Submitted:
01 July 2026
Posted:
02 July 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
- How is spare parts demand characterized in the aviation MRO industry?
- What are the methods used in spare parts management in the aviation MRO industry?
- How is aircraft maintenance demand considered in aircraft spare parts management?
- How does aircraft parts management impact sustainability in the aviation industry?
3. Results
3.1. Characterization of Spare Parts Demand in the Aviation MRO Industry
3.2. Methods Used in Spare Parts Management in the Aviation MRO Industry
3.3. Spare Parts Management and Maintenance Demand
3.4. Aircraft Parts Management and Sustainability in the Aviation Industry
4. Discussion
4.1. Spare Parts Demand Forecasting Challenges
4.2. Methods Used in Spare Parts Management in the Maintenance Aviation Industry
4.3. Spare Parts Management and Maintenance Demand
4.4. Aircraft Parts Management and Sustainability in the Aviation Industry
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Haroun, A.E.; Duffuaa, S.O. Maintenance Organization. In Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering; Ben-Daya, M., Duffuaa, S.O., Raouf, A., Knezevic, J., Ait-Kadi, D., Eds.; Springer: London, 2009; pp. 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şahin, M.; Eldemir, F.; Turkyilmaz, A. Inventory Cost Minimization of Spare Parts in Aviation Industry. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, vol. 59, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dendauw, P.; Goeman, T.; Claeys, D.; Turck, K.D.; Fiems, D.; Bruneel, H. Condition-based critical level policy for spare parts inventory management. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, vol. 157, 107369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hafner, Y.; Bock, J.; Keppler, C.; Fottner, J. Evaluation model for cooperative inventory pooling-systems. Procedia CIRP 2021, vol. 104, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, V.P.; Ganguly, K.K. A supporting framework for estimating trade-off between cost and availability at equipment level: development and application in the aircraft MRO industry. Prod. Plan. Control 2024, vol. 35, 808–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, M.; Luo, Y.; Li, H. Configuration model of partial repairable spares under batch ordering policy based on inventory state. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2014, vol. 27, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakmak, E.; Guney, E. Spare parts inventory classification using Neutrosophic Fuzzy EDAS method in the aviation industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, vol. 224, 120008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, V.F.; Salsabila, N.Y.; Siswanto, N.; Kuo, P.-H. A two-stage Genetic Algorithm for joint coordination of spare parts inventory and planned maintenance under uncertain failures. Appl. Soft Comput. 2022, vol. 130, 109705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regattieri, A.; Gamberi, M.; Gamberini, R.; Manzini, R. Managing lumpy demand for aircraft spare parts. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2005, vol. 11, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinnison, H.; Siddiqui, T. Aviation Maintenance Management, Second Edition, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, N.Y, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Dinis, D.; Barbosa-Póvoa, A.; Teixeira, Â.P. Valuing data in aircraft maintenance through big data analytics: A probabilistic approach for capacity planning using Bayesian networks. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, vol. 128, 920–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Márquez, A.C. “The Maintenance Concept,” in The Maintenance Management Framework: Models and Methods for Complex Systems Maintenance; Springer London: London, 2007; pp. 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Daya, M.; Duffuaa, S.O.; Raouf, A.; Knezevic, J.; Ait-Kadi, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering; Springer London: London, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syntetos, A.A.; Boylan, J.E.; Croston, J.D. On the categorization of demand patterns. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2005, vol. 56, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diallo, C.; Ait-Kadi, D.; Chelbi, A. Integrated Spare Parts Management. In Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering; Ben-Daya, M., Duffuaa, S.O., Raouf, A., Knezevic, J., Ait-Kadi, D., Eds.; Springer London: London, 2009; pp. 191–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Liu, W.; Zeng, T.; Guo, L.; Qin, Y.; Wang, X. An Improved Stacking Model for Equipment Spare Parts Demand Forecasting Based on Scenario Analysis. Sci. Program. 2022, vol. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, F.; Diao, J.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, D.; Sun, Q. A double-level combination approach for demand forecasting of repairable airplane spare parts based on turnover data. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2017, vol. 110, 92–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. “Chapter 2 - Basic Concepts,” in Reliability Based Aircraft Maintenance Optimization and Applications; Ren, H., Chen, X., Chen, Y., Eds.; Academic Press, 2017; pp. 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Affonso, T.B.; Conceição, S.V.; Muniz, L.R.; De Freitas Almeida, J.F.; De Lima, J.C. A new hybrid forecasting method for spare part inventory management using heuristics and bootstrapping. Decis. Anal. J. 2024, vol. 10, 100415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, H.; Baboli, A.; Shahzad, M.K.; Tonadre, R. A new methodology to optimize target stock level for unpredictable demand of spare parts: A Case Study in Business Aircrafts’ Industry. IFAC-Pap. 2018, vol. 51, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szent István University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Páter Károly street 1., 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary, K. Mészáros, M. F. Gergely, Szent István University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Páter Károly street 1., 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary, M. Czikkely, and Szent István University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Páter Károly street 1., 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary, SUSTAINABILITY OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN OF SERVICES IN AVIATION. presented at the 4th International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2020 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, 2020; pp. 121–128. [CrossRef]
- Ramírez, X.S.; Solorio, X.G.; Paredes, M.P.; Sifuentes, C.T. Proposal for an Improvement Model to Reduce Aircraft Spare Parts Overstock Based on ABC Methodology and Neural Network Forecasting in an Air Service Company in Peru. 2024 Congreso Internacional de Innovación y Tendencias en Ingeniería (CONIITI), Bogotá, Colombia, 2024; IEEE; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Li, M.; Xu, G.; Huang, G.Q. Cyber-physical spare parts intralogistics system for aviation MRO. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2023, vol. 56, 101919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baisariyev, M.; et al. “Demand forecasting methods for spare parts logistics for aviation: a real-world implementation of the Bootstrap method”. Procedia Manuf. 2021, vol. 55, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Momani, H.; Al Meanazel, O.T.; Kwaldeh, E.; Alaween, A.; Khasaleh, A.; Qamar, A. The efficiency of using a tailored inventory management system in the military aviation industry. Heliyon 2020, vol. 6, e04424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qin, Y.; Ma, H.-L.; Chan, F.T.S.; Khan, W.A. A scenario-based stochastic programming approach for aircraft expendable and rotable spare parts planning in MRO provider. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2020, vol. 120, 1635–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.; Jaarsveld, W.V.; Dekker, R. Spare parts inventory control based on maintenance planning. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2020, vol. 193, 106600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinis, D.; Barbosa-Póvoa, A.; Teixeira, Â.P. A supporting framework for maintenance capacity planning and scheduling: Development and application in the aircraft MRO industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, vol. 218, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayu Nariswari, N.P.; Bamford, D.; Dehe, B. Testing an AHP model for aircraft spare parts. Prod. Plan. Control 2019, vol. 30, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costantino, F.; Di Gravio, G.; Patriarca, R.; Petrella, L. Spare parts management for irregular demand items. Omega 2018, vol. 81, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.; Dekker, R.; Van Jaarsveld, W.; Renjie, R.W.; Koning, A.J. An improved method for forecasting spare parts demand using extreme value theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, vol. 261, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yongquan, S.; Xi, C.; He, R.; Yingchao, J.; Quanwu, L. Ordering decision-making methods on spare parts for a new aircraft fleet based on a two-sample prediction. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2016, vol. 156, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Jaarsveld, W.; Dollevoet, T.; Dekker, R. Improving spare parts inventory control at a repair shop. Omega 2015, vol. 57, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, K.W. Efficient aircraft spare parts inventory management under demand uncertainty. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2015, vol. 42, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi Zanjani, M.; Nourelfath, M. Integrated spare parts logistics and operations planning for maintenance service providers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, vol. 158, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romeijnders, W.; Teunter, R.; Van Jaarsveld, W. A two-step method for forecasting spare parts demand using information on component repairs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, vol. 220, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Zuo, H. Multi-echelon inventory optimal model of civil aircraft spare parts. In 2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference; IEEE: Xuzhou, China, 2010; pp. 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Sun, L.; Guo, C. Aero-Material Consumption Prediction Based on Linear Regression Model. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018, vol. 131, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, A. Digital Twin-driven Supply Chain Planning. Procedia CIRP 2020, vol. 93, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mobarakeh, N.A.; Shahzad, M.K.; Baboli, A.; Tonadre, R. Improved Forecasts for uncertain and unpredictable Spare Parts Demand in Business Aircraft’s with Bootstrap Method. IFAC-Pap. 2017, vol. 50, 15241–15246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kharlov, A.; Tolujevs, J.; Ovezmyradov, B. “Suitability of Inventory Policies for Supply of Spare Parts in Aviation Industry,” in Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, vol. 913. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, 2024; vol. 913. pp. 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, P.; Kulkarni, M.S.; Yadav, V. A simulation based optimization approach for spare parts forecasting and selective maintenance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2017, vol. 168, 274–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Syntetos, A.A. Spare parts demand: Linking forecasting to equipment maintenance. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2011, vol. 47, 1194–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babai, M.Z.; Chen, H.; Syntetos, A.A.; Lengu, D. A compound-Poisson Bayesian approach for spare parts inventory forecasting. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, vol. 232, 107954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Croston, J.D. Forecasting and Stock Control for Intermittent Demands. Oper. Res. Q. 1970-1977 1972, vol. 23, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowas, A.F.; Ciarallo, F.W. Reliability and operations: Keys to lumpy aircraft spare parts demands. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2016, vol. 50, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hur, M.; Keskin, B.B.; Schmidt, C.P. End-of-life inventory control of aircraft spare parts under performance based logistics. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, vol. 204, 186–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Márquez, A.C. “Maintenance Management Characterization: Process, Framework and Supporting Pillars,” in The Maintenance Management Framework: Models and Methods for Complex Systems Maintenance; Springer London: London, 2007; pp. 11–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weide, T.V.D.; Deng, Q.; Santos, B.F. Robust long-term aircraft heavy maintenance check scheduling optimization under uncertainty. Comput. Oper. Res. 2022, vol. 141, 105667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, B.; Suh, J.H. Forecasting Spare Parts Demand of Military Aircraft: Comparisons of Data Mining Techniques and Managerial Features from the Case of South Korea. Sustainability 2020, vol. 12, 6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teunter, R.H.; Duncan, L. Forecasting intermittent demand: a comparative study. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2009, vol. 60, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Wingerden, E.; Basten, R.J.I.; Dekker, R.; Rustenburg, W.D. More grip on inventory control through improved forecasting: A comparative study at three companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, vol. 157, 220–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syntetos, A.A.; Boylan, J.E. On the bias of intermittent demand estimates. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2001, vol. 71, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keivanpour, S.; Kadi, D.A. The Effect of ‘Internet of Things’ on Aircraft Spare Parts Inventory Management. IFAC-Pap. 2019, vol. 52, 2343–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurcahyo, R.; Malik, F.M.; Farizal. Aircraft spare parts inventory management using multi-criteria classification with AHP approach. In 2017 4th IEEE International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences (ICETAS); IEEE: Salmabad, 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rad, T.; Shanmugarajan, N.; Wahab, M.I.M. Classification of critical spares for aircraft maintenance. In ICSSSM11; IEEE: Tianjin, China, 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, G.; Ke-qiang, H.; Yu-ming, H.; Wen-fang, Q. Control modeling of an aircraft spare parts inventory and the optimal study. In Proceedings of the 2011 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), May 2011; pp. 3644–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, J.; Luo, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Wang, X. Determination of key components in automobile braking systems based on ABC classification and FMECA. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. Engl. Ed. 2022, vol. 9, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hekimoğlu, M.; Kök, A.G.; Şahin, M. Stockout risk estimation and expediting for repairable spare parts. Comput. Oper. Res. 2022, vol. 138, 105562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larin, D. “Defining the Best Model to Forecast Aviation Spare Parts with Little Transaction History,” in Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, vol. 195. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; vol. 195. pp. 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Pater, I.; Mitici, M. Predictive maintenance for multi-component systems of repairables with Remaining-Useful-Life prognostics and a limited stock of spare components. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, vol. 214, 107761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, J.; Prescott, D. Optimising spare parts provision and inspection intervals for an aircraft fleet undergoing cannibalisation. Saf. Reliab. 2016, vol. 36, 88–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bülbül, P.; Bayındır, Z.P.; Bakal, İ.S. Exact and heuristic approaches for joint maintenance and spare parts planning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, vol. 129, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaughan, T.S. Failure replacement and preventive maintenance spare parts ordering policy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2005, vol. 161, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kontrec, N.Z.; Milovanović, G.V.; Panić, S.R.; Milošević, H. A Reliability-Based Approach to Nonrepairable Spare Part Forecasting in Aircraft Maintenance System. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, vol. 2015, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenzhevayeva, Z.; Katayeva, A.; Kaikenova, K.; Sarsembayeva, A.; Babai, M.Z.; Tsakalerou, M.; Papadopoulos, C.T. Inventory control models for spare parts in aviation logistics. FAIM 2021, vol. 55, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sleptchenko, A.; Van Der Heijden, M. Joint optimization of redundancy level and spare part inventories. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2016, vol. 153, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regattieri, A.; Giazzi, A.; Gamberi, M.; Gamberini, R. An innovative method to optimize the maintenance policies in an aircraft: General framework and case study. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2015, vol. 44–45, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. Reliability based aircraft maintenance optimization and applications. In Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press Aerospace Series; Academic press: San Diego, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cardeal, G.; Leite, M.; Ribeiro, I. Decision-support model to select spare parts suitable for additive manufacturing. Comput. Ind. 2023, vol. 144, 103798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; He, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, X. Joint optimization of job scheduling, condition-based maintenance planning, and spare parts ordering for degrading production systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2024, vol. 252, 110447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, G.T.S.; Tang, Y.M.; Tsang, K.Y.; Tang, V.; Chau, K.Y. A blockchain-based system to enhance aircraft parts traceability and trackability for inventory management. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, vol. 179, 115101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nafiurridha; Choiruddin, A. Classifying MRP Strategy of Aircraft Spare Parts Using Supervised Machine Learning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2024, vol. 234, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheikh, M.F.; Padmanabhan, R.; Hadid, M.; Kerbache, L. Towards Additive Manufacturing Enabled Sustainable Spare Parts Supply Chain: A Multi-Objective MILP Model for Cost and Carbon Emissions Minimization. Procedia Comput. Sci. vol. 253, 952–963, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Nikou, S.; Santema, S. Sustaining aviation: A decision-tree framework for recycling aircraft cabin interiors. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2026, vol. 136, 103038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anagnostopoulou, A.; Sotiropoulos, D.; Sioutis, I.; Tserpes, K. Sustainability-Driven Design Optimization of Aircraft Parts Using Mathematical Modeling. Aerospace 2026, vol. 13, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimme, W.; Kumar, S. The green energy transition in air transport – an analysis of supply chains for hydrogen and sustainable aviation fuels. Transp. Res. Procedia 2026, vol. 94, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keyvandarian, A.; Pirnia, M.; Scott, D. Robust optimal design of sustainable aviation fuel supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2026, vol. 216, 111929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.Y.; Shahabuddin, M.; Ahmed, S.F.; Tan, J.X.; Ali, S.M. Optimizing sustainable aviation fuel supply chains: challenges, mitigation strategies and modeling advances. Fuel 2025, vol. 402, 135972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhmatova, M.-S.; Deniskina, A.; Akhmatova, D.-M.; Kapustkina, A. Green SCM and TQM for reducing environmental impacts and enhancing performance in the aviation spares supply chain. Transp. Res. Procedia 2022, vol. 63, 1505–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiesner, M.; Mügge, J.; Steiner, J.; Klumski, J.; Riedelsheimer, T.; Lindow, D.-I.K. Integrating Circular Economy Practices in Aviation: Requirements Analysis for the Exchange of Material and Product Information to improve Circularity in the Aviation Industry. Procedia CIRP 2025, vol. 136, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorgham, M.; Hadid, M.; Kerbache, L.; Baldacci, R. Optimization of Air Navigation Spare Parts Supply Chain. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2026, vol. 277, 2261–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Pan, X.; Wang, L.; Wei, W. Method of Spare Parts Prediction Models Evaluation Based on Grey Comprehensive Correlation Degree and Association Rules Mining: A Case Study in Aviation. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018, vol. 2018, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tracht, K.; Mederer, M.; Schneider, D. Queueing of Seasonally Demanded Spare Parts in a Repair Shop of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain. In Advances in Sustainable Manufacturing; Seliger, G., Khraisheh, M.M.K., Jawahir, I.S., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011; pp. 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habib, M.A.; Subeshan, B.; Kalyanakumar, C.; Asmatulu, R.; Rahman, M.M.; Asmatulu, E. Current Practices in Recycling and Reusing of Aircraft Materials and Equipment. Mater. Circ. Econ. 2025, vol. 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Qin, Y.; Sun, H. Research on Location Selection Strategy for Airlines Spare Parts Central Warehouse Based on METRIC. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2021, vol. 2021, 4737700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- den Boer, J.; Lambrechts, W.; Krikke, H. Additive manufacturing in military and humanitarian missions: Advantages and challenges in the spare parts supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, vol. 257, 120301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paletti, L.; Markatos, D.; Pantelakis, S.; Filippatos, A. Assessing Circularity Performance in Aircraft Component Design using ISO 59004:2024. J. Circ. Econ. 2026, vol. 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mügge, J.; et al. “Establishing digital data ecosystems for circular economy solutions in the automotive and aviation industries”. Procedia CIRP vol. 135, 1373–1378, 2025. [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Dekker, R.; Heij, C.; Hekimoğlu, M. Assessing End-Of-Supply Risk of Spare Parts Using the Proportional Hazard Model. Decis. Sci. 2016, vol. 47, 373–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Ref. | Country | Year | Objectives | Methods | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [22] | Peru | 2024 | Ensures effective inventory classification | Neural networks for forecasting spare parts demand. ABC methodology. | Demand forecast accuracy improvement. |
| [23] | China | 2023 | Addresses Spare Parts Intralogistics (SPI) synchronization problems. | Demonstration case (spare parts management department at company H). The company’s SPI uses delivery points to support maintenance work. Visits and interviews (7 participants: requesters, end-users and SPI teams). Implementation of Cyber-Physical Spare Parts Intralogistics System (CPSPIS). | Resource utilization is improved with CPSPIS. SPI business processes synchronization is facilitated with CPSPIS. Work efficiency can be improved given the ability of CPSPIS to synchronize business processes and resources. |
| [24] | Kazakhstan, France and Greece |
2021 | Tests the Bootstrap method and develops a Decision Support System. | Implementation of the Bootstrap forecasting method. Test if the prediction of the Bootstrap method corresponds to real demand, given selected lead times. Regression analysis. Development of a Decision Support System so that maintenance personnel can obtain relevant information. | For spare parts with intermittent demand pattern, the Bootstrap method showed very accurate results. For spare parts with lumpy demand, the Bootstrap method results were not as highly accurate as with spare parts with intermittent demand pattern. |
| [25] | Jordan | 2020 | Sets an inventory management system. Improves operational availability. | Inventory Management System customization. Integration of Maintenance Management Systems. |
Demonstrated that Inventory Management Systems (IMS) can be developed for systems‘ maintenance. The IMS increases efficiency, forecast accuracy for distinct time lengths and reduces cases of AOG, being useful to calculate inventory quantity needs and to highlight deficiency of materials. |
| [26] | China, Hong Kong | 2020 | Proposes a model and approach that assists MRO procurement and overhaul management and minimizes the impact of uncertain maintenance demands. | Stochastic model. Benders decomposition algorithm. Comparion between the Benders decomposition algorith and a default branch-and-bound algorithm. Computational experiment and analysis. | The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm was demonstrated. Benders decomposition algorithm increases convergence speed. |
| [27] | Belgium and the Netherlands |
2019 | Creates a forecasting mechanism to estimate the distribution of spare parts demand. Develops an inventory control method. | Data analysis (data from Fokker Services and Netherlands Railways). Comparative evaluation between the proposed approach and benchmarks. Use of maintenance information as a source of Advance Demand Information (ADI) for spare parts inventory control. |
The Advanced Demand Information (ADI)-based forecast showed better results than time series methods concerning forecast accuracy. ADI presented advantages in Root Mean Square Error and Mean Absolute Deviation. The proposed approach avoids redundant inventory and has the potential to reduce costs by 23% (train maintenance) to 51% (aircraft maintenance). |
| [28] | Portugal | 2019 | Suggests a Framework for Aircraft Maintenance Estimation (FRAME). | Application of a 3-Dimensional Maintenance Data Analysis method. Use of maintenance estimation indicators to assess expected maintenance potential impact (e.g., spare parts quantity). Quantitative assessment of aircraft maintenance projects from a Portuguese MRO. | FRAME addresses spare parts management problem by integrating maintenance activities planning/scheduling and resources availability (e.g., spare parts). Unscheduled maintenance work can be 198% of scheduled workload. Throughout the duration of the service life of an aircraft, there is an increase of the ratio between unscheduled and scheduled workloads. |
| [29] | Indonesia and UK |
2019 | Maintains aircraft operational availability and reduces downtime. |
Develop a multi-criteria model for aircraft spare parts based on 9 interviews (3 from airlines, 3 from engineering and maintenance department and 3 from the material department). Classification test. Data analysis (1267 part numbers). Comparison between the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model and current practice (Mathematical model, Mathematical and Engineering adjustment) and Current Inventory. |
Considering the MRO dependency on spare parts availability, the proposed AHP model leads to a practical aircraft spare parts classification, by aggregating qualitative and quantitative criteria. AHP classification accuracy is high, since its outcome is consistent with current precise methods. AHP vs Math Model: 80.6% similarity. AHP vs Math Model and Engineering Adjustment Method: 97.6% similarity. AHP vs Current inventory: 63.7% similarity. |
| [30] | Italy | 2017 | Suggests a model to optimize inventory allocation for spare parts with irregular demand. | Presentation of METRIC. Single-site model analysis where a machine may represent an aircraft (possible scenario representation of a maintenance outsourcing service). Proposal and application of Zero-Inflated Poisson and Multi Echelon Technique for Recoverable Item Control (ZIP-METRIC). Data analysis (1745 items of an airline). Simulation study. Item classification for ZIP-METRIC and METRIC. |
METRIC-like models may present accuracy limitations for high irregular demand. ZIP-METRIC defines an inventory level closer to a real case when compared to METRIC. ZIP-METRIC presents better performance compared to the traditional Poisson-based approach. |
| [31] | The Netherlands |
2017 | Proposes (for spare parts) a Lead Time Demand forecasting method. | Development of the empirical Extreme Value Theory method as a combination of the non-parametric empirical method and empirical Extreme Value extrapolation. Simulation study (CM demand only or combined with PM demand). Empirical study (automotive case and aircraft case). | Simulation results indicated that the empirical Extreme Value Theory method performs relatively well but presents some challenges when there is limited demand history. When compared to the empirical method, the proposed method improves inventory performance. |
| [32] | China | 2016 | Presents an approach for spare parts ordering. | Analysis of policies for spare parts and demand ordering decisions (new aircraft fleet). Failure time and number prediction. Classical and Bayesian methods results analysis. Analysis of data (supplier) and maintenance records (airlines). |
Bayesian prediction outcomes were more accurate (by including testing and historical data). Fleet size and the length of the prediction interval affect spare parts demand rate. |
| [33] | The Netherlands |
2015 | Supports inventory analysts. |
Development of a model and an algorithm for inventory support. Computational analysis. Implementation of a spare parts algorithm in a decision-support system at a repair shop (Fokker Services). Comparison results analysis between the implemented method and a benchmark method. | Repair shop performance must be measured not on spare parts level, but on component repair level. The benchmark method was unable to achieve the intended performance for 52% of the highly critical components and showed costs 33% higher. Inventory control improvement with the implementation of the method at the repair shop. |
| [34] | Canada | 2014 | Creates a spare parts inventory model. Reduces downtime and high inventory holding cost. |
Presentation of a basic model and development of an improved model. Results analysis for iterative and general algebraic modeling system approaches. Numerical examples. Sensitivity analysis on how the optimal solution is affected. Comparison of models (basic vs improved). | Computational results show that inventory cost can be significantly reduced with the proposed basic model. Compared to traditional methods, the proposed mathematical models may be more appropriate because they consider parts aging and focus on impending demands. |
| [35] | Canada | 2014 | Addresses spare parts logistics (third-party maintenance provider). | Development of models: deterministic and stochastic. Numerical experiments. Comparison between the multi-stage stochastic programming model, the mean-value deterministic model and a robust optimization (deterministic worst-case scenario) model. |
It was concluded that the spare parts inventory plan must be coordinated with maintenance operations. The robust optimization model suggested higher costs. The deterministic model lacks efficiency on spare parts order quantity. MSP model performed better compared to mean-value deterministic and robust optimization models. |
| [36] | The Netherlands |
2012 | Proposes a method that considers spare parts demand and what type of component is repaired. | Data analysis (Fokker Services). Consideration of 3 spare parts categories (very-slow, slow and fast moving). Studied methods: Two-Step (2S), Simple Exponential Smoothing (ES), Moving Average (MA), Croston (CR), Syntetos-Boylan Approximation (SBA), Teunter-Syntetos-Babai (TSB), Zero Forecast (ZF) and Naïve Forecast (NF). Comparative study (forecasting methods results). Simulation study (2S and ES). |
By using information from planned maintenance and repairs, 2S may reduce forecasting errors by up to 20%. 2S helps distinguish changes on demand: component demand vs needs for parts per repair. In the empirical study, 2S did not outperform ES. The performance measure (Root Mean Square Error, Mean Absolute Deviation and Mean Error) showed that for very-slow and slow-moving spare parts, 2S produced close results to ES, MA and TSB and outperformed CR. For fast moving spare parts, 2S, ES, MA, CR, SBA and TSB produced close results. |
| [37] | China | 2010 | Determines spare parts stock level (multi-item and multi-echelon system) | Allocation of average demand to distinct line stations. Implementation of a model based on METRIC model. Marginal analysis. Numerical example. | Driving backorders to a minimum is nearly smiliar to maximizing product availability. The proposed approach efficiency is observed on the computational results. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).