr, derived from PBS/BSG biocomposite pots containing 30 wt.% brewer’s spent grain (BSG). Both fractions were incorporated into virgin PBS (PBSv) at concentrations ranging from 2 to 40 wt.%, corresponding to a final BSG content of 0.6–12 wt.% in PBSv–MIXr blends. The resulting materials were evaluated in terms of processability, mechanical behavior, thermal and chemical stability, and surface properties.
The results demonstrate that BSG is the main factor limiting recyclability. PBSv–MIXr blends exhibit higher torque values than PBSv–PBSr systems because the lignocellulosic filler increases melt viscosity. At low recycled contents (2–5 wt.%), chain branching appears to prevail, leading to a torque increase, whereas higher amounts (10–40 wt.%) promote chain scission and a progressive torque reduction, indicative of degradation.
Incorporation of PBSr up to 10 wt.% largely preserves the ductile behavior of virgin PBS, while higher contents (20–40 wt.%) reduce ductility with minimal effect on thermal stability. In contrast, PBSv–MIXr blends exhibit rigid but little deformability (within 20–30% in the PBSv-MIXr2-20 formulations). Thermal stability progressively decreases: -16% in PBS-MIX10, and -22% in PBSv–MIXr40. This experimental evidence suggests that BSG disrupts the structural continuity of the polymer matrix, thus compromising the overall physical and mechanical performance of PBSv.
Recycling does not change the nature of the functional groups of PBS but modifies their concentration because carbonyl and hydroxyl groups increase with recycling. However, the antioxidant activity of lignin partially suppresses carbonyl formation, whereas the hydrophilic character of BSG cannot prevent the accumulation of hydroxyl species. Degradation also increases surface roughness and hardness, in agreement with the stiffness observed in tensile tests.
Although the incorporation of BSG is an effective strategy for the valorization of agro-industrial by-products and the development of sustainable biocomposites, it also introduces significant recycling challenges. Future research will focus on improving the interfacial compatibility between PBS and BSG through naturally derived compatibilizers, replacing conventional maleic-anhydride-based additives while preserving the fully biobased nature of the material and enhancing its long-term recyclability.
These results are particularly relevant for industrial applications in which commercial pots are recovered after prolonged use or storage. Considering that the European horticultural pot market accounts for several billion units annually, effective recycling strategies for these products could substantially reduce plastic waste and virgin polymer consumption, contributing to lower greenhouse gas emissions and supporting circular economy practices in the nursery sector.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.; methodology, A.V., G.S. and C.S.; validation, A.V., G.S. and C.S.; formal analysis, G.S., C.S. and S.B; investigation, G.S., C.S. and S.B; data curation, A.V., G.S., C.S. and S.B; writing—original draft preparation, A.V., G.S., and S.B writing—review and editing, A.V., G.S., and S.B.; visualization, A.V. and S.B.; supervision, A.V.; funding acquisition, A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the LIFE RESTART (LIFE21-ENV-IT-LIFE RESTART/101074314) for financial support.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The Authors wish to thank the LIFE RESTART project (https://fdcmessina.org/life-restart/?l_lan=en), all project partners, and the stakeholders involved. In particular, the Authors would like to thank EcoBuddy brand of Ecosmed (https://www.ecosmed.it/ecobuddy) for pellet production, Mr. Francesco Magistro of MAVI s.a.s., a stakeholder of the project for plant pot production, and Giardineria Italiana, project partner, for providing the photographs taken at their nurseries (https://giardineriaitaliana.it/).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Beghetto, V.; Gatto, V.; Samiolo, R.; Scolaro, C.; Brahimi, S.; Facchin, M.; Visco, A. Plastics today: Key challenges and EU strategies towards carbon neutrality: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 122102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rhodes, C.J. Plastic pollution and potential solutions. In Sci Prog; 2018; Volume 101, pp. 207–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Visco, A.; Scolaro, C.; Facchin, M.; Brahimi, S.; Belhamdi, H.; Gatto, V.; Beghetto, V. Agri-food wastes for bioplastics: European prospective on possible applications in their second life for a circular economy. Polymers 2022, 14, 2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. https. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cruz, R.M.S.; Krauter, V.; Krauter, S.; Agriopoulou, S.; Weinrich, R.; Herbes, C.; Scholten, P.B.V.; Uysal-Unalan, I.; Sogut, E.; Kopacic, S.; Lahti, J.; Rutkaite, R.; Varzakas, T. Bioplastics for Food Packaging: Environmental Impact, Trends and Regulatory Aspects. Foods 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Falzarano, M.; Marìn, A.; Cabedo, L.; Polettini, A.; Pomi, R.; Rossi, A.; Zonfa, T. Alternative end-of-life options for disposable bioplastic products: Degradation and ecotoxicity assessment in compost and soilAlternative end-of-life options for disposable bioplastic products: Degradation and ecotoxicity assessment in compost and soil. Chemosphere 2024, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Huang, S.; Dong, Q.; Che, S.; Li, R.; Tang, K.H.D. Bioplastics and biodegradable plastics: A review of recent advances, feasibility and cleaner production. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 969, 178911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Plastiche biodegradabili complete a confronto: PHA, PHB, PBAT, PLA, PBS, PCL e TPS spiegati. n.d. Available online: https://specialty-polymer.com/it/biodegradable-compared-pha-phb-pbat-pla-pbs-pcl-and-tps/ (accessed on 11 May 2026).
  9. Rosenboom, J.-G.; Langer, R.; Traverso, G. Bioplastics for a circular economy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022, 7, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fredi, G.; Dorigato, A. Recycling of bioplastic waste: A review. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2021, 4, 159–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. https. [CrossRef]
  12. Garofalo, E.; Di Maio, L.; Scarfato, P.; Vitiello, L.; Incarnato, L. Mechanical recycling of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(lactide) blends: Assessment of film blowing processability and film performances after multiple extrusions. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 505, 159823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barletta, M.; Genovesi, A.; Desole, M.P.; Gisario, A. Melt processing of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) (PBS)—a critical review. Clean. Techn Env. Policy 2025, 27, 683–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mantia, F.P.L.; Botta, L.; Mistretta, M.C.; Fiore, A.D.; Titone, V. Recycling of a Biodegradable Polymer Blend. Polymers 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nomadolo, N.; Mtibe, A.; Ofosu, O.; Mekoa, C.; Letwaba, J.; Muniyasamy, S. The Effect of Mechanical Recycling on the Thermal, Mechanical, and Chemical Properties of Poly (Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate) (PBAT), Poly (Butylene Succinate) (PBS), Poly (Lactic Acid) (PLA), PBAT-PBS Blend and PBAT-TPS Biocomposite. J. Polym. Env. 2024, 32, 2644–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, J.; Hirschberg, V.; Pollard, M.; Wilhelm, M.; Rodrigue, D. Effect of mechanical recycling on the rheological and mechanical properties of bio-based and bio-degradable polybutylene succinate. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 209, 107741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gigante, V.; Aliotta, L.; Botta, L.; Bavasso, I.; Guzzini, A.; Gabrielli, S.; Sarasini, F.; Tirillò, J.; Lazzeri, A. Impact of Multiple Mechanical Recycling Cycles via Semi-Industrial Twin-Screw Extrusion on the Properties of Polybutylene Succinate (PBS). Polymers 2025, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dintcheva, N.T.; Infurna, G.; Scolaro, C.; Liberto, E.A.D.; Ltayef, M.; Visco, A. Recycling of PBS and PBS Bio-Composites Containing Organic By-Product Waste. Polymers 2025, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Di Lorenzo, M.L.; Androsch, R.; Righetti, M.C. Low-temperature crystallization of poly(butylene succinate). Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 94, 384–391. [Google Scholar]
  20. https. [CrossRef]
  21. Panagiotopoulos, C.; Kapageridou, E.; Karamitrou, M.; Korres, D.M.; Charitidis, C.A.; Vouyiouka, S.N. Recycling/Upcycling of Physically Aged Poly(butylene succinate) into PBS Vitrimers through Zn(II)-Catalyzed Melt Vitrimerization. Macromolecules 2024, 57, 5747–5768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tolcha, S.D.; Scolaro, C.; Visco, A. PBAT/PLA bio-composites reinforced with four lignocellulosic industrial wastes: A comparative study of thermo-mechanical behavior. Ind. Crops Prod. 2026, 247, 123443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. https. [CrossRef]
  24. Visco, A.; Bardella, N.; Scolaro, C.; Belhamdi, H.; Brahimi, S.; Gatto, V.; Samiolo, R.; Beghetto, V. Reuse of beer spent grain for the industrial production of biodegradable bio-composites. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 235, 121684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. https. [CrossRef]
  26. Visco, A.; Scolaro, C.; Oliveri, F.; Ruta, A.J. Mathematical Modelling of Tensile Mechanical Behavior of a Bio-Composite Based on Polybutylene-Succinate and Brewer Spent Grains. Polymers 2024, 16, 2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. portoantico, THE FLORICULTURE AND NURSERY SECTOR IS WORTH MORE THAN 3 BILLION EUROS, EuroFlora (2025). Available online: https://www.euroflora.genova.it/en/the-floriculture-and-nursery-sector-is-worth-more-than-3-billion-euros/ (accessed on 11 May 2026).
  28. Tunhe PBS for Xinjiang Blueridge Tunhe Chemical Industry Co.,Ltd | UL Prospector. Available online: https://www.ulprospector.com/Plastics/en/datasheet/290232/tunhe-pbs-th803s/ (accessed on 23 March 2025).
  29. PBS(Polybutylene succinate)_Bio-Polymers_products_English. n.d. Available online: https://www.lanshantunhe.com/en/product/biodegradable_polymer/500.html/ (accessed on 1 July 2026).
  30. Aldhafeeri, T.; Alotaibi, M.; Barry, C.F. Impact of Melt Processing Conditions on the Degradation of Polylactic Acid. Polymers 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Velghe; Buffel, B.; Vandeginste, V.; Thielemans, W.; Desplentere, F. Review on the Degradation of Poly(lactic acid) during Melt Processing. Polymers 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. E2550 Standard Test Method for Thermal Stability by Thermogravimetry. Available online: https://store.astm.org/e2550-21.html/ (accessed on 2 July 2026).
  33. Belhamdi, H.; Kouini, B.; Grasso, A.; Scolaro, C.; Sili, A.; Visco, A. Tribological behavior of biomedical grade UHMWPE with graphite-based fillers against EBM-Ti6Al4V pin under various lubricating conditions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2022, 139, 52313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hejna, A.; Aniśko-Michalak, J.; Skórczewska, K.; Barczewski, M.; Sulima, P.; Przyborowski, J.A.; Cieśliński, H.; Marć, M. Brewers’ Spent Grain from Different Types of Malt: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Appearance, Structure, Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial Activity, and Volatile Emissions. Molecules 2025, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Santos, R.M.; Costa, A.R.M.; Almeida, Y.M.B.; Carvalho, L.H.; Delgado, J.M.P.Q.; Lima, E.S.; Magalhães, H.L.F.; Gomez, R.S.; Leite, B.E.; Rolim, F.D.; Figueiredo, M.J.; Lima, A.G.B. Thermal and Rheological Characterization of Recycled PET/Virgin HDPE Blend Compatibilized with PE-g-MA and an Epoxy Chain Extender. Polymers 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cusano; Campagnolo, L.; Aurilia, M.; Costanzo, S.; Grizzuti, N. Rheology of Recycled PET. Materials 2023, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Georgousopoulou, I.-N.; Vouyiouka, S.; Dole, P.; Papaspyrides, C.D. Thermo-mechanical degradation and stabilization of poly (butylene succinate). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 128, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Scolaro, C.; Brahimi, S.; Falcone, A.; Beghetto, V.; Visco, A. Mechanical and Physical Changes in Bio-Polybutylene-Succinate Induced by UVC Ray Photodegradation. Polymers 2024, 16, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Visco, A.; Scolaro, C.; Brahimi, S.; Conca, S.; Beghetto, V. Effect of α-tocopherol on the processability, tensile properties, and structure of fully bio-based poly (butylene succinate)/Brewer’s spent grain composites. Mater. Today Commun. 2026, 53, 115413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, L.; Yu, J.; Cheng, L.; Qu, W. Mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) biocomposites reinforced with surface modified jute fibre. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2009, 40, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Platnieks, O.; Gaidukovs, S.; Barkane, A.; Sereda, A.; Gaidukova, G.; Grase, L.; Thakur, V.K.; Filipova, I.; Fridrihsone, V.; Skute, M. Bio-based poly (butylene succinate)/microcrystalline cellulose/nanofibrillated cellulose-based sustainable polymer composites: Thermo-mechanical and biodegradation studies. Polymers 2020, 12, 1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mussatto, S.I.; Roberto, I.C. Chemical characterization and liberation of pentose sugars from brewer’s spent grain. J. Chem. Tech Amp Biotech. 2006, 81, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cassoni, A.C.; Costa, P.; Mota, I.; Vasconcelos, M.W.; Pintado, M. Recovery of lignins with antioxidant activity from Brewer’s spent grain and olive tree pruning using deep eutectic solvents. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 192, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sadeghifar, H.; Ragauskas, A.J. Lignin as a Natural Antioxidant: Chemistry and Applications. Macromol 2025, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sanches, M.A.R.; Augusto, P.E.D.; Polachini, T.C.; Telis-Romero, J. Water sorption properties of brewer’s spent grain: A study aimed at its stabilization for further conversion into value-added products. Biomass Bioenergy 2023, 170, 106718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. White commercial pots made from virgin PBS and used as reference material (a); brown pots made from PBS containing 30 wt.% BSG (b); brown pots in a nursery (c). Materials: PBSv pellets. (I) provided by Tunhe Sci.&Tech. Co[23] (a); PBSr flakes (II), obtained by crushing pots made from PBS (b); MIXr flakes (III) obtained by crushing pots made from PBS/BSG - 70/30 (wt./wt.) (c).
Figure 1. White commercial pots made from virgin PBS and used as reference material (a); brown pots made from PBS containing 30 wt.% BSG (b); brown pots in a nursery (c). Materials: PBSv pellets. (I) provided by Tunhe Sci.&Tech. Co[23] (a); PBSr flakes (II), obtained by crushing pots made from PBS (b); MIXr flakes (III) obtained by crushing pots made from PBS/BSG - 70/30 (wt./wt.) (c).
Preprints 221765 g001
Figure 2. Photographs of PBSv-PBSr 0-2-5-10-20-30-40 (a) and of PBSv-MIXr0-2-5-10-20-30-40 (b) sheets.
Figure 2. Photographs of PBSv-PBSr 0-2-5-10-20-30-40 (a) and of PBSv-MIXr0-2-5-10-20-30-40 (b) sheets.
Preprints 221765 g002
Figure 3. (a) Photos of commercial injection-molded plant pots made in polybutylene succinate (PBS), polypropylene (PP), recycled high-density polyethylene (r-HDPE), prototype of PBS-BSG30 investigated in this paper (b). Mechanical tensile comparison of the tensile parameters of the plant pots: young modulus (E), tensile strength at yielding (σy ) and at break (σr), elongation at break (εr).
Figure 3. (a) Photos of commercial injection-molded plant pots made in polybutylene succinate (PBS), polypropylene (PP), recycled high-density polyethylene (r-HDPE), prototype of PBS-BSG30 investigated in this paper (b). Mechanical tensile comparison of the tensile parameters of the plant pots: young modulus (E), tensile strength at yielding (σy ) and at break (σr), elongation at break (εr).
Preprints 221765 g003
Figure 4. Torque curves vs mixing time of all the studied samples: PBSv, PBSr, and PBSv-PBSr (a), and PBSv, MIXr, and PBSv-MIXr (b). Torque after 6 minutes of PBSs-PBSr and PBSs-MIXr vs the percentage of recycled amount (c).
Figure 4. Torque curves vs mixing time of all the studied samples: PBSv, PBSr, and PBSv-PBSr (a), and PBSv, MIXr, and PBSv-MIXr (b). Torque after 6 minutes of PBSs-PBSr and PBSs-MIXr vs the percentage of recycled amount (c).
Preprints 221765 g004
Figure 5. Stress-strain curves of PBSs-PBSr blends (a) and of PBSs-MIXr blends (b). Young modulus (c), elongation at break (d), Strength at break (e), and work at break(f) of PBSs-PBSr blends and of PBSs-MIXr blends.
Figure 5. Stress-strain curves of PBSs-PBSr blends (a) and of PBSs-MIXr blends (b). Young modulus (c), elongation at break (d), Strength at break (e), and work at break(f) of PBSs-PBSr blends and of PBSs-MIXr blends.
Preprints 221765 g005
Figure 6. SEM microscopy at 1000x of PBSv (a), PBSr (b), MIXr(c)
Figure 6. SEM microscopy at 1000x of PBSv (a), PBSr (b), MIXr(c)
Preprints 221765 g006
Figure 7. SEM Analysis at 1000x of PBSv-PBSr X (left column), and PBSv-MIXr X (right column) with X ranging between 2wt.% and 40 wt.
Figure 7. SEM Analysis at 1000x of PBSv-PBSr X (left column), and PBSv-MIXr X (right column) with X ranging between 2wt.% and 40 wt.
Preprints 221765 g007
Figure 8. TGA (a,c) and DTGA (b,d) of PBSv, PBSr, MIXr, and of PBSv/PBSr and PBSs-MIXr blends.
Figure 8. TGA (a,c) and DTGA (b,d) of PBSv, PBSr, MIXr, and of PBSv/PBSr and PBSs-MIXr blends.
Preprints 221765 g008
Figure 9. Carboxyl index (a) and hydroxyl index (b) vs. recycled amount.
Figure 9. Carboxyl index (a) and hydroxyl index (b) vs. recycled amount.
Preprints 221765 g009
Figure 10. Lightness, L* (a), chromatic variation, ∆E (b), roughness, Ra (c), Shore-D hardness (d), vs the recycled amount, of all the sheets.
Figure 10. Lightness, L* (a), chromatic variation, ∆E (b), roughness, Ra (c), Shore-D hardness (d), vs the recycled amount, of all the sheets.
Preprints 221765 g010
Table 1. Code, description, production and testing date, MFR, and melt density of the materials used in this research.
Table 1. Code, description, production and testing date, MFR, and melt density of the materials used in this research.
Code Description Production
date
Testing
date
MFR (g/10min) Melt density
(g/cm3)
PBSv Virgin
PBS
26/05/2022 24/11/2025 37.36 ±1.63 1.00 ± 0.02
PBSr Recycled PBS 27/02/2024 25/11/2025 159.06 ±7.14 0.99 ± 0.13
MIXr Recycled
PBS (70wt.%) +
BSG (30wt.%)
27/02/2024 17/11/2025 153.24 ± 29.71 1.20 ± 0.06
Table 2. Samples’ composition and torque.
Table 2. Samples’ composition and torque.
Code PBSv (%) PBSr (%) MIXr
(%)
Amount of BSG in MIXr
(%)
Amount of PBS in MIXr
(%)
Torque after 6 min (Nm)
PBSv 100 - - - - 3940±12
PBSr - 100 - - 100 0.46 ±0.15
MIX - - 100 30 70 1161±8
PBSv-PBSr2 98 2 - - - 4829±8
PBSv-PBSr5 95 5 - - - 4415±9
PBSv-PBSr10 90 10 - - - 3838±12
PBSv-PBSr20 80 20 - - - 3524±18
PBSv-PBSr30 70 30 - - - 2339±8
PBSv-PBSr40 60 40 - - - 1993±15
PBSv-MIX2 98 - 2 0.6 1.4 4596±11
PBSv-MIX5 95 - 5 1.5 3.5 4853±17
PBSv-MIX10 90 - 10 3 7 4376±10
PBSv-MIX20 80 - 20 6 14 4401±16
PBSv-MIX30 70 - 30 9 21 2927±6
PBSv-MIX40 60 - 40 12 28 2590±18
v= virgin, r= recycled, MIX = PBS (70wt.%) + BSG (30wt.%).
Table 3. FTIR signal peaks of PBS and BSG.
Table 3. FTIR signal peaks of PBS and BSG.
BSG PBS
Signal Wavenumber
(cm-1)
Attribution Signal Wavenumber
(cm-1)
Attribution
Interval 3600-3200 Hydroperoxide, hydroxyl groups B 2962 vs (CH)
A 3281 vs (OH) D 2857 vs (CH)
C 2920 vs (CH) F 1713 vas (C=O)
E 2852 vs (CH) I 1473 δ (CH) in (CH2)
G 1736 vas (C=O) L 1152 vas (C-O)
H 1630 vs (C=O) M 1044 vs (C-O)
N 1032 δ (C-O)
vs= symmetric stretching; vas=asymmetric stretching; δ=bending.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated

Accessibility

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings