Submitted:
07 May 2026
Posted:
08 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Test Specimens
2.2. Quasi-Static Compression Tests
2.3. Impact Tests
3. Results
3.1. Quasi-Static Compression Tests
3.1.1. Repeatability Verification
3.1.2. Influence of Indenter Diameter
3.1.3. Influence of SOC
3.2. Drop-Weight Impact Tests
3.2.1. Repeatability Verification
3.2.2. Influence of Indenter Diameter
3.2.3. Effect of Impact Velocity on Cell Failure Characteristics
3.2.4. Effect of State of Charge on Cell Failure Characteristics
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Central Committee of the Communist Party of China State Council Opinions on Fully; Accurately and Comprehensively Implementing the New Development Concept to Achieve Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/24/content_5644613.htm (accessed on 17 April 2026).
- Duan, X.Y.; Zhu, K.K. Quantitative Analysis of Policy Texts on New Energy Vehicle Batteries in China. Resour. Dev. Mark. 2025, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.L.; Guo, L.; Yang, Z.Y.; et al. Research on the Optimization of Integrated Energy Systems Considering the Interaction between Electric Vehicle Swap Stations and Multi-Energy Regulation. Power Syst. Technol. 2025, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, Y.S.; Jing, W.T. Innovation-Driven Developments in Automotive Lithium-Ion Battery Technologies: A Patent-Based Comparison of China and the United States. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2025, 14(10), 4043–4053. [Google Scholar]
- Li, T.; Ying, L.; Xu, J.Q.; et al. Establishment and Multiple Conditions Validation of Homogenization Model of Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells. Mech. Electr. Technol. 2025, (01), 21–26. [Google Scholar]
- Sahraei, E.; Kahn, M.; Meier, J.; et al. Modelling of Cracks Developed in Lithium-Ion Cells under Mechanical Loading. RSC Adv. 2015, 5(98), 80369–80380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahraei, E.; Meier, J.; Weerzbicki, T. Characterizing and Modeling Mechanical Properties and Onset of Short Circuit for Three Types of Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells. J. Power Sources 2014, 247, 503–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, L.I.; Yong, X.; Guan, H.C.; et al. Comparative Study of Mechanical-Electrical-Thermal Responses of Pouch, Cylindrical, and Prismatic Lithium-Ion Cells under Mechanical Abuse. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2018, 61(3), 383–394. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, H.; Xia, Y.; Zhou, Q. Mechanical Damage in a Lithium-Ion Pouch Cell under Indentation Loads. J. Power Sources 2017, 357, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tancogne-Dejean, T.; Grollau, V.; Mohr, D. Strain Rate Dependent Plasticity of Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells: Experiments and Simulations. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2022, 159, 104048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Bai, Y.; Luo, H.; et al. Dynamic Multi-Physics Behaviors and Performance Loss of Cylindrical Batteries upon Low-Velocity Impact Loading. Energy Environ. Mater. 2024, 7(6), 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.J. Load Deformation Failure Test and Simulation Analysis for Internal Configuration of Prismatic Lithium-Ion Batteries on New Energy Vehicle. Ph.D. Thesis, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T.; Meng, K.P.; Liu, Y.Z.; et al. Effects of Impact Mass on Dynamic Mechanical Responses and Failure Modes of Square Lithium-Ion Batteries under Impact Loading. Explos. Shock Waves 2025, 45(2), 49–64. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B.; Jia, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Safety Issues Caused by Internal Short Circuits in Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6(43), 21475–21484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M.Z.; Hu, L.L.; Chen, S.R.; et al. Different Mechanical-Electrochemical Coupled Failure Mechanism and Safety Evaluation of Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells under Dynamic and Quasi-Static Mechanical Abuse. J. Power Sources 2021, 497, 229897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kisters, T.; Gilaki, M.; Nau, S.; et al. Modeling of Dynamic Mechanical Response of Li-Ion Cells with Homogenized Electrolyte-Solid Interactions. J. Energy Storage 2022, 49, 104069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Kumar, A.; Simynovic, S.; et al. Mechanical Modeling and Testing of Pouch Cells under Various Loading Conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167(13), 130537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Xia, Y.; Xing, B.; et al. Mechanical-Electrical-Thermal Responses of Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells under Dynamic Loading: A Comparative Study between Fresh Cells and Aged Ones. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2022, 166, 104237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standardization Administration of China. GB/T 38031-2025: Safety Requirements for Traction Batteries for Electric Vehicles [S]. Beijing: China Quality Standards Publishing and Media Co., Ltd., 2025.
- Chung, S.H.; Tancogne-Dejean, T.; Zhu, J.; et al. Failure in Lithium-Ion Batteries under Transverse Indentation Loading. J. Power Sources 2018, 389, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.F.; Liu, T.; Zhang, M. Study on Expansion Internal Stress of LFP Battery during Charging or Discharging. J. Yanshan Univ. 2025, 49(2), 130–136. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, H.L. Structural Failure Mechanism and Modelling of Lithium-Ion Battery Pouch Cell under Mechanical Abuse. Ph.D. Thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.Z.; Liu, X.C.; Bai, C.Y.; et al. Dynamic Response Characteristics of Soft-Pack Lithium Batteries for Light Weight Consumer Drones under Mechanical Strong Impact Loads. Explos. Shock Waves 2025, 45(2), 65–75. [Google Scholar]



















| Test group | Indenter diameter/mm | SOC/% |
| Q1 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Q2 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Q3 | 12.7 | 0 |
| Q4 | 6.0 | 20 |
| Q5 | 9.0 | 20 |
| Q6 | 12.7 | 20 |
| Test group | Impact speed/(m⋅s-1) | Indenter diameter/mm | SOC/% |
| D1 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 0 |
| D2 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 0 |
| D3 | 1.0 | 12.7 | 0 |
| D4 | 1.0 | 12.7 | 20 |
| D5 | 1.0 | 12.7 | 50 |
| D6 | 1.0 | 12.7 | 100 |
| D7 | 3.0 | 12.7 | 0 |
| D8 | 5.0 | 12.7 | 0 |
| Test group | Indenter diameter /mm | SOC/% |
Failure displacement /mm |
Peak load force /kN |
Peak temperature /℃ |
| Q1 | 6.0 | 0 | 2.64 | 3.296 | 56.4 |
| Q4 | 20 | 2.74 | 3.414 | 70.4 | |
| Q2 | 9.0 | 0 | 3.56 | 7.273 | 59.1 |
| Q5 | 20 | 3.60 | 7.722 | 192.2 | |
| Q3 | 12.7 | 0 | 4.10 | 10.967 | 65.7 |
| Q6 | 20 | 4.15 | 11.517 | 219.6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).