Submitted:
04 June 2026
Posted:
05 June 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction and Main Results
| Layer | Output | Status |
| Alena gauge-branch selection | The Hilbert-Belinfante compatible current-residual sector supplies separated current and stress-response coefficient labels. After the scalar singlet is removed, these labels give the and source channels. | Sufficient local selection mechanism; recorded in Section 2. |
| Carrier rigidity | The primitive link, the Borel-Weil tower, and the order- non-scalar source select the minimal separated support (7). | Main local theorem; proved in Section 4. |
| Finite representation package | The selected Hermitian carrier spaces and the unimodular top-form constraint give the carrier-basis group (8); the exterior package gives the standard one-generation representation content. | Finite representation consequence; recorded in Section 5. |
| Central family response | The coefficient reduction (9) gives a central family-response torsor. In the unblocked response, the phase and shift directions generate . | Algebraic response datum; Berry-Wilczek-Zee response is conditional on Schur visibility. |
| Analytic representative | A Callias-Schur gap represents the selected support by an isolated low-sector bundle with Berry-Wilczek-Zee connection. | Conditional on the analytic gap and subcritical Schur bound. |
| Primitive benchmark | The neutral Schur cell gives a finite diagnostic after the primitive scalar unit has been fixed. | Appendix D; not used in the carrier theorem. |
| Closed spectral data | Yukawa operators, fermion masses, CKM and PMNS data, thresholds, and running are assigned to the completed branch. | Not fixed by the local filtered link cycle. |
| Reading | Output | Status |
| Closed-observable reading | The branch is treated as a primitive local representative of the self-reconstruction loop (1); the selected finite sector is an isolated Schur block of the closed observable algebra. | Guiding principle; only the local link reduction is used. |
| Rainich-current residual reading | The split-conserved residual scalar gives separated current and Codazzi traces; after the scalar singlet is removed, the order- source has only the and non-scalar two-jet types. | Propositions 6, 3, and 7. |
| Optical Codazzi reading | The two-eigenvalue Codazzi branch gives the projective link after real blow-up of the worldline defect. | Local Codazzi consequence. |
| Primitive topological reading | The simple positive transverse-frame class gives and the class ; the nonzero link class obstructs smooth filling of the normal ball. | Primitive sector and clutching. |
| Equivariant index reading | The twisted link Dirac operators give the Borel-Weil tower (3). | Standard link index. |
| Filtered source reading | The non-scalar two-jet gives the and channels of (4). | Two-channel generic stratum. |
| Toeplitz support reading | The visibility rule (6) gives the separated support (7). | Carrier rigidity theorem. |
| Finite algebraic reading | The carrier (7) gives and the one-generation exterior package. | Representation-theoretic consequence. |
| Coefficient reading | The reduction (9) gives the central family-response torsor. | Coefficient reduction. |
| Analytic and differential reading | The Callias-Schur gap gives an isolated low-sector representative, and its regular family carries the Berry-Wilczek-Zee connection. | Conditional on the analytic gap. |
| Global reading | The closed branch completion is organized by a Kuranishi obstruction map; flavor eigenvalues, thresholds, running, and non-circulant response data are closed spectral data. | Completed branch problem. |
2. Alena-Type Residual Lagrangians
- 1.
- its transverse degree is one on the linking spheres, with positive orientation;
- 2.
- the residual sector is closed split-conserved in the sense of Definition 2;
- 3.
- the residual scalar is an admissible Codazzi multiplier in the sense of Proposition 4;
- 4.
- the penalty-dominant limit gives a Codazzi-closed two-eigenvalue optical branch with nonzero Codazzi gap on the frozen collar.
3. From Codazzi to the Primitive Link Cycle
3.1. Optical Codazzi Input and Projective Link
3.2. Blow-up, Primitive Line, and the Unfiltered Link Cycle
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- the resolved oriented transverse frame is simple and positive in the sense of Lemma 2.
4. The Filtered Equivariant Index and Primitive Low-Carrier Rigidity
4.1. Filtered Source Symbol
4.2. Toeplitz Support and Carrier Rigidity
| Input sector | channel | channel | Selected separated support |
| , | first on | first on | |
| , | first on | absent | |
| , | absent | first on | |
| , | absent | absent | no non-scalar low carrier |
| principal , | absent at principal order | absent at principal order | high-sector data |
| degree link | altered tower | altered tower | non-primitive link sector |
4.3. Support Refinement and Analytic Separation
5. The Finite Standard-Model Package
5.1. Exterior Representation Package
5.2. Central Coefficient Shadow
5.3. Neutral Schur Cell
6. Analytic Representative and Global Response
Primitive protection and analytic isolation.
6.1. Callias-Schur Isolation
6.2. Family Response and Berry-Wilczek-Zee Connection
6.3. Self-Describing Branch Synthesis
6.4. Kuranishi Completion and Closed Spectral Data
7. Conclusions and Discussion
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Use of Artificial Intelligence
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Optical Codazzi and the Primitive Link
Codazzi components.
Optical consequence.
Real blow-up and local topology.
Primitive clutching.
Appendix B. Normal Operator, Callias-Schur Estimate, and BWZ Variation
Appendix C. Exterior Package and Anomaly Bookkeeping
| Class | Representative | Status |
| up-type Dirac channel | neutral one-Higgs channel | |
| down-type Dirac channel | neutral one-Higgs channel | |
| charged-lepton Dirac channel | neutral one-Higgs channel | |
| neutrino Dirac channel | neutral one-Higgs channel | |
| singlet Majorana channel | representation-theoretically neutral | |
| active Majorana bilinear | not neutral as a local bilinear | |
| active Majorana invariant | first neutral active Majorana class | |
| baryon-violating contacts | , | four-fermion effective classes |
Appendix D. Neutral Schur Cell and Primitive Benchmark
Appendix D.1. Primitive Chern-Weil Normalization
Appendix D.2. Neutral-Cell Diagnostic
Appendix D.3. Sensitivity to the Scalar Unit
Appendix D.4. Primitive Collar Scale Diagnostic
Appendix D.5. Degree Comparison
Appendix E. Thin-Core Alena Collars and Kuranishi Completion
- (i)
- the limiting integral current has primitive multiplicity one and gives the simple positive transverse class of Definition 4;
- (ii)
- (iii)
- the frozen residual response is closed split-conserved in the sense of (14);
- (iv)
- the scalar multiplier condition of Proposition 4 holds on the non-degenerate collar set;
- (v)
- the penalty-dominant limit satisfies the Codazzi closure of Lemma A6;
- (vi)
- the limiting two-eigenvalue branch has a nonzero Codazzi gap on the frozen collar;
- (vii)
- the current-built coefficients of (19) are nonzero.
References
- Hélein, F. Dynamical mechanisms for Kaluza–Klein theories. Lett. Math. Phys. 2022, arXiv:math112, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cariglia, M.; Alves, F.K. The Eisenhart lift: a didactical introduction of modern geometrical concepts from Hamiltonian dynamics. Eur. J. Phys. 2015, arXiv:math36, 025018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, J.E.G. A field theory in Randers–Finsler spacetime. EPL 2021, arXiv:hep133, 21002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czuchry, E.; Gazeau, J.P. Finite-resolution measurement induces topological curvature defects in spacetime. arXiv 2026, arXiv:gr. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogonowski, P.; Skindzier, P. Alena Tensor in unification applications. Phys. Scr. 2024, 100, 015018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogonowski, P. The halo effect and quantum vortices. Not so dark with Alena Tensor. Phys. Scr. 2026, 101, 155002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogonowski, P. Developed method: interactions and their quantum picture. Front. Phys. 2023, 11, 1264925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogonowski, P. Proposed method of combining continuum mechanics with Einstein Field Equations. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D. 2023, 32, 2350010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogonowski, P. Gravitational waves and Higgs-like potential from Alena Tensor. Phys. Scr. 2025, 100, 105026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rainich, G.Y. Electrodynamics in the General Relativity Theory. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1925, 27, 106–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrando, J.J.; Sáez, J.A. Rainich Theory for Type D Aligned Einstein–Maxwell Solutions. General. Relativ. Gravit. 2007, 39, 2039–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penrose, R.; Rindler, W. Spinors and Space-Time. Volume 1: Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, R.S.; Wells, Raymond O.; J. Twistor Geometry and Field Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woit, P. Euclidean Twistor Unification. arXiv 2021, arXiv:hep. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, T.T.; Yang, C.N. Dirac Monopole Without Strings: Monopole Harmonics. Nucl. Phys. B 1976, 107, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jante, R.; Schroers, B.J. Dirac Operators on the Taub–NUT Space, Monopoles and SU(2) Representations. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 2014, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bott, R. Homogeneous Vector Bundles. Ann. Math. 1957, 66, 203–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fulton, W.; Harris, J. Representation Theory: A First Course; Vol. 129, Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer: New York, NY, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atiyah, M.F.; Singer, I.M. The Index of Elliptic Operators. I. Ann. Math. 1968, 87, 484–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atiyah, M.F.; Bott, R.; Shapiro, A. Clifford Modules. Topology 1964, 3, 3–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freed, D.S.; Lott, J. An index theorem in differential K-theory. Geom. Topol. 2010, 14, 903–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bismut, J.M.; Freed, D.S. The analysis of elliptic families. II. Dirac operators, eta invariants, and the holonomy theorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 1986, 107, 103–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bordemann, M.; Meinrenken, E.; Schlichenmaier, M. Toeplitz quantization of Kähler manifolds and gl(N), N→∞ limits. Commun. Math. Phys. 1994, 165, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexanian, G.; Pinzul, A.; Stern, A. Generalized coherent state approach to star products and applications to the fuzzy sphere. Nucl. Phys. B 2001, 600, 531–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sämann, C.; Szabo, R.J. Branes, Quantization and Fuzzy Spheres. Proc. Sci. 2010, arXiv:hepCNCFG2010, 005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baez, J.C.; Huerta, J. The Algebra of Grand Unified Theories. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 2010, 47, 483–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoica, O.C. Leptons, Quarks, and Gauge from the Complex Clifford Algebra Cℓ6. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr. 2018, 28, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gresnigt, N.G. The Standard Model Particle Content with Complete Gauge Symmetries from the Minimal Ideals of Two Clifford Algebras. Eur. Phys. J. C 2020, 80, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connes, A.; Lott, J. Particle Models and Noncommutative Geometry. Nucl. Phys. B-Proc. Suppl. 1991, 18, 29–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamseddine, A.H.; Connes, A. The Spectral Action Principle. Commun. Math. Phys. 1997, arXiv:hep186, 731–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamseddine, A.H.; Connes, A.; van Suijlekom, W.D. Noncommutativity and Physics: A Non-Technical Review. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2023, 232, 3581–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besnard, F.; Brouder, C. Noncommutative geometry, the Lorentzian Standard Model and its B-L extension. Phys. Rev. D. 2021, 103, 035003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atiyah, M.F.; Manton, N.S.; Schroers, B.J. Geometric Models of Matter. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2012, arXiv:hep468, 1252–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnov, K. Fermions, Differential Forms and Doubled Geometry. Nucl. Phys. B 2018, arXiv:hep936, 36–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callias, C. Axial anomalies and index theorems on open spaces. Commun. Math. Phys. 1978, 62, 213–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anghel, N. On the index of Callias-type operators. Geom. Funct. Anal. 1993, 3, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berry, M.V. Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1984, 392, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilczek, F.; Zee, A. Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 52, 2111–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, D. Gauge Theory, 2018; Lecture notes, University of Cambridge.
- Jost, J.; Keßler, E.; Wu, R.; Zhu, M. Geometric analysis of the Yang–Mills–Higgs–Dirac model. J. Geom. Phys. 2022, arXiv:math182, 104669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, S.M. Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity, 2 ed.; Cambridge University Press, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Moruno, P.; Visser, M. Generalized Rainich Conditions, Generalized Stress-Energy Conditions, and the Hawking–Ellis Classification. Class. Quantum Gravity 2017, 34, 225014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plebański, J.F. On the separation of Einsteinian substructures. J. Math. Phys. 1977, 18, 2511–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbantke, H. On integrability properties of SU(2) Yang–Mills fields. I. Infinitesimal part. J. Math. Phys. 1984, 25, 2321–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derdziński, A.; Shen, C.L. Codazzi Tensor Fields, Curvature and Pontryagin Forms. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1983, 47, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mantica, C.A.; Molinari, L.G. Codazzi Tensors and Their Space-Times, and Cotton Gravity. General. Relativ. Gravit. 2023, 55, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coll, B.; Ferrando, J.J.; Sáez, J.A. On the Geometry of Killing and Conformal Tensors. J. Math. Phys. 2006, 47, 062503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrando, J.J.; Sáez, J.A. On the Space-Times Admitting Two Shear-Free Geodesic Null Congruences. General. Relativ. Gravit. 2007, 39, 343–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besse, A.L. Einstein Manifolds. In Classics in Mathematics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, S.; Nomizu, K. Foundations of Differential Geometry. Volume II; Interscience Publishers: New York, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Penrose, R.; Rindler, W. Spinors and Space-Time. Volume 2: Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-Time Geometry; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mason, L.J.; Woodhouse, N.M.J. Integrability, Self-Duality, and Twistor Theory; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uhlenbeck, K.K. Removable Singularities in Yang–Mills Fields. Commun. Math. Phys. 1982, 83, 11–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbarg, D.; Trudinger, N.S. Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order. In Classics in Mathematics, Reprint of the 1998 edition, 2 ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varshalovich, D.A.; Moskalev, A.N.; Khersonskii, V.K. Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum; World Scientific: Singapore, 1988; p. 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorne, K.S. Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1980, 52, 299–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawson, H.B.; Michelsohn, M.L. Spin Geometry. In Princeton Mathematical Series; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1989; Vol. 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seeley, R.T. Conic Degeneration of the Dirac Operator. Colloq. Math. 1990, 60/61, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seeley, R.T. Singular Integrals and Boundary Value Problems. Am. J. Math. 1966, 88, 781–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grubb, G. Functional Calculus of Pseudodifferential Boundary Problems. In Progress in Mathematics, 2 ed.; Birkhäuser Boston: Boston, MA, 1996; Vol. 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aharonov, Y.; Casher, A. Ground State of a Spin-12 Charged Particle in a Two-Dimensional Magnetic Field. Phys. Rev. A 1979, 19, 2461–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woit, P. Spacetime is Right-handed. arXiv 2023, arXiv:hep. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atiyah, M.F.; Hitchin, N.J.; Singer, I.M. Self-duality in four-dimensional Riemannian geometry. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A 1978, 362, 425–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilge, A.H.; Özdemir, F. The geometry of self-dual two-forms. J. Math. Phys. 1997, 38, 4804–4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnov, K. Pure connection action principle for general relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 251103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnov, K. Formulations of General Relativity: Gravity, Spinors and Differential Forms; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Krasnov, K. A Gauge-Theoretic Approach to Gravity. Proc. R. Soc. A 2012, 468, 2129–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnov, K.; Skvortsov, E. Flat self-dual gravity. J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 2021, 082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doplicher, S.; Roberts, J.E. Why there is a field algebra with a compact gauge group describing the superselection structure in particle physics. Commun. Math. Phys. 1990, 131, 51–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furey, C. SU(3)C×SU(2)L×U(1)Y×U(1)X as a symmetry of division algebraic ladder operators. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018, 78, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senjanović, G. See-saw and Grand Unification. In Proceedings of the SEESAW 25: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Seesaw Mechanism; World Scientific, 2005; pp. 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senjanović, G. Proton Decay and Grand Unification. Proceedings of the SUSY09: The 17th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions AIP 2010, Vol. 1200, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milnor, J.W.; Stasheff, J.D. Characteristic Classes; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chern, S.S.; Simons, J. Characteristic Forms and Geometric Invariants. Ann. Math. 1974, 99, 48–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, D. Line operators in the Standard Model. J. High Energy Phys. 2017, 2017, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henning, B.; Lu, X.; Murayama, H. One-loop matching and running with covariant derivative expansion. J. High Energy Phys. 2018, 2018, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dittmaier, S.; Schuhmacher, S.; Stahlhofen, M. Integrating out heavy fields in the path integral using the background-field method: general formalism. Eur. Phys. J. C 2021, 81, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Booß-Bavnbek, B.; Wojciechowski, K.P. Elliptic Boundary Problems for Dirac Operators. In Mathematics: Theory & Applications; Birkhäuser Boston: Boston, MA, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lions, J.L.; Magenes, E. Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications. Volume I. In Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1972; Vol. 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agmon, S.; Douglis, A.; Nirenberg, L. Estimates Near the Boundary for Solutions of Elliptic Partial Differential Equations Satisfying General Boundary Conditions. I. Communications Pure Appl. Math.> 1959, 12, 623–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agmon, S.; Douglis, A.; Nirenberg, L. Estimates Near the Boundary for Solutions of Elliptic Partial Differential Equations Satisfying General Boundary Conditions. II. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1964, 17, 35–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, M.E. Partial Differential Equations II: Qualitative Studies of Linear Equations. In Applied Mathematical Sciences, 1 ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, 1996; Vol. 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Booß-Bavnbek, B.; Deng, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, C. Continuity of Family of Calderón Projections. arXiv 2020, arXiv:math. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kato, T. Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators. In Classics in Mathematics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kottke, C. An index theorem of Callias type for pseudodifferential operators. J. K.-Theory 2011, 8, 387–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, C.; Nistor, V. An index formula for perturbed Dirac operators on Lie manifolds. J. Geom. Anal. 2014, 24, 1808–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Dungen, K. Generalised Dirac–Schr"odinger operators and the Callias theorem. Forum Math. Sigma 2025, 13, e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackiw, R.; Rebbi, C. Solitons with Fermion Number 1/2. Phys. Rev. D. 1976, 13, 3398–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, D.B. A Method for Simulating Chiral Fermions on the Lattice. Phys. Lett. B 1992, arXiv:hep288, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devastato, A.; Kurkov, M.; Lizzi, F. Spectral Noncommutative Geometry, Standard Model and all that. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2019, 34, 1930010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bochniak, A.; Sitarz, A. A Spectral Geometry for the Standard Model without the Fermion Doubling. Phys. Rev. D. 2020, 101, 075038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navas, S.; et al. Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Rev. D. 2024, 110, 030001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Federer, H.; Fleming, W.H. Normal and Integral Currents. Ann. Math. 1960, 72, 458–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simon, L. Lectures on Geometric Measure Theory. In Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematical Analysis; Australian National University, Australian National University, Centre for Mathematical Analysis: Canberra, 1983; Vol. 3. [Google Scholar]
- Bethuel, F.; Brezis, H.; H’elein, F. Ginzburg-Landau Vortices. In Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications; Birkh"auser Boston: Boston, MA, 1994; Vol. 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jerrard, R.L.; Soner, H.M. The Jacobian and the Ginzburg-Landau energy. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 2002, 14, 151–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atiyah, M.F.; Patodi, V.K.; Singer, I.M. Spectral Asymmetry and Riemannian Geometry. I. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1975, 77, 43–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, P. The index of Callias-type operators with Atiyah–Patodi–Singer boundary conditions. Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 2017, 52, 465–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hélein, F. Gauge and Gravity theories on a dynamical principal bundle. Ann. De La Fac.é Des. Sci. De Toulouse. Mathématiques 2025, arXiv:math34, 743–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baptista, J. Internal symmetries in Kaluza–Klein models. J. High Energy Phys. 2024, arXiv:hep2024, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, H. Gauge theory is about the geometry of internal spaces. arXiv 2024, arXiv:hep. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aharony, O.; Seiberg, N.; Tachikawa, Y. Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories. J. High Energy Phys. 2013, 2013, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Summand in | type | Y |
| 0 | ||
| 1 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).