Submitted:
06 June 2026
Posted:
09 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Research Significance
1.2. Research Hypothesis
1.3. Sustainability Considerations
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Aggregate
2.2. Asphalt Binder
2.3. Gradation and Mix Design
| Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Marshall Stability | ≥ 8.0 kN |
| Air Voids (AV) | 3–5 % |
| VMA | ≥ 14 % |
| VFA | 65–75 % |
| Flow | 2–4 mm |
2.4. Macro Level Characterization
2.5. Micro-Level Characterization
2.5.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy
2.5.2. Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy
2.5.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
2.6. Mechanical Testing
2.6.1. Rutting Test Using Wheel Tracking Machine
2.6.2. Moisture Susceptibility Test
2.6.3. Dynamic Modulus Test
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Macro Level Characterization
3.1.1. Principle Component Analysis (PCA) for Quarry Aggregate Properties
3.1.2. Normalized Scoring & Ranking
3.2. Micro Level Characterization:
3.2.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy
3.2.2. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy
3.2.3. FTIR Spectroscopy
3.3. Rutting Potential of Asphalt Mixtures
3.4. Moisture Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures
3.5. Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures

3.6. Correlation of Mechanical Properties
3.7. Fatigue Analysis of Asphalt Mixtures
3.8. Performance Interpretation
4. Conclusions
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that the first principal component (PC1) explains 95.96% of the total variance, indicating that the overall differences in aggregate quality among quarries can be effectively captured by a single composite indicator. Quarries like Margalla and Malakand scored highest on PC1, reflecting better physical and mechanical properties, while Besai and Swabi scored lowest, indicating inferior quality. This confirms that PCA can be a reliable tool for ranking aggregate sources based on combined performance attributes.
- The Malakand and Kohat aggregates meet key performance standards and offer technically viable alternatives to Margalla. Utilizing these local sources from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa can reduce long-distance hauling, thereby lowering transportation costs, reducing carbon footprints, and minimizing project delays. This approach promotes sustainable construction practices by preserving depleted resources and encouraging the efficient use of regional materials.
- SEM analysis revealed angular and rough-textured surfaces in both Margalla and Malakand samples, which enhance mechanical interlock and improve rutting resistance.
- Based on EDS results, Margalla and Malakand aggregates, with high calcium content, exhibit superior physical and mechanical properties—high hardness, low impact value, low water absorption, and low porosity. Kohat and Swabi, due to mixed silicate and aluminosilicate content, show moderate hardness, higher impact values, and increased water absorption. Besai, with porous structure and fewer stabilizing elements, has the lowest hardness, highest water absorption, and poor resistance to impact, indicating inferior mechanical performance.
- FTIR analysis identified distinct silicate and carbonate peaks in all samples, with stronger Si–O and CO₃ bands observed in Margalla, followed closely by Malakand. While Kohat aggregates showed slightly weaker signals, the spectral characteristics remained consistent with those typically suitable for use in base and sub-base layers.
- Balanced calcium content enhances adhesion and environmental resistance in Margalla and Malakand aggregates. In contrast, the higher reactive silica content in Swabi, Kohat, and Besai aggregates could affect binder compatibility and moisture susceptibility.
- The Margalla aggregates exhibited superior mechanical strength, with the highest ITS and TSR values, the lowest rutting depth, and highest dynamic modulus, indicating excellent moisture resistance and deformation control. Malakand and Kohat aggregates also showed promising results that suggest their potential as partial alternatives.
- The Malakand sample showed the best fatigue performance, maintaining stable stiffness (~5 MPa) for over 4000 cycles with a gradual hysteresis area rise (~19 units). The Swabi sample was moderate, with stiffness dropping from 7.2 to 3.5 MPa by 2000 cycles and a sharp hysteresis increase after 1200 cycles (~19 units). The Besai sample was poor, reaching peak stiffness (~12.5 MPa) early but failed by 900 cycles, with hysteresis area rising sharply after 500 cycles (~3 units).
- Based on this multi-level evaluation, Malakand and Kohat aggregates may be considered as viable substitutes for Margalla aggregates in secondary and medium-load road applications, though Margalla remains the preferred choice for heavily trafficked pavements and high-stress environments.
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- G. Valdes-Vidal, A. Calabi-Floody, E. Sanchez-Alonso, and R. Miró, "Effect of aggregate type on the fatigue durability of asphalt mixtures," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 224, pp. 124-131, 2019/11/10/ 2019. [CrossRef]
- W. Li, "Research on Three-Dimensional Morphological Characteristics Evaluation Method and Processing Quality of Coarse Aggregate," Buildings, vol. 12, no. 3. [CrossRef]
- F. T. S. Aragão, A. R. G. Pazos, L. M. G. d. Motta, Y.-R. Kim, and L. A. H. d. Nascimento, "Effects of morphological characteristics of aggregate particles on the mechanical behavior of bituminous paving mixtures," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 123, pp. 444-453, 2016/10/01/ 2016. [CrossRef]
- T. Pan, E. Tutumluer, and H. Carpenter Samuel, "Effect of Coarse Aggregate Morphology on Permanent Deformation Behavior of Hot Mix Asphalt," Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 580-589, 2006/07/01 2006. [CrossRef]
- J. Hu, Z. Qian, D. Wang, and M. Oeser, "Influence of aggregate particles on mastic and air-voids in asphalt concrete," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 93, pp. 1-9, 2015/09/15/ 2015. [CrossRef]
- "Aggregate Angularity Effect on Porous Asphalt Engineering Properties and Performance," Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), vol. 73, no. 4, 03/30 2015.
- D. M. Kusumawardani and Y. D. Wong, "The influence of aggregate shape properties on aggregate packing in porous asphalt mixture (PAM)," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 255, p. 119379, 2020/09/20/ 2020. [CrossRef]
- R. P. Jaya, "Effect of Aggregate Shape on the Properties of Asphaltic Concrete AC14," Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), vol. 71, no. 3, 12/07 2014. [CrossRef]
- S. Bessa Iuri, T. F. C. Branco Verônica, B. Soares Jorge, and A. N. Neto José, "Aggregate Shape Properties and Their Influence on the Behavior of Hot-Mix Asphalt," Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 27, no. 7, p. 04014212, 2015/07/01 2015. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhang, X. Li, H. Wang, and J. Chen, “Development of low-carbon engineered cementitious composites incorporating lithium slag: Mechanical properties, microstructural evolution, and life cycle assessment,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 520, Art. no. 145983, 2026.
- F. Gong, Y. Liu, X. Zhou, and Z. You, "Lab assessment and discrete element modeling of asphalt mixture during compaction with elongated and flat coarse aggregates," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 182, pp. 573-579, 2018/09/10/ 2018. [CrossRef]
- Y. Peng and H.-D. Yang, “Aggregate boundary recognition of asphalt mixture CT images based on convolutional neural networks,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1127–1143, 2024. [CrossRef]
- Y. Liu, Z. Qian, M. Gong, D. Zheng, and C. Xu, “Influence of coarse aggregates’ morphological characteristics on the pore structures of skeleton in porous asphalt mixture,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 21, Art. no. e03718, 2024. [CrossRef]
- S. Ren, S. Zeng, Y. Zhou, Y. Peng, and B. Liu, “Image-Based Evaluation Method for the Shape Quality of Stacked Aggregates,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 23, Art. no. 7261, 2025. [CrossRef]
- A. Javadi Moghadam, A. Kiani, R. Naeimaei, S. Malihi, and I. Brilakis, “Video-Based 3D Reconstruction: A Review of Photogrammetry and Visual SLAM Approaches,” Journal of Imaging, vol. 12, no. 3, Art. no. 128, Mar. 2026. [CrossRef]
- N. H. Authority, "Annual Report," Government of Pakistan, Islamabad2023.
- A. Ahmed, M. R. Mehdi, M. A. U. Baig, and M. Arsalan, "The Assessment of Sustainability of Freight Transportation in Pakistan," Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 2593-2608, 2022/06/01 2022. [CrossRef]
- F. Karim, “Alleviating permanent deformation and moisture damage in hot mix asphalt using polypropylene fibers,” Tech. J., Univ. Eng. Technol. (UET) Taxila, vol. 29, no. 3, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://tj.uettaxila.edu.pk/index.php/technical-journal/article/view/2184.
- M. M. Ahmad, L. Liao, S. Nazar, A. Shan, and Z. Khan, "Evaluation of Aggregates from Various Quarries in Pakistan for Applicability in Road Construction," in 1st International Conference on Climate Change and Emerging Trends in Civil Engineering (CCETC 2024), 2024, pp. 20-39: Atlantis Press.
- H. Arshad and Y. J. Qiu, "Evaluation of Dina aggregates for pavement construction in Pakistan," Advanced Materials Research, vol. 548, pp. 239-242, 2012. [CrossRef]
- G. Yaseen, W. S. Alaloul, I. Hafeez, and A. H. Qureshi, "Shape Characterizing of Aggregates Produced through Different Crushing Techniques," Coatings, vol. 11, no. 10. [CrossRef]
- A. D5, "Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials," in D5, American Society for Testing Material, ed. West Conshohocken, PA, United States., 2013b.
- D. ASTM, "Standard test method for softening point of bitumen (ring-and-ball apparatus)," Am. Soc. Test. Mater. West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
- A. D113, "Standard Test Method for Ductility of Bituminous Materials," in D113, American Society for Testing Material, ed. West Conshohocken, PA, United States., 2007.
- Standard Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup Tester, 2018.
- A. D4402, "Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer," in American Society for Testing and Materials, 2015.
- A. Khan, "Decision Tree Machine Learning Approach for the Performance Prediction of Asphalt Mixes Modified with Waste Tyre Metal Fibre," Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 303-314, 2025. [CrossRef]
- F. Tahmoorian, B. Samali, V. W. Y. Tam, and J. Yeaman, "Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Recycled Material for Utilization in Asphalt Mixtures," Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 8. [CrossRef]
- B. Li, C. Zhang, P. Xiao, and Z. Wu, "Evaluation of coarse aggregate morphological characteristics affecting performance of heavy-duty asphalt pavements," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 225, pp. 170-181, 2019/11/20/ 2019. [CrossRef]
- F. Karim and J. Hussain, “Assessing the asphalt binder film thickness in recycled asphalt mixtures using micro-level techniques,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 24, pp.7891, 2021. [Online]. Available: . [CrossRef]
- F. Karim, J. Hussain, and I. Hafeez, “Estimating the asphalt binder film thickness using scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2021, pp. 1–16, 2021. [Online]. Available: . [CrossRef]
- K. M. d. V. Moreira, P. V. G. Oliveira, Ê. P. de Deus, and A. E. B. Cabral, "Alkali-silica reaction: understanding the phenomenon," Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 5, 2021/01/02 2021. [CrossRef]
- C. Zhang, J. Li, M. Yu, Y. Lu, and S. Liu, "Mechanism and Performance Control Methods of Sulfate Attack on Concrete: A Review," Materials, vol. 17, no. 19. [CrossRef]
- J. Custódio, D. Costa, A. B. Ribeiro, and A. S. Silva, "Assessment of potential alkali-silica reactivity of aggregates for concrete," Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 37, pp. 590-597, 2022/01/01/ 2022. [CrossRef]
- D. Wang, L. Pengfei, O. Markus, S. Helge, and J. and Kollmann, "Multi-scale study of the polishing behaviour of quartz and feldspar on road surfacing aggregate," International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 79-88, 2019/01/02 2019. [CrossRef]
- P. Venyite, "Alkali-silica reactions in granite-based aggregates: The role of biotite and pyrite," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 320, p. 126259, 2022/02/21/ 2022. [CrossRef]
- H. Zhang, "Contributions of fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy technologies to the research of asphalt materials: A comprehensive review," Fuel, vol. 371, p. 132078, 2024/09/01/ 2024. [CrossRef]
- E. Ahmadinia, M. Zargar, M. R. Karim, M. Abdelaziz, and E. Ahmadinia, "Performance evaluation of utilization of waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) in stone mastic asphalt," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 36, pp. 984-989, 2012. [CrossRef]
- A. Usman, M. H. Sutanto, N. S. A. Yaro, M. Albuaymi, A. E. Alluqmani, and H. Alanazi, "Effects of γ radiation on rutting and fatigue performance of WPET asphalt mixtures," Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 19, p. e02584, 2023/12/01/ 2023. [CrossRef]
- N. S. A. Yaro, M. Bin Napiah, M. H. Sutanto, A. Usman, and S. M. Saeed, "Performance evaluation of waste palm oil fiber reinforced stone matrix asphalt mixtures using traditional and sequential mixing processes," Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 15, p. e00783, 2021/12/01/ 2021. [CrossRef]
- N. Khan, M. H. Sutanto, I. Khan, S. H. Khahro, and M. A. Malik, "Optimizing coconut fiber-modified hot mix asphalt for enhanced mechanical performance using response surface methodology," Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 15098, 2025/04/29 2025. [CrossRef]
- K. Sapkota, E. Yaghoubi, P. L. P. Wasantha, R. Van Staden, and S. Fragomeni, "Mechanical Characteristics and Durability of HMA Made of Recycled Aggregates," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6. [CrossRef]
- X. Hu, X. Wang, N. Zheng, Q. Li, and J. Shi, "Experimental Investigation of Moisture Sensitivity and Damage Evolution of Porous Asphalt Mixtures," Materials, vol. 14, no. 23. [CrossRef]
- M. R. Islam, M. I. Hossain, and R. A. Tarefder, "A study of asphalt aging using Indirect Tensile Strength test," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 95, pp. 218-223, 2015/10/01/ 2015. [CrossRef]
- M. Liang, "Thermo-rheological behavior and compatibility of modified asphalt with various styrene–butadiene structures in SBS copolymers," Materials & Design, vol. 88, pp. 177-185, 2015/12/25/ 2015. [CrossRef]
- I. Khan, "Evaluating the dynamic response and phase angle behavior of SBS-modified asphalt mixtures for enhanced pavement performance," Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 29480, 2024/11/27 2024. [CrossRef]
- P. Liu, X. Kong, C. Du, C. Wang, D. Wang, and M. Oeser, "Numerical Investigation of the Temperature Field Effect on the Mechanical Responses of Conventional and Cool Pavements," Materials, vol. 15, no. 19. [CrossRef]
- N. Khan, "Thermal Performance Evaluation of PCM-Impregnated Aggregates in Hot Mix Asphalt: Mitigating Urban Heat Island Effects," Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 1-12, 11/30 2024. [CrossRef]
- ASTM C131, "Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine," in American Society for Testing Material, ed. West Conshohocken, PA, United States., 2014b.
- British Standards Institution, Methods for Determination of Elongation Index of Coarse Aggregate, BS 812-105.2:1990, London, U.K.: BSI, 1990.
- British Standards Institution, Testing Aggregates—Part 112: Methods for Determination of Aggregate Impact Value (AIV), BS 812-112:1990, London, U.K.: BSI, 1990.
- ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate, ASTM C88/C88M-24, West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2024.
- ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate, ASTM D5821-17, West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2017.
- ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, ASTM C127-24, West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2024.
- J. Ren and C. and Yin, "Investigating mechanical characteristics of aggregate structure for road materials," International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 372-386, 2022/01/28 2022. [CrossRef]
- T. Feininger, "An introduction to the rock-forming minerals," ed: Mineralogical Association of Canada, 2013.
- H. Leodarta, A. S. El-Ashwah, P. Rath, M. Abdelrahman, and W. G. Buttlar, "Utilization of FTIR-ATR for material characterization and forensic analysis," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 482, p. 141644, 2025/07/04/ 2025. [CrossRef]
- D. G. Henry, J. S. Watson, and C. M. John, "Assessing and calibrating the ATR-FTIR approach as a carbonate rock characterization tool," Sedimentary Geology, vol. 347, pp. 36-52, 2017/01/01/ 2017. [CrossRef]
- J. Madejová and P. Komadel, "Baseline Studies of the Clay Minerals Society Source Clays: Infrared Methods," Clays and Clay Minerals, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 410-432, 2001. [CrossRef]
- I. Khan, "Evaluating and optimizing NBR-modified bituminous mixes: a rheological and RSM-based study," Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 24419, 2024/10/18 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. A. Abbasi, “Districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan,” Wikimedia Commons, Jun. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: Wikimedia Commons File Page. [Accessed: Jun. 5, 2026].















| Property | Value | Standard Deviation (±) | Limits | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penetration (25oC, 1/10th of mm) | 62.4 | 0.56 | 60 - 70 | [22] |
| Softening point (oC) | 49.7 | 0.36 | 49 - 56 | [23] |
| Ductility (cm ) | 103 | 2.00 | >100 | [24] |
| Flash and fire point (oC) | 271, 288 | 2.00 | >230, >250 | [25] |
| Viscosity at 135 oC (Pa.s) | 0.624 | 2.00 | 0.280 - 0.600 | [26] |
| Viscosity at 165 oC (Pa.s) | 0.173 | 0.006 | 0.15 - 0.2 | [26] |
| Aggregate Source | OBC (%) |
Bulk Density (g/cm³) | Marshall Stability (kN) | VMA (%) |
VFA (%) | AV (%) | Dust-to-Binder Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margalla | 4.20 | 2.46 | 14.8 | 15.5 | 76.5 | 3.65 | 1.19 |
| Malakand | 4.43 | 2.44 | 13.9 | 16.2 | 74.0 | 4.22 | 1.13 |
| Kohat | 4.87 | 2.41 | 12.8 | 16.8 | 70.3 | 5.00 | 1.03 |
| Swabi | 5.33 | 2.38 | 11.6 | 17.1 | 68.5 | 5.40 | 0.94 |
| Besai | 5.67 | 2.35 | 10.8 | 17.8 | 65.2 | 6.20 | 0.88 |
| Quarry | Margalla | Malakand | Kohat | Swabi | Besai | Standard | Recommended |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abrasion Value (%) | 21 | 25.7 | 28.6 | 29.3 | 33.7 | ASTM C131[49] | ≤ 30 (base) ≤ 35 (sub-base) |
| Flakiness Index (%) | 4.2 | 7.6 | 8.7 | 12.8 | 14.4 | BS 812-105 [50] | ≤ 25 |
| Elongation Index (%) | 4.6 | 8.7 | 9.2 | 12.4 | 14.3 | BS 812-105 [50] | ≤ 30 |
| Loss in Impact Value (%) | 5.7 | 7.3 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 9.4 | BS 812- 3 [51] | ≤ 30 (wearing course) ≤ 40 (base) |
| Degree of Unsoundness (%) | 5.2 | 8.1 | 9.7 | 9.8 | 11.2 | ASTM C88 [52] | ≤ 18 |
| Fractured Faces (%) | 99.3 | 98.6 | 98.1 | 97.4 | 95.2 | ASTM D582 [53] | ≥ 90 |
| Water Absorption (%) | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.94 | ASTM C127 [54] | ≤ 2.0 |
| Specific Gravity | 2.89 | 2.81 | 2.7 | 2.68 | 2.57 | ASTM C127 [54] | 2.5 – 3.0 |
| Aggregate Source | PC1 Score | PC2 Score | PCA Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margalla | 4.284 | -0.398 | 1 |
| Malakand | 1.481 | 0.132 | 2 |
| Kohat | -0.336 | 0.706 | 3 |
| Swabi | -1.491 | 0.007 | 4 |
| Besai | -3.938 | -0.446 | 5 |
| Principal Component | Variance Explained (%) |
|---|---|
| PC1 | 95.96 |
| PC2 | 2.18 |
| PC3 | 1.33 |
| PC4 | 0.53 |
| PC5 | ~0.00 |
| Quarry | Abrasion | Flakiness | Elongation | Impact Loss | Unsoundness | Fractured Faces | Water Abs. | Specific Gravity | Total Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margalla | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 8.00 |
| Malakand | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 5.79 |
| Kohat | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.25 | 0.71 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 4.11 |
| Swabi | 0.56 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.70 | 0.23 | 0.54 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 3.00 |
| Besai | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Quarry | Total Score | Rating | Performance Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Margalla | 8.00 | Excellent | Best in every category. |
| Malakand | 5.79 | Very Good | Strong runner-up, but lags in Flakiness/Elongation. |
| Kohat | 4.11 | Good | Mid-tier, weaknesses in Unsoundness/Water Absorption. |
| Swabi | 3.00 | Fair | Poor Flakiness/Elongation, decent Impact Loss. |
| Besai | 0.00 | Poor | Worst in all metrics. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).