1. Introduction
The study of null structures in pseudo-Riemannian geometry provides fundamental insight into the causal relationships and local geometric rigidity of manifolds [
5,
8,
10]. Weak null-preserving maps offer a minimal yet powerful framework to investigate how null directions are preserved under smooth mappings without requiring full conformality or isometry [
2,
3,
4]. These maps have applications in mathematics and theoretical physics, for instance in embedding lower-dimensional spacetimes into higher-dimensional models, analyzing causal projections, and studying geometric constraints arising from Lorentzian structures [
6,
7,
14].
Classical results mostly focused on equidimensional mappings, showing that continuous causal-preserving maps are essentially conformal [
2] and that the class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of spacetime [
3]. Hawking, King, and McCarthy [
4] introduced alternative topologies compatible with causal structures, and later studies [
9,
11,
12,
13] extended these ideas to more general pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, examining differentiability, null geodesic structures, and causal embeddings.
Recently in[
1] , we introduced interdimensional weak null-preserving maps
, where the source and target Pseudo-Riemannian Manifolds have different dimensions. In this framework, the deviation tensor
T quantifies the failure of a map to be conformal along null directions, and a canonical decomposition describes
T locally. While that work established existence and basic properties, it did not provide a systematic classification of
T nor study its behavior under perturbations, leaving open questions regarding the structure of
T and its robustness under smooth deformations.
In this paper, we provide some extensions of the theory. We classify the deviation tensor T in terms of rank and kernel structure for interdimensional weak null-preserving maps, introduce weak k-plane null-preserving maps that preserve entire k-dimensional null subspaces, and analyze the local stability of T under small perturbations of the mapping. This approach not only extends the previous work by offering a complete local description of T, but also introduces new mathematical structures and constraints that were absent in the earlier study, demonstrating both the reduction of maximal rank under k-plane preservation and the quantitative bounds on stability.
These results deepen the understanding of interdimensional causal mappings, provide new tools for studying the interplay between null structures and mappings of different dimensions, and lay the foundation for future investigations in geometric analysis, Lorentzian geometry, and applications in theoretical physics [
15].
We recall definitions from [
1].
Definition 1.
Let be a pseudo-Riemannian manifold of dimension . The null cone at is
Definition 2.
Let and be pseudo-Riemannian manifolds. A map isinterdimensional weak null-preserving
if:
Definition 3.
For a weak null-preserving map F, the deviation tensor T is defined locally by:
where Ω is a smooth positive function determined by the canonical decomposition.
2. Classification of Deviation Tensor
In this section, we provide a complete local classification of the deviation tensor T according to its rank and kernel structure.
Theorem 1.
Let be an interdimensional weak null-preserving map with , and let T be its deviation tensor. Then, for each point , T can be locally decomposed as
where , are 1-forms vanishing on , and . Moreover:
.
.
For , T vanishes along all null directions tangent to the kernel.
Proof. Fix a point
. Since
has rank at most
m, it follows that
Let
be a maximal set of linearly independent null vectors in
. By the definition of the deviation tensor
T, we have
for all null vectors
, which implies
Next, choose a complementary subspace
such that
On
W,
is a symmetric bilinear form on a pseudo-Riemannian space of dimension at most
m. By the spectral theorem for symmetric tensors, there exist scalars
and 1-forms
on
W, with
, such that
Extending each
to
by setting
for all
, we obtain the decomposition
over the full tangent space.
From this construction, it follows that
In the special case
,
T vanishes along all null directions tangent to the kernel, completing the classification. □
Corollary 1.
: T is entirely degenerate; F is conformal along null directions tangent to .
: T has maximal deviation; any null vector outside contributes non-trivially.
3. Weak k-Plane Null-Preserving Maps
Definition 4. is weak k-plane null-preserving
if for any , every k-dimensional null subspace satisfies:
Proposition 1.
Every weak k-plane null-preserving map is weak null-preserving. Conversely, if , weak k-plane preservation imposes stricter constraints on the deviation tensor T, reducing its possible rank.
Proof. Let
be a weak
k-plane null-preserving map. By definition, for each point
and every
k-dimensional null subspace
, the differential maps the subspace into a null subspace of
:
Since
is spanned by
k linearly independent null vectors
, the image under
of each
is null in
, i.e.,
This immediately implies that
F preserves each individual null direction contained in
. Because this holds for all
k-dimensional null subspaces at
p, and all points
, we conclude that
F is weak null-preserving.
Conversely, suppose
. Preservation of every
k-dimensional null subspace
imposes additional linear constraints on the deviation tensor
T. Indeed, for each
, the vectors in the image
are null, so
T must vanish on all vectors in the span of
. Denote the kernel of
T at
p by:
where the union is over all
k-dimensional null subspaces of
.
As a consequence, the maximal rank of T is reduced relative to the general weak null-preserving case, because its kernel now contains additional directions corresponding to these k-planes. Hence, weak k-plane null-preservation restricts the possible rank of T further than general weak null-preservation. □
4. Stability Analysis under Perturbations
Proposition 2.
Let be a perturbation of a map , with ϵ sufficiently small and smooth. Then the deviation tensor associated to satisfies:
and its rank satisfies:
Proof. By definition, the deviation tensor for
is:
Using the smoothness of
and linearity of the pullback, we have:
where
denotes the linearized change of the pullback metric induced by
H.
Similarly, the conformal factor
is smooth in
, so:
Subtracting
from
gives:
For the rank estimate, observe that the leading-order perturbation
has image contained in the span of
. Hence, the maximal possible increase in the rank of
relative to
T is at most:
giving:
This completes the proof. □
5. Examples of Original Classes
Example 1.
Consider the map with , defined by:
Here, , and one can compute the deviation tensor T explicitly using:
By construction, T attains maximal rank , corresponding to the two independent directions outside . The kernel of the differential is spanned by vectors and , along which T is degenerate, i.e.,
This example illustrates the case where the deviation from conformality is maximal and aligns with the upper bound .
Example 2.
Consider the map with , defined by
where is smooth. Let us choose ϕ such that the 2-dimensional null planes spanned by and are mapped to null directions in . In this setting, the deviation tensor T has rank , demonstrating a reduction in rank due to the imposed weak 2-plane preservation condition. The kernel of T contains the directions corresponding to the preserved null planes:
This example shows explicitly how weak k-plane preservation restricts the possible deviation of F, reducing the maximal rank of T in comparison with the general weak null-preserving case.
Example 3.
Let with , , be defined by:
with smooth. The deviation tensor T for F has rank , with kernel containing directions corresponding to and combinations of determined by ϕ.
Now consider a small perturbation :
with and smooth. By Proposition 4.1, the perturbed deviation tensor satisfies:
Explicitly, if , then the rank of increases at most by one:
This example illustrates the quantitative bound on the rank of T under small perturbations and shows how the structure of the kernel evolves, providing insight into the local stability of the deviation tensor under smooth deformations of the map F.
6. Conclusions
In this work, we have presented a systematic and original study of interdimensional weak null-preserving maps between pseudo-Riemannian manifolds. We provided a complete local classification of the deviation tensor T in terms of its rank and kernel structure, introduced the concept of weak k-plane null-preserving maps, and analyzed the stability of T under small perturbations of the mapping.
These results extend the foundational work of [
1] by offering not only a rigorous local description of
T but also by introducing new mathematical structures and analyses that were absent in the previous study:
The previous work established the existence of interdimensional weak null-preserving maps and provided a canonical decomposition of T, but it did not classify T systematically; here, we provide a complete local classification in terms of rank and kernel, including the extreme cases of degenerate and maximal-rank behaviors.
We define and study weak k-plane null-preserving maps, a novel class of maps that impose stricter constraints on T by preserving entire k-dimensional null subspaces, thereby reducing the possible rank. This concept and its consequences were not considered previously.
We analyze the local stability of T under small perturbations, providing quantitative bounds on changes in rank and kernel structure. The previous work did not investigate how T behaves under smooth deformations of the map.
Beyond these contributions, our results lay a solid foundation for future research directions, including the global classification of deviation tensors, exploration of curvature-related constraints, and applications in the study of interdimensional causal embeddings in both mathematical and physical contexts. These developments may inform the understanding of higher-dimensional causal structures, Lorentzian geometry, and geometric rigidity phenomena in theoretical physics [
5,
8,
15]. Overall, this study offers new tools and perspectives for analyzing the interplay between null structures and interdimensional mappings, opening pathways for both theoretical investigations and practical applications in geometry and relativity.
References
- Touat, A. On Local Null-Preserving Maps Between Pseudo-Riemannian Manifolds of Different Dimensions; Preprint, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Zeeman, E. C. Causality implies the Lorentz group. J. Math. Phys. 1964, vol. 5, 490–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malament, D. The class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of spacetime. J. Math. Phys. 1977, vol. 18, 1399–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawking, S. W.; King, A. R.; McCarthy, P. J. A new topology for curved spacetime. J. Math. Phys. 1976, vol. 17, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beem, J. K.; Ehrlich, P. E. Global Lorentzian Geometry, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- García-Parrado, A.; Senovilla, J. M. Causal relationship: a new tool for the causal characterization of Lorentzian manifolds. Class. Quantum Grav. 2002, vol. 19, 1885–1920. [Google Scholar]
- Minguzzi, E.; Sánchez, M. “The causal hierarchy of spacetimes,” in Recent developments in pseudo-Riemannian geometry. ESI Lect. Math. Phys. 2008, 299–358. [Google Scholar]
- O’Neill, B. Semi-Riemannian Geometry with Applications to Relativity; Academic Press, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Beem, J. K.; Ehrlich, P. E.; Easley, K. Global Lorentzian Geometry, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Hawking, S. W.; Ellis, G. F. R. The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time; Cambridge Univ. Press, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Penrose, R. A remarkable property of plane waves in general relativity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1965, vol. 37, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geroch, R. Domain of dependence. J. Math. Phys. 1970, vol. 11, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sachs, R. K. Gravitational waves in general relativity. VI. The outgoing radiation condition. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 1962, vol. 270, 103–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penrose, R.; Rindler, W. Spinors and Space-Time; Cambridge University Press, 1972; Vol. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Wald, R. M. General Relativity; University of Chicago Press, 1984. [Google Scholar]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).