3. Results & Discussion
The findings from the interviews demonstrate that migration journeys are rarely linear or predictable. Instead, they are defined by a mix of external pressures, forced choices, and overwhelming danger. The analysis is structured across the four core themes identified in the data.
A. Root Causes and Triggers
The decision to migrate, for over half of the participants, was not precipitated by a slow decline in quality of life but by a rapid erosion of safety and opportunity, rendering life in their home country impossible. This represents an existential threat—a situation where survival, rather than prosperity, becomes the driving force.
1. Political Collapse and Targeted Violence
For participants from Afghanistan, the root cause was unambiguous and acute. The Taliban takeover in 2021 immediately triggered a mass exodus, particularly among those with prior affiliations to U.S. or Western entities. One highly educated Afghan male, Emad, who undertook a grueling journey through ten countries, stated that his primary motivation was the future and education of his children. The sudden shift in political control meant not only a loss of status or opportunity but a direct threat to the family’s security and worldview. Similarly, in non-conflict zones, political instability and widespread civil insecurity played a central role. Participants from countries such as Venezuela, cited systemic governmental dysfunction and economic collapse as the primary drivers. For Santiago, a Venezuelan male who arrived with his wife and 8-year-old son, the decision was driven by a situation that could not be resolved: "the economic and social situation, including a lack of work, insufficient income, and issues with government and corruption." When the social contract breaks down to this degree, the country ceases to offer the basic scaffolding required for family survival, forcing a relocation decision.
2. Localized Gang and Social Violence
Localized, targeted violence, often perpetrated by non-state actors like gangs, was cited as a powerful displacement agent, particularly for Central American participants. The threat of gang recruitment, extortion, and inter-gang warfare created micro-security zones that were impossible to navigate safely. One Salvadoran female interviewee, Isabella, described the severe, almost impossible geographical division and danger within her childhood neighborhood, where identity was linked to territorial control. She explained the high-stakes environment, "where I lived, I was from one gang, and [my neighbor] was from the other... so there it became dangerous." This scenario illustrates how local violence can be as effective as war in forcing a family to flee. The simple act of traversing one's own neighborhood could become a life-threatening boundary crossing, making long-term stability an unreachable goal. The decision to migrate, in this context, is simply a desperate attempt to move from a known, constant battlefield to an unknown, potentially safer territory.
B. Journey Duration and Pathways
The logistics of migration were highly heterogeneous, falling into two broad categories: official, planned migration routes (often relying on legal visas or parole programs) and irregular, unplanned routes that relied on dangerous overland transit. This division highlights a deep disparity in access and privilege within migration.
1. The Privilege of Legal Pathways
For a select group of participants, legal pathways—such as parole programs or existing family/professional ties leading to official visas—provided a mechanism to avoid the most acute physical dangers. Mario arrived in the U.S. through a parole program and expressed immense gratitude for this legal route, contrasting his experience sharply with those forced to cross without authorization. He noted that while his journey avoided the physical dangers of the irregular route, adaptation and the post-arrival struggle were still profound: "Coming to this country and not having anyone to support you is not easy; you suffer because there are not many opportunities when we arrive." This demonstrates that the trauma of migration is decoupled from the physical danger of the journey, the struggle of uprooting remains regardless of the pathway. The narratives reveal that the distinction between "legal" and "irregular" primarily dictates the type of hardship faced, not the absence of hardship.
2. The Irregular and Treacherous Routes
For the majority of participants, the journey took place over many months, through many countries, and was defined by a lack of resources, extreme environmental conditions, and systemic vulnerability to criminals and corrupt officials. Journeys often lasted months, with migrants traversing entire continents. The Darién Gap: This passage, connecting South America to Central America, emerged as a universal symbol of danger and physical endurance for those traveling overland. A Venezuelan male, Adrian, detailed his seven-day ordeal through the jungle, which followed a three-year multi-stage journey through Peru and Chile. He recounted, "the jungle is not for everyone," describing a week of walking "from 5 a.m. to dusk, for seven days," enduring hunger and cold, and surviving only with help from NGOs and indigenous groups in Panama. The Darién Gap is not merely a difficult hike, but a zone of legal and humanitarian void where organized crime and environmental hazards come together to create a life-or-death gauntlet.
The Northern Passage: Even after the Darién, the route through Central America and Mexico presented continuing dangers, including the notorious freight train, known as La Bestia (The Beast). Santiago noted that his treacherous trip involved a "dangerous passage through the jungle and riding atop a train to cross parts of Mexico." Throughout the journey he and his family ran out of food and were exposed to multiple life-threatening risks over the course of the migration.
C. Perceptions of Systemic and Environmental Dangers
The danger perceived and experienced by the migrants was multi-faceted, stemming equally from the natural environment, criminal organizations, and state agents. These dangers were often interconnected, creating a state of vulnerability.
1. The Reality of Violence and Kidnapping
Direct violence was a constant threat, often carried out by criminal groups operating with impunity along known migration corridors. One male participant, Eduardo, vividly recalled his group being targeted by armed individuals. He detailed running through the desert, day and night, to escape being shot at, and ultimately hiding there for days. This episode illustrates the instantaneous and unpredictable nature of encounters on the journey.
Kidnapping and extortion are also particularly prevalent during the journey for many migrants. Mauricio, a male participant from Venezuela, explained that during his journey, “There was a moment when I was going to be kidnapped and they asked me for a certain amount of money.” However, Mauricio did not have the exact amount the kidnappers were demanding; he was able to give them what he had in order to be freed. However, he recounts, “they told me that if I returned to Mexico, they were going to kill me.”1
Javier’s journey was distinctly traumatic as he also faced threats of kidnapping and witnessed violence and death. A group of people that Javier was with was kidnapped, however only some of them were able to hand over the ransom. He explained, “We were kidnapped by a group. They demanded money from us to release us. Most of us didn’t have the money to pay, so they weren’t released. I don’t really know. I mean, I don’t know what happened to those people...We were released because we paid what they demanded. But the others, I don’t know, I honestly don’t know what happened to them.”2 Javier worries about what happened to those who didn’t have money to pay the ransom. He described, “Whoever had money were the ones who got out. They ones who didn’t, well, I don’t know. Because, I mean, there were places where, literally, you’d see dead bodies lying on the ground.”3 While he explains how some of those deaths were due to lack of water and food some of them were “being killed for money.” Javier emphasized how intense this experience was to feel as if you could be killed at any moment all while seeing others suffering. He recounts, “many people were raped in the jungle, along the trail: women, children.” Eduardo, Mauricio, and Javier’s experiences all demonstrate the role of violence and force as normalized and highly organized risks of the irregular route.
2. Extortion and Corruption in State Actors
Critically, the danger was not confined to external criminals; state actors frequently became part of the systemic vulnerability. Multiple participants reported experiences of corruption and extortion by police and immigration officials across multiple countries. After successfully navigating the Darién Gap, Adrian reported that, "[in] Nicaragua...officials extorted us a lot," an example of how state systems actively prey on vulnerable migrants. Another young male, Roberto, reported alleged police corruption in Guatemala, where officers attempted to "plant illegal items in his backpack" during the journey, essentially manufacturing grounds for arrest or extortion.
This phenomenon of corruption was so pervasive that it sometimes started before the migrants even left their home country. Sonia, a Venezuelan migrant, described systemic corruption and extortion at airports in her home country, illustrating that danger begins even before crossing a border, "the guards asked you for money to get on the plane." This kind of incident was so widely recognized that local service providers advised travelers to conceal their international status. She recounted the warning, "the taxis said, if they stop us, say that you are going on a domestic flight because if you say you are on an international flight, the guards will inspect everything and ask us for money." Most alarmingly, this participant also noted the belief that robbers were "connected with people who work in customs, in migration," suggesting that state corruption and organized crime are not separate entities but are frequently integrated into migration. This blurring of lines fundamentally undermines the migrant's ability to seek protection from any authority.
D. Lasting Impacts of the Migration Journey
Beyond the immediate physical dangers, the psychological toll of the migration journey leaves a lasting impact, manifesting both as direct trauma and a unique form of vicarious community trauma.
1. Direct Trauma and Enduring Effects
The sheer endurance required for the journey, including hunger, cold, extreme physical exertion, and constant fear, resulted in significant direct trauma. Santiago and his family running out of food while traversing a dangerous route is a classic example of this acute stress. Mario, who arrived via the legal parole program, related how his brother "nearly died locked in a truck" during his migration journey through an irregular route. Even though Mario was physically safe, the constant awareness of his brother's near-death experience exemplifies how direct trauma is often extended to the immediate family, creating a shared burden of anxiety. The two months Adrian spent in ICE detention after surrender to U.S. authorities also highlight the official, bureaucratic mechanisms that contribute to post-arrival psychological strain, prolonging the vulnerability experienced on the journey.
2. Vicarious Community Trauma
One of the most profound and unique psychological findings is the concept of vicarious community trauma, where the collective narrative of migration danger heavily influences the psychological experience of those who may have had a safer transit. The Salvadoran female, Isabella, who arrived legally and safely, expressed feeling the "trauma of other Salvadorians’ journeys." This suggests that for communities sharing similar origins or migration routes, the stories of violence, death, and disappearance are not merely news reports; they become integrated into the individual's psychological landscape. The migrant internalizes the potential fate they avoided, or the suffering of their peers, which becomes a vicariously lived experience of collective trauma. This phenomenon requires a broadened understanding of trauma assessment and care, recognizing that a "safe" passage does not negate the psychological baggage carried by the migrant from the shared community narrative.