Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Floristic Diversity, Structure, and Carbon Storage of a Sub-Andean Forest in Southwestern Colombia: The Case of the El Mangón

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

06 May 2026

Posted:

07 May 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Sub-Andean forests of the Colombian Central Cordillera are among the most biodiverse and threatened Neotropical ecosystems, yet their floristic, structural, and carbon dynamics remain poorly documented. We characterized the floristic diversity, vegetation structure, and aboveground carbon storage of the El Mangón sub-Andean forest remnant (24 ha; 1,600–1,700 m a.s.l., Cauca, Colombia) using free collections across the total area and a structural inventory in five 50 × 4 m transects (498 individuals, 35 species). A total of 281 species, 209 genera, and 100 families were recorded; epiphytes represented 44.13% of species, exceeding typical values (25–35%) for this forest type. Diversity indices were intermediate (H′ = 2.55; DMg = 5.47; 1−D = 0.89). Palicourea crocea dominated structurally (IVI = 45.12) and concentrated 31.2% of total carbon storage (894.41 kg·ha⁻¹; total = 2,866.23 kg·ha⁻¹). Three novel carbon indices (CVI, CCEI, CSI) integrate storage magnitude with ecological efficiency and spatial stability. The CSI was highest in low-aggregation species (1,618.23), with no significant differences among spatial groups (Kruskal–Wallis, p = 0.088). El Mangón ranks among the most diverse sub-Andean remnants of southwestern Colombia, underscoring its conservation priority in an increasingly fragmented landscape.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Sub-Andean forests constitute one of the most biodiverse and threatened ecosystems in the Neotropics. Distributed between 1,000 and 2,400 m a.s.l. in Colombia, they harbor exceptional levels of species richness and endemism, function as biological corridors among altitudinal zones, and provide critical ecosystem services, including hydrological regulation, soil retention, and carbon storage [1,2]. In Colombia, these forests have lost more than 74% of their original cover because of agricultural-frontier expansion, selective timber extraction, and land-use conversion [3]. The most recent national monitoring data indicate that 113,608 ha were deforested in Colombia during 2024 [4], and that in the department of Cauca Forest loss reached 790.34 ha that same year [5], a trend that severely affects connectivity among fragments and alters species composition in sub-Andean landscapes [6]. The Colombian Central Cordillera concentrates an especially significant fraction of this threatened diversity: its sub-Andean forests are dominated by families such as Lauraceae, Melastomataceae, Rubiaceae, and Piperaceae [7,8,9], and represent one of the systems with the greatest floristic-documentation deficit in the country [2,10].
Despite recognition of their ecological importance, knowledge of the floristic diversity and structure of the sub-Andean forests of the Colombian Central Cordillera remains fragmentary. Available studies in the region document between 62 and 431 species per site, with methodological differences that hinder direct comparison [11,12,13,14,15], and only a few simultaneously integrate floristic characterization, quantitative structural analysis, and carbon-storage estimation [16]. This gap is particularly relevant given that montane secondary forests accumulate between 40 and 70% of the carbon stored in comparable mature forests [17,18] and play an increasing role in national climate-change mitigation strategies. The development of functional indices that integrate carbon storage with individual capture efficiency and the stability associated with species spatial-distribution patterns represents a scarcely explored approach in Colombian floristic studies, with direct potential to guide conservation and restoration strategies based on functional efficiency.
The El Mangón forest remnant, located in the corregimiento of Tunía, municipality of Piendamó, department of Cauca (1,600–1,700 m a.s.l.; 24 ha), constitutes a case of special interest for the landscape ecology of fragmented areas of the Central Cordillera. With an uninterrupted history of private conservation since 1912, when the Gómez family decided to protect the forest in a context of growing agricultural pressure, this remnant represents a rare example of a sub-Andean forest with low direct intervention embedded in an intensive agricultural mosaic. The ongoing initiative to declare the property as a Natural Reserve of Civil Society (Reserva Natural de la Sociedad Civil, RNSC) confers immediate relevance on its floristic and functional characterization for private-conservation policy in Colombia. Until now, no scientific study had comprehensively documented its floristic diversity, vegetation structure, or aboveground carbon-storage capacity.
The general objective of this study was to characterize the floristic diversity, vegetation structure, and carbon storage of the El Mangón sub-Andean forest, in order to contribute to the knowledge of the sub-Andean ecosystems of the Colombian Central Cordillera and to provide baseline information for their conservation and management. Specific objectives were: (i) to inventory and analyze the taxonomic composition of the remnant through free collections across the total area (24 ha); (ii) to characterize the horizontal and vertical structure of the forest through systematic transect-based sampling; (iii) to estimate aboveground biomass and carbon storage by species and to interpret the results using the Carbon Capture Efficiency Index (CCEI) and the Carbon Sustainability Index (CSI), which integrate storage magnitude with individual efficiency and spatial stability of species; and (iv) to compare the findings with analogous studies in sub-Andean forests of southwestern Colombia and the Central Cordillera.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The El Mangón forest remnant is in the corregimiento of Tunía, municipality of Piendamó, department of Cauca, Colombia ((2º40´52.2" N, 76º32´25.5" W), covering an area of 24 ha between 1,600 and 1,700 m a.s.l. The site has a mean annual temperature of 18 °C and an annual precipitation of 2,300 mm. It is crossed by three water bodies (Colcha, Espino, and Quebrada Grande streams) and contains a water spring in its interior (Figure 1). The conservation history dates to 1912, when the Gómez family decided to protect the forest in the face of growing agricultural pressure in the region, an initiative sustained until the present and oriented toward declaring the property as a Natural Reserve of Civil Society (RNSC).

2.2. Study Design and Component Distinction

This study comprises two methodologically differentiated components. Component I (floristic inventory) consisted in documenting total diversity through free collections across the 24 ha, recording 281 species in 209 genera and 99 families (Supplementary Material, Appendix I). Component II (structural and functional analysis) was based on systematic sampling in fixed-area transects: 35 species and 498 individuals in 0.1 ha (five 50 × 4 m transects). All alpha diversity, horizontal and vertical structure, biomass, and carbon analyses correspond exclusively to Component II, unless otherwise indicated.

2.3. Free Floristic Inventory (Component I)

Twelve field expeditions were conducted between June 2024 and June 2025, following the free-collection methodology for floristic inventories [21]. Each expedition involved a team of two to four botanical collectors, with an average duration of eight hours of sampling effort (total effort: ≈96 person-hours). Collections covered the total area of the remnant (24 ha), including previously inaccessible interior forest zones. All groups of vascular plants and bryophytes were collected, with emphasis on epiphytes, lianas, and ferns. Taxonomic identification was performed using: (a) dichotomous keys and monographs of the Flora of Colombia [2,7]; (b) reference collections of the CAUP Herbarium (Universidad del Cauca); (c) virtual collections of GBIF and COL; and (d) nomenclatural verification in World Flora Online (WFO) [40]. Reference specimens were deposited at the CAUP Herbarium under collection numbers Lelopez-4000 to Lelopez-4281.

2.4. Structural Sampling via Transects (Component II)

For the structural analysis, five 50 × 4 m transects (total area = 0.1 ha; sampling intensity = 0.42% of the remnant area) were systematically distributed in the interior of the forest, separated from each other by a minimum of 10 m. In each transect, all arboreal and shrubby individuals with circumference at breast height (CBH) ≥ 5 cm (equivalent to DBH ≥ 1.59 cm) were recorded. For each individual we measured: CBH (measuring tape ± 1 mm), total height (Ht) and stem height (Hf) using a Suunto clinometer, and relative spatial coordinates within the transect.
DBH (cm) = CBH (cm) / π
Conversion of circumference to diameter at breast height, applied uniformly to all recorded individuals.
To evaluate the completeness of the structural inventory, we performed: (a) individual-based rarefaction curves by transect, standardized to the smallest sampling unit size (n = 52 individuals; transect 1); and (b) asymptotic diversity estimation using Hill numbers (q = 0, 1 and 2) with 95% confidence intervals computed by bootstrap resampling (999 iterations) using the iNEXT package [35] in R [36].

2.5. Alpha Diversity and Horizontal Structure (Component II)

Standard alpha diversity indices were calculated for the 35 species and 498 individuals recorded in the transects:
H′ = −∑(pi · ln pi)
Shannon–Wiener; pi = proportion of individuals of species i.
DMg = (S − 1) / ln N
Margalef; S = number of species; N = number of individuals.
1 − D = 1 − ∑(pi²)
Simpson (complement); pi = proportion of individuals of species i.
J′ = H′ / ln S
Pielou's evenness; S = number of species.
d = Nmax / N
Berger–Parker; Nmax = individuals of the most abundant species; N = total individuals.
The Importance Value Index (IVI) was calculated as the sum of relative abundance, relative frequency, and relative dominance of each species, with a theoretical maximum of 300 [21]. The spatial distribution pattern was evaluated using the Pielou aggregation index:
Ga = Do / De
Ga = aggregation index; Do = observed density; De = expected density under random distribution. Ga < 1: tendency toward dispersion; 1 ≤ Ga ≤ 2: tendency toward clumping; Ga > 2: aggregated pattern.
The mixture coefficient was calculated as CM = (number of species / number of individuals) [7].

2.6. Vertical Structure and Allometric Analysis (Component II)

Vertical structural diversity was evaluated using the Pretzsch Index (A) [34]:
A = −∑(pij · ln pij) / ln(S × Z)
pij = proportion of individuals of species i in stratum j; S = number of species; Z = number of strata.
Vertical strata were defined at four levels: ground layer (< 1.5 m), shrub layer (1.5–5 m), sub-canopy (5–12 m), and canopy (> 12 m), following [12]. Class width for height and diameter distributions was determined using Scott's criterion [33]:
h = 3.5 · σ · n−1/3
h = class width; σ = standard deviation; n = number of individuals.
The Ogawa diagram [32] was constructed to visualize height distribution in relation to diameters, and the allometric relationship between Ht and Hf was evaluated using linear regression. Residual normality (Shapiro–Wilk) and homoscedasticity (Breusch–Pagan) assumptions were verified; R² and p-values are reported.

2.7. Biomass and Carbon Estimation (Component II)

Aboveground biomass (AGB) was estimated using the FAO volumetric methodology [26]:
AGB = VCC × WD × BEF
AGB = aboveground biomass (t·ha−1); VCC = stem volume with bark (m³·ha−1); WD = wood density (t·m−3); BEF = biomass expansion factor.
VCC = BA × Hf × 0.7
BA = basal area (m²·ha−1); Hf = mean stem height (m); 0.7 = form factor.
WD = 0.6 t·m−3 was used as the regional reference value for tropical Americas [26], and BEF = 1.74. Carbon content was estimated as C = AGB × 0.47 (IPCC convention [27]). Analyses were performed exclusively on Component II and results are expressed in kg·ha−1.

2.7.1. Proposed Carbon Indices (Component II)

To integrate carbon storage with the structural ecological importance of each species, three novel functional indices are proposed: the Carbon Valuation Index (CVI), the Carbon Capture Efficiency Index (CCEI), and the Carbon Sustainability Index (CSI).
CVIi = IVIi × (Ci / Ctotal)
CVI = Carbon Valuation Index; IVIi = IVI of species i; Ci = carbon stored by species i (kg·ha−1); Ctotal = total carbon in the sampling area (kg·ha−1).
CCEIi = Ci / (IVIi × Di)
CCEI = Carbon Capture Efficiency Index; Ci = carbon stored by species i (kg·ha−1); IVIi = Importance Value Index of species i; Di = density of species i (ind·ha−1).
For CSI estimation, a spatial factor (Fspatial) was assigned to each species according to its distribution pattern (Table 1):
CSIi = Ci × Fspatial,i × (1 + |H′i|)
CSIi = Carbon Sustainability Index of species i; Ci = stored carbon (kg·ha−1); Fspatial,i = spatial factor (Table 1); H′i = individual contribution of species i to the community Shannon index (absolute value).
The CSI of group g is calculated as the sum of the individual CSIs of all species in the group: CSIg = ∑CSIi for all species in group g.

2.8. Collection Permits and Ethical Declarations

Biological material collection was carried out under the Framework Collection Permit for Biological Specimens for Non-commercial Scientific Research, Permit 001040 of 30 May 2025, ANLA (Autoridad Nacional de Licencias Ambientales), in accordance with Resolution 1484 of 2014 of the Colombian Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (MADS). Specimens were deposited at the CAUP Herbarium of Universidad del Cauca under collection numbers Lelopez-4000 to Lelopez-4281.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data were organized in Microsoft Excel 2019. Statistical and ecological analyses were performed in R v4.3.0 [36], with packages vegan v2.6-4 [37], ggplot2 v3.4.0 [38], dplyr v1.1.2 [39], and iNEXT [35]. Hierarchical clustering for carbon functional groups was performed using Ward's method (Euclidean distance). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to the matrix of carbon, biomass, and structure variables with standardized variables (mean = 0, standard deviation = 1). PC1 explained 64.6% of the total variance and PC2 explained 26.3% (cumulative variance: 90.9%), indicating that both components adequately summarize the structural, ecological, and functional variation among the analyzed species. Comparison of CSI values among spatial-pattern groups was performed using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, with post hoc pairwise Wilcoxon comparisons and Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

3. Results

Results are presented in two differentiated blocks reflecting the two methodological components of the study (see Section 2.2). Component I corresponds to the free floristic inventory (24 ha): 281 species, 209 genera, 99 families. Component II corresponds to the structural sampling in five 50 × 4 m transects (0.1 ha): 35 species and 498 individuals. Unless otherwise indicated, all numerical values for IVI, diversity indices, biomass, and carbon refer to Component II.

3.1. Taxonomic Diversity and Floristic Richness (Component I — 24 ha)

A total of 281 species distributed in 209 genera and 99 families were recorded in the El Mangón forest remnant (Supplementary Material, Appendix I). The species/genus ratio (1.34), species/family ratio (2.84), and genus/family ratio (2.11) indicate a balanced taxonomic structure. The most diverse families were Poaceae (20 spp.), Asteraceae (13 spp.), and Orchidaceae (13 spp.) — 16.4% of total richness — which together with Polypodiaceae and Rubiaceae (10 spp. each), Piperaceae (9 spp.), Fabaceae and Melastomataceae (8 spp. each), and Bromeliaceae and Bryaceae (7 spp. each), accumulated 38.4% of species diversity (Table 2). The class distribution showed a predominance of Magnoliopsida (117 spp., 41.64%), followed by Liliopsida (53 spp., 18.86%) and Bryopsida (48 spp., 17.08%). Lecanoromycetes and Polypodiopsida contributed 24 spp. (8.54%) and 25 spp. (8.90%), respectively.

3.1.1. Growth Forms — Free Floristic Inventory (Component I)

Analysis of growth forms showed that epiphytes constituted the most diverse group with 124 spp. (44.13%), followed by herbs with 97 spp. (34.52%), shrubs with 31 spp. (11.03%), and trees with 25 spp. (8.90%). Hemiparasites and lianas were the least represented, with 2 spp. each (0.71%). The high proportion of epiphytes exceeded the typical values of 25–35% reported for Neotropical sub-Andean forests.

3.2. Alpha Diversity Indices (Component II — Transects, 35 spp., 498 ind.)

Species diversity analysis of Component II revealed a community of 35 species and 498 individuals. The Shannon–Wiener index (H′ = 2.55) indicated intermediate diversity characteristic of forests in intermediate succession; the Margalef index (DMg = 5.47) evidenced high species richness relative to sample size. Community structure exhibited low dominance (Simpson 1−D = 0.89; Pielou J′ = 0.72; Berger–Parker d = 0.17), confirming a relatively homogeneous distribution of abundances among the 35 sampled species (Figure 2).

3.2.1. Structural Sampling Completeness: Rarefaction and Asymptotic Estimation

Individual-based rarefaction analysis revealed differences in standardized richness among the five transects. Standardizing to n = 52 individuals (smallest transect size: transect 1), rarefied richness ranged from 10.85 spp. (transect 2; SE = 1.35) to 15.00 spp. (transect 1; reference), with intermediate values for transect 3 (13.46 ± 1.51), transect 5 (13.11 ± 1.40), and transect 4 (11.31 ± 1.19) (Figure 3).
Asymptotic extrapolation curves (Hill numbers, q = 0) showed that none of the five transects reached inventory saturation at the individual sampling unit scale: estimated asymptotic richness exceeded observed richness in all cases. Asymptotic estimates ranged from 20.1 spp. (transect 3; observed: 18; 95% CI: 18.0–34.1) to 32.9 spp. (transect 2; observed: 15; 95% CI: 15.0–58.7). Transect 3 was closest to saturation (relative completeness ≈ 90%), while transect 1 and transect 2 showed the largest gaps (completeness ≈ 49% and ≈ 46%, respectively; Table 3, Figure 4). These results confirm that sampling by individual transect is incomplete; the five transects combined allow adequate estimation of community patterns for the objectives of the present study.

3.3. Horizontal Structure of the Forest Remnant (Component II)

Analysis of horizontal structure revealed marked heterogeneity in the ecological importance of species, with IVI values ranging from 1.460 to 45.124 (scale 0–300). P. crocea (Rubiaceae) was the ecologically dominant species (IVI = 45.124; relative abundance = 45.12%; relative dominance = 22.21%), followed by Lacistema aggregatum (IVI = 22.181) and Heliconia griggsiana (IVI = 19.601). The fifteen most important species concentrated approximately 80% of total IVI, with the top ten accumulating 66.4% (Figure 5). Variation in stem size by species is summarized in Figure 6, where Myrcianthes hallii, Myrcia popayanensis, and Palicourea heterochroma displayed the largest median DBH values, while shrubby and palm species (Geonoma pinnatifrons, Coffea arabica, Citrus reticulata) presented the smallest size classes.
Of the species, 57.14% (20 spp.) exhibited Ga < 1 (low-aggregation distribution), while 25.71% (9 spp.) showed an aggregated pattern (Ga > 2). Olmedia aspera showed the highest degree of aggregation (Ga = 15.28), followed by P. crocea (Ga = 3.60) and G. pinnatifrons (Ga = 2.82). The mixture coefficient (CM = 0.070; 1/CM = 14.23) classified the ecosystem as structurally homogeneous.

3.4. Vertical Structure of the Forest Remnant (Component II)

The vertical structure revealed four clearly differentiated strata: lower stratum (0–8 m), middle stratum (8.1–12 m), upper stratum (12.1–18 m), and emergent stratum (18.1–33 m). The Pretzsch Index reached A = 3.21, equivalent to 64.93% of the theoretical maximum (4.94), indicating notable vertical structural complexity for a forest in active regeneration.
The Ogawa diagram (Figure 7) showed an asymmetric height distribution, with a strong concentration of individuals in lower and intermediate classes and a small number of dominant canopy trees. Mean height was 4.34 m (± 4.09 m). The allometric relationship between Ht and Hf was moderate but significant (R² = 0.506, p < 0.001). The lower stratum concentrated 91.77% of individuals (457 ind. of 32 spp.); the middle stratum 5.62% (28 ind. of 12 spp.); and the upper and emergent strata 2.61% (13 ind. of 8 spp.). The species-level distribution of total height (Figure 8) reveals that the tallest medians correspond to canopy trees such as Alchornea latifolia, Cinchona pubescens, and M. popayanensis, while the bulk of the assemblage exhibits modal heights below 5 m, consistent with an inverse-J pattern typical of secondary forests in active regeneration.
Volumetric calculations yielded 5.49 m³·ha−1 of stem (commercial) volume and 24.00 m³·ha−1 of total volume with bark, with P. crocea contributing the greatest volume (1.71 m³·ha−1 commercial; 6.70 m³·ha−1 total).

3.5. Biomass and Carbon of the Remnant (Component II)

Total aboveground carbon storage (Component II, 0.1 ha) was 2,866.23 kg·ha−1. P. crocea (Rubiaceae) showed the highest Carbon Valuation Index (CVI = 14.08) and the highest storage per hectare (894.41 kg·ha−1, equivalent to 31.2% of total carbon), followed by H. griggsiana (Heliconiaceae; CVI = 3.69) and Myrsine guianensis (Primulaceae; CVI = 1.63) (Figure 9). However, when efficiency rather than absolute storage is considered, C. arabica (Rubiaceae, introduced species of African origin) exhibited the highest Carbon Capture Efficiency Index (CCEI = 12.46), together with Myrsine coriacea (Primulaceae) and Ocotea oblonga (Lauraceae) (Figure 10).
Note on C. arabica: this cultivated species, native to Ethiopia and introduced to Colombia during the colonial period [23], occurs in the transects as remnant individuals from a coffee plantation with more than 50 years of history at the site, currently abandoned. C. arabica is therefore not a native component of the Colombian sub-Andean ecosystem. Its high CCEI value reflects specific physiological characteristics (photosynthetic efficiency under shade and high C/N ratio) rather than a central ecological function in the natural ecosystem; ecological implications are discussed in Section 4.5.
Functional-group analysis identified four clusters through hierarchical clustering: Group 1 (4 spp.) with mean storage of 343.56 kg·ha−1; Group 2 (represented by P. crocea) with the highest storage (894.41 kg·ha−1) and highest density (166 ind.); Group 3 (5 spp.) with low storage (25.29 kg·ha−1) but high mean density (121.6 ind.); and Group 4 with intermediate storage and density. PCA showed that PC1 (64.6% of variance) was influenced primarily by IVI, Simpson index, density, and relative abundance, while PC2 (26.3% of variance; cumulative variance: 90.9%) was associated with relative dominance, biomass, and carbon (Figure 11).

3.6. Carbon Sustainability Index (CSI) by Spatial Pattern (Component II)

Evaluation of CSI by spatial pattern revealed differences in cumulative values among distribution groups (Figure 12). The cumulative CSI of the low-aggregation group (20 spp.) was 1,618.24, dominated by H. griggsiana (560.15), M. coriacea (345.15), and C. arabica (230.84). The aggregated-pattern group (9 spp.) showed a cumulative CSI of 811.17, with P. crocea as the main contributor (580.75).
The Kruskal–Wallis test did not detect statistically significant differences in individual CSI values among the three spatial-pattern groups (H = 4.8579, df = 2, p = 0.088). Post hoc pairwise comparisons (Wilcoxon with Benjamini–Hochberg correction) confirmed that none of the group pairs differed significantly (low aggregation vs. aggregated: p = 0.21; low aggregation vs. tendency toward clumping: p = 0.12; aggregated vs. tendency toward clumping: p = 0.61). The higher cumulative CSI of the low-aggregation group reflects, in part, the larger number of species in that group (20 spp.) compared with the aggregated group (9 spp.); interpretation of cumulative totals must therefore be made with caution. The mean CSI per species was: 80.91 spp.−1 (low aggregation) and 90.13 spp.−1 (aggregated).

4. Discussion

4.1. Taxonomic Diversity and Floristic Richness

The floristic richness of the El Mangón remnant (281 spp., 209 gen., 99 fam.) is comparable to that reported for El Peñol, Antioquia (285 spp.; [1]) and surpasses records from other Cauca remnants such as Timbío, Hacienda Hato Viejo (151 spp.; [11]) and Popayán, Reserva Forestal Cajete (164 spp.; [3]). This level of richness confirms the patterns of high diversity characteristic of the sub-Andean forests of the Colombian Central Cordillera described by [7,9].
The predominance of Poaceae (20 spp.), Asteraceae (13 spp.), and Orchidaceae (13 spp.) partially departs from the general pattern of Colombian sub-Andean forests, where Rubiaceae and Melastomataceae typically dominate floristic composition [7,9]. This peculiarity may be explained by the specific ecological conditions of the site — especially the surrounding agricultural matrix and the disturbance history — which favour the establishment of grasses and composites typical of forest edges and intermediate successional stages [8]. The dominance of Rubiaceae in the structural analyses (driven mainly by P. crocea) indicates that the family is indeed important at the structural level, although not in terms of species diversity in the free inventory.
The high representation of epiphytes (44.13%) greatly exceeds the typical values of 25–35% reported for Neotropical sub-Andean forests [31]. This exceptional epiphytic richness can be attributed to: the permanence of forest cover since 1912 without clear-cutting, the presence of four well-differentiated vertical strata that increase microhabitat availability, and microclimate stability provided by the three water bodies crossing the remnant. The association between canopy vertical structural heterogeneity and epiphytic diversity has been documented in tropical Andean montane forests [10,30].

4.2. Diversity Indices and Community Structure

The Shannon–Wiener index (H′ = 2.55) places El Mangón in an intermediate range relative to other Colombian sub-Andean forests, below values reported for Puracé (H′ = 3.0; [12]) and Santander de Quilichao (H′ = 3.0; [13]), but above records from Timbío (H′ = 2.0; [14]) and Nariño (H′ = 2.0; [6]). Pielou's evenness (J′ = 0.72) indicates a moderately uniform abundance distribution, consistent with an ecosystem in successional reorganization.
Patterns of intermediate diversity and low dominance (Simpson 1−D = 0.89; Berger–Parker d = 0.17) are consistent with post-disturbance recovery dynamics described by [15] for tropical Andean forests in intermediate succession. The high Margalef index (DMg = 5.47) reflects high species richness relative to the structural sample size (0.1 ha).

4.3. Horizontal Structure and Spatial Distribution Patterns

The marked dominance of P. crocea (IVI = 45.124) constitutes an atypical pattern for sub-Andean forests. The concentration of 66.4% of total IVI in ten species coincides with patterns recorded in fragmented sub-Andean remnants, where the first twelve species typically accumulate ≈72% of IVI [16,17]. This pattern may be partly attributable to the placement of transects in areas of higher density of P. crocea (Ga = 3.60, aggregated pattern), an aspect that constitutes a methodological limitation discussed in Section 4.6.
The predominance of low-aggregation patterns (57.14% of species with Ga < 1) contrasts with the predominantly aggregated pattern of mature tropical forests and suggests active interspecific competition and seed-dispersal limitations, processes typical of intermediate successional stages [15,18]. The high aggregation of O. aspera (Ga = 15.28) and P. crocea (Ga = 3.60) indicates specific reproductive strategies and marked microenvironmental preferences.

4.4. Vertical Structure and Successional Position

The presence of four well-differentiated vertical strata and a Pretzsch Index of 3.21 (64.93% of the theoretical maximum) indicates notable vertical structural complexity for a forest in active regeneration. This value is consistent with the three to four well-defined strata reported for mature secondary forests of the Colombian Andes in advanced passive restoration [3,19], where gradual canopy differentiation generates light gradients that diversify microhabitats for recovering species.
The concentration of 91.77% of individuals in the lower stratum (0–8 m) reflects typical dynamics of recovering forests, where active regeneration generates high densities of young individuals [15,20]. The inverse-J pattern in diameter and height distributions is characteristic of communities with continuous recruitment and density-dependent mortality, suggesting a successional trajectory toward a forest with greater canopy dominance. The Ht–Hf allometric relationship (R² = 0.51, p < 0.001) indicates the architectural heterogeneity expected in secondary forests with high diversity of growth forms [20].

4.5. Carbon Storage and Sustainability

Carbon-storage patterns revealed marked functional heterogeneity among species. P. crocea showed the highest absolute storage (894.41 kg·ha−1, 31.2% of total: 2,866.23 kg·ha−1), while species with lower structural dominance exhibited higher per-individual capture efficiency (CCEI). Total storage is consistent with values reported for young secondary forests: recent studies show that secondary forests 25–30 years old accumulate between 40 and 70% of the carbon stored in comparable mature forests [17,18].
The presence of C. arabica (L.) among the species with the highest CCEI (12.46) requires careful interpretation. The presence of this species in the transects corresponds to remnant individuals from a coffee plantation with more than 50 years of history at the site, currently abandoned. C. arabica, native to the Ethiopian highlands and introduced to Colombia during the colonial period [23], is not a native component of the Colombian sub-Andean ecosystem. Its maintenance under the canopy of the remnant — without reproducing or expanding as part of the native assemblage — and its high CCEI may reflect specific physiological characteristics (photosynthetic efficiency under shade conditions; high C/N ratio) rather than a central ecological function in ecosystem carbon storage. This distinction is relevant both for the interpretation of the carbon analysis and for site management within the framework of the RNSC declaration, where the status of introduced species must be formally evaluated.
Functional-group analyses and PCA revealed clear trade-offs between diversity and carbon storage: the group dominated by P. crocea maximizes total storage but reduces structural diversity, while groups with a greater number of species generate greater functional heterogeneity. CSI results are consistent with the hypothesis that low-aggregation distribution patterns — by involving more species and a more homogeneous carbon distribution — may favour the long-term stability of stored carbon [24,25]. However, the Kruskal–Wallis test did not detect statistically significant differences in individual CSI values among groups (p = 0.088); this interpretation must therefore be considered tentative given the limited sampling scale (0.1 ha).

4.6. Study Limitations

This study presents limitations that must be considered in the interpretation of results. First, the structural sampling intensity (0.1 ha out of 24 ha, equivalent to 0.42%) is low for a forest with the reported spatial heterogeneity. The high abundance of P. crocea (IVI = 45.124) may partly reflect a bias of the transects toward areas of higher density of this species. Future studies with greater sampling intensity or stratified sampling designs will allow evaluation of the representativeness of the structural analysis.
Second, biomass estimation with a uniform WD value (0.6 t·m−3) may introduce biases in the comparative estimation of carbon by species; use of the Global Wood Density Database [27] and updated allometric models such as Chave et al. [28] would reduce this uncertainty. Third, the rarefaction analysis indicated that sampling by individual transect was incomplete (relative completeness between ≈46% and ≈90%), reinforcing the need to expand the structural inventory. Finally, the CVI, CCEI, and CSI indices proposed here are novel tools that require comparative validation at additional sites before generalising their applicability as indicators of forest carbon sustainability.

5. Conclusions

The El Mangón forest remnant represents one of the floristically richest sub-Andean fragments documented in the department of Cauca and in southwestern Colombia, with a species diversity that reflects the conservation potential of secondary forests with a prolonged history of private protection. The composition of the free inventory — with predominance of epiphytes (44.13%) and significant cryptogamic contributions — evidences the high degree of microclimate maturity and structural complexity accumulated over decades of passive restoration, positioning the site as a functional biodiversity refuge in an intensive agricultural landscape.
Structural analysis reveals a forest in an intermediate–advanced successional stage, with four well-differentiated vertical strata, high vertical structural diversity (Pretzsch Index = 3.21), and an inverse-J pattern in height and diameter distributions that confirms the viability of the active regeneration process. The structural dominance of P. crocea and the predominance of low-aggregation spatial-distribution patterns are indicators of a community in active competitive reorganization, compatible with a trajectory toward stages of greater forest complexity.
The proposed carbon indices (CVI, CCEI, and CSI) constitute complementary tools to standard floristic and structural analysis by integrating the magnitude of carbon storage with individual species efficiency and the stability associated with their spatial distribution patterns. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that spatial heterogeneity of the tree community may contribute to the long-term stability of stored carbon, although differences among spatial groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.088); this hypothesis requires validation with greater sampling intensity and temporal monitoring.
The potential declaration of the property as a Natural Reserve of Civil Society has a solid ecological basis: the documented floristic richness, the complex vertical structure, the carbon-storage potential, and the uninterrupted history of private conservation justify inclusion of the remnant in national biodiversity-protection instruments. Technical and legal support for the Corporación Autónoma Regional del Cauca is recommended for the declaration process as a landscape-conservation strategy in the municipality of Piendamó.
This contribution helps fill a floristic gap in the Colombian Central Cordillera and provides a quantitative baseline for long-term monitoring. For future research, we recommend: (i) increasing the intensity of structural sampling through stratified designs; (ii) updating the biomass estimation model with species-specific wood densities; (iii) formally documenting the status of introduced species present in the remnant; and (iv) evaluating the connectivity potential of the remnant with other forest fragments in the Río Piendamó corridor.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.E.L.-V.; methodology, L.E.L.-V. and D.J.M.-P.; software, L.E.L.-V. and D.J.M.-P.; validation, L.E.L.-V., D.J.M.-P., and J.F.C.-C.; formal analysis, L.E.L.-V. and D.J.M.-P.; investigation, L.E.L.-V., D.J.M.-P., and J.F.C.-C.; resources, L.E.L.-V.; data curation, L.E.L.-V. and D.J.M.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, L.E.L.-V.; writing—review and editing, L.E.L.-V., D.J.M.-P., and J.F.C.-C.; visualization, D.J.M.-P. and L.E.L.-V.; supervision, L.E.L.-V.; project administration, L.E.L.-V.; funding acquisition, L.E.L.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The botanical collection was conducted under the Framework Collection Permit for Biological Specimens for Non-commercial Scientific Research, Permit No. 001040 of 30 May 2025, ANLA (Autoridad Nacional de Licencias Ambientales), in accordance with Resolution 1484 of 2014 of the Colombian Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (MADS). Voucher specimens were deposited at the CAUP Herbarium of Universidad del Cauca (collection numbers Lelopez-4000 to Lelopez-4281).

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (L.E.L.-V.) upon reasonable request. The complete floristic inventory is provided as Supplementary Material (Appendix I).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Gómez family for allowing access to the El Mangón forest remnant and for their commitment to the conservation of the site over several generations. The Universidad del Cauca and its Biology Programme are thanked for logistical support. The CAUP Herbarium is acknowledged for facilitating the processing of botanical collections. We are also grateful to the SACHAWAIRA Plant Diversity Research Group for support in statistical analyses, and to the Latin American Ethnobotanical Group (GELA) for collaboration in taxonomic identification. We thank Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia for institutional support of co-author J.F.C.-C.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AGB Aboveground biomass
ANLA Autoridad Nacional de Licencias Ambientales
BA Basal area
BEF Biomass expansion factor
CAUP Herbario de la Universidad del Cauca
CBH Circumference at breast height
CCEI Carbon Capture Efficiency Index
CSI Carbon Sustainability Index
CVI Carbon Valuation Index
DBH Diameter at breast height; D

Appendix A

Appendix A.1
Complete floristic inventory of the El Mangón sub-Andean forest remnant (Tunía, Piendamó, Cauca, Colombia), comprising 281 species in 209 genera and 99 families, with taxonomic classification and growth-form designation.
Table A1. Complete floristic inventory of the El Mangón sub-Andean forest remnant (Component I; free collections across 24 ha; 281 species in 209 genera and 99 families). Species are listed alphabetically by family.
Table A1. Complete floristic inventory of the El Mangón sub-Andean forest remnant (Component I; free collections across 24 ha; 281 species in 209 genera and 99 families). Species are listed alphabetically by family.
Family Species
Acanthaceae Dianthera secunda, Lepidagathis alopecuroidea, Ruellia blechum
Actinidiaceae Saurauia scabra
Amaranthaceae Alternanthera porrigens, Alternanthera sessilis, Iresine diffusa
Anacardiaceae Mauria heterophylla, Toxicodendron striatum
Araceae Anthurium longistamineum, Anthurium microspadix
Araliaceae Oreopanax bogotensis
Arecaceae Geonoma pinnatifrons
Arthoniaceae Arthonia sp. 1, Herpothallon rubrocinctum, Herpothallon rubroechinatum
Aspleniaceae Asplenium aethiopicum, Asplenium theciferum
Asteraceae Acmella ciliata, Ageratum conyzoides, Austroeupatorium inulifolium, Baccharis latifolia, Baccharis trinervis, Bidens pilosa, Calea colombiana, Calea sessiliflora, Chromolaena laevigata, Critoniella acuminata, Elephantopus mollis, Pseudelephantopus spiralis, Sonchus asper
Bacidiaceae Bacidia biatorina
Bartramiaceae Breutelia chrysea
Brachytheciaceae Brachythecium plumosum, Brachythecium stereopoma
Brassicaceae Lepidium trianae
Bromeliaceae Cipuropsis capituligera, Racinaea fraseri, Racinaea penlandii, Racinaea tenuispica, Tillandsia complanata, Tillandsia fendleri, Tillandsia myriantha
Bryaceae Anomobryum conicum, Anomobryum julaceum, Brachymenium globosum, Bryum andicola, Bryum argenteum, Bryum densifolium, Rhodobryum beyrichianum
Cactaceae Rhipsalis sulcata
Caliciaceae Dirinaria applanata, Dirinaria confluens, Pyxine cocoes
Callicostaceae Hypnella diversifolia
Calymperaceae Syrrhopodon gaudichaudii
Campanulaceae Centropogon lehmannii
Candelariaceae Candelaria concolor
Chloranthaceae Hedyosmum bonplandianum, Hedyosmum goudotianum
Coccocarpiaceae Coccocarpia sp.
Coenogoniaceae Coenogonium linkii, Coenogonium pinetti
Collemataceae Leptogium granulatum, Leptogium phyllocarpum
Cordiaceae Varronia acuta
Costaceae Costus laevis
Cryphaeaceae Cryphaea patens, Cryphaea ramosa
Cucurbitaceae Melothria pendula
Cyatheaceae Cyathea horrida
Cyperaceae Cyperus hermaphroditus, Rhynchospora hieronymi, Rhynchospora nervosa
Daltoniaceae Adelothecium bogotense
Dicranaceae Bryohumbertia filifolia, Campylopus pilifer, Dicranella hilariana, Holomitrium flexuosum, Leucoloma cruegerianum
Dryopteridaceae Elaphoglossum burchellii, Elaphoglossum ellipsoideum, Elaphoglossum muscosum, Elaphoglossum paleaceum, Peltapteris flabellata, Polystichum platyphyllum
Euphorbiaceae Alchornea latifolia, Croton hibiscifolius, Euphorbia hirta
Fabaceae Acaciella angustissima, Desmodium purpusii, Inga densiflora, Inga edulis, Senna hirsuta, Senna pendula, Trifolium repens, Zornia reticulata
Fagaceae Quercus humboldtii
Fissidentaceae Fissidens asplenioides, Fissidens lagenarius, Fissidens polypodioides
Frullaniaceae Frullania sp.
Funariaceae Funaria hygrometrica
Gesneriaceae Besleria solanoides, Kohleria spicata
Graphidaceae Graphis chondroplaca
Heliconiaceae Heliconia burleana, Heliconia gaiboriana, Heliconia griggsiana
Herbertaceae Herbertus pensilis
Hypericaceae Vismia lauriformis
Hypnaceae Ctenidium malacodes, Ectropothecium leptochaeton, Isopterygium tenerifolium, Isopterygium tenerum, Mittenothamnium reptans
Hypoxidaceae Hypoxis decumbens
Lacistemataceae Lacistema aggregatum
Lamiaceae Clinopodium brownei, Mesosphaerum pectinatum, Mesosphaerum sidifolium, Ocimum campechianum, Salvia scutellarioides, Salvia tiliifolia, Scutellaria incarnata
Lauraceae Aiouea montana, Nectandra acutifolia, Nectandra mollis, Ocotea cuatrecasasii, Ocotea oblonga
Lecanoraceae Lecanora argentata
Lejeuneaceae Bryopteris filicina, Lejeunea sp.
Leucobryaceae Atractylocarpus longisetus, Leucobryum antillarum, Leucobryum giganteum
Loranthaceae Oryctanthus spicatus, Passovia pyrifolia
Lycopodiaceae Huperzia linifolia, Lycopodiella cernua, Lycopodium clavatum
Lythraceae Cuphea strigulosa
Malpighiaceae Stigmaphyllon bogotense
Malvaceae Heliocarpus americanus, Pavonia sepioides, Sida rhombifolia, Triumfetta bogotensis, Triumfetta rhomboidea
Marchantiaceae Marchantia chenopoda
Melastomataceae Arthrostemma ciliatum, Chaetogastra gracilis, Miconia desmantha, Miconia notabilis, Miconia octona, Miconia theaezans, Miconia versicolor, Rhynchanthera mexicana
Meteoriaceae Meteoridium remotifolium, Meteorium nigrescens, Squamidium leucotrichum
Mniaceae Plagiomnium rhynchophorum
Moraceae Olmedia aspera
Myrtaceae Myrcia popayanensis, Myrcianthes hallii, Psidium guineense, Syzygium jambos
Octoblepharaceae Octoblepharum albidum
Orchidaceae Comparettia falcata, Dichaea humilis, Dichaea pendula, Epidendrum melinanthum, Erycina pusilla, Lepanthes tracheia, Oncidium adelaidae, Pleurothallis cordata, Prosthechea grammatoglossa, Rodriguezia granadensis, Stelis argentata, Stelis pusilla, Trizeuxis falcata
Orobanchaceae Castilleja angustata
Orthotrichaceae Groutiella chimborazensis, Groutiella tomentosa, Macromitrium guatemaliense, Macromitrium cf. punctatum, Macromitrium richardii
Pallaviciniaceae Symphyogyna brasiliensis
Pannariaceae Parmeliella triptophylla
Parmeliaceae Crespoa crozalsiana, Hypotrachyna sp., Rimelia subisidiosa, Usnea sp.
Peltigeraceae Crocodia aurata, Sticta hypoglabra
Physciaceae Leucodermia leucomelos
Piperaceae Peperomia haematolepis, Peperomia silvivaga, Peperomia tetraphylla, Piper auritum, Piper capillipes, Piper catripense, Piper crassinervium, Piper hartwegianum, Piper hispidum
Plantaginaceae Plantago major
Poaceae Agrostis perennans, Andropogon aequatoriensis, Chloris radiata, Cynodon nlemfuensis, Digitaria ciliaris, Digitaria horizontalis, Eleusine indica, Eragrostis bahiensis, Homolepis glutinosa, Lasiacis divaricata, Lasiacis ligulata, Lasiacis nigra, Lasiacis sorghoidea, Oplismenus hirtellus, Panicum polygonatum, Paspalum candidum, Paspalum conjugatum, Pseudechinolaena polystachya, Steinchisma laxa, Zeugites americanus
Polygalaceae Polygala asperuloides
Polypodiaceae Campyloneurum brevifolium, Campyloneurum phyllitidis, Grammitis apiculata, Pecluma plumula, Pleopeltis astrolepis, Pleopeltis macrocarpa, Serpocaulon adnatum, Serpocaulon funckii, Serpocaulon lasiopus, Serpocaulon levigatum
Primulaceae Myrsine coriacea, Myrsine guianensis
Pteridaceae Adiantum andicola, Polytaenium lineatum, Radiovittaria gardneriana, Vittaria graminifolia
Pterobryaceae Calyptothecium duplicatum, Hildebrandtiella guyanensis
Ramalinaceae Lopezaria versicolor, Ramalina celastri
Roccellaceae Bactrospora sp.
Rosaceae Rubus idaeus, Rubus urticifolius
Rubiaceae Chiococca alba, Cinchona pubescens, Coccocypselum lanceolatum, Coffea arabica, Ladenbergia oblongifolia, Palicourea angustifolia, Palicourea crocea, Palicourea heterochroma, Palicourea thyrsiflora, Spermacoce capitata
Rutaceae Citrus reticulata
Salicaceae Banara guianensis
Schizaeaceae Anemia hirsuta, Anemia villosa
Selaginellaceae Selaginella diffusa
Sematophyllaceae Sematophyllum subpinnatum
Solanaceae Solanum americanum, Solanum caripense, Solanum quitoense, Solanum sisymbriifolium, Solanum umbellatum
Sphagnaceae Sphagnum meridense
Teloschistaceae Gallowayella weberi, Teloschistes flavicans
Thuidiaceae Thuidium peruvianum, Thuidium tomentosum
Urticaceae Cecropia angustifolia, Phenax sonneratii
Verbenaceae Verbena litoralis
Viburnaceae Viburnum lehmannii
Zingiberaceae Hedychium coronarium, Renealmia ligulata
Table A2. Importance Value Index (IVI), Pielou aggregation index (Ga), and spatial-distribution interpretation for the 35 species recorded in the structural sampling (Component II, n = 498 individuals).
Table A2. Importance Value Index (IVI), Pielou aggregation index (Ga), and spatial-distribution interpretation for the 35 species recorded in the structural sampling (Component II, n = 498 individuals).
Species IVI Ga Interpretation
Aiouea montana 17.50 2.43 Clustered
Alchornea latifolia 5.18 1.53 Tends to cluster
Banara guianensis 1.86 0.04 Dispersed
Cecropia angustifolia 2.96 0.90 Dispersed
Cinchona pubescens 4.59 0.87 Dispersed
Citrus reticulata 1.48 0.90 Dispersed
Coffea arabica 9.15 0.90 Dispersed
Costus laevis 1.48 0.90 Dispersed
Geonoma pinnatifrons 19.35 2.82 Clustered
Hedyosmum bonplandianum 5.46 0.90 Dispersed
Heliconia griggsiana 19.60 0.17 Dispersed
Inga densiflora 4.39 0.09 Dispersed
Lacistema aggregatum 22.18 2.48 Clustered
Miconia notabilis 5.77 2.18 Clustered
Miconia octona 3.16 1.17 Tends to cluster
Miconia theaezans 1.71 0.90 Dispersed
Myrcia popayanensis 3.15 1.17 Tends to cluster
Myrcianthes hallii 1.50 0.90 Dispersed
Myrsine coriacea 12.36 0.78 Dispersed
Myrsine guianensis 17.31 2.36 Clustered
Nectandra acutifolia 3.92 1.96 Tends to cluster
Nectandra mollis 2.45 0.90 Dispersed
Ocotea oblonga 2.68 0.90 Dispersed
Olmedia aspera 17.85 15.28 Clustered
Oreopanax bogotensis 5.20 0.65 Dispersed
Palicourea angustifolia 3.25 1.17 Tends to cluster
Palicourea crocea 45.12 3.60 Clustered
Palicourea heterochroma 2.09 1.79 Tends to cluster
Palicourea thyrsiflora 17.51 2.43 Clustered
Piper crassinervium 3.67 0.90 Dispersed
Piper hartwegianum 10.95 0.09 Dispersed
Piper hispidum 11.41 0.74 Dispersed
Quercus humboldtii 6.52 0.13 Dispersed
Syzygium jambos 5.76 2.18 Clustered
Toxicodendron striatum 1.46 0.90 Dispersed

References

  1. Alvarado-Reyes, A.J.; Rosero-Lasprilla, L.; Jara-Muñoz, O.A. Floristic composition and structure of an Andean forest remnant in the eastern slope of the Colombian Andes. Biota Colombiana 2024, 25, e1202. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvear, M.; Betancur, J.; Franco-Rosselli, P. Floristic composition and structure of a sub-Andean forest in the Cauca Department, Colombia. Caldasia 2010, 32, 39–63. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anzoátegui, L.V.; Gil-Leguizamón, P.A.; Sanabria-Marín, R. Plant diversity and structure of an Andean secondary forest in advanced passive restoration. Bosque 2023, 44, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. IDEAM; MADS. Actualización cifras de monitoreo de la superficie de bosque — 2024. IDEAM: Bogotá, Colombia, 2025.
  5. IDEAM. Tasa anual de deforestación según Departamento 1990–2024. IDEAM: Bogotá, Colombia, 2025.
  6. Armenteras, D.; Rodríguez, N. Forest fragmentation and biodiversity loss in the Colombian Andes. Colomb. For. 2014, 17, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Galindo, T.; Betancur, J.; Cadena, J. Floristic composition of an Andean forest in the Central Cordillera of Colombia. Caldasia 2003, 25, 313–335. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ariza, W.; Toro, J.L.; Medina, A. Estructura y composición florística de un bosque andino en el suroccidente colombiano. Colomb. For. 2009, 12, 81–102. [Google Scholar]
  9. Trujillo, W.F.; Henao, M.M. Composición y estructura del componente arbóreo en un bosque subandino del departamento de Caldas. Colomb. For. 2018, 21, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Franco-Rosselli, P.; Betancur, J.; Fernández-Alonso, J.L. Plant diversity in Colombian Andean forests. Caldasia 1997, 19, 205–234. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sanín, D.; Duque, C.A. Floristic and structural characterization of a sub-Andean forest fragment in Cauca, Colombia. Bol. Cient. Cent. Museos 2006, 10, 45–75. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rangel, J.O.; Lozano, G. Un perfil de vegetación entre Puracé y el Volcán Nevado del Huila. Caldasia 1986, 14, 503–547. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vallejo-Mayo, L.Y.; Rivera-Díaz, O. Composición y estructura de un fragmento de bosque andino en Santander de Quilichao, Cauca. Caldasia 2022, 44, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. López-Vargas, L.E.; et al. Diversidad florística y estructural de un bosque subandino fragmentado en Timbío (Cauca, Colombia). Luna Azul 2015, 41, 131–151. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bolaños, G.Y.; et al. Sucesión secundaria en bosques andinos: dinámica de regeneración y composición florística. Bol. Cient. Mus. Hist. Nat. 2010, 14, 19–38. [Google Scholar]
  16. Segura-Madrigal, M.A.; Andrade, H.J.; Sierra, E. Aboveground biomass and carbon storage in Andean secondary forests of Colombia. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2020, 68, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  17. Aragón, S.; et al. Aboveground biomass accumulation along secondary succession gradients in tropical montane forests of South America. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 28, e01696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ojoatre, S.; et al. Carbon storage and recovery dynamics in tropical secondary forests: a global meta-analysis. For. Ecol. Manag. 2024, 552, 121569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Herazo-Vitola, F.; et al. Estructura vertical y composición florística de un bosque andino en proceso de restauración pasiva en Colombia. Acta Bot. Mex. 2021, 128, e1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Holguín-Estrada, V.A.; et al. Allometric heterogeneity and architectural complexity in Neotropical secondary forests. Polibotánica 2021, 51, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mueller-Dombois, D.; Ellenberg, H. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology; Wiley: New York, USA, 1974; ISBN 978-0-471-62290-2. [Google Scholar]
  22. Montes-de-Oca-Cano, E.; et al. Carbon storage in tropical secondary forests of Colombia: implications for climate change mitigation. Colomb. For. 2020, 23, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Murcia, C.; et al. Restauración de bosques andinos: avances, desafíos y perspectivas; CIFOR Documentos Ocasionales 170; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Beugnon, R.; et al. Tree species spatial heterogeneity enhances long-term carbon-storage stability in tropical forests. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 61389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qiao, X.; et al. Spatial aggregation patterns and carbon-stock stability in subtropical forests: a modelling approach. Ecol. Modell. 2023, 475, 110689. [Google Scholar]
  26. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000; FAO Forestry Paper 140; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. IPCC. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. In Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chave, J.; et al. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob. Change Biol. 2014, 20, 3177–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rodríguez-Lombana, A.R.; et al. Floristic patterns of Andean tropical forests in northwestern Colombia. Biota Colomb. 2017, 18, 43–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Freund, C.A.; et al. Microclimate and structural drivers of vascular epiphyte diversity in Andean forests. Front. For. Glob. Change 2023, 6, 1091387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gentry, A.H.; Dodson, C.H. Diversity and biogeography of Neotropical vascular epiphytes. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1987, 74, 205–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ogawa, H.; Yoda, K.; Ogino, K.; Kira, T. Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. Nat. Life Southeast Asia 1965, 4, 13–80. [Google Scholar]
  33. Scott, D.W. On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika 1979, 66, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pretzsch, H. Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield: From Measurement to Model; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2009; ISBN 978-3-540-88306-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hsieh, T.C.; Ma, K.H.; Chao, A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7, 1451–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. 36.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, version 4.3.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2023; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 15 March 2025).
  37. Oksanen, J.; Simpson, G.L.; Blanchet, F.G.; et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package, R Package version 2.6-4. 2022. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 15 March 2025).
  38. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, USA, 2023; ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wickham, H.; François, R.; Henry, L.; Müller, K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation, R Package version 1.1.2. 2023. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr (accessed on 15 March 2025).
  40. World Flora Online Consortium. World Flora Online. Available online: https://www.worldfloraonline.org/ (accessed on 30 June 2025).
Figure 1. Geographic location of the El Mangón sub-Andean forest remnant in the corregimiento of Tunía, municipality of Piendamó, department of Cauca, southwestern Colombia (1,600–1,700 m a.s.l., 24 ha). Inset shows the position of the department of Cauca within Colombia.
Figure 1. Geographic location of the El Mangón sub-Andean forest remnant in the corregimiento of Tunía, municipality of Piendamó, department of Cauca, southwestern Colombia (1,600–1,700 m a.s.l., 24 ha). Inset shows the position of the department of Cauca within Colombia.
Preprints 212199 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of alpha diversity indices computed for the El Mangón forest remnant (Component II; n = 498 individuals; 35 species). Bars show normalized values (0–1) for visual comparison; numerical labels above each bar indicate the original index values. Shannon–Wiener (H′) = 2.553; Simpson (1−D) = 0.893; Pielou (J′) = 0.718; Margalef (DMg) = 5.475. Color codes: green = high level; orange = medium level.
Figure 2. Comparison of alpha diversity indices computed for the El Mangón forest remnant (Component II; n = 498 individuals; 35 species). Bars show normalized values (0–1) for visual comparison; numerical labels above each bar indicate the original index values. Shannon–Wiener (H′) = 2.553; Simpson (1−D) = 0.893; Pielou (J′) = 0.718; Margalef (DMg) = 5.475. Color codes: green = high level; orange = medium level.
Preprints 212199 g002
Figure 3. Individual-based rarefaction curves for the five 50 × 4 m transects sampled in the El Mangón remnant, standardized to n = 52 individuals (smallest transect size; vertical dashed line). Each curve represents the expected species richness as a function of the number of sampled individuals.
Figure 3. Individual-based rarefaction curves for the five 50 × 4 m transects sampled in the El Mangón remnant, standardized to n = 52 individuals (smallest transect size; vertical dashed line). Each curve represents the expected species richness as a function of the number of sampled individuals.
Preprints 212199 g003
Figure 4. Rarefaction (solid lines) and extrapolation (dashed lines) curves of Hill numbers (q = 0, q = 1, q = 2) for the five 50 × 4 m transects of the El Mangón remnant. q = 0: species richness; q = 1: exponential of Shannon entropy; q = 2: inverse Simpson concentration. Shaded bands represent 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (999 iterations). iNEXT package [35] in R v4.3.0 [36].
Figure 4. Rarefaction (solid lines) and extrapolation (dashed lines) curves of Hill numbers (q = 0, q = 1, q = 2) for the five 50 × 4 m transects of the El Mangón remnant. q = 0: species richness; q = 1: exponential of Shannon entropy; q = 2: inverse Simpson concentration. Shaded bands represent 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (999 iterations). iNEXT package [35] in R v4.3.0 [36].
Preprints 212199 g004
Figure 5. Importance Value Index (IVI) of the fifteen most ecologically dominant species in the El Mangón forest remnant (Component II; n = 498 individuals; 35 species). Stacked bars decompose the index into its three components: relative abundance, relative frequency, and relative dominance. IVI theoretical maximum = 300. P. crocea leads the assemblage (IVI = 45.12), followed by L. aggregatum and H. griggsiana.
Figure 5. Importance Value Index (IVI) of the fifteen most ecologically dominant species in the El Mangón forest remnant (Component II; n = 498 individuals; 35 species). Stacked bars decompose the index into its three components: relative abundance, relative frequency, and relative dominance. IVI theoretical maximum = 300. P. crocea leads the assemblage (IVI = 45.12), followed by L. aggregatum and H. griggsiana.
Preprints 212199 g005
Figure 6. Box plots of diameter at breast height (DBH, cm) for the 35 species recorded in the structural sampling (Component II; n = 498 individuals). Species are ordered from largest to smallest median DBH. Boxes show the interquartile range; horizontal lines denote the median; whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR; points indicate outliers. M. hallii, M. popayanensis, and P. heterochroma show the largest median DBH; small-stemmed species cluster on the right of the panel.
Figure 6. Box plots of diameter at breast height (DBH, cm) for the 35 species recorded in the structural sampling (Component II; n = 498 individuals). Species are ordered from largest to smallest median DBH. Boxes show the interquartile range; horizontal lines denote the median; whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR; points indicate outliers. M. hallii, M. popayanensis, and P. heterochroma show the largest median DBH; small-stemmed species cluster on the right of the panel.
Preprints 212199 g006
Figure 7. Ogawa diagram with linear regression for the El Mangón forest remnant (n = 498 individuals; R² = 0.506). Total height (Ht, m) is plotted against stem height (Hf, m). Solid blue line: linear regression; shaded band: 95% confidence interval; dashed red line: 1:1 reference line. The diagram reveals an asymmetric height distribution with strong concentration of individuals in lower and intermediate classes.
Figure 7. Ogawa diagram with linear regression for the El Mangón forest remnant (n = 498 individuals; R² = 0.506). Total height (Ht, m) is plotted against stem height (Hf, m). Solid blue line: linear regression; shaded band: 95% confidence interval; dashed red line: 1:1 reference line. The diagram reveals an asymmetric height distribution with strong concentration of individuals in lower and intermediate classes.
Preprints 212199 g007
Figure 8. Box plots of total height (Ht, m) by species recorded in the structural sampling of El Mangón (Component II; n = 498 individuals). Species are ordered from largest to smallest median height. Boxes show the interquartile range; horizontal lines denote the median; whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR; points indicate outliers. The figure highlights the architectural heterogeneity expected in secondary forests with high diversity of growth forms.
Figure 8. Box plots of total height (Ht, m) by species recorded in the structural sampling of El Mangón (Component II; n = 498 individuals). Species are ordered from largest to smallest median height. Boxes show the interquartile range; horizontal lines denote the median; whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR; points indicate outliers. The figure highlights the architectural heterogeneity expected in secondary forests with high diversity of growth forms.
Preprints 212199 g008
Figure 9. Carbon Valuation Index (CVI) of the most relevant species in the El Mangón remnant (Component II), calculated according to Equation (12). P. crocea dominates the index (CVI = 14.08), followed by H. griggsiana (3.69) and M. guianensis (1.63). Numerical labels indicate the CVI value of each species.
Figure 9. Carbon Valuation Index (CVI) of the most relevant species in the El Mangón remnant (Component II), calculated according to Equation (12). P. crocea dominates the index (CVI = 14.08), followed by H. griggsiana (3.69) and M. guianensis (1.63). Numerical labels indicate the CVI value of each species.
Preprints 212199 g009
Figure 10. Carbon Capture Efficiency Index (CCEI = Carbon / (IVI × Density)) of the species with the highest values in the El Mangón remnant, calculated according to Equation (13). C. arabica leads the index (CCEI = 12.46), followed by M. coriacea and O. oblonga; the high value of C. arabica reflects physiological characteristics of an introduced species rather than a native ecological function (see in-text note in Section 3.5).
Figure 10. Carbon Capture Efficiency Index (CCEI = Carbon / (IVI × Density)) of the species with the highest values in the El Mangón remnant, calculated according to Equation (13). C. arabica leads the index (CCEI = 12.46), followed by M. coriacea and O. oblonga; the high value of C. arabica reflects physiological characteristics of an introduced species rather than a native ecological function (see in-text note in Section 3.5).
Preprints 212199 g010
Figure 11. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot of structural and functional variables for the species recorded in Component II. PC1 = 64.6% of variance; PC2 = 26.3% (cumulative = 90.9%). Variables include IVI, density, relative abundance, relative dominance, biomass, and carbon storage (standardized; mean = 0, SD = 1). Coloured ellipses indicate the four functional groups identified by hierarchical clustering (Ward, Euclidean distance).
Figure 11. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot of structural and functional variables for the species recorded in Component II. PC1 = 64.6% of variance; PC2 = 26.3% (cumulative = 90.9%). Variables include IVI, density, relative abundance, relative dominance, biomass, and carbon storage (standardized; mean = 0, SD = 1). Coloured ellipses indicate the four functional groups identified by hierarchical clustering (Ward, Euclidean distance).
Preprints 212199 g011
Figure 12. Carbon Sustainability Index (CSI) according to spatial-pattern group in the El Mangón remnant. Boxes show the distribution of individual species CSI values for three groups: aggregated / grouped (Ga > 2; 9 spp.), dispersed / low aggregation (Ga < 1; 20 spp.), and species with tendency toward grouping (1 ≤ Ga ≤ 2). Boxes show interquartile range; horizontal lines indicate the median; whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR; points are outliers. Differences among groups were not statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis, p = 0.088).
Figure 12. Carbon Sustainability Index (CSI) according to spatial-pattern group in the El Mangón remnant. Boxes show the distribution of individual species CSI values for three groups: aggregated / grouped (Ga > 2; 9 spp.), dispersed / low aggregation (Ga < 1; 20 spp.), and species with tendency toward grouping (1 ≤ Ga ≤ 2). Boxes show interquartile range; horizontal lines indicate the median; whiskers extend to 1.5 × IQR; points are outliers. Differences among groups were not statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis, p = 0.088).
Preprints 212199 g012
Table 1. Spatial factor (Fspatial) applied in the calculation of the Carbon Sustainability Index (CSI) according to the Pielou aggregation index (Ga).
Table 1. Spatial factor (Fspatial) applied in the calculation of the Carbon Sustainability Index (CSI) according to the Pielou aggregation index (Ga).
Distribution pattern (Ga) Fspatial Criterion
Low aggregation (Ga < 1) 1.00 Dispersed / regular distribution
Tendency toward clumping (1 ≤ Ga ≤ 2) 0.75 Intermediate pattern
Aggregated (Ga > 2) 0.50 Aggregated pattern
Other cases 0.75 Default value
Table 2. Ten most diverse plant families recorded in the El Mangón sub-Andean forest remnant (Component I, free floristic inventory across 24 ha). Total richness = 281 species in 99 families.
Table 2. Ten most diverse plant families recorded in the El Mangón sub-Andean forest remnant (Component I, free floristic inventory across 24 ha). Total richness = 281 species in 99 families.
Family Species % of total
Poaceae 20 7.12
Asteraceae 13 4.63
Orchidaceae 13 4.63
Polypodiaceae 10 3.56
Rubiaceae 10 3.56
Piperaceae 9 3.20
Fabaceae 8 2.85
Melastomataceae 8 2.85
Bromeliaceae 7 2.49
Bryaceae 7 2.49
Subtotal (10 most diverse families) 105 37.40
Total 281 100.00
Table 3. Observed, rarefied (n = 52), and asymptotically estimated richness (Hill numbers, q = 0) by transect. Relative completeness = observed S / estimated asymptotic S. Analysis with iNEXT [35] in R v4.3.0 [36].
Table 3. Observed, rarefied (n = 52), and asymptotically estimated richness (Hill numbers, q = 0) by transect. Relative completeness = observed S / estimated asymptotic S. Analysis with iNEXT [35] in R v4.3.0 [36].
Transect N S obs. S raref. (n = 52) SE S asympt. 95% CI Complet.
Transect 1 52 15 15.00 0.000 30.7 15.0–64.4 ≈49%
Transect 2 124 15 10.85 1.348 32.9 15.0–58.7 ≈46%
Transect 3 112 18 13.46 1.511 20.1 18.0–34.1 ≈90%
Transect 4 107 14 11.31 1.185 21.9 14.0–39.0 ≈64%
Transect 5 100 17 13.11 1.398 29.1 17.0–53.0 ≈58%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated

Accessibility

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings