Submitted:
29 April 2026
Posted:
01 May 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area

2.2. Methodology
2.3. Data
2.4. Analysis of the Physical–Geographical Environment
2.5. l Hydrographic Characterization of the Watershed
2.5.1. Spatial Organization of the Basin
2.5.2. Morphometric Evaluation
- a)
- Basin Geometry
- b) Drainage network
- c) Topographic Relief
- d) Time of Concentration (Tc)
- e) Hypsometric integral (Hi)
2.6. Multivariate Principal Component Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Components of the Natural Environment
3.1.1. Relief
3.1.2. Climate
3.1.3. Soil
3.1.4. Vegetation
3.1.5. Regional Lithological and Tectonic Synthesis: Sierra Madre del Sur
3.1.6. Local Geology of the Sabana River Basin: The Xolapa Complex in Acapulco
3.2. Components of the Anthropogenic Environment
3.2.1. Human Settlements, Population, and Housing
3.2.2. Road Infrastructure
3.2.3. Land Use and Territorial Occupation
3.2.4. Administrative and Hydrological Framework
3.3. Hydrographic Configuration of the La Sabana River System
3.4. Indicators of the Sub-Basins of the La Sabana River
3.4.1. Basin Geometry

3.4.2. Drainage Network

3.4.3. Topographic Relief
3.4.4. Time of Concentration

3.4.5. Hypsometric Index Estimation and Hypsometric Curve Analysis
3.5. Correlation Matrix Between Morphometric Indicators
3.6. Analysis and Interpretation of Principal Components
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
References
- Laignel, B., et al., Observation of the coastal areas, estuaries and deltas from space. Surveys in Geophysics, 2023. 44(5): p. 1309-1356. [CrossRef]
- Ward, N.D., et al., Representing the function and sensitivity of coastal interfaces in Earth system models. Nature communications, 2020. 11(1): p. 2458. [CrossRef]
- Kron, W., Coasts: the high-risk areas of the world. Natural hazards, 2013. 66(3): p. 1363-1382. [CrossRef]
- Melet, A., et al., Earth observations for monitoring marine coastal hazards and their drivers. Surveys in Geophysics, 2020. 41(6): p. 1489-1534. [CrossRef]
- Lai, Y., et al., Global compound floods from precipitation and storm surge: Hazards and the roles of cyclones. Journal of Climate, 2021. 34(20): p. 8319-8339. [CrossRef]
- Lazarus, E.D., et al., An evolving research agenda for human–coastal systems. Geomorphology, 2016. 256: p. 81-90. [CrossRef]
- Zúñiga, E. and V. Magaña, Vulnerability and risk to intense rainfall in Mexico: The effect of land use cover change. Investigaciones geográficas, 2018(95): p. 0-0.
- Rentschler, J., et al., Global evidence of rapid urban growth in flood zones since 1985. Nature, 2023. 622(7981): p. 87-92. [CrossRef]
- Zanin, G.M., et al., Traditional vs. novel approaches to coastal risk management: A review and insights from Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023. 346: p. 119003. [CrossRef]
- Cienfuegos, R., Flood risk from geophysical and hydroclimatic hazards: an essential integration for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation in the coastal zone. Natural Hazards, 2023. 119(2): p. 1113-1115. [CrossRef]
- Carapuço, M.M., et al., How to foster scientific knowledge integration in coastal management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2021. 209: p. 105661. [CrossRef]
- Pasquier, U., et al., “We can’t do it on our own!”—Integrating stakeholder and scientific knowledge of future flood risk to inform climate change adaptation planning in a coastal region. Environmental Science & Policy, 2020. 103: p. 50-57. [CrossRef]
- Obeidat, M., M. Awawdeh, and F. Al-Hantouli, Morphometric analysis and prioritisation of watersheds for flood risk management in Wadi Easal Basin (WEB), Jordan, using geospatial technologies. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2021. 14(2): p. e12711. [CrossRef]
- Garzon, L.F.L., et al., Exploring the effects of catchment morphometry on overland flow response to extreme rainfall using a 2D hydraulic-hydrological model (IBER). Journal of Hydrology, 2023. 627: p. 130405. [CrossRef]
- Alam, A., B. Ahmed, and P. Sammonds, Flash flood susceptibility assessment using the parameters of drainage basin morphometry in SE Bangladesh. Quaternary International, 2021. 575: p. 295-307. [CrossRef]
- Chissende, A., et al., Riverine flood susceptibility assessment using drainage basin morphometry in the Bahe River. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2025. 117: p. 105181. [CrossRef]
- Melsse, D.W., et al., Morphometric analysis for understanding river basin hydrology: a case of gelda watershed, Tana Sub-Basin, Ethiopia. Applied Water Science, 2025. 15(7): p. 171. [CrossRef]
- Salhi, A., et al., Soil erosion and hydroclimatic hazards in major African port cities: the case study of Tangier. Scientific Reports, 2023. 13(1): p. 13158. [CrossRef]
- Gajbhiye, M.S.S., SK, Prioritization of watershed through morphometric parameters: a PCA-based approach. Applied Water Science, 2017. 7(3): p. 1505-1519.
- Laino, E., et al., A novel multi-hazard risk assessment framework for coastal cities under climate change. Science of The Total Environment, 2024. 954: p. 176638. [CrossRef]
- Gallina, V., et al., A multi-risk methodology for the assessment of climate change impacts in coastal zones. Sustainability, 2020. 12(9): p. 3697. [CrossRef]
- Valderrama-Landeros, L., et al., Shoreline Response to Hurricane Otis and Flooding Impact from Hurricane John in Acapulco, Mexico. Coasts, 2025. 5(3): p. 28. [CrossRef]
- INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Continuo de Elevaciones Mexicano (CEM) 3.0. 2013: México.
- Chorley, R.J. and B.A. Kennedy, Physical geography: a systems approach. (No Title), 1971.
- Schumm, S.A., M.D. Harvey, and C.C. Watson, Incised channels: morphology, dynamics, and control. (No Title), 1984.
- Di Baldassarre, G., et al., Sociohydrology: scientific challenges in addressing the sustainable development goals. Water Resources Research, 2019. 55(8): p. 6327-6355. [CrossRef]
- Letsinger, S.L., et al., Geohydrology: Watershed Hydrology. 2021.
- Strahler, A.N., Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1957. 38(6): p. 913-920.
- Schumm, S.A., The Fluvial System. , ed. Wiley. 1977, New York.
- Montgomery, D.R. and M.T. Brandon, Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002. 201(3-4): p. 481-489. [CrossRef]
- Chorley, R.J., Schumm, S. A., & Sugden, D. E., Geomorphology ed. M.a.C. Ltd. 1984 New York.
- Tucker, G.E. and R. Slingerland, Drainage basin responses to climate change. Water Resources Research, 1997. 33(8): p. 2031-2047. [CrossRef]
- Kirby, E. and K.X. Whipple, Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes. Journal of structural geology, 2012. 44: p. 54-75. [CrossRef]
- Whipple, K.X., Bedrock rivers and the geomorphology of active orogens. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 2004. 32(1): p. 151-185. [CrossRef]
- Hale, R.L., et al., Stormwater infrastructure controls runoff and dissolved material export from arid urban watersheds. Ecosystems, 2015. 18(1): p. 62-75. [CrossRef]
- Lugo, H.J., Elementos de geomorfología aplicada. 1988: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
- Lugo, H.J., Diccionario geomorfológico. 1ª edición ed. 2011, Ciudad de México, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
- Horton, R.E., Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological society of America bulletin, 1945. 56(3): p. 275-370. [CrossRef]
- Strahler, A.N., Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. Handbook of applied hydrology, 1964.
- Pike, R.J., Geomorphometry-diversity in quantitative surface analysis. Progress in physical geography, 2000. 24(1): p. 1-20.
- Leopold, L.B., et al., Fluvial processes in geomorphology. 2020: Courier Dover Publications.
- Schumm, S.A., Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological society of America bulletin, 1956. 67(5): p. 597-646. [CrossRef]
- Patton, P.C., Drainage basin morphometry and floods. Flood Geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons New York. 1988. p 51-64. 11 fig, 1 tab, 67 ref., 1988.
- Gregory, K.J. and D.E. Walling, Drainage basin form and process: a geomorphological approach. (No Title), 1973.
- Horton, R.E., Drainage-basin characteristics. Transactions, American geophysical union, 1932. 13(1): p. 350-361.
- De Pedraza, G.J.G., Rosa María Carrasco, Geomorfología: principios, métodos y aplicaciones. 1996: Rueda.
- Guerra, V. and M. Lazzari, Geomorphic approaches to estimate short-term erosion rates: An example from Valmarecchia river system (Northern Apennines, Italy). Water, 2020. 12(9): p. 2535. [CrossRef]
- Nag, S. and S. Chakraborty, Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2003. 31(1): p. 25-35. [CrossRef]
- Thomas, J., S. Joseph, and K. Thrivikramaji, Morphometric aspects of a small tropical mountain river system, the southern Western Ghats, India. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2010. 3(2): p. 135-156. [CrossRef]
- Strahler, A.N., Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geological society of America bulletin, 1952. 63(11): p. 1117-1142. [CrossRef]
- Pike, R.J. and S.E. Wilson, Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral, and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1971. 82(4): p. 1079-1084. [CrossRef]
- Willgoose, G. and G. Hancock, Revisiting the hypsometric curve as an indicator of form and process in transport-limited catchment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Group, 1998. 23(7): p. 611-623. [CrossRef]
- Chow, V.T., D.R. Maidment, and W. Larry, Mays. Applied Hydrology. International edition, MacGraw-Hill, Inc, 1988. 149.
- Giandotti, M., Previsione delle piene e delle magre dei corsi d'acqua. 1933.
- Jackson, J.E., A user's guide to principal components. 2005: John Wiley & Sons.
- Jolliffe, I., Principal component analysis. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, 2005.
- De la Lanza Espino, G., M.A.O. Pérez, and J.L.C. Pérez, Diferenciación hidrogeomorfológica de los ambientes costeros del Pacífico, del Golfo de México y del Mar Caribe. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, 2013. 2013(81): p. 33-50. [CrossRef]
- Raisz, E., Landforms of Mexico, mapa escala 1: 3,000,000: Cambridge. 1962, Mass.
- Koppen, W., Das geographische system de klimate. Handbuch der klimatologie, 1936.
- García, E., Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen (para adaptarlo a las condiciones de la República Mexicana). 1973, México: Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
- INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Uso del suelo y vegetación, escala 1:250000, serie VII (continuo nacional). 2021, Aguascalientes, México.
- François, M., et al., Interactions Between Forest Cover and Watershed Hydrology: A Conceptual Meta-Analysis. Water, 2024. 16(23): p. 3350. [CrossRef]
- Galleguillos, M., et al., Disentangling the effect of future land use strategies and climate change on streamflow in a Mediterranean catchment dominated by tree plantations. Journal of Hydrology, 2021. 595: p. 126047. [CrossRef]
- Bonell, M. and D. Gilmour, The development of overland flow in a tropical rainforest catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 1978. 39(3-4): p. 365-382. [CrossRef]
- Bruijnzeel, L.A., Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2004. 104(1): p. 185-228. [CrossRef]
- Alongi, D.M., Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 2008. 76(1): p. 1-13. [CrossRef]
- Friess, D.A., et al., The state of the world's mangrove forests: past, present, and future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2019. 44(1): p. 89-115. [CrossRef]
- Menéndez, P., et al., The global flood protection benefits of mangroves. Scientific reports, 2020. 10(1): p. 4404. [CrossRef]
- Narayan, S., et al., The effectiveness, costs and coastal protection benefits of natural and nature-based defences. PloS one, 2016. 11(5): p. e0154735. [CrossRef]
- Campa, M.F. and P.J. Coney, Tectono-stratigraphic terranes and mineral resource distributions in Mexico. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1983. 20(6): p. 1040-1051. [CrossRef]
- Lugo Hubp, J. and C. Córdova, Regionalización geomorfológica de la República Mexicana. Investigaciones Geográficas, 1992. 1(25). [CrossRef]
- Sedlock, R.L., F. Ortega-Gutiérrez, and R.C. Speed, Tectonostratigraphic terranes and tectonic evolution of Mexico. 1993.
- Centeno, G., Elena, M. Guerrero-Suástegui, and O. Talavera-Mendoza, The Guerrero composite terrane of western Mexico: Collision and subsequent rifting in a supra-subduction zone. 2008.
- Salinas, P.J., O. Monod, and M. Faure, Ductile deformations of opposite vergence in the eastern part of the Guerrero Terrane (SW Mexico). Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 2000. 13(4-5): p. 389-402. [CrossRef]
- Ortega, G.F. and H. Elías, M. Wholesale melting of the southern Mixteco terrane and origin of the Xolapa Complex [abs.]. in Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program. 2003.
- Ducea, M.N., et al., Geologic evolution of the Xolapa Complex, southern Mexico: Evidence from U-Pb zircon geochronology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2004. 116(7-8): p. 1016-1025. [CrossRef]
- Pérez, G.R., et al., Mesozoic geologic evolution of the Xolapa migmatitic complex north of Acapulco, southern Mexico: implications for paleogeographic reconstructions. Revista mexicana de ciencias geológicas, 2009. 26(1): p. 201-221.
- Corona, C.P., Deformazione, metamorfismo e meccanismi di segregazione migmatitica nel complesso plutonico-metamorfico nel terreno Xolapa, Messico dottorato di ricerca. 1997.
- Ortega, G.F., Metamorphic belts of southern Mexico and their tectonic significance. Geofísica Internacional, 1981. 20(3): p. 177-202. [CrossRef]
- Corona-Chávez, P., S. Poli, and B. Bigioggero, Syn-deformational migmatites and magmatic-arc metamorphism in the Xolapa Complex, southern Mexico. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2006. 24(3): p. 169-191. [CrossRef]
- Morán Zenteno, D.J., Investigaciones isotopicas de RB-Sr y Sm-Nd en rocas cristalinas de la region de Tierra Colorada-Acapulco-Cruz Grande, Estado de Guerrero. 1992.
- Ducea, M.N., et al., Rates of sediment recycling beneath the Acapulco trench: Constraints from (U-Th)/He thermochronology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2005. 109(B9). [CrossRef]
- De Cserna, Z., Reconocimiento geológico en la Sierra Madre del sur de México: entre Chilpancingo y Acapulco, Estado de Guerrero. Vol. 62. 1965: Instituto de Geología, UNAM.
- INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Información topográfica: Carta E14C47 Xaltianguis, escala 1:50 000, Serie III. 2015: Aguascalientes, México.
- INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Información topográfica: Cartas E14C57 y E14C67 Acapulco de Juárez, escala 1:50 000. 2023: Aguascalientes, México.
- INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Censo de Población y Vivienda 2020. 2020: Aguascalientes, México.
- INEGI, I.N.d.E.y.G., Red Nacional de Caminos (RNC). Información de interés nacional, INEGI, Editor. 2024.
- Gobierno del Estado de Guerrero, Plan Director Urbano de la Zona Metropolitana de Acapulco. 2001: Guerrero, México.
- Castillo, E.A.B.A., Iliana Villerías, Análisis espacio–temporal de la transformación urbana de Acapulco 1930-2020. Ciencias Espaciales, 2025. 16(1): p. 25-46. [CrossRef]
- Gervacio, J.H., B.C. Elías, and S.V. Salinas, Huracán Otis en Acapulco, Guerrero: Vulnerabilidad socioeconómica y ambiental ante los impactos del fenómeno hidrometeorológico. 2024: Comunicacion Científica.
- CONAGUA, C.N.d.A., Regiones Hidrológico-Administrativas, CONAGUA, Editor. 2013: México.
- CONAGUA, C.N.d.A., Programa Nacional Hídrico 2020–2024. 2020: Ciudad de México.
- Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. and J.B. Valdés, The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response. Water resources research, 1979. 15(6): p. 1409-1420. [CrossRef]
- Abdo, H.G., Evolving a total-evaluation map of flash flood hazard for hydro-prioritization based on geohydromorphometric parameters and GIS–RS manner in Al-Hussain river basin, Tartous, Syria. Natural Hazards, 2020. 104(1): p. 681-703. [CrossRef]
- Pareta, K. and U. Pareta, Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2011. 2(1): p. 248-269.








| No. | Indicator | Symbol | Equation | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Area (Km2) | A | Basin polygon | [42] |
| 2 | Perimeter (Km) | P | Catchment boundary | [42] |
| 3 | Maximum basin length (Km) | Lb | Basin polygon | [44] |
| 4 | Maximum basin width (Km) | Wb | Basin polygon | [44] |
| 5 | Elongation ratio | Re | [42] | |
| 6 | Form Factor | Ff | [45] |
| No. | Indicator | Symbol | Equation | Reference |
| 7 | Stream order | U | Hierarchical rank | [28] |
| 8 | Number of streams | Nu | [28] | |
| 9 | Total stream length | Tsl | Total length of streams | [38] |
| 10 | Main channel length | Lu | Distance from the channel head to the outlet | [38] |
| 11 | Bifurcation ratio | Rb | [42] | |
| 12 | Stream frequency | Fs | [38] | |
| 13 | Drainage texture | Dt | Dt=Nu/P | [38] |
| 14 | Drainage density | Dd | [38] |
| No. | Indicator | Symbol | Equation | Reference |
| 15 | Maximum elevation | Hmax | DEM | [42] |
| 16 | Minimum elevation | Hmin | DEM | [42] |
| 17 | Basin relief | Er | [28] | |
| 18 | Mean slope | Sm | [42] | |
| 19 | Relief ratio | Rr | [42] |
| Index | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 | S14 | S15 | S16 | S17 | S18 | S19 | S20 | S21 | S22 | S23 | S24 |
| A | 24.2 | 22.7 | 28.4 | 72.7 | 30 | 47.5 | 61.1 | 25.7 | 13.6 | 14.2 | 22.4 | 20.4 | 15.5 | 12.6 | 21.7 | 16.1 | 21.9 | 8 | 5.5 | 13.3 | 12.1 | 3.04 | 5.3 | 9.4 |
| P | 33.7 | 31.8 | 47.5 | 67.3 | 55.5 | 49.4 | 66.2 | 36.4 | 24.6 | 26.7 | 37.1 | 35.2 | 29.7 | 35 | 29.3 | 21.6 | 43.5 | 14.8 | 12.4 | 27.3 | 27.1 | 8.3 | 12.4 | 25.3 |
| Lb | 8.1 | 6.7 | 10.3 | 16.7 | 15.7 | 9.1 | 13.5 | 6.9 | 5.3 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 7.5 | 6.1 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 2.1 | 8.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 1.9 |
| Wb | 3.2 | 6.3 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 8.6 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 3 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 10.2 |
| Re | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.65 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Ff | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| U | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Nu | 809 | 714 | 917 | 2439 | 892 | 1465 | 1923 | 730 | 387 | 374 | 632 | 646 | 509 | 346 | 593 | 413 | 634 | 192 | 102 | 337 | 361 | 67 | 131 | 244 |
| Tls | 125.9 | 116.2 | 136.8 | 391.4 | 149.7 | 233.9 | 316.6 | 128.6 | 62.2 | 70.1 | 108.6 | 109.9 | 78 | 61.3 | 116.7 | 81.7 | 110.1 | 37.6 | 21.8 | 59.6 | 55.1 | 11.8 | 21.3 | 39.2 |
| Lu | 2.9 | 7.4 | 15.4 | 22.7 | 18.8 | 17.2 | 23.8 | 7.8 | 6.4 | 8.7 | 12.3 | 11.4 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 9.4 | 2.3 | 13.3 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 8.2 | 8.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.3 |
| Rb | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 2 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Fs | 33.3 | 31.5 | 32.2 | 33.5 | 29.7 | 30.8 | 31.4 | 28.3 | 28.3 | 26.2 | 28.1 | 31.6 | 32.7 | 27.4 | 27.2 | 25.5 | 28.8 | 23.9 | 18.4 | 25.2 | 29.9 | 22.1 | 24.5 | 25.9 |
| Dt | 23.9 | 22.4 | 19.3 | 36.2 | 16 | 29.6 | 29 | 20 | 15.7 | 14 | 17 | 18.3 | 17 | 9.8 | 20.1 | 19.7 | 14.5 | 12.9 | 8.1 | 12.3 | 13.3 | 8.1 | 10.5 | 9.6 |
| Dd | 5.2 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 5 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 5 | 5 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.1 |
| Hmax | 1142 | 383 | 1468 | 2262 | 1987 | 743 | 1122 | 465 | 607 | 663 | 480 | 430 | 239 | 940 | 860 | 445 | 310 | 320 | 224 | 288 | 164 | 124 | 106 | 103 |
| Hmin | 474 | 941 | 474 | 384 | 376 | 93 | 96 | 33 | 33 | 31 | 23 | 23 | 19 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 18 | 6 |
| Er | 668 | 558 | 994 | 1878 | 1611 | 650 | 1026 | 432 | 574 | 632 | 385 | 407 | 220 | 921 | 845 | 445 | 310 | 320 | 224 | 287 | 164 | 111 | 88 | 97 |
| Sm | 13.3 | 13.21 | 8.9 | 12.5 | 13.6 | 11.9 | 10.9 | 13.4 | 15.5 | 12.9 | 8.1 | 9.3 | 9.1 | 10.8 | 13.3 | 13.9 | 6.2 | 12.8 | 12.1 | 9.2 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 5.9 | 4.3 |
| Rr | 82.4 | 83.2 | 96.5 | 112.5 | 102.6 | 71.43 | 76 | 62.6 | 108.3 | 81.03 | 46.95 | 54.2 | 36 | 112.3 | 104.3 | 211.9 | 37.3 | 78 | 54.6 | 52.1 | 30.9 | 58.4 | 27.5 | 51 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).