Submitted:
23 April 2026
Posted:
27 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Global Research Evidence
1.2. The African Context: Implementation Without Evidence
1.3. South African Research: Building the Evidence Base
1.4. The Research-Implementation Gap
1.5. Framing the Current Study
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design
2.2. Setting and Site Selection
- Glencairn (Setting A): A coastal mountain venue providing a green nature experience with moderate accessibility.
- Sutherland (Setting B): A remote, arid location hosting the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT), selected for its dark sky status and the contrast between the stark landscape and advanced scientific infrastructure.
2.3. Intervention Design: Testing Combinations
2.6. Data Collection Methods
Quantitative Data: Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Qualitative Inquiry: Most Significant Change (MSC)
Qualitative Inquiry: Asynchronous Text-Based Interviews
2.7. Data Collection Procedure
- 3.
- T2 (Post-Intervention): On the final day of the retreat, participants repeated the quantitative measures. Additionally, facilitated focus groups consisting of 6 to 7 participants were conducted.
2.7.1. Focus Group
- 4.
- How did the astronomy activities (e.g., stargazing, cosmic perspective discussions) affect your outlook on life or personal challenges?
- 5.
- What, if anything, surprised you about your experience during the retreat?
2.7.2. Text-based Interviews
- 6.
- Share your thoughts on yesterday when we were all together.
- 7.
- What did you enjoy the most?
- 8.
- What has the weekend done for your family?
- 9.
- How are you feeling after the weekend’s activities?
2.8. Data Analysis
2.8.1. Quantitative Analysis
2.8.2. Qualitative Analysis
2.9. Intervention Components
3. Results
2.4. Participants
- Glencairn Cohort (n=19): Participants were recruited from social, professional and academic networks, including field rangers from Table Mountain National Park, astronomy postgraduates, and psychology students.
- Sutherland Cohort (n=27): Participants comprised nine family groups recruited through Stellenbosch University staff email and advertising internally.
2.5. Data Collection and Analysis3.1. Quantitative Findings
3.2. Qualitative Findings—MSC Focus Groups (Glencairn)
3.2.1. Themes
3.2.1.1. Sense of Calm and Stress Release
“It just kind of slows you down a bit and you get back into your normal rhythm. Instead of being like this, like you’re in a hamster wheel, just going on to the next thing, not dealing with what you actually need to deal with, just keep running away from it”. (male, age if known)—do this for all quotes
3.2.1.2. Enhanced Sense of Community and Connection
3.2.1.3. Expanded Perspective
3.2.1.4. Cultural Significance
3.2.1.5. Personal Understanding
3.3. Qualitative Findings—Text-Based Interviews (Sutherland)
3.3.1. Themes
3.3.1.1. Ideas about Family
3.3.1.2. Importance of History
3.3.1.3. Logistic Issues
3.3.1.4. Mental Restoration
3.3.1.5. Environment Appreciation
4. Discussion

5. Conclusions
5.1. Way Forward
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ART | Attention Restoration Theory |
| MSC | Most Significant Change |
| IAU-OAD | International Astronomical Union’s Office of Astronomy for Development |
| SALT | South African Large Telescope |
| MeerKAT | The South African MeerKAT radio telescope, is a precursor to the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) telescope |
| SKA | Square Kilometre Array |
| TMNP | Table Mountain National Park |
| IDIA | Inter-university Institute for Data Intensive Astronomy |
References
- Kaplan, S. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 1995, 15, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohly, H.; White, M.P.; Wheeler, B.W.; Bethel, A.; Ukoumunne, O.C.; Nikolaou, V.; Garside, R. Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 2016, 19, 305–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vertue, D. The Intersection Between Astronomy and Mental Health. Ment. Health Matters 2022, 9, 29–30. [Google Scholar]
- Keltner, D.; Haidt, J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cogn. Emot. 2003, 17, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Piff, P.K.; Dietze, P.; Feinberg, M.; Stancato, D.M.; Keltner, D. Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2015, 108, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stellar, J.E.; John-Henderson, N.; Anderson, C.L.; Gordon, A.M.; McNeil, G.D.; Keltner, D. Positive affect and markers of inflammation: Discrete positive emotions predict lower levels of inflammatory cytokines. Emotion 2015, 15, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaden, D.B.; Iwry, J.; Slack, K.J.; Eichstaedt, J.C.; Zhao, Y.; Vaillant, G.E.; Newberg, A.B. The overview effect: Awe and self-transcendent experience in space flight. Psychol. Conscious. Theory Res. Pract. 2016, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berman, M.G.; Jonides, J.; Kaplan, S. The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bratman, G.N.; Anderson, C.B.; Berman, M.G.; Cochran, B.; de Vries, S.; Flanders, J.; Folke, C.; Frumkin, H.; Gross, J.J.; Hartig, T.; et al. Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaax0903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnes, C.; Passmore, H.-A. Development and testing of the Night Sky Connectedness Index (NSCI). J. Environ. Psychol. 2024, 93, 102198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gankhuu, E.E.; Amar, T.; Bayarkhuu, B.; Balgan, A. Astronomy for Mental Health and Wellbeing. Bull. AAS 2023, 55. [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka, M.; Otani, K.; Horiuchi, T. Relationship Between Darkness and Healing of Night Sky in Planetarium. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barragan, R.C.; Meltzoff, A.N. Opportunity to view the starry night sky is linked to human emotion and behavioral interest in astronomy. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 19314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herman, A.A.; Stein, D.J.; Seedat, S.; Heeringa, S.G.; Moomal, H.; Williams, D.R. The South African Stress and Health (SASH) study: 12-month and lifetime prevalence of common mental disorders. S Afr. Med. J. 2009, 99, 339–344. [Google Scholar]
- Lund, C.; Petersen, I.; Kleintjes, S.; Bhana, A. Mental Health Services in South Africa: Taking stock. Afr. J. Psychiatry 2012, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pović, M.; Backes, M.; Baki, P.; Baratoux, D.; Tessema, S.B.; Benkhaldoun, Z.; Bode, M.; Klutse, N.A.B.; Charles, P.; Govender, K.; et al. Development in astronomy and space science in Africa. Nat. Astron 2018, 2, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govender, K. Astronomy for African development. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 2011, 260, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mdhluli, J.E.; Takalana, C.; Venugopal, R.; Govender, K.; Hussein, E.; Vertue, D. Astronomy as a strategic driver for sustainable development. Nat. Astron 2025, 9, 936–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendricks, L. Under Southern Skies: How stargazing is shaping mental health research in South Africa | Stellenbosch University. 2025.
- Vertue, D.; Herrera, S. The Astronomy for Mental Health Guidelines: A live document for the community 2023, 21–24.
- Patatanyan, A.; Govender, K.; Herrera, S.B.; Vertue, D.G. ASTRONOMY FOR MENTAL HEALTH GUIDELINES. 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Dart, J.; Davies, R. A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique. Am. J. Eval. 2003, 24, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sh, L. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. In Sydney Psychology Foundation; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Dreyer, Z.; Henn, C.; Hill, C. Validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in a non-clinical sample of South African working adults. In Journal of Psychology in Africa; 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakken, S.A. App-based textual interviews: interacting with younger generations in a digitalized social reality. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2023, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Variable | Combination A: Glencairn (Baseline) | Combination B: Sutherland (Expanded) |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Setting | Green/Coastal: Lush, familiar nature designed to support restoration via soft fascination (ART). | Arid/Stark: Remote, high-contrast landscape offering deep novelty and a profound sense of being away to stimulate reflection. |
| Astronomical Context | Direct Engagement: Stargazing focused purely on the visual experience using naked eye and manual Dobsonian telescopes. | Contextual Contrast: Accessible stargazing (Dobsonians) juxtaposed with a daytime excursion to the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT), grounding the personal viewing experience within the context of Big Science. |
| Social Container | Individual/Peer: Experience focused on individual self-reflection within a loose professional network. | Family Systems: Experience focused on family connection, testing the impact of family cohesion on the restorative process. |
| Measure | Domain Assessed | Setting A: Glencairn (Individual/Peer) | Setting B: Sutherland (Family/High-Tech) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic Questionnaire | Age, gender | Yes | Yes |
| DASS-21 | Depression, Anxiety, Stress (Distress) | Yes | No |
| MSC Focus Groups | Subjective change & perspective | Yes | Yes |
| Asynchronous text-based interview | Personal reflections on family dynamics | No | No |
| Measure | Glencairn (n=19) | Sutherland (n=27) | Total (N=46) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Years) | |||
| 18-25 | 1 (5.3%) | 3 (11.1%) | 3 (11.1%) |
| 26-35 | 10 (52.6%) | 4 (8.7%) | 4 (8.7%) |
| 36-45 | 6 (31.6%) | 3 (11.1%) | 3 (11.1%) |
| 46-55 | 2 (10.53%) | 13 (28.2%) | 13 (28.2%) |
| 55+ | 0 (0%) | 13 (48.2%) | 13 (48.2%) |
| Gender | 19 (41.3%) | 19 (41.3%) | |
| Female | 10 (52.6%) | 3 (11.1%) | 3 (11.1%) |
| Male | 9 (47.4%) | 5 (10.9%) | 5 (10.9%) |
| Pair | Variable | Mean | n | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pair 1 | anxiety_pre | 5.84 | 19 | 3.287 | 0.754 |
| anxiety_post | 2.63 | 19 | 3.004 | 0.689 | |
| Pair 2 | depression_pre | 4.84 | 19 | 3.132 | 0.718 |
| depression_post | 2.47 | 19 | 2.836 | 0.651 | |
| Pair 3 | stress_pre | 8.05 | 19 | 3.951 | 0.906 |
| stress_post | 4.63 | 19 | 4.387 | 1.006 | |
| Pair Comparison | Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | t | df | One-Sided p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pair 1: anxietyT1 − anxietyT2 Pair 2: depressionT1 − depressionT2 Pair 3: stressT1 − stressT2 |
3.211 2.368 3.421 |
4.454 4.323 7.010 |
1.022 .992 1.608 |
3.142 2.388 2.127 |
18 18 18 |
.003 .014 .024 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).