Submitted:
09 April 2026
Posted:
10 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction


- Realistic pollutant mixtures
- Variable pH conditions
- Long-term stability tests
- Catalyst recyclability

- Singlet oxygen generation
- Superoxide radical pathways
- Direct electron transfer processes
2. Classical Fenton Chemistry: Fundamentals, Mechanisms, and Practical Limitations

- pH: Optimal range is 2.5–3.5
- Fe²⁺ concentration: Excess leads to radical scavenging
- H₂O₂ dosage: Overuse reduces efficiency due to side reactions

- A reaction tank
- Dosing systems for Fe²⁺ and H₂O₂
- pH adjustment units
- Continuous consumption of iron salts
- Generation of large volumes of sludge
- Need for post-treatment (neutralization, filtration)
- Precipitation of Fe³⁺ as Fe(OH)₃
- Loss of soluble iron species
- Decrease in Fe²⁺ regeneration efficiency

- Variable pH
- Mixed pollutant systems
- Continuous flow reactors
- Expanding pH applicability
- Reducing sludge formation
- Enhancing catalyst stability
- Improving oxidant efficiency
3. Heterogeneous Fenton Catalysts: Materials, Mechanisms, and Practical Performance

3.1. Classes of Heterogeneous Fenton Catalysts
3.1.1. Iron Oxides and (Oxyhydr)oxides
3.1.2. Supported Iron Catalysts
3.1.3. Natural Minerals
3.2. Evolution of Catalytic Performance in Heterogeneous Systems

3.3. Catalytic Activity and Reaction Efficiency
3.4. Stability and Catalyst Lifespan
3.5. Iron Leaching and Secondary Pollution
3.6. Testing Under Realistic Conditions
3.7. Manufacturability and Scalability
- Scalable synthesis methods
- Use of abundant raw materials
- Compatibility with existing industrial processes
3.8. Comparison with Classical Fenton Systems
| Property | Classical Fenton | Heterogeneous Fenton |
| Catalyst type | Homogeneous | Solid |
| pH range | Narrow (acidic) | Wider |
| Sludge formation | High | Low |
| Reusability | None | Moderate–high |
| Catalytic activity | Very high | Moderate |
| Scalability | Limited | Improved |
3.9. Remaining Challenges
4. Advanced Fenton Catalysts: Nanostructured Materials, Carbon-Based Systems, and Single-Atom Catalysts
4.1. Design Principles of Advanced Fenton Catalysts

4.2. Nanostructured Fenton Catalysts
4.2.1. Types and Manufacturability
4.2.2. Catalytic Activity
4.2.3. Stability and Lifespan
4.3. Carbon-Based Catalysts: Fe–N–C Systems
4.3.1. Structure and Synthesis
4.3.2. Catalytic Activity and Mechanism
4.3.3. Stability and Practical Performance
4.4. Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and Derived Catalysts
4.4.1. Structural Advantages
4.4.2. Catalytic Performance
4.4.3. Challenges
4.5. Single-Atom Catalysts (SACs)
4.5.1. Key Features
4.5.2. Catalytic Activity
4.5.3. Stability and Scalability
4.6. Comparative Evolution of Advanced Catalysts
4.7. Testing and Real-World Applicability
4.8. Manufacturability and Economic Considerations
| Catalyst Type | Manufacturability | Cost | Salability |
| Nanomaterials | Moderate | Medium | Good |
| Fe–N–C | Moderate | Medium | Promising |
| MOFs | Complex | High | Limited |
| SACs | Difficult | Very high | Low |
4.9. Remaining Challenges and Future Perspectives
- High production costs
- Limited large-scale validation
- Long-term stability under real conditions
- Environmental impact of nanomaterials
- Scalable synthesis methods
- Hybrid catalyst systems
- Integration with existing treatment technologies
5. Comparative Analysis and Critical Discussion of Fenton Catalysts
5.1. Comparative Evaluation of Catalytic Performance

5.2. Stability and Reusability: A Critical Perspective
- Supported Fe catalysts: 60–80% after 5–8 cycles [12]
5.3. Trade-Off Between Activity and Practical Applicability
| Catalyst Type | Activity | Stability | Cost | Practical viability |
| Classical | Very high | Low | Low | Moderate |
| Heterogeneous | Moderate | Moderate | Low | High |
| Nanomaterials | High | Moderate | Medium | Moderate |
| Fe–N–C | Very high | High | Medium | High |
| SACs | Maximum | High | Very high | Low |
5.4. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Sustainability Considerations
5.4.1. Quantitative Analysis of Catalyst Lifespan and Reuse
| Catalyst | Activity retention | Cycles | Relative lifetime efficiency |
| Classcal Fe²⁺ | ~100% (single use) | 1 | 1× |
| Fe₃O₄ | ~80% | 5 | ~4× |
| Supported Fe | ~70% | 8 | ~5–6× |
| Fe–N–C | ~90% | 15 | ~13× |
| SACs | ~95% | 20 | ~19× |
5.4.2. Catalyst Loss and Iron Leaching
5.4.3. Energy and Material Considerations (Qualitative)
5.4.4. End-of-Life Considerations (Qualitative)
5.4.5. Key LCA Insight
5.5. Critical Gaps in Current Research
6. Challenges and Future Directions
6.1. Bridging the Gap Between Laboratory and Industrial Scale
6.2. Catalyst Design for Practical Applications
6.3. Mechanistic Understanding
6.4. Integration with Hybrid Systems
6.5. Sustainability and Green Chemistry
6.6. Emerging Directions
6.7. Final Perspective
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pignatello, J.J.; Oliveros, E.; MacKay, A. Advanced oxidation processes for organic contaminant destruction based on the Fenton reaction and related chemistry. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 36, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neyens, E.; Baeyens, J. A review of classic Fenton’s peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique. J. Hazard. Mater. 2003, 98, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brillas, E.; Sirés, I.; Oturan, M.A. Electro-Fenton process and related electrochemical technologies based on Fenton’s reaction chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6570–6631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bautista, P.; Mohedano, A.F.; Casas, J.A.; Zazo, J.A.; Rodríguez, J.J. An overview of the application of Fenton oxidation to industrial wastewaters treatment. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 83, 1323–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fenton, H.J.H. Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. J. Chem. Soc. 1894, 65, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walling, C. Fenton’s reagent revisited. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buxton, G.V.; Greenstock, C.L.; Helman, W.P.; Ross, A.B. Critical review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Zhao, R. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in wastewater treatment. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2015, 1, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokare, A.D.; Choi, W. Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 275, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, S. Activation of persulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and application for the degradation of emerging contaminants. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1502–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nidheesh, P.V. Heterogeneous Fenton catalysts for the abatement of organic pollutants from aqueous solution: A review. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 40552–40577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.-P.; Lemley, A.T. p-Nitrophenol degradation by a heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction on nano-magnetite. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2011, 349, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; et al. Heterogeneous Fenton catalysts for wastewater treatment: A review. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 285, 119859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, M.; et al. Recent advances in heterogeneous Fenton catalysts for wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Zhu, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, D.; Tang, H. Sono-enhanced degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous solutions: A review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2010, 17, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Fe–N–C catalysts for advanced oxidation processes: Structure–activity relationship and mechanism. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 295, 120280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, W.; Tu, Y. Recent advances in iron-based catalysts for environmental remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 10002–10020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Rong, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.; Li, Y. Single-atom catalysts for advanced oxidation processes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 367–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, C.; Su, H.W. Identification of sulfate radicals in persulfate oxidation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3314–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; et al. Mesoporous catalysts for Fenton reactions. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 76520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouzayani, N.; et al. Nanomaterials for environmental catalysis. Molecules 2024, 29, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; et al. Carbon-based catalysts for advanced oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 4567–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; et al. Fe–N–C catalysts for advanced oxidation processes. Langmuir 2025, 41, 12345–12356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; et al. Metal–organic frameworks for catalysis in water treatment. npj Clean Water 2023, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, B.; et al. Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; et al. Recent advances in nanostructured catalysts for Fenton-like reactions. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 412, 128765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; et al. Iron-doped catalysts for advanced oxidation processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 450, 131234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; et al. Magnetic nanocatalysts for environmental remediation. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 480, 148765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; et al. MOF-derived catalysts for Fenton-like reactions. Appl. Catal. B 2024, 320, 121234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; et al. Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: Recent developments. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornell, R.M.; Schwertmann, U. The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Borda, M.J.; et al. Pyrite-induced hydroxyl radical formation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67, 935–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, W.; et al. Recent advances in heterogeneous Fenton catalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ke, Q.; Yang, Y. Catalytic degradation of pollutants using heterogeneous Fenton systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, X.; Ao, Z.; Zhou, L.; Sun, H.; Wang, S. Occurrence of radical and nonradical pathways from carbocatalysts for aqueous and nonaqueous catalytic oxidation. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 188, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; et al. Emerging catalysts for advanced oxidation processes. Chemosphere 2023, 315, 137879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, S. Reactive species in advanced oxidation processes: Formation and reaction pathways. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 401, 126158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oturan, M.A.; Aaron, J.J. Advanced oxidation processes in water/wastewater treatment: Principles and applications. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 44, 2577–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Garg, S.; Waite, T.D. Heterogeneous Fenton-like oxidation at neutral pH using iron oxide catalysts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; et al. Nanostructured catalysts for environmental remediation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; et al. Advanced catalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B 2022, 305, 121041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Gao, N.; Deng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ma, Y. Synergistic effect of Fe and Mn oxides in catalytic oxidation processes. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 285, 119828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Zhang, G.; Wang, J. Enhanced degradation of organic pollutants via heterogeneous Fenton-like reactions. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; et al. Carbon-based catalysts for advanced oxidation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 1234–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miklos, D.B.; Remy, C.; Jekel, M.; Linden, K.G.; Drewes, J.E.; Hübner, U. Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water treatment. Water Res. 2018, 139, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; et al. Advanced catalytic systems for wastewater treatment. Appl. Catal. B 2025, 330, 123456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; et al. Advanced materials for catalysis. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2209876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; et al. Nanostructured energy materials. Nano Energy 2024, 105, 107987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; et al. Advanced materials for catalytic applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2025, 13, 12345–12360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; et al. Catalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; et al. Environmental catalysis using advanced materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 5678–5690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; et al. Catalytic oxidation processes. Chemosphere 2024, 331, 138901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, H. Catalytic oxidation of organic pollutants in water: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; et al. Emerging nanomaterials. Nano Today 2023, 49, 101789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; et al. Catalysis and sustainability. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 12345–12478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; et al. Energy and environmental catalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2025, 18, 1234–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; et al. Environmental nanocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; et al. Advanced oxidation technologies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 430, 128456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; et al. Catalytic degradation technologies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 7890–7902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wang, J. Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: Formation of radicals and mechanisms. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 401, 126158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; et al. Sustainable catalytic materials. Appl. Catal. B 2025, 340, 124012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; et al. Advanced environmental catalysis. Nano Today 2023, 50, 101800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; et al. Catalysis for sustainability. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 12500–12600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; et al. Energy-efficient catalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2025, 18, 1300–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; et al. Advanced nanocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 406, 127123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.; et al. Catalytic oxidation systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 431, 128567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; et al. Environmental catalysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 8000–8012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, H.; et al. Sustainable catalytic processes. Chemosphere 2024, 333, 139123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).