Submitted:
25 May 2026
Posted:
26 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Physicochemical and Colloidal Properties
2.2. Rheological Behavior of Reconstituted Nopal Mucilage
2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) of Nopal Mucilage
2.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) of Nopal Mucilages
2.5. Microstructural Analysis of Mucilage Powders
2.6. Removal of HM Using Reconstituted Nopal Mucilages
2.7. FTIR Analysis of the Evaporated Barren Solution
2.8. FTIR Analysis of the Flocs
3. Conclusions
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Mucilage Extraction and Pretreatment
4.2. Physicochemical Characterization
4.2.1. Proximate Composition
4.2.2. Water Activity
4.2.3. Hydrodynamic Diameter and Zeta Potential
4.3. Rheological Measurements
4.3.1. Dynamic Oscillatory Measurement
4.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
4.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
4.6. Microstructure and Image Analysis
4.6.1. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
4.6.2. Image Digital Analysis
- Angular second moment (ASM), a measure of textural uniformity (Equation 2):
- Contrast, which quantifies local variations in gray level values (Equation 3):
- Inverse difference moment (IDM), representing local homogeneity (Equation 4):
- Entropy, which measures the disorder or randomness of the image (Equation 5):
4.7. Heavy Metal Removal Assay
4.7.1. FTIR Analysis of Flocs
4.8. Statistical Analysis
Author Contributions
Funding
Abbreviations
| CA | Non-homogenized control mucilage |
| CB | Mucilage homogenized for 30 s |
| CC | Mucilage homogenized for 60 s |
| ζ | Zeta potential |
| HM | Heavy metals |
| BS | Barren solution |
| aw | Water activity |
| PDI | Polydispersity index |
| G″ | Loss modulus |
| G′ | Storage modulus |
| tan δ | Loss tangent |
| η* | Complex viscosity |
| G* | Complex modulus |
| ATR-FTIR | Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy |
| TGA | Thermogravimetric analysis |
| DTG | Derivative thermogravimetry |
| Tmax | Temperature of maximum degradation rate |
| DTGmax | Maximum mass loss rate |
| T5% | Temperature at 5% mass loss |
| T10% | Temperature at 10% mass loss |
| SEM | Scanning electron microscopy |
| GLCM | Gray level co-occurrence matrix |
| FD | Fractal dimension |
| ASM | Angular second moment |
| IDM | Inverse difference moment |
| SD | Standard deviation |
| LOD | Limit of detection |
| LOQ | Limit of quantification |
| FA | Flocs obtained using CA mucilage |
| FB | Flocs obtained using CB mucilage |
| FC | Flocs obtained using CC mucilage |
| AACC | American Association of Cereal Chemists |
| DLS | Dynamic light scattering |
| LVR | Linear viscoelastic region |
| SDBC | Shifting differential box counting |
| FD | fractal dimension |
References
- Madera-Santana, T.J.; Vargas-Rodríguez, L.; Núñez-Colín, C.A.; González-García, G.; Peña-Caballero, V.; Núñez-Gastélum, J.A.; Gallegos-Vázquez, C.; Rodríguez-Núñez, J.R. Mucilage from Cladodes of Opuntia Spinulifera Salm-Dyck: Chemical, Morphological, Structural and Thermal Characterization. CYTA-J. Food 2018, 16, 650–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- León-Martínez, F.M.; Cano-Barrita, P.F. de J. Cactus Mucilage: A Review of Its Rheological and Physicochemical Properties and Use as Bio-Admixture in Building Materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- del Mar García Martín, C.; Ramírez, O.; Bonardd, S.; López-Darias, M.; Franco, L.; M’Rabet, Y.; Khwaldia, K.; Díaz Díaz, D. Unlocking the Potential of Opuntia Species Mucilage in Chemistry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 268, 131647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-González, F.; Pérez-González, J.; Muñoz-López, C.N.; Vargas-Solano, S.V.; Marín-Santibáñez, B.M. Influence of Age on Molecular Characteristics and Rheological Behavior of Nopal Mucilage. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 6776–6785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torregrossa, F.; Pollon, M.; Liguori, G.; Gargano, F.; Albanese, D.; Malvano, F.; Cinquanta, L. Rheological and Physical Properties of Mucilage Hydrogels from Cladodes of Opuntia Ficus-Indica: Comparative Study with Pectin. Gels 2025, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukaila, Y.O.; Adeyemi, J.O.; Fawole, O.A. Towards Sustainable Biopolymer Innovation: A Review of Opuntia Ficus-Indica Mucilage. Processes 2025, Vol. 13, 2025, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contreras-Padilla, M.; Rodríguez-García, M.E.; Gutiérrez-Cortez, E.; Valderrama-Bravo, M. del C.; Rojas-Molina, J.I.; Rivera-Muñoz, E.M. Physicochemical and Rheological Characterization of Opuntia Ficus Mucilage at Three Different Maturity Stages of Cladode. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 78, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quintero-García, M.; Gutiérrez-Cortez, E.; Bah, M.; Rojas-Molina, A.; Cornejo-Villegas, M. de los A.; Del Real, A.; Rojas-Molina, I. Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Physicochemical Properties of the Mucilage Extracted from Fresh and Dehydrated Opuntia Ficus Indica Cladodes. Foods 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scognamiglio, F.S.; Gattia, D.M.; Roselli, G.; Persia, F.; De Angelis, U.; Santulli, C. Thermoplastic Starch (TPS) Films Added with Mucilage from Opuntia Ficus Indica: Mechanical, Microstructural and Thermal Characterization. Materials 2020, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Cruz, A.; Rojas Valencia, M.N.; Araiza-Aguilar, J.A.; Nájera-Aguilar, H.A.; Gutiérrez-Hernández, R.F. Leachate Treatment: Comparison of a Bio-Coagulant (Opuntia Ficus Mucilage) and Conventional Coagulants Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Heliyon 2021, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adjeroud, N.; Elabbas, S.; Merzouk, B.; Hammoui, Y.; Felkai-Haddache, L.; Remini, H.; Leclerc, J.P.; Madani, K. Effect of Opuntia Ficus Indica Mucilage on Copper Removal from Water by Electrocoagulation-Electroflotation Technique. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 811, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera-Corona, J.L.; Rodríguez-González, F.; Rendón-Villalobos, R.; García-Hernández, E.; Solorza-Feria, J. Thermal, Structural and Rheological Properties of Sorghum Starch with Cactus Mucilage Addition. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 806–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-González, S.; Martínez-Flores, H.E.; Chávez-Moreno, C.K.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.I.; Zavala-Mendoza, E.; Garnica-Romo, M.G.; Chacón-García, L. EXTRACTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MUCILAGE FROM WILD SPECIES OF OPUNTIA. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernardino-Nicanor, A.; Montañez-Soto, J.L.; Conde-Barajas, E.; Negrete-Rodríguez, M. de la L.X.; Teniente-Martínez, G.; Vargas-León, E.A.; Juárez-Goiz, J.M.S.; Acosta-García, G.; González-Cruz, L. Spectroscopic and Structural Analyses of Opuntia Robusta Mucilage and Its Potential as an Edible Coating. Coatings 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fedala, N.; Lounici, H.; Drouiche, N.; Mameri, N.; Drouiche, M. Physical Parameters Affecting Coagulation of Turbid Water with Opuntia Ficus-Indica Cactus. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 77, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lugo-Arias, J.; Lugo-Arias, E.; Ovallos-Gazabon, D.; Arango, J.; de la Puente, M.; Silva, J. Effectiveness of the Mixture of Nopal and Cassava Starch as Clarifying Substances in Water Purification: A Case Study in Colombia. Heliyon 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera Cañón, A.F.; Hernández Carrillo, C.G.; Gómez Cuaspud, J.A. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of Nopal (Opuntia Ficus-Indica) as Bio Coagulant-Flocculant for Water Treatment. In Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing Ltd, 18 October 2021; Vol. 2046. [Google Scholar]
- Harrington, R.E. Degradation of Polymers in High Speed Rotary Homogenizers: A Hydrodynamic Interpretation. J. I’OLYMlSR Sci. PART A-1 1966, 4, 489–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, L.J.; Xue, J. Effects of High Pressure Homogenization on Rheological Properties of Flaxseed Gum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 83, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fox, D.I.; Pichler, T.; Yeh, D.H.; Alcantar, N.A. Removing Heavy Metals in Water: The Interaction of Cactus Mucilage and Arsenate (As (V)). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4553–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas-Solano, S.V.; Rodríguez-González, F.; Martínez-Velarde, R.; Morales-García, S.S.; Jonathan, M.P. Removal of Heavy Metals Present in Water from the Yautepec River Morelos México, Using Opuntia Ficus-Indica Mucilage. Environ. Adv. 2022, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Secretaría de Economía Minería. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/se/acciones-y-programas/mineria (accessed on 13 May 2026).
- Mekuto, L.; Ntwampe, S.K.O.; Akcil, A. An Integrated Biological Approach for Treatment of Cyanidation Wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Fang, T. Adsorption of Zinc onto Anionic Ion-Exchange Resin from Cyanide Barren Solution. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 23, 646–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J.; Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metal Toxicity and the Environment. EXS 2012, 101, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barakat, M.A.; Barakat, M.A. New Trends in Removing Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater. Arab. J. Chem. 2011, 4, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crini, G.; Lichtfouse, E. Advantages and Disadvantages of Techniques Used for Wastewater Treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Avilez, E.; Rodríguez-González, F.; Vargas-Solano, S.V.; Osorio-Ruiz, A.; Jonathan, M.P.; Campos-Villegas, L.E. Effect of the Concentration of Uronic Acids in Opuntia Mucilage on the Removal of Heavy Metals and Water Quality of the Yautepec River, Mexico. Arab. J. Chem. 2024, 17, 105636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Carranza, P.; Rivadeneyra-Mata, M.; Ramos-Cassellis, M.E.; Aparicio-Fernández, X.; Navarro-Cruz, A.R.; Ávila-Sosa, R.; Ochoa-Velasco, C.E. Characterization of Red Prickly Pear Peel (Opuntia Ficus-Indica L.) and Its Mucilage Obtained by Traditional and Novel Methodologies. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 1111–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dick, M.; Dal Magro, L.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Rios, A. de O.; Flôres, S.H. Valorization of Opuntia Monacantha (Willd.) Haw. Cladodes to Obtain a Mucilage with Hydrocolloid Features: Physicochemical and Functional Performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 900–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saporittis, K.; Morales, R.; Martinez, M.J. High Pressure Homogenization: A Promising Approach to Expand Food Applications of Chia Mucilage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 263, 129787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picout, D.R.; Ross-Murphy, S.B. Rheology of Biopolymer Solutions and Gels. ScientificWorldJournal. 2003, 3, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinzio, C.; Ayunta, C.; Alancay, M.; de Mishima, B.L.; Iturriaga, L. Physicochemical and Rheological Properties of Mucilage Extracted from Opuntia Ficus Indica (L. Miller). Comparative Study with Guar Gum and Xanthan Gum. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2018, 12, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otálora, M.C.; Wilches-Torres, A.; Gómez Castaño, J.A. Extraction and Physicochemical Characterization of Dried Powder Mucilage from Opuntia Ficus-Indica Cladodes and Aloe Vera Leaves: A Comparative Study. Polymers . 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gheribi, R.; Habibi, Y.; Khwaldia, K. Prickly Pear Peels as a Valuable Resource of Added-Value Polysaccharide: Study of Structural, Functional and Film Forming Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avila-Reyes, S. V.; Márquez-Morales, C.E.; Moreno-León, G.R.; Jiménez-Aparicio, A.R.; Arenas-Ocampo, M.L.; Solorza-Feria, J.; García-Armenta, E.; Villalobos-Espinosa, J.C. Comparative Analysis of Fermentation Conditions on the Increase of Biomass and Morphology of Milk Kefir Grains. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno-León, G.R.; Avila-Reyes, S. V.; Villalobos-Espinosa, J.C.; Camacho-Díaz, B.H.; Tapia-Maruri, D.; Jiménez-Aparicio, A.R.; Arenas-Ocampo, M.L.; Solorza-Feria, J. Effect of Agave Fructans on Changes in Chemistry, Morphology and Composition in the Biomass Growth of Milk Kefir Grains. Microorg. 2023 2023, 11, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhuiyan, M.H.R.; Yeasmen, N.; Orsat, V. Food Surface Characterization by Scanning Electron Microscopy and Fractal Analysis: A Review. Food Chem. 2026, 498, 147148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smoczyn’ski, M.; Smoczyn’ski, S. Fractal Analysis of the Microstructure of Milk Powders Produced at Various Temperatures. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2303–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibarra-Rodríguez, D.; Lizardi-Mendoza, J.; López-Maldonado, E.A.; Oropeza-Guzmán, M.T. Capacity of ‘Nopal’ Pectin as a Dual Coagulant-Flocculant Agent for Heavy Metals Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 323, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satarug, S.; Garrett, S.H.; Sens, M.A.; Sens, D.A. Cadmium, Environmental Exposure, and Health Outcomes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parga, J.R.; Valenzuela, J.L.; Díaz, J.A. Cyanide and Copper Recovery from Barren Solution of the Merrill Crowe Process. In TMS Annual Meeting; Springer: Cham, 2013; pp. 287–294. ISBN 978-3-319-48763-2. [Google Scholar]
- Parga, J.R.; Munive, G.T.; Valenzuela, J.L.; Vazquez, V. V.; Zamarripa, G.G.; Parga, J.R.; Munive, G.T.; Valenzuela, J.L.; Vazquez, V. V.; Zamarripa, G.G. Copper Recovery from Barren Cyanide Solution by Using Electrocoagulation Iron Process. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 3, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Li, Y.; He, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, M.; Liu, G. Recycling of Residual Valuable Metals in Cyanide-Leached Gold Wastewater Using the N263-TBP System. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kim, R.; Han, K.N. Advances in Hydrometallurgical Gold Recovery through Cementation, Adsorption, Ion Exchange and Solvent Extraction. Minerals 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otálora, M.C.; Carriazo, G.; Iturriaga, L.; Nazareno, A.; Osorio, C. Microencapsulation of Betalains Obtained from Cactus Fruit (Opuntia Ficus-Indica) by Spray Drying Using Cactus Cladode Mucilage and Maltodextrin as Encapsulating Agents. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AACC. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemist, 10th ed.; AACC International: St. Paul, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Du Toit, A.; De Wit, M.; Fouché, H.J.; Taljaard, M.; Venter, S.L.; Hugo, A. Mucilage Powder from Cactus Pears as Functional Ingredient: Influence of Cultivar and Harvest Month on the Physicochemical and Technological Properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 2404–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Secretaría de Economía Análisis de Agua.-Medición de Metales Por Absorción Atómica En Aguas Naturales, Potables y Resuiduales Tratadas-Método de Prueba (Cancela a La NMX-AA-051-SCFI-2001) 2016.
- Wan, J.; Chakraborty, T.; Xu, C.; Ray, M.B. Treatment Train for Tailings Pond Water Using Opuntia Ficus-Indica as Coagulant. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 211, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Parameter | CA | CB | CC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture* (%) | 2.70 ± 0.03 a | 2.74 ± 0.08 a | 2.68 ± 0.17 a |
| Protein* (%) | 9.22 ± 0.20 b | 8.64 ± 0.20 b | 9.92 ± 0.40 a |
| Ash* (%) | 27.56 ± 0.37 a | 27.49 ± 0.32 a | 29.95 ± 0.55 b |
| Lipids* (%) | 3.93 ± 0.20 a | 4.10 ± 0.18 a | 4.15 ± 0.21 a |
| Carbohydrates* (%) | 56.59 ± 0.61 | 57.03 ± 0.43 | 53.30 ± 0.73 |
| Water activity (aw) | 0.135 ± 0.007 a | 0.110 ± 0.000 b | 0.115 ± 0.007 b |
| Zeta potential (mV) | -15.7 ± 0.3 a | -18.3 ± 0.4 b | -17.0 ± 0.5 c |
| Average particle diameter (µm) | 1.8 ± 0.2 a | 1.3 ± 0.1 b | 1.3 ± 0.1 b |
| Polydispersity index | 0.60 ±0.17 a | 0.63 ± 0.04 a | 0.60 ± 0.10 a |
| Sample | T5% (°C) | T10% (°C) | Tmax (°C) | DTGmax (%/°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 142.2 | 172.6 | 215.2 | -0.2587 |
| CB | 136.1 | 171.3 | 218.4 | -0.2455 |
| CC | 137.6 | 172.3 | 219.3 | -0.2425 |
| Sample | Contrast | Entropy | ASM (x10-4) | IDM | FD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 469.17±136.16a | 7.81±0.20a | 5.00±1.28a | 0.094±0.015a | 2.23±0.06a |
| CB | 375.56±97.56b | 7.45±0.23 b | 7.47±1.83b | 0.134±0.015b | 2.16±0.05b |
| CC | 353.08±95.01b | 7.42±0.25b | 7.77±2.32b | 0.135±0.017 b | 2.17±0.06b |
| Sample | CA | CB | CC | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose (mg/L) |
200 | 400 | 800 | 200 | 400 | 800 | 200 | 400 | 800 | |
| Pb | Removal (%) |
98.08±1.40 | 98.23±1.15 | 98.65±0.14 | 98.46±0.23 | 98.89±0.29 | 99.08±0.61 | 99.09±0.61 | 98.59±0.94 | 98.44±0.73 |
| Residual (mg/L) | 0.038±0.028 | 0.036±0.023 | 0.027±0.003† | 0.031± 0.005† | 0.022±0.006† | 0.018±0.012† | 0.018±0.012† | 0.028±0.019† | 0.031±0.015† | |
| Ni | Removal (%) |
99.23±0.92 | 99.21±0.91 | 99.25±0.79 | 98.97±0.87 | 99.10±1.16 | 99.20±0.92 | 99.22±0.84 | 98.99±0.69 | 99.12±0.80 |
| Residual (mg/L) | 0.038± 0.046 | 0.040±0.045 | 0.037±0.04† | 0.051±0.044 | 0.045± 0.058 | 0.040± 0.046 | 0.039±0.042 | 0.050±0.034 | 0.044±0.04 | |
| As | Removal (%) |
99.96±0.08 | 98.90±1.56 | 98.28±2.01 | 99.81±0.39 | 99.38±1.24 | 98.83±1.92 | 99.90±0.20 | 100.00 ±0.00 | 99.92±0.16 |
| Residual (mg/L) | 0.004±0.008‡ | 0.110±0.156† | 0.172±0.201† | 0.02±0.039‡ | 0.062±0.124‡ | 0.117±0.192† | 0.01±0.02‡ | < LOD‡ | 0.008±0.016‡ | |
| Cd | Removal (%) |
86.31±27.38 | 76.81±26.97 | 82.66±21.17 | 87.12±25.76 | 39.93±25.81 | 59.40±21.98 | 93.16±13.67 | 93.75±12.50 | 89.02±21.96 |
| Residual (mg/L) | 0.069±0.137 | 0.116± 0.135 | 0.087±0.106 | 0.064±0.129 | 0.300±0.129 | 0.203± 0.11 | 0.034±0.068† | 0.031±0.063† | 0.055±0.11† | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).