Submitted:
12 March 2026
Posted:
18 March 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Area of Study
2.2. Measurement of Soil Nutrients
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Descriptive Statistics for the Effect of Plant Species on Soil Micronutrients
3.1.1. Entandrophragma utile
3.1.2. Hevea brasiliensis
3.1.3. Miletia laurentii
3.1.4. Musanga cercopoides
3.1.5. Triculia africana
3.2. Analysis of Variance for the Effect of Soil Sampling Depth and Plant Species on Soil Micronutrients in the Secondary Forest in June 2022
3.3. Analysis of Variance for the Effect of Soil Sampling Depth and Plant Species on Soil Micronutrients in the Secondary Forest in June 2023
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ordway, E.M.; Asner, G.P.; Lambin, E.F. Deforestation risk due to commodity crop expansion in sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Research Letters 2017, 12, 044015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleman, J.C.; Jarzyna, M.A.; Staver, A.C. Forest extent and deforestation in tropical Africa since 1900. Nature ecology & evolution 2018, 2, 26–33. [Google Scholar]
- Pedroso-Junior, N.N.; Adams, C.; Murrieta, R.S. Slash-and-burn agriculture: a system in transformation. Current trends in human ecology 2009, 12, 12–34. [Google Scholar]
- Styger, E.; Rakotondramasy, H.M.; Pfeffer, M.J.; Fernandes, E.C.; Bates, D.M. Influence of slash-and-burn farming practices on fallow succession and land degradation in the rainforest region of Madagascar. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2007, 119, 257–269. [Google Scholar]
- Besisa Nguba, T.; Bogaert, J.; Makana, J.R.; Mate Mweru, J.P.; Sambieni, K.R.; Bwazani Balandi, J.; Mumbere Musavandalo, C.; Bastin, J.F. Assessing forest degradation in the Congo basin: the need to broaden the focus from logging to small-scale agriculture (a systematic review). Forests 2025, 16, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyukavina, A.; Hansen, M.C.; Potapov, P.; Parker, D.; Okpa, C.; Stehman, S.V.; Kommareddy, I.; Turubanova, S. Congo Basin forest loss dominated by increasing smallholder clearing. Science advances 2018, 4, eaat2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Prajjwal, P.P.A. Agroforestry for Soil Management. In The Living Soil: Foundations of Agriculture; Paper Trail Publication: Munich, Germany, 2025; p. 205. [Google Scholar]
- Wright, S.J. The future of tropical forests. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010, 1195, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ITTO. ITTO guidelines for the restoration, management and rehabilitation of degraded and secondary tropical forests. In ITTO Policy Development Series No 13; International Tropical Timbers Organization: Yokohama, 2002.
- Rey Benayas, J.M.; Bullock, J.M. Restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services on agricultural land. Ecosystems 2012, 15, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldpausch, T.R.; Rondon, M.A.; Fernandes, E.C.; Riha, S.J.; Wandelli, E. Carbon and nutrient accumulation in secondary forests regenerating on pastures in central Amazonia. Ecological applications 2004, 14, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S.K.; Panwar, P.; Banyal, R.; Ramanan S, S. Forest Soils. In Textbook of Forest Science; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2025; pp. 165–189. [Google Scholar]
- Poorter, L.; Rozendaal, D.M.; Bongers, F.; Almeida, D.J.S.; Álvarez, F.S.; Andrade, J.L.; Arreola Villa, L.F.; Becknell, J.M.; Bhaskar, R.; Boukili, V.; Brancalion, P.H. Functional recovery of secondary tropical forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2021, 118, e2003405118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamb, D. Natural regeneration and secondary forests. In Regreening the Bare Hills: Tropical Forest Restoration in the Asia-Pacific Region; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2010; pp. 157–209. [Google Scholar]
- Holz, S.; Placci, G.; Quintana, R.D. Effects of history of use on secondary forest regeneration in the Upper Parana Atlantic Forest (Misiones, Argentina). Forest ecology and management 2009, 258, 1629–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, S.; Lugo, A.E. Tropical secondary forests. Journal of tropical ecology 1990, 6, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, I.L.; DeWalt, S.J.; Lopez, O.R.; Bunnefeld, L.; Pattison, Z.; Dent, D.H. Above-and belowground carbon stocks are decoupled in secondary tropical forests and are positively related to forest age and soil nutrients respectively. Science of the Total Environment 2019, 697, 133987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hobbie, S.E. Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks. Trends in ecology & evolution 2015, 30, 357–363. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, X.; Zhu, B.; Nie, Y.; Liu, Y.; Kuzyakov, Y. Root and mycorrhizal strategies for nutrient acquisition in forests under nitrogen deposition: a meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2021, 163, 108418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, K.; Niklaus, P.A.; Schmid, B.; He, J.S. Positive effects of tree species diversity on litterfall quantity and quality along a secondary successional chronosequence in a subtropical forest. Journal of Plant Ecology 2017, 10, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Yang, F.; Ou, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, J.; Chu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Otieno, D.; Zhou, G. Changes in forest soil properties in different successional stages in lower tropical China. PloS one 2013, 8, e81359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanzito, G.; Ibanda, P.A.; Ocan, D.; Lejoly, J. Use of charcoal (biochar) to enhance tropical soil fertility: A case of Masako in Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 2020, 11, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkongolo, N.V.; Liotho, J.L.; Mokea, D.A. Soil Properties Related to Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions in a Primary and Fallow Forests at Masako Forest Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo. International conference on Mediterranean Geosciences Union, 2023, November; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham; pp. 255–259. [Google Scholar]
- Bastin, J.F.; Barbier, N.; Réjou-Méchain, M.; Fayolle, A.; Gourlet-Fleury, S.; Maniatis, D.; De Haulleville, T.; Baya, F.; Beeckman, H.; Beina, D.; Couteron, P. Seeing Central African forests through their largest trees. Scientific reports 2015, 5, 13156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsongo, J.M.; Sabongo, P.; Kambale, J.K.; Malombo, B.T.; Katembo, E.W.; Kavira, P.K.; Asimonyio, J.A.; Konga, P.M.; Ngbolua, K.N. Régénération naturelle de Gilbertiodendron dewevrei (De Wild.) J. Léonard (Leguminosae) dans la réserve forestière de Masako à Kisangani, République Démocratique du Congo. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research 2016, 21, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
- Adejumo, O.E.; Owa-Agbanah, I.S.; Kolapo, A.L.; Ayoola, M.D. Phytochemical and antisickling activities of Entandrophragma utile, Chenopodium ambrosioides and Petiveria alliacea. J Med Plants Res 2011, 5, 1531–1535. [Google Scholar]
- Ramzan, S.; Wani, M.A. Geographic information system and geostatistical techniques to characterize spatial variability of soil micronutrients including toxic metals in an agricultural farm. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2018, 49, 463–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Miegroet, H.; Olsson, M. Ecosystem disturbance and soil organic carbon–a review. Soil carbon in sensitive European ecosystems: From science to land management 2011, 85–117. [Google Scholar]
- Anas, M.; Khattak, W.A.; Majeed, M.; Hakki, E.E.; Fahad, S. Redox reactions and their influence on the nutrient availability of plants. In Sustainable Soil Chemistry and Plant Nutrition; Elsevier, 2026; pp. 195–218. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, R.; Shivay, Y.S.; Kumar, D. Interactions of zinc with other nutrients in soils and plants-A Review. Indian Journal of Fertilisers 2016, 12, 16–26. [Google Scholar]
- Dent, D.H.; Wright, S.J. The future of tropical species in secondary forests: a quantitative review. Biological conservation 2009, 142, 2833–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, G.P.; Meenakumari, T. Natural Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis [Willd. ex A. Juss.] Müll. Arg.): History, Domestication, Genetic Diversity, Conservation and Cultivar Improvement. In Economically Important Trees: Origin, Evolution, Genetic Diversity and Ecology; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2024; pp. 3–50. [Google Scholar]
- Zemunik, G.; Winter, K.; Turner, B.L. Toxic effects of soil manganese on tropical trees. Plant and Soil 2020, 453, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, E.; Aguiar, A.A.; Ferreira, I.M. Influence of soil chemistry and plant physiology in the phytoremediation of Cu, Mn, and Zn. Critical reviews in plant sciences 2014, 33, 351–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, M. Natural Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell Arg.). In Soil Health Management for Plantation Crops: Recent Advances and New Paradigms; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2024; pp. 281–308. [Google Scholar]
- Choula, F.; Taffouo, V.D.; Priso, R.J.; Etame, J.; Zapfack, L.; Ntsomboh Ntsefong, G.; Ngane, K.B. Regeneration, growth and nutrient partitioning of three woody species on degraded tropical rainforest land. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2017, 15, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Riaz, M. Plant–soil interactions and nutrient cycling dynamics in tropical rainforests. In Environment, climate, plant and vegetation growth; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, 2024; pp. 229–264. [Google Scholar]
- Nair, P.R.; Kumar, B.M.; Nair, V.D. Soil organic matter (SOM) and nutrient cycling. In An introduction to agroforestry: Four decades of scientific developments; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2022; pp. 383–411. [Google Scholar]
- Porter, G.S.; Bajita-Locke, J.B.; Hue, N.V.; Strand, D. Manganese solubility and phytotoxicity affected by soil moisture, oxygen levels, and green manure additions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2004, 35, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szott, L.T.; Palm, C.A.; Sanchez, P.A. Agroforestry in acid soils of the humid tropics. Advances in Agronomy 1991, 45, 275–301. [Google Scholar]
- Aubréville, A.; Bossanyi, I. Secondary Forests in Equatorial Africa Côte d’Ivoire-Cameroon-FEA. Bois & Forets Des Tropiques 2015, 323, 19–48. [Google Scholar]
- Mueller, K.E.; Eissenstat, D.M.; Hobbie, S.E.; Oleksyn, J.; Jagodzinski, A.M.; Reich, P.B.; Chadwick, O.A.; Chorover, J. Tree species effects on coupled cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and acidity in mineral soils at a common garden experiment. Biogeochemistry 2012, 111, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabaniss, S.E.; Shuman, M.S. Copper binding by dissolved organic matter: II. Variation in type and source of organic matter. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 1988, 52, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rieuwerts, J.S. The mobility and bioavailability of trace metals in tropical soils: a review. Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability 2007, 19, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojimelukwe, P.C.; Ugwuona, F.U. The traditional and medicinal use of African breadfruit (Treculia africana Decne): an underutilized ethnic food of the Ibo tribe of South East, Nigeria. Journal of ethnic foods 2021, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, J.N.; Gütlein, A.; Sierra Cornejo, N.; Kiese, R.; Hertel, D.; Kuzyakov, Y. Legume and non-legume trees increase soil carbon sequestration in Savanna. Ecosystems 2017, 20, 989–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| --------------- Soil micronutrients ---------------- | ||||||
| Descriptive statistics | B | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn | Al |
| (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | |
| Mean | 0.39 | 182.75 | 0.76 | 0.46 | 0.07 | 400.75 |
| Standard dev (SD) | 0.12 | 35.06 | 1.21 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 76.86 |
| Variance | 30.82 | 19.19 | 160.29 | 35.83 | 298.63 | 19.18 |
| C.V. | 0.24 | 112.00 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 297.00 |
| Minimum | 0.37 | 182.00 | 0.01 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 393.50 |
| Median | 0.66 | 253.00 | 4.00 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 522.00 |
| Maximum | 0.88 | -0.02 | 1.77 | 0.52 | 3.02 | 0.18 |
| Skewness | 0.34 | 0.36 | 2.31 | -1.14 | 7.09 | -1.09 |
| --------------- Soil micronutrients ---------------- | ||||||
| Descriptive statistics | B | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn | Al |
| (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | |
| Mean | 0.21 | 133.75 | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.01 | 411.25 |
| Standard dev (SD) | 0.13 | 19.06 | 0.99 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 67.56 |
| Variance | 0.02 | 363.11 | 0.98 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 4564.80 |
| C.V. | 61.19 | 14.25 | 168.13 | 51.72 | 0.00 | 16.43 |
| Minimum | 0.01 | 102.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 268.00 |
| Median | 0.25 | 133.50 | 0.01 | 0.43 | 0.01 | 415.50 |
| Maximum | 0.35 | 163.00 | 3.00 | 0.95 | 0.01 | 504.00 |
| Skewness | -0.74 | -0.06 | 1.50 | 0.26 | 0.01 | -0.57 |
| Kurtosis | -0.89 | -0.81 | 0.96 | 0.41 | 0.01 | -0.23 |
| --------------- Soil micronutrients ---------------- | ||||||
| Descriptive statistics | B | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn | Al |
| (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | |
| Mean | 0.41 | 210.00 | 1.50 | 0.53 | 0.09 | 462.83 |
| Standard dev (SD) | 0.12 | 44.72 | 1.73 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 135.88 |
| Variance | 0.01 | 1999.60 | 2.99 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 18464.00 |
| C.V. | 29.48 | 21.29 | 114.89 | 58.42 | 308.96 | 29.36 |
| Minimum | 0.26 | 156.00 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 332.00 |
| Median | 0.41 | 188.50 | 1.00 | 0.40 | 0.01 | 417.00 |
| Maximum | 0.63 | 285.00 | 5.00 | 1.21 | 1.00 | 732.00 |
| Skewness | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.83 | 1.21 | 3.02 | 0.80 |
| Kurtosis | -0.62 | -1.32 | -0.57 | 0.13 | 7.09 | -0.81 |
| --------------- Soil micronutrients ---------------- | ||||||
| Descriptive statistics | B | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn | Al |
| (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | |
| Mean | 0.12 | 114.50 | 40.08 | 0.66 | 4.99 | 294.33 |
| Standard dev (SD) | 0.14 | 21.80 | 39.47 | 0.40 | 8.21 | 112.16 |
| Variance | 0.02 | 475.36 | 1557.90 | 0.16 | 67.41 | 12581.00 |
| C.V. | 117.86 | 19.04 | 98.47 | 61.06 | 164.56 | 38.11 |
| Minimum | 0.01 | 79.00 | 2.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 100.00 |
| Median | 0.01 | 124.50 | 31.00 | 0.55 | 0.92 | 277.00 |
| Maximum | 0.35 | 142.00 | 115.00 | 1.42 | 24.31 | 495.00 |
| Skewness | 0.57 | -0.41 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 1.57 | 0.29 |
| Kurtosis | -1.41 | -1.24 | -1.15 | -0.67 | 0.93 | -0.57 |
| --------------- Soil micronutrients ---------------- | ||||||
| Descriptive statistics | B | Fe | Mn | Cu | Zn | Al |
| (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | |
| Mean | 0.50 | 215.67 | 2.34 | 0.44 | 0.59 | 433.50 |
| Standard dev (SD) | 0.25 | 72.21 | 4.07 | 0.22 | 0.90 | 157.97 |
| Variance | 0.06 | 5214.10 | 16.59 | 0.05 | 0.81 | 24956.00 |
| C.V. | 49.18 | 33.48 | 174.22 | 49.45 | 153.22 | 36.44 |
| Minimum | 0.01 | 115.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 205.00 |
| Median | 0.51 | 233.50 | 1.00 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 375.50 |
| Maximum | 0.84 | 341.00 | 14.00 | 0.83 | 2.39 | 714.00 |
| Skewness | -0.29 | 0.02 | 2.20 | -0.05 | 1.36 | 0.67 |
| Kurtosis | -0.57 | -1.16 | 3.79 | -0.16 | 0.32 | -0.53 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).