Submitted:
23 June 2026
Posted:
24 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Related Works
3. Methods
3.1. Hardware Architecture

3.2. EEG Signal Acquisition and Preprocessing
3.3. Feature Extraction
- 1.
- Frequency-domain analysis, such as estimating power spectral density.
- 2.
- Time-frequency analysis (such as wavelet decomposition or the short-time Fourier transform).

3.4. Deep Learning-Based Classification
3.5. Real-Time Command Execution and Communication
3.6. System Evaluation
3.7. Validation of the Idea
4. System Design
4.1. Hardware Design
- 1.
- EEG Electrodes: EEG electrodes are dry or wet electrodes that are discreetly and comfortably positioned along the frontal and temporal regions of the head to record neural signals.
- 2.
- Signal Amplification and Conditioning: Weak EEG signals are amplified and filtered by onboard analog front-end circuitry to reduce noise and interference.
- 3.
- Microcontroller Unit (MCU): A small, low-power MCU with compute capacity appropriate for embedded AI inference and the ability to perform real-time EEG sampling, initial preprocessing, and data buffering.
- 4.
- Wireless Communication Module: Support for MQTT permits integration with smart environments, while integrated Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) permits secure communication with external devices.
- 5.
- Power Management: Long-term use without frequent charging is made possible by a rechargeable battery and effective power regulation.
- 6.
- Form Factor: To preserve the look and functionality of conventional eyewear, electronics and electrodes are integrated into ergonomically designed eyeglass frames.
4.2. Software Design
- – To separate pertinent EEG frequency bands, band-pass filter (1–40 Hz) is used.
- – 50/60 Hz notch filtering is used to eliminate power-line interference.
- – Adaptive thresholding and statistical cleaning are used to eliminate artifacts, which lessen noise from muscle activity and blinks.
- – Continuous EEG is segmented into overlapping epochs in order to extract and classify features.
- – Frequency-domain characteristics that capture the energy distribution across the EEG bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) include power spectral density.
- – Time-frequency transforms, like wavelet decomposition or the Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT), are used to examine fleeting brain activity.
- – Each feature vector is categorized into mental commands (such as left, right, and idle) by a small 1D CNN that is optimized for embedded inference.
- – The CNN is installed on the MCU for real-time prediction after being trained offline using publicly accessible datasets.
- – To safely control external devices, recognized commands are sent via BLE or MQTT..
- – Unintentional device activation is prevented by safety and reliability checks.
- – To verify command recognition and system status, it is planned to incorporate visual or audio feedback into the glasses.
5. Validation
6. Result
7. Discussion
8. Challenges
- 1.
- EEG Signal Quality:Reliable signal acquisition is challenging outside of controlled environments due to dry electrodes’ sensitivity to noise from movement, perspiration, and irregular skin contact.
- 2.
- Limited Command Set:Three commands are currently supported by the system. It is challenging to increase to 5–10 commands because of overlapping neural patterns and constrained EEG channels.
- 3.
- Real-World Usability:Public datasets are used for current validation. Due to weariness, distractions, and improper electrode placement, real users introduce variability, necessitating user trials and adaptive algorithms.
- 4.
- Embedded AI Constraints:Deep learning requires low-power microcontrollers, resulting in trade-offs between latency, accuracy, and model size.
- 5.
- Power Consumption:Wearability is impacted by battery life due to continuous acquisition, processing, and wireless communication.
- 6.
- User Calibration:Because EEG differs from person to person, it needs to be calibrated and trained, which makes it more difficult for non-technical users to adopt.
- 7.
- Social Acceptance: People may find it awkward to wear EEG-equipped glasses in public, despite their discrete form factor.
9. Future Work
- 1.
- Expanded Command Set and Adaptive Algorithms: Increase the number of consistently distinguishable mental commands from the current three to five to ten. This calls for gathering more EEG datasets, refining feature extraction, and investigating cutting-edge neural network architectures. For better personalization, adaptive learning will enable the model to adapt in response to user input.
- 2.
- Robustness and Dry Electrode Optimization: When employing dry electrodes, enhance the quality of the EEG signal. In order to manage movement, perspiration, and irregular skin contact, future research will involve testing out novel electrode materials, fine-tuning electrode positioning, and implementing sophisticated artifact rejection.
- 3.
- Hardware Miniaturization and Ergonomic Design: Pay attention to cutting down on component size, power consumption, and improving the eyeglass frame for comfort and social acceptance. A larger user base will find it more usable if prescription lenses are supported.
- 4.
- Real-World User Trials: To assess usability, comfort, and learning curve in everyday settings, switch from dataset-based validation to testing with actual users. Trial results will inform changes to the user interface, calibration, and feedback systems (auditory, visual, or haptic).
- 5.
- Enhanced Smart Environment Integration: Increase interoperability with a range of smart devices through secure communication. Examine hybrid control models that use voice or gesture input in addition to EEG as a fallback mode.
- 6.
- Privacy, Security, and Ethical Considerations: Because neural data is sensitive, strong data privacy safeguards, secure command execution, and moral data handling procedures will all be part of future development.
10. Limitations
- 1.
- Signal Quality and Reliability: Motion artifacts and noise can affect non-invasive EEG with dry electrodes, making recognition less consistent in practical applications.
- 2.
- Limited Command Vocabulary: There are currently only three commands supported by the system. The limited EEG resolution and overlapping neural patterns make it challenging to expand to more commands.
- 3.
- Dataset Dependency: Validation relies on publicly available datasets gathered under controlled conditions, which might not translate to real-world variability like weariness or improper electrode positioning.
- 4.
- Personalization and Calibration: Since each user’s EEG is unique, calibration and possibly retraining are necessary, which adds to the setup work.
- 5.
- Embedded Hardware Constraints: Model complexity and future scalability are restricted when deep learning is conducted on low-power microcontrollers.
- 6.
- Battery and Power Management: Wearability and battery life are impacted by wireless communication, continuous EEG acquisition, and processing.
- 7.
- User Comfort and Social Acceptance: More work is needed to ensure the long-term comfort and widespread acceptance of EEG-equipped eyewear.
11. Conclusion
References
- Lee, S. The future of EEG. Journal Biomed. Informatics 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Y. Transfer Learning for Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Euclidean Space Data Alignment Approach. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2020, vol. 67(no. 2), 399–410. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M. U.; Hasan, M. A. H. Hybrid EEG-fNIRS BCI Fusion Using Multi Resolution Singular Value Decomposition (MSVD). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2020, vol. 14(Article 599802), 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Lou, Q.; Liu, W. Mindreading: Photonic accelerator for EEG. in Proceedings of SPIE, 2020; vol. (verify specific volume), paper ID (verify). [Google Scholar]
- Schirrmeister, R. T.; Springenberg, J. T.; Fiederer, L. D. J.; Glasstetter, M.; Eggensperger, K.; Tangermann, M.; Hutter, F.; Burgard, W.; Ball, T. Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization. Human Brain Mapping 2017, vol. 38(no. 11), 5391–5420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frey, S.; Benini, L. GAPses: Versatile smart glasses for EEG/EOG. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Q.; Li, Y. An EEG/EOG-based hybrid brain–computer interface. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2019, vol. 13(no. 6), 1641–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kosmyna, N.; Maes, P. AttentivU: Closed-loop biofeedback. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. (IMWUT) 2019, vol. 3(no. 3, Article 95), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolas-Alonso, L. F.; Gomez-Gil, J. Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review. Sensors 2012, vol. 12(no. 2), 1211–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.; Jo, S. Hybrid-BCI smart glasses for device control. Journal Neural Eng.> 2015, vol. 12(no. 6), 066019, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).