Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Joint Control Ability of Labidura riparia (Pallas) and Sycanus croceovittatus (Dohrn) Against Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée)

Submitted:

10 December 2025

Posted:

26 December 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

In order to clarify the control ability of Labidura riparia and Sycanus croceovittatus on Ostrinia furnacalis larvae, the predation ability and preference of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis were studied in this study. The results showed that the predation ability of the two species to the 3rd instar larvae of O.furnacalis conformed to the Holling II functional response. The combination of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus had the best predation effect on the 3rd instar larvae of O.furnacalis, which was significantly higher than that of L. riparia or S. croceovittatus alone. The L. riparia showed a positive preference for the 1-3 instar larvae and a negative preference for the 4-5 instar larvae. The S. croceovittatus showed a positive preference for the 3-5 instar larvae and a negative preference for the 1-2 instar larvae. In summary, compared with the use of a natural enemy insect alone, the combined use of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus has a more significant effect on the prevention and control of O.furnacalis larvae, and can be used for biological control of O.furnacalis.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenee) belongs to the genus Ostrinia of the Lepidoptera family. It is widely distributed in China and is an absolutely dominant species. It can damage 69 crops such as corn, sorghum, and cotton. It has strong ecological adaptability and is characterized by overlapping generations, polysexual diapause, omnivorous, and boring. It is an important agricultural pest in China[1,2,3]. Its larvae can drill and damage the stems, tassels and ears of corn, resulting in broken stems and ears. It will not only interfere with the quality of pollen, but also induce corn ear rot, resulting in serious loss of yield and quality, which seriously threatens the safe production of corn in China and hinders the sustainable development of China ‘s planting industry[4,5]. Because the O. furnacalis has the habit of boring, it is more difficult to control. The control effect of single application is not obvious, and multiple applications often lead to pest resistance[6,7,8]. With the commercial planting of transgenic maize in China, the resistance of O. furnacalis, as a target pest, is imminent. It is of great significance to explore effective biological control methods to control the harm of O. furnacalis, to ensure the safety of corn production, to reduce the use of chemical pesticides and to protect the ecological environment. The field investigation found that the L. riparia and the S. croceovittatus have certain predation ability in nature, but their specific control effect on the O. furnacalis and the ability to control the damage when the two are combined need to be further studied.
Labidura riparia (Pallas) belongs to Dermaptera, Labiduridae. In the corn fields of the Huang-Huai-Hai region, L. riparia is widely distributed. It has the characteristics of strong environmental adaptability, long life, many species of predatory pests, and wide range of insect states. It has great potential for application[9,10,11]. In recent years, studies have shown that L. riparia has strong predation ability to fall armyworm and garlic root maggot[11,12]. At present, the ecological research and application of L. riparia have attracted more and more attention.
Sycanus croceovittatus (Dohrn), belonging to Hemiptera Reduviidae, is an important predatory natural enemy in agriculture and forestry[13]. The S. croceovittatus is an incomplete metamorphosis insect, with three stages of egg, nymph and adult. The nymph is divided into five instars. Its distribution area in China includes Guangxi, Fujian, Yunnan, Guizhou and other places, and it is distributed in Southeast Asian countries such as India and Myanmar[14]. S.luteus preys on the larvae of various lepidopteran pests, such as Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E.Smith)[15], Spodoptera litura (Fabricius)[16], Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) [13], etc., and also has predation ability on locusts, sawfly, armyworm and aphids[17].
As the dominant natural enemy insects of our team, L. riparia and S. croceovittatus have certain predation ability in nature, but their combined control effect on O.furnacalis larvae has not been reported. In order to explore the predation ability of the combination of the two natural enemy insects on the larvae of O.furnacalis, the predation functional response of the mixture of the two natural enemy insects on the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis was carried out in this study. The predation ability and predation preference of different instar larvae of O.furnacalis provide a scientific basis for the three-dimensional biological control of the two natural enemy insects in the field in the future.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Insects and Instruments

L. riparia was trapped in the corn field of Henan Modern Agricultural Development and Research Base (113.71°N, 35.01°E)[18]. The adults of S. croceovittatus were collected from the fifth generation of the laboratory and subcultured populations in the corn field of Shuicheng Village, Baozang Town, Jiangcheng County, Yunnan Province(101.65°N,22.68°E). Larvae of the O. furnacalis, O. furnacalis, were collected from a corn fieldin Yuanyang County, Henan Province (113.70 ° N, 35.01 ° E),The 40 th generation of the larvae was reared indoors. The above natural enemy insects and prey insects are raised in an artificial climate box with a temperature of 26 ± 1 °C, a relative humidity of 70 ± 5%, and a photoperiod of 14L : 10D (Model : LC-QHX-70T, Shanghai Lichen Bangxi Instrument Technology Co., Ltd. China).

2.2. Observation on the Predation Behavior of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on the 3rd Instar Larvae of O.furnacalis

After one L. riparia or S. croceovittatus was starved for 24 h, it was placed in a petri dish with a diameter of 9 cm. Five third-instar larvae of O. furnacalis were placed in the petri dish to observe and photograph the predation behavior of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus.
During the experiment, the whole process of finding prey, approaching prey, attacking prey and finally successful predation of two natural enemy insects was recorded in detail, and the time required for each predation was recorded. In order to ensure the accuracy of the observation results, each treatment was repeated 10 times, and new culture dishes and O. furnacalis larvae were replaced in each experiment to avoid environmental or prey factors affecting the experimental results. In the process of observation, we also paid special attention to the differences in predation behavior between the stream bank L. riparia and the S. croceovittatus bug, so as to make a comparative analysis in the future.

2.3. Predatory Functional Response of L. riparia and Yellow-Belted Rhinoceros to the 3rd Instar Larvae of O.furnacalis

An earwig was starved for 24 h, and then transferred into a culture dish with a diameter of 9 cm. In each culture dish, 5,10,15,20,25,30,35 third-instar larvae of O. furnacalis were placed in each dish, and an appropriate amount of O. furnacalis artificial feed was placed in each dish for O. furnacalis larvae to feed (Figure 1). After 24 h, the remaining amount of insects in the culture dish was recorded;
After starvation for 24 h, a S. croceovittatus was moved into a culture dish with a diameter of 9 cm, and 5,10,15,20,25,30,35 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis were placed in each culture dish. At the same time, an appropriate amount of O. furnacalis artificial feed was placed in each dish for O. furnacalis larvae to feed (Figure 2). After 24 h, the remaining amount of insects in the culture dish was recorded, and each treatment was repeated 10 times. The Holling II functional response formula is as follows [19]:
N a = a T N 1 + a T h N
In the formula, “N” is the density of prey;
“Na”is the number of prey prey;
“T”is the time of prey exposure to predator (T = 1d);
“a” is the instantaneous attack rate;
“Th”is the time to process one prey.

2.4. The Predation Ability of the Combination of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on the 3rd Instar Larvae of O.furnacalis

The L. riparia and S. croceovittatus were starved for 24 h, and then they were moved into a plastic insect box with a diameter of 12 cm and a height of 10 cm, and different numbers of 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis were placed in each insect box.
The experimental treatments were as follows : CK (no L. riparia and no S. croceovittatus as a control), T1(2 L. riparia), T2 (1 S. croceovittatus and 1 L. riparia), T3(2 S. croceovittatus). The control was used to observe the natural mortality rate under the condition of no natural enemy insects. Each treatment group was set up with 6 density gradients of 20,30,40,50,60 and 70 (Figure 3). The number of remaining O. furnacalis in each culture dish was recorded at 3h, 6h, 12h, and 24h after the O. furnacalis larvae were placed as prey, and the predation of natural enemies against O. furnacalis in each treatment group was calculated for 24h.Predation, each treatment was repeated five times.

2.5. Predatory Preference of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on Stream Bank

Ten 1st-5th instar larvae of O.furnacalis were placed in each petri dish, and then one L. riparia and one S. croceovittatus were starved for 24 hours and transferred into the above-mentioned insect boxes respectively. After 24 hours, the number of 1st-5th instar larvae of O.furnacalis in each treatment was recorded, and the predation preference of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to different instar larvae of O.furnacalis was calculated, each treatment was repeated five times.The formula is as follows [20]:
P r e f e r e n c e   i n d e x ( C i ) = Q i F i Q i + F i
In the formula : Qi is the ratio of the predator to the prey of the i species; Fi is the proportion of the ith prey in the environment; when the predator has a positive preference for the first prey, 0<Ci<1; when the predator has a negative preference for the ith prey, -1<Ci<0.

2.6. Data Processing

IBM SPSS Statistics 26 statistical analysis software was used to analyze the significant differences between the treatments (P<0.05). The drawing was completed using Microsoft Office Excel 2016 software.

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Predatory Behavior of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on the 3rd Instar Larvae of O.furnacalis

Both the L. riparia and the S. croceovittatus can prey on the 3rd instar larvae of O.furnacalis. The earwig will use the chewing mouthparts to bite the O.furnacalis larvae (Figure 3a), and the S. croceovittatus will insert the mouthpin into the O.furnacalis larvae to suck all its body fluids (Figure 3b).

3.2. Predatory Functional Response of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to the 3rd Instar Larvae of O.furnacalis

The predation of the 3rd instar larvae of the O. furnacalis increased with the increase of prey density. When the prey density reached a certain limit, the predation of the 3rd instar larvae of the O. furnacalis did not increase with the increase of prey density, but tended to be stable (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
The maximum daily predation amount of L. riparia on the 3 rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis was 43.5, the instantaneous attack rate was 1.181, the disposal time of one 3 rd instar larvae was 0.023 d, and the predation efficiency was 51.3. The maximum daily predation amount of S. croceovittatus on the 3 rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis was 108.7, the instantaneous attack rate was 1.025, the disposal time of the third instar larvae of the O. furnacalis was 0.009 d, and the predation efficiency was 113.9 (Table 1).

3.3. The Amount of O. furnacalis Predation by L. riparia and S. croceovittatus in Combination

The predation of O. furnacalis by different treatments was shown in Figure 6.When there were 20 (Figure 6a) and 30 (Figure 6b) 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis per dish, there was no significant difference in the predation of O. furnacalis among the three treatments in all observation periods. At 40 O. furnacalis larvae per dish (Figure 6c), after 24 h of predation, the predation amount of O. furnacalis in the treatment group of one L. riparia and one S. croceovittatus was significantly higher than that in the treatment group of two L. riparia, and there was no significant difference between the treatment group and the treatment group of two S. croceovittatus. When there were 50 (Figure 6d) and 60 (Figure 6e) O. furnacalis larvae per dish, the predation amount of O. furnacalis in the treatment group of one brookside L. riparia and one S. croceovittatus was significantly higher than that in the treatment group of two brookside L. riparia after 6h, 12h and 24h predation. The predation amount of O. furnacalis in the treatment group of one brookside L. riparia and one S. croceovittatus was also significantly higher than that in the treatment group of two S. croceovittatus after 12h and 24h predation. When there were 70 O. furnacalis larvae per dish (Figure 6f), the predation amount of O. furnacalis in the treatment group of one brookshore L. riparia and one S. croceovittatus was significantly higher than that in the treatment group of two brookshore earwigs after 6h, 12h and 24h predation, and the predation amount of O. furnacalis in the treatment group of one brookshore L. riparia and one S. croceovittatus was also significantly higher than that in the treatment group of two bugs after 24h predation.

3.4. Feeding Preference of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to Different Instars of O. furnacalis

The predation amount and preference index of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on different instars of O.furnacalis are shown in Table 2.There was no significant difference in the predation amount of L. riparia on the 1st-3rd instar larvae of O.furnacalis, but they were significantly higher than those on the 4th-5th instar larvae of O.furnacalis.Among them, the predation amount of L. riparia on the 1st instar larvae was the largest, reaching 6.4 heads. L. riparia showed positive preference for the 1st-3rd instar larvae of O.furnacalis (0<Ci<1), but showed negative preference for the 1st-2nd instar larvae of O.furnacalis (-1<Ci<0). S. croceovittatus was no significant difference in the predation of 4-5 instar larvae of O.furnacalis, but they were significantly higher than that of 1-3 instar larvae. At the same time, the predation of 3 instar larvae of O.furnacalis was significantly higher than that of 1-2 instar larvae of O.furnacalis. The 4th instar larvae of O.furnacalis were preyed by O.furnacalis, with the largest number of 9.4, showing positive preference for 3-5 instar larvae of O.furnacalis (0<Ci<1), while showing negative preference for 1-2 instar larvae of O.furnacalis (-1<Ci<0).

4. Conclusions and Discussion

In this study, it was found that the L. riparia and the S. croceovittatus had strong predation ability on the 3rd instar larvae of O.furnacalis, and the predation amount increased first and then gradually stabilized with the increase of the density of O.furnacalis larvae, which was consistent with the holling type II predation functional response. The predation of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on S.frugiperda larvae was consistent[11,21]. With the increase of the number of prey, L. riparia and prey could prey more prey. After reaching the maximum predation amount, it no longer increased with the increase of prey density.
The three-dimensional control of pests is a comprehensive management strategy. Its core is to change the past mode of relying solely on chemical pesticides and to build a multi-level, multi-dimensional and environmentally friendly sustainable prevention and control system. Among them, the scientific utilization of natural enemy resources is the key link to realize this strategy[22]. By introducing, protecting and supporting natural enemy populations, they can establish communities at multiple spatial levels such as underground, surface, canopy and even air of crops, forming a three-dimensional and dynamic biological defense network, which has significant economic, ecological and social benefits[23]. This study found that in the first 6 hours of the experiment, there was no significant difference in the predation of the 3rd instar larvae of the O. furnacalis under the conditions of single brookshore L. riparia, brookshore L. riparia mixed with S. croceovittatus. With the prolongation of predation time, the predation of O. furnacalis by the mixed treatment of brookshore L. riparia and S. croceovittatus was significantly higher than that of single brookshore L. riparia and S. croceovittatus, and the gap was widening. The main reason is that with the increase of time, the O. furnacalis larvae in the insect box are scattered and dispersed, and are relatively evenly distributed in the upper and lower parts of the box. However, the L. riparia is just the opposite to that of the S. croceovittatus. The L. riparia likes to live on the ground, but the S. croceovittatus has the habit of moving upwards. The two have obvious levels in space. The corresponding phenomenon is also observed during the experiment. The L. riparia always moves at the bottom of the insect box, while the S. croceovittatus mostly moves on the upper part of the insect box. This also reflects the survival state of the two natural enemies in the field to a certain extent, which can reasonably allocate prey and maximize the predation of O. furnacalis. It can realize the three-dimensional prevention and control of O. furnacalis, while the L. riparia or S. croceovittatus alone will miss the prey in the infrequently active area and reduce the predation efficiency of O. furnacalis. Relevant studies have found that the joint release of Dastarcus helophoroides and Scleroderma guani can strengthen the prevention and control effect on P.eryngii [24]; the combination of C.sinica adults and H.axyridis adults had better control effect on aphids than using C.sinica adults alone[25]. Under high density prey conditions, H.axyridis and P.japonica showed a certain synergistic effect[26], which is consistent with our research results.
The selectivity of predators to prey is often determined by nature and a more favorable direction for themselves[27]. This study found that the stream bank L. riparia prefers to prey on the 1-3 instars of relatively small O. furnacalis larvae. On the one hand, due to the limitation of its own body size, it is easier to kill the prey that is very different from its own body size. At the same time, small prey is more convenient for its chewing mouth to eat. On the other hand, S. croceovittatus prefers to prey on the 3-5 instar O. furnacalis larvae with larger body size. On the one hand, it meets the sufficient intake of its food. On the other hand, S. croceovittatus has a long piercing mouthpiece, which needs to be inserted into the prey like a needle when preying on the prey. This requires that the prey has enough body size to provide its sucking juice. Obviously, it is difficult for young O. furnacalis larvae with too small body size to meet these conditions.
This difference in predation preference makes the L. riparia and the S. croceovittatus complementary in the prevention and control of O. furnacalis. When the two are used in combination, it can cover all instars of O. furnacalis, from young to old, to achieve a full range of prevention and control. This three-dimensional prevention and control strategy not only improves the predation efficiency, but also reduces the prevention and control loopholes caused by the omission of prey in infrequently active areas. In addition, the results of this study also provide a useful reference for the biological control of other pests, that is, more efficient and comprehensive pest control can be achieved by rationally utilizing the predation characteristics of different natural enemies.
In this study, it was shown in the laboratory that the L. riparia and the S. croceovittatus can complete the predation of the O. furnacalis larvae to the greatest extent in the upper and lower space, and can also complement each other in the predation preference of the O. furnacalis larvae at different ages. The mixture of the two natural enemies can improve the control effect on the O. furnacalis. However, due to the complexity of the real field conditions, the optimal control time and control effect of the two natural enemies against the O. furnacalis can be further explored in the real field conditions.

References

  1. Ruan, H.Y.; Meng, J.Y.; Yang, C.L.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, C.Y. Identification of Six Small Heat Shock Protein Genes in Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Analysis of Their Expression Patterns in Response to Environmental Stressors.Journal Of Insect Science.2022,22(06).
  2. Bi, H.L.; Merchant, A.; Gu, J.W.; Li, X.W.;Zhou, X.G.; Zhang, Q. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of Abdominal-A and Ultrabithorax in the Asian O. furnacalis, Ostrinia furnacalis . Insects. 2022, 13(4).
  3. Li, Y.Y.; Li, M.M.; Yang, Q.; Chen, L.H.; Li, B.L.; Fang, A.S.; He, K.H.; Dong, J.G.; Zhao, Y.W.; Yu, Z.H.; Hao, Y.C.; Wu, J.X. Effects of Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée) on maize yield and treatment threshold. Plant Protection. 2022,48(01):82-89. (In Chinese).
  4. Wang, Y.; Wang, K.Q.; Wang, X.X.; Liu, X.L.; Wang, C. Trapping effects of different sex pheromone lures on Ostrinia furnacalis males in Harbin. Plant Protection. 2023,49(06):338-342+349. (In Chinese).
  5. Wei, X.; Chen, R.Z. Effects of host plants on the development and protective enzyme activity of Ostrinia furnacalis. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology. 2020,57(02):355-362. (In Chinese).
  6. Crespo, A.L.B.; Spencer, T.A.; Alves, A.P.; Hellmich, R.L; Blankenship, E.E.; Magalhaes, L.C .; Siegfried, B.D. On-plant survival and inheritance of resistance to Cry1Ab toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis in a field-derived strain of European O. furnacalis, Ostrinia nubilalis. Pest Management Science. 2009, 65(10): 1071-1081.
  7. Crespo, A.L.B.; Rodrigo-Simón, A .; Siqueira, H.A.A.; Pereira, E.J.G.; Ferré, J.; Siegfried, B.D. Cross-resistance and mechanism of resistance to Cry1Ab toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis in a field-derived strain of European O. furnacalis, Ostrinia nubilalis. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2011, 107(3): 185-192.
  8. Alam, A.; Abbas, S.; Ahmad, B.; Shakeel, M.; Liang, J.Y.; Khan, K.A.; Ghramh, H.A.; Dewer, Y.; Ali, J.; Tonga, A.; Li, Q.Y.; Zhao, C.R. Leveraging volatile organic compound-induced toxic and behavioural effects for potential sustainable management of Ostrinia furnacalis. Bulletin Of Entomological Research. 2025.
  9. Tian, C.H.; Zhang, J.Y.; Xu, C.Y.; Li, G.P.; Huang, J.R.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G.S.; Feng, H.Y.; Yin, X.M.; Feng, H.Q. Predation capacity of Labidura riparia Pallas against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Plant Protection. 2023,49(01):157-163. (In Chinese).
  10. Tian, C.H.; Zhang, J.Y.; Li, G.P.; Huang, J.R.; Yin, X.M.; Feng, H.Q. Biological characteristics of riparian earwig Labidura riparia and its predatory capacity against fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. Journal of Plant Protection. 2022,49(05):1499-1504. (In Chinese).
  11. Tian, C.H.; Cao, H.Y.; Zhang, J.Y; Liu, X.G.; Cai, T.; Li, G.P.; Huang, J.R.; Feng, H.Q. Behavioral and Functional Responses of Labidura riparia Pallas Preying on Spodoptera frugiperda. Chinese Journal of Biological Control.2021,37(06):1160-1165. (In Chinese).
  12. Tian, C.H.; Li, J.P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.Y.; Gao, X.J.; Yin, X.M.; Yang, L.R.; Feng, H.Q. Involvement Of Gonolabis Distincta In The Control Of Root Maggots In Garlic Fields. Life-Basel, 2025, 15(8).
  13. Yao, B.K.; Du, J.Y.; Gao, L.P.; Cao, F.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.H.; Wang, X.P. Study of the predation of Plutella xylostella by Sycanus bifidus. Journal of Biosafety. 2025,34(01):81-85+102. (In Chinese).
  14. Huang, Z.H.; Wu, J.F.; Zhang, Z.Q. A Preliminary Study on the Bionomics and Application of Sycanus croceovittatus (Hemiptera, Reduviidae). Forest Research. 1991, (01): 57-64. (In Chinese).
  15. Wang, Y.N.; Wu, Z.B.; Zhao, S.Y.; He, Y.Z.; Huang, J.R.; Tian, C.H.; Li, G.P.; Feng, H.Q. Morphological characteristics of Sycanus croceovittatus Dohrn. Plant Protection. 2021, 47 (05):230-235. (In Chinese).
  16. Du, H.; Zhi, J.Z.; Zhou, J.S.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, J.C.; Yue, J.W. Predatory functional response of Sycanus croceovittatus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) adults on Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Journal of Biosafety. 2021,30(04):287-291. (In Chinese).
  17. Li, G.Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.Q.; Yang, Y.L. Study on feeding technology of Sycanus croceovittatus Dohrn. Yunnan Agricultural Science and Technology. 2022,(02):6-8. (In Chinese).
  18. Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. An efficient bait for earwig trapping and its preparation method. 202011121772.2. 2021-01-01. (In Chinese).
  19. Holling, C.S.Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism.Canadian Entomologist. 1959, 91(7):385-398.
  20. Zhou, J.Z.;Chen, C.M. Quantitative Measurement Of Selectivity Of Predator For Prey. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 1987, (01):50-56. (In Chinese).
  21. Ren, X.M.; Xu, Z.W.; Zhao, B.; Lu, J.F.; Sun, Y.E.; Zhan, M.K. Predatory Behaviors and Abilities of Sycanus croceouittatus Adults to Spodoptera frugiperda Larvae. Biological Disaster Science. 2022,45(01):48-52. (In Chinese).
  22. Ge, F.; Men, X.Y.; Li, Z.; Ju, Q.; Zhang, X.R.; Liang, X.Y. Main achievements and prospects in the ecological regulation and management of pests in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology. 2025,62(03):549-558. (In Chinese).
  23. Yang, J.K. Three-dimensional control measures of main pests in facility cultivation of melon and fruit vegetables. Shanghai Vegetables. 2007,(06):82. (In Chinese).
  24. WANG, J.X. Study on host search mechanism of twonatural enemies of Aromia gungii usingkairomone and their joint bio-controleffect. Hebei University.2022. (In Chinese).
  25. Wu, L.L.; Wang, L.D.; Li, Q.C.; Zhou, C.; Dong, Y.; Yan, F.; Xu, Y.Y. Common Control Effect of Chrysoperla sinica and Harmonia axyridis on Greenhouse Aphids. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences. 2018,(10):79-81. (In Chinese).
  26. Gao, X.Y.; Shi, J.; Qiao, Z.H.; Lv, D.L.; Wu, H.C. Study on the synergistic predation of Harmonia axyridis and Propylaea japonica adults on Aphis gossypii. Agriculture and Technology. 2016,36(10):19-20. (In Chinese).
  27. Sourassou, N.F.; Hanna, R.; Negloh, K.; Breeuwer, J.A.J.; Sabelis, M.W. Females as intraguild predators of males in cross-pairing experiments with phytoseiid mites. Experimental And Applied Acarology. 2013,61(2):173-182.
Figure 1. Predatory functional response of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis.
Figure 1. Predatory functional response of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis.
Preprints 189105 g001
Figure 2. Predatory test of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on the 3rd instar larvae of O.furnacalis.
Figure 2. Predatory test of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus on the 3rd instar larvae of O.furnacalis.
Preprints 189105 g002
Figure 3. L. riparia and S. croceovittatus preying on O. furnacalis. a: L. riparia b:S. croceovittatus.
Figure 3. L. riparia and S. croceovittatus preying on O. furnacalis. a: L. riparia b:S. croceovittatus.
Preprints 189105 g003
Figure 4. Predatory functional response of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalisa : L. riparia b : S. croceovittatus.
Figure 4. Predatory functional response of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalisa : L. riparia b : S. croceovittatus.
Preprints 189105 g004
Figure 5. The predation ability of different treatments on O. furnacalis a : 20 heads / dish; b : 30 heads / dish; c : 40 heads / dish; d : 50 heads / dish; e : 60 heads / dish; f : 70 heads / dish. Note : * in the figure represents a significant difference between different treatments.
Figure 5. The predation ability of different treatments on O. furnacalis a : 20 heads / dish; b : 30 heads / dish; c : 40 heads / dish; d : 50 heads / dish; e : 60 heads / dish; f : 70 heads / dish. Note : * in the figure represents a significant difference between different treatments.
Preprints 189105 g005aPreprints 189105 g005b
Table 1. Predatory functional response of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis.
Table 1. Predatory functional response of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to the 3rd instar larvae of O. furnacalis.
Types of natural enemies Holling Ⅱdisc equation R2 instantaneous attack rate duration(d) Predatory efficiency daily maximum prey capacity (individual·d-1)
L. riparia Na=1.181N/(1+0.027N) 0.967 1.181 0.023 51.3 43.5
S. croceovittatus Na=1.025N/(1+0.009N) 0.984 1.025 0.009 113.9 108.7
Table 2. Predatory amount and preference index of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to O. furnacalis.
Table 2. Predatory amount and preference index of L. riparia and S. croceovittatus to O. furnacalis.
O. furnacalis L. riparia S. croceovittatus
Predatoryquantity
(individual)
preference index
(Ci)
Predatoryquantity
(individual)
preference index
(Ci)
1st instar larva 6.4±0.8 a 0.23 1.4±0.4 c -0.64
2nd instar larva 6.0±0.6 a 0.21 3.0±0.8 c -0.37
3rd instar larva 5.6±0.8 a 0.16 7.2±0.7 b 0.08
4th instar larva 1.4±0.5 b -0.53 9.4±0.5 a 0.22
5th instar larva 0.5±0.2 b -0.75 9.2±0.4 a 0.21
Note : The different lowercase letters in the table indicate that Labidura riparia or Sycanus croceovittatus have significant differences in the predation of different instars of O.furnacalis larvae (P<0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated