Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Assessment of the Microcirculation During Extracorporeal Blood Purification in Septic Patients: A Narrative Review

Submitted:

03 April 2026

Posted:

08 April 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background: Microcirculatory dysfunction is a key feature of septic shock and contributes to organ failure despite the apparent normalization of systemic hemodynamic parameters. Extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) therapies aim to modulate the dysregulated inflammatory response through removal of endotoxins and cytokines; however, their impact on tissue-level perfusion remains unclear. Direct bedside assessment of microcirculation may provide mechanistic insight into the effects of EBP beyond macrohemodynamic stabilization. Methods: This structured narrative review summarizes current evidence on direct microcirculatory assessment during EBP therapy in sepsis. A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed using combinations of the terms “microcirculation” and “blood purification” or “hemoadsorption.” Studies published between 2015 and 2026 evaluating direct sublingual microcirculation using sidestream dark field (SDF) or incident dark field (IDF) videomicroscopy during EBP were included. Both experimental and clinical studies were considered. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Selective endotoxin adsorption with polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) demonstrated improvements in perfused vessel density and small vessel density in both animal and clinical settings. Non-selective cytokine adsorption devices (CytoSorb and HA380) were associated with increases in microvascular flow index (MFI), perfused vessel density (PVD), and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV), although most data derive from small observational studies. Across studies, improvements in microcirculatory parameters were observed during or following hemoadsorption therapy; however, heterogeneity in design, timing, and concomitant treatments limits definitive interpretation. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that EBP may positively influence microvascular perfusion in septic shock when assessed using direct videomicroscopy. Nevertheless, data remain limited and predominantly observational. Larger randomized controlled trials incorporating predefined microcirculatory endpoints are required to determine whether mediator removal translates into sustained restoration of tissue perfusion and improved clinical outcomes.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated