Submitted:
20 December 2025
Posted:
23 December 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Compounds Synthesis and Characterization
3.2. Rotation of Imine Fragment
3.3. Antibacterial Activity
3.4. Lipophilicity Modelling
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AI | artificial intelligence |
| CFU | colony forming units |
| GLP | GraphormerLogP model |
| FT-IR | fourier transform infrared spectroscopy |
| MAE | mean absolute error |
| ML | machine learning |
| RDK | RDKit library |
| RMSE | root mean squared error |
| SMD | solvation model based on density |
| SMILES | simplified molecular input line entry system |
| QC | quantum chemistry |
| QSAR | quantitative structure-activity relationships |
References
- Hameed, A.; al-Rashida, M.; Uroos, M.; Abid Ali, S.; Khan, K.M. Schiff Bases in Medicinal Chemistry: A Patent Review (2010-2015). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2017, 27, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kajal, A.; Bala, S.; Kamboj, S.; Sharma, N.; Saini, V. Schiff Bases: A Versatile Pharmacophore. J. Catal. 2013, 2013, 893512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceramella, J.; Iacopetta, D.; Catalano, A.; Cirillo, F.; Lappano, R.; Sinicropi, M.S. A Review on the Antimicrobial Activity of Schiff Bases: Data Collection and Recent Studies. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pencheva, I.; Peikova, L.; Tsvetkova, D. Pharmacological Applications of Azomethine Derivatives in the Therapy of Different Diseases. Pharmacia 2025, 72, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shekhar, S.; Khan, A.M.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, B.; Sarkar, A. Schiff Base Metallodrugs in Antimicrobial and Anticancer Chemotherapy Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Emergent Mater. 2022, 5, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pervaiz, M.; Sadiq, A.; Sadiq, S.; Saeed, Z.; Imran, M.; Younas, U.; Majid Bukhari, S.; Rashad Mahmood Khan, R.; Rashid, A.; Adnan, A. Design and Synthesis of Schiff Base Homobimetallic-Complexes as Promising Antimicrobial Agents. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 137, 109206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shanty, A.A.; Philip, J.E.; Sneha, E.J.; Prathapachandra Kurup, M.R.; Balachandran, S.; Mohanan, P.V. Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Studies of Schiff Bases Derived from Heterocyclic Moiety. Bioorganic Chem. 2017, 70, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, A.; Siddiqui, H.L.; Ashraf, C.M.; Ahmad, M.; Weaver, G.W. Synthesis, Characterization and AntibacterialActivity of Azomethine Derivatives Derived from 2-Formylphenoxyacetic Acid. Molecules 2007, 12, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patil, S.A.; Prabhakara, C.T.; Halasangi, B.M.; Toragalmath, S.S.; Badami, P.S. DNA Cleavage, Antibacterial, Antifungal and Anthelmintic Studies of Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) Complexes of Coumarin Schiff Bases: Synthesis and Spectral Approach. Spectrochim. Acta. A. Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 137, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sztanke, K.; Maziarka, A.; Osinka, A.; Sztanke, M. An Insight into Synthetic Schiff Bases Revealing Antiproliferative Activities in Vitro. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 3648–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zubair, M.; Sirajuddin, M.; Ullah, K.; Haider, A.; Perveen, F.; Hussain, I.; Ali, S.; Tahir, M.N. Synthesis, Structural Peculiarities, Theoretical Study and Biological Evaluation of Newly Designed O-Vanillin Based Azomethines. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1205, 127574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chinnasamy, R.; Sundararajan, R.; Govindaraj, S. Synthesis, Characterization, and Analgesic Activity of Novel Schiff Base of Isatin Derivatives. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2010, 1, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, S.J.; Ha, Y.M.; Park, Y.J.; Park, J.Y.; Song, Y.M.; Ha, T.K.; Chun, P.; Moon, H.R.; Chung, H.Y. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of (E)-N-Substituted Benzylidene–Aniline Derivatives as Tyrosinase Inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 57, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negm, N.A.; Zaki, M.F.; Salem, M.A.I. Cationic Schiff Base Amphiphiles and Their Metal Complexes: Surface and Biocidal Activities against Bacteria and Fungi. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 77, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sprung, M.A. A Summary of the Reactions of Aldehydes with Amines. Chem. Rev. 1940, 26, 297–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Lengeling, B.; Aspuru-Guzik, A. Inverse Molecular Design Using Machine Learning: Generative Models for Matter Engineering. Science 2018, 361, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Bai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, B.; Jia, Y.; Zeng, Z. Synthesis and Biological Activity of 4,5-Dihydro-1,2,4-Triazole-5-Thione Schiff Base. Chin. J. Chem. 2009, 27, 1397–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geronikaki, A.V. Paola; Incerti, Matteo; Hadjipavlou-Litina, Dimitra Thiazolyl and Isothiazolyl Azomethine Derivatives with Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Activities. Arzneimittelforschung 2004, 54, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Wu, Z.; Du, Y.; Huang, Y.; Jin, S. Solvothermal Synthesis of Novel Phenylpyrazole Schiff Base Fluorescent Insecticides Fused Extended Conjugate Units for Enhancing Bioactivities, Photophysical and Electrochemical Properties. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1196, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muratov, E.N.; Bajorath, J.; Sheridan, R.P.; Tetko, I.V.; Filimonov, D.; Poroikov, V.; Oprea, T.I.; Baskin, I.I.; Varnek, A.; Roitberg, A.; et al. QSAR without Borders. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3525–3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waring, M.J. Lipophilicity in Drug Discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2010, 5, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arnott, J.A.; Planey, S.L. The Influence of Lipophilicity in Drug Discovery and Design. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2012, 7, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsopelas, F.; Giaginis, C.; Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A. Lipophilicity and Biomimetic Properties to Support Drug Discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2017, 12, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Chen, X.; Javeria, H.; Du, Z. High-Throughput Screening of LogD by Using a Sample Pooling Approach Based on the Traditional Shake Flask Method. J. Chromatogr. B 2023, 1227, 123804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Bruijn, J.; Busser, F.; Seinen, W.; Hermens, J. Determination of Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients for Hydrophobic Organic Chemicals with the “Slow-Stirring” Method. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1989, 8, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodburn, K.B.; Doucette, W.J.; Andren, A.W. Generator Column Determination of Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients for Selected Polychlorinated Biphenyl Congeners. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1984, 18, 457–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terada, H. Determination of Log Poct by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, and Its Application in the Study of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relatsh. 1986, 5, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Win, Z.-M.; Cheong, A.M.Y.; Hopkins, W.S. Using Machine Learning To Predict Partition Coefficient (Log P) and Distribution Coefficient (Log D) with Molecular Descriptors and Liquid Chromatography Retention Time. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023, 63, 1906–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, D.; Patel, C. Revisiting the Use of Quantum Chemical Calculations in LogPoctanol-Water Prediction. Molecules 2023, 28, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neese, F. The ORCA Program System. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neese, F. Software Update: The ORCA Program System—Version 6.0. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2025, 15, e70019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grimme, S.; Hansen, A.; Ehlert, S.; Mewes, J.-M. r2SCAN-3c: A “Swiss Army Knife” Composite Electronic-Structure Method. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 064103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bursch, M.; Mewes, J.-M.; Hansen, A.; Grimme, S. Best-Practice DFT Protocols for Basic Molecular Computational Chemistry**. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202205735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marenich, A.V.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Universal Solvation Model Based on Solute Electron Density and on a Continuum Model of the Solvent Defined by the Bulk Dielectric Constant and Atomic Surface Tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanwell, M.D.; Curtis, D.E.; Lonie, D.C.; Vandermeersch, T.; Zurek, E.; Hutchison, G.R. Avogadro: An Advanced Semantic Chemical Editor, Visualization, and Analysis Platform. J. Cheminformatics 2012, 4, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chemcraft - Graphical Software for Visualization of Quantum Chemistry Computations. Version 1.8, Build 780. Https. Available online: Www.Chemcraftprog.Com.
- Grigorev, V.; Serov, N.; Gimadiev, T.; Poyezzhayeva, A.; Sidorov, P. Graph-based transformer to predict the octanol-water partition coefficient. J. Chemoinformatics. In press.
- Nugmanov, R.; Dyubankova, N.; Gedich, A.; Wegner, J.K. Bidirectional Graphormer for Reactivity Understanding: Neural Network Trained to Reaction Atom-to-Atom Mapping Task. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2022, 62, 3307–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fallani, A.; Nugmanov, R.; Arjona-Medina, J.; Wegner, J.K.; Tkatchenko, A.; Chernichenko, K. Pretraining Graph Transformers with Atom-in-a-Molecule Quantum Properties for Improved ADMET Modeling. J. Cheminformatics 2025, 17, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wildman, S.A.; Crippen, G.M. Prediction of Physicochemical Parameters by Atomic Contributions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 868–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- RDKit. Available online: http://www.rdkit.org/ (accessed on 14 October 2025).
- Galkina, I.V.; Kiyamova, E.R.; Gaynullin, A.Z.; Bakhtiyarov, D.I.; Shulaeva, M.P.; Pozdeev, O.K.; Egorova, S.N.; Ivshin, K.A.; Kataeva, O.N.; Bakhtiyarova, Y.V.; et al. Synthesis and Structure of Novel Phosphorylated Azomethines. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2016, 191, 1679–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salih, K.S.M. Solvent Influence on Absorption Spectra and Tautomeric Equilibria of Symmetric Azomethine-Functionalized Derivatives: Structural Elucidation and Computational Studies. ChemistryOpen 2022, 11, e202100237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| N | Compound | The size of the growth inhibition zone, d (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | Bacillus cereus | P. аeruginosa | S. aureus | Candida albicans | ||
| 1 | ortho-NO2C18 | 12±2 | 12±1 | 14±2 | 10±2 | 20±3 |
| 2 | meta-NO2C18 | 15±3 | 14±3 | 22±3 | 11±1 | 0 |
| 3 | para-NO2C18 | 10±1 | 10±1 | 11±3 | 10±1 | 17±3 |
| 4 | meta-NO2C14 | 17±1 | 22±2 | 15±1 | 24±3 | 20±2 |
| 5 | para-NO2C14 | 15±1 | 17±2 | 19±2 | 22±3 | 20±3 |
| 6 | meta-NO2C12 | 17±2 | 22±3 | 15±4 | 24±5 | 20±2 |
| 7 | para-NO2C12 | 15±3 | 17±4 | 19±2 | 22±4 | 20±3 |
| 8 | para-BrC16 | 25±3 | 27±4 | 16±2 | 16±2 | 16±3 |
| 9 | para-ClC16 | 10±1 | 14±2 | 0 | 0 | 11±1 |
| 10 | “Kodan” | 16±1 | 18±2 | 15±1 | 19±2 | 18±2 |
| 11 | Miramistin | 0 | 13±1 | 0 | 0 | 13±1 |
| 12 | Chlorhexidine | 0 | 13±1 | 0 | 0 | 13±1 |
| isomer | alkyl chain | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C12 | C14 | C16 | C18 | |||||||||
| QC | GLP | RDK | QC | GLP | RDK | QC | GLP | RDK | QC | GLP | RDK | |
| Bromine derivatives | ||||||||||||
| ortho | 8.14 | 8.88 | 6.79 | 8.80 | 9.58 | 7.57 | 9.83 | 9.83 | 8.35 | 11.13 | 9.72 | 9.13 |
| ortho' | 7.93 | 8.88 | 6.79 | 8.95 | 9.58 | 7.57 | 10.06 | 9.83 | 8.35 | 10.95 | 9.72 | 9.13 |
| meta | 7.85 | 8.96 | 6.79 | 8.70 | 9.66 | 7.57 | 9.95 | 9.86 | 8.35 | 10.92 | 9.67 | 9.13 |
| meta’ | 7.81 | 8.96 | 6.79 | 8.69 | 9.66 | 7.57 | 9.65 | 9.86 | 8.35 | 11.08 | 9.67 | 9.13 |
| para | 8.49 | 8.96 | 6.79 | 8.82 | 9.73 | 7.57 | 9.48 | 9.98 | 8.35 | 10.71 | 9.81 | 9.13 |
| Chlorine derivatives | ||||||||||||
| ortho | 7.95 | 8.86 | 6.68 | 8.78 | 9.69 | 7.46 | 9.86 | 10.00 | 8.24 | 11.02 | 9.82 | 9.02 |
| ortho' | 7.97 | 8.86 | 6.68 | 8.76 | 9.69 | 7.46 | 10.03 | 10.00 | 8.24 | 10.99 | 9.82 | 9.02 |
| meta | 7.74 | 8.80 | 6.68 | 8.67 | 9.68 | 7.46 | 9.71 | 9.97 | 8.24 | 10.77 | 9.77 | 9.02 |
| meta’ | 7.67 | 8.80 | 6.68 | 8.79 | 9.68 | 7.46 | 9.77 | 9.97 | 8.24 | 10.68 | 9.77 | 9.02 |
| para | 7.63 | 8.88 | 6.68 | 8.75 | 9.74 | 7.46 | 10.69 | 10.02 | 8.24 | 11.93 | 9.84 | 9.02 |
| Nitro derivatives | ||||||||||||
| ortho | 7.06 | 8.28 | 5.93 | 7.93 | 9.25 | 6.71 | 9.20 | 9.83 | 7.50 | 10.12 | 9.87 | 8.28 |
| ortho' | 6.84 | 8.28 | 5.93 | 7.58 | 9.25 | 6.71 | 8.62 | 9.83 | 7.50 | 9.52 | 9.87 | 8.28 |
| meta | 6.42 | 8.01 | 5.93 | 7.23 | 9.01 | 6.71 | 8.44 | 9.70 | 7.50 | 9.46 | 9.90 | 8.28 |
| meta’ | 6.55 | 8.01 | 5.93 | 7.44 | 9.01 | 6.71 | 8.61 | 9.70 | 7.50 | 9.55 | 9.90 | 8.28 |
| para | 6.68 | 8.09 | 5.93 | 7.47 | 9.05 | 6.71 | 8.55 | 9.76 | 7.50 | 8.80 | 9.98 | 8.28 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).