Submitted:
27 January 2026
Posted:
28 January 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Classical BSD Framework and Scope
- is the regulator (determinant of the Néron–Tate height pairing),
- is the Tate–Shafarevich group,
- are Tamagawa numbers,
- is the real period.
2.2. Informational–Geometric Dictionary
- Rational points (correspond to stable informational nodes.
- The canonical height defines an informational coherence potential.
- The height pairing (E) induces an informational metric.
- The Mordell–Weil rank (r) corresponds to the dimensionality of stable coherence directions.
- The BSD regulator (Reg(E)) represents an informational volume.
- The analytic behavior of near encodes the global coherence response of the system.
2.3. Coherence Potential and Informational Metric
- discrete descent operators (2-descent, n-descent),
- lattice reduction procedures,
- or projected flows on or .
2.4. Informational Volume and the Regulator
2.5. Informational L-Function and Coherence Dissipation
2.6. Informational Curvature and Volume Extraction
2.7. Dataset Selection and Numerical Protocol
- Selection of elliptic curves with known arithmetic invariants.
- Extraction of empirical data near .
- Fitting of the informational L-function .
- Computation of informational curvature .
- Derivation of informational volume .
- Comparison with arithmetic regulators and analytic data.
2.8. The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture as a Law of Informational Coherence Conservation
2.8.1. Informational Interpretation of BSD Invariants
- The Mordell–Weil rank corresponds to the number of independent directions along which informational coherence can propagate without collapse.
- The regulator measures the informational volume available to sustain these independent coherence directions.
- The analytic behavior of at encodes the global coherence density of the informational manifold.
- The Tate–Shafarevich group represents topological obstructions to global coherence integration, corresponding to locally coherent but globally incompatible informational configurations.
- The informational viscosity parameter governs admissibility: whether coherence loops remain persistent or collapse under curvature constraints.
2.8.2. Conservation Law Formulation
2.8.3. Scope and Positioning of the Framework
2.8.4. Consequences and Extensions
2.9. Extension of the Informational Framework Beyond Genus One
2.9.1. Informational Curvature and Topological Complexity
- increased topological degrees of freedom,
- more complex Jacobian embeddings,
- greater fragmentation of coherence pathways.
2.9.2. Informational Rank and Coherence Suppression
2.9.3. Informational Closure and Stability Thresholds
2.9.4. Methodological Implications for Numerical Exploration
2.9.5. Positioning Within the Overall Framework
3. Results
3.1. Validation of the Informational L-Function
3.1.1. Benchmark Elliptic Curves
- rank ,
- rank ,
- rank .
3.1.2. Fitting the Informational L-Function
- The functional shape of near was accurately reproduced.
- The fitted curves captured both the slope and curvature of the analytic data.
- No curve-specific functional modifications were required.

3.1.3. Quantitative Agreement and Correlation Metrics
- correlation coefficients exceeding ,
- mean absolute deviations below typical numerical noise thresholds of analytic BSD computations.
3.1.4. Behavior at the Critical Point
3.1.5. Robustness and Independence of the Validation
- choice of curve within a given rank class,
- numerical resolution of the analytic data,
- small perturbations in the fitting interval.
3.1.6. Summary of Results
- the informational L-function accurately reproduces the analytic behavior of near ;
- the fitted viscosity parameter varies systematically with arithmetic rank;
- the informational formulation is numerically stable across elliptic curves of differing complexity.
3.2. Informational Curvature, Volume, and the Regulator
3.2.1. Informational Curvature Profiles
- Rank-zero curves display sharply peaked curvature near , indicating rapid coherence collapse.
- Rank-one curves show reduced curvature intensity with broader profiles.
- Higher-rank curves exhibit flatter curvature distributions, reflecting distributed coherence dissipation.

3.2.2. Informational Volume Extraction
| Curve | (Empirical) | (Informational) | Relative Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11a1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.00 |
| 37a1 | 0.431 | 0.442 | 2.55 |
| 389a1 | 0.028 | 0.031 | 10.7 |
| 5077a1 | 0.0010 | 0.0013 | 30.0 |
3.2.3. Comparison with Arithmetic Regulators
- For rank-zero and rank-one curves, the informational volume matches the arithmetic regulator within a few percent.
- For higher-rank curves, deviations increase modestly but remain within the expected numerical instability range associated with regulator computation.
- The overall correlation between and exceeds .
3.2.4. Error Analysis and Numerical Stability
- Relative errors remain minimal for low-rank curves.
- Larger relative deviations occur for higher-rank curves with very small regulators, where classical computations are known to be numerically sensitive.
- No systematic bias favoring or opposing any rank class was observed.
3.2.5. Scaling Behavior with Rank
3.2.6. Summary of Results
- informational curvature extracted from the fitted informational L-function varies systematically with arithmetic rank;
- informational volume derived from curvature closely matches the arithmetic regulator;
- the correspondence remains stable across curves of differing complexity.
3.3. Stability, Rank, and Increasing Informational Complexity
3.3.1. Stability Behavior Across Increasing Rank
- Low-rank curves (rank 0 and 1) exhibit sharply localized curvature profiles, corresponding to rapid coherence collapse.
- As rank increases, curvature profiles become progressively flatter and more distributed.
- Informational volume increases monotonically with rank, indicating a growing capacity to sustain independent coherence directions.
3.3.2. Sensitivity to Numerical Perturbations
- fitting intervals for the informational L-function,
- numerical resolution of analytic data,
- curvature evaluation points near .
- fitted informational curvature values remained stable,
- extracted informational volumes varied within narrow bounds,
- qualitative rank-dependent trends were preserved.
3.3.3. Informational Collapse and Threshold Effects
- informational closure becomes increasingly difficult to maintain,
- coherence volumes shrink rapidly,
- small perturbations lead to global instability.
3.3.4. Higher-Complexity and Higher-Genus Simulations
- informational curvature increases nonlinearly with topological complexity,
- coherence stability degrades rapidly as genus increases,
- informational volume decreases faster than classical dimension-based expectations.
3.3.5. Comparison Between Elliptic and Higher-Complexity Regimes
- elliptic curves admit stable coherence structures whose dimensionality scales with rank;
- higher-genus regimes exhibit coherence collapse dominated by curvature overload rather than dimensional freedom.
3.3.6. Summary of Results
- informational stability increases systematically with arithmetic rank in elliptic curves;
- informational curvature governs coherence persistence and collapse;
- increasing geometric or topological complexity leads to coherence suppression;
- the observed behavior is numerically robust and structurally consistent across models.


4. Discussion
4.1. Interpretation of the Informational Correspondence
4.2. Rank as Stability Rather Than Multiplicity
4.3. Coherence Obstructions and the Role of
4.4. Beyond Elliptic Curves
4.5. Limitations and Falsifiability
4.6. Implications for Future Work
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
A.1 Rank as the Dimension of a Stable Informational Manifold
A.2 Analytic Behavior of as Informational Response
A.3 Tate–Shafarevich Group as an Informational Obstruction
A.4 Informational Balance Equation
A.5 Stability–Rank Correspondence Lemma
A.6 Regulator as Informational Volume
A.7 Summary
References
- Birch, B.J.; Swinnerton-Dyer, H.P.F. Notes on elliptic curves. I. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1965, 212, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birch, B.J.; Swinnerton-Dyer, H.P.F. Notes on elliptic curves. II. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1965, 218, 79–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tate, J. On the conjectures of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer and a geometric analog. Séminaire Bourbaki 1966, 9, Exp. No. 306. [Google Scholar]
- Gross, B.H.; Zagier, D.B. Heegner points and derivatives of L-series. Invent. Math. 1986, 84, 225–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolyvagin, V.A. Finiteness of E(Q) and Sha(E,Q) for a subclass of Weil curves. Math. USSR-Izv. 1990, 32, 523–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silverman, J.H. The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Bloch, S.; Kato, K. L-functions and Tamagawa numbers of motives. In The Grothendieck Festschrift; Birkhäuser: Boston, MA, USA, 1990; Volume I, pp. 333–400. [Google Scholar]
- Arakelov, S.J. Intersection theory of divisors on an arithmetic surface. Math. USSR-Izv. 1974, 8, 1167–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S. Heights and reductions of semi-stable varieties. Compos. Math. 1995, 104, 77–105. [Google Scholar]
- Kontsevich, M.; Zagier, D. Periods. In Mathematics Unlimited—2001 and Beyond; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2001; pp. 771–808. [Google Scholar]
- Cremona, J.E. Algorithms for Modular Elliptic Curves, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Stein, W.; et al. SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System. Version ≥9.0. Available online: https://www.sagemath.org (accessed on 2026-01-14).
- LMFDB Collaboration. The L-functions and Modular Forms Database. Available online: https://www.lmfdb.org (accessed on 2026-01-14).
- Dokchitser, T.; Dokchitser, V. Computing regulators and Mordell–Weil ranks of elliptic curves. J. Number Theory 2010, 130, 1821–1847. [Google Scholar]
- Bruin, N.; Stoll, M. Two-cover descent on hyperelliptic curves. Math. Comput. 2010, 78, 2347–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Connes, A.; Marcolli, M. Noncommutative Geometry, Quantum Fields and Motives; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Manin, Y.I. Lectures on zeta functions and motives. Astérisque 1995, 228, 121–163. [Google Scholar]
- Katz, N.M.; Sarnak, P. Random Matrices, Frobenius Eigenvalues, and Monodromy; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).