Submitted:
11 June 2026
Posted:
12 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Reagents
2.2. Methods
2.3. Statistical Experimental Design
2.3.1. Selection of the Design for the Screening Stage
2.3.2. Selection of the Design for the Optimization Stage
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Photophysical Characterization
3.2. Photodegradation Measurements
3.2.1. Photolysis Direct
3.2.2. Determination of Fe2+, H2O2, pH and SDS Levels
3.3. Experimental Design
3.3.1. Screening by Full Factorial
3.3.2. Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology
3.3.3. Verification of Optimal Conditions
3.4. Kinetic and Mechanistic Analysis
3.4. Application of the Optimized Photo-Fenton Process to Other azo Dyes
4. Conclusions
Data availability
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Al-Tohamy, R.; Ali, S.S.; Li, F.; Okasha, K.M.; Mahmoud, Y.A.-G.; Elsamahy, T.; Jiao, H.; Fu, Y.; Sun, J. A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: Ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 231, 113160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, T.; Repon, Md. R.; Islam, T.; Sarwar, Z.; Rahman, M.M. Impact of textile dyes on health and ecosystem: a review of structure, causes, and potential solutions. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 30, 9207–9242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsukaibi, A.K.D. Various Approaches for the Detoxification of Toxic Dyes in Wastewater. Processes 2022, 10, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataria, J.; Rawat, H.; Tomar, H.; Gaurav, N.; Kumar, A. Azo Dyes Degradation Approaches and Challenges: An Overview. SCIENTIFICTEMPER 2022, 13, 384–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khattab, T.A.; Abdelrahman, M.S.; Rehan, M. Textile dyeing industry: environmental impacts and remediation. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 3803–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J. Fenton/Fenton-like processes with in-situ production of hydrogen peroxide/hydroxyl radical for degradation of emerging contaminants: Advances and prospects. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 404, 124191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernández, A.P.B.; Brandon, P.V.; Azañero, A.J.V. Optimal concentration and efficiency of the photo Fenton system for the treatment of a synthetic textile effluent. Rev. Ambient ÁGua 2023, 18, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, G.A.; Sakai, H. Review on effect of different type of dyes on advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for textile color removal. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yazici Guvenc, S.; Varank, G. Degradation of refractory organics in concentrated leachate by the Fenton process: Central composite design for process optimization. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2021, 15, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pignatello, J.J.; Oliveros, E.; MacKay, A. Advanced Oxidation Processes for Organic Contaminant Destruction Based on the Fenton Reaction and Related Chemistry. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 36, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faust, B.C.; Hoigné, J. Photolysis of Fe (III)-hydroxy complexes as sources of OH radicals in clouds, fog and rain. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General. Top. 1990, 24, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokare, A.D.; Choi, W. Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 275, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yaseen, D.A.; Scholz, M. Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 1193–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, B.; Shu, D.; Cao, S.; Lian, Z.; An, F.; Li, W.; Bai, S. Role of surfactants in the degradation and sustainable dyeing for reactive dyeing wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 410, 125657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jena, G.; Dutta, K.; Daverey, A. Surfactants in water and wastewater (greywater): Environmental toxicity and treatment options. Chemosphere 2023, 341, 140082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.W.; Wang, D.; Tang, Q. Effect of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate on the process of Fenton degradation of 4-chlorophenol. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 55, 1302–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, B.X. Influence of anionic surfactant on the process of electro-Fenton decolorized methyl orange. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 61, 1299–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Badawi, A.M.; Ahmed, S.M.; El-Naggar, A.Y.; El-Zahar, S.M.; Aboul-Gheit, A.K. Chlorophenol wastewater degradation in micellar solutions: A gas chromatographic study. J. Surfact Deterg. 2004, 7, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Cai, L.; Yang, R.; Zhou, Z.; Zeng, G.; Lyu, S. Mechanistic insights into surfactant in enhanced reductive degradation of perchlorinated organic contaminants in Fenton system. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 322, 124220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virdi, J.K.; Dusunge, A.; Handa, S. Aqueous Micelles as Solvent, Ligand, and Reaction Promoter in Catalysis. JACS Au 2024, 4, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalyanasundaram, K. Photochemistry in microheterogeneous systems; Academic Press: Orlando, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Ashraf, U.; Chat, O.A.; Dar, A.A. An inhibitory effect of self-assembled soft systems on Fenton driven degradation of xanthene dye Rhodamine B. Chemosphere 2014, 99, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.; Usman, M.; Shah, A.; Rehman, A. Encapsulation of ethyl violet by anionic-cationic mixed micellar solution: Spectroscopic and conductometric studies. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 629, 127423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunç, S.; Duman, O.; Kancı, B. Spectrophotometric investigation of the interactions between cationic dye (C.I. Basic Yellow 2) and anionic surfactant (sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate) in the premicellar and micellar region. Dye. Pigment. 2012, 94, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Cervilla, R.; Romero, A.; Santos, A.; Lorenzo, D. Surfactant-Enhanced Solubilization of Chlorinated Organic Compounds Contained in DNAPL from Lindane Waste: Effect of Surfactant Type and pH. IJERPH 2020, 17, 4494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamarra-Güere, C.D.; Dionisio, D.; Santos, G.O.S.; Vasconcelos Lanza, M.R.; De Jesus Motheo, A. Application of Fenton, photo-Fenton and electro-Fenton processes for the methylparaben degradation: A comparative study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 106992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, A.; Shahzad, S.; Munir, A.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Khan, G.S.; Shams, D.F.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Rana, U.A. Micelles as Soil and Water Decontamination Agents. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 6042–6074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abdel Nour, C.; Rossignol, S.; Samia, B.; Bou Saad, M.; Dieng, N.K.; Lebarillier, S.; Asia, L.; Monod, A.; Wong-Wah-Chung, P. Hydroxyl radical-initiated degradation kinetics of organic pollutants in surfactant-rich environments. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2025, 27, 3119–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Youssef, N.A.; Shaban, S.A.; Ibrahim, F.A.; Mahmoud, A.S. Degradation of methyl orange using Fenton catalytic reaction. Egypt. J. Pet. 2016, 25, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, M.; Saha, R. Dyes and their removal technologies from wastewater: A critical review. In Intelligent Environmental Data Monitoring for Pollution Management; Elsevier, 2021; pp. 127–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarkwa, J.-B.; Oturan, N.; Acayanka, E.; Laminsi, S.; Oturan, M.A. Photo-Fenton oxidation of Orange G azo dye: process optimization and mineralization mechanism. Env. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quynh, H.G.; Thanh, H.V.; Phuong, N.T.T.; Duy, N.P.T.; Hung, L.H.; Dung, N.V.; Duong, N.T.H.; Long, N.Q. Rapid removal of methylene blue by a heterogeneous photo-Fenton process using economical and simple-synthesized magnetite–zeolite composite. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2023, 31, 103155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urmi, S.A.; Kurny, A.S.W.; Gulshan, F. Decolorization of Methyl Orange Using Mill Scale by Photo-Fenton Reaction. Procedia Eng. 2015, 105, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Wang, L.; Tang, J.; Yang, Z. Optimization of arsenic extraction in rice samples by Plackett–Burman design and response surface methodology. Food Chem. 2016, 204, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Montgomery, D.C. Design and analysis of experiments; John Wiley & Sons, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Brereton, R.G. Chemometrics: Data Driven Extraction for Science; Wiley, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- R. Leardi, Experimental design in chemistry: A tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 652, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parsa, Z.; Motevassel, M.; Khosravi-Nikou, M.R.; Jorfi, S.; Ghasemi, B. Biodegradability enhancement of azo dye Direct Orange-26 using UV/Fenton-like process: optimization using response surface methodology. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 81, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotz, S.; Johnson, N.L. Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution; Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Abbasi, S.; Li, Z.; Dastan, D.; Tao, L. The effect of individual factors, their binary and ternary interactions on photodegradation rate of organic contaminants using photocatalysts based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs): statistical analysis based on ANOVA and RSM. Env. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Mamun, Md. R.; Kader, S.; Islam, Md. S. Solar-TiO2 immobilized photocatalytic reactors performance assessment in the degradation of methyl orange dye in aqueous solution. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asif, M.; Shafiq, M.; Imtiaz, F.; Ahmed, S.; Alazba, A.A.; Hussain, H.N.; Butt, F.N.; Zainab, S.A.; Khan, M.K.; Bilal, M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange from Aqueous Solution Using ZnO by Response Surface Methodology. Top. Catal. 2025, 68, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, B.-L.; Shi, X.-L.; Hu, Q.; Du, M.; Gong, H.; Wang, J.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z. Ultrahigh-Strength Textile Fiber-Supported Schiff Base Copper Complexes for Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2024, 6, 13077–13088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farhan Hanafi, M.; Sapawe, N. A review on the water problem associate with organic pollutants derived from phenol, methyl orange, and remazol brilliant blue dyes. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 31, A141–A150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buxton, G.V.; Greenstock, C.L.; Helman, W.P.; Ross, A.B. Critical Review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (⋅OH/⋅O− in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurado, E.; Fernández-Serrano, M.; Núñez-Olea, J.; Luzón, G.; Lechuga, M. Simplified spectrophotometric method using methylene blue for determining anionic surfactants: Applications to the study of primary biodegradation in aerobic screening tests. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, M.B. Design of Experiments: Applications; BoD – Books on Demand, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmadi, F.; Daneshmehr, M.A.; Rahimi, M. The effect of anionic and cationic surfactants on indicators and measurement of dissociation constants with two different methods. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2007, 67, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karukstis, K.K.; Litz, J.P.; Garber, M.B.; Angell, L.M.; Korir, G.K. A spectral approach to determine location and orientation of azo dyes within surfactant aggregates. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2010, 75, 1354–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oakes, J.; Gratton, P. Solubilisation of dyes by surfactant micelles. Part 1; Molecular interactions of azo dyes with nonionic and anionic surfactants. Color. Technol. 2003, 119, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, R.K.; Bhat, S.N. Interaction of phenazinium dyes and methyl orange with micelles of various charge types. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1996, 106, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ketelaar, J. A. A. C.; van de Stolpe; Gersmann, H.R. Rec. Tray. Chim. 1951, 70, 499. [CrossRef]
- Nazar, M.F.; Shah, S.S.; Khosa, M.A. Interaction of Azo Dye with Cationic Surfactant Under Different pH Conditions. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2010, 13, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, Y.; Lyu, S.; Tang, P.; Jiang, W.; Sun, Y.; Li, M.; Sui, Q. Degradation of trichloroethylene in aqueous solution by sodium percarbonate activated with Fe(II)-citric acid complex in the presence of surfactant Tween-80. Chemosphere 2020, 257, 127223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hąc-Wydro, K.; Mateja, A.; Ożóg, A.; Miśkowiec, P. Influence of metal ions on the aggregation of anionic surfactants. Studies on the interactions between environmental pollutants in aqueous solutions. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 240, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gracia-Pinilla, M.Á.; Ramos-Delgado, N.A.; Rosero-Arias, C.; Sanders, R.; Bartling, S.; Winczewski, J.; Gardeniers, H.; Susarrey-Arce, A. Additive manufacturing of hollow connected networks for solar photo-Fenton-like catalysis. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 3897–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, G.D.F.S.; Gouveia, F.S.; Andrade, A.L.; De Vasconcelos, M.A.; Teixeira, E.H.; Palmeira-Mello, M.V.; Batista, A.A.; Lopes, L.G.D.F.; De Carvalho, I.M.M.; Sousa, E.H.S. Minimal Functionalization of Ruthenium Compounds with Enhanced Photoreactivity against Hard-to-Treat Cancer Cells and Resistant Bacteria. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 14673–14690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, L.; Chatterjee, S.; Naik, D.B.; Adhikari, S. Role of surfactant derived intermediates in the efficacy and mechanism for radiation chemical degradation of a hydrophobic azo dye, 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 298, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, J.; Danish, M.; Gu, X.; Jiang, X.; Ali, M.; Shan, A.; Sui, Q.; Lyu, S. Mechanism of carbon tetrachloride reduction in Fe(II) activated percarbonate system in the environment of sodium dodecyl sulfate. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 266, 118549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad Tajpuriya, G.; Shah, P.; Shahi, N.; Bhattarai, A. UV–Vis studies of methyl red in the presence of sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate/acetone and sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate/acetone/water. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 255, 119646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jirasová, J.; Jiří, B.; Čermáková, L. The effect of surfactants on the acid-base behaviour of methyl red. Part I. A spectrophotometric comparison of the effect of CPB and SDS. Collect.> Czech. Chem. Commun. 1990, 55, 1491–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purkait, M.K.; Maiti, A.; DasGupta, S.; De, S. Removal of congo red using activated carbon and its regeneration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 145, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]







| Factors | Lower limit | Upper limit |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 2 | 5 |
| [H2O2] / mM | 0.1 | 100 |
| [Fe2+] / mM | 0.01 | 0.5 |
| [SDS] / mM | 8.3 | 25 |
| [MO] / mM | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Source | Sum of Squares | Degrees of freedom | Mean Square | F Value | p-value Prob > F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 106.189 | 20 | 5.309 | 454.63 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| pH (A) | 0.469 | 1 | 0.470 | 40.24 | < 0.0001 | |
| Fe2+(B) | 7.691 | 1 | 7.691 | 658.55 | < 0.0001 | |
| H2O2 (C) | 0.049 | 1 | 0.049 | 4.16 | 0.0607 | |
| MO (D) | 0.006 | 1 | 0.007 | 0.57 | 0.4630 | |
| SDS (E) | 1.187 | 1 | 1.187 | 101.63 | < 0.0001 | |
| AB | 2.492 | 1 | 2.492 | 213.41 | < 0.0001 | |
| AC | 0.154 | 1 | 0.153 | 13.13 | 0.0028 | |
| AD | 0.252 | 1 | 0.252 | 21.60 | 0.0004 | |
| AE | 0.138 | 1 | 0.138 | 11.84 | 0.0040 | |
| BC | 0.707 | 1 | 0.707 | 60.59 | < 0.0001 | |
| BD | 0.847 | 1 | 0.847 | 72.54 | < 0.0001 | |
| BE | 0.368 | 1 | 0.367 | 31.50 | < 0.0001 | |
| CD | 0.002 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.22 | 0.6455 | |
| CE | 0.029 | 1 | 0.029 | 2.47 | 0.1385 | |
| DE | 0.714 | 1 | 0.714 | 61.14 | < 0.0001 | |
| A^2 | 5.658 | 1 | 5.658 | 484.48 | < 0.0001 | |
| B^2 | 5.556 | 1 | 5.556 | 475.78 | < 0.0001 | |
| C^2 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.09 | 0.7668 | |
| D^2 | 0.007 | 1 | 0.007 | 0.63 | 0.4394 | |
| E^2 | 0.035 | 1 | 0.035 | 3.04 | 0.1033 | |
| Residual | 0.1635 | 14 | 0.0117 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 0.06391736 | 8 | 0.00798967 | 0.48139 | 0.8331 | not significant |
| Variable | Factor |
Maximum % degradation efficiency range |
| A | pH | 2.46 to 3.03 |
| B | Fe2+ | (0.33 to 1.43) mM |
| C | H2O2 | (9.42 to 298) mM |
| E | SDS | (11.9 to 69.3) mM |
| Medium | H2O | SDS micelles | ||||
| Dyes | MO | MR | CR | MO | MR | CR |
| Degradation Efficiency (%) | 91.7 ± 1.3 | 94.2 ± 1.3 | 72.7 ± 1.1 | 98.4 ± 1.5 | 81.9 ± 1.2 | 94.7 ± 1.4 |
| kap (x 102) min-1 | 37.4 ± 0.9 | 12.7 ± 0.3 | 41.2 ± 0.6 | 115.4 ± 2.9 | 8.4 ± 0.1 | 29.8 ± 1.1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).