Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Morphometric and Multivariate Analysis of Geomorphological and Multi-Hazard Dynamics in the La Sabana River Basin, Acapulco – Mexico

A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in:
Water 2026, 18(11), 1324. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18111324

Submitted:

29 April 2026

Posted:

01 May 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Coastal basins are highly dynamic systems susceptible to flooding and erosion, processes intensified by extreme cyclonic events. This study aims to develop a physical-geographic framework for analyzing the multi-hazard geomorphological dynamics of the La Sabana River basin in southern Mexico. The methodology integrates the analysis of the basin's natural and anthropogenic components with morphometric evaluation and multivariate analysis (PCA) at the sub-basin level. The results show a highly efficient drainage network (3.8-5.4 km/km²) and short concentration times (0.98–2.75), which favor a rapid hydrological response and high susceptibility to flooding and erosion. PCA explained 65.8% of the total variance, identifying basin size, drainage organization, and system shape as dominant controls. Critical sub-basins with rapid hydrological response (Tc ≤ 1.5 h) were identified, coinciding with areas of high anthropogenic exposure. It is concluded that integrating morphometric indices through multivariate approaches provides a robust, replicable basis for risk governance and territorial planning in coastal basins.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Coastal zones are among the most dynamic and hazardous territorial contexts on the planet due to the continuous interaction of oceanic, atmospheric, geological, and biological processes at the Earth's edge. [1,2]. These transitional systems concentrate dense human populations, critical infrastructure, and high-value economic activities, making them particularly exposed to multiple threats triggered by hydrometeorological events. [3,4]. In tropical regions, the recurrence of cyclones, heavy rainfall, and extreme events significantly increases the frequency and severity of floods and erosion, generating increasingly complex, interconnected multi-hazard risk scenarios.[5].
This situation is exacerbated by unplanned urban expansion, for example, through the occupation of floodplains and unstable slopes, as well as the transformation of natural systems that regulate hydrological and geomorphological behavior [6,7]. Global evidence confirms that human settlements have expanded rapidly into flood-prone areas in coastal regions since the 1950s; this trend substantially increases communities' exposure to hydrometeorological hazards [8].
In this context, coastal risk governance has emerged as a central axis for territorial planning and sustainable development, requiring integrated approaches that link scientific knowledge with decision-making [9,10]. However, the physical-geographical knowledge of coastal systems is still only partially incorporated into operational risk governance instruments. Although geomorphological and hydrological studies of coastal basins have advanced significantly, their integration into territorial planning and adaptive risk management frameworks remains insufficient [11,12].
Moving in this direction requires tools that can translate physiographic knowledge of the territory into useful information for decision-making. In this context, morphometric analysis of watersheds has become an established and effective approach for describing the organization of relief, drainage structure, and hydrological response to extreme events [13,14]. Morphometric indicators enable the quantitative characterization of watershed hydrological behavior and the assessment of their susceptibility to hazards such as floods and erosion [15,16]. Their effectiveness has been widely supported across diverse physiographic contexts, thereby consolidating them as reference tools for the spatial assessment of hydrogeomorphological risk [17,18]. The integration of these indicators using multivariate techniques, such as principal component analysis (PCA), enables the objective identification of the dominant controls that structure the hydrogeomorphological dynamics of watersheds [19]. Implementing this approach allows for reducing highly correlated morphometric variables into interpretable components associated with drainage density, relief, and basin shape [17]. However, there remains a growing need to develop integrated frameworks that link physical-geographic analysis to multi-hazard risk management, particularly in tropical basins, where interactions between natural processes and anthropogenic dynamics create complex scenarios of exposure and vulnerability [20,21].
The La Sabana River basin, located in the southern Pacific coastal region of Mexico, represents an emblematic case of this problem. Land-use changes associated with urban growth have been identified as primary drivers of increased flood risk in Mexican coastal basins, reducing infiltration capacity and accelerating surface runoff, even under stable precipitation regimes [7].
This dynamic is particularly pronounced in Acapulco, a municipality that has been affected by extreme hydrometeorological events, the severity of which has been amplified by the area's geomorphological and urban conditions. Events such as Hurricane Paulina (1997), Tropical Storm Manuel (2013), Hurricane Otis (2023), the most intense recorded in the Mexican Pacific, and Hurricane John (2024) have highlighted the structural vulnerabilities of the region, where extreme rainfall, urbanization in susceptible areas, and environmental degradation have amplified the impacts of each phenomenon.
Studies of these events have documented severe failures in early warning systems, crisis coordination, and risk communication [22,23], as well as extensive erosion, flooding, and infrastructure damage in the basin's tourist and residential areas [22]. These findings highlight the limitations of existing risk governance frameworks, demonstrating persistent shortcomings in understanding the territory and considering the basin's physical-geographic conditions in risk management and preventive planning processes.
Given this scenario, the present study aims to develop an integrated physical-geographic framework to strengthen multi-hazard risk governance associated with tropical storms in coastal basins. To this end, it combines the analysis of natural and anthropogenic landscape components, hydrogeomorphological and morphometric characterization, and multivariate techniques. Within this framework, multi-hazard dynamics are approached from a geomorphological perspective, emphasizing the interaction between hydrological processes, such as runoff generation and flood propagation, and slope processes, particularly landslides, under extreme rainfall conditions. Rather than modeling each hazard independently, the study identifies the spatial configuration of basin attributes that jointly enhance susceptibility to coupled hydrogeomorphological responses. This approach makes it possible to identify the dominant controls on hazardous geomorphological dynamics and to support spatially explicit territorial intervention decisions in the La Sabana River basin, southern Mexico.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The La Sabana River basin is in southwestern Mexico, specifically in southern Guerrero. It is delimited by the coordinates 16°42’17’’ north latitude and -99°54’37’’ west longitude, with an area of 740.14 km². The basin's surface area is located primarily within the municipality of Acapulco de Juárez (94.99%), while the western portion encompasses 5.01% of the territory of the municipality of Coyuca de Benítez. It is an exorheic basin, as the main river flows into the Tres Palos Lagoon, which in turn empties into the Pacific Ocean.
Figure 1. Geographic location of the La Sabana River basin in Acapulco, Guerrero – Mexico. Basemap: Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors.
Figure 1. Geographic location of the La Sabana River basin in Acapulco, Guerrero – Mexico. Basemap: Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors.
Preprints 211138 g001

2.2. Methodology

The research design follows a sequential order in three stages. The first stage focuses on describing the basin's physical-geographic environment, including its natural and anthropogenic components. The second stage involves a physiographic characterization of the watershed and the La Sabana River subsystems using morphometric indicators. The final stage is a statistical analysis using principal component analysis (PCA) to integrate the morphometric indicators used in this study. Figure 2 illustrates the methodological sequence used in the study, and it is explained in detail in the following sections.

2.3. Data

The data in this research comes from official geographic sources for Mexico. The physical-geographic analysis was performed using topographic maps in vector format at a scale of 1:50,000 and also with raster data from the DEM corresponding to the Mexican Elevation Continuum 3.0 of the National Institute of Statistics and Geography, with a spatial resolution of 15 m [23]. The processing of spatial data, the calculation of morphometric indicators, and their cartographic representation were performed using QGIS 3.44. However, the R programming language was also used to develop statistical and complementary processing, as well as to represent graphics.

2.4. Analysis of the Physical–Geographical Environment

The physical-geographic analysis of the La Sabana River basin in this study is based on an integrated vision of the territory, in which the interplay between natural processes and anthropogenic dynamics is conceived from a perspective on the society-nature relationship that influences the functioning of a fluvial system [24,25,26].
From a natural perspective, the physical conditions that define the complex interactions among tectonic, climatic, and erosive processes that configure the basin's geomorphological and hydrological dynamics and continually shape and transform the landscape are interpreted [27]. The role of relief energy as a conditioning factor in natural processes is highlighted [28,29,30].
The climatic regime is considered a triggering factor that conditions the basin's hydrological response through its hydrometeorological framework, determined by precipitation and temperature [31,32]. Soil and vegetation development act as an interface in the climate-relief relationship, influencing infiltration, surface runoff, and terrain stability [35,36,37]; while regional lithology and tectonics exert structural controls that shape and influence the evolution of the fluvial system [33,34].
Complementarily, anthropogenic activity has acquired an important role as a forcing factor in the physical-geographic system, interfering with the modification of natural channels, increasing soil impermeability, and altering hydrological connectivity through the expansion of human settlements, infrastructure development, and land-use changes [35]. In this sense, this study explains the anthropic components based on human settlements, population and housing, road infrastructure, and land use in the basin, and they are understood as factors that significantly modify the geomorphological and hydrological functioning, by transforming the natural conditions of the territory and favoring the configuration of spaces potentially exposed to the occurrence of dangerous geomorphological processes.

2.5. l Hydrographic Characterization of the Watershed

This section presents the methodological approach used to characterize the physiographic elements of the La Sabana River hydrographic system and is structured in two stages. The first part focuses on characterizing the drainage network to differentiate the natural boundaries of the river system at the basin and sub-basin levels, followed by a morphometric evaluation at the sub-basin level. The methodological development combined geomorphological criteria and geospatial tools for each stage.

2.5.1. Spatial Organization of the Basin

In watershed studies, hydrographic delineation is the initial step, as it allows identification of the catchment area and the morphological elements that constitute it.
In this stage, two criteria were used to differentiate the hydrographic system. First, topographic data at a 1:50,000 scale were derived from analog maps, providing a preliminary characterization of the drainage network. This was followed by automated hydrological processing in GIS. The integration of both techniques enabled the inclusion of the geomorphological criterion as a control basis during automated processing, ensuring a coherent cartographic base for delineating the boundaries of the river system at the watershed and sub-watershed levels.

2.5.2. Morphometric Evaluation

Morphometric analysis in geomorphology focuses on the quantitative characteristics of topographic relief [36,37]. In watershed studies, the evaluation of morphometric indicators has become a technique that enables understanding of the complexity of the relief through spatially organized patterns, thereby revealing its hydrogeomorphological dynamics [28,38,39,40,41]. The morphometric indicators used in this study were selected from a review by Shekar [44], which compiles morphometric indices from the existing literature. The document presents 32 indicators, of which only 19 were considered in this study because several were found to yield similar results. The indices were categorized into three classes: a) Watershed geometry, b) Drainage network, and c) Topographic relief (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).
The process of extracting these values was developed in GIS, and they were calculated using the mathematical equation for each indicator, based on the DEM and the polygons that define the basin and sub-basin surfaces.
a)
Basin Geometry
The morphometric indicators associated with basin geometry provided important information for understanding the hydrological and dynamic processes occurring within them [42,43].
  • b) Drainage network
The indicators associated with the drainage network enabled the description of hydrological connectivity and the efficiency with which runoff is channeled into the river system (Table 2). Their analysis proves to be an excellent indicator for recognizing drainage patterns influenced by structural control [46]. They have also been used to predict geomorphological dynamics, such as flooding, and to estimate erosion rates [15,47]. Studies have confirmed that the hierarchical structure of the drainage network reflects the interaction between lithological composition and sites susceptible to precipitation-triggered erosional dynamics [48,49].
  • c) Topographic Relief
Relief parameters, derived from the relationship among area, height, and relief, were essential for assessing the degree of relief dissection and the evolutionary state of a watershed [50,51]. From a geomorphological perspective, indicators of topographic relief are essential for understanding the morphological organization of the river system [52].
Based on the morphometric indices described above, the time of concentration (Tc) was calculated to characterize the hydrological response.
  • d) Time of Concentration (Tc)
Its calculation focuses on the time required for water to travel from the farthest point in a basin to the basin's outlet in the river system [53]. In this study, Tc was calculated using Giandotti [54] due to its widespread use in hydrological studies and the specific characteristics of the basin under study.
T c = 4 A + 1.5 L 0.8 H
Tc = Time of concentration (hrs)
A = Basin area (km²)
L = Length of main channel (km)
H = Elevation difference between the headwaters and the basin outlet (m)
  • e) Hypsometric integral (Hi)
This parameter enables evaluation of the degree of dissection and the evolutionary state of the basin's relief. Its value allows for inferences about the relative states of youth, maturity, or old age of the relief, providing an interpretative framework for the basin's erosive dynamics [50,52].
In this work, the hypsometric integral for each basin was calculated according to the method proposed by Pike and Wilson [54], as the (E) Elevation-Relief ratio expressed as:
E H S i = H H m i n H m a x H m i n
E = Elevation-relief relationship equivalent to the hypsometric integral His.
H = Average elevation of the basin, estimated from the contour lines.
Hmax and Hmin elevations = Minimum and maximum elevations of the sub-basins.

2.6. Multivariate Principal Component Analysis

Morphometric indicators of watersheds are often correlated, suggesting that some of the information contained in one variable is also present in others [19]. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a multivariate analysis technique that treats two or more related random variables as a single entity and seeks to produce a global result by accounting for their relationships [55,56].
In this study, PCA was used to analyze the morphometric indicators calculated for the La Sabana River sub-basins. The procedure consisted of evaluating the correlation structure between the morphometric indicators using a Pearson correlation matrix to identify collinearities among the variables. Based on this preliminary evaluation, PCA was performed in R using the FactoMineR package.
The principal components were selected based on the cumulative explained variance and the scree plot. The interpretation of the morphometric indices focused on analyzing factor loadings, the relative contributions of the variables, and cos², thereby allowing the identification of the dominant morphometric gradients of the basin system.

3. Results

3.1. Components of the Natural Environment

This section analyzes the natural environmental components of the La Sabana River basin to understand the physical controls that regulate the geomorphological and hydrological dynamics within the river system. The study integrates relief, climate, soils, vegetation, and the basin's geological and tectonic framework, which are understood to interact in an articulated manner to generate and develop geomorphological processes. The components of the natural landscape are shown spatially in Figure 3.

3.1.1. Relief

The maximum altitude of the basin is 2,262 meters above sea level (masl), the lowest is 0 masl, and the average altitude is around 327 masl. The hydrographic system is located in the Southwestern Region on the Pacific coast [57]. It belongs to the Sierra Madre del Sur and, in turn, to the subprovinces of the southern coastal mountain range and the southern coastal plain. This mountain system is characterized as a complex system composed of varied lithology, including intrusive, volcanic, sedimentary, and metamorphic rocks. The ages of the rocks range from the Precambrian to the Neogene, and their lithological units are organized by tectonic structures: folds and a system of faults and fractures [58].
In the upper reaches of the Sabana River basin, medium- and low-elevation mountains, characterized by abrupt relief from regional tectonic activity, are the primary areas where erosion occurs.
The basin's territory is surrounded by the Timuchal and Veladero mountain ranges, which border the southwestern sector, adjacent to the bay of Puerto Marques. The middle and lower parts of the basin are represented by an alluvial plain formed by Quaternary deposits and delimited by mountain massifs composed of granite and granodiorite; the Tres Palos Lagoon is a prominent feature of the coastal area.

3.1.2. Climate

The climate regime of the La Sabana River basin is strongly influenced by its location on the South Pacific slope and tropical atmospheric dynamics, characterized by the marked seasonality of summer rains, the incidence of tropical waves and cyclones, and the altitudinal gradient that ranges from the coastal plain to the highest elevations, from sea level to 2200 meters above sea level.
According to the Köppen climate classification [59], modified for Mexico by García [60], the basin is predominantly characterized by warm subhumid climates (Aw) with variations reflecting humidity gradients and/or orographic control dominated by the Sierra Madre del Sur mountain range. The Aw0 subtype predominates on the coastal plain, characterized by average annual temperatures above 22°C and minimum temperatures of 18°C, with a P/T index for summer rainfall below 43.2. The Aw1 subclimate is also present, where the P/T index ranges from 42.2 to 55.3. The Aw2 subtype is identified as the more humid areas of the basin with a P/T index greater than 55.3.
In the higher portions of the basin (>1000 m above sea level), primarily in the northwestern sector, the semi-warm subhumid climate (A)C(w2) predominates, with temperatures above 18°C and rainfall of 40 mm in the driest month.

3.1.3. Soil

The La Sabana River basin exhibits high soil diversity, resulting from interactions among topography, fluvial dynamics, lithology, and climatic conditions across the upper reaches to the coastal zone. Soil distribution reflects a clear geomorphological gradient, with young, poorly developed soils predominating in areas of high-energy topography, and more developed soils on relatively stable or depositional surfaces.
The basin primarily contains Regosols, Leptosols, Cambisols, Phaeozems, Luvisols, Fluvisols, Arenosols, and Solonchaks, as well as localized areas of urban soils in the lower basin [61]. Regosols are the most extensive (430 km²), located on slopes and unstable surfaces within the basin, and exhibit limited horizon development with visible parent material at the surface. Leptosols (41.66 km²) are poorly developed soils in the basin, located on rocky outcrops and characterized by a rapid hydrological response. Luvisols (31.03 km²) are associated with areas of fine material accumulation and exhibit good infiltration and moisture retention. Arenosols (45.23 km²) are distributed along the coastal strip and areas near the mouth of the La Sabana River, where loose sands predominate with rapid infiltration and water retention. Solonchaks (13.09 km²) are found on the margin of the Tres Palos Lagoon and are characterized by surface salinity and poor drainage. Finally, Phaeozems (86.18 km²) are located on relatively stable surfaces and are notable for their organic matter content and good infiltration. This soil configuration has direct implications for infiltration, surface runoff, slope stability, and susceptibility to flooding, key aspects for interpreting subsequent geomorphological and hydrological analyses.

3.1.4. Vegetation

The vegetation of the La Sabana River basin exhibits a heterogeneous spatial distribution, primarily controlled by varying altitudinal gradients, the climatic regime, and the geomorphological dynamics of the river system [61]. In the higher elevation areas, characterized by mountainous terrain and moderate to steep slopes, pine, oak, and mixed forest formations predominate. These types of tree cover naturally contribute to soil conservation and protection, the regulation of surface runoff, and slope stability [62,63].
In the middle-to-upper sections of the basin, deciduous forest is dominant, with isolated areas of semi-deciduous and semi-evergreen medium-height forests. These communities reflect seasonal climatic conditions and play a moderate role in hydrological regulation, generating greater runoff during heavy rainfall events due to seasonal foliage loss [64,65].
The natural vegetation has been extensively transformed into the lower and coastal parts of the basin by agricultural uses, induced pastures, and urban areas, especially on alluvial plains and in sectors near the main channel. The presence of mangroves along the margins of the Tres Palos lagoon and at the mouth of the La Sabana River towards the Pacific is noteworthy; these ecosystems naturally act as nature-based solutions to natural hazards such as floods, tsunamis, and storm surges [66,67,68,69].

3.1.5. Regional Lithological and Tectonic Synthesis: Sierra Madre del Sur

The Sierra Madre del Sur is one of the most complex geological provinces in Mexico. It extends across the states of Colima, Jalisco, Michoacán, Guerrero, and Oaxaca, forming the watershed between the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific slopes. Its current configuration results from the interaction and accretion of various tectonostratigraphic terranes during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic eras, within the context of the subduction of the Cocos Plate beneath the North American Plate [70,71].
Among the main terranes that make up the Sierra Madre del Sur are the Mixteco, Guerrero, and Xolapa, whose lithological and structural diversity demonstrates the province's character as a tectonostratigraphic mosaic with a highly complex paleogeographic evolution. The Mixteco terrane is also represented by the Acatlán Complex, a Paleozoic metamorphic basement composed of sequences of slates, migmatites, and ophiolites, whose deformational history records multiple phases of regional metamorphism [72]. The Guerrero terrane comprises Jurassic-Cretaceous sedimentary and volcanic sequences interpreted as fragments of an intraoceanic arc that accreted to the continental margin [73,74]. For its part, the Xolapa or Chatino terrane is defined as a high-grade plutonometamorphic belt that dominates the coastal strip of Guerrero and Oaxaca and constitutes the geological base of the Acapulco area [75,76].

3.1.6. Local Geology of the Sabana River Basin: The Xolapa Complex in Acapulco

The municipality of Acapulco sits atop the Xolapa Complex, a high-grade metamorphic core that forms the regional basement. This complex is composed primarily of granitic and granodioritic orthogneisses, psammitic-pelitic paragneisses, interbedded marbles, and migmatites, all affected by ductile deformation and amphibolite-facies metamorphism [77,78]. The most representative structures include foliations, lineations, and folds with orientations parallel to the coastline, reflecting the influence of regional tectonics on the local configuration [79].
The tectonothermal history of the Xolapa Complex in Acapulco records at least three phases of ductile deformation with associated foliations and folds, in addition to penetrative migmatization linked to the S2 foliation [80]. Chronologically, Precambrian ages are recognized, linked to the protolith of the paragneisses [81], an Early Jurassic magmatic event (~179 Ma), Early Cretaceous migmatization (~134 Ma), and thermal reactivations in the Late Cretaceous and Paleogene (~61 Ma) [76,77]. These events were followed by the intrusion of syntectonic granites (~129 Ma) and post-Laramide plutons (~55–25 Ma), which complete the magmatic evolution of the complex [81,82]. Taken together, these ages confirm that the Xolapa corresponds to a Jurassic magmatic arc accreted to the continental margin and subsequently reactivated by successive tectonic processes.
Lithologically, the Acapulco amphitheater is developed on the so-called Acapulco Trunk, a medium- to coarse-grained granitic body with porphyritic textures and phaneritic structure, whose age has been assigned from the Late Cretaceous to the Oligocene, depending on the methodology used [83].

3.2. Components of the Anthropogenic Environment

This section analyzes the main components of the anthropogenic environment of the La Sabana River basin to understand their role in transforming the basin into a territorial unit. Based on an analysis of human settlements, population, housing, and urban expansion over time, as well as road infrastructure and land use patterns, this study examines how these interventions have altered hydrological connectivity and created conditions conducive to hazardous geomorphological dynamics. The components of the natural landscape are shown spatially in Figure 4.

3.2.1. Human Settlements, Population, and Housing

Within the basin, 31 localities are identified, of which 24 are rural settlements, and 7 are urban localities [84,85]. The total number of dwellings is approximately 160,969, with an estimated population of 344,536 inhabitants. The total population represents 46.95% of the municipality of Acapulco and 9.73% of the state of Guerrero [86].
In this context, Acapulco's urban growth shows a clear trend throughout 1984–2021, with a sustained increase in the urbanized area, which grew from 13.74 km² in 1984 to 171.63 km² in 2021. This behavior demonstrates accelerated urban expansion, particularly notable between 1984 and 2004, when the greatest increase in urbanized areas was recorded. From 2008 onward, although growth continued, a relative deceleration in the rate of expansion was observed, suggesting a gradual transition toward urban consolidation rather than strictly extensive expansion. However, the cumulative increase reflects a significant territorial transformation, with direct effects on land use, pressure on natural resources, and the geomorphological dynamics of the basin.
Human settlements tend to be located on alluvial plains, in specific areas near the main La Sabana channel, and on slopes with moderate gradients. However, there is a clear increase in housing land use on steep slopes and near ravines. This spatial configuration increases the population's exposure to hydrometeorological events such as river flooding and flash floods caused by mudflows.

3.2.2. Road Infrastructure

Within the basin, there is an existing strategic road infrastructure with significant regional and national connectivity. Notable among these are Federal Highway 95 and its toll variant, the Autopista del Sol (95D), which connects the country's interior to the port of Acapulco, as well as Federal Highway 200, which links the Pacific coastal corridor [87].
Among others, the development of underground road infrastructure stands out, including the Maxitúnel and the Macrotúnel (Acapulco Diamond Zone), which connect to the airport and residential areas, serving as an axis that reinforces the basin's urban and tourist connectivity.
The internal road network comprises an estimated 1,602.45 linear km of paved streets [84,85]. Despite being important for the socio-economic development of the region and bringing benefits to the population in terms of quality of life and community development, there are also environmental repercussions, including soil impermeability and altered runoff, leading to a faster hydrological response during intense precipitation events.

3.2.3. Land Use and Territorial Occupation

The land use characteristics in the basin include agricultural and urban land, with infrastructure projects intended for housing and tourism. According to the Acapulco Metropolitan Area Urban Master Plan [88] and the land use classification [64], the basin designates areas for residential, tourism, agricultural, environmental conservation, and urban infrastructure uses. In the case of Acapulco Diamante, the predominant sector with a high socioeconomic impact on the basin, technical standards stipulate that 71% of the territory is designated for environmental conservation and agricultural productivity, while the remainder should be allocated to tourism, commercial, and residential uses.
However, the presence of residential settlements in areas not designated for such use is evident, leading to the construction of homes on unstable slopes unsuitable for development [89] and in protected natural areas [90]. The Acapulco Master Plan [88] highlights cases such as irregular settlements in Valle de la Sabana, Renacimiento, or Pie de la Cuesta, where the occupation of the territory does not align with the permitted land use, thereby generating socio-environmental risks.

3.2.4. Administrative and Hydrological Framework

According to CONAGUA [91], the La Sabana River basin belongs to the Pacific South administrative region and is part of the Costa Grande de Guerrero hydrological region. This affiliation is relevant for water resource management and territorial planning of the basin, as it defines the institutional frameworks under which basin management policies, flood control, and land-use planning are implemented [92].

3.3. Hydrographic Configuration of the La Sabana River System

The La Sabana River basin is in the tropical zone of the southwestern coastal region of the Mexican Pacific. Its boundaries, defined at a scale of 1:50,000, constitute a perimeter of 210.79 km and define a surface water catchment area of 740.11 km². Internal differentiation of the hydrographic system allowed the identification of 24 sub-basins, 10 of which drain directly into the Tres Palos Lagoon, while the remaining 14 have internal drainage.
The basin's morphology, viewed from a two-dimensional plane, is asymmetrical, as the watershed follows an irregular pattern with sinuous, uneven contours. This condition is also reflected in the drainage organization, resulting in differential development of the network, with a higher density of tributaries on the western slope than on the eastern slope, suggesting the influence of a well-defined tectonic structure. The hydrological network of the basin developed on basements composed of granite-granodiorite and metamorphic units formed during the Paleozoic, Tertiary, Paleogene, and Upper Proterozoic. It is characterized by main rivers averaging 9.5 km in length and an average drainage density of 4.7 km/km². These characteristics have favored the development of predominantly detrital patterns; however, the presence of faults and regional lineaments conditions the orientation of the channels, giving rise to sectors with subdentric and subparallel patterns.
The fluvial system reaches order 7, with the La Sabana River as the highest-order river. Drainage systems of orders 5, 6, and 7 are influenced by tectonic processes, while those of orders lower than 4 tend to be associated with erosional processes and are in the headwaters of the sub-basins, where steep slopes are prominent. The La Sabana River is the main channel of the basin and has a total length of 66.75 km, extending from the basin's headwaters at Cerro de San Nicolás, at approximately 2,262 meters above sea level, to its mouth at the Tres Palos Lagoon. Along this stretch, the channel reaches drainage order 7, which is recognized from the town of km 48 and is maintained until its mouth.
In the upper part of the basin, the main channel is consolidated by the confluence of two important streams: firstly, the Potrerillos River, which flows near the town of km 48, and secondly, the Moyoapa River, which flows near the town of km 39. These confluences define the La Sabana River as the main collector, concentrating the runoff and conveying water flows from the mountains to the coastal plain. According to the National Water Commission in Mexico (2024), the water resources of the La Sabana aquifer have an average annual availability of 35,220,061 m³. The average annual recharge received by the aquifer amounts to 92,000,000 m³, comprised of approximately 72,900,000 m³/year of vertical recharge from rainfall and infiltration, as well as 19,100,000 m³/year of horizontal groundwater inflow.
Regarding surface water, the aquifer is estimated to contribute approximately 11,000,000 m³/year of base flow to the La Sabana River basin. However, it is important to note that the water supply of the urban and tourist area of the basin does not depend entirely on this aquifer, as it also uses external sources such as the Papagayo River, where the current registered exploitation reaches an extraction volume of 35,579,939 m³ per year, according to the Public Registry of Water Rights 2022.

3.4. Indicators of the Sub-Basins of the La Sabana River

The morphometric indicators of the La Sabana River sub-basins (Table 4) show a marked spatial variability in size, drainage organization, and topographic relief conditions. The basin areas range from 3.04 km², reflecting a heterogeneous hydrographic structure composed of small coastal units and larger basins in the upper part of the watershed. The indicators associated with the drainage network indicate a well-developed hydrological system, with high stream frequency (18.4–33.5 n/km²) and drainage density (3.8–5.4 km/km²), revealing efficient runoff concentration in most sub-basins.
Regarding topographic relief, very pronounced altitudinal contrasts are observed, with differences ranging from 120 m in the lowlands to 1800 m in the mountainous sectors, indicating high variability in relief energy. Consistently, this relationship is evident in the mean slope values (3.1°–15.5°), which reflect a transition from relatively stable terrain sectors to areas with steeper slopes, indicating greater erosive activity. These variations highlight the existence of differentiated hydrogeomorphological conditions within the basin, which are analyzed in greater detail in the following sections.

3.4.1. Basin Geometry

The geometry of the sub-basins in the La Sabana River basin was evaluated using the complementary set of shape factor (Ff) and elongation ratio (Re) indicators to recognize the hydrological response potential [93]. These indices were calculated from the attributes of each sub-basin (A, P, and Lb).
On the one hand, the elongation ratio characterizes the basin's geometry, defined as the ratio of the basin area to the square of its maximum length [94]. The range of values for the elongation ratio is between 0 and 1; the closer to 1, the more circular the basin geometry. Basins can be classified into four groups: elongated (< 0.5), slightly elongated (0.5–0.7), oval (0.7–0.8), and circular (≤ 0.8) [95]. The Re values for the sub-basins range from 0.4 to 1, with a higher concentration between 0.6 and 0.8; these values indicate moderate elongation for most sub-basins. The lowest values are recorded for sub-basins S5 (0.4) and S24 (0.5), while the highest are for sub-basins S6 and S22 (0.85). Specifically, sub-basin S22 is at the extreme threshold of the analyzed set with a value of 1.
On the other hand, the shape factor (Ff) refers to the consistency of the basin's watershed and is the result of the relative relationship between the total basin area and the square of its length [45]. Sub-basins with high values are characterized by a flow that concentrates water more quickly, while those with low values distribute the flow more slowly and steadily.
The results for this indicator range from 0.1 to 0.8; values between 0.1 and 0.4 are the lowest and correspond to elongated geometric configurations, as seen in sub-basins 5, 10, 14, 15, and 24, indicating higher flow intensity over short periods. The highest values (Ff ≥ 0.6) are recorded in sub-basins S6, S16, and S18 and are associated with more compact geometries.
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of indicators associated with the geometry of the La Sabana River sub-basins.
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of indicators associated with the geometry of the La Sabana River sub-basins.
Preprints 211138 g005

3.4.2. Drainage Network

Drainage network analysis is important in the study of watersheds because it enables an understanding of the organization and functioning of the river system [94].
The analysis of the results related to the morphometric indices associated with the drainage network in this study is integrated into three blocks that refer to the hierarchy and organization of the network (U, Un, and Rb), development of the drainage pattern (Tls and Lu), and drainage density and texture (Fs, Dt, and Dd). The resulting values for the sub-basins of the La Sabana River show significant variations in the organization, hierarchy, and development of the river system, indicating sectors with a greater capacity to concentrate surface runoff within the study area.
The classification of drainage order (U), based on the criteria established by Strahler [30], ranges from third to sixth order at the sub-basin level. Based on drainage development, this result indicates structural contrasts [46]. The sub-basins that reach order six are S1, S4, S6, and S7, reflecting the development of a more integrated drainage system under tectonic control. Sub-basins S19 and S22, on the other hand, exhibit order three, the lowest hierarchy, and are associated with hydrological development driven by erosional processes.
The bifurcation ratio (Rb) ranges from 1.5 to 2.7, initially suggesting moderate branching in surface hydrological development. However, sub-basins S10 and S15, which show the highest values (2.8 and 2.7), indicate the development of their drainage networks over mountainous terrain with moderate to steep slopes and a rapid flood-response in flow rates.
The total channel length (Tls) expresses the total length of the drainage system, and the values in the sub-basins of this study range from 11.8 km to 394.4 km. Sub-basins S4, S6, and S7 stand out for having the greatest lengths, which likely correspond to larger areas of development and more integrated networks, in contrast to the smaller sub-basins with the shortest lengths. Regarding the length of the main channel (Lu), sub-basin S16 revealed a length of 1.6 km, and sub-basin S7 a length of 23.8 km.
The drainage density and texture indicators have revealed a high degree of surface dissection for most sub-basins. On the one hand, the stream frequency index (Fs) ranges from 22 to 33 km/km², while the density (Dd) ranges from 3.8 to 5.4 km/km². These results demonstrate relatively dense and well-integrated drainage patterns that efficiently evacuate surface runoff.
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of indicators associated with the drainage network of the La Sabana River sub-basins.
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of indicators associated with the drainage network of the La Sabana River sub-basins.
Preprints 211138 g006aPreprints 211138 g006b

3.4.3. Topographic Relief

The spatial distribution of basin morphometric indices associated with topographic relief (Figure 7) has allowed for the identification of distinct stages in the morphodynamic development of the sub-basins, based on relief energy (Er), average slope (Sm), and relief ratio (Rr).
The findings reveal marked contrasts in the relief of the sub-basins. Maximum altitudes (Hmax) range from 103 to 2,262 meters, while minimum altitudes range from 0 to 474 meters. The spatial distribution of these values validated the proposed geomorphological regionalization for the basin, differentiating the upper, middle, and lower sectors.
Relief energy (R) was calculated as the maximum altitude difference across the surface of the sub-basins [37]. The values of this indicator range from 88 to 1,878 meters across the sub-basins under study. Intensities exceeding 1,000 m are in the upper basin region for sub-basins S4, S3, S5, and S7. These areas are characterized by the most active erosion processes, owing to heavily dissected valleys with slopes greater than 60°.
In contrast, sub-basins S22, S23, and S24 show areas with values below 120 m, indicating apparent stability, gentle slopes, and a predominance of accumulation and sedimentation processes. Average slope (Sm) values range from 3.1° to 15.5°, with the highest values recorded in sub-basins S9, S16, and S18, and the lowest in sub-basins S22, S21, and S24.
Finally, the calculation of the relief relationship (Rr) links relief energy (Er) with the maximum length of the basin (Lb). The results cover the range from 27.5 m/km to 211.9 m/km. Sub-basins S4, S14, and S16 exhibit the highest values and give rise to areas with high mountains and short lengths; this means that runoff from the main channel descends too quickly before precipitation occurs.

3.4.4. Time of Concentration

The time of concentration (Tc) estimated using Giandotti's formula (1933) ranged from 0.98 to 2.75 hours, indicating a predominantly rapid hydrological response in the sub-basins that make up the La Sabana River basin.
The sub-basins with the shortest concentration are S19 (0.98 h), S14 (1.19 h), S22 (1.20 h), S1 (1.16 h), S16 (1.16 h), and S18 (1.24 h). These units are characterized by small spatial dimensions and shorter main channel lengths, which favors an accelerated concentration of surface runoff. In contrast, the sub-basins with the longest concentration times include S17 (2.75 h), S6 (2.62 h), S7 (2.61 h), S13 (2.48 h), and S11 (2.39 h), which exhibit greater structural development of the drainage system and longer flow lengths in the main channel, increasing the time required for water to reach the outlet.
The spatial distribution of Tc reveals that the river system comprises sub-basins with varying levels of flow concentration efficiency, with higher values in the middle part of the basin and lower values dominating smaller coastal sub-basins. This results in contrasts in the rate at which each contributes to the main channel flow during rainfall.
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of the time of concentration (Tc) in the sub-basins of the La Sabana River.
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of the time of concentration (Tc) in the sub-basins of the La Sabana River.
Preprints 211138 g008

3.4.5. Hypsometric Index Estimation and Hypsometric Curve Analysis

The hypsometric index values for the basin range from 0.040 (S13) to 0.388 (S6). These results reflect advanced geomorphological evolution in the analyzed units (Figure 9). In morphodynamic terms, these values indicate that most sub-basins have undergone progressive, continuous denudation. Although the basin's relief energy is 2,262 m, the average value across the basin is 496 m, reinforcing the idea of a geomorphologically evolved landscape. In contrast, sub-basins S6 (0.338), S7 (0.329), and S4 (0.306) exhibit relatively higher values for the hypsometric integral index, indicating the presence of morphological features that are likely preserved compared to the other sub-basins.

3.5. Correlation Matrix Between Morphometric Indicators

The evaluation of interdependence among the morphometric indices calculated for the La Sabana River sub-basins was conducted using a Pearson correlation matrix, with a threshold of r ≥ 0.7 for the analyzed variables. The matrix reveals a pattern of high collinearity between the indicators associated with basin geometry and the drainage network, as shown in Figure 10.
In particular, the basin area (A) shows perfect correlations (r ≈ 0.99) with the total channel length (Tls) and the number of streams (Nu), indicating that the drainage system tends to develop more fully in larger sub-basins. Furthermore, the perimeter (P), basin length (Lb), and main channel length (Lu) are strongly associated (r > 0.90), forming a group of variables that represent the spatial dimensions of the sub-basins. The shape parameters, specifically the elongation ratio (Re) and shape factor (Ff), have been confirmed in their results to describe consistency in the geometric characteristics of sub-basins, with values exceeding r > 0.97.
The index that showed low values was the bifurcation ratio (Rb), in contrast to most other variables. This occurs because drainage develops in a resistant lithological context, dominated by granitic rocks and metamorphic complexes, and is controlled by fractures that govern the organization and development of the fluvial system.
Morphodynamic processes are reflected in the relationship between the maximum elevation (Hmax) of the sub-basins and the relief energy (Er), yielding r values > 0.98. Furthermore, moderate-to-strong associations are maintained with drainage density (Dd) and drainage texture (Dt), indicating that relief characteristics determine the structure and degree of drainage development.
The strong collinearity among the variables analyzed, as shown in the correlation matrix, suggests implementing principal component analysis as a statistical technique. This allows for dimensionality reduction of the morphometric indicators and helps understand the dominant patterns in the sub-basins comprising the La Sabana River basin.
The strong collinearity among the variables, as indicated by the correlation matrix, suggests using principal component analysis to reduce the dimensionality of the morphometric indicators and to identify dominant patterns across the sub-basins that make up the La Sabana River basin.

3.6. Analysis and Interpretation of Principal Components

The high degree of correlation among the morphometric indicators prompted the use of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify the variables influencing the hydrological functioning and morphological development of the La Sabana River sub-basins.
Principal component analysis synthesized the results of the 19 indicators analyzed in this study into two factorial dimensions (principal components) that represent the dominant structure of the fluvial system associated with the basin's geometry, hydrological network, and relief. The scree plot shows an abrupt inflection point between dimensions 1 and 2, which represent the components capturing the largest proportion of variance in the analyzed indicators, as shown in Figure 11. Subsequent components, on the other hand, have individual contributions of less than 10% and provide residual information.
The first principal component explains 52.7% of the total variance, while the second explains 13.1%, together accounting for 65.8% of the variability in the set of analyzed indices.
Principal component analysis shows that PC1 (Dim1) is dominated by indicators associated with the size and drainage network of the basin, particularly the area (A), total channel length (Tls), number of streams (Nu), perimeter (P), main channel length (Lu), and maximum basin length (Lb), which represent high values in the contribution and cos² graphs, as shown in Figure 12. On the other hand, PC2 (Dim2) is primarily influenced by basin-shape indicators, particularly the elongation ratio (Re) and the factor (Ff). These variables contribute significantly to the vertical axis and have orientations opposite to those of PCA1, indicating that PC2 captures independent variation in sub-basin size. Variables such as Rr, Sm, and Wb contribute partially to this component, suggesting a dimension related to geometric configuration and relative dissection.

4. Discussion

The results reveal a hydrogeomorphological structure highly susceptible to hazardous geomorphological processes during extreme hydrometeorological events. The discussion integrates these findings along three lines: morphometric comparison with equivalent coastal basins, interpretation of the dominant controls of the fluvial system, and implications for coastal risk governance.
The drainage density values (3.8–5.4 km/km²) are consistent with those reported by Abdo [97] and Alam and Ahmed [15] in tropical coastal basins prone to flash floods, where densities greater than 3.5 km/km² are associated with accelerated surface runoff. Chissende, Mehmood [16] and Melsse, Tegegne [17] confirm that values above 4.5 km/km² increase susceptibility to flash floods, a pattern identified in sub-basins S4, S6, and S7, which contain the most integrated networks in the system.
The estimated concentration times (0.98–2.75 h) place the basin within a predominantly rapid response range. Garzon, Johnson [14] documented that concentration times below 1.5 h correlate with high-magnitude, short-duration flow peaks, reducing the available warning windows. This condition directly affects the coastal sub-basins S19, S14, S1, and S22, whose locations expose them to accumulated flow from higher elevations during cyclonic events, such as those recorded in Acapulco in 2023 and 2024. The hypsometric index values (0.04–0.388) indicate a system with an advanced geomorphological level, although the upper basin sub-basins (S4, S6, S7) retain active morphodynamic features associated with the generation of sediment flows during extreme rainfall, as documented by Valderrama-Landeros, Pérez-Espinosa [22] after Hurricane Otis.
The PCA confirms that the hydrogeomorphological behavior of the system is organized around two dimensions that account for 65.8% of the variance: PC1 (52.7%), associated with basin size and drainage network, and PC2 (13.1%), associated with basin shape. This structure is consistent with Gajbhiye [19], who identifies these same axes as primary controls in basin prioritization.
The identification of sub-basins with Tc ≤ 1.5 h provides a spatially explicit basis for prioritizing early-warning interventions and land-use regulation, addressing the need recognized by Carapuço and Taborda [11] and Pasquier and Few [12] to integrate physical-geographic knowledge into operational frameworks for coastal governance.
The overlap between areas of high morphometric susceptibility and settlements on alluvial plains and unstable slopes, documented in Castillo [89] and [90], reveals a structural gap between available territorial knowledge and its incorporation into planning instruments. This gap has also been identified by Zanin, Barbanente [9], and Cienfuegos [10] as one of the central challenges of coastal governance in developing tropical regions. The replicability of the proposed framework, based on open data sources and freely accessible tools, represents an additional advantage for its institutional adoption in contexts with limited technical capacities.
Overall, the results highlight that the hydrogeomorphological dynamics of the La Sabana River basin cannot be explained by individual morphometric parameters alone, but rather by their combined spatial configuration. The interaction among basin geometry, drainage network hierarchy, relief energy, and coastal positioning defines distinct functional responses across sub-basins. This reinforces the need to interpret morphometric indicators within an integrated framework, where their explanatory value emerges from their relational and spatial context, particularly in tropical coastal environments exposed to extreme hydrometeorological forcing and rapid urban expansion.

5. Conclusions

This study developed an integrated physical-geographic and multivariate framework to analyze the geomorphological and multi-hazard dynamics associated with tropical storms in the coastal La Sabana River basin in southern Mexico. The combined assessment of morphometric parameters, physical-environmental conditions, and their synthesis through principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated that susceptibility to coupled hazards—particularly floods and landslides—is not controlled by isolated factors, but by the interaction between basin geometry, drainage network hierarchy, relief configuration, and patterns of urban expansion in vulnerable zones such as alluvial plains and unstable slopes.
In morphometric terms, the high drainage density (average 4.7 km/km²), the predominance of short concentration times (0.98–2.75 h), and the PCA structure—explaining 65.8% of the variance in two components associated with basin size and drainage organization—indicate that the system has a high capacity for rapid runoff concentration and efficient flow propagation. Sub-basins with Tc ≤ 1.5 h emerge as priority units due to their greater predisposition to rapid hydrological response under extreme rainfall conditions.
From a multi-hazard perspective, the results highlight that coastal location and basin compactness can enhance hydrological responsiveness even in areas with lower relative relief, emphasizing that hazard potential results from interacting geomorphological controls rather than from single morphometric indicators. This confirms that morphometric and multivariate analyses provide a robust basis for identifying spatial patterns of susceptibility in complex environments where hydrological and slope processes converge.
From a coastal risk governance perspective, the study provides a spatially explicit and methodologically reproducible framework to support land-use planning, risk-informed zoning, and the design of early warning systems at the sub-basin scale. The use of open-access geospatial data and reproducible analytical procedures enhances the applicability of the approach in tropical coastal regions with limited technical and institutional capacities.
Finally, future research should incorporate hydrometric observations and extreme precipitation frequency analyses to validate and extend the proposed framework toward quantitative assessments of multi-hazard risk. Integrating morphometric analysis with hydroclimatic and geotechnical variables will be essential to advance from susceptibility-based interpretations toward predictive models of geomorphological response under changing environmental

References

  1. Laignel, B., et al., Observation of the coastal areas, estuaries and deltas from space. Surveys in Geophysics, 2023. 44(5): p. 1309-1356. [CrossRef]
  2. Ward, N.D., et al., Representing the function and sensitivity of coastal interfaces in Earth system models. Nature communications, 2020. 11(1): p. 2458. [CrossRef]
  3. Kron, W., Coasts: the high-risk areas of the world. Natural hazards, 2013. 66(3): p. 1363-1382. [CrossRef]
  4. Melet, A., et al., Earth observations for monitoring marine coastal hazards and their drivers. Surveys in Geophysics, 2020. 41(6): p. 1489-1534. [CrossRef]
  5. Lai, Y., et al., Global compound floods from precipitation and storm surge: Hazards and the roles of cyclones. Journal of Climate, 2021. 34(20): p. 8319-8339. [CrossRef]
  6. Lazarus, E.D., et al., An evolving research agenda for human–coastal systems. Geomorphology, 2016. 256: p. 81-90. [CrossRef]
  7. Zúñiga, E. and V. Magaña, Vulnerability and risk to intense rainfall in Mexico: The effect of land use cover change. Investigaciones geográficas, 2018(95): p. 0-0.
  8. Rentschler, J., et al., Global evidence of rapid urban growth in flood zones since 1985. Nature, 2023. 622(7981): p. 87-92. [CrossRef]
  9. Zanin, G.M., et al., Traditional vs. novel approaches to coastal risk management: A review and insights from Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023. 346: p. 119003. [CrossRef]
  10. Cienfuegos, R., Flood risk from geophysical and hydroclimatic hazards: an essential integration for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation in the coastal zone. Natural Hazards, 2023. 119(2): p. 1113-1115. [CrossRef]
  11. Carapuço, M.M., et al., How to foster scientific knowledge integration in coastal management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2021. 209: p. 105661. [CrossRef]
  12. Pasquier, U., et al., “We can’t do it on our own!”—Integrating stakeholder and scientific knowledge of future flood risk to inform climate change adaptation planning in a coastal region. Environmental Science & Policy, 2020. 103: p. 50-57. [CrossRef]
  13. Obeidat, M., M. Awawdeh, and F. Al-Hantouli, Morphometric analysis and prioritisation of watersheds for flood risk management in Wadi Easal Basin (WEB), Jordan, using geospatial technologies. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2021. 14(2): p. e12711. [CrossRef]
  14. Garzon, L.F.L., et al., Exploring the effects of catchment morphometry on overland flow response to extreme rainfall using a 2D hydraulic-hydrological model (IBER). Journal of Hydrology, 2023. 627: p. 130405. [CrossRef]
  15. Alam, A., B. Ahmed, and P. Sammonds, Flash flood susceptibility assessment using the parameters of drainage basin morphometry in SE Bangladesh. Quaternary International, 2021. 575: p. 295-307. [CrossRef]
  16. Chissende, A., et al., Riverine flood susceptibility assessment using drainage basin morphometry in the Bahe River. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2025. 117: p. 105181. [CrossRef]
  17. Melsse, D.W., et al., Morphometric analysis for understanding river basin hydrology: a case of gelda watershed, Tana Sub-Basin, Ethiopia. Applied Water Science, 2025. 15(7): p. 171. [CrossRef]
  18. Salhi, A., et al., Soil erosion and hydroclimatic hazards in major African port cities: the case study of Tangier. Scientific Reports, 2023. 13(1): p. 13158. [CrossRef]
  19. Gajbhiye, M.S.S., SK, Prioritization of watershed through morphometric parameters: a PCA-based approach. Applied Water Science, 2017. 7(3): p. 1505-1519.
  20. Laino, E., et al., A novel multi-hazard risk assessment framework for coastal cities under climate change. Science of The Total Environment, 2024. 954: p. 176638. [CrossRef]
  21. Gallina, V., et al., A multi-risk methodology for the assessment of climate change impacts in coastal zones. Sustainability, 2020. 12(9): p. 3697. [CrossRef]
  22. Valderrama-Landeros, L., et al., Shoreline Response to Hurricane Otis and Flooding Impact from Hurricane John in Acapulco, Mexico. Coasts, 2025. 5(3): p. 28. [CrossRef]
  23. INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Continuo de Elevaciones Mexicano (CEM) 3.0. 2013: México.
  24. Chorley, R.J. and B.A. Kennedy, Physical geography: a systems approach. (No Title), 1971.
  25. Schumm, S.A., M.D. Harvey, and C.C. Watson, Incised channels: morphology, dynamics, and control. (No Title), 1984.
  26. Di Baldassarre, G., et al., Sociohydrology: scientific challenges in addressing the sustainable development goals. Water Resources Research, 2019. 55(8): p. 6327-6355. [CrossRef]
  27. Letsinger, S.L., et al., Geohydrology: Watershed Hydrology. 2021.
  28. Strahler, A.N., Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1957. 38(6): p. 913-920.
  29. Schumm, S.A., The Fluvial System. , ed. Wiley. 1977, New York.
  30. Montgomery, D.R. and M.T. Brandon, Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002. 201(3-4): p. 481-489. [CrossRef]
  31. Chorley, R.J., Schumm, S. A., & Sugden, D. E., Geomorphology ed. M.a.C. Ltd. 1984 New York.
  32. Tucker, G.E. and R. Slingerland, Drainage basin responses to climate change. Water Resources Research, 1997. 33(8): p. 2031-2047. [CrossRef]
  33. Kirby, E. and K.X. Whipple, Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes. Journal of structural geology, 2012. 44: p. 54-75. [CrossRef]
  34. Whipple, K.X., Bedrock rivers and the geomorphology of active orogens. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 2004. 32(1): p. 151-185. [CrossRef]
  35. Hale, R.L., et al., Stormwater infrastructure controls runoff and dissolved material export from arid urban watersheds. Ecosystems, 2015. 18(1): p. 62-75. [CrossRef]
  36. Lugo, H.J., Elementos de geomorfología aplicada. 1988: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  37. Lugo, H.J., Diccionario geomorfológico. 1ª edición ed. 2011, Ciudad de México, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  38. Horton, R.E., Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological society of America bulletin, 1945. 56(3): p. 275-370. [CrossRef]
  39. Strahler, A.N., Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. Handbook of applied hydrology, 1964.
  40. Pike, R.J., Geomorphometry-diversity in quantitative surface analysis. Progress in physical geography, 2000. 24(1): p. 1-20.
  41. Leopold, L.B., et al., Fluvial processes in geomorphology. 2020: Courier Dover Publications.
  42. Schumm, S.A., Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological society of America bulletin, 1956. 67(5): p. 597-646. [CrossRef]
  43. Patton, P.C., Drainage basin morphometry and floods. Flood Geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons New York. 1988. p 51-64. 11 fig, 1 tab, 67 ref., 1988.
  44. Gregory, K.J. and D.E. Walling, Drainage basin form and process: a geomorphological approach. (No Title), 1973.
  45. Horton, R.E., Drainage-basin characteristics. Transactions, American geophysical union, 1932. 13(1): p. 350-361.
  46. De Pedraza, G.J.G., Rosa María Carrasco, Geomorfología: principios, métodos y aplicaciones. 1996: Rueda.
  47. Guerra, V. and M. Lazzari, Geomorphic approaches to estimate short-term erosion rates: An example from Valmarecchia river system (Northern Apennines, Italy). Water, 2020. 12(9): p. 2535. [CrossRef]
  48. Nag, S. and S. Chakraborty, Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2003. 31(1): p. 25-35. [CrossRef]
  49. Thomas, J., S. Joseph, and K. Thrivikramaji, Morphometric aspects of a small tropical mountain river system, the southern Western Ghats, India. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2010. 3(2): p. 135-156. [CrossRef]
  50. Strahler, A.N., Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geological society of America bulletin, 1952. 63(11): p. 1117-1142. [CrossRef]
  51. Pike, R.J. and S.E. Wilson, Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral, and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1971. 82(4): p. 1079-1084. [CrossRef]
  52. Willgoose, G. and G. Hancock, Revisiting the hypsometric curve as an indicator of form and process in transport-limited catchment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Group, 1998. 23(7): p. 611-623. [CrossRef]
  53. Chow, V.T., D.R. Maidment, and W. Larry, Mays. Applied Hydrology. International edition, MacGraw-Hill, Inc, 1988. 149.
  54. Giandotti, M., Previsione delle piene e delle magre dei corsi d'acqua. 1933.
  55. Jackson, J.E., A user's guide to principal components. 2005: John Wiley & Sons.
  56. Jolliffe, I., Principal component analysis. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, 2005.
  57. De la Lanza Espino, G., M.A.O. Pérez, and J.L.C. Pérez, Diferenciación hidrogeomorfológica de los ambientes costeros del Pacífico, del Golfo de México y del Mar Caribe. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, 2013. 2013(81): p. 33-50. [CrossRef]
  58. Raisz, E., Landforms of Mexico, mapa escala 1: 3,000,000: Cambridge. 1962, Mass.
  59. Koppen, W., Das geographische system de klimate. Handbuch der klimatologie, 1936.
  60. García, E., Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen (para adaptarlo a las condiciones de la República Mexicana). 1973, México: Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  61. INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Uso del suelo y vegetación, escala 1:250000, serie VII (continuo nacional). 2021, Aguascalientes, México.
  62. François, M., et al., Interactions Between Forest Cover and Watershed Hydrology: A Conceptual Meta-Analysis. Water, 2024. 16(23): p. 3350. [CrossRef]
  63. Galleguillos, M., et al., Disentangling the effect of future land use strategies and climate change on streamflow in a Mediterranean catchment dominated by tree plantations. Journal of Hydrology, 2021. 595: p. 126047. [CrossRef]
  64. Bonell, M. and D. Gilmour, The development of overland flow in a tropical rainforest catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 1978. 39(3-4): p. 365-382. [CrossRef]
  65. Bruijnzeel, L.A., Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2004. 104(1): p. 185-228. [CrossRef]
  66. Alongi, D.M., Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 2008. 76(1): p. 1-13. [CrossRef]
  67. Friess, D.A., et al., The state of the world's mangrove forests: past, present, and future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2019. 44(1): p. 89-115. [CrossRef]
  68. Menéndez, P., et al., The global flood protection benefits of mangroves. Scientific reports, 2020. 10(1): p. 4404. [CrossRef]
  69. Narayan, S., et al., The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences. PloS one, 2016. 11(5): p. e0154735. [CrossRef]
  70. Campa, M.F. and P.J. Coney, Tectono-stratigraphic terranes and mineral resource distributions in Mexico. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1983. 20(6): p. 1040-1051. [CrossRef]
  71. Lugo Hubp, J. and C. Córdova, Regionalización geomorfológica de la República Mexicana. Investigaciones Geográficas, 1992. 1(25). [CrossRef]
  72. Sedlock, R.L., F. Ortega-Gutiérrez, and R.C. Speed, Tectonostratigraphic terranes and tectonic evolution of Mexico. 1993.
  73. Centeno, G., Elena, M. Guerrero-Suástegui, and O. Talavera-Mendoza, The Guerrero composite terrane of western Mexico: Collision and subsequent rifting in a supra-subduction zone. 2008.
  74. Salinas, P.J., O. Monod, and M. Faure, Ductile deformations of opposite vergence in the eastern part of the Guerrero Terrane (SW Mexico). Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 2000. 13(4-5): p. 389-402. [CrossRef]
  75. Ortega, G.F. and H. Elías, M. Wholesale melting of the southern Mixteco terrane and origin of the Xolapa Complex [abs.]. in Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program. 2003.
  76. Ducea, M.N., et al., Geologic evolution of the Xolapa Complex, southern Mexico: Evidence from U-Pb zircon geochronology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2004. 116(7-8): p. 1016-1025. [CrossRef]
  77. Pérez, G.R., et al., Mesozoic geologic evolution of the Xolapa migmatitic complex north of Acapulco, southern Mexico: implications for paleogeographic reconstructions. Revista mexicana de ciencias geológicas, 2009. 26(1): p. 201-221.
  78. Corona, C.P., Deformazione, metamorfismo e meccanismi di segregazione migmatitica nel complesso plutonico-metamorfico nel terreno Xolapa, Messico dottorato di ricerca. 1997.
  79. Ortega, G.F., Metamorphic belts of southern Mexico and their tectonic significance. Geofísica Internacional, 1981. 20(3): p. 177-202. [CrossRef]
  80. Corona-Chávez, P., S. Poli, and B. Bigioggero, Syn-deformational migmatites and magmatic-arc metamorphism in the Xolapa Complex, southern Mexico. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2006. 24(3): p. 169-191. [CrossRef]
  81. Morán Zenteno, D.J., Investigaciones isotopicas de RB-Sr y Sm-Nd en rocas cristalinas de la region de Tierra Colorada-Acapulco-Cruz Grande, Estado de Guerrero. 1992.
  82. Ducea, M.N., et al., Rates of sediment recycling beneath the Acapulco trench: Constraints from (U-Th)/He thermochronology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2005. 109(B9). [CrossRef]
  83. De Cserna, Z., Reconocimiento geológico en la Sierra Madre del sur de México: entre Chilpancingo y Acapulco, Estado de Guerrero. Vol. 62. 1965: Instituto de Geología, UNAM.
  84. INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Información topográfica: Carta E14C47 Xaltianguis, escala 1:50 000, Serie III. 2015: Aguascalientes, México.
  85. INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Información topográfica: Cartas E14C57 y E14C67 Acapulco de Juárez, escala 1:50 000. 2023: Aguascalientes, México.
  86. INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020. 2020: Aguascalientes, México.
  87. INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Red Nacional de Caminos (RNC). Información de interés nacional, INEGI, Editor. 2024.
  88. Gobierno del Estado de Guerrero, Plan Director Urbano de la Zona Metropolitana de Acapulco. 2001: Guerrero, México.
  89. Castillo, E.A.B.A., Iliana Villerías, Análisis espacio–temporal de la transformación urbana de Acapulco 1930-2020. Ciencias Espaciales, 2025. 16(1): p. 25-46. [CrossRef]
  90. Gervacio, J.H., B.C. Elías, and S.V. Salinas, Huracán Otis en Acapulco, Guerrero: Vulnerabilidad socioeconómica y ambiental ante los impactos del fenómeno hidrometeorológico. 2024: Comunicacion Científica.
  91. CONAGUA, C.N.d.A., Regiones Hidrológico-Administrativas, CONAGUA, Editor. 2013: México.
  92. CONAGUA, C.N.d.A., Programa Nacional Hídrico 2020–2024. 2020: Ciudad de México.
  93. Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. and J.B. Valdés, The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response. Water resources research, 1979. 15(6): p. 1409-1420. [CrossRef]
  94. Abdo, H.G., Evolving a total-evaluation map of flash flood hazard for hydro-prioritization based on geohydromorphometric parameters and GIS–RS manner in Al-Hussain river basin, Tartous, Syria. Natural Hazards, 2020. 104(1): p. 681-703. [CrossRef]
  95. Pareta, K. and U. Pareta, Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2011. 2(1): p. 248-269.
Figure 2. Methodological framework for the physical-geographic analysis of the basin. The diagram shows each stage developed and the relationships among the procedures.
Figure 2. Methodological framework for the physical-geographic analysis of the basin. The diagram shows each stage developed and the relationships among the procedures.
Preprints 211138 g002
Figure 3. Spatial Distribution of Natural Features in the Study Area. a) Topographic relief, b) Types of climates, c) Soil groups, d) Vegetation cover and Geology.
Figure 3. Spatial Distribution of Natural Features in the Study Area. a) Topographic relief, b) Types of climates, c) Soil groups, d) Vegetation cover and Geology.
Preprints 211138 g003
Figure 4. Spatial Distribution of Anthropogenic Features in the Study Area.
Figure 4. Spatial Distribution of Anthropogenic Features in the Study Area.
Preprints 211138 g004
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of indicators associated with the topographic relief of the La Sabana River sub-basins.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of indicators associated with the topographic relief of the La Sabana River sub-basins.
Preprints 211138 g007
Figure 9. Hypsometric curves of the sub-basins of the La Sabana River show their stages of geomorphological development.
Figure 9. Hypsometric curves of the sub-basins of the La Sabana River show their stages of geomorphological development.
Preprints 211138 g009
Figure 10. Pearson correlation matrix between the morphometric indicators of the analyzed basins.
Figure 10. Pearson correlation matrix between the morphometric indicators of the analyzed basins.
Preprints 211138 g010
Figure 11. The scree plot shows the percentage of variance explained by each main component.
Figure 11. The scree plot shows the percentage of variance explained by each main component.
Preprints 211138 g011
Figure 12. Percentage contribution of the variables to the principal components and their representation of cos².
Figure 12. Percentage contribution of the variables to the principal components and their representation of cos².
Preprints 211138 g012
Table 1. Morphometric indicators are associated with basin geometry and their mathematical expressions.
Table 1. Morphometric indicators are associated with basin geometry and their mathematical expressions.
No. Indicator Symbol Equation Reference
1 Area (Km2) A Basin polygon [42]
2 Perimeter (Km) P Catchment boundary [42]
3 Maximum basin length (Km) Lb Basin polygon [44]
4 Maximum basin width (Km) Wb Basin polygon [44]
5 Elongation ratio Re Re = 2   ( A / π ) / L b [42]
6 Form Factor Ff F f = A L b 2 [45]
Table 2. Morphometric indicators of the drainage network and their mathematical expressions.
Table 2. Morphometric indicators of the drainage network and their mathematical expressions.
No. Indicator Symbol Equation Reference
7 Stream order U Hierarchical rank [28]
8 Number of streams Nu N u = N 1 + N 2 + N n [28]
9 Total stream length Tsl Total length of streams [38]
10 Main channel length Lu Distance from the channel head to the outlet [38]
11 Bifurcation ratio Rb R b = N u / N u + 1 [42]
12 Stream frequency Fs F s = T s l A [38]
13 Drainage texture Dt Dt=Nu/P [38]
14 Drainage density Dd D d = Σ T l s A [38]
Table 3. Morphometric indicators associated with topographic relief and their mathematical expressions.
Table 3. Morphometric indicators associated with topographic relief and their mathematical expressions.
No. Indicator Symbol Equation Reference
15 Maximum elevation Hmax DEM [42]
16 Minimum elevation Hmin DEM [42]
17 Basin relief Er Z m a x Z m i n [28]
18 Mean slope Sm S m ° = arctan Z max Z m i n L u [42]
19 Relief ratio Rr R r = E r / L b [42]
Table 4. Morphometric index values of the 24 sub-basins of the Rio la Sabana basin.
Table 4. Morphometric index values of the 24 sub-basins of the Rio la Sabana basin.
Index S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 S20 S21 S22 S23 S24
A 24.2 22.7 28.4 72.7 30 47.5 61.1 25.7 13.6 14.2 22.4 20.4 15.5 12.6 21.7 16.1 21.9 8 5.5 13.3 12.1 3.04 5.3 9.4
P 33.7 31.8 47.5 67.3 55.5 49.4 66.2 36.4 24.6 26.7 37.1 35.2 29.7 35 29.3 21.6 43.5 14.8 12.4 27.3 27.1 8.3 12.4 25.3
Lb 8.1 6.7 10.3 16.7 15.7 9.1 13.5 6.9 5.3 7.8 8.2 7.5 6.1 8.2 8.1 2.1 8.3 4.1 4.1 5.5 5.3 1.9 3.2 1.9
Wb 3.2 6.3 3.3 5.7 2.9 8.6 4.9 6.1 3.5 2.5 3.6 3.6 4.1 0.9 3 8.3 3.3 2.8 1.6 3.5 4.1 2.1 3.1 10.2
Re 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.85 0.65 0.8 0.8 0.55 0.65 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.65 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.65 0.75 0.7 1 0.8 0.4
Ff 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.1
U 6 5 5 6 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 3 5 4 3 4 4
Nu 809 714 917 2439 892 1465 1923 730 387 374 632 646 509 346 593 413 634 192 102 337 361 67 131 244
Tls 125.9 116.2 136.8 391.4 149.7 233.9 316.6 128.6 62.2 70.1 108.6 109.9 78 61.3 116.7 81.7 110.1 37.6 21.8 59.6 55.1 11.8 21.3 39.2
Lu 2.9 7.4 15.4 22.7 18.8 17.2 23.8 7.8 6.4 8.7 12.3 11.4 9.1 9.8 9.4 2.3 13.3 4.3 1.6 8.2 8.6 2.1 1.8 2.3
Rb 1.9 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.7 2 1.9 2.8 1.7 2.1 1.9 1.7 2.7 2 1.8 1.8 1.5 2.2 1.8 2.1 1.7 1.6
Fs 33.3 31.5 32.2 33.5 29.7 30.8 31.4 28.3 28.3 26.2 28.1 31.6 32.7 27.4 27.2 25.5 28.8 23.9 18.4 25.2 29.9 22.1 24.5 25.9
Dt 23.9 22.4 19.3 36.2 16 29.6 29 20 15.7 14 17 18.3 17 9.8 20.1 19.7 14.5 12.9 8.1 12.3 13.3 8.1 10.5 9.6
Dd 5.2 5.1 4.8 5.3 4.9 4.9 5.1 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.8 5.4 5 4.8 5.3 5 5 4.7 3.9 4.4 4.5 3.8 3.9 4.1
Hmax 1142 383 1468 2262 1987 743 1122 465 607 663 480 430 239 940 860 445 310 320 224 288 164 124 106 103
Hmin 474 941 474 384 376 93 96 33 33 31 23 23 19 19 15 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 18 6
Er 668 558 994 1878 1611 650 1026 432 574 632 385 407 220 921 845 445 310 320 224 287 164 111 88 97
Sm 13.3 13.21 8.9 12.5 13.6 11.9 10.9 13.4 15.5 12.9 8.1 9.3 9.1 10.8 13.3 13.9 6.2 12.8 12.1 9.2 5.4 3.1 5.9 4.3
Rr 82.4 83.2 96.5 112.5 102.6 71.43 76 62.6 108.3 81.03 46.95 54.2 36 112.3 104.3 211.9 37.3 78 54.6 52.1 30.9 58.4 27.5 51
A, área de la subcuenca (km²); P, perímetro (km); Lb, longitud máxima de la cuenca (km); Wb, ancho medio de la cuenca (km); Re, relación de elongación (adimensional); Ff, factor de forma (adimensional); U, orden máximo de drenaje (n); Nu, número total de cauces (n); Tls, longitud total de la red de drenaje (km); Lu, longitud total del cauce (km); Rb, relación de bifurcación (adimensional); Fs, frecuencia de corrientes (n/km²); Dt, textura de drenaje (n); Dd, densidad de drenaje (km/km²); Hmax, elevación máxima (m); Hmin, elevación mínima (m); R, energía del relieve (m); Sm, pendiente media (°); Rr, relación de relieve (m/km).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated

Accessibility

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings