Submitted:
29 January 2026
Posted:
03 February 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. General Characteristics of the Cockroach Species Used in the Study
2.1.1. Blaptica dubia
2.1.2. Blatta lateralis
2.1.3. Blaberus giganteus
2.2. General Rearing Conditions
2.3. Experimental Design and Feeding Regimes

2.4. Frass Collection and Sample Preparation
2.4.1. Physicochemical Analysis of Frass
2.4.2. Microbiological Analysis of Frass
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion

| Cockroach species | B. dubia | B. lateralis | B. giganteus | Statistically significant |
|||
| Type of feed | Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
|
| Zn (mg/kg) | 52.05±0.07 | 36.41±0.01 | 39.52±0.03 | 40.32±0.25 | 12.70±0.14 | 12.1±0.14 | * |
| Cu (mg/kg) | 20.63±0.04 | 12.05±0.07 | 14.6±0.14 | 13.35±0.07 | 5.54±0.06 | 4.83±0.04 | * |
| Cd (mg/kg) | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0.24±0.01 | 0±0 | n.s. |
| Pb (mg/kg) | 2.73±0.04 | 2.36±0.02 | 3.03±0.03 | 2.95±0.01 | 1.99±0.01 | 0.59±0.01 | * |
| Ni (mg/kg) | 12.8±0.01 | 22.2±0.01 | 21.4±0.01 | 22.10±0.01 | 10.57±0.01 | 10.68±0.01 | * |
| Cr (mg/kg) | 21.05±0.07 | 22.3±0.01 | 31.78±0.04 | 25.73±0.04 | 14.53±0.01 | 16.21±0.01 | * |
| Hg (mg/kg) | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | n.s. |
| As (mg/kg) | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0±0 | 0.17±0.01 | n.s. |
| Mo (mg/kg) | 0.32±0.01 | 0.35±0.01 | 0.19±0.01 | 0.18±0.01 | 0±0 | 0±0 | * |
| Co (mg/kg) | 0.71±0.01 | 0.71±0.01 | 0.98±0.01 | 0.91±0.01 | 0±0 | 0±0 | * |
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Haug, R.T. The Practical Handbook of Compost Engineering, 1st ed.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Epstein, E. Industrial Composting: Environmental Engineering and Facilities Management, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Ganji, A.; Hajrajabi, A.; Babaei, A.; Aayush, K.; Sharma, S.; Shayegan, J. An overview of home composting: configurations and design of bin, process parameters, and benefits. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2025, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz, L.F.; Savage, G.M.; Eggerth, L.L.; Golueke, C.G. Composting and Recycling Municipal Solid Waste, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Brady, N.C.; Weil, R.R. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed; Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Cooperband, L. The Art and Science of Composting: A Resource for Farmers and Compost Producers; University of Wisconsin Extension, Madison: Wisonsin, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Baldwin, K.R.; Greenfield, J.T. Composting on Organic Farms; Center for Environmental Farming Systems: Goldsboro, North Carolina, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Menino, R.; Murta, D. The insects as a workforce for organic fertilizers production–insect frass. In New Generation of Organic Fertilizers; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Edwards, C.A.; Arancon, N. Vermicompost suppresses plant pests and disease attacks. Rednova News 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Edwards, C.A.; Arancon, N.Q.; Sherman, R. (Eds.) Vermiculture Technology: Earthworms, Organic Wastes, and Environmental Management; CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, S.L.; Wu, T.Y.; Lim, P.N.; Shak, K.P. The use of vermicompost in organic farming: overview, effects on soil and economics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 1143–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.; Mahmood, A.; Ahmad, S.; Li, W. Harnessing earthworms for sustainable waste management: insights into vermicomposting. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2025, 236, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barragan Fonseca, K.; Dicke, M.; van Loon, J. Nutritional value of the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) and its suitability as animal feed. J. Insects Food Feed 2017, 3, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitriana, A.R.; Bagastyo, A.Y.; Febrianto, A.; Tay, C.Y.; Warmadewanthi, I.D.A.A. A systematic review of the potential of industrial organic by-products as black soldier fly larvae rearing substrates: nutrient content and environmental impact. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2025, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tognetti, C.; Mazzarino, M.J.; Laos, F. Composting vs. vermicomposting: A comparison of end product quality. Compost Sci. Util. 2007, 15, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Insam, H.; Franke-Whittle, I.; Goberna, M. (Eds.) Microbes at Work: From Wastes to Resources; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Praeg, N.; Klammsteiner, T. Primary study on frass fertilizers from mass-reared insects: Species variation, heat treatment effects, and implications for soil application at laboratory scale. J. Environ. Manage. 2024, 356, 120622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Safitri, R.A. Exploring potential uses of insect frass for agricultural application. J. Insects Food Feed 2024, 11, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smetana, S.; Schmitt, E.; Mathys, A. Sustainable use of Hermetia illucens insect biomass for feed and food: attributional and consequential Life Cycle Assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 146, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- West, J. Getting to the Bottom of Blatticomposting: Using Cockroaches to Create Soil Amendments from Food Scraps and Other Organic Wastes. Community Dev. J. 2010, 45, 251–261. [Google Scholar]
- Patón, D.; García-Gómez, J.C. Blatticomposting of Food Waste, Production Estimates, Chemical Composition and CO2 Emissions Savings: A Case Study. Waste Biomass Valor 2023, 14, 1123–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gowrisankar, R.; Sumithramma, N.; Mulimani, V.; Pradhan, S.K. Blatticomposting: A Sustainable Approach for Organic Waste Management. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change 2023, 13, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, W. Urban Insects and Arachnids: A Handbook of Urban Entomology, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Ardestani, M.M.; Šustr, V.; Hnilička, F.; Frouz, J. Food consumption of the cockroach species Blaptica dubia Serville (Blattodea: Blaberidae) using three leaf litter types in a microcosm design. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 150, 103460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elzinga, R.J. Fundamentals of Entomology, 6th ed.; Pearson: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Bell, W.J.; Roth, L.M.; Nalepa, C.A. Cockroaches: Ecology, Behavior, and Natural History; JHU Press: Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Enebe, M.C.; Erasmus, M. Blatticomposting– a perspective on cockroach-mediated waste valorization to nutrient-rich organic fertilizer for enhancing soil health. Soil Adv. 2024, 2, 100012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salomone, R.; Saija, G.; Mondello, G.; Giannetto, A.; Fasulo, S.; Savastano, D. Environmental impact of food waste bioconversion by insects: Application of Life Cycle Assessment to process using Hermetia illucens. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 890–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oonincx, D.G.A.B.; Finke, M.D. Nutritional value of insects and ways to manipulate their composition. J. Insects Food Feed 2021, 7, 639–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oonincx, D.G.A.B.; van Itterbeeck, J.; Heetkamp, M.J.; van den Brand, H.; van Loon, J.J. An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borah, N.; Hazarika, L.K. Biology and morphometrics of Periplaneta americana. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2019, 7, 1206–1210. [Google Scholar]
- Boate, U.; Suotonye, B. Cockroach (Periplaneta americana): Nutritional value as food and feed for man and livestock. Asian J. Agric. Food Sci. 2020, 15, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adedara, I.A.; Mohammed, K.A.; Da-Silva, O.F.; Salaudeen, F.A.; Gonçalves, F.L.S.; Rosemberg, D.B.; Aschner, M.; Rocha, J.B.T.; Farombi, E.O. Utility of cockroach as a model organism in the assessment of toxicological impacts of environmental pollutants. Environ. Adv. 2022, 10, 100245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.S.; Shelomi, M. Review of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) as Animal Feed and Human Food. Foods 2017, 6, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serville, J.G.A. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Orthoptères; Roret: Paris, France, 1838; p. 776. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, F. Catalogue of the specimens of Blattariae in the collection of the British Museum; British Museum (Natural History): London, UK, 1868; p. 239. [Google Scholar]
- Linnaeus, C. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, 10th ed.; Tomus I; Laurentius Salvius: Holmiae, Sweden, 1758; pp. 1–824. [Google Scholar]
- Kambhampati, S. A phylogeny of cockroaches and related insects based on DNA sequence of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 2017–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, W. Biology of Blaptica dubia (Blattodea: Blaberidae). M.Sc. Thesis, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Mariod, A.; Mirghani, M.; Hussein, I. Blaptica dubia Cockroaches. In Unconventional Oilseeds and Oil Sources; 2017; pp. 337–340. [Google Scholar]
- Gullan, P.J.; Cranston, P.S. The Insects: An Outline of Entomology, 5th ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, T.; Rust, K.M. Life History and Biology of the Invasive Turkestan Cockroach (Dictyoptera: Blattidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Appel, A.G. Insect Growth and Development: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Morphology; Springer: New York, New York, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Shal, C; Gautier, J.Y; Bell, W. J Behavioural Ecology of Cockroaches. Biological reviews 1983, 59(2), 209–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.Y.; Sabree, Z.L.; Moran, N.A. Genome sequence of Blattabacterium sp. strain BGIGA, endosymbiont of the Blaberus giganteus cockroach. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 4450–4451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith-Herron, A.J. Host specificity of five species of Eugregarinida among six species of cockroaches (Insecta: Blattodea). Comp. Parasitol. 2008, 75, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kambhampati, S. A phylogeny of cockroaches and related insects based on DNA sequence of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 2017–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sreng, L. Cockroach mating behaviours, sex-pheromones, and abdominal glands (Dictyoptera, Blaberidae). J. Insect Behav. 1993, 6, 715–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union L300, 14.11.2009, pp. 1–33.
- European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 12048:2001 – Solid fertilisers and soil improvers — Determination of water content — Gravimetric method by drying at (105 ± 2) °C; CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
- European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 13039:2012 – Soil improvers and growing media — Determination of organic matter content and ash; CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 10390:2004 – Soil quality — Determination of pH; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
- European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 16169:2013 – Sludge, treated biowaste and soil — Determination of Kjeldahl nitrogen; CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN ISO 54321:2021; Soil, treated biowaste, sludge and waste — Fractionation of elements soluble in aqua regia. ISO/CEN: Geneva/Brussels, 2021.
- European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 12880:2005 – Sludge characterisation — Determination of dry residue and water content; CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
- Ashworth, A.J.; Amorim, H.C.S.; Drescher, G.L.; Moore, P.A., Jr.; Rojas, M.G.; Morales-Ramos, J.; Donoghue, A.M. Insect frass effects on soil properties and forage systems. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 87075. [Google Scholar]
- Lomonaco, G.; Franco, A.; De Smet, J.; Scieuzo, C.; Salvia, R.; Falabella, P. Larval frass of Hermetia illucens as organic fertilizer. Insects 2024, 15, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lavelle, P.; Spain, A.V. Soil Ecology; Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York, New York, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Hillel, D. Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics; Academic Press: New York, New York, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Othman, N.; Irwan, J.M.; Roslan, M. Vermicomposting of Food Waste. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 2012, 4, 39–48. [Google Scholar]
- Jadia, C.D.; Fulekar, M.H. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals: Recent Techniques. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 921–928. [Google Scholar]
- Lopes, I.G.; Brandon, M.G.; Praeg, N.; Claeys, J.; Yakti, W.; Bitterlich, M.; Jones, J.J.; Geilfus, C.M.; Klammsteiner, T. Critical considerations for evaluating insect frass composition and soil interactions. J. Insects Food Feed 2025, pp 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Singhal, N.; Kumar, M.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: an emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wada-Katsumata, A.; Zurek, L.; Nalyanya, G.; Roelofs, W.L.; Zhang, A.; Schal, C. Gut bacteria mediate aggregation in the German cockroach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15678–15683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ademolu, K.O.; Mustapha, O.Y.; Idowu, A.B. Nutritional and gut microbial analyses of adult male cockroaches (Periplaneta americana, Dictyoptera, Blattodea) from three locations in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Entomol. Romanica 2020, 24, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Elhag, O.; Cai, M.; Zheng, L.; Huang, F.; Jordan, H.R.; Tomberlin, J.K.; Sze, S.H.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, J. Hermetia illucens L. larvae-associated intestinal microbes reduce the transmission risk of zoonotic pathogens in pig manure. Microb. Biotechnol. 2022, 15, 2631–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| PCA No. | Type x Parameter | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | B. dubia | 0 |
| 2 | B. dubia | 1 |
| 3 | B. lateralis | 0 |
| 4 | B. lateralis | 1 |
| 5 | B. giganteus | 0 |
| 6 | B. giganteus | 1 |
| Cockroach species | B. dubia | B. lateralis | B. giganteus | Statistically significant |
|||
| Type of feed | Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
|
| MC (%) | 73.51±0.01 | 61.33±0.04 | 50.35±0.01 | 52.01±0.01 | 9.66±0.15 | 14.48±0.04 | * |
| Dry matter (%) | 26.52±0.06 | 38.65±0.01 | 49.47±0.24 | 47.89±0.13 | 90.21±0.04 | 85.4±0.14 | * |
| pH | 5.04±0.05 | 6.91±0.01 | 7.84±0.05 | 7.35±0.01 | 6.98±0.01 | 7.04±0.01 | * |
| E.C. mS/cm | 2.07±0.01 | 2.97±0.02 | 3.53±0.01 | 3.87±0.01 | 0.27±0.03 | 0.24±0.01 | * |
| Ash (%) | 13.93±0.06 | 34.69±0.06 | 22.36±0.08 | 16.39±0.05 | 23.9±0.14 | 21.1±0.14 | * |
| LOI (%) | 86.06±0.04 | 65.31±0.06 | 77.62±0.04 | 83.63±0.07 | 76.05±0.07 | 78.75±0.07 | * |
| Cockroach species | B. dubia | B. lateralis | B. giganteus | Statistically significant |
|||
| Type of feed | Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
Control group |
Slaughterhouse waste |
|
| C (organic) (dm) (%) | 48.24±0.08 | 36.57±0.02 | 43.46±0.01 | 46.55±0.35 | 42.55±0.07 | 44.05±0.07 | * |
| Organic matter (dm) (%) | 86.02±0.02 | 65.14±0.19 | 77.55±0.06 | 83.69±0.16 | 75.95±0.07 | 78.7±0.14 | * |
| N (total-original sample) (%) | 0.38±0.01 | 0.53±0.01 | 0.87±0.01 | 0.70±0.01 | 0.86±0.01 | 0.78±0.01 | * |
| N (total) (dm) (%) | 1.44±0.01 | 1.38±0.04 | 1.71±0.01 | 1.46±0.01 | 0.96±0.01 | 0.91±0.01 | * |
| P2O5 (total) (dm) (%) | 0.30±0.01 | 0.28±0.02 | 0.36±0.01 | 0.31±0.01 | 0.24±0.01 | 0.22±0.01 | * |
| K2O (total) (dm) (%) | 2.06±0.06 | 2.21±0.01 | 2.56±0.01 | 2.29±0.01 | 1.98±0.01 | 2.03±0.02 | * |
| Ca (total) (dm) (%) | 0.77±0.01 | 0.65±0.01 | 0.78±0.01 | 0.67±0.02 | 0.40±0.01 | 0.59±0.01 | * |
| Mg (total) (dm) (%) | 0.15±0.01 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.21±0.01 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | * |
| Mn (total) (dm) (%) | 1.21±0.01 | 5.53±0.04 | 1.51±0.01 | 2.06±0.01 | 1.43±0.01 | 1.83±0.01 | * |
| Fe (total) (dm) (g/kg) | 56.73±0.04 | 74.43±0.04 | 63.41±0.01 | 57.05±0.07 | 42.84±0.05 | 40.63±0.04 | * |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).