Submitted:
23 April 2026
Posted:
08 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Monitoring Site and Sampling
2.2. Analytical Methods
2.3. Meteorological Data
2.4. Time Series Decomposition
2.5. Uncertainty Estimation
2.6. Meteorological Correlations
2.7. Diagnostic Ratio Analysis
2.8. Bayesian Mixture Modelling
3. Results
3.1. Overview of Concentrations
| Compound | HS (95% CI) | NHS (95% CI) | W/S |
|---|---|---|---|
| BaP | 1.40 [1.20-1.63] | 0.14 [0.11-0.17] | 10.1 |
| BbF | 2.20 [1.91-2.51] | 0.27 [0.22-0.32] | 8.2 |
| BkF | 0.72 [0.65-0.80] | 0.14 [0.12-0.16] | 5.3 |
| IcdP | 0.90 [0.79-1.03] | 0.13 [0.12-0.15] | 6.8 |
| BghiP | 0.68 [0.60-0.77] | 0.12 [0.10-0.13] | 5.9 |
| BaA | 1.29 [1.11-1.46] | 0.15 [0.13-0.17] | 8.5 |
| Chr | 1.26 [1.10-1.41] | 0.13 [0.11-0.15] | 9.6 |
| DahA | 0.14 [0.12-0.16] | 0.05 [0.05-0.06] | 2.6 |
3.2. Health Risk Assessment
3.3. Time Series Decomposition
3.4. COVID-19 Lockdown Signal
3.5. Meteorological Controls
3.6. Diagnostic Ratio Analysis
| Ratio | Mean (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| IcdP/(IcdP+BghiP) | 0.52 [0.51-0.52] |
| BaA/(BaA+Chr) | 0.54 [0.53-0.54] |
| Flu/(Flu+Pyr) | 0.38 [0.37-0.39] |
| BaP/BghiP | 2.14 [1.77-2.55] |
Fla/(Fla+Pyr).
BaP/BghiP.
IcdP/(IcdP+BghiP).
BaA/(BaA+Chr).
3.7. Source Classification by Mixture Modelling


4. Discussion
4.1. Seasonal Dynamics and Comparison with the Literature
4.2. Health Risk Implications
4.3. Role of Meteorology
4.4. COVID-19 Lockdown as a Natural Experiment
4.5. Methodological Contributions and Future Directions
5. Conclusions
- 1.
- A pronounced and statistically robust seasonal cycle, with winter-to-summer mean ratios ranging from 2.6 (DahA) to 10.1 (BaP) and median concentrations up to 12× higher in the heating season, driven primarily by residential biomass combustion.
- 2.
- BaP peak concentrations reaching 6.7 ng m−3 during meteorological stagnation episodes — well above the EU annual target of 1 ng m−3 — with associated heating-season ILCR values of , two orders of magnitude above the acceptable risk threshold.
- 3.
- The iterative missing-value-robust moving-average decomposition revealed that the residual PAH component (RT) retains a persistent winter-to-summer ratio of 2–4 after removal of the primary seasonal cycle, indicating the presence of year-round baseline sources — predominantly traffic and industrial emissions — whose contribution is partially masked by the dominant heating-season signal in raw concentration data.
- 4.
- Strong negative Spearman correlations of all HMW congeners with air temperature () and wind speed, and positive correlations with relative humidity, quantifying the meteorological modulation of PAH episode intensity.
- 5.
- A clear lockdown fingerprint in spring 2020 demonstrating that near-background PAH conditions ( ng m−3) are achievable when anthropogenic activities are substantially suppressed, with concentrations ≈85% below the seasonal prediction.
- 6.
- A novel application of the MML-SNOB Bayesian mixture model to diagnostic PAH ratios, identifying residential biomass combustion as the dominant winter source class (% of HS samples) and vehicular emissions as the dominant summer class (% of NHS samples), supported by bootstrap-validated diagnostic ratios (Table 5).
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yang, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; et al. Exposure to atmospheric particulate matter-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their health effects: A review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Toxicology Program. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: 15 Listings. Report on Carcinogens, Fifteenth Edition; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS): Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- IARC Working Group. Chemical Agents and Related Occupations. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 100F; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2004/107/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 Relating to Arsenic, Cadmium, Mercury, Nickel and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air. Off. J. Eur. Union 2004, L 23, 3–16. [Google Scholar]
- European Environment Agency (EEA). Air Quality in Europe – 2018 Report. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Safo-Adu, G.; Attiogbe, F.; Emahi, I.; Ofosu, F. A review of the sources, distribution sequences, and health risks associated with exposure to atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Cogent Eng. 2023, 10, 2199511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsiodra, I.; Grivas, G.; Tavernaraki, K.; Bougiatioti, A.; Apostolaki, M.; Paraskevopoulou, D.; Tsagkaraki, M.; Zarmpas, P.; Oikonomou, K.; Theodosi, C.; et al. Annual Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Urban Environments Linked to Idling Automobiles and Biomass Burning. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 17865–17883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riccio, A.; Chianese, E.; Monaco, D.; Costagliola, M.; Perretta, G.; Prati, M.; Agrillo, G.; Esposito, A.; Gasbarra, D.; Shindler, L.; et al. Real-world automotive particulate matter and PAH emission factors and profile concentrations: Results from an urban tunnel experiment in Naples, Italy. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 141, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riccio, A.; Chianese, E.; Tirimberio, G.; Prati, M.V. Emission Factors of Inorganic Ions from Road Traffic: A Case Study from the City of Naples (Italy). Transp. Res. Part D. Transp. Environ. 2017, 54, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chianese, E.; Tirimberio, G.; Riccio, A. PM2.5 and PM10 in the Urban Area of Naples: Chemical Composition, Chemical Properties and Influence of Air Masses Origin. J. Atmos. Chem. 2019, 76, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chianese, E.; Tirimberio, G.; Appolloni, L.; Dinoi, A.; Contini, D.; Di Gilio, A.; Palmisani, J.; Cotugno, P.; Miniero, D.V.; Dusek, U.; et al. Chemical characterisation of PM10 from ship emissions: a study on samples from hydrofoil exhaust stacks. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 17723–17736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chianese, E.; Galletti, A.; Giunta, G.; Landi, T.; Marcellino, L.; Montella, R.; Riccio, A. Spatiotemporally resolved ambient particulate matter concentration by fusing observational data and ensemble chemical transport model simulations. Ecol. Model. 2018, 385, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yunker, M.B.; Macdonald, R.W.; Vingarzan, R.; Mitchell, R.H.; Goyette, D.; Sylvestre, S. PAHs in the Fraser River Basin: A Critical Appraisal of PAH Ratios as Indicators of PAH Source and Composition. Org. Geochem. 2002, 33, 489–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siudek, P. Seasonal distribution of PM2. 5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as a critical indicator of air quality and health impact in a coastal-urban region of Poland. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 827, 154375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monaco, D.; Riccio, A.; Chianese, E.; Adamo, P.; Di Rosa, S.; Fagnano, M. Chemical Characterization and Spatial Distribution of PAHs and Heavy Hydrocarbons in Rural Sites of Campania Region, South Italy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 14993–15003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collivignarelli, M.C.; Abbà, A.; Bertanza, G.; Pedrazzani, R.; Ricciardi, P.; Carnevale Miino, M. Lockdown for CoViD-2019 in Milan: What Are the Effects on Air Quality? Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 732, 139280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pala, D.; Baj, A.; Strano, S.; Manzoni, A.; Salinelli, G.; Rossi, V.; Ferrante, S. Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on PM Concentrations in an Italian Northern City: A Study in Pavia Using 23 Air Quality Sensors. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solazzo, E.; Riccio, A.; Van Dingenen, R.; Valentini, L.; Galmarini, S. Evaluation and Uncertainty Estimation of the Impact of Air Quality Modelling on Crop Yields and Premature Deaths Using a Multi-model Ensemble. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 1437–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 8000D: Determinative Chromatographic Separations. Technical Report, 2014. SW-846 Update V.
- Helsel, D.R. Statistics for censored environmental data using Minitab and R; John Wiley & Sons, 2011; Vol. 77. [Google Scholar]
- Zurbenko, I.G.; Smith, D. Kolmogorov–Zurbenko filters in spatiotemporal analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2018, 10, e1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moisan, S. nanconvn: MATLAB Convolution Correcting for NaN Values. MATLAB File Exch. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. WHO Regional Publications, European Series No. 91, 2000.
- Sánchez-Piñero, J.; Moreda-Piñeiro, J.; Turnes-Carou, I.; Fernández-Amado, M.; Muniategui-Lorenzo, S.; López-Mahía, P. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric particulate matter (PM10) at a Southwestern Europe coastal city: status, sources and health risk assessment. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2021, 14, 1325–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. EPA/600/R-09/052F, 2011.
- Nisbet, I.C.; Lagoy, P.K. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1992, 16, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Food. EFSA J. 2008, 724, 1–114.
- Dat, N.; Chang, M. Review on characteristics of PAHs in atmosphere, anthropogenic sources and control technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallace, C.S.; Dowe, D.L. MML Mixture Modelling of Multi-state, Poisson, vonMises Circular and Gaussian Distributions. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 1997, Vol. R1, PMLR, 529–536. [Google Scholar]
- Dale, M.; Allison, L.; Dale, P. Model selection using Minimal Message Length: an example using pollen data. Community Ecol. 2010, 11, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, B.; et al. Size distribution of particulate PAHs and their health risks: a review. J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 88, 370–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stull, R.B. An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology; Springer Science & Business Media, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Sirignano, C.; Riccio, A.; Chianese, E.; Ni, H.; Zenker, K.; D’Onofrio, A.; Meijer, H.A.; Dusek, U. High contribution of biomass combustion to PM2. 5 in the city centre of Naples (Italy). Atmosphere 2019, 10, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altuwayjiri, A.; Soleimanian, E.; Moroni, S.; Palomba, P.; Borgini, A.; De Marco, C.; Sioutas, C. The Impact of Stay-Home Policies during Coronavirus-19 Pandemic on the Chemical and Toxicological Characteristics of Ambient PM2.5 in the Metropolitan Area of Milan, Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 758, 143582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paatero, P.; Tapper, U. Positive Matrix Factorization: A Non-Negative Factor Model with Optimal Utilization of Error Estimates of Data Values. Environmetrics 1994, 5, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Parameter | Heating Season (HS) | Non-Heating Season (NHS) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR | |
| PAH | 10.4 | 4.7–21.9 | 0.8 | 0.8–1.9 |
| BaP | 2.5 | 0.9–4.7 | <0.05 | <0.05–0.05 |
| IcdP | 1.9 | 0.5–3.6 | <0.05 | <0.05–0.05 |
| BbF | 5.2 | 2.0–8.7 | <0.05 | <0.05–0.10 |
| BkF | 1.6 | 0.6–2.4 | <0.05 | <0.05–0.05 |
| BaA | 3.1 | 0.8–5.0 | <0.05 | <0.05–0.15 |
| DahA | 0.8 | 0.05–1.6 | <0.05 | <0.05–0.05 |
| Chr | 4.1 | 1.3–6.1 | 0.05 | <0.05–0.15 |
| BghiP | 1.3 | 0.4–2.2 | <0.05 | <0.05–0.05 |
| PM2.5 | 72 | 40–107 | 14 | 9–20 |
| Compound | HS (95% CI) | NHS (95% CI) | HS/NHS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BaP | 0.012 [0.011-0.014] | 0.0036 [0.0034-0.0037] | 3.5 |
| BbF | 0.023 [0.02-0.027] | 0.005 [0.0046-0.0053] | 4.6 |
| BkF | 0.0094 [0.0085-0.01] | 0.0041 [0.0039-0.0043] | 2.3 |
| IcdP | 0.01 [0.0089-0.011] | 0.0043 [0.0041-0.0045] | 2.3 |
| BghiP | 0.0087 [0.0078-0.0097] | 0.0041 [0.0039-0.0043] | 2.1 |
| BaA | 0.014 [0.013-0.016] | 0.0053 [0.005-0.0056] | 2.7 |
| Chr | 0.015 [0.013-0.016] | 0.004 [0.0039-0.0042] | 3.6 |
| DahA | 0.0023 [0.0021-0.0025] | 0.0032 [0.0031-0.0034] | 0.71 |
| Congener | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAH | ||||
| BaP | ||||
| IcdP | ||||
| BbF | ||||
| BkF | ||||
| BaA | ||||
| Chr | ||||
| BghiP | ||||
| Fla |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).