Submitted:
11 April 2026
Posted:
13 April 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction

2. Physical Mechanisms and Governing Equations
2.1. Joule Heating
2.2. Electrothermal and Thermally Induced Electrokinetic Flows
- A quasi-electrostatic description of the AC electric field to obtain time-averaged field magnitudes.
- An energy equation with Joule heating term (eq. 6) to compute temperature fields.
- The Stokes equation (eq. 3) with an electrothermal body-force density expressed in terms of gradients of conductivity and permittivity [32], as:
2.3. Conjugate Heat Transfer and Boundary Effects
2.4. Thermal Effects in Droplet-Based Electrokinetics
2.5. Nanofluidic Thermal Transport
| Ref. | Flow/Actuation Type | Geometry | Working Medium | Thermal effects considered | Methodology | Main Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [21] | EOF, pressure-driven flow | Cylindrical microcannulas |
General |
Viscous dissipation, Joule heating |
Analytical, numerical |
Electrokinetic slip and wall wettability accelerate microannular flow, shorten transients, enhance heat transfer, and strongly affect temperature and entropy generation. |
| [33] | ACET flow | PDMS-glass microchannel with coplanar symmetric electrode | Polystyrene nanoparticles, dispersed in deionized water | ACET | Experimental | ACET flow enables efficient trapping of 100 nm nanoparticles in deionized water, achieving up to 30× concentration enhancement. |
| [22] | Electrokinetic flows with conductivity gradients | Symmetric T-shaped microchannel | Ferrofluid and water | Joule heating | Experimental, numerical | Joule heating under convective conditions increases electric fields for electrokinetic instability, and alters concentration gradient. |
| [23] | Steady EOF | Two-dimensional straight microchannels | General | Joule heating | Analytical | Joule heating significantly affects electroosmotic microchannel heat transfer for channel thickness higher than 20 μm. Nusselt number remains independent of source term for constant surface heat flux. |
| [46] | EOF, pressure-driven flow | Rectangular microchannel | Newtonian liquid | Joule heating | Analytical | Nu increases with the channel aspect ratio, decreases with velocity scale ratio, increases (decreases) with dimensionless Debye-Hückel parameter for surface cooling (heating) for high channel aspect ratio, and increases with higher Joule heating. |
| [29] | ACET flow | PDMS-glass device with coplanar electrodes | Water | ACET | Experimental, numerical | Electrode design strongly affects microfluidic mixing, capture, and heating; optimal designs vary with voltage, while high voltages favor universal mixing. |
| [47] | Steady electrokinetic flow | Two-dimensional straight microchannels | Water | Joule heating | Numerical | Modeled electrokinetic flow and heat transfer in microchannels with finite-volume method. |
| [10] | EOF with time-modulated electric field | Two-dimensional microchannel confined between two infinitely parallel plates | General | Joule heating | Analytical | The effect of Joule heating is limited and can stabilize the flow, through the mechanism due to viscosity variation that produces an out-of-phase contribution to the velocity. |
| [11] | EOF | Tapered porous microchannel | Jeffery fluid | Viscous dissipation | Analytical | Jeffery fluid exhibits higher axial velocity and pressure effects than Newtonian fluid in electroosmotic tapered porous flow. Velocity increases with Darcy number but decreases with nonuniformity; electroosmosis and Brinkman number notably influence temperature and bolus formation. |
| [48] | EOF | Miltimembrane microchannel | Jeffery fluid | General heat source/sink | Analytical, numerical | Nu increases with an increase in the heat source parameter. With an increase in time phase-lag, Nu of the first membrane increases and that of the second membrane remains constant. |
| [49] | Electroosmotic entry flow | Straight microchannel with end reservoirs | 5 mM phosphate buffer solution | Joule heating | Experimental, numerical | Electrothermal circulations generates at the reservoir–microchannel junction from Joule heating–induced property gradients under amplified electric fields, and the effect of electroosmotic entry flow is increases as AC voltage rises at fixed DC voltage. |
| [50] | AC electrokinetic flow | Straight microchannel | water at various electrical conductivities | Joule heating | Experimental, numerical | Demonstrated the N-LIFT, requiring a single dye, to characterize the Joule heating, and the experiments verified the trend that the temperature is proportional to the square of the applied voltage. |
| [51] | EOF, pressure-driven flow | Two-dimensional microchannel confined between two infinitely parallel plates | General | Joule heating | Analytical | For a given flow rate, Nu computed for a combined pressure-electroosmotically driven flow can reach up to approximately five times that of the pressure driven flow. |
| [16] | EOF, pressure-driven flow | Circular microchannel with circumferentially heterogeneous surface properties | General | Joule heating | Analytical, numerical | The average Nu increases as the region with higher heat flux expands and as the zeta potential of the lower-charge region increases, reaching a maximum when both heat flux and zeta potential are uniformly distributed along the channel wall. |
| [15] | Capillary electrophoresis | Circular capillary | NaCl electrolyte with fluorescein dye as the sample species | Joule heating | Numerical | Joule heating becomes significant at high voltages and large capillary radii. Joule heating raises solution temperature, reduces viscosity and conductivity, accelerating sample migration. Simultaneously, it alters diffusion, electrophoretic mobility, and electroosmotic velocity profiles, causing band distortion, peak reduction, broadening, and deviation from plug-like transport. |
| [52] | EOF, pressure-driven flow | Rectangular microchannel heat sink | Water | Joule heating | Numerical | Developed a model for optimization of electroosmotically assisted pressure-driven microchannel heat sink. |
| [53] | Electrokinetic flow with logitudinal electric field and transverse magnetic field | Rotating microchannel | General | Viscous dissipation, Joule heating | Analytical, numerical | Hydrodynamic boundary layers shrink, and sharp variations appear in the EDL region at high rotational speeds. The Hall parameter lowers fluid temperature at low Hartmann number (Ha = 1) but increases it at higher Ha. Nusselt number asymptotics are examined across Brinkman and Joule heating ranges. |
| [4] | ACET flow with multi-phase actuation | Rectangular microchannel with planar electrodes | Phosphate buffered saline | ACET | Numerical | Electrothermal simulations under single-, 2-, 3-, and 4-phase actuation are reported. Maximum flow rate is obtained for 2-phase; 3-phase and 4-phase show 5% and 11% lower flow rates, respectively, relative to 2-phase. |
| [1] | AC multiple array electrothermal micropump | Microchannels with square, circular, and triangular cross sections | Phosphate buffered saline | ACET | Experimental, numerical | An AC MAET micropump with side-wall microelectrode arrays is introduced. Multiple actuation modes are examined numerically and experimentally. Performance is strongly influenced by electrode configuration and phasing, enabling high-flow, high-precision micropumping for conductive fluids in lab-on-chip and drug delivery applications. |
| [3] | ACET flow | 2D rectangular microchannel with electrodes at the bottom | 1 μm particles in phosphate buffered saline | ACET | Experimental, numerical | Parametric effects on ACET pumping in microchannels are examined via simulations and experiments, with optimization using Design Expert and an OpenFOAM solver. Increasing electrode gap 3-times reduces velocity by 40%, increasing small electrode size 4-times reduces velocity by 288%, and increasing channel height raises velocity by 40% before plateau. |
| [54] | ACET flow | ACET micropump with asymmetric electrodes | KCl solution | ACET | Numerical | A fully coupled ACET model with temperature-dependent properties is developed and compared with a decoupled model. Agreement is obtained at low temperature rise, while discrepancies increase with temperature. The decoupled model underestimates temperature and velocity. Critical frequencies shift higher with increasing applied voltage. |
| [55] | ACET flow with slip velocity on wall | 2D rectangular microchannel with electrodes at the bottom | Water | ACET | Numerical | The slip velocity at the channel wall significantly influences the flow field. The presence of slip at the wall increases shear stress, thereby improving pumping efficiency. A larger slip length leads to a higher average pumping velocity. With a glass substrate, the effect of slip velocity became more pronounced. |
| [56] | EOF, Electrophoresis | Rectangular PDMS microchannels | Sodium bicarbonate buffer solution | Joule heating | Experimental, numerical | Joule heating alters the typical plug-like EOF profile. Simulations show that it accelerates sample transport and distorts the sample band, with effects being more pronounced in PDMS/PDMS channels compared to glass/PDMS channels. |
| [57] | EOF | Electrokinetic separation chip | 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) solution | Joule heating, conjugate heat transfer | Experimental, numerical | Experimental (IR thermography) and computational results for electrokinetic chip temperatures are presented. IR measurements provide sub-second resolution with 30 μm spot size. Model accuracy is within ±1 °C. Surface temperatures reflect channel values with an average offset of 1–2 °C under real operating conditions. |
| [58] | ACET microvortex | Parallel plate electrodes with double-sided tape as spacer | 1 μm polystyrene bead suspended in KCl-Tween20 solution | ACET | Experimental, numerical | Transient electrothermal vortices induced by optical heating were investigated using μ-PIV and COMSOL modeling. A 980 nm laser scanned over a colloidal suspension between AC-driven electrodes to generate vortices. Superposed axisymmetric vortices visualized fluid motion in custom rapid electrokinetic patterning (REP) traps, revealing constraints of superposition in dynamic configurations. |
| [59] | EOF, Electrophoresis | Cylindrical capillary | General | Joule heating | Analytical | Thermal end effects cause sharp temperature drops near capillary ends, leading to localized electric field intensification and pressure gradients for mass continuity. The resulting curved velocity profile and enhanced diffusion increase sample dispersion, while Joule heating accelerates sample transport, thereby shortening electrophoretic analysis time. |
| [60] | EOF, Electrophoresis | Cylindrical capillary | Tetraborate buffer solutions (pH 9.2) | Joule heating | Experimental | Heat dissipation in glass microdevices is comparable to liquid-cooled fused silica capillaries. Electric field strengths 5–10× higher can be applied before efficiency degrades. Joule heating mainly induces radial temperature gradients, while bulk temperature rise has minor effects; active cooling improves reproducibility and prevents boiling. |
4. Characterization of Thermal Effects
4.1. Analytical and Reduced-Order Models

4.2. Numerical Simulation of Coupled Electro-Thermo-Hydrodynamics

4.3. Experimental Diagnostics for Temperature and Flow Fields
| Ref. | Application | Materials and Microfluidic Device | Mechanism | Methodology | Main Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [71] | Localized micro/nano-electroporation | FAM-labeled oligonucleotides and GFP plasmids as cargos, in 1× PBS buffer. Nano- and microchannel array. | Joule heating | Experimental, numerical | Demonstrated coupling among electric field, Joule heating, electroosmosis (EO), and electrophoresis (EP) in micro/nano-electroporation (MEP/NEP) across varying channel sizes. Single-cell electrokinetic behaviors are analyzed using a microfluidic biochip. Joule heating induces bubble formation, driven by EO toward the cargo side. Increased voltage intensifies EO, reducing cargo delivery efficiency, especially for low-mobility plasmid DNA. An optimal electroporation zone is defined to minimize bubble generation and excessive EO effects. |
| [72] | Particle manipulation with ACET flow | Polystyrene particles dispersed in KCl. Parallel plate electrodes with double-sided tape as spacer | ACET | Experimental, numerical | An electrokinetic technique is developed to continuously and energy-efficiently manipulate colloidal particles using intrinsic Joule heating. Alternating current electrothermal flows, driven by non-uniform electric and thermal fields, generate strong vortices that concentrate particles at localized hotspots. By tuning hotspot geometry, diverse particle aggregation patterns are formed under low power conditions. |
| [2] | General microfluidic flow with parallel heating channels carrying ionic liquids for in-situ temperature monitoring | Ionic liquids BMIM Imide and BMIM PF6. Meandering PDMS microfluidic channel with co-running heating channel | Joule heating | Experimental | Microfluidic devices enabling localized heating of microchannels were designed, fabricated, and tested. Achieved intra-channel temperature control within ±0.2 °C. Ionic liquids in adjacent channels are Joule-heated with AC current, allowing direct and convenient assessment of internal temperatures. |
| [6] | controlling polymerase chain reaction (PCR) thermal cycling in a microchannel using Joule heating | PCR mixture of DNA template, GeneAmp® 1 × PCR Gold Buffer, 3.0 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dGTP, dCTP, dTTP, and dATP (each), 0.25 μM each primer and 0.1 μM probe. Rectangular microfluidic PCR chip |
Joule heating | Experimental, numerical | A Joule heating-based method for PCR thermal cycling in a PDMS microchannel was developed, eliminating external heaters. Internal heating from current flow enabled controlled cycling at only 1.3 W power consumption. Numerical simulations guided parameter selection, and a two-temperature TaqMan real-time PCR successfully amplified the E. coli O157:H7 stx1 DNA fragment. |
| [73] | Temperature control during capillary electrophoresis (CE) separations for spaceflight applications | Mixture of inorganic cations and amino acids using 5 M acetic acid as background electrolytes. Capillary wrapped in a “figure-of-eight” profile |
Joule heating | Experimental, numerical | A solid-state capillary temperature control device was developed for integration into in situ instruments. Two prototypes, a thermal mass model (TMM) and a functional model (FM), were tested. The TMM validated gradient minimization and model reliability, while the FM achieved CE analytical performance under active control and thermal-vacuum conditions. |
| [74] | cascade EOF micropump for chip cooling | Infinite parallel plates | forced convection by EOF | Analytical, numerical | A 3D-printed ABS cartridge with inner copper foil (0.2 mm thick) was designed to enhance the capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometer interface by directing thermostated airflow for efficient Joule heat dissipation along the silica capillary. The cartridge supports up to two capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detectors (C⁴Ds). For monoethyl carbonate separation, peak area reduced by 21% of the original, confirming superior thermal management. |
| [7] | active cooling micro-channel heat sink device using EOF | 0.4 mM borax buffer. Straight rectangular microchannels etched in silicon |
forced convection by EOF | Experimental, numerical | An EOF-driven setup achieved 82 μL/min at 400 V, eliminating high-pressure pumping. Cooling fluid temperature rises of 9.6 °C, 29.9 °C, 54.3 °C, and 80.1 °C occurred for 0.4 W, 1.2 W, 2.1 W, and 4 W, respectively; substrate temperature remained below 80.5 °C. Nu reached a maximum of 5.48 at the channel entrance, 4.56 for the rest of the channel, at 4 W, ~10% higher than pressure-driven flow. |
| [5] | DEP-based micropump for electronics thermal management | 2.9 μm polystyrene particles dispersed in water. Three-phase planer microelectrode array, for generating travelling-wave DEP. |
Forced convection by travelling wave DEP | Experimental, numerical | A microfluidic pumping method based on traveling-wave dielectrophoresis (twDEP) of microparticles was developed. Particle motion in non-uniform electric fields generates viscous drag, driving fluid flow. Numerical simulations and μ-PIV experiments quantified and validated the induced flow field. The twDEP micropumping concept shows strong potential for chip-integrated thermal management applications. |
| [14] | wearable sensor patch for biofluid monitoring | Microfluidic sweat collection in textile, spray-coated with M-Xene. Laser-engraved PDMS-based microfluidic device. |
Joule heating for inducing sweat, and subsequent rapid sweat uptake by graphene-based sensors for biomarker analysis | Experimental | A sensor patch was developed for Joule-heating–induced sweating and comfortable biofluid monitoring. Ti₃C₂Tₓ nanosheets impart high electrical conductivity to silk fabrics, enabling an efficient low-voltage electrothermal platform. The biosensor triggers noticeable sweating within 5 minutes via mild thermal stimulation, permitting real-time monitoring of Na⁺, K⁺, pH, and uric acid for metabolic syndrome assessment. |
5. Application-Driven Perspectives
5.1. Bioanalytical and Lab-on-Chip Systems

5.2. Microelectronics Cooling and Thermal Management

5.4. Particle and Cell Manipulation
5.5. Wearable Diagnostics and Emerging Platforms
5.6. Cross-Cutting Design Considerations
- Buffer and electrolyte optimization: Low ionic strength to reduce Joule heating, with temperature-stable properties.
- Geometry and electrode design: Tapered channels, interdigitated electrodes, and multiphase ACET to redistribute heating and flows.
- Materials selection: High thermal conductivity substrates (e.g., silicon, diamond-like carbon) and coatings for thermal slip.
- Hybrid actuation: Combining electrokinetics with pressure, acoustics, or magnetohydrodynamics to offload pumping while minimizing electrical heating.
6. Open Questions and Future Directions
- Accurate, temperature-dependent property data for real biofluids, buffers, and nanofluids over the relevant temperature and frequency ranges.
- Capturing surface heterogeneity, random roughness, and dynamic zeta potential in microfabricated channels, which can locally distort fields and heat generation.
- Handling strong coupling and potential instabilities when Joule heating significantly alters conductivity and permittivity, especially at high electric fields.
- Incorporating non-Newtonian and multiphase effects, as in Jeffery fluids, hybrid nanofluids, and blood-like suspensions, which modify both hydrodynamics and thermal transport.
- Benchmarking: Standardized test cases for electroosmotic Poiseuille–Couette flows with Joule heating, ACET vortex formation, and conjugate heat transfer across materials.
- Open datasets: Shared high-resolution temperature, velocity, and current measurements for model training and validation.
- Design guidelines: Dimensionless maps correlating operating conditions, geometry, and performance metrics (e.g., Nusselt number, thermal resistance, coefficient of performance) for electrokinetic microdevices.
- Interdisciplinary collaboration: Merging microfluidics expertise with materials science, ML, and systems engineering to tackle multiscale thermal challenges.
7. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ACET | AC Electrothermal |
| CFD | Computational Fluid Dynamics |
| EDL | Electric double layer |
| EOF | Electroosmotic flow |
| NS | Navier-Stokes |
| PNP | Poisson–Nernst–Planck |
References
- Salari, M. Navi, and C. Dalton, “A novel alternating current multiple array electrothermal micropump for lab-on-a-chip applications,” Biomicrofluidics, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 014113, Feb. 2015. [CrossRef]
- J. de Mello, M. Habgood, N. L. Lancaster, T. Welton, and R. C. R. Wootton, “Precise temperature control in microfluidic devices using Joule heating of ionic liquids,” Lab. Chip, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 417–419, Oct. 2004. [CrossRef]
- R. Moradi, A. Ramiar, and A. Ghasemi, “Numerical and Experimental Investigation of AC Electrothermal Flow Pumping in Microfluidic Devices: Influence of Electrode Pair Count on Velocity,” Sens. Actuators Phys., vol. 382, p. 116155, Feb. 2025. [CrossRef]
- S. Cenaiko, T. Lijnse, and C. Dalton, “Multiphase Actuation of AC Electrothermal Micropump,” Micromachines, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 758, Apr. 2023. [CrossRef]
- D. Liu and S. V. Garimella, “Microfluidic pumping based on dielectrophoresis for thermal management of microelectronics,” in 2008 11th Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, May 2008, pp. 545–554. [CrossRef]
- G. Hu, Q. Xiang, R. Fu, B. Xu, R. Venditti, and D. Li, “Electrokinetically controlled real-time polymerase chain reaction in microchannel using Joule heating effect,” Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 557, no. 1, pp. 146–151, Jan. 2006. [CrossRef]
- M. F. Al-Rjoub, A. K. Roy, S. Ganguli, and R. K. Banerjee, “Assessment of an active-cooling micro-channel heat sink device, using electro-osmotic flow,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 54, no. 21, pp. 4560–4569, Oct. 2011. [CrossRef]
- K. Pramod and A. K. Sen, “Flow and Heat Transfer Analysis of an Electro-Osmotic Flow Micropump for Chip Cooling,” J. Electron. Packag., vol. 136, no. 031012, Jun. 2014. [CrossRef]
- J. Zhang, Z. Zou, and C. Fu, “A Review of the Complex Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics in Microchannels,” Micromachines, vol. 14, no. 7, Jul. 2023. [CrossRef]
- M.-H. Chang and G. M. Homsy, “Effects of Joule heating on the stability of time-modulated electro-osmotic flow,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 074107, Jul. 2005. [CrossRef]
- S. Noreen, K. Fatima, and D. Tripathi, “Electroosmosis-driven heat transfer in Jeffrey fluid flow through tapered porous channel,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part Appl., vol. 85, no. 15, pp. 2473–2497, Aug. 2024. [CrossRef]
- J. Wang et al., “Microfluidic-based electrically driven particle manipulation techniques for biomedical applications,” RSC Adv., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 167–198, 2025. [CrossRef]
- S. Fande, S. K. Pavar, and S. Goel, “Recent trends in electro-microfluidic devices for wireless monitoring of biomarker levels,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 126, no. 4, p. 040502, Jan. 2025. [CrossRef]
- X. Li, X. He, X. Yang, G. Tian, C. Liu, and T. Xu, “A wearable sensor patch for joule-heating sweating and comfortable biofluid monitoring,” Sens. Actuators B Chem., vol. 419, p. 136399, Nov. 2024. [CrossRef]
- G. Y. Tang, C. Yang, H. Q. Gong, J. C. Chai, and Y. C. Lam, “Numerical simulation of Joule heating effect on sample band transport in capillary electrophoresis,” Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 561, no. 1, pp. 138–149, Mar. 2006. [CrossRef]
- M. Azari, A. Sadeghi, and S. Chakraborty, “Electroosmotic flow and heat transfer in a heterogeneous circular microchannel,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 87, pp. 640–654, Nov. 2020. [CrossRef]
- J. Kirby, Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. [CrossRef]
- A. Gubbiotti, M. Baldelli, G. Di Muccio, P. Malgaretti, S. Marbach, and M. Chinappi, “Electroosmosis in nanopores: computational methods and technological applications,” Adv. Phys. X, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2036638, Dec. 2022. [CrossRef]
- L. Joly, C. Ybert, E. Trizac, and L. Bocquet, “Liquid friction on charged surfaces: From hydrodynamic slippage to electrokinetics,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 125, no. 20, Nov. 2006. [CrossRef]
- E. Lauga, M. Brenner, and H. Stone, “Microfluidics: The No-Slip Boundary Condition,” in Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 1219–1240. [CrossRef]
- Q. Zhan and S. Deng, “Transient pressure-driven electrokinetic slip flow and heat transfer through a microannulus,” AIP Adv., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 045224, Apr. 2023. [CrossRef]
- L. Song, L. Yu, C. Brumme, R. Shaw, C. Zhang, and X. Xuan, “Joule heating effects on electrokinetic flows with conductivity gradients,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 42, no. 7–8, pp. 967–974, 2021. [CrossRef]
- K. Horiuchi and P. Dutta, “Joule heating effects in electroosmotically driven microchannel flows,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 47, no. 14, pp. 3085–3095, Jul. 2004. [CrossRef]
- X. Xuan, “Joule heating in electrokinetic flow,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 2008. [CrossRef]
- A. Alizadeh, W.-L. Hsu, M. Wang, and H. Daiguji, “Electroosmotic flow: From microfluidics to nanofluidics,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 42, no. 7–8, pp. 834–868, 2021. [CrossRef]
- J.-L. BARRAT and F. CHIARUTTINI, “Kapitza resistance at the liquid—solid interface,” Mol. Phys., vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 1605–1610, Jun. 2003. [CrossRef]
- “Interfacial thermal resistance: Past, present, and future | Rev. Mod. Phys.” Accessed: Mar. 16, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://journals.aps.org/rmp/abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.025002.
- A. Ramos, H. Morgan, N. G. Green, and A. Castellanos, “Ac electrokinetics: a review of forces in microelectrode structures,” J. Phys. Appl. Phys., vol. 31, no. 18, p. 2338, Sep. 1998. [CrossRef]
- Z. Bouchaar, Y. T. Set, L. Lagae, and C. D. M. Campos, “Study of AC Electrothermal Effect in Microfluidics,” IEEE Sens. Lett., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1–4, Jul. 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. Salari, M. Navi, T. Lijnse, and C. Dalton, “AC Electrothermal Effect in Microfluidics: A Review,” Micromachines, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 762, Nov. 2019. [CrossRef]
- H. Morgan and N. G. Green, “AC electrokinetics : colloids and nanoparticles,” Art. no. 25921, 2003, Accessed: Mar. 27, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:25921.
- N. G. Green, A. Ramos, A. González, H. Morgan, and A. Castellanos, “Fluid flow induced by nonuniform ac electric fields in electrolytes on microelectrodes. I. Experimental measurements,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 4011–4018, Apr. 2000. [CrossRef]
- A. Abdelghany, Y. Ichikawa, and M. Motosuke, “AC electrothermal trapping for efficient nanoparticles enrichment in a microchannel,” Int. J. Thermofluids, vol. 23, p. 100736, Aug. 2024. [CrossRef]
- P. Anzini, Z. Filiberti, and A. Parola, “Fluid flow at interfaces driven by thermal gradients,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 106, no. 2, p. 024116, Aug. 2022. [CrossRef]
- P. Anzini, G. M. Colombo, Z. Filiberti, and A. Parola, “Thermal Forces from a Microscopic Perspective,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 123, no. 2, p. 028002, Jul. 2019. [CrossRef]
- T. Tsuji, S. Mei, and S. Taguchi, “Thermo-osmotic slip flows around a thermophoretic microparticle characterized by optical trapping of tracers,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 20, no. 5, p. 054061, Nov. 2023. [CrossRef]
- K. Proesmans and D. Frenkel, “Comparing theory and simulation for thermo-osmosis,” J. Chem. Phys., vol. 151, no. 12, p. 124109, Sep. 2019. [CrossRef]
- Kundu and S. Saha, “Review and Analysis of Electro-Magnetohydrodynamic Flow and Heat Transport in Microchannels,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 19, p. 7017, Jan. 2022. [CrossRef]
- J.-T. Cheng and C.-L. Chen, “Active thermal management of on-chip hot spots using EWOD-driven droplet microfluidics,” Exp. Fluids, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1349–1357, Dec. 2010. [CrossRef]
- Z. Yan, M. Jin, Z. Li, G. Zhou, and L. Shui, “Droplet-Based Microfluidic Thermal Management Methods for High Performance Electronic Devices,” Micromachines, vol. 10, no. 2, Jan. 2019. [CrossRef]
- S.-Y. Park and Y. Nam, “Single-Sided Digital Microfluidic (SDMF) Devices for Effective Coolant Delivery and Enhanced Two-Phase Cooling,” Micromachines, vol. 8, no. 1, Dec. 2016. [CrossRef]
- M. Taghipoor, A. Bertsch, and P. Renaud, “Thermal control of ionic transport and fluid flow in nanofluidic channels,” Nanoscale, vol. 7, no. 44, pp. 18799–18804, Nov. 2015. [CrossRef]
- M. Taghipoor, A. Bertsch, and P. Renaud, “Temperature Sensitivity of Nanochannel Electrical Conductance,” ACS Nano, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 4563–4571, Apr. 2015. [CrossRef]
- Jelinek, S. D. Felicelli, P. F. Mlakar, and J. F. Peters, “Molecular Dynamics Study of Temperature Effects on Electrokinetic Transport in Si Nanochannel,”. [CrossRef]
- S. (সুমনচক্রবর্তী) Chakraborty, C. (চিরদীপ বাকলী) Bakli, D. (দেবমাল্য রায়) Roy, A. (অভিরূপ চৌধুরী) Chaudhuri, A. (অনিরুদ্ধ গুহ) Guha, and A. (आदित्य पटवारी) Patwari, “Electrokinetic energy harvesting over nanometer and sub-nanometer scales,” Appl. Phys. Rev., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 011305, Jan. 2025. [CrossRef]
- A. Sadeghi, Y. Kazemi, and M. H. Saidi, “Joule Heating Effects In Electrokinetically Driven Flow Through Rectangular Microchannels: An Analytical Approach,” Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys. Eng., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 173–193, Aug. 2013. [CrossRef]
- P. S. Glockner and G. F. Naterer, “Numerical Simulation of Electrokinetic Flow and Heat Transfer in Microchannels with a Finite-Volume Method,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part Appl., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 451–470, Aug. 2006. [CrossRef]
- H. (ಹನುಮೇಶ್ ವೈದ್ಯ) Vaidya, R. V. (ರಾಜಶೇಖರ ವಿ ಚೌಧರಿ) Choudhari, K. V. (ಕೆ. ವಿ. ಪ್ರಸಾದ್) Prasad, and M. (ಮಹಾಲಿಂಗಪ್ಪ ನಾಗನೂರ) Naganur, “Electro-osmotic flow and heat transfer in Jeffery fluid: A multi-membrane microchannel model,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 36, no. 11, p. 111904, Nov. 2024. [CrossRef]
- R. A. Prabhakaran et al., “Joule heating effects on electroosmotic entry flow,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 572–579, 2017. [CrossRef]
- S. J. Williams, P. Chamarthy, and S. T. Wereley, “Comparison of Experiments and Simulation of Joule Heating in ac Electrokinetic Chips,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 132, no. 021103, Feb. 2010. [CrossRef]
- A. Q. Zade, M. T. Manzari, and S. K. Hannani, “An analytical solution for thermally fully developed combined pressure – electroosmotically driven flow in microchannels,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1087–1096, Mar. 2007. [CrossRef]
- Husain and K.-Y. Kim, “Analysis and optimization of electrokinetic microchannel heat sink,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 52, no. 21, pp. 5271–5275, Oct. 2009. [CrossRef]
- Mallick, “Thermofluidic characteristics of electrokinetic flow in a rotating microchannel in presence of ion slip and Hall currents,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 126, p. 105350, Jul. 2021. [CrossRef]
- F. J. Hong, F. Bai, and P. Cheng, “Numerical simulation of AC electrothermal micropump using a fully coupled model,” Microfluid. Nanofluidics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 411–420, Sep. 2012. [CrossRef]
- F. Echouchene, T. Al-shahrani, and H. Belmabrouk, “Simulation of the Slip Velocity Effect in an AC Electrothermal Micropump,” Micromachines, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 825, Sep. 2020. [CrossRef]
- G. Tang, D. Yan, C. Yang, H. Gong, C. Chai, and Y. Lam, “Joule heating and its effects on electrokinetic transport of solutes in rectangular microchannels,” Sens. Actuators Phys., vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 221–232, Sep. 2007. [CrossRef]
- T. Sikanen et al., “Temperature modeling and measurement of an electrokinetic separation chip,” Microfluid. Nanofluidics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 479–491, Oct. 2008. [CrossRef]
- K. Gupta, Z. Chen, S. J. Williams, and S. T. Wereley, “Time-resolved particle image velocimetry analysis and computational modeling of transient optically induced electrothermal micro vortex,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 42, no. 23, pp. 2483–2489, 2021. [CrossRef]
- X. Xuan and D. Li, “Analytical study of Joule heating effects on electrokinetic transportation in capillary electrophoresis,” J. Chromatogr. A, vol. 1064, no. 2, pp. 227–237, Feb. 2005. [CrossRef]
- N. J. Petersen, R. P. H. Nikolajsen, K. B. Mogensen, and J. P. Kutter, “Effect of Joule heating on efficiency and performance for microchip-based and capillary-based electrophoretic separation systems: A closer look,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 253–269, 2004. [CrossRef]
- M. McCormack, F. Fang, and J. Zhang, “Numerical Analysis of Microchannels Designed for Heat Sinks,” Nanomanufacturing Metrol., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 354–369, Dec. 2022. [CrossRef]
- T. L. Sounart and J. C. Baygents, “Electrically-driven fluid motion in channels with streamwise gradients of the electrical conductivity,” Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 59–75, Dec. 2001. [CrossRef]
- Yang, C. B. Ng, and V. Chan, “Transient Analysis of Electroosmotic Flow in a Slit Microchannel,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 248, no. 2, pp. 524–527, Apr. 2002. [CrossRef]
- L. Ren and D. Li, “Electroosmotic Flow in Heterogeneous Microchannels,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 243, no. 1, pp. 255–261, Nov. 2001. [CrossRef]
- M. Shamshiri, R. Khazaeli, M. Ashrafizaadeh, and S. Mortazavi, “Heat transfer and entropy generation analyses associated with mixed electrokinetically induced and pressure-driven power-law microflows,” Energy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 157–169, Jun. 2012. [CrossRef]
- M. O. Oni and B. K. Jha, “Entropy generation analysis of electroosmotic mixed convection flow in vertical microannulus with asymmetric heat fluxes,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 145, p. 106813, Jun. 2023. [CrossRef]
- M. Wang and Q. Kang, “Electrokinetic Transport in Microchannels with Random Roughness,” Anal. Chem., vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 2953–2961, Apr. 2009. [CrossRef]
- Ross, M. Gaitan, and L. E. Locascio, “Temperature Measurement in Microfluidic Systems Using a Temperature-Dependent Fluorescent Dye,” Anal. Chem., vol. 73, no. 17, pp. 4117–4123, Sep. 2001. [CrossRef]
- M. Basson and T. S. Pottebaum, “Measuring the temperature of fluid in a micro-channel using thermochromic liquid crystals,” Exp. Fluids, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 803–814, Sep. 2012. [CrossRef]
- R. Smith, D. R. Sabatino, and T. J. Praisner, “Temperature sensing with thermochromic liquid crystals,” Exp. Fluids, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 190–201, Feb. 2001. [CrossRef]
- J. Pan et al., “Joule heating and electroosmotic flow in cellular micro/nano electroporation,” Lab. Chip, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 819–831, Feb. 2024. [CrossRef]
- G. Kunti, J. Dhar, A. Bhattacharya, and S. Chakraborty, “Joule heating-induced particle manipulation on a microfluidic chip,” Biomicrofluidics, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 014113, Feb. 2019. [CrossRef]
- A. B. Berg, M. S. Ferreira Santos, A. Bautista, M. F. Mora, M. T. Pauken, and A. C. Noell, “Development of a capillary temperature control system for capillary electrophoresis instruments designed for spaceflight applications,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 45, no. 17–18, pp. 1495–1504, 2024. [CrossRef]
- K. J. M. Francisco and C. L. do Lago, “Improving thermal control of capillary electrophoresis with mass spectrometry and capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection by using 3D printed cartridges,” Talanta, vol. 185, pp. 37–41, Aug. 2018. [CrossRef]
- B. Cetin and D. Li, “Effect of Joule heating on electrokinetic transport,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 994–1005, 2008. [CrossRef]
- K. Swinney and D. J. Bornhop, “Quantification and evaluation of Joule heating in on-chip capillary electrophoresis,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 613–620, 2002. [CrossRef]
- J. H. Knox, “Thermal effects and band spreading in capillary electro-separation,” Chromatographia, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 329–337, Dec. 1988. [CrossRef]
- Eli. Grushka, R. M. McCormick, and J. J. Kirkland, “Effect of temperature gradients on the efficiency of capillary zone electrophoresis separations,” Anal. Chem., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 241–246, Feb. 1989. [CrossRef]
- A. Ramachandran and J. G. Santiago, “Isotachophoresis: Theory and Microfluidic Applications,” Chem. Rev., vol. 122, no. 15, pp. 12904–12976, Aug. 2022. [CrossRef]
- J. Cao, P. Cheng, and F. Hong, “Applications of electrohydrodynamics and Joule heating effects in microfluidic chips: A review,” Sci. China Ser. E Technol. Sci., vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3477–3490, Dec. 2009. [CrossRef]
- V. Kordzadeh-Kermani, M. Madadelahi, S. N. Ashrafizadeh, L. Kulinsky, S. O. Martinez-Chapa, and M. J. Madou, “Electrified lab on disc systems: A comprehensive review on electrokinetic applications,” Biosens. Bioelectron., vol. 214, p. 114381, Oct. 2022. [CrossRef]
- K. Ramesh and J. Prakash, “Thermal analysis for heat transfer enhancement in electroosmosis-modulated peristaltic transport of Sutterby nanofluids in a microfluidic vessel,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 1311–1326, Oct. 2019. [CrossRef]
- M. F. Al-Rjoub, A. K. Roy, S. Ganguli, and R. K. Banerjee, “Enhanced heat transfer in a micro-scale heat exchanger using nano-particle laden electro-osmotic flow,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 68, pp. 228–235, Nov. 2015. [CrossRef]
- M. Bilal et al., “Dissipated electroosmotic EMHD hybrid nanofluid flow through the micro-channel,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 4771, Mar. 2022. [CrossRef]
- H. Tabasum, N. Gill, R. Mishra, and S. Lone, “Wearable microfluidic-based e-skin sweat sensors,” RSC Adv., vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 8691–8707, 2022. [CrossRef]
- C.-B. Ma et al., “Emerging Multifunctional Wearable Sensors: Integrating Multimodal Sweat Analysis and Advanced Material Technologies for Next-Generation Health Monitoring,” ACS Sens., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2388–2408, Apr. 2025. [CrossRef]
- M. Wang, J. Zheng, G. Zhang, S. Lu, and J. Zhou, “Wearable Electrochemical Glucose Sensors for Fluid Monitoring: Advances and Challenges in Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Technologies,” Biosensors, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 309, May 2025. [CrossRef]
- Xu, M. Yan, and Y. Xie, “Energy harvesting from water streaming at charged surface,” ELECTROPHORESIS, vol. 45, no. 3–4, pp. 244–265, 2024. [CrossRef]
- A. E. Giannakopoulos, F. Sofos, T. E. Karakasidis, and A. Liakopoulos, “A quasi-continuum multi-scale theory for self-diffusion and fluid ordering in nanochannel flows,” Microfluid. Nanofluidics, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1011–1023, Dec. 2014. [CrossRef]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).