Submitted:
21 May 2026
Posted:
21 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area, Weather Stations and Sugarcane Fields
2.2. Long-Term Water Balance Modelling





3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Thermal Conditions
3.2. Moisture Conditions
3.3. Long-Term Water Balance Accounting
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| SAFER | Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving |
| INMET | Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (in portuguese) |
| IBGE | Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (in portuguese) |
References
- Chooyok, P.; Pumijumnog, N.; Ussawarujikulchai, A.T. The water footprint assessment of ethanol production from molasses in Kanchanaburi and Supanburi province of Thailand. Procedia APCBEE 2013, 5, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cristóbal, J.; Matos, C.T.; Aurambout, J.-P.; Manfredi, S.; Kavalov, B. Environmental sustainability assessment of bioeconomy value chains. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 89, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa, J.M.; Junior, I.M.F.; de Melo, M.L.A.; Marin, F.R. Remote Sensing–driven ensemble smoother assimilation of LAI for regional sugarcane yield estimation. Remote Sens. App. Soc. Environ. 2016, 41, 101952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rudorf, B.F.T.; de Aguiar, D.A.; da Silva, W.F.; Sugawara, L.M.; Adami, M.; Moreira, M. A. Studies on the rapid expansion of sugarcane for ethanol production in São Paulo State (Brazil) using Landsat Data. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1057–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waclawovsky, A.J.; Sato, P.M.; Lembke, C.G.; Moore, P.H.; Souza, G.M. Sugarcane for bioenergy production: an assessment of yield and regulation of sucrose content. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerri, C.C.; Galdos, M.V.; Maia, S.M.F.; Bernoux, M.; Feigl, B.J.; Powlson, D.; Cerri, C.E.P. Effect of sugarcane harvesting systems on soil carbon stocks in Brazil: an examination of existing data. Eur. J. Soil. Sci. 2011, 62, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jesus, K.R.E.; Torquato, S.A.; Machado, P.G.; Zorzo, C.R.B.; Cardoso, B.O.; Leal, M.R.L.V.; Picoli, M.C.A.; Ramos, R.C.; Dalmago, G.A.; Capitani, D.; H, D.; Duft, D.,G.; Suárez, J.F.G.; Pierozzi, Jr. I.; Trevelin, L.C.; Moreira, D.A. Sustainability assessment of sugarcane production systems: SustenAgro Decision Support System. Environ. Dev. 2019, 32, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loarie, S.; Lobell, D.; Asner, G.; Mu, Q.; Field, C. Direct impacts on local climate of sugarcane expansion in Brazil. Nat. Clim. Change 2011, 2, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, M. R.; Pasqualetto, A.; Vieira, J. de C.; de Castro, S.D. Os Impactos ambientais do setor sucroenergético e uso de indicadores de sustentabilidade. RDE-Rev. Desenvolv. Econ. 2022, 2, 315–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godoi Neto, A. H.; Silva, E.F. de F.; de Morais, J.E.F.; de Andrade, L.G.L.; Cutrim, W. de O.; de Lacerda, C. F. Water potential, biochemical indicators and yield of sugarcane irrigated with brackish water and leaching. Rev. Bras. De Eng. Agr. Amb. 2020, 24, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldemberg, J.; Mello, F.; Cerri, C.P.; Davies, C.; Cerri, C.C. Meeting the global demand for biofuels in 2021 through sustainable land use change policy. Energy Policy 2014, 69, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mello, C.O.; Esperancini, M.S.T. Análise econômica da eficiência da produção de cana-de-açúcar de fornecedores do Estado do Paraná. Rev. Energy Agr. 2012, 27, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarpare, F.V.; Hernandes, T.A.D.; Ruiz-Correa, S.T.; Kolln, O.T.; Gava, G.J.C.; Santos, L.N.S.; Victoria, R.L. Sugarcane water footprint under different management practices in Brazil: Tietê/Jacaré watershed assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 4576–4584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Anderson, R.G.; Wang, D. Satellite-based crop coefficient and regional water use estimates for Hawaiian sugarcane. Field Crops Res. 2015, 180, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beringer, T.; Lucht, W.; Schaphoff, S. Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints. GCB Bioenergy 2011, 3, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacca, S.; Moreira, J. R. Historical carbon budget of the Brazilian ethanol program. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 4863–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rampazo, N.A.M.; Picoli, M.C.A.; Teixeira, A.H. de C.; Cavaliero, C.K.N. Water Consumption Modeling by Coupling MODIS Images and Agrometeorological Data for Sugarcane Crops. Sugar Tech. 2020, 23, 524–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson-Teixeira, K.J.; Snyder, P.K.; Twine., T.E.; Cuadra, S.V.; Costa, M.H.; DeLucia, E.H. Climate-regulation services of natural and agricultural ecoregions of the Americas. Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 2, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunkel, G.; Kosmol, J.; Sobral, M.; Rohn, H.; Montenegro, S.; Aureliano, J. Sugar cane industry as a source of water pollution-case study on the situation in Ipojuca River, Pernambuco, Brazil. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2007, 180, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, M. A.; Priess, J.A. Indicators of bioenergy-related certification schemes – an analysis of the quality and comprehensiveness for assessing local/regional environmental impacts. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 65, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, B.; Moraes, E.; Benavides, M.C.; Mataveli, G. Improved Albedo estimates implemented in the METRIC model for modeling energy balance fluxes and evapotranspiration over agricultural and natural areas in the Brazilian Cerrado. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, A.H. de C.; Leivas, J.F.; Takemura, C.M.; Pacheco, E.P.; Garçon, E.A.M.; Sousa, I.F.; Almeida, A.Q.; Thenkabail, P. S.; Azevedo, A.F.M. S. Modeling and Monitoring Water Productivity by Using Geotechnologies. In Remote Sensing Handbook, 2nd ed; Thenkabail, P.S., Ed.; CRC Press- Taylor & Francis, 2024; Volume 5, pp. 383–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farias, de J..; Teixeira, A. H.de C.; de Sousa, I.F.; Leivas, J.F.; Takemura, C.M.; Garçon, E.A.M. Large-scale water balance modeling using remote sensing and weather data: Application in an agricultural growing region of the coastal northeast Brazil. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2023, 32, 101072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Procopio, S. de O.; Cruz, M.A.S.; de Almeida, M.R.M.; de Jesus Junior, L.A.; Nogueira Junior, L.R.; de Carvalho, H.W.L. SEALBA: Região de Alto Potencial Agrícola no Nordeste Brasileiro. In Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros; 2019; p. 62. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56; Fao, Rome, 1998; Volume 300, 9, p. D05109. [Google Scholar]
- Woldemarian, G.W.; Awoke, B.G.; Maretto, R.V. Satellite-based energy balance for estimating actual sugarcane evapotranspiration in the Ethiopian Rift Valley. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2025, 223, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Z.; AghaKouchak, A. Multivariate Standardized Drought Index: a parametric multi-index model. Adv. Water Resour. 2013, 57, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim., D.; Rhee, J. A drought index based on actual evapotranspiration from the Bouchet hypothesis. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2016, 43, 10277–10285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, A.H. de C.; Leivas, J.F.; Pacheco, E.P.; Garçon, E.A.M.; Takemura, C.M. Biophysical characterization and monitoring large-Scale water and vegetation anomalies by remote sensing in the agricultural growing areas of the Brazilian semi-arid region. In Advances in remote sensing for natural resource monitoring; Pandey, P.C., Sharma, L.K., Eds.; Wiley Online Library: New Jersey, 2021; pp. 94–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Su, X.; Singh, V.P.; Ayantobo, O. Appraising standardized moisture anomaly index (SZI) in drought projection across China under CMIP6 forcing scenarios. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2021, 37, 100898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, I.Z.; Ruhoff, A.; Laipelt, L.; Bispo, R.C.; Hernandez, F.B.T.; Neale, C.M.U.; Teixeira, A.H. de C.; Marin, F.R. Remote sensing-based evapotranspiration modeling using geeSEBAL for sugarcane irrigation management in Brazil. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 274, 107965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bispo, R.C.; Hernandez, F.B.T.; Gonçalves, I. Z.; Neale, C.M.U.; Teixeira, A.H. de C. Remote sensing-based evapotranspiration modeling for sugarcane in Brazil using a hybrid approach. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 271, 107763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, A.H. de C. Determining regional actual evapotranspiration of irrigated and natural vegetation in the São Francisco River basin (Brazil) using remote sensing and Penman-Monteith equation. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1287–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, A.H. de C.; Scherer-Warren, M.; Hernandez, F.B.T.; Andrade, R.G.; Leivas, J.F. Large-scale water productivity assessments with MODIS Images in a changing Semi-Arid environment: a Brazilian case study. Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 5783–5804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, T.G.F.; Moura, M.S,B.; de Zolnier, S.; Soares, J.M.; Vieira, V.J. de S.; Júnior, W.F.G. Demanda hídrica e eficiência do uso da água da cana-de-açúcar irrigada no semiárido brasileiro. Rev. Bras. De Eng. Agr. Amb. 2011, 15, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tejera, N.A.; Rodes, R.; Ortega, E.; Campos, R.; Lluch, C. Comparative analysis of physiological characteristics and yield components in sugarcane cultivars. Field Crops Res. 2007, 102, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omary, M.; Izuno, F.T. Evaluation of sugar-cane evapotranspiration from water table data in the everglades agricultural area. Agric. Water Manag. 1995, 27, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eksteen, A.; Singels, A.; Ngxaliwe, S. Water relations of two contrasting sugarcane genotypes. Field Crops Res. 2014, 168, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nassif, D.S.P.; Marin, F.R.; Costa, L.G. Evapotranspiration and transpiration coupling to the atmosphere of sugarcane in Southern Brazil: Scaling up from leaf to field. Sugar Tech. 2014, 16, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inman-Bamber, N.G.; McGlinchey, M.G. Crop coefficients and water-use estimate for sugarcane based on long-term Bowen ratio energy balance measurements. Field Crops Res. 2003, 83, 125–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, N.; Chen, S.; Wilske, B.; Sun, G.; Chen, J. Evapotranspiration and soil water relationships in a range of disturbed and undisturbed ecosystems in the semi-arid Inner Mongolia, China. J. Plant Ecol. 2011, 4, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inman-Bamber, N.G.; Smith, D.M. Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Res. 2005, 92, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Year |
ASC (ha) |
P (m3 106) |
ET (m3 106) |
ET0 (m3 106) |
WBd (m3 106) |
WBr (-) |
Ef (-) |
| 2007 | 463,125 | 3,660 | 5,869 | 7,336 | -2,208 | 0.62 | 0.80 |
| 2008 | 462,925 | 6,451 | 4,645 | 7,099 | 1,806 | 1.39 | 0.65 |
| 2009 | 460,650 | 8,555 | 4,208 | 7,045 | 4,347 | 2.03 | 0.60 |
| 2010 | 461,463 | 7,502 | 4,853 | 6,906 | 2,648 | 1.55 | 0.70 |
| 2011 | 464,225 | 7,782 | 4,540 | 6,829 | 3,242 | 1.71 | 0.66 |
| 2012 | 464,075 | 4,623 | 4,717 | 7,151 | -94 | 0.98 | 0.66 |
| 2013 | 451,406 | 6,236 | 4,135 | 6,887 | 2,101 | 1.51 | 0.60 |
| 2014 | 447,713 | 6,524 | 4,591 | 6,586 | 1,933 | 1.42 | 0.70 |
| 2015 | 440,225 | 5,093 | 3,510 | 7,134 | 1,583 | 1.45 | 0.49 |
| 2016 | 428,381 | 4,240 | 3,985 | 6,758 | 255 | 1.06 | 0.59 |
| 2017 | 394,650 | 5,777 | 3,375 | 5,992 | 2,402 | 1.71 | 0.56 |
| 2018 | 392,119 | 4,522 | 4,177 | 5,911 | 345 | 1.08 | 0.71 |
| 2019 | 392,950 | 4,249 | 3,853 | 6,024 | 396 | 1.10 | 0.64 |
| 2020 | 392,775 | 5,008 | 3,802 | 5,980 | 1,206 | 1.32 | 0.64 |
| 2021 | 393,731 | 3,172 | 3,877 | 5,978 | -705 | 0.82 | 0.65 |
| 2022 | 369,681 | 5,204 | 4,482 | 5,694 | 722 | 1.16 | 0.79 |
| 2023 | 385,938 | 5,847 | 3,811 | 5,536 | 2,036 | 1.53 | 0.69 |
| 2024 | 493,375 | 6,055 | 4,691 | 7,313 | 1,364 | 1.29 | 0.64 |
| Mean | 431,078 | 5,583 | 4,284 | 6,564 | 1,299 | 1.32 | 0.65 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.