Submitted:
07 March 2026
Posted:
10 March 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
3. Methodology
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Methodological Procedures
- Stage I – Theoretical Review of the Topic
- Step II – Definition of the Enterprises Investigated
- Institutional database: information from the Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Meio Ambiente do Rio Grande do Norte (IDEMA) and the Municipal Department of Urbanism, Environment, and Urban Services;
- Infrastructure and establishment size: selection of fuel stations of varying sizes (micro, small, and medium), encompassing establishments ranging from those with minimal infrastructure to larger units;
- Location and demand for road transport: prioritization of fuel stations located in areas with high demand for road transportation;
- Manager receptiveness: prioritization of fuel stations whose managers demonstrated greater openness to the research and interest in environmental management.
- Stage III – Definition of Research Instruments
- General aspects of fuel stations: number of employees; economic size (annual revenue); property area; business age; operating hours; provision of complementary services; implementation of environmental and safety training; adopted sustainability measures; employees’ environmental awareness; and total fuel storage capacity.
- General aspects of fuel stations: number of employees; economic size (annual revenue); property area; business age; operating hours; provision of complementary services; implementation of environmental and safety training; adopted sustainability measures; employees’ environmental awareness; and total fuel storage capacity.
- Ei corresponds to the performance of the station in axis iii
- Ncompliant represents the number of indicators classified as compliant;
- Nválid represents the total number of valid indicators for the respective dimension.
- Environmental Legality: Compliance with laws and licensing; Existence of fines or environmental legal issues; Environmental administrative sanctions in the last three years.
- Environmental Practices: Environmental responsibility; Waste collection and management system; Environmental monitoring and maintenance; Water reuse program. N_valid = 4
- Operational Management: Environmental management system; Management program; Environmental and safety training; Stakeholder engagement; Employee training; Occupational safety professional; Proper use of PPE; Emergency control plan; Health and public safety risks. Nvalid = 9
- Environmental Legality (%): Percentage of legal indicators fulfilled by each station (licensing, legal compliance, absence of sanctions)
- Environmental Practices (%): Degree of adoption of environmental and preventive practices (waste management, monitoring, water reuse, maintenance)
-
Operational Management (%): Organizational and operational structure of environmental management (EMS, training, PPE, emergency plans).For the calculation of the ISE, formula (2) was adopted along with the classification shown in Table 1.
- Stage IV – Registration with the Research Ethics Committee (REC)
- Step V – Direct Data Collection in the Field
- Informed Consent Form (ICF): participants signed the form prior to responding to the interviews or questionnaires;
- Interviews and Questionnaire Administration: the instruments were administered to the managers of the fuel stations with the aim of characterizing the enterprises and systematically assessing the management practices implemented.
- Stage VI – Indirect Data Collection in the Field
- Stage VII – Data Organization, Processing, and Analysis
- Step VIII – Project Closure
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. General Aspects

4.2. Corporate Sustainability Indices
5. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Araújo, F. S.; Lima, R. C. Eficiência energética e gestão ambiental em empreendimentos urbanos: desafios e perspectivas. Rev. Gestão Ambiental 2024, 18(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar]
- Barbieri, J. C. Gestão ambiental empresarial: conceitos, modelos e instrumentos, 5th ed.; Saraiva: São Paulo, Brazil, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Barbieri, J. C.; Vasconcelos, I. F. G.; Andreassi, T.; Vasconcelos, F. C. Inovação sustentável e desempenho organizacional. Rev. Adm. Empresas 2021, 61(2), e2020-0123. [Google Scholar]
- Barceló, D. Water Pollution: Emerging Contaminants and Human Health; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Batista, M. E.; Rocha, A. L.; Santos, T. P. Gestão de resíduos sólidos em postos de combustíveis. Rev. Gestão & Sustentabilidade Ambiental 2023, 12(3), 89–105. [Google Scholar]
- Bocken, N. M. P.; Schuit, C. S. C.; Kraaijenhagen, C. Experimenting with circular business models: Lessons from eight cases. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 2021, 28, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braga, B. Introdução à Engenharia Ambiental; Pearson: São Paulo, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- CETESB—Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo. Relatório de Áreas Contaminadas e Reabilitadas no Estado de São Paulo; CETESB: São Paulo, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz, R. C.; Neris, J. S.; Menezes, A. P. Gestão ambiental em postos de combustíveis: riscos e práticas preventivas. Rev. Gestão Sustent. Ambient. 2018, 7, 412–430. [Google Scholar]
- Dantas, R. M.; Nascimento, F. A. Comércio varejista de combustíveis e geração de emprego no setor terciário urbano. Rev. Bras. Estud. Reg. Urbanos 2019, 13, 145–162. [Google Scholar]
- Dias, R. Gestão Ambiental: Responsabilidade Social e Sustentabilidade; Atlas: São Paulo, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Elkington, J. Green Swans: The Coming Boom in Regenerative Capitalism; Fast Company Press: New York, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Fetter, C. W. Applied Hydrogeology, 5th ed.; Waveland Press: Long Grove, IL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Franceschi, J. C.; Pereira, A. S.; Ribeiro, L. M. Gestão ambiental e desempenho econômico em empreendimentos de médio porte. Rev. Adm. Contemp. 2012, 16, 583–601. [Google Scholar]
- Franceschi, J. C.; Pereira, A. S.; Ribeiro, L. M. Sustentabilidade e desempenho ambiental em empreendimentos urbanos: avanços e limitações. Rev. Adm. Contemp. 2022, 26(4), e210078. [Google Scholar]
- Friede, G.; Busch, T.; Bassen, A. ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J. Sustain. Finance Invest. 2023, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N. M. P.; Hultink, E. J. The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, S. L.; Dowell, G. A natural-resource-based view of the firm—Fifteen years after. J. Manag. 2021, 47, 1739–1754. [Google Scholar]
- IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Cidades e Estados: Mossoró (RN); IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Krajnc, D.; Glavič, P. Indicators of sustainable production. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2022, 24, 145–162. [Google Scholar]
- Leff, E. Epistemologia Ambiental; Cortez: São Paulo, Brazil, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Lima, T. J.; Santos, M. A. Licenciamento ambiental e gestão de riscos em postos de combustíveis no semiárido nordestino. Rev. Geogr. Meio Ambiente 2021, 12, 88–104. [Google Scholar]
- Lima, R. S.; Costa, P. A.; Andrade, M. Sustentabilidade e gestão ambiental em postos de combustíveis do semiárido brasileiro. Rev. Bras. Gestão Ambient. 2025, 19(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Lozano, R.; Barreiro-Gen, M.; Lozano, F. J.; Sammalisto, K. Teaching sustainability in higher education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2020, 21(6), 1039–1055. [Google Scholar]
- López-Arceiz, F. J.; Bellostas, A. J.; Rivera-Torres, P.; Muñoz-Torres, M. J. Sustainability reporting and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Lorenzett, D. B.; Rossato, M. V.; Neuhaus, C. E. Avaliação da gestão ambiental em postos revendedores de combustíveis. Rev. Gestão Ambient. Sustentabilidade 2011, 1, 23–40. [Google Scholar]
- Martins, L. A.; Ribeiro, F. M.; Teixeira, H. S. Monitoramento ambiental urbano e gestão sustentável. Rev. Geogr. Meio Ambiente 2024, 11(1), 77–94. [Google Scholar]
- Martins, R. A.; Escrivão Filho, E.; Nagano, M. S. Gestão ambiental e desempenho organizacional. Produção 2015, 25, 635–650. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, K.; Lund-Thomsen, P.; Lindgreen, A. Corporate sustainability and institutional pressures. J. Bus. Ethics 2022, 178, 789–805. [Google Scholar]
- Nogueira, J. M.; Farias, L. R.; Alves, R. P. Indicadores ambientais como instrumento de gestão. Rev. Bras. Gestão Ambient. 2022, 16, 55–72. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, J. P.; Silva, R. M.; Costa, A. L. Gestão ambiental empresarial e conformidade legal. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Ambient. 2022, 57(4), 620–638. [Google Scholar]
- Pereira, A. S.; Souza, R. L.; Silva, M. C. Indicadores de sustentabilidade aplicados ao setor de combustíveis. Rev. Adm. Pública 2021, 55(3), 589–610. [Google Scholar]
- Philippi Jr., A. Gestão Ambiental Municipal; Manole: São Paulo, Brazil, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Philippi Jr., A.; Roméro, M. A. Gestão Ambiental nas Cidades; Manole: São Paulo, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Rivett, M. O.; Dearden, R. A.; Wealthall, G. P.; McAlary, T. A. Review of unsaturated-zone transport and attenuation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2016, 191, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
- Sachs, I. Rumo à Ecossocioeconomia: Teoria e Prática do Desenvolvimento; Cortez: São Paulo, Brazil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Searcy, C. Corporate sustainability performance measurement systems. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 107(3), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaltegger, S.; Hörisch, J.; Freeman, R. E. Business cases for sustainability. Organ. Environ. 2021, 34(3), 364–389. [Google Scholar]
- Souza, R. L. Gestão ambiental em postos de combustíveis: avaliação por indicadores de sustentabilidade. Master’s Dissertation, UFRN, Natal, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Souza, R. L.; Costa, P. A.; Andrade, M. Avaliação da sustentabilidade ambiental em atividades potencialmente poluidoras. Rev. Gestão Ambiental 2021, 15(2), 33–49. [Google Scholar]
- Sroufe, R.; Melnyk, S. A.; Buehlmann, U.; Gonzalez, J. Sustainability-driven innovation. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar]


| ISE | CLASSIFICATION |
|---|---|
| < 50% | Low performance |
| 50% < ISE < 75% | Intermediate performance |
| ISE > 75% | High performance |
| VARIABLE | QUANTITATIVE (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employees | Below 10 | 10 a 30 | 30 a 50 | ||||||||
| 25% | 66,7% | 8,3% | |||||||||
| Annual revenue | Microenterprise | Small-sized enterprise | Medium-sized enterprise | ||||||||
| 41,7% | 0% | 58,3% | |||||||||
| Property Area | Up to 750 m² | From 750 m² to 2250 m² | 2250 m² to 6750 m² | ||||||||
| 41,6% | 25% | 33,4% | |||||||||
| Time of Operation | Up 5 anos | From 06 to 09 anos | Over 10 years | ||||||||
| 0% | 16,6% | 83,7% | |||||||||
| Operating Hours | Single Shift | Morning and Afternoon Shifts | Full-time Operation | ||||||||
| 0% | 41,6% | 58,4% | |||||||||
| Additional Services | Convenience Store | Car Wash | Workshop | Oil Change | LPG Sales | Oil Sales | Others | ||||
| 46,84% | 5,86% | 5,86% | 23,93% | 5,86% | 11,65% | 0% | |||||
| Environmental and Safety Training | Yes | No | |||||||||
| 91,6% | 8,4% | ||||||||||
| Sustainability Actions | Leak Measurement | RSA | Solid Waste Management | Spill Prevention and Control | Soil Containment and Protection | Training | Occupational Health and Safety | ||||
| 21,82% | 21,82% | 21,82% | 13,07% | 13,07% | 6,39% | 2,01% | |||||
| Employees Environmental Awareness |
Environmental Preservation |
Impact Prevention and Minimization | Environmental Culture | Occupational Health and Safety | Solid Waste Management | Training | Compliance with Environmental Laws | ||||
| 31,6% | 15,8% | 15,8% | 15,8% | 10,4% | 5,3% | 5,3% | |||||
|
Total Fuel Storage Capacity |
45 m³ | 60 m³ | 70 m³ | 75 m³ | 90 m³ | 105 m³ | 120 m³ | ||||
| 8,3% | 33,4% | 8,3% | 8,3% | 16,7% | 16,7% | 8,3% | |||||
| SERVICE STATIONS | Environmental Legality (%) | Environmental Practices (%) | Operational Management (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 33,3% | 75% | 100% |
| B | 33,3% | 75% | 100% |
| C | 33,3% | 75% | 100% |
| D | 33,3% | 75% | 100% |
| E | 33,3% | 75% | 100% |
| F | 33,3% | 75% | 100% |
| G | 33,3% | 50% | 77,8% |
| H | 33,3% | 75% | 77,8% |
| I | 33,3% | 75% | 88,9% |
| J | 33,3% | 75% | 100% |
| K | 33,3% | 75% | 88,9% |
| L | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| POSTOS | INDICADORES | ISE (%) | CLASSIFICAÇÃO |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 13 | 76,5% | High Performance |
| B | 12 | 70,6% | Intermediate Performance |
| C | 14 | 82,4% | High Performance |
| D | 15 | 88,2% | High Performance |
| E | 15 | 88,2% | High Performance |
| F | 15 | 88,2% | High Performance |
| G | 13 | 76,5% | High Performance |
| H | 13 | 76,5% | High Performance |
| I | 15 | 88,2% | High Performance |
| J | 15 | 88,2% | High Performance |
| K | 14 | 82,4% | High Performance |
| L | 15 | 88,2% | High Performance |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).