Submitted:
13 April 2026
Posted:
15 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Overview of the Study Area
2.2. Street View Image Acquisition
2.3. Evaluation Metrics for Street Physical Characteristics
2.4. Organismic Perception Assessment Indicators
2.5. Development of the SOR Model
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Assessment Results of Street Physical Characteristics
3.2. Results of Somatic Perception Assessment
3.3. Correlation and Regression Analysis
3.3.1. Correlation Analysis
3.3.2. Regression Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Perceptual Drivers of Physical Space
4.2. Guidelines for Optimizing Micro-Renovation Spaces
4.2.1. Visual Anchors and Color Restoration
4.2.2. Flexible Interfaces and Pedestrian Optimization
4.2.3. Vertical Greening and Targeted Configuration
4.2.4. Meticulous Maintenance and Spatial Openness
5. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, J.; Luo, J.; Deng, T.; Tian, J.; Wang, H. Exploring perceived restoration, landscape perception, and place attachment in historical districts: insights from diverse visitors. Frontiers in Psychology 2023, 14, 1156207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, S.H.G.; Lee, W.H.H.; Tang, B.M.; Chen, Z. Legacy of culture heritage building revitalization: place attachment and culture identity. Frontiers in Psychology 2024, 14, 1314223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cocola-Gant, A. Place-based displacement: Touristification and neighborhood change. Geoforum 2023, 138, 103665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Finn, C.; Liang, P. Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success. ArXiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Zhang, X.; Pun, M.; Liu, M. A Multilevel Multimodal Fusion Transformer for Remote Sensing Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2024, 62, 5600116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, D.; Song, H.; Chen, Q.; Yao, Y.; Ye, X.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gu, J.; Zhao, B.; Wang, D.; Li, X. SpatialVLA: Exploring Spatial Representations for Visual-Language-Action Model. ArXiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, H. Medical image analysis using deep learning algorithms. Frontiers in Public Health 2023, 11, 1273253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pertsch, K.; Stachowicz, K.; Ichter, B.; Driess, D.; Nair, S.; Vuong, Q.; Mees, O.; Finn, C.; Levine, S. FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models. ArXiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, N.; Li, H.; Pan, C.; Wu, J.; Guo, J. The study on the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction, and tourist loyalty at industrial heritage sites. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaccaro, M.; Almaatouq, A.; Malone, T.W. When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour 2024, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Witherspoon, D.P.; White, R.M.B.; Bámaca, M.Y.; Browning, C.R.; Leech, T.G.J.; Leventhal, T.; Matthews, S.A.; Pinchak, N.; Roy, A.L.; Sugie, N.; Winkler, E.N. Place-Based Developmental Research: Conceptual and Methodological Advances in Studying Youth Development in Context. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 2023, 88, 1–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, H.; Huang, P.; Zhang, M.; Tang, W.; Yu, X. CMTFNet: CNN and Multiscale Transformer Fusion Network for Remote-Sensing Image Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2023, 61, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Luo, J. An empirical study on cultural identity measurement and its influence mechanism among heritage tourists. Frontiers in Psychology 2023, 13, 1032672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anwar, M.S.; Yang, J.; Frnda, J.; Choi, A.; Baghaei, N.; Ali, M. Metaverse and XR for cultural heritage education: applications, standards, architecture, and technological insights for enhanced immersive experience. Virtual Reality 2025, 29, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballard, J.L.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Shen, L.; Long, Q. Deep learning-based approaches for multi-omics data integration and analysis. BioData Mining 2024, 17, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afroogh, S.; Akbari, A.; Malone, E.; Kargar, M.; Alambeigi, H. Trust in AI: progress, challenges, and future directions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhong, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chu, R.; Liu, S.; Jia, J. Mini-Gemini: Mining the Potential of Multi-modality Vision Language Models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumert, J.; Becker, M.; Jansen, M.; Köller, O. Cultural Identity and the Academic, Social, and Psychological Adjustment of Adolescents with Immigration Background. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2023, 52, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Xi, Y.; Eweje, F.R.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Bergstrom, C.P.; Gopaulchan, M.; Kim, T.; Yu, K.; Willens, S.H.; Olguin, F.; Nirschl, J.J.; Neal, J.; Diehn, M.; Yang, S.; Li, R. A vision–language foundation model for precision oncology. Nature 2025, 625, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Yuan, G.; Li, J. SFFNet: A Wavelet-Based Spatial and Frequency Domain Fusion Network for Remote Sensing Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2024, 62, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naveed, H.; Khan, A.U.; Qiu, S.; Saqib, M.; Anwar, S.; Usman, M.; Barnes, N.; Mian, A. A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2023, 15, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, A.; Ji, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zou, X.; Kautz, J.; Biyik, E.; Yin, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, X. NaVILA: Legged Robot Vision-Language-Action Model for Navigation. ArXiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Ma, C.; Feng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Tang, J.; Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Zhao, W.X.; Wei, Z.; Wen, J. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science 2024, 18, 186307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osco, L.; Wu, Q.; Lemos, E.L.D.; Gonçalves, W.; Ramos, A.P.; Li, J.; Junior, J.M. The Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Remote Sensing Applications: From Zero to One Shot. ArXiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mzoughi, O.; Yahiaoui, I. Deep learning-based segmentation for disease identification. Ecological Informatics 2023, 75, 102000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiegrebe, S.; Kopper, P.; Sonabend, R.; Bender, A. Deep learning for survival analysis: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review 2024, 57, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thirunavukarasu, A.; Ting, D.S.J.; Elangovan, K.; Gutierrez, L.; Tan, T.F.; Ting, D. Large language models in medicine. Nature Medicine 2023, 29, 1930–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Wang, F.; Shen, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, S. A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 2024, 33, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, X.; Antwi-Afari, M. The applications of Internet of Things (IoT) in industrial management: a science mapping review. International Journal of Production Research 2024, 62, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, T.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, G. Enhancing Multiscale Representations With Transformer for Remote Sensing Image Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2023, 61, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Xu, F.; Yu, A.; Lyu, X.; Gao, H.; Zhou, J. A Frequency Decoupling Network for Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2025, 63, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, H.; Hu, Q.; Zhao, P.; Wang, S.; Ai, M.; Zheng, D.; Liu, T. FTransDeepLab: Multimodal Fusion Transformer-Based DeepLabv3+ for Remote Sensing Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2025, 63, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Han, X.; Deveci, M.; Parmar, M. A review of convolutional neural networks in computer vision. Artificial Intelligence Review 2024, 57, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oladimeji, D.; Gupta, K.; Kose, N.A.; Gundogan, K.; Ge, L.; Liang, F. Smart Transportation: An Overview of Technologies and Applications. Sensors 2023, 23, 3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, J.; Zhou, W.; Yang, R.; Ye, L.; Yu, L. Edge Detection Guide Network for Semantic Segmentation of Remote-Sensing Images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 2023, 20, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, H.; Hong, Y.; Sun, W.; Jia, Y. Deep Dual-Resolution Networks for Real-Time and Accurate Semantic Segmentation of Traffic Scenes. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2023, 24, 3448–3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Chen, C.; Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Wang, Q. Software Testing With Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Vision. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2024, 50, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Chen, D.; Guan, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, J. RemoteCLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model for Remote Sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2024, 62, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, A.; Dao, T. Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces. ArXiv 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, H.; Wu, J.; Pan, Q.; Guan, X.; Guizani, M. A Survey on Digital Twin for Industrial Internet of Things: Applications, Technologies and Tools. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2023, 25, 2038–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bail, C.A. Can Generative AI improve social science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2024, 121, e2314021121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arafin, P.; Billah, A.M.; Issa, A. Deep learning-based concrete defects classification and detection using semantic segmentation. Structural Health Monitoring 2023, 23, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, Q.; Cai, Y.; Fang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Chen, C.; Fan, L.; Nguyen, A. Samba: Semantic segmentation of remotely sensed images with state space model. Heliyon 2024, 10, e38495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Huang, J.; Jin, S.; Lu, S. Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2024, 46, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Pun, M.; Huang, B. SAM-Assisted Remote Sensing Imagery Semantic Segmentation With Object and Boundary Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2024, 62, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verdecchia, R.; Sallou, J.; Cruz, L. A systematic review of Green AI. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2023, 13, e1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Lai, A.; Thygesen, J.; Farrington, J.; Keen, T.; Li, K. Large Language Models for Mental Health Applications: Systematic Review. JMIR Mental Health 2024, 11, e57400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, X.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Wang, K.; Li, L.; Luo, X.; Lo, D.; Grundy, J.C. Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 2024, 33, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawaharazuka, K.; Oh, J.; Yamada, J.; Posner, I.; Zhu, Y. Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotics: A Review Towards Real-World Applications. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Xue, E. Dynamic Interaction between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. Behavioral Sciences 2023, 13, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Li, X.; Du, J.; Cheng, C. Exploring the Relationship between Urban Street Spatial Patterns and Street Vitality: A Case Study of Guiyang, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023, 20, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, B.; Geng, J.; Ke, S.; Pan, H. Analysis of spatial variation of street landscape greening and influencing factors: an example from Fuzhou city, China. Scientific Reports 2023, 13, 14811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Zhu, J. Can Subjective Perception Objectively Explain Street Vitality? Buildings 2024, 14, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, X.; Tang, L.; You, C.; Chen, X. Evaluating public spaces: Measuring spatial quality of urban streets and its effect on built environment vitality. Frontiers in Public Health 2023, 11, 1119561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, J.; Ishak, N.A.; Qin, Y. The application of Moore’s online learning interactions model in learning outcomes: The SOR (stimulus-organism-response) paradigm perspective. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Liang, X. Examining how rural revitalization features influence visitors’ behavioral intentions. Frontiers in Psychology 2023, 14, 1130635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, W.; Wei, Z.; Jia, N. Visual perception and landscape elements of urban neighborhood block based on image segmentation and random forest: A case of Tianjin, China. Ecological Informatics 2024, 80, 102377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; Wang, S. Exploring the impact of AI-enhanced virtual tourism on Tourists’ pro-environmental behavior: A stimulus-organism-response model perspective. Acta psychologica 2025, 253, 104773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Liu, B. Emotional perception on the characteristics of traditional villages: A stimulus-organism-response approach. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Luo, M.; Hu, B. Role of Place Identity in the Visual Perception of Local Residents in a Rapidly Developing Rural Landscape: A Case of Suburban Beijing. Land 2023, 12, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurdin, N.; Oemar, F.; Suhadak, S. The Impact of Halal Destination Image on Revisit Intention with Islamic Value as a Moderating: The Case of West Sumatra Province in Indonesia. Quality - Access to Success 2023, 24, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Y.X.; Chae, S.W.; Xiang, Y.C. How social and media cues induce live streaming impulse buying? SOR model perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 2024, 15, 1352458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhaolong, G.; Wang, W. Effect Mechanism of Destination Local Cultural Attributes on Tourists’ Pro-Environmental Behavior. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guojiang, P.; Sun, Y.; Ye, G.; He, K.; Ye, G. Measuring psychological perceptions to built environment along waterfronts based on multi-task CNN. Scientific Reports 2023, 13, 38012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levavi, L.R.; Friedmann, E.; Kalagy, T.; Cohen, C. Applying the SOR framework to mitigate single-use plastic tableware consumption and why does it work? Solving the dissonance with an extended SOR framework. Journal of environmental management 2023, 344, 118941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mladenović, D.; Todua, N.; Pavlović-Höck, N. Understanding individual psychological and behavioral responses during COVID-19: Application of stimulus-organism-response model. Telematics and Informatics 2023, 82, 101994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, F.; Jiang, Q.; Du, X.; Han, Y.; Yang, D. Restorative assessment of natural and built environments in campuses based on the combination of continuous physiological signals and self-reports. Indoor and Built Environment 2023, 32, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Song, C.; Sun, P. Visualizing Urban Vitality: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Li, Y. Built Environmental Features and Street Vitality from the Perspective of Elderly Walking Trips. Buildings 2024, 14, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, R.; Han, B. Association between objective and subjective characteristics of the built environment and human stress response: A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2024, 92, 128362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; Xu, F. A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Spatial Visual Behavior Based on Landscape Characteristics in High-Density Environments. Land 2024, 13, 1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, R.; Wu, Y.; Xiao, F.; Zhang, X. Influence Mechanism and Intervention Strategies for Micro-Renewal on Community Vitality in Historic and Cultural Blocks: An Empirical Study of Guancheng. Buildings 2024, 14, 3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, W.; Peng, C. Measurement and analysis of spatial vitality in comprehensive park based on multisource data fusion: A case study of Shuxiang Park in Chengdu. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2023, 11, 1130835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Tang, J.; Luo, H.; Ge, C. Spatial Vitality Dynamics and Influencing Factors of Waterfront Public Spaces: A Case Study of Shanghai’s Suzhou Creek. Land 2024, 13, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, L.; Shen, C.; Wu, Z.; Qiong, H.; He, R. Exploring spatial equity of urban public space with multisource data: A conceptual framework and a case study. Frontiers in Public Health 2023, 11, 1102509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q. Built Environmental Correlates of the Commute Behavior among Shared Micromobility Users: A Spatiotemporal Modeling Approach. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2023, 2023, 1569300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.; Shi, S.; Li, J.; Yan, Z. The association between built environment attributes and self-reported emotional reactions to large-scale, extreme weather events. Health & place 2023, 83, 103099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Song, Q.; Guo, S.; Li, B. Effects of color characteristics of urban forest landscape on human physiological and psychological relaxation. Frontiers in Public Health 2023, 11, 1203024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, K.; Wang, S.; Ding, L.; He, S.; Qu, J. The Correlation between Multi-Dimensional Natural Environmental Features and Attention Restoration of the Aging Population: A Path Analysis Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023, 20, 2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; He, J. Research and Implementation on Feature Perception Model and Color Image Design Method of Modern Local Landscape Environment in Deep Learning Era. Scientific Programming 2023, 2023, 6744883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nian, J.; Hu, X.; Wu, S. Study on landscape satisfaction, psychological benefit, and vitality of forest parks. Frontiers in Psychology 2023, 13, 1068800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, M.; Zhou, L.; Wang, X. Measurement and Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Urban Spatial Vitality: A Case Study of Historic Commercial Areas in Central Beijing, China. Buildings 2023, 13, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Gao, X.; Shi, X.; Sun, J. Assessment of building morphological characteristics and their associations with microclimate on a campus in severe cold region: A case study of Harbin Institute of Technology. Sustainable Cities and Society 2024, 102, 105494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, H.; Huang, Z. Assessing Spatiotemporal Morphology and Influencing Factors of Urban Street Vitality Based on POI and LBS Data. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Du, X.; Cui, S. A Machine-Learning Based Method for Evaluating Street Features and Its Relevance on Housing Prices: A Case Study of Tianjin. Buildings 2023, 13, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Liu, B. The Relationship Between the Local Climate Zone, Thermal Environment, and Neighborhood Vitality at the Block Level. Buildings 2024, 14, 2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Cao, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, X. The Effects of Street Spatial Form on Temperature and Built-Environment Quality Analysis Using Google Street View Images in a High-Density City: A Case Study of Chengdu. Buildings 2024, 14, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Wang, X.; Tian, Z.; Yin, J. Effects of physical activities and built environment on thermal comfort in dynamic urban outdoor environments. Building and Environment 2023, 238, 110292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, R.; Fang, L.; Xu, L.; Ji, C. The Relationship Analysis of Block Scale and Spatial Vitality—Taking 12 Commercial Streets in Guangzhou as Examples. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.; Feng, J.; Zhou, Q. Effect mechanism of block morphological characteristics on local temperature: A study based on Local Climate Zone (LCZ) classification framework. Ecological Informatics 2023, 77, 102220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, C.; Lin, W.; Zhou, Q.; Zhai, Z. Study on the Association between Multi-Scale Urban Morphology and Land Surface Temperature of Wuhan based on High-Resolution Data. Sustainable Cities and Society 2024, 102, 105459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, B.; Jiao, M.; Li, D.; Zhang, T.; Liu, L. Built Environment Attributes and Walking Vitality: High-Resolution Spatial Models Using Real-World Pedestrian Trajectories. Tsinghua Science and Technology 2024, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, F.; Sun, Z.; Yin, J. Exploring street vitality using Wi-Fi location and street view data: a case study of Wuhan. GIScience & Remote Sensing 2024, 61, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venter, Z.; Hassani, A.; Stange, E.; Schneider, P.; Castell, N. Reassessing the role of urban green space in air pollution control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2024, 121, e2306200121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahir, Z.; Haseeb, M.; Mahmood, S.A.; Batool, S.; Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M.; Ullah, S.; Tariq, A. Predicting land use and land cover changes for sustainable land management using CA-Markov modelling and GIS techniques. Scientific Reports 2025, 15, 87796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jo, H.; Lee, J.; Lee, Y.; Choo, S. Generative artificial intelligence and building design: early photorealistic render visualization of façades using local identity-trained models. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 2024, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores, B.; Montoya, E.; Sakschewski, B.; Nascimento, N.; Staal, A.; Betts, R.A.; Levis, C.; Lapola, D.; Esquível-Muelbert, A.; Jakovac, C.C.; Nobre, C.A.; Oliveira, R.S.; Borma, L.; Nian, D.; Boers, N.; Hecht, S.B.; Steege, H.t.; Arieira, J.; Lucas, I.L.; Berenguer, E.; Marengo, J.; Gatti, L.V.; Mattos, C.R.; Hirota, M. Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system. Nature 2024, 626, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hou, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, H. Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directions. ArXiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Arcot, Y.; Medina, R.F.; Bernal, J.S.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Akbulut, M.E.S. Integrated Pest Management: An Update on the Sustainability Approach to Crop Protection. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Araby, R. Biofuel production: exploring renewable energy solutions for a greener future. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts 2024, 17, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Z.; Ahmad, M.N.; Javed, A. Comparison of Random Forest and XGBoost Classifiers Using Integrated Optical and SAR Features for Mapping Urban Impervious Surface. Remote Sensing 2024, 16, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boeing, G. Modeling and Analyzing Urban Networks and Amenities with OSMnx. Geographical Analysis 2025, 57, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, L.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, L.; Cao, W.; Ma, J. Research on object detection and recognition in remote sensing images based on YOLOv11. Scientific Reports 2025, 15, 96314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trepel, J.; Roux, E.l.; Abraham, A.J.; Buitenwerf, R.; Kamp, J.; Kristensen, J.; Tietje, M.; Lundgren, E.J.; Svenning, J. Meta-analysis shows that wild large herbivores shape ecosystem properties and promote spatial heterogeneity. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2024, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Priyadarshana, T.; Martin, E.A.; Sirami, C.; Woodcock, B.; Goodale, E.; Martínez-Núñez, C.; Lee, M.; Pagani-Núñez, E.; Raderschall, C.A.; Brotons, L.; Rege, A.; Ouin, A.; Tscharntke, T.; Slade, E.M. Crop and landscape heterogeneity increase biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: A global review and meta-analysis. Ecology letters 2024, 27, e14412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, H.; Pang, B.; Bai, P.; Zhao, G.; Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, M. Flood Susceptibility Assessment with Random Sampling Strategy in Ensemble Learning (RF and XGBoost). Remote Sensing 2024, 16, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadd, G.M.; Fomina, M.; Pinzari, F. Fungal biodeterioration and preservation of cultural heritage, artwork, and historical artifacts: extremophily and adaptation. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 2024, 88, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Cui, Z.; Fan, T.; Ruan, S.; Wu, J. Spatial distribution of intangible cultural heritage resources in China and its influencing factors. Scientific Reports 2024, 14, 55454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siino, M.; Falco, M.; Croce, D.; Rosso, P. Exploring LLMs Applications in Law: A Literature Review on Current Legal NLP Approaches. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, S.; Li, Y.; Stein, A.; Yang, S.; Jia, P. Street view imagery-based built environment auditing tools: a systematic review. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2024, 38, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLeod, L.; Kitson, J.C.; Dorner, Z.; Tassell-Matamua, N.A.; Stahlmann-Brown, P.; Milfont, T.; Hine, D.W. Environmental stewardship: A systematic scoping review. PLOS ONE 2024, 19, e0284255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsoulakis, E.; Wang, Q.; Wu, H.; Shahriyari, L.; Fletcher, R.; Liu, J.; Achenie, L.; Liu, H.; Jackson, P.; Xiao, Y.; Syeda-Mahmood, T.F.; Tuli, R.; Deng, J. Digital twins for health: a scoping review. NPJ Digital Medicine 2024, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Qu, D.; Song, H.; Chen, Q.; Yao, Y.; Ye, X.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gu, J.; Zhao, B.; Wang, D.; Li, X. SpatialVLA: Exploring Spatial Representations for Visual-Language-Action Model. ArXiv 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alegbe, E.O.; Uthman, T. A review of history, properties, classification, applications and challenges of natural and synthetic dyes. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]









| Block Characteristics | Formula | Expression Description | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenery Coverage Ratio | Represents the proportion of pixels occupied by trees, grass, and plants. | Refers to the ratio of tree, plant, and grass pixels to the total number of pixels. | |
| Openness | Represents the proportion of sky pixels. | Refers to the degree of openness in street spaces. | |
| Enclosure | Represents the proportion of pixels occupied by walls, buildings, and trees. | Indicates the extent to which a street | |
| Walkable space | Represents the proportion of sidewalk pixels. | Refers to the ratio of sidewalk pixels to total pixels | |
| Cultural Visual Identity | Represents the proportion of pixels containing cultural elements. | Refers to the ratio of elements with unique cultural characteristics to the total number of pixels | |
| Street Cleanliness | Represents the proportion of pixels depicting litter, graffiti, and debris. | Reflects the level of cleanliness in the street environment | |
| Landscape Diversity Index | Represents the proportion of landscape element i within the entire community. | Indicates the richness of landscape elements observable on the street. | |
| Environmental Color Diversity | Represents the number of pixels of the jth color in the ith image, where J denotes the total number of environmental colors in the ith image. | Refers to the richness of environmental colors observable on the street. |
| Evaluation Dimension | Evaluation Indicator | Descriptive Adjectives | Academic Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spatial Visual Perception | Sense of spatial scale |
Clustered - Open | Measures the perceived sense of enclosure or openness created by physical boundaries. |
| Sense of Visual Order | Cluttered - Neat | Evaluates the perceived order, visual continuity, and overall harmony of environmental elements. | |
| Spatial Richness | Monotonous - Rich | Measures sensory satisfaction regarding the space’s details, material textures, and color diversity. | |
| Perceived Environmental Comfort | Physical Comfort | Uncomfortable–Pleasant | Reflects visitors’ overall physiological and psychological comfort within the micro-environment. |
| Pedestrian Safety | Dangerous–Safe | Measures the psychological sense of safety regarding the pedestrian environment and spatial defensibility. | |
| Wayfinding Clarity | Confused–Clear | Assesses how easily visitors can orient themselves and navigate the street network. | |
| Perceived Emotional Arousal | Emotional Pleasure | Dull - Pleasant | Represents the pleasure and positive emotions visitors experience from environmental stimuli. |
| Neural arousal | Boring–Interesting | Measures the sensory stimulation and emotional engagement evoked by the neighborhood’s cultural and commercial vitality. | |
| Psychological Relaxation | Tense-Relaxed | Reflects the degree to which the environment helps visitors relax and restore mental attention. | |
| Perception of Cultural Identity | Cultural Authenticity | Artificial - Historical | Measures visitors’ identification with the authenticity of the district’s historical and cultural features. |
| Sense of Place Attachment | Distant-Intimate | Evaluates the emotional bond and deep sense of belonging visitors establish with the space. | |
| Overall Appeal | Ordinary–Eye-catching | A holistic assessment of the neighborhood’s overall spatial quality, culture, and sense of place. |
| Block Features | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of Image Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Green Rate | 0.112 | 0.075 | 413 |
| Openness | 0.135 | 0.063 | 413 |
| Enclosure Ratio | 1.524 | 0.583 | 413 |
| Walkable space | 0.385 | 0.106 | 413 |
| Cultural Visual Recognition | 0.315 | 0.094 | 413 |
| Street Cleanliness | 0.883 | 0.021 | 413 |
| Landscape Diversity Index | 1.842 | 0.415 | 413 |
| Environmental Color Diversity | 0.734 | 0.128 | 413 |
| Evaluation Dimension | Evaluation Indicator | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of Image Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spatial Visual Perception | Sense of spatial scale | 1.15 | 0.82 | 413 |
| Sense of visual order | 1.48 | 0.65 | 413 | |
| Spatial Richness | 1.76 | 0.73 | 413 | |
| Perceived Environmental Comfort |
Physical comfort | 0.85 | 0.98 | 413 |
| Pedestrian Safety | 2.12 | 0.54 | 413 | |
| Wayfinding Clarity | 1.34 | 0.77 | 413 | |
| Perceived Emotional Arousal |
Emotional Pleasantness | 1.68 | 0.69 | 413 |
| Neural arousal | 1.55 | 0.75 | 413 | |
| Psychological Relaxation | 0.62 | 1.05 | 413 | |
| Perceived Cultural Identity |
Cultural Authenticity | 0.95 | 0.88 | 413 |
| Sense of Place Attachment | 1.08 | 0.92 | 413 | |
| Overall Attractiveness | 1.85 | 0.66 | 413 |
| Model | Variable | Unstandardized B | Std. Error | Standardized Beta | t | Sig. | VIF | R2 | F. Sig |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spatial Visual Perception | (constant) | 0.842 | 0.125 | - | 0.000 | 1.000 | - | 0.485 | 0.000 |
| Cultural Visual Recognition | 1.256 | 0.184 | 0.352 | 6.826 | 0.000 | 1.254 | |||
| Landscape Diversity Index | 0.658 | 0.112 | 0.284 | 5.875 | 0.001 | 1.342 | |||
| Environmental Color Diversity | 0.845 | 0.176 | 0.215 | 4.801 | 0.007 | 1.288 | |||
| Perceived environmental comfort | (constant) | 1.156 | 0.142 | - | 0.000 | 1.000 | - | 0.426 | 0.000 |
| Green View Rate | 1.854 | 0.265 | 0.318 | 6.996 | 0.000 | 1.185 | |||
| Walkable space | 1.246 | 0.218 | 0.265 | 5.716 | 0.001 | 1.102 | |||
| Street Cleanliness | 0.985 | 0.245 | 0.182 | 4.020 | 0.020 | 1.056 | |||
| Enclosure ratio | -0.428 | 0.126 | -0.154 | -3.397 | 0.007 | 1.214 | |||
| Emotional arousal perception | (constant) | 0.624 | 0.158 | - | 0.000 | 1.000 | - | 0.462 | 0.000 |
| Environmental Color Diversity | 1.542 | 0.214 | 0.345 | 7.206 | 0.000 | 1.312 | |||
| Enclosure ratio | 0.865 | 0.145 | 0.276 | 5.966 | 0.001 | 1.158 | |||
| Openness | -0.654 | 0.212 | -0.142 | -3.085 | 0.012 | 1.095 | |||
| Perceived cultural identity | (constant) | 0.415 | 0.136 | - | 0.000 | 1.000 | - | 0.514 | 0.000 |
| Cultural Visual Recognition | 1.685 | 0.188 | 0.412 | 8.963 | 0.000 | 1.165 | |||
| Enclosure ratio | 0.742 | 0.142 | 0.228 | 5.225 | 0.004 | 1.205 | |||
| Landscape Diversity Index | 0.426 | 0.125 | 0.156 | 3.408 | 0.010 | 1.328 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).