A Comparative Evaluation of UAV-Based Remote Sensing and Geophysical Techniques for Landmine Detection on a Seeded Minefield

Reliable and scalable landmine detection technologies are essential for humanitarian mine action (HMA), yet standardized benchmarks for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based sensing in operationally relevant environments remain limited. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of 34 multimodal datasets acquired over a standardized seeded test site for landmine and unexploded ordnance detection. Nine sensing modalities, including RGB, thermal, multispectral, hyperspectral, LiDAR, and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), are evaluated using the Anomaly, Identifiable Anomaly, Unique Identifiable Anomaly (AIU) index to establish a unified framework for quantifying detection fidelity. Results indicate that RGB imagery achieves the highest surface detection rate (94.8%), with 45.4% of targets classified as uniquely identifiable, reducing false-positive risk. For sub-surface detection, handheld electromagnetic induction (EMI) and magnetometry exceed 95% detection for ferrous items but fall below 10% for plastic ordnance. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is the only modality capable of detecting buried plastic targets (55.6% for cart-based systems), whereas UAV-mounted GPR remains limited (18.2%) at current operational flight heights. Based on the comparative analysis, we discuss the gaps in current detection capabilities, compare false positive rates across modalities, and perform a cost-benefit analysis fitting contamination scenario with the most cost effective detection method. All datasets are publicly released (https://zenodo.org/records/19100554) along with an interactive web-map (https://staging.dmsamfvv1bhon.amplifyapp.com/) to support reproducible benchmarking and cross-modality comparison in UAV-enabled explosive hazard detection.