Preprint
Short Note

This version is not peer-reviewed.

C*-Metric Bourgain-Figiel-Milman, Enflo Type and Mendel-Naor Cotype Problems

Submitted:

25 February 2026

Posted:

02 March 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We ask for C*-metric version of following three: (1) Bourgain-Figiel-Milman Theorem, (2) Enflo Type, (3) Mendel-Naor Cotype.
Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. C*-Metric Bourgain-Figiel-Milman Problem

Let X and Y be finite dimensional Banach spaces such that dim ( X ) = dim ( Y ) . The Banach-Mazur distance between X and Y is defined as
d B M ( X , Y ) inf { T T 1 : T : X Y is invertible linear operator } .
For n N , let ( R n , · , · ) be the standard Euclidean Hilbert space. In 1960, Dvoretzky proved the following surprising result [1].
Theorem 1.1. 
[1,2] (Dvoretzky Theorem) There is a universal constant C > 0 satisfying the following property: If X is any n-dimensional real Banach space and 0 < ε < 1 3 , then for every natural number
k C log n ε 2 | log ε | ,
there exists a k-dimensional Banach subspace Y of X such that
d B M ( Y , ( R k , · , · ) ) < 1 + ε .
We refer [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] for more information on Dvoretzky theorem. Having Theorem 1.1, we ask about the metric space version of that. Let M and N be finite metric spaces with o ( M ) = o ( N ) . Given a map f : M N , define
f Lip sup d ( f ( x ) , f ( y ) ) d ( x , y ) : x , y M , x y .
The Bourgain-Figiel-Milman distance between M and N is defined as
d B F M ( M , N ) inf { f Lip f 1 Lip : f : M N is injective } .
In 1986, Bourgain, Figiel and Milman proved the following nonlinear Dvoretzky theorem [18].
Theorem 1.2. 
[18] (Bourgain-Figiel-Milman Theorem) For every ε > 0 , there is a universal constant C ( ε ) > 0 satisfying the following: Every finite metric space M contains a subset N satisfying following conditions.
(i) 
There is an injective map f : N 2 ( N , R ) such that
d B F M ( N , f ( N ) ) 1 + ε .
(ii) 
o ( N ) C ( ε ) log ( o ( M ) ) .
Further, following holds: If ε < 1 , then we can take
C ( ε ) = c 1 ε log ( c 2 ε ) for some c 1 > 0 , c 2 > 0 .
We will formulate problem based on Theorem 1.2 to C*-algebra valued metric spaces. These are generalizations of metric spaces introduced in 2014 by Ma, Jiang and Sun [19].
Definition 1.3. 
[19] Let A be a unital C*-algebra and A + { a a * : a A } be the set of all positive elements in A . Let M be a set. A map d * : M × M A + is said to be a C*-valued metric if it satisfies following conditions.
(i) 
If x , y M are such that d * ( x , y ) = 0 , then x = y .
(ii) 
d * ( x , y ) = d * ( y , x ) for all x , y M .
(iii) 
d * ( x , y ) d * ( x , z ) + d * ( z , y ) for all x , y , z M .
In this case, ( M , d * ) is called as a C*-metric space.
Given a unital C*-algebra A , we have the standard Hilbert C*-module over A :
2 ( N , A ) { a n } n = 1 : a n A , n N , n = 1 a n * a n A
equipped with the inner product
{ a n } n = 1 , { b n } n = 1 n = 1 a n * b n , { a n } n = 1 , { b n } n = 1 2 ( N , A ) .
Hence the norm on 2 ( N , A ) is given by
{ a n } n = 1 n = 1 a n * a n 1 2 , { a n } n = 1 2 ( N , A ) .
Let Ω be a compact Hausdorff space. Let A C ( Ω ) be the C*-algebra of set of all continuous functions on Ω with standard involution and sup norm. Define
d * ( { f n } n = 1 , { g n } n = 1 ) n = 1 | f n g n | 2 1 2 A , { a n } n = 1 , { b n } n = 1 2 ( N , A ) .
Then ( 2 ( N , A ) , d * ) is a C*-metric space. We now ask for C*-metric version of Bourgain-Figiel-Milman theorem.
Problem 1.4. 
(C*-metric Bourgain-Figiel-Milman Problem) Let A be a unital C*-algebra. For every ε > 0 , whether there is a universal constant C ( ε , A ) > 0 satisfying the following: Every finite C*-metric space M contains a subset N satisfying following conditions.
(i) 
There is an injective map f : N 2 ( N , A ) such that
d B F M ( N , f ( N ) ) 1 + ε .
(ii) 
o ( N ) C ( ε , A ) log ( o ( M ) ) .

2. C*-Metric Enflo Type and Mendel-Naor Cotype Problems

Let H be a Hilbert space, n N . Recall that for any n points h 1 , , h n H , we have
1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } j = 1 n ε j h j 2 = j = 1 n h j 2 .
It is Equality (1) which motivated the definition of Type and Cotype for Banach spaces.
Definition 2.1. 
[2] Let 1 p 2 . A Banach space X is said to be of (Rademacher) Type p if there exists T p ( X ) > 0 such that
1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } j = 1 n ε j x j p 1 p T p ( X ) j = 1 n x j p 1 p , x 1 , , x n X , n N .
Definition 2.2. 
[2] Let 2 q < . A Banach space X is said to be of(Rademacher) Cotype qif there exists C q ( X ) > 0 such that
j = 1 n x j q 1 q C q ( X ) 1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } j = 1 n ε j x j q 1 q , x 1 , , x n X , n N .
There is a vast literature on Type-Cotype of Banach spaces, see [2,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
In 1970, Enflo introduced the notion of Type for metric spaces [29,30].
Definition 2.3. 
[29,30] Let p > 0 . A metric space ( M , d ) is said to be of Enflo Type p if there exists E p ( M ) > 0 satisfying following conditions: For every n N and for every f : { 1 , 1 } n M it holds
1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } d ( f ( ε 1 , , ε n ) , d ( ε 1 , , ε n ) ) p 1 p E p ( M ) j = 1 n 1 2 n ε 1 , , ε n { 1 , 1 } d ( f ( ε 1 , , ε j 1 , ε j , ε j + 1 , , ε n ) , d ( ε 1 , , ε j 1 , ε j , ε j + 1 , , ε n ) ) p 1 p .
In 2008, Mendel and Naor introduced the notion of Cotype for metric spaces [30].
Definition 2.4. 
[30] Let q > 0 . A metric space ( M , d ) is said to be of Mendel-Naor Cotype q if there exists Γ q ( M ) > 0 satisfying following conditions: For every n N , there exists an even integer m N such that for every f : Z m n M it holds
j = 1 n 1 m n x Z m n d f x + m 2 e j , f ( x ) q Γ q ( M ) q m q 1 m n x Z m n 1 3 n ε { 1 , 0 , 1 } n d ( f ( x + ε ) , f ( x ) ) q , ε = ( ε 1 , , ε n ) ,
where { e j } j = 1 n is the standard basis for R n .
We now ask for C*-metric versions of Enflo Type and Mendel-Naor Cotype.
Problem 2.5. 
(C*-metric Enflo Type Problem)Whether there is a way to define C*-metric Enflo Type?
Problem 2.6. 
(C*-metric Mendel-Naor Cotype Problem)Whether there is a way to define C*-metric Mendel-Naor Cotype?
Note that there are also notions of Type for metric spaces by Bourgain, Milman and Wolfson [31] and by Ball [32]. These lead to following problems.
Problem 2.7. 
(C*-metric Bourgain-Milman-Wolfson Type Problem)Whether there is a way to define C*-metric Bourgain-Milman-Wolfson Type?
Problem 2.8. 
(C*-metric Markov/Ball Type Problem)Whether there is a way to define C*-metric Markov/Ball Type?
Remark 2.9. 
In 2023, we formulated Modular Dvoretzky and Type-Cotype problems which are still open [33].

References

  1. Dvoretzky, A. Some results on convex bodies and Banach spaces. In Proceedings of the Proc. Internat. Sympos. Linear Spaces (Jerusalem, 1960, 1961; Jerusalem Academic Press: Jerusalem; Pergamon: Oxford; pp. 123–160. [Google Scholar]
  2. Albiac, F.; Kalton, N.J. Topics in Banach space theory. In Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer: [Cham], 2016; Vol. 233, p. xx+508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Milman, V.D.; Schechtman, G. Asymptotic theory of finite-dimensional normed spaces . In Lecture Notes in Mathematics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1986; Vol. 1200, p. viii+156. [Google Scholar]
  4. Milman, V.D. A new proof of A. Dvoretzky’s theorem on cross-sections of convex bodies. Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen. 1971, 5, 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  5. Milman, V. Dvoretzky’s theorem—thirty years later. Geom. Funct. Anal. 1992, 2, 455–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Figiel, T. A short proof of Dvoretzky’s theorem on almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Compositio Math. 1976, 33, 297–301. [Google Scholar]
  7. Szankowski, A. On Dvoretzky’s theorem on almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Israel J. Math. 1974, 17, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Matousek, J. Lectures on discrete geometry . In Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2002; Vol. 212, p. xvi+481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Matsak, I.; Plichko, A. Dvoretzky’s theorem by Gaussian method. In Functional analysis and its applications; Elsevier Sci. B. V.: Amsterdam; North-Holland Math. Stud., 2004; Vol. 197, pp. 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pisier, G. The volume of convex bodies and Banach space geometry. In Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989; Vol. 94, p. xvi+250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gordon, Y.; Guedon, O.; Meyer, M. An isomorphic Dvoretzky’s theorem for convex bodies. Studia Math. 1998, 127, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Figiel, T. A short proof of Dvoretzky’s theorem. In Séminaire Maurey-Schwartz 1974–1975: Espaces Lp, applications radonifiantes et géométrie des espaces de Banach, Exp. No. XXIII; 1975; (erratum, p. 3). [Google Scholar]
  13. Figiel, T. Some remarks on Dvoretzky’s theorem on almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Colloq. Math. 1971, 24, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Figiel, T.; Lindenstrauss, J.; Milman, V.D. The dimension of almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Acta Math. 1977, 139, 53–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schechtman, G. A remark concerning the dependence on ϵ in Dvoretzky’s theorem. In Geometric aspects of functional analysis (1987–88);Lecture Notes in Math.; Springer: Berlin, 1989; Vol. 1376, pp. 274–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gordon, Y. Gaussian processes and almost spherical sections of convex bodies. Ann. Probab. 1988, 16, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pisier, G. Probabilistic methods in the geometry of Banach spaces. In Probability and analysis (Varenna, 1985);Lecture Notes in Math.; Springer: Berlin, 1986; Vol. 1206, pp. 167–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bourgain, J.; Figiel, T.; Milman, V. On Hilbertian subsets of finite metric spaces. Isr. J. Math. 1986, 55, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, Z.; Jiang, L.; Sun, H. C*-algebra-valued metric spaces and related fixed point theorems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2014, 2014, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Latala, R.; Oleszkiewicz, K. On the best constant in the Khinchin-Kahane inequality. Studia Math. 1994, 109, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  21. Szarek, S.J. On the best constants in the Khinchin inequality. Studia Math. 1976, 58, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces Vol. I; Johnson, W.B., Lindenstrauss, J., Eds.; North-Holland Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, 2001; p. x+1005. [Google Scholar]
  23. Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces; Johnson, W.B., Lindenstrauss, J., Eds.; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 2003; Vol. 2, p. xii+1866. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, D.; Queffelec, H. Introduction to Banach spaces: analysis and probability. In Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2018; Vol. 1; Vol. 166, p. xxx+431. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, D.; Queffelec, H. Introduction to Banach spaces: analysis and probability. In Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2018; Vol. 2, p. xxx+374. [Google Scholar]
  26. Diestel, J.; Jarchow, H.; Tonge, A. Absolutely summing operators. In Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1995; Vol. 43, p. xvi+474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ivanisvili, P.; van Handel, R.; Volberg, A. Rademacher type and Enflo type coincide. Ann. Math. (2) 2020, 192, 665–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maurey, B. Type, cotype and K-convexity. In Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 2003; Volume 2, pp. 1299–1332. [Google Scholar]
  29. Enflo, P. On the nonexistence of uniform homeomorphisms between Lp-spaces. Ark. Mat. 1970, 8, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mendel, M.; Naor, A. Metric cotype. Ann. Math. (2) 2008, 168, 247–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bourgain, J.; Milman, V.; Wolfson, H. On type of metric spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1986, 294, 295–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ball, K. Markov chains, Riesz transforms and Lipschitz maps. Geom. Funct. Anal. 1992, 2, 137–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Krishna, K.M. Modular Dvoretzky, Type-Cotype, Khinchin-Kahane and Grothendieck Inequality Problems. Preprints 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated