This article reviews the linear solvers available in OpenFOAM and assesses their impact on the convergence behaviour of the SIMPLE algorithm. The discretisation of transport equations in CFD results in large and sparse linear systems, for which the choice of linear solver strongly influences the computational time. Although the solver does not change the final discrete solution, the difference in speed and robustness between the solvers can be more than an order of magnitude. A brief overview is given of how the velocity and pressure fields are decoupled in OpenFOAM, followed by a detailed review of the main linear solver families, including direct methods, basic iterative methods, multigrid methods and Krylov subspace methods, with attention to their practical strengths and weaknesses. The performance of the most advanced solvers is evaluated on a full-scale non-reacting kiln case consisting of 2.3 million cells. The pressure-corrector equation is identified as the main bottleneck in the SIMPLE algorithm. The Conjugate Gradient (CG) solver with the Generalised Geometric–Algebraic MultiGrid (GAMG) preconditioner is found to be the fastest and most stable method, achieving speed-ups of up to a factor of 7 compared to the slower advanced methods. Using GAMG as preconditioner also improves the robustness of the Bi-CGStab method.