Submitted:
02 June 2026
Posted:
03 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer, yet treatment response is biologically heterogeneous, underscoring the need for predictive biomarkers. This study aimed to characterize how baseline and on-treatment gut microbiome ecology relate to clinically relevant response dimensions, and to identify baseline-level markers that could be integrated into a pre-treatment response score. Methods: Shotgun metagenomic profiling of the stool microbiome was performed in a real-world cohort of 13 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with TNT followed by total mesorectal excision, together with 18 non-RC controls. Treatment response was assessed in a pathology-anchored framework integrating both tumour regression and nodal response, with favourable response defined by Modified Ryan TRG1–2 and two-category nodal downstaging. Results: Longitudinal analysis from the therapy-naive baseline through TNT to the end of treatment showed that tumour topography was associated with distinct baseline microbiome states and divergent treatment-associated remodelling trajectories. In our cohort, age also stratified microbiome behaviour, with patients aged ≥70 years showing higher baseline pathogen-associated and antimicrobial resistance-linked burden together with a more contraction-prone ecological trajectory. Partitioning the microbiome into below-mean and above-mean fractions showed that biomass was concentrated in dominant taxa, whereas much of the diversity resided in the low-abundance background. Favourable TNT response was associated more with preservation of this low-abundance complexity than with higher overall diversity alone. TNT remodelled, but did not eliminate, a microbiome layer enriched in genotoxicity- and virulence-associated signals, which remained structured by age, tumour location, and response category. Among baseline taxa, Phocaeicola coprophilus emerged as the only species-level signal consistently associated with favourable outcome across both pathological and nodal response dimensions, discriminating patients with concordantly favourable outcomes from all others. To integrate the most informative pre-treatment microbiome features, an exploratory Microbiome Baseline Score was generated, showing promising preliminary performance in this pilot cohort, with a sensitivity of 0.875 and a specificity of 1.00, warranting validation in larger independent cohorts. Conclusions: Our results support the concept that clinically relevant response-associated information may already be embedded in the therapy-naive gut microbiome and can be condensed into a proof-of-concept baseline score for future microbiome-informed pre-treatment stratification in LARC.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Study Design
Treatment Protocol
Assessment of Treatment Response
Sample Collection and Nucleic Acid Extraction
Shotgun Sequencing and Metadata Processing
Statistical Analysis and Visualization
3. Results
3.1. Cohort Characteristics and Pathology-Based Response Stratification
3.2. Tumour Location Was Associated with Distinct Longitudinal Microbiome Trajectories During the Chemoradiotherapy of TNT
3.3. Age-Associated Differences in Diversity, Potential Pathogen Load, and AMR Burden During TNT
3.4. Response-Stratified Longitudinal Changes in Low- vs. High-Abundance-Partitioned Microbiome Diversity During TNT
3.5. Potential Genotoxic Burden and Virulence-Associated Gene Profiles in LARC During TNT
3.6. Exclusivity-Based Identification of Outcome-Associated Species Across TNT
3.7. Integration of Baseline Microbiome Biomarkers into a Response Score
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Steike, D.R.; Pepper, N.B.; Gravemeyer, S.; Bremer, A.; Glasbrenner, B.; Brüwer, M.; Pascher, A.; Domagk, D.; Biermann, L.; Lenz, P.; et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: barriers to implementation in real-world practice. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2026, 152, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boublikova, L.; Novakova, A.; Simsa, J.; Lohynska, R. Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: the evidence and expectations. Crit. Rev. Oncol. 2023, 192, 104196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunsell, T.H.; Cengija, V.; Sveen, A.; Bjørnbeth, B.A.; Røsok, B.I.; Brudvik, K.W.; Guren, M.G.; Lothe, R.A.; Abildgaard, A.; Nesbakken, A. Heterogeneous radiological response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with poor prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. (EJSO) 2019, 45, 2340–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, G.G.; Park, J.; Helewa, R.M.; Goldenberg, B.A.; Nashed, M.; Hyun, E. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a guide for surgeons. Can. J. Surg. 2023, 66, E196–E201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavery, A.; Turkington, R.C. Transcriptomic biomarkers for predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in oesophageal cancer. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2020, 8, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yacoub, H.; Zenzri, Y.; Cherif, D.; Ben Mansour, H.; Attia, N.; Mokrani, C.; Ben Zid, K.; Letaief, F.; Maamouri, N.; Mezlini, A. Predictors of pathological complete response after total neoadjuvant treatment using short course radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025, 25, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, T.; Ren, Z.; Jiang, H.; Ding, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, F. Gut microbiome signature in response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1543507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garvey, M. Intestinal Dysbiosis: Microbial Imbalance Impacts on Colorectal Cancer Initiation, Progression and Disease Mitigation. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badero, O.J.; Meribole, E.S.; Omokore, O.; O Quadri, I.; Kingdom, P.; Ifeanyichukwu, O.-C.C.; O Ogunnoiki, S.; Samuel-Ogunnoiki, P.M.; Adeyoola, O.; Osibowale, B.; et al. Gut Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer: Is Microbial Dysbiosis in Carcinogenesis an Emerging Risk Factor? Cureus 2026, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, Y.; Zeng, B.; Wang, Z.; Liang, S.; Yang, Y. Faecalcrobiota metabolites: emerging insights into cancer radiotherapy outcomes. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1663835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Li, F.; Gao, Y.; Kang, S.; Li, J.; Guo, J. Microbiome in radiotherapy: an emerging approach to enhance treatment efficacy and reduce tissue injury. Mol. Med. 2024, 30, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, Y.-E.; Chang, T.-H.; Chou, T.-W.; Lin, J.-C.; Hung, L.-C.; Huang, C.-C.; Lin, J.-B.; Lee, J. Predictive factors of pathologic good response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Discov. Oncol. 2025, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assaf, D.; Lawrence, Y.; Margalit, O.; Shacham-Shmueli, E.; Bear, L.; Elbaz, N.; Lebedayev, A.; Ram, E.; Anderson, Y.; Gruper, O.; et al. Predictors and Long-Term Outcomes of Pathological Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Treatment and Radical Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Fu, X.; Wen, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, D. Predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A combined deep learning and machine learning approach utilizing longitudinal multi-sequence MRI. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 2026, 16, 100739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Álvarez-Aguilera, M.; Moreno, A.C.; Cózar, M.Á.B.; Menéndez, N.V.; de la Osa, J.M.O.; Miranda, J.L.D.; Quirós, I.A.; Gutiérrez, G.M.; Martín, J.J.B.; Ramírez, C.C.; et al. Influence of topography on the mucosa-associated gut microbiota in colon cancer. 2026, 104, 800298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keikes, L.; Kos, M.; Verbeek, X.A.A.M.; Van Vegchel, T.; Nagtegaal, I.D.; Lahaye, M.J.; Romero, A.M.; De Bruijn, S.; Verheul, H.M.W.; Rütten, H.; et al. Conversion of a colorectal cancer guideline into clinical decision trees with assessment of validity. Int. J. Qual. Heal. Care 2021, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallicelli, C.; Barbara, S.J.; Fabbri, E.; Perrina, D.; Griggio, G.; Agnoletti, V.; Catena, F. Geriatric Approaches to Rectal Cancer: Moving Towards a Patient-Tailored Treatment Era. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jousset, A.; Bienhold, C.; Chatzinotas, A.; Gallien, L.; Gobet, A.; Kurm, V.; Küsel, K.; Rillig, M.C.; Rivett, D.W.; Salles, J.F.; et al. Where less may be more: How the rare biosphere pulls ecosystems strings. ISME J. 2017, 11, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrilla, A.; Nemeth, P.; Fauszt, P.; Szilagyi-Racz, A.; Mikolas, M.; Szilagyi-Tolnai, E.; David, P.; Stagel, A.; Gal, F.; Gal, K.; et al. Comparative analysis of the postadmission and antemortem oropharyngeal and rectal swab microbiota of ICU patients. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikolas, M.; Fauszt, P.; Petrilla, A.; Nemeth, P.; David, P.; Szilagyi-Tolnai, E.; Szilagyi-Racz, A.; Stagel, A.; Gal, F.; Gal, K.; et al. Analysis of ICU resistome dynamics in patients, staff and environment for the identification of predictive biomarkers of sepsis and early mortality. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamames, J.; Puente-Sánchez, F. SqueezeMeta, A Highly Portable, Fully Automatic Metagenomic Analysis Pipeline. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchfink, B.; Xie, C.; Huson, D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 59–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayers, E. W.; et al. GenBank 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D141–D144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- biobakery/kneaddata. bioBakery. 2026.
- Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alcock, B.P.; Huynh, W.; Chalil, R.; Smith, K.W.; Raphenya, A.R.; A Wlodarski, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Petkau, A.; A Syed, S.; Tsang, K.K.; et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 51, D690–D699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wickham, H.; Chang, W.; Henry, L.; Pedersen, T.L.; Takahashi, K.; Wilke, C.; Woo, K.; Yutani, H.; Dunnington, D.; Brand, T.
- Sievert, C.; Parmer, C.; Hocking, T.; Chamberlain, S.; Ram, K.; Corvellec, M.; Despouy.
- Oksanen, J.; Simpson, G.L.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. 2025). Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/ https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 18 September 2025).
- Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robin, X.; Turck, N.; Hainard, A.; Tiberti, N.; Lisacek, F.; Sanchez, J.-C.; Müller, M. pROC: An open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domilescu, I.; Miutescu, B.; Horhat, F.G.; Popescu, A.; Nica, C.; Ghiuchici, A.M.; Gadour, E.; Sîrbu, I.; Hutanu, D. Gut-Microbiome Signatures Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Metabolites 2025, 15, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Lau, H.C.-H.; Liu, C.; Ding, X.; Sun, Y.; Rong, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Yuan, K.; Miao, Y.; et al. Multi-cohort analysis reveals colorectal cancer tumor location-associated fecal microbiota and their clinical impact. Cell Host Microbe 2025, 33, 589–601.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyake, T.; Mori, H.; Yasukawa, D.; Hexun, Z.; Maehira, H.; Ueki, T.; Kojima, M.; Kaida, S.; Iida, H.; Shimizu, T.; et al. The Comparison of Fecal Microbiota in Left-Side and Right-Side Human Colorectal Cancer. Eur. Surg. Res. 2021, 62, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, M.; Shang, F.; Wu, J.; Fan, Q.; Chen, C.; Fan, J.; Liu, L.; Nie, X.; Zhang, T.; Cai, K.; et al. Tumor-Associated Microbiota in Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer and Their Relationships With Clinical Outcomes. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, G.; Chen, R.; Zheng, P.; Long, K.; Cheng, K.K.Y.; Sulaiman, J.E.; Huang, X. Oral pathogens meet the gut microbiome: new mechanistic insights on systemic disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2026, 15, 1673512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, T.; Huang, X.; Liao, J.; Zhang, H.; Hu, L.; Xie, M. The bidirectional effects and mechanisms of the oral and gut microbiomes: a narrative review. Front. Immunol. 2026, 17, 1697413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flemer, B.; Warren, R.D.; Barrett, M.P.; Cisek, K.; Das, A.; Jeffery, I.B.; Hurley, E.; O‘Riordain, M.; Shanahan, F.; O’Toole, P.W. The oral microbiota in colorectal cancer is distinctive and predictive. Gut 2018, 67, 1454–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pandey, H.; Tang, D.W.T.; Wong, S.H.; Lal, D. Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer: Biological Role and Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers 2023, 15, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klier, K.M.; Anantharaman, K. An updated view of metabolic handoffs in microbiomes. Trends Microbiol. 2025, 34, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Facchin, S.; Calgaro, M.; Savarino, E.V. Rethinking Short-Chain Fatty Acids: A Closer Look at Propionate in Inflammation, Metabolism, and Mucosal Homeostasis. Cells 2025, 14, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, M.; Gao, K.; Peng, K.; Bi, S.; Cui, X.; Liu, Y. A Review of Nutritional Regulation of Intestinal Butyrate Synthesis: Interactions Between Dietary Polysaccharides and Proteins. Foods 2025, 14, 3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daprà, V.; Airoldi, M.; Bartolini, M.; Fazio, R.; Mondello, G.; Tronconi, M.C.; Prete, M.G.; D’agostino, G.; Foppa, C.; Spinelli, A.; et al. Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciernikova, S.; Sevcikova, A.; Mladosievicova, B.; Mego, M. Microbiome in Cancer Development and Treatment. Microorganisms 2023, 12, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadyan, S.; Park, G.; Singh, T.P.; Patoine, C.; Singar, S.; Heise, T.; Domeier, C.; Ray, C.; Kumar, M.; Behare, P.V.; et al. Microbiome-based therapeutics towards healthier aging and longevity. Genome Med. 2025, 17, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradley, E.; Haran, J. The human gut microbiome and aging. Gut Microbes 16, 2359677. [CrossRef]
- Burns, M.B.; Lynch, J.; Starr, T.K.; Knights, D.; Blekhman, R. Virulence genes are a signature of the microbiome in the colorectal tumor microenvironment. Genome Med. 2015, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tavella, T.; Turroni, S.; Brigidi, P.; Candela, M.; Rampelli, S. The Human Gut Resistome up to Extreme Longevity. mSphere 2021, 6, e0069121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, T.; Wang, J.; Feng, Q.; Xu, X.; Zhu, W.; Mao, S.; Liu, J. Age- and diet-driven assembly of the gut antibiotic resistome in humans and food-producing animals. Gut Microbes 2026, 18, 2610052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, B.; Ma, J.; Xu, W.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Lv, C.; Su, W.; Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhang, B.; et al. Gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: mechanistic insights, diagnostic advances, and microbiome-based therapeutic strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1699893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carvalho, J.V.M.; Meyer, J.; Ris, F.; Durham, A.; Bornand, A.; Ricoeur, A.; Corrò, C.; Koessler, T. Narrative Review: Predictive Biomarkers of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy or Total Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients. Cancers 2025, 17, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, M.; Liu, J.; Xia, Q. Role of gut microbiome in cancer immunotherapy: from predictive biomarker to therapeutic target. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2023, 12, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Lyu, C.; Sun, B.; Zhang, R.; Li, H.; Chen, J. Gut microbiota and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and emerging insights. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2026, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepanyan, A.; Kotsafti, A.; Rosato, A.; Castagliuolo, I.; Scarpa, M.; Scarpa, M.; Agostini, M.; Angriman, I.; Antoniutti, M.; Bao, Q.R.; et al. Gut microbiota-associated predictors as biomarkers of neoadjuvant treatment response in rectal cancer-a systematic review. Br. J. Cancer 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Luo, C.; Li, H.; Ma, S.; Wang, P.; Liu, H.; Sun, L.; Yin, Y.; et al. Phocaeicola coprophilus -Derived 6-Methyluracil Attenuates Radiation-Induced Intestinal Fibrosis by Suppressing the IDO1-Kynurenine-AHR Axis. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e18502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ota, G.; Inoue, R.; Saito, A.; Kono, Y.; Kitayama, J.; Sata, N.; Horie, H. Reduced Abundance of Phocaeicola in Mucosa-associated Microbiota Is Associated with Distal Colorectal Cancer Metastases Possibly through an Altered Local Immune Environment. J. Anus Rectum Colon 2024, 8, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Y. Statistical normalization methods in microbiome data with application to microbiome cancer research. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2244139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).