Submitted:
04 June 2026
Posted:
05 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses
3. Methodology
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tu, T.C. New energy vehicles and environmental sustainability. J. Eco-Innov. 2019, vol. 7(no. 2), 120–128. [Google Scholar]
- Sarzynski, A.; Larrieu, J.; Shrimali, G. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy transition. Energy Policy 2012, vol. 45(no. 1), 583–593. [Google Scholar]
- Sierzchula, W. Factors affecting EV adoption. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2014, vol. 83(no. 1), 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmadi, L. Electric vehicles and sustainable transportation. J. Clean. Mobil. 2022, vol. 12(no. 3), 45–58. [Google Scholar]
- Han, L.; Liao, X.; Yu, Y. Electric vehicle adoption: Performance and comfort factors. Transp. Res. Part A 2017, vol. 105(no. 1), 143–158. [Google Scholar]
- Sierzchula, W.; Bakker, S.; Maat, K.; van Wee, B. The influence of financial incentives on EV sales. Energy Policy 2016, vol. 94(no. 1), 103. [Google Scholar]
- Lieven, T.; Mühlmeier, S.; Henkel, S.; Waller, J.F. Who will buy electric cars? J. Consum. Mark. 2011, vol. 28(no. 5), 220–228. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, T.; Gensler, S.; Garcia, R. Knowledge and EV adoption. J. Bus. Res. 2013, vol. 66(no. 11), 2041–2048. [Google Scholar]
- Murray, J. Understanding Consumer Value; Routledge: London, U.K., 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Sheth, J.N.; Newman, B.I.; Gross, B.L. Consumption Values and Market Choice; South-Western Publishing: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Rezvani, Z.; Jansson, J.; Bengtsson, M. Consumer motives for EV adoption. Transp. Res. Part D. 2015, vol. 41, 89–113. [Google Scholar]
- Hagman, J.; Langbroek, J.H. Conditions for electric vehicle taxi: A case study in the Greater Stockholm region. J. Sustain. Transp. 2019, vol. 13(no. 6), 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuitema, G.; Anable, J.; Skippon, S.; Kinnear, S. Consumer performance perceptions of EVs. Transp. Res. Part A 2013, vol. 48(no. 1), 39–49. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, W.T.; Chen, C.F. Behavioral intentions in green transport. Transp. Res. Part F. 2011, vol. 14(no. 5), 326–334. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhang, X. Perceived value and public transport adoption. Transp. Res. Part A 2018, vol. 113, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Aravindan, A. Consumption value theory and purchase intention for green. Int. J. Sustain. Mark. 2023, vol. 8(no. 1), 13–29. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.; Huang, Y. Consumer value and green product purchase intention. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2012, vol. 42(no. 3), 593–622. [Google Scholar]
- Gonçalves, H.; Lourenço, T.F.; da Silva, A. Green purchasing behavior and non-functional values. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, vol. 129, 144–154. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, E.W.; Fornell, C.; Mazvancheryl, S.K. Customer satisfaction and shareholder value. J. Mark. 2005, vol. 68(no. 4), 172–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prahalad, C.K.; Hamel, G. Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm? Strateg. Manag. J. 1994, vol. 15(no. S2), 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flint, D.J.; Woodruff, R.B.; Gardial, S.F. Exploring customer value changes. J. Bus. Res. 2002, vol. 55(no. 5), 319–330. [Google Scholar]
- Babin, B.J.; Darden, W.R.; Griffin, M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consum. Res. 1994, vol. 20(no. 4), 644–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patterson, P.G.; Spreng, R.A. Modelling customer value. J. Bus. Res. 1997, vol. 7(no. 3), 233–247. [Google Scholar]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 1988, vol. 52(no. 3), 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monroe, K.B. Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Koller, M.; Floh, A.; Zauner, A. Multi-dimensional customer value. J. Bus. Res. 2011, vol. 64(no. 2), 175–181. [Google Scholar]
- Holbrook, M.B. Consumption experience and value. Mark. Sci. 2006, vol. 59(no. 6), 714–725. [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez, J.; Callarisa, L.; Rodriguez, R.; Moliner, M.A. Perceived value differences in services. Serv. Ind. J. 2006, vol. 26(no. 3), 307–321. [Google Scholar]
- Park, H.; Rabolt, N. Theory of Consumption Values across cultures. J. Cross-Cult. Consum. Stud. 2009, vol. 4(no. 2), 45–60. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, P.; Soutar, G.N. Value theory in buyer behavior. J. Consum. Behav. 2009, vol. 8(no. 3), 145–153. [Google Scholar]
- Bodker, M.; Gimpel, G.; Hedman, J. Value in the digital service economy. Electron. Mark. 2009, vol. 19(no. 2–3), 127–138. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Li, J.; Zhao, D. Multidimensional value and green transport. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, vol. 41, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burcu, T.; Seda, S.G. Symbolic and social value in consumer decision making. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2013, vol. 37(no. 6), 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Aqueveque, C. Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: The influence of consumption situation. J. Consum. Mark. 2006, vol. 23(no. 5), 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noppers, E.H.; Keizer, K.; Bolderdijk, J.W.; Steg, L. Status and sustainable technology adoption. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014, vol. 38, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Whitmarsh, L.; O’Neill, S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, vol. 30(no. 3), 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackay, H. The Consumer’s Mind; HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Faiers, A.; Cook, M.; Neame, C. The influence of emotional and rational factors on consumer choice. Energy Policy 2007, vol. 35(no. 1), 39–49. [Google Scholar]
- Yeo, V.C.S.; Mohamed, R.; Yeo, M. Curiosity and consumer information search. J. Consum. Mark. 2016, vol. 33(no. 2), 98–108. [Google Scholar]
- Tanner, C.; Kast, S.W. Promoting sustainable mobility. Transp. Res. Part A 2003, vol. 37(no. 10), 857–870. [Google Scholar]
- Hessami, Z.; Yousefi, S. Product expertise and adoption of innovations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2013, vol. 80(no. 6), 1042–1054. [Google Scholar]
- Turrentine, T.; Kurani, K. Car buyers and advanced technologies. Transp. Res. Part C 2007, vol. 15(no. 3), 184–195. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, Y.H.; Chen, M.F.; Liu, S.C. Conditional value and consumer decisions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2010, vol. 17(no. 1), 10–18. [Google Scholar]
- Biswas, A.; Roy, M. Green products: Changing consumer behavior. J. Bus. Strategy 2015, vol. 36(no. 1), 39–46. [Google Scholar]
- Lorenzoni, I.; Nicholson-Cole, S.; Whitmarsh, L. Barriers to pro-environmental behavior. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2007, vol. 17(no. 3–4), 445–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saxena, R.; Khandelwal, P. Situational factors in green product purchase. J. Consum. Mark. 2010, vol. 27(no. 5), 112–120. [Google Scholar]
- Winter, M.; Kunze, J.; Balducci, F. Economics of electric vehicles. Energy Transp. Econ. 2010, vol. 12(no. 2), 80–93. [Google Scholar]
- Hidrue, M.K.; Parsons, G.R.; Kempton, W.; Gardner, M.P. Willingness to pay for electric vehicles. Energy Econ. 2011, vol. 33(no. 3), 686–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barth, M.; Jugert, P.; Fritsche, I. The role of infrastructure in electric vehicle adoption. Transp. Res. Part F. 2016, vol. 43, 177–189. [Google Scholar]
- Halbey, M.; Schmidt, M.; Peters, A. Charging infrastructure and consumer acceptance. Transp. Environ. J. 2015, vol. 9(no. 3), 115–124. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M.; Danks, N. PLS-SEM Using SmartPLS 4; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Noor, M. The Electric Vehicle (EV) Revolution: How Consumption Values, Consumer Attitudes, and Infrastructure Readiness Influence the Intention to Purchase Electric Vehicles in Malaysia. World Electr. Veh. J. 2025, vol. 16(no. 10), 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hur, W.M.; Kim, H.; Kim, H. Social identity and green consumption. Sustain. Manag. Rev. 2013, vol. 15(no. 2), 103–120. [Google Scholar]
- Sweeney, J.C.; Soutar, G. Consumer perceived value: A multi-item scale. J. Retail. 2001, vol. 77(no. 2), 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moons, I.; De Pelsmacker, D.P. EV adoption and emotional evaluations. Transp. Res. Part A 2012, vol. 48, 122–135. [Google Scholar]
- Alesia, A.; Kim, J.; Park, S. Novelty value and consumer attitudes toward electric vehicles. J. Transp. Res. 2014, vol. 22(no. 1), 33–45. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, K.C.H.; Zailani, S.; Shaharudin, M.R. Energy saving behaviour and willingness to purchase EV among Malaysian: The consumption values perspective. Energy Nexus 2025, vol. 100(no. 5), 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Guo, F.; Li, X. Conditional value and energy-efficient vehicles. Energy Policy 2021, vol. 156, 112–123. [Google Scholar]
- Alganad, A.M.; Chik, R.; Fatkin, J. Conditional value and consumer attitudes toward energy-efficient vehicles. Sustain. Consum. J. 2021, vol. 14(no. 2), 77–89. [Google Scholar]
- Patt, A.; Aeschbach, J.; van Vliet, O. Charging infrastructure and EV adoption potential. Energy Policy 2019, vol. 133, 110–118. [Google Scholar]

| Characteristic | Percentage | |
| Gender | - Female | 42 |
| - Male | 58 | |
| Age | -Below 20 | 2 |
| -21-30 | 48 | |
| -31-40 | 36 | |
| -Above 40 | 14 | |
| Education | - Master degree | 11 |
| - Bachelor degree | 71 | |
| - High School/Students | 18 | |
| Occupation | - Employee | 48 |
| - Professional/ business owner | 21 | |
| - Housewife | 15 | |
| - Students | 10 | |
| - Other | 6 |
| Variables | Cronbach’s alpha | AVE |
| Functional Value X1 | 0.805 | 0.462 |
| Social Value X2 | 0.883 | 0.740 |
| Emotional Value X3 | 0.780 | 0.477 |
| Novelty Value X4 | 0.631 | 0.576 |
| Conditional Value X5 | 0.698 | 0.525 |
| Consumer Attitude Y | 0.813 | 0.519 |
| Infrastructure Readiness Z | 0.806 | 0.631 |
| Saturated model | Estimated model | |
| SRMR | 0.072 | 0.071 |
| Hypothesis | Path | Path Co- efficient |
T- values |
P- values |
Result |
| H1 | Functional Value -> Consumer Choice Behavior | 0.253 | 4.664 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H2 | Social Value -> Consumer Choice Behavior | 0.188 | 3.672 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H3 | Emotional Value-> Consumer Choice Behavior |
0.222 | 3.892 | 0.000 | Supported |
| H4 | Epistemic Value -> Consumer Choice Behavior | 0.051 | 1.070 | 0.285 | Not Supported |
| H5 | Conditional Value -> Consumer Choice Behavior |
0.159 | 2.963 | 0.003 | Supported |
| H6 | Infrastructure Readiness x Functional Value-> Consumer Choice Behavior |
-0.083 | 2.585 | 0.013 | Supported |
| H7 | Infrastructure Readiness x Social Value - > Consumer Choice Behavior |
-0.043 | 2.254 | 0.021 | Supported |
| H8 | Infrastructure Readiness x Emotional Value -> Consumer Choice Behavior |
-0.032 | 2.518 | 0.012 | Supported |
| H9 | Infrastructure Readiness x Novelty Value -> Consumer Choice Behavior |
0.137 | 0.607 | 0.544 | Not Supported |
| H10 | Infrastructure Readiness x Conditional Value -> Consumer Choice Behavior |
-0.017 | 2.349 | 0.072 | Supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).