Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

On Equivalences in Calabi–Yau Geometry from String Theory

Submitted:

04 February 2026

Posted:

05 February 2026

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We investigate several equivalence notions arising in the study of Calabi-Yau manifolds and their interactions with ideas from string theory. The focus is on bimeromorphic equivalence in complex geometry, Morita equivalence in noncommutative geometry, and twisted K-theory as a receptacle for D-brane charges in backgrounds with flux. Using tools from derived categories, Fukaya categories, and operator K-theory, we analyze how these equivalences appear across geometric, categorical, and physical frameworks. Particular attention is given to Fujiki class C manifolds, Hilbert C*-modules, and the role of homological mirror symmetry in relating these structures. Several examples and applications are discussed, illustrating how string-motivated constructions provide a unifying perspective on equivalence phenomena in Calabi-Yau geometry.
Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

The study of Calabi–Yau manifolds represents one of the most fertile intersections between modern mathematics and theoretical physics. These Ricci-flat Kähler spaces, whose existence in a fixed Kähler class is guaranteed by Yau’s solution of the Calabi conjecture [4], not only provide canonical metrics in complex differential geometry but also serve as the essential geometric backgrounds for superstring compactifications [11]. The rich structure of Calabi–Yau manifolds gives rise to multiple equivalence relations that reveal deep connections between birational geometry, noncommutative geometry, and generalized cohomology theories. This paper explores three fundamental equivalence concepts: bimeromorphic equivalence in complex geometry [18], Morita equivalence in operator-algebraic/noncommutative geometry [14], and twisted K-theory equivalence in topology and string theory [17,24].

1.1. Historical Context and Motivation

The discovery of mirror symmetry in the late 1980s revolutionized our understanding of Calabi–Yau manifolds, ultimately relating enumerative invariants on one side to variations of Hodge structure on the mirror. The SYZ picture interprets mirror symmetry as a form of fiberwise T-duality [19], while the mathematical synthesis in the book-length treatment of Hori–Katz–Klemm–Pandharipande–Thomas–Vafa–Zaslow provides a broad viewpoint [11]. Kontsevich’s homological mirror symmetry proposal [12] elevated these ideas to a categorical statement, predicting equivalences between D b Coh ( X ) and suitable (derived) Fukaya categories.
Parallel developments in noncommutative geometry, initiated by Connes, provided powerful tools for understanding “spaces” via their algebras of functions and module categories. Morita equivalence, capturing when two (possibly noncommutative) algebras have equivalent categories of (Hilbert) modules, is fundamental both mathematically [14] and physically, where it appears in T-duality and D-brane physics via equivalences of boundary conditions and Chan–Paton data [23,24].
Twisted K-theory (viewed geometrically via bundle gerbes or P U ( H ) -bundles) emerged as the natural receptacle for D-brane charge in backgrounds with NS–NS H-flux [17]. It simultaneously refines cohomological charge formulae and encodes anomaly cancellation constraints, making it a key bridge between topology and string theory [24].

1.1.0.1. Literature roadmap (and citation coverage).

For the complex-geometric/birational side we rely on the foundational results of Fujiki and standard techniques in resolution of singularities [13,18], with the Calabi–Yau metric background provided by Yau [4]. For homological mirror symmetry and its categorical refinements we follow Kontsevich’s proposal and subsequent developments in Fukaya categories and generation criteria [12,21,27,28,30,31], as well as explicit case studies such as elliptic curves [20] and complementary perspectives [11,19,22,29]. On the noncommutative/operator-algebraic side we use the standard references and Morita theory framework [8,14,32], together with continuous-trace and twisting technology [33]. For the string-theoretic interpretation of dualities and D-brane charge we use the categorical viewpoint and K-theoretic classification results [15,16,17,23,24,25,26]. Finally, for related directions and additional examples we include the author’s companion preprints and notes [2,5,6,7,9,10], and for the birational/derived bridge we cite Bridgeland’s flop/derived equivalences [1].
The unification of these three equivalence concepts—bimeromorphic, Morita, and twisted K-theoretic—offers a comprehensive picture of Calabi-Yau geometry and its physical applications. This paper aims to systematically develop these connections, providing new insights into the structure of Calabi-Yau manifolds and their moduli spaces.

1.2. Overview of Main Results

Our main contributions can be summarized as follows:
(1)
We establish a precise correspondence between Fujiki class C manifolds and certain classes of positive currents, extending the Calabi-Yau theorem to non-Kähler settings through the use of pluripotential theory and Monge-Ampère equations on currents.
(2)
We develop a comprehensive framework for understanding Morita equivalence in the context of Hilbert C * -modules, with applications to KK-theory and string theory dualities. We prove several new results relating Morita equivalence of noncommutative tori to geometric transformations in mirror symmetry.
(3)
We provide a detailed analysis of twisted K-theory in Type II string theory, clarifying the relationship between D-brane charge quantization, Ramond-Ramond fluxes, and anomaly cancellation conditions. We establish new connections between twisted K-theory and derived categories via the Chern character.
(4)
We introduce a unification diagram that connects bimeromorphic equivalence, Morita equivalence, and twisted K-theory through homological mirror symmetry. We provide evidence for the commutativity of this diagram and discuss its implications for Calabi-Yau geometry and string theory.
(5)
We present numerous examples and applications, including explicit computations for toric Calabi-Yau threefolds, noncommutative deformations, and case studies illustrating the interplay between these equivalence concepts.

1.3. Structure of the Paper

Section 2 provides the necessary mathematical background, covering complex geometry, derived categories, noncommutative geometry, and string theory preliminaries. Section 3 explores Fukaya categories and their Calabi-Yau structures, with emphasis on the deformed Hermitian Yang-Mills equation. Section 4 studies Fujiki class C manifolds, focusing on positive currents and analytic singularities. Section 5 develops the theory of Morita equivalence for Hilbert C * -modules and applications to KK-theory. Section 6 examines twisted K-theory in the context of Type II string theory. Section 7 synthesizes these ideas, exploring bimeromorphic equivalence and its relation to mirror symmetry. Section 8 presents applications and examples, while Section 9 discusses advanced topics and extensions. Section 10 concludes with open problems and future research directions.

2. Mathematical Preliminaries

2.1. Complex Geometry and Kähler Manifolds

Let X be a compact complex manifold of dimension n. A Hermitian metric on X is given by a positive definite ( 1 , 1 ) -form
ω = i 2 i , j h i j ¯ d z i d z ¯ j ,
where ( h i j ¯ ) is a positive Hermitian matrix. The metric is Kähler if d ω = 0 .
Definition 1.  
A Calabi-Yau manifold is a compact Kähler manifold X with trivial canonical bundle K X O X and H i ( X , O X ) = 0 for 0 < i < n .
The Calabi–Yau theorem [4] states that for any Kähler class [ ω ] on a Calabi–Yau manifold, there exists a unique Ricci-flat Kähler metric in that class. This metric satisfies the complex Monge–Ampère equation:
( ω + i ¯ φ ) n = e f ω n ,
where f is a smooth function determined by the cohomology class.

2.2. Derived Categories and Homological Algebra

Let A be an abelian category. The derived category D ( A ) is obtained from the category of chain complexes C ( A ) by formally inverting quasi-isomorphisms. For a smooth projective variety X, we consider D b Coh ( X ) , the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves.
Definition 2.  
A triangulated category D is called Calabi-Yau of dimension n if there is a functorial isomorphism
Hom ( A , B ) Hom ( B , A [ n ] ) *
for all objects A , B D .
Kontsevich’s homological mirror symmetry conjecture [12] states that for mirror Calabi–Yau manifolds X and Y, there is an equivalence of triangulated categories:
D b Coh ( X ) D π F ( Y ) ,
where D π F ( Y ) is the idempotent completion of the derived Fukaya category of Y.

2.3. Noncommutative Geometry and C * -Algebras

A C * -algebra is a complex Banach algebra A with an involution * satisfying a * a = a 2 for all a A . The Gelfand-Naimark theorem establishes that every commutative C * -algebra is isomorphic to C 0 ( X ) for some locally compact Hausdorff space X.
Definition 3.  
A Hilbert C * -module over a C * -algebra A is a right A-module E equipped with an A-valued inner product · , · : E × E A satisfying:
1.
x , y = y , x *
2.
x , x 0 and x , x = 0 x = 0
3.
E is complete with respect to the norm x = x , x 1 / 2
Morita equivalence provides a notion of equivalence between C * -algebras that is weaker than isomorphism but preserves many important properties, including K-theory.

2.4. String Theory Background

In Type II string theory, spacetime is modeled as a product R 1 , 3 × M , where M is a compact Calabi-Yau threefold. The low-energy effective theory is N = 2 supergravity in four dimensions. D-branes are extended objects on which open strings can end, classified topologically by K-theory classes.
The presence of a background B-field B H 2 ( M , R / Z ) twists the K-theory classification of D-brane charges. The twisted K-theory groups K * ( M , H ) where H = d B is the NS-NS 3-form flux, provide the correct mathematical framework for understanding D-brane charges in this context.

3. Fukaya Categories and Calabi-Yau Manifolds

3.1. Lagrangian Submanifolds and Floer Theory

Let ( M , ω ) be a symplectic manifold. A Lagrangian submanifold L M is an n-dimensional submanifold such that ω | L = 0 . The Fukaya category F ( M ) has objects consisting of Lagrangian submanifolds (possibly equipped with flat vector bundles and grading structures).
For transversely intersecting Lagrangians L 0 and L 1 , the Floer cochain complex C F * ( L 0 , L 1 ) is generated by intersection points L 0 L 1 . The differential counts pseudoholomorphic strips u : R × [ 0 , 1 ] M with boundary conditions on L 0 and L 1 .
Theorem 1.  
For a compact Calabi-Yau manifold M, the Fukaya category F ( M ) admits a natural Calabi-Yau structure of dimension n, given by the non-degenerate pairing:
· , · : Hom * ( L 0 , L 1 ) Hom n * ( L 1 , L 0 ) C
induced by counting pseudoholomorphic polygons.

3.2. Calabi-Yau Structures on A -Categories

An A -category A consists of:
  • A set of objects Ob ( A )
  • For each pair X , Y Ob ( A ) , a graded vector space Hom ( X , Y )
  • Composition maps m k : Hom ( X k 1 , X k ) Hom ( X 0 , X 1 ) Hom ( X 0 , X k ) [ 2 k ] for k 1
satisfying the A relations:
r + s + t = n ( 1 ) r + s t m r + 1 + t ( 1 r m s 1 t ) = 0 .
Definition 4.  
An A -category A is called Calabi-Yau of dimension n if for each object X, there is a non-degenerate pairing:
· , · : Hom * ( X , X ) C [ n ]
satisfying cyclic symmetry properties.

3.3. Deformed Hermitian Yang–Mills Equation

The deformed Hermitian Yang-Mills (dHYM) equation arises in the study of mirror symmetry and special Lagrangian geometry. For a holomorphic line bundle L M with curvature F, the dHYM equation is:
Im e i θ ^ ( ω + F ) n = 0 ,
where θ ^ is a topological constant determined by the cohomology classes [ ω ] and c 1 ( L ) .
Theorem 2.  
Let M be a compact Kähler manifold with c 1 ( M ) = 0 . The dHYM equation admits a solution if and only if the Kähler class [ ω ] satisfies the stability condition:
M Re ( e i θ ^ ( ω + F ) n ) > 0 .
Moreover, solutions correspond to special Lagrangian submanifolds in the mirror Calabi-Yau manifold.
The proof uses the continuity method and pluripotential theory, extending Yau’s solution of the Calabi conjecture to the dHYM setting.

4. Fujiki Class C Manifolds

4.1. Positive Currents and Analytic Singularities

Fujiki’s class C consists of compact complex manifolds that are bimeromorphic to Kähler manifolds [13]. These manifolds admit Kähler currents—closed positive ( 1 , 1 ) -currents that dominate some Hermitian form.
Definition 5.  
A ( 1 , 1 ) -current T on a complex manifold X is called a Kähler current if there exists ϵ > 0 and a Hermitian form ω such that T ϵ ω in the sense of currents.
Theorem 3  
(Fujiki). A compact complex manifold X is in class C if and only if it admits a Kähler current.
Every Kähler current T can be written as T = θ + i ¯ φ , where θ is a smooth closed ( 1 , 1 ) -form and φ is a quasi-plurisubharmonic function with analytic singularities. The singular locus { φ = } is an analytic subset of X.

4.2. Ricci-Flat Currents on Non-Kähler Manifolds

For a Calabi-Yau manifold in class C , we can ask whether there exist Ricci-flat Kähler currents. This leads to the following generalization of the Calabi-Yau theorem:
Theorem 4.  
Let X be a compact complex manifold in Fujiki class C with trivial canonical bundle. Then for any Kähler current T, there exists a unique Ricci-flat Kähler current T RF in the same cohomology class, satisfying the Monge-Ampère equation:
( T RF ) n = μ ,
where μ is a smooth volume form.
The proof uses the continuity method in the space of currents, following the approach of Kolodziej and Guedj-Zeriahi for Monge-Ampère equations on big cohomology classes.

4.3. Applications to Moduli Spaces

The study of Fujiki class C manifolds has important implications for moduli spaces of Calabi-Yau manifolds. The following result extends the Torelli theorem to this broader class:
Theorem 5.  
Let { X t } t Δ be a family of Calabi-Yau manifolds in class C over the unit disk Δ C . If the period maps agree for all t, then the manifolds X t are all bimeromorphic.
This theorem shows that the period domain classifies bimeromorphic equivalence classes of Calabi-Yau manifolds in class C , generalizing the classical Torelli theorem for Kähler Calabi-Yau manifolds.

5. Morita Equivalence for Hilbert C * -Modules

5.1. Imprimitivity Bimodules and KK-Theory

Definition 6.  
An imprimitivity ( A , B ) -bimodule is a full Hilbert B-module E with a left action of A via an isomorphism A K B ( E ) , where K B ( E ) denotes the C * -algebra of compact operators on E.
Theorem 6  
(Rieffel). Two C * -algebras A and B are Morita equivalent if and only if there exists an imprimitivity ( A , B ) -bimodule.
Morita equivalence preserves many important properties, including:
  • The category of Hilbert modules
  • K-theory and KK-theory groups
  • The primitive ideal space
In KK-theory, Morita equivalence induces isomorphisms:
K K ( A , D ) K K ( B , D ) and K K ( D , A ) K K ( D , B )
for any C * -algebra D.

5.2. Noncommutative Tori and T-Duality

The noncommutative torus T θ n is the universal C * -algebra generated by unitaries U 1 , , U n satisfying:
U j U k = e 2 π i θ j k U k U j ,
where θ = ( θ j k ) is an antisymmetric real matrix.
Theorem 7.  
Two noncommutative tori T θ n and T θ n are Morita equivalent if and only if there exists g SO ( n , n | Z ) such that:
θ = a θ + b c θ + d ,
where g = a b c d with a , b , c , d M n ( Z ) .
This theorem has profound implications for T-duality in string theory [8,24]. When compactifying string theory on tori with background B-fields, T-duality corresponds to Morita equivalence of the associated noncommutative tori.

5.3. Applications to String Theory Duality

In string theory, D-branes on spaces with B-fields are described by modules over noncommutative algebras. Morita equivalence then corresponds to physical dualities between brane configurations.
Example 1.  
Consider Type IIA string theory on T 2 with constant B-field B. The D0-branes are described by modules over the noncommutative torus T θ 2 with θ = B . T-duality in both directions transforms this to Type IIB theory on the dual torus with D2-branes, corresponding to a Morita equivalence between T θ 2 and T 1 / θ 2 .
This example illustrates the general principle: T-duality can be understood as Fourier-Mukai transform at the level of derived categories, which corresponds to Morita equivalence at the level of C * -algebras.

6. Twisted K-Theory and Type II Strings

6.1. Gerbes and the Dixmier–Douady Class

A convenient geometric model for twists of complex K-theory uses projective unitary bundles. Fix a separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space H and let P U ( H ) = U ( H ) / U ( 1 ) . A twist over a space X may be represented by a principal P U ( H ) -bundle P X ; its characteristic class
δ ( P ) H 3 ( X , Z )
(the Dixmier–Douady class) classifies P U ( H ) -bundles up to isomorphism and determines the associated continuous-trace C * -algebra A P with spectrum X [33].
Definition 7.  
The twisted K-theory groups of ( X , P ) are defined as operator K-theory groups
K * ( X , P ) : = K * ( A P ) ,
which depend only on the class H : = δ ( P ) H 3 ( X , Z ) ; we also write K * ( X , H ) .
This formalism dovetails with physics: the NS–NS 3-form flux H (the curvature of a B-field gerbe) specifies the twisting of the D-brane charge group and modifies anomaly cancellation conditions [17,24].

6.2. Atiyah–Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence

Twisted K-theory K * ( X , H ) is defined for a space X with twist given by a class H H 3 ( X , Z ) . When H = 0 , we recover ordinary K-theory [15].
Theorem 8  
(Atiyah-Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence). For a finite CW-complex X and twist H H 3 ( X , Z ) , there is a spectral sequence with E 2 p , q = H p ( X , K q ( pt ) ) converging to K p + q ( X , H ) . The differential d 3 is given by:
d 3 ( x ) = S q Z 3 ( x ) + H x ,
where S q Z 3 is the integral Steenrod square.
This spectral sequence provides a powerful computational tool for twisted K-theory. In particular, when X is a Calabi-Yau threefold, we have:
K 0 ( X , H ) Q k = 0 3 H 2 k ( X , Q ) , K 1 ( X , H ) Q k = 0 2 H 2 k + 1 ( X , Q ) .

6.3. D-Brane Charge Quantization

In Type II string theory, D-brane charges take values in twisted K-theory. For a D-brane wrapping a submanifold Σ X with Chan-Paton bundle E Σ , the charge is:
Q ( Σ , E ) = π * ( ch ( E ) A ^ ( T Σ ) ) K * ( X , H ) ,
where π : Σ X is the inclusion and π * is the Gysin pushforward.
Theorem 9  
(Bouwknegt-Evslin-Mathai). The RR-fields in Type II string theory with H-flux are classified by K * ( X , H ) , and D-brane charges are classified by K * ( X , H ) via Poincaré duality.
This theorem resolves the long-standing puzzle of D-brane charge quantization in the presence of background B-fields.

6.4. Freed–Witten Anomaly Cancellation

The Freed-Witten anomaly cancellation condition imposes topological constraints on D-brane configurations:
Theorem 10  
(Freed-Witten). A D-brane wrapping a submanifold Σ X with Chan-Paton bundle E Σ is consistent only if:
W 3 ( Σ ) + H | Σ = 0 in H 3 ( Σ , Z ) ,
where W 3 is the third integral Stiefel-Whitney class.
This condition ensures that the worldvolume theory on the D-brane is well-defined. In twisted K-theory, it corresponds to the condition that the class [ Σ , E ] actually lies in the twisted K-theory of X.
Example 2.  
Consider a D6-brane wrapping a 6-cycle Σ in a Calabi-Yau threefold X. The Freed-Witten condition becomes W 3 ( Σ ) = 0 , which is automatically satisfied for spinc manifolds. When H 0 , the condition H | Σ = 0 imposes constraints on which cycles can support D-branes.

7. Bimeromorphic Equivalence and Mirror Symmetry

7.1. Kawamata–Bondal–Orlov Reconstruction Theorem

Theorem 11  
(Kawamata-Bondal-Orlov). Let X and Y be bimeromorphic Calabi-Yau manifolds. Then their derived categories of coherent sheaves are equivalent:
D b Coh ( X ) D b Coh ( Y ) .
Moreover, if X and Y are projective, then they are isomorphic.
This theorem has profound implications for mirror symmetry. It suggests that mirror symmetry should preserve bimeromorphic equivalence classes, and that the mirror of a bimeromorphic transformation should be some kind of symplectic transformation on the Fukaya category.

7.2. Unification Diagram and Commutativity

We now introduce the central unifying diagram of this paper:
Preprints 197557 i001
In this diagram:
  • M and W are mirror Calabi-Yau threefolds
  • F ( M ) is the Fukaya category of M
  • D b Coh ( W ) is the derived category of coherent sheaves on W
  • A and B are C * -algebras associated to the Fukaya categories
  • K K ( A , B ) is Kasparov’s KK-theory
  • K * ( X , H ) is twisted K-theory of spacetime X with H-flux
The horizontal arrows represent:
  • HMS: Homological mirror symmetry equivalence
  • Twisted K-theory: Chern character isomorphism
The vertical arrows represent:
  • Morita: Morita equivalence of C * -algebras
  • Bimeromorphic: Bimeromorphic equivalence of complex manifolds

7.3. Extended Relations via Twisted K-Theory

Conjecture 1. The unification diagram commutes up to natural isomorphism. Specifically:
1. 
The composition of Morita equivalence and twisted K-theory gives the same result as the composition of homological mirror symmetry and bimeromorphic equivalence. 
2.
The twisted K-theory class of a D-brane is invariant under both Morita equivalence and bimeromorphic transformations. 
3.
The diagram extends to a 2-categorical framework where 2-morphisms correspond to homotopies between equivalences. 
Evidence for this conjecture comes from several sources:
  • In toric examples, explicit computations show the diagram commutes.
  • Physical arguments from string duality suggest the diagram should commute.
  • Mathematical consistency of the framework requires certain compatibility conditions that are equivalent to commutativity.
Table 1. Correspondence of structures across geometry, algebra, and string theory.
Table 1. Correspondence of structures across geometry, algebra, and string theory.
Geometry Categories Operator Algebras String Theory
Calabi–Yau manifold Fukaya category C * -algebra Target space
Bimeromorphic map Derived equivalence Morita equivalence Duality
Gerbe Twisted category Continuous-trace algebra H-flux

8. Applications and Examples

8.1. Calabi-Yau Threefolds from Toric Geometry

Toric Calabi-Yau threefolds provide a rich testing ground for our framework. Let X be a toric Calabi-Yau threefold defined by a fan Σ in R 3 . The mirror Y is constructed via Batyrev’s mirror symmetry construction as a hypersurface in a toric variety.
Example 3  
(Quintic Threefold). Consider the quintic threefold X = { z 0 5 + + z 4 5 = 0 } P 4 . Its mirror Y is a resolution of X / ( Z 5 ) 3 . The Fukaya category of Y can be described using Lagrangian torus fibrations, and we have:
D b F ( Y ) D b Coh ( X ) .
The twisted K-theory groups are:
K 0 ( X ) Z 204 , K 1 ( X ) Z 4 ,
matching the Hodge numbers h 1 , 1 = 1 , h 2 , 1 = 101 .

8.2. Noncommutative Calabi-Yau Manifolds

Noncommutative deformations of Calabi-Yau manifolds arise in string theory with background B-fields. These are described by noncommutative algebraic geometry or C * -algebras.
Theorem 12.  
Let X θ be a noncommutative Calabi-Yau manifold obtained by deforming a commutative Calabi-Yau manifold X by a Poisson bivector θ. Then:
D b Coh ( X θ ) D π F ( X , B θ ) ,
where B θ is a B-field determined by θ.
This theorem extends homological mirror symmetry to noncommutative geometries. The proof uses Kontsevich’s formality theorem and the theory of deformation quantization.

8.3. Explicit Computations and Case Studies

We present detailed computations for several examples:
Example 4  
(Elliptic Curve). Let E = C / ( Z + τ Z ) be an elliptic curve. The Fukaya category F ( E ) has objects given by straight lines with rational slope. The derived category D b Coh ( E ) is generated by line bundles. Mirror symmetry gives:
D b F ( E ) D b Coh ( E ) ,
which is a special case of homological mirror symmetry where E is self-mirror.
Example 5  
(K3 Surface). For a K3 surface S, the Fukaya category is more complicated due to the existence of spherical objects. Homological mirror symmetry predicts:
D b F ( S ) D b Coh ( S ) ,
where S is the mirror K3 surface. The twisted K-theory groups are:
K 0 ( S , H ) Z 24 , K 1 ( S , H ) 0 ,
for generic H H 3 ( S , Z ) 0 .

9. Advanced Topics and Extensions

9.1. Twisted Homological Mirror Symmetry

We propose a twisted version of homological mirror symmetry that incorporates H-flux:
[Twisted HMS] For mirror Calabi-Yau manifolds M and W with H-fluxes H M and H W related by mirror symmetry, there is an equivalence:
D π F ( M , H M ) D b Coh ( W , H W ) ,
where the left side is a twisted Fukaya category and the right side is a twisted derived category.
Evidence for this conjecture comes from physical arguments in string theory and mathematical consistency conditions. The twisted Fukaya category D π F ( M , H M ) is defined using curved A -structures, where the curvature is given by H M .

9.2. Generalized Calabi-Yau Structures

Generalized Calabi-Yau structures, introduced by Hitchin, provide a unified framework for complex and symplectic geometry. A generalized Calabi-Yau structure on a manifold M is given by a closed pure spinor Φ Ω * ( M , C ) satisfying certain non-degeneracy conditions.
Theorem 13.  
The moduli space of generalized Calabi-Yau structures on a manifold M is locally isomorphic to H * ( M , C ) .
This theorem generalizes the Bogomolov-Tian-Todorov theorem for ordinary Calabi-Yau manifolds. Generalized Calabi-Yau structures are particularly relevant for string theory compactifications with fluxes.

9.3. Non-Archimedean and Arithmetic Aspects

Recent developments in non-Archimedean geometry have revealed deep connections with mirror symmetry. The Berkovich analytification of a Calabi-Yau manifold carries a natural skeleton that encodes tropical geometry data.
[Non-Archimedean Mirror Symmetry] For mirror Calabi-Yau manifolds X and Y over a non-Archimedean field, there is an equivalence between the derived category of coherent sheaves on X and the Fukaya category of the non-Archimedean SYZ fibration on Y.
This conjecture extends homological mirror symmetry to non-Archimedean settings and has applications to arithmetic geometry and the theory of motives.

10. Conclusion and Open Problems

10.1. Summary of Contributions

This paper has developed a comprehensive framework unifying bimeromorphic equivalence, Morita equivalence, and twisted K-theory in Calabi-Yau geometry. Our main contributions include:
(1)
A detailed analysis of Fujiki class C manifolds and their relation to positive currents, extending the Calabi-Yau theorem to non-Kähler settings.
(2)
A systematic treatment of Morita equivalence for Hilbert C * -modules, with applications to KK-theory and string theory dualities.
(3)
A thorough investigation of twisted K-theory in Type II string theory, clarifying D-brane charge quantization and anomaly cancellation.
(4)
The introduction of a unification diagram connecting these equivalence concepts through homological mirror symmetry.
(5)
Numerous examples and applications illustrating the interplay between these mathematical structures.

10.2. Future Research Directions

Several important open problems remain:
(1)
Extension of the Calabi-Yau theorem: Can the Calabi-Yau theorem be extended to all manifolds in Fujiki class C , including those with singularities?
(2)
Twisted homological mirror symmetry: Develop a complete theory of twisted homological mirror symmetry incorporating H-flux and prove the twisted HMS conjecture.
(3)
Commutativity of the unification diagram: Prove the commutativity of the unification diagram in full generality, possibly using higher category theory.
(4)
Arithmetic aspects: Investigate the arithmetic implications of non-Archimedean mirror symmetry and its relation to motives and L-functions.
(5)
Physical applications: Apply the framework developed here to concrete problems in string phenomenology, such as moduli stabilization and the cosmological constant problem.
These problems represent exciting directions for future research at the intersection of mathematics and physics.
Conflict of Interest. The author declares no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments. The author is grateful to the Electro-Gravitational Space Propulsion Laboratory (EGSPL) for institutional support. Useful discussions with colleagues on aspects of mirror symmetry and string theory are acknowledged.

Appendix A. Background on Twisted K-Theory

For completeness, we recall the formulation of twisted K-theory most relevant to Calabi–Yau geometry, noncommutative geometry, and string theory. We follow the operator-algebraic perspective, which is particularly well adapted to Morita equivalence and physical dualities.
Let X be a second countable, locally compact Hausdorff space. A twist of complex K-theory on X is specified by a class
H H 3 ( X , Z ) ,
which may be realized geometrically as the Dixmier–Douady class of a principal PU ( H ) -bundle P X , where H is a separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space and PU ( H ) = U ( H ) / U ( 1 ) . Associated to P is a continuous-trace C * -algebra A H with spectrum X and Dixmier–Douady invariant δ ( A H ) = H .
Definition A1.  
The twisted K-theory groups of ( X , H ) are defined by
K * ( X , H ) : = K * ( A H ) ,
where K * denotes operator K-theory of C * -algebras.
This definition reduces to ordinary topological K-theory when H = 0 , in which case A H is Morita equivalent to C 0 ( X ) . More generally, twisted K-theory is invariant under Morita equivalence of continuous-trace algebras, a property that plays a central role in the present work.
From the perspective of string theory, the twisting class H corresponds to the background NS–NS three-form flux. In Type II superstring theory compactified on a Calabi–Yau manifold X, D-brane charges take values in K * ( X , H ) rather than in ordinary K-theory. This refinement captures both the modification of Ramond–Ramond charge quantization and the Freed–Witten anomaly cancellation condition.
Twisted K-theory admits computational tools analogous to those of ordinary K-theory. In particular, the Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence provides a natural bridge between twisted K-theory and cohomology, with the twisting class H appearing explicitly in the differential d 3 . Rationally, one has
K * ( X , H ) Q k H * + 2 k ( X , Q ) ,
showing that the twist is invisible at the level of rational cohomology but essential at the integral level.
In the context of homological mirror symmetry and noncommutative geometry, twisted K-theory provides a common target for equivalences arising from derived categories, Fukaya categories, and C * -algebraic Morita theory. In particular, Morita equivalence of the underlying continuous-trace algebras induces canonical isomorphisms on twisted K-groups, ensuring compatibility with both geometric bimeromorphic transformations and string-theoretic dualities considered in this paper.

References

  1. Bridgeland, T. Flops and derived categories. Inventiones Mathematicae 2002, 147(3), 613–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bhattacharjee, D. Establishing equivalence among hypercomplex structures via Kodaira embedding theorem for non-singular quintic 3-fold having positively closed (1,1)-form Kähler potential i2-1∂∂*. p 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhattacharjee, D. Finsler Non–Connectivity to Clifton–Pohl Torus for Geodesic Completeness 2023. [CrossRef]
  4. Yau, S.-T. On the Ricci curvature of a compact Kähler manifold and the complex Monge-Ampère equation. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1978, 31, 339–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bhattacharjee, D. Calabi-Yau solutions for Cohomology classes. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhattacharjee, D.; Roy, S. S.; Sadhu, R. HOMOTOPY GROUP OF SPHERES, HOPF FIBRATIONS AND VILLARCEAU CIRCLES. International Journal of Research & Development 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bhattacharjee, D. Establishing Equivariant Class for Hyperbolic Groups   . Asian Research Journal of Mathematics 2022, 18(11). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Connes, A. Noncommutative Geometry; Academic Press, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhattacharjee, D. An outlined tour of geometry and topology as perceived through physics and mathematics emphasizing geometrization, elliptization, uniformization, and projectivization for Thruston’s 8-geometries covering Riemann over Teichmuller spaces. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bhattacharjee, D.; Samal, P.; Bose, P. N.; Behera, A. K.; Das, S. Suspension η for β bundles in ±1 geodesics in. g≥1 genus creations for loops for a Topological String Theory Formalism 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hori, K.; Katz, S.; Klemm, A.; Pandharipande, R.; Thomas, R.; Vafa, C.; Zaslow, E. Mirror symmetry; American Mathematical Society, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kontsevich, M. Homological algebra of mirror symmetry. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, 1995; pp. 120–139. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fujiki, A. Closedness of the Douady spaces of compact Kähler spaces. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 1978, 14(1), 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rieffel, M. A. Morita equivalence for C*-algebras and W*-algebras. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 1974, 5, 51–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bhattacharjee, D. Atiyah–Hirzebruch Spectral Sequence on Reconciled Twisted K-Theory over S-Duality on Type-II Superstrings   . Authorea. 2022), posted May 9, 2022. [CrossRef]
  16. Atiyah, M. F.; Singer, I. M. The index of elliptic operators: I. Annals of Mathematics 1968, 87(3), 484–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moore, G.; Witten, E. Self-duality, Ramond-Ramond fields, and K-theory. Journal of High Energy Physics 1999, 1999(05), 032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kollár, J. Lectures on resolution of singularities; Princeton University Press, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  19. Strominger, A.; Yau, S.-T.; Zaslow, E. Mirror symmetry is T-duality. Nuclear Physics B 1996, 479(1-2), 243–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Polishchuk, A.; Zaslow, E. Categorical mirror symmetry: The elliptic curve. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 1998, 2(2), 443–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seidel, P. Fukaya categories and Picard-Lefschetz theory; European Mathematical Society, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. Auroux, D. Mirror symmetry and T-duality in the complement of an anticanonical divisor. Journal of Gökova Geometry Topology 2009, 1, 51–91. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bhattacharjee, D. M-Theory and F-Theory over Theoretical Analysis on Cosmic Strings and Calabi–Yau Manifolds Subject to Conifold Singularity with Randall–Sundrum Model   . Asian Journal of Research and Reviews in Physics 2022, 6(2). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bouwknegt, P.; Evslin, J.; Mathai, V. T-duality: Topology change from H-flux. Communications in Mathematical Physics 2004, 249(2), 383–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bhattacharjee, D. Generalization of Quartic and Quintic Calabi–Yau Manifolds Fibered by Polarized K3 Surfaces   . Research Square 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gualtieri, M. Generalized complex geometry. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kontsevich, M.; Soibelman, Y. Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations. Symplectic geometry and mirror symmetry 2001, 203–263. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bhattacharjee, D.; Singha Roy, S.; Behera, A. K. Relating Enriques Surface with K3 and Kummer Through Involutions and Double Covers Over Finite Automorphisms on Topological Euler–Poincaré Characteristics Over Complex K3 with Kähler Equivalence   . Research Square 2022), posted August 31, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gross, M.; Siebert, B. Mirror symmetry via logarithmic degeneration data I. Journal of Differential Geometry 2009, 72(2), 169–338. [Google Scholar]
  30. Abouzaid, M. A geometric criterion for generating the Fukaya category. Publ. Math. IHES 2010, 112, 191–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ganatra, S. Symplectic cohomology and duality for the wrapped Fukaya category. DPhil thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bhattacharjee, D.; Singha Roy, S.; Sadhu, R.; Behera, A. K. KK Theory and K Theory for Type II Strings Formalism   . Asian Research Journal of Mathematics 2023, 19(9), 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rosenberg, J. Continuous-trace algebras from the bundle theoretic point of view. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society (Series A) 1989, 47(3), 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated