Submitted:
16 June 2026
Posted:
18 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Modeling the Spatial Dependence of Rice Yield
3.2. Descriptive Statistics of Soil Attributes and Rice Yield
3.3. Correlation Analysis
3.4. Principal Component Analysis
3.5. Yield Classes and Comparison of Means
4. Discussion
4.1. Soil Fertility Gradients and Rice Yield Formation
4.2. Redox-Induced Fe and Mn Dynamics as Yield-Limiting Factors
4.3. Implications for Precision Agriculture and Site-Specific Management
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ribas, G.G.; Heinemann, A.B.; Stone, L.F.; Castro, A.P.; Streck, N.A.; Santos, A.B.; Silva, M.R.; Steinmetz, S.; Soares, C.F.; Zanon, A.J. Rice-based cropping systems in Brazil: Irrigated and rainfed. Crop Environ. 2025, 4, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durigon, R.; Schlosser, J.F.; Russini, A.; Dornelles, M.E. de. C.; Pinheiro, E.D. Correlações entre atributos químicos do solo e atributos da cultura e da produtividade do arroz irrigado. Ciênc. Rural 2009, 39, 2629–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trevisan, R.G.; Bullock, D.S.; Martin, N.F. Spatial variability of crop responses to agronomic inputs in on-farm precision experimentation. Precis. Agric. 2021, 22, 342–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Ju, H.; Ma, Q.; Sun, C.; Lv, Y.; Liu, K.; Wu, T.; Cheng, M. Rice Yield Estimation Using Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Data and Machine Learning: A Case Study of Jiangsu, China. Agriculture 2024, 14, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrestha, J.; Kandel, M.; Shah, K.K. Role of nutrients in rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review. Agrica 2020, 9, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radmann, V.; Sousa, R.O. de.; Weinert, C.; Jordão, H.W.C.; Carlos, F.S. Soil solution and rice nutrition under liming and water management in a soil from Amazonian natural fields. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2023, 47, e0220101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirchhof, G.; Priyono, S.; Utomo, W.H.; Adisarwanto, T.; Dacanay, E.V.; So, H.B. The effect of soil puddling on the soil physical properties and crop performance under rice cultivation. Soil Tillage Res. 2000, 56, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boie, F.; Shaheen, S.M.; Kandeler, E.; Rinklebe, J. Controlled redox potentials and flooding duration affect microbial community composition and biomass in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem 2025, 211, 109962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Kronzucker, J.H.; Li, G. Exploring the complexities of rice iron toxicity: Paradoxes, mechanisms, and strategic deliberations. J. Plant Physiol. 2025, 314, 154601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramos, F.T.; Dores, E.F.C.; Weber, O.L.D.S.; Beber, D.C.; Campelo Junior, J.H.; Maia, J.C.S. Soil organic matter doubles the cation exchange capacity of tropical soil under no-till farming in Brazil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 3595–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silva, L.S. da.; Ranno, S.K. Calagem em solos de várzea e a disponibilidade de nutrientes na solução do solo após o alagamento. Ciênc. Rural 2005, 35, 1054–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, B.; Kumawat, K.C.; Tiwari, S.; Kumar, A.; Dar, R.A.; Singh, U.; Cardinale, M. Silicon and plant nutrition-dynamics, mechanisms of transport and role of silicon solubilizer microbiomes in sustainable agriculture: A review. Pedosphere 2023, 33, 534–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalchiavon, F.C.; Carvalho, M. de P. e.; Andreotti, M.; Montanari, R. Variabilidade espacial de atributos da fertilidade de um Latossolo Vermelho Distroférrico sob Sistema Plantio Direto. Rev. Ciênc. Agron. 2012, 43, 453–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montanari, R.; Pereira, G.T.; Marques Júnior, J.; de Souza, Z.M.; Pazeto, R.J.; Camargo, L.A. Variabilidade espacial de atributos químicos em latossolo e argissolos. Ciênc. Rural 2008, 38, 1266–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z.; Yin, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, D.; Huang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, T.; Zhao, M.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y. Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Nutrient in Principal Paddy and Cereal Production Landscapes of Fengtai County within the Huai River Basin, Eastern China. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gazolla-Neto, A.; Fernandes, M.C.; Vergara, R. de O.; Gadotti, G.I.; Villela, F.A. Spatial distribution of the chemical properties of the soil and of soybean yield in the field. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 2016, 47, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molin, J.P. Definição de unidades de manejo a partir de mapas de produtividade. Engen. Agric. 2002, 22, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
- Valente, D.S.M.; Pereira, G.W.; de Queiroz, D.M.; Zandonadi, R.S.; Amaral, L. R. d.; Bottega, E.L.; Costa, M.M.; de Freitas Coelho, A.L.; Grift, T. Accuracy of Various Sampling Techniques for Precision Agriculture: A Case Study in Brazil. Agriculture 2024, 14, 2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva Júnior, J.F.; da Silva, T.T.; Sousa, D.J. da S.; Tavares, R.L.M.; de Souza, B.D.L.; Pinheiro, D.P. Delineation of potential management zones for cowpea by factorial kriging and spatial Fuzzy C-Means of yield and soil chemical and texture properties. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2025, 49, e0230158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, M.A.B.; Parfitt, J.M.B.; Timm, L.C.; Faria, L.C.; Scivittaro, W.B. Produtividade de arroz irrigado por aspersão em terras baixas em função da disponibilidade de água e de atributos do solo. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2016, 51, 1584–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ten Caten, A.; Dalmolin, R.S.D.; Pedron, F.A.; Mendonça-Santos, M. de L. Estatística multivariada aplicada à diminuição do número de preditores no mapeamento digital do solo. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2011, 46, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CPRM—Serviço Geológico do Brasil. Mapa Geodiversidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul; Escala 1:750,000; Available online; CPRM: Porto Alegre, Brazil; RIGeo – Mapa Geodiversidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, 2009; (accessed on 2 June 2026). [Google Scholar]
- Streck, E.V.; Kämpf, N.; Dalmolin, R.S.D.; Klamt, E.; Nascimento, P.C.; Giasson, E.; Pinto, L.F.S. Solos do Rio Grande do Sul, 3rd ed., rev. and expanded; Emater/RS-Ascar: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2018; p. 252 p. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236965550_Solos_do_Rio_Grande_do_Sul (accessed on 2 June 2026).
- IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014: International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2014; ISBN 978-92-5-108370-3. [Google Scholar]
- Soil Survey Staff. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, Available online, 2nd ed.; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA; USDA Soil Taxonomy, 1999; (accessed on 2 June 2026)Agriculture Handbook No. 436. [Google Scholar]
- Counce, P.; Keisling, T.C.; Mitchell, A.J. A uniform, objective, and adaptive system for expressing rice development. Crop Sci. 2000, 40, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SOSBAI – Sociedade Sul-Brasileira de Arroz Irrigado. Arroz irrigado: recomendações técnicas da Pesquisa para o Sul do Brasil, 33 ed.; Sociedade Sul-Brasileira de Arroz Irrigado: Cachoeirinha; Cachoeirinha, Brasil, 2022; p. 200p. [Google Scholar]
- Menegatti, L.A.A.; Molin, J.P. Remoção de erros em mapas de produtividade via filtragem de dados brutos. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2004, 8, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, G.W.; Valente, D.S.M.; Queiroz, D.M.D.; Coelho, A.L.D.F.; Costa, M.M.; Grift, T. Smart-Map: An open-source QGIS plugin for digital mapping using machine learning techniques and ordinary kriging. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molin, J.P. Definição de unidades de manejo a partir de mapas de produtividade. Engen. Agric. 2002, 22, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
- Kaiser, H.F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960, 20, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartlett, M.S. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br. J. Psychol. 1950, 3, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrestha, J.; Kandel, M.; Shah, K.K. Role of nutrients in rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review. Agrica 2020, 9, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upadhyaya, H.; Begum, L.; Dey, B.; Nath, P.K.; Panda, S.K. Impact of Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles on Rice Plant. J. Plant Sci. Phytopathol. 2017, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamichhane, S.; Tarpley, L.; Dou, F. Impact of Excess Magnesium Salt Supply on Rice Yield, Physiological Response, and Grain Mineral Content. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arinzechi, C.; Huang, P.; Ping, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, Q.; Tang, C.; Si, M.; Li, Q.; Yang, Z. Calcium-magnesium synergy in reducing cadmium bioavailability and uptake in rice plants. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2025, 27, 832–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amado, T.J.C.; Pes, L.Z.; Lemainski, C.L.; Schenato, R.B. Atributos químicos e físicos de latossolos e sua relação com os rendimentos de milho e feijão irrigados. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2009, 33, 831–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo (CQFS-RS/SC). Manual de Adubação e de Calagem para os Estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina, 11th ed.; Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo—Núcleo Regional Sul: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2016; p. 376 p. [Google Scholar]
- Guindani, R.H.P.; Anghinoni, I.; Nachtigall, G.R. DRIS na avaliação do estado nutricional do arroz irrigado por inundação. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2009, 33, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suriyagoda, L.; Sirisena, D.; Somaweera, K.; Dissanayake, A.; Costa, W.A.J.M. de.; Lambers, H. Incorporation of dolomite reduces iron toxicity, enhances growth and yield, and improves phosphorus and potassium nutrition in lowland rice (Oryza sativa L). Plant Soil 2017, 410, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajonandraina, T.; Ueda, Y.; Wissuwa, M.; Kirk, G.J.D.; Rakotoson, T.; Manwaring, H.; Andriamananjara, A.; Razafimbelo, T. Magnesium supply alleviates iron toxicity-induced leaf bronzing in rice through exclusion and tissue-tolerance mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1213456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, H.; Nkoh, J.N.; Biswash, R.M.; Hua, H.; Dong, G.; Li, J.; Xu, R. Effects of surface charge and chemical forms of manganese (II) on rice roots on manganese absorption by different rice varieties. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 207, 111224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidt, F.; Fortes, M.; de, Á.; Wesz, J.; Buss, G.L.; Sousa, R. The impact of water management on iron toxicity in flooded rice. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 2013, 37, 1226–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dossou-Yovo, E.R.; Kouadio, S.A.K.; Saito, K. Effects of mid-season drainage on iron toxicity, rice yield, and water productivity in irrigated systems in the derived savannah agroecological zone of West África. Field Crops Res. 2023, 296, 108901, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, M.S.; Sanglard, L.M.V.P.; Barbosa, M.L.; Namorato, F.A.; Melo, D.C.; Franco, W.C.G.; Pérez-Molina, J.P.; Martins, S.C.V.; DaMatta, F.M. Silicon nutrition mitigates the negative impacts of iron toxicity on rice: evidence for improved photosynthesis and yield under excess Fe. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 125983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Attribute | Unit | Min. | Mean | Max. | SD | VC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield Rice | t ha-1 | 8.12 | 10.35 | 12.62 | 1.03 | 9.9 |
| Clay | % | 26 | 31 | 40 | 3.42 | 11.2 |
| pH H2O | - | 4.8 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 0.18 | 3.6 |
| O.M. | % | 2.38 | 2.93 | 3.75 | 0.33 | 11.1 |
| Phosphorus | mg dm-3 | 2.43 | 3.51 | 4.34 | 0.43 | 12.2 |
| Potassium | mg dm-3 | 60 | 88 | 137 | 18.40 | 21.0 |
| Calcium | cmolc dm-3 | 5.82 | 7.06 | 9.14 | 0.80 | 11.4 |
| Magnesium | cmolc dm-3 | 1.80 | 2.67 | 3.44 | 0.38 | 14.5 |
| Sulfur | mg dm-3 | 7.20 | 8.63 | 10.4 | 0.72 | 8.4 |
| Zinc | mg dm-3 | 0.73 | 1.26 | 1.97 | 0.32 | 25.1 |
| Copper | mg dm-3 | 2.93 | 5.10 | 7.47 | 1.13 | 22.1 |
| Boron | mg dm-3 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.05 | 10.8 |
| Iron | mg dm-3 | 149 | 181 | 213 | 15.80 | 8.7 |
| Sodium | mg dm-3 | 24.9 | 28.54 | 32.97 | 1.74 | 6.1 |
| Manganese | mg dm-3 | 41 | 73 | 103 | 12.95 | 17.8 |
| Aluminum | cmolc dm-3 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 42.9 |
| Silicon | mg dm-3 | 17.12 | 30.5 | 39.5 | 5.40 | 17.7 |
| Hydrogen | cmolc dm-3 | 1.65 | 3.85 | 6.41 | 1.00 | 26.1 |
| IWD | cm | 6.55 | 8.22 | 9.72 | 0.75 | 9.1 |
| Variance Components¹ | Principal Component | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |
| Rice yield (t ha-¹) | 0.827 | * | * |
| O.M. (%) | 0.876 | * | * |
| Calcium (CmolC dm³) | 0.869 | * | * |
| Magnesium (CmolC dm³) | 0.745 | * | * |
| Iron (mg dm³) | -0.628 | * | -0.612 |
| Manganese (mg dm³) | -0.775 | * | * |
| Silicon (mg dm³) | 0.671 | * | * |
| Aluminium (CmolC dm³) | * | -0.879 | * |
| Sodium (mg dm³) | * | 0.821 | * |
| Phosphorus (mg dm³) | * | * | 0.668 |
| Sulfur (mg dm³) | * | * | 0.789 |
| pH | * | 0.946 | * |
| Hydrogen (Cmol dm³) | * | -0.935 | * |
| Eigenvalues | 5.221 | 3.022 | 1.684 |
| Proportion (%) | 33.7 | 27.4 | 15.2 |
| Cumulative Proportion (%) | 33.7 | 61.2 | 76.4 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).