This paper examines the strategic manipulationof government debt data—referred to as ”fiscal rule stretch-ing”—among European Union member states, particularly inresponse to electoral incentives, financial market stress, and theconstraints of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). Using Euro-stat revisions of government debt figures, we find that countrieswith higher debt levels, particularly those exceeding the 60% ofGDP SGP threshold, are more likely to have their debt figuresrevised upwards. Our analysis further reveals that eurozonemembers are more inclined to engage in rule stretching, especiallywhen facing Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP) enforcement.Election timing plays a crucial role in this behavior, with un-scheduled elections and proximity to elections both significantlyincreasing the likelihood of debt revisions. Financial market stressamplifies these effects, as governments under pressure may resortto optimistic accounting to present more favorable debt statistics.While fiscal transparency appears to be positively associated withdebt revisions, suggesting that transparent governments may relyon more sophisticated methods of rule stretching, GDP growthdoes not show a significant impact. Overall, our findings highlightthe intersection of domestic political cycles, financial constraints,and EU-level oversight in shaping fiscal reporting practices acrossmember states.