Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death worldwide,
highlighting the need for more reliable and efficient diagnostic tools
beyond conventional methods. Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly
Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL), has shown strong potential
for detecting obstructive CAD by learning complex patterns from
Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
(CCTA) data. This rapid systematic review assesses and compares the
diagnostic performance and methodological quality of AI models built for
CAD prediction using ECG and CCTA data. A systematic search following
PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted for primary studies published between
2021 and 2025. Eleven studies were included, six using ECG data and five
using CCTA data. Methodological quality was evaluated using the PROBAST+AI
tool. ECG-based models achieved AUC (0.72--0.961); however, only 33\% of
these studies used external validation cohorts. CCTA-based models showed
slightly stronger top-end performance, with AUC (0.77--0.97), and were
more methodologically rigorous, with 80\% applying external validation.
Despite these strong results, PROBAST+AI assessment revealed a high risk
of bias in 90.9\% of the included studies, largely due to weaknesses in
the analysis domain, including poor handling of missing data and the
absence of model calibration reporting. AI models show strong diagnostic
accuracy for CAD, with CCTA-based approaches demonstrating greater
validation maturity. However, the widespread methodological bias means
these tools should currently support clinical decision-making rather than
replace standard diagnostic methods. Future studies should focus on
prospective multi-centre validation and the use of multimodal data